Skip to content
TrackPodcasts
newsOct 2, 202639:30

Nick Reed 10.02.26 - Live At Ozark Farm Fest Hour 3

Get every episode summarized

Each time Nick Reed Podcast publishes, we email you a written briefing from the transcript — the topics, who appeared, and any specific claims, with the ad reads skipped.

Email me new episodes

Free for 3 shows. No card needed.

About this episode

“They're advertisers in the traditional sense. But I've worked for a lot of radio stations in which we had advertisers. And we really do have much closer relationships. And that doesn't mean that I personally know every single advertiser we have.”From the transcript

Hour 3 -

Nick Reed & Sarah Myers are broadcasting live at the 2026 Ozark Fall Farmfest:

  • Nick gives his input on New York Governor Kathy Hochul appointing State Attorney General Letitia James to take over the investigation for the Cornell University allegations
  • Nick's view on recent elderly woman killed via legalized homicide in Canada

See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

Hosts & guests

Transcript ready

565 searchable segments. Every word is indexed and playable.

Nick Reed 10.02.26 - Live At Ozark Farm Fest Hour 3

Nick Reed Podcast

0:00
39:30

Full transcript

Nick Reed Podcast — Nick Reed 10.02.26 - Live At Ozark Farm Fest Hour 3. Machine-transcribed; use the interactive transcript above to jump the player to any line.

It's going to sound just cliché. They're advertisers in the traditional sense. But I've worked for a lot of radio stations in which we had advertisers. And we really do have much closer relationships. We work with it. They really truly are partners. And that doesn't mean that I personally know every single advertiser we have. Some they just want to do ads and they know what they want to do. And that's it. They don't have any interest in anything beyond that. But we're so fortunate to be able to work closely with so many folks. And that's why we're able to do stuff like this. And again, Brad Pistol making it possible. Foreman Mechanical. He is the one that once again provided these hand fans this year. Fortunately, they won't be as needed as they were last year. But certainly as you're walking around a bit, the sun starts peaking through, it can get warm. And plus they're just kind of nice to have. They're good quality hand fans as well. So you can come by, pick those up. But throughout the day, you're going to hear both from Sarah and me. Sarah has been kind enough to throw herself into the mix the last couple of years.

I've just gone from, you know, boom, boom, boom, every single hour checking in with our, our partners just about every break for a couple of minutes and see what's going on. That way they can talk to you, let you know what they have going on. You're going to be hearing from San Chris trailer sales, crown power and equipment, flying feathers. They're just fantastic. I mean, all these people are. St. Clair of the Ozarks Home Improvements Outdoor Wonders, who's actually new with us. So very, very excited about that. I'm really excited about outdoor wonders because, and full disclosure, I haven't had a chance to meet with them yet. Jeremy has and today actually be the very first day that I've talked with him. But given Hunter hardscapes and outdoor and our outdoor patio area, we just have what I would consider temporary outdoor furniture there, not the real good quality stuff. And outdoor wonders, that's what they specialize in. Race brothers, return partner with us, W. Bar wife, fans, Ozarks, elder, law, of course. And then tomorrow, Springfield livestock, Wheeler medals, Wheeler medals are just one

of my favorite, just some of the nicest, coolest, most awesome people. And that is who we're going to be spending time with today and tomorrow and talking to with you, listening and maybe if you come out here, you can swing by and say hi. And I appreciate your patience as I go through and mention all of these people. But, you know, we're all here together and they're just crap tons of vendors. I'm telling you, there's so many different folks out here and there's no cost to get in. So if you think, I don't really know if it's my thing, I'm not necessarily a farmer. Maybe I got a little hobby farm or I thought about it. You got nothing to lose by coming out here and checking it out. And the weather's fantastic and wonderful. I want to talk about what appears to be coming into focus and the Democrats, I believe, are going to use the allegations of rape, focused on these seven students or former students at Cornell, this alleged rape that happened a couple of years ago.

But now all of a sudden is there's a civil case. And law enforcement at the time felt that there wasn't enough evidence for rape for reasons that we've talked about based off of the information that they have provided. We're talking about info that's out there public and we can kind of recap some of that stuff. There have been a couple of signals that Democrats are going to use this situation for political purposes. Which regardless of what happened is completely deplorable. Because if she's telling the truth, you're using her horrific nightmarish experience for political gain. If she isn't telling the truth, you are targeting seven innocent individuals putting a target

on their back and given the propensity for violence of followers of the Democrat Party, probably literally putting a target on their back. I will not be surprised if one or more of these individuals get murdered already at this point. It's like, you know, attempt to murder Trump and Charlie Kirk and Lee Zeldin and softball players at the Republican and softball field and Supreme Court Justice members. And, you know, Charlie Kirk, if I didn't mention him, that was successful, of course. I mean, it's just, it's become pretty commonplace that Democrat activists try to murder people that Democrats don't like. And so given what I believe is going to be using these seven in this case for political purposes, there's a good chance it's one or more than will be killed by some Democrat activists believing that they are doing something righteous. So point being is either whether they are innocent and she's not innocent or she is innocent

in a victim and they are bad guys. Neither scenario is one that should be used for political purposes. So what to expect from Democrats on this coming up, we'll talk about that here in just a couple of moments. Also, we'll have the latest weather, what to expect specifically. Right now though, the latest news update. I'm Mike Landis, the Ozarks First Newsroom. We're counting down the days until the November midterms and the battle for redistricting is top of mind for political leaders. Missouri Governor Mike Keyho says despite the back and forth in the courts, he believes the November third elections will be seamless. Voters will be casting their congressional ballots using the original 2022 map while voting on using the GOP-favored 2024 map for future elections. We'll see that Missouri is teaming up with a local and federal law enforcement for a unique way to solve cold cases with playing cards. Our intended audience is not the general public, but rather those who are incarcerated, who

might know what happened in a particular case. Each card in the deck features a face and details about the case that law enforcement is still trying to solve. I'm Mike Landis in the OzarksFirst.com newsroom in Springfield. First alert forecast, sponsored by Janice Automotive from Ozarks First Meteorologist Tom Schmitt. Still a slight chance to might see a shower popping up here there before 10 a.m. Otherwise, a mostly sunny day, high near 72. Tonight clear, 54 for low tomorrow, sunny 75 and Sunday, around and out the weekend, sunshine a little bit warmer, but still pretty nice with a high of 79. Traffic update now, Springfield's talk, 101, I'm Nick Reed. The background on this, you got a gal who was part of an investigation about a frat house drinking sex fest from a couple of years ago, and according to her, and there's been some updates.

I'm going to try to go through this in order to give you all the information and give context to it. Just try to look at this completely objectively. There was an investigation, but there were no charges a couple of years ago. This has come back up because she has decided to file a civil suit. Many people notice like why would you wait two years to do this? And I think while that is a valid question, I think at times there are valid answers for those questions. You can actually can have it both ways sometimes, and I think whenever there is a delay in someone filing a suit like this, you can legitimately ask, why did you wait so long? But on the other side of it, there could be legitimate reasons for that. This is a very traumatic thing when something like that happens. It is a sort of thing that oftentimes people initially they think if I just pretended

it didn't happen, I just try to move on, then I'll get past it, and then a year or two goes by and they realize that not only are they not getting past it, but they're actually getting worse because they weren't doing anything about it. And so they decide I have to do something about this because it's not going away. I'm not sleeping at night, I'm not getting better. All of these horrible things are happening to me emotionally, and I think part of it is because I just tried to pretend it didn't happen. And so those are reasonable responses from people who are victims to things. But also there could be other reasons for it. One of the biggest problems I have about a situation like this is trying to create an environment in which people are too scared to ask what are legitimate questions. And that is I'm telling you, the Democrats are setting up what they're wanting to do is set up a fight that they will get Republicans engaged in so that they can paint Republicans as being cold-hearted, being supportive of rape culture, that it's a white privilege

situation. I don't know the ethnicity of these boys. I'm going to guess that a majority of not all of them are white. And so that they can really lean into their marketing tools surrounding a specific case that has a victim in which the average person is very sympathetic for, but also create an environment in which if anybody dares ask legitimate questions, you're accused of not believing a rape victim. They've used this tactic before and it's been successful. Now what wrote initially came out law enforcement's like listen, here's some of the interview we did with her and she did. She at the time said that, hey, I got really ripped, drunk. I went to this frat house. She went voluntarily looking to have a good time.

Does it necessarily mean sex? But then admitted that the first engagement with two guys at once, she did because she liked one of the guys and that she thought he was really cute and attractive and that's why she did it. She talked about how the night went on and that she voluntarily with other guys, but you know, as the night went on, did ketamine and so she told law enforcement that she got to the point where she was kind of out of it. Now the thing about New York and New York law is if an individual gets voluntarily drunk or under the influence of drugs and then has sexual relations afterwards, it is not a, you are legally held responsible for your decision. Some states they'll argue and the law says, well, if you're incapacitated, you can't make the decision and so if somebody has sex with you while you're drunk and so you were out

of it and didn't know what was going on, that could be considered rape. That's not the law in New York. As long as you voluntarily got yourself drunk. Now if somebody drugged you, slipped you something and then you were out of it and took advantage of that sexually, that's a different situation. But the problem was she fully, yeah, she went to the bar by herself or friends got drunk that she got herself in that state. So legally what she described to law enforcement based off the information that had been released was not a criminal rape offense. What has happened since then that has allowed some people to really jump on this and I think some have a genuine reaction of horror is that apparently what the DA said wasn't turned over to him was that she also told police that at one point, yeah, I was so out of it, yeah, I definitely was raped. Now there are, is it a man for answers?

Like, well, okay, she said she was raped. So why was that part of the interview not turned over to the DA? Now I don't know, but I try to think of possible scenarios. Now bad scenario is they just didn't believe her. They thought that this wasn't worth investigating. They wanted to cover up for Cornell University and so they left that part out when it was turned over to prosecutors. Another possible scenario is that while she said based off of her experience, she believed she was raped, they knew that legally she was not based off of what she said happened. The encounters as she described them, according to the interviews, did not qualify as legal rape, even if she, in her mind, thought she had been a person simply believing that they

were the victim of a crime doesn't mean that the law is in line with what their belief is regarding a rape. So her definition may have been different than the legal definition. And so law enforcement may have seen it as irrelevant. Well, yeah, she said that, but that's not what the evidence she has provided indicates. Now some will argue it shouldn't matter. They could have put it in there anyhow, and that's a legitimate argument to have. But my point being is these things get grabbed onto. And then they are put out there as if this is an automatic no questions asked. The only motivation here could have been to cover this up. Instead of recognizing that there may have been some legitimate other reasons certain decisions were made, or maybe they were reasons that in retrospect weren't wise and maybe even should have been seen as a bad decision, but they weren't this horrific attempt to cover up for seven guys who gang raped a girl. Now all of a sudden you have Ocasio Cortez out there.

You have Kathy Hocal out there. They're all jumping on this and they're spreading disinformation. And I believe that it's deliberate. So for example, Ocasio Cortez, this is very cunning because it's subtle. Ocasio Cortez is out there claiming among other things, describing it as these guys lured her to the Fratt House to rape her. By her own admission, she just went over there because there was a party. There was no luring over her. There was no luring her there. Now this is the cunningness of putting out inaccuracies like that. And I think what is occurring here is they're trying to set traps. What they want is somebody who is debating them as a Republican in the context of politics to point out, well that's not exactly true. They didn't lure her there. She went there voluntarily because then they can paint the Republican as attacking the

rape victim. So what you do in this tactic is you have the overall theme of this is horrific. This is a rape culture problem in this country and you say some things that are factually inaccurate so that somebody who's interested in the truth points it out and then you can accuse them of being a problem, being part of the rape culture, being part of the problem, not the solution and trying to cover up for white privilege. The fact that Kathy Hocal has, I think, part of the reason also, Kathy Hocal has decided Latisha James who is an attorney general that ran on going after political opposition, who ran her campaign specifically Trump. On the concept of using her office for political purposes and she openly said that, elect me I'll find a way to get Donald Trump. She'd even say what she was going to get him for, just elect me and I'll get him.

If you truly genuinely cared about justice and you did not want to politicize what you saw as a truly horrific scenario, whatever the truth is, the last thing you would do is appoint someone who is probably one of the top most political law enforcement agents in her own capacity in the entire country. I believe Kathy Hocal did this because she knows that Republicans are going to attack the decision. She knows that Republicans are going to complain about Latisha James being the one that is now put in charge of this because what they want, they want to make these moves regarding this case to get Republicans to criticize it so that they can paint Republicans as covering up for the privilege white boys and the rape culture.

All of it's depraved and it goes back to the standard MO of the left and that is use people for political gains. If you are a girl, I'll tell you this, if this were a girl who accused a man who was a trans woman of sexual assault and the scenario was the same but you were talking about trans people, Democrats would not be talking about this at all. You would not even know about it because that would counter one of their other narratives. That would not be a usage of the trans community that they would see as beneficial to them so they would keep that quiet. But here's a scenario in which they believe they can use what is alleged to be a rape victim to their advantage because the perpetrators are people that they categorize as the bad people.

We're broadcasting live, it is farm-fest and the weather is wonderful, we're going to be out here today, we're going to be out here tomorrow and want to think as usual Brad Pistole, host of Ozark's retirement show for sponsoring it, he will be out here with us on air tomorrow and so we'll get a chance. There's eight shans, I don't think it's an overwhelming chance that this civil suit that has come two years after the accusations of rape or the accusations of rape are coming two years after the incident in a civil suit. I do not put it beyond Democrats to be behind prompting the civil suit. They've done this before. In New York, Jean Carroll, anyone? This is a woman that not until Trump was running for president, acknowledged she was encouraged to file a civil rape account against Donald Trump in New York.

Now here you have Democrats and they're not fully on the ropes but they're concerned that particularly in New York they're not doing as well as they're hoping that they would do and they're having a hard time defining themselves. They're fighting the socialism thing, they're finding the weirdo thing. And they don't really have that sort of issue that they can coalesce around and listen, they have in the past encouraged a person to years after an alleged event accuse somebody of sexual assault for political purposes. So by the way, that's not any sort of judgment on the student herself that is based off of the history of the Democrat Party. I mean, look at Al Sharpton and Tawana Brawley. That's another situation in which you had a young person that was coaxed for political

purposes into falsely accusing people of rape. A side note, this is one of the damaging effects that actual rape victims have to deal with is the fact that increasingly we see for political purposes, people on the left, convincing individuals to falsely claim that they were victims of sexual assault and every time they do that, it makes it more likely that people will next time wonder is this a repeat of what we've seen before? One of the great things about Farm Fest and being out here is I don't think there's a time I've been out here that I haven't met someone new that I've had a chance to get to know and become friends with. And I guess it was just about a year ago that that happened. I think it was a Saturday or a Sunday I was wrapping things up and then this very cowboyly gentleman looking gentleman walks by and we start having a conversation.

The next thing I knew was like an hour later, I'm at your place in Clever. Yep, we have order and some barbecue. And anyhow, the reason that I wanted to have you on is one of the things that you do and I'll have you introduce yourself and your place in Clever and how it all ties into these annual events that you do. Yeah, just started. Yeah. And so I know last year there was one that was maybe that week and was subsequent weekend so you would call me yesterday. You know, like, hey, coming up, we've got another one of these festivals. Yeah, yeah, come on and talk about it. So tell us about it if you would. Yes. So this is a festival at the Holston Mill Bluegrass Festival but it's at the Holston Mill Historical Park in Greenfield and it is some guys got together here a year or so ago and thought, hey, we needed to do something for a family and that's how it got started last year and they have just chosen another family for this year and we are going to the All Hands family and we're going to everything donations go to them and we've got five

bands lined up. It's October 11th next weekend from starting at 12 and we just got our little joint down there with some barbecue and we're hauling all of our road cooker and everything else up there so that we can cook and have everybody out. So last year, as I mentioned, we were kind of on our way out for the day and it was a Saturday, I believe, and wrapping up and as soon as I got in my vehicle to leave, I called my wife and I said, hey, I'm going to bring barbecue home tonight because you had told me cooks. There's barbecues and clarities. You've owned that how long? Three years, three, okay. So relatively new, I guess. That's a long time known a restaurant, I suppose, but I went over and then you walked in and this look on your face like, how did you get here already? I told you I was going to come over here and get some barbecue. But the cool thing about the place and I don't know how much of this history you wanted, I think it's kind of a neat story. You walk in and there's a few tables and then to the right, all these sewing machines and everything.

So if you would, like the story behind that and why it is because you all are out here for the gloves, right? For the company, which I, for Christmas, my wife got some. I've bought her some of the work gloves that you all have. But I think it's an interesting story. I like it. Yeah. So Mr. Albury was a man that we used to come to the farm fest every year and buy gloves from him. And he had the business for 30 or 40 years and it just got to be, he got to be older and it didn't look like he had a successor coming on out of his family. So we were just great customers and thought it would be a nice family business that we could all do together. And so this is our 16th year with it and it's our 16th farm fest in a row. And so why in one location, like, oh, I can get some barbecue and I can watch people hand-made these fine gloves. Yes. So we just did it on the farm forever and sometimes my daughter-in-law would have stuff in her house. So we'd have stuff. It was all scattered and they was driving me crazy. So I said, hey, we got to get some local place and I looked around and there's not a lot

of commercial real estate in Clevver, Missouri. Yeah, that's true. So it's true. I was in there eating barbecue and I asked these guys what they were doing and they said they'd like to sell it and I said, well, I just want to rent a space and they said, well, you can't have it unless you take on the barbecue. So I went home, pitched it to my wife and family and I heard everybody and she said absolutely not. That's a terrible idea. We need one more job and my daughter said, that I think we can do that. And I said, I think we can. So we overrode mom and so now we've got barbecue, glove manufacturing and sales right there and then we sell meat from the farm right out of there, too. I like the gloves all have attached to them a Bible verse. Yes. Colossus 3, 23. Yes. I like that. And I can attest their quality gloves. Yeah, that's great. And great customer service over there. Anytime I'm over there, fantastic customer service. Yeah, great. All right. So again, this event and meat hooks barbecue. It's coming up October 11th, 12 p.m. Holston Mill, Bluegrass Festival in Greenfield, Missouri and there is a Facebook page.

I see follow up for a day. So they've been putting lots of stuff on their name. Yeah, good. I feel like this is first time you're looking at this exactly out as well here. To learn more, let's see, follow Team Trip. It sounds like on Facebook. That's the young man that we're helping and then the two mill has it. It's own page. Yep. All right. What's the Facebook page for that for the or the mill? Is that where the festival info is? I bet it's probably a bowl. It's on the mill. Yep. Says Facebook follows for updates. All right. Well, hey, thanks for coming on. Appreciate it. Appreciate it. Yeah. So great for the days over. Thank you, Field Talk 101, continuing the Friday Road Show out here, Farm Fest, 2026. A big thank you again, Brad Pistole, host of Ozarks Retirement Show, sponsoring our two days out here at the Ozark Empire Fairgrounds. I'm Nick Rhee, the Friday Road Show Emily Johnson House Theory Realty. And it's just been in the last, I don't know, maybe a couple of years we've been telling you about Will because Will is the expert when it comes to buying and selling the big old plots of land, the ranch is the farms and the infrastructures that that uniquely come

along with that particular homestead, that lifestyle, which is a little bit different than somebody like me who lives in a neighborhood or maybe you live on a quarter-ank or kind of out in the country, but not necessarily for those big chunks of land and the two of them work together in tandem with one another. And it's always just top of mind for me when we're out here at Farm Fest to remind you that if you hear me talk about Emily Johnson and in your mind you hear her every so often talk about open houses and you think, well, we really need somebody to help us sell our property or look into buying a new property. But we got 1200 acres and that's not really necessarily what she's always talking about. That's what Will's there for. It is a great job. So whether it's massive pieces of land, you're going to live that yellow stone style life or you live like me in a quaint little neighborhood. You are covered with Emily, you're covered with Will, Emily Johnson House Theory Realty and you can find all their info under Nick's endorsements at ksgf.com.

There is a opinion piece in the New York Post, horrific killing of a Canadian grandma exposes Democrats, Euthanasia goal for the rest of us. And it starts out noting, this is a really dark statistic. In Canada, legalized homicide is the cause of one out of every 20 Canadian deaths. One out of every 20. People who die in Canada do it at the hands of the government. That probably gives Iran a run for its money. The country's medical assistance in dying regime known as made M.I.A.D., which is very clever and cozy. A made takes care. Kind of cleans up the mess. It's actually pretty appropriate when you think about it because a made service is known for cleaning up the mess, getting rid of the things that are in the way that you no longer

need, sort of tidying things up so they look much nicer. And that same terminology being used by the Canadians to eliminate people in society that, you know, there's just not much use for any longer. The program that has been in effect for 10 years has taken an estimated 100,000 lives. The numbers and shocking stories like Bridget Stagamon are a warning to America of what the Euthanasia movement has in store for us in the US. So this is one of, again, thousands and thousands, hundred thousand plus stories in Canada. This one is particularly heartbreaking though because as the story goes, she was basically tricked into this. And even once it had been explained to her what she had officially signed in order to do, she desperately cried. I made a mistake, but they killed her anyway. 83-year-old woman who didn't understand the procedure she had allegedly consented to

didn't understand that it meant they were going to kill her. According to her granddaughter when she explained to Stagamon or Stagamon what was going to happen the elderly woman started to cry and saying that I made a mistake, I made a mistake. She was put to death anyway by the Canadian government July 10th. Despite the fact that the granddaughter brought to the attention the fact that the grandmother did not want to be killed, this always starts out the same. It's sold to the American or to the population of whatever country is something that's done in the name of compassion. It's good for you. No, no, we're not doing this to harm you. We're not doing this because we believe that somehow it is going to lead to a more perfectly structured society that we have in our minds, but it's for you.

What they'll do is they'll find one or two little stories of a person who really truly is in some unimaginably difficult, horrific, painful situation that would make the average person think, I can't imagine going through that. I can't imagine going through that pain. I can't imagine going through that pain and not being able to just die. I think I would at least want the option of having someone help me go peacefully and painlessly. They use that as the hook to convince people to allow us to take on this burden as government, allow us to do this thing that is, it's just horrific and it's going to be extremely rare and it's for the best for the individual, for the person who can't escape the nightmare that they're in and you don't have to worry about it.

Then people surrender that power to the government and like all things government, it expands. Once government has the power of anything, whether it's to surveil people, to kill people, to do anything to people, they always find new rationalization to do it, rationalize. They always find, well, if we do it for this person over here, I mean, we could actually do it for this person over here as well. This is unfortunately becoming an increasingly common perspective and that is that somehow it is compassionate, it's humanitarian, it is appropriate for government to pick and choose people to kill. It's taken on variations, historically of course there's always the very obvious notation

of the socialist in Germany that created certain categories of people, most notably the Jewish people and just determined that they don't, you know, hey, they're a problem. They're in the way. We'll take care of them, don't worry, we'll get rid of them and everything will be better. In this country it's the unborn, same sort of argument that's made, hey, this is actually a righteous thing, this is a good thing. I mean, having all these babies that are born into poverty and they just get on the system and how are you supposed to get out of poverty if you're having kids and hey, let's not forget some kids aren't the perfect race and they may have defects or deficiencies and they might have down syndrome. What quality of life will they have? And so here in the United States, the target is the unborn. Canada, what's getting the highlight, it is the people that are no longer seen as useful and valuable to society, aka to the government.

See the government can't get anything out of old people. In the minds of the Canadian government, all old people do a suck up resources. They're just a weight, dragging them down and they have managed to find a way to sneak in the ability to start eliminating those people by convincing the culture of Canada that giving them that power is something that would only be used in the most extreme purposes only for the grand compassion of that particular victim of the horrific circumstances there end, but it expands and it expands and it expands and it gets to the point where now they're just telling old confused people, oh here's sign this, everything will be better and even once they get caught, they still kill them anyway because we have the signature. Make no mistake about it, it comes down to money. Out in California, one of the larger exposures of fraud and this is something that Dr. Oz

has talked about the massive spike in individuals being shipped to hospice care, like this huge spike. I forget what the percentage was, but it was clearly not a natural spike. And when you look at the numbers, it's a cost savings because once you take people who are on Medicaid or Medicare, people that the, you know, state of California convinced, hey, by the way, this is why socialized medicine is bad. This is what happens when government pays for your medical care, then what they can do if they declare you need to be in hospice, they no longer are required to provide life-saving treatment or treatments that might extend your life because you have been officially declared hospice, which means that there's no hope for you. So I'll just give you something to numb the pain until you die.

And what they've noticed, what's happened is you'll have these people that clearly are medically capable of with treatment living much longer. But that's just going to cost money. There's a budget that they have to hit. They are running out of money. And so how is it you save money? You cut those people off from their cancer treatments. You cut those people off from whatever treatment it is that cancer, of course, being a big one that could extend their life, you declare them hospice, you shove them over there, and you save that money. It's about money. So here in the United States and California, of course, being a big one already has adopted this approach of eliminating people that are older or that are suffering from diseases that cost them money out of their budget. They're just doing it in more of a backdoor sort of way, as opposed to Canada, that just straight up convinced people give us this power.

Big warning in this, big lesson in this. Whatever you decide to rely on from government, government can take away. Springfields talk, 101, I'm Nick Reed. Alright, excellent. People are going to be hearing from you this morning. Yes, I was just hanging out with my friends over at St. Chris trailer sales, and I took a look at that trailer that they're going to be giving away for the Warriors journey, doing raffle tickets. It is a really nice looking trailer. There's so generous. Do they have, what's there? I'm assuming they have a give away like you. The famous buckets. They are doing the buckets together this year. I'm telling you, I think human behavior can be hilarious at times. And last year, you would have thought these five gallon buckets, I think they're five gallon right, this blue thing. Yeah, standard blue. What? I think they've had three. Maybe in three gallon, but nonetheless, you would have thought they were gold bricks. Well, they're green this year. So, weren't they blue last year? They were green last year. Oh, were they green last year?

Okay, they were green last year as well. And so, Sunday morning, when I got here last year, or maybe it was Saturday morning, I was here before things opened up. And there was a line to get the, even they were like, what the heck, they're just buckets. And I don't mind it honestly because I'm like, you know what, with all the things and what, the things that people covet in this world that are so band damaging, there's almost something a little charming about adults. Like, you know what, I just want to bucket. That's a new light for that. But anyway, so yeah. And of course, crown parent equipment. I'll be talking to you from Flying Feathers, Sinclair, the Ozarks, Outdoor Wonders. Sarah will be with race brothers today. I'll then be at W. Bar, Wife Fence and Ozarks, Elder Law. And then tomorrow, Springfield Lifestyle for Sarah, Wheeler Metals, Remi, and then the 10 o'clock hour doing the show with Brad Pistole, host of Ozarks, Retirement Show. And the meantime, Glimbex coming up next. We'll talk to you throughout the day.

I'm Nick.

More episodes

More from Nick Reed Podcast

View all episodes →