Skip to content
TrackPodcasts
newsSep 19, 202637:16

Here’s the Scoop, Election Edition: It’s affordability, stupid!

Meet the Press

Get every episode summarized

Each time Meet the Press publishes, we email you a written briefing from the transcript — the topics, who appeared, and any specific claims, with the ad reads skipped.

Email me new episodes

Free for 3 shows. No card needed.

About this episode

“Today in your podcast feed, we're sharing a special election edition of our NBC News podcast. In this episode, Chief White House correspondent Garrett Hake sits down with experts to break down the key issues shaping the upcoming midterms.”From the transcript

If there’s one issue driving this election, it’s affordability. With prices for everything from gas and groceries to healthcare and childcare rising, many Americans feel the American Dream is slipping out of reach. Meanwhile, Democrats think this could be the key to their comeback, while President Donald Trump calls affordability a “hoax” — but is still pitching $5,000 payments for every voter if Republicans maintain control of the House and the Senate.

On Episode 2 of "Here’s the Scoop, Election Edition," NBC News chief White House correspondent Garrett Haake brings together NBC News senior policy reporter Shannon Pettypiece, former Rep. Garret Graves, R-La., and NBC News contributor Ashley Etienne, a former adviser to President Joe Biden, to discuss where voters are feeling the squeeze, why they don’t feel like the economy — or the government — is working for them and how the parties are responding on the campaign trail and beyond.


Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.

Know when Shannon Pettypiece turns up

Follow Shannon Pettypiece and once a week we email you every new episode they appeared on — including guest spots the show notes never mention, because we read the transcript.

Follow Shannon Pettypiece

Free. Pick your own day and time.

Hosts & guests

Transcript ready

677 searchable segments. Every word is indexed and playable.

Here’s the Scoop, Election Edition: It’s affordability, stupid!

Meet the Press

0:00
37:16

Full transcript

Meet the Press — Here’s the Scoop, Election Edition: It’s affordability, stupid!. Machine-transcribed; use the interactive transcript above to jump the player to any line.

Hi, Meet the Press listeners. Today in your podcast feed, we're sharing a special election edition of our NBC News podcast. Here's the scoop. In this episode, Chief White House correspondent Garrett Hake sits down with experts to break down the key issues shaping the upcoming midterms. Take a listen. If there is one issue driving this election, it's affordability. Every time you go to the grocery store or any place else, it affects you. Everything's gone up. I think I spent like probably 300 every few days just to fill up the tank. The rich are getting richer and the rest of us are sinking quickly. Welcome to Here's the scoop election edition. I'm Garrett Hake. Every Saturday from now until the midterms, I'm going to be talking with the smartest voices to discuss the top issues, the places and the players that could ultimately decide control in Washington. This week I spoke with two of the top political strategists of this election cycle, James Blair, head of MAGA Inc., and Congressman Pete Aguilar, chair of the House Democratic Caucus.

If you want to know where the parties are leaning in and where they have concerns, go back and check out that episode. This week we're going to go deep on the top issue defining this election cycle, affordability. For more than a year now, affordability has been the buzzword on every politician's lips. Democrats think it may be the key for unlocking their return to power. And it's Democrats that have the ideas that people really want to vote for. We're the ones who fight for affordability. We're the ones who president trump thinks it's all a scam. They use the word affordability, right? Fake, they are so fake because it was them that caused the affordability to use their word crisis. So what do we mean by affordability? Broadly, it's the disconnect between the money we earn, what we get to keep after taxes, and how much that matches up with the costs of our daily lives, from gas to groceries,

healthcare, and daycare, and if we're lucky, taking a vacation. As far as Washington is concerned, it's hard economic data and policy choices. But it's also about vibes. It's a gut feeling. Are you getting ahead or falling behind? Is anybody going to do anything to help? The polling on this could not be clearer. Voters see affordability and the cost of living as their top issue, and they are not happy with how Washington is responding. Today, I'm bringing in three people to talk about this issue who have spent time on the front lines. My colleague Shannon Petty-Piece is a senior policy reporter at NBC News, and all year she's been traveling across the country to learn how policies in Washington are affecting Americans bottom line. She's going to share some of their stories with us. We're also joined by NBC News contributor Ashley Etienne, who was a senior adviser in the Biden White House. She also worked for former House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, developing and messaging some of the policies we'll be talking about on the Democratic side.

And finally, former Republican Congressman Garrett Graves is with us. He represented Louisiana's sixth district for a decade before retiring from the House in 2025. He was a close adviser to former House Speaker Kevin McCarthy and has worked on legislation to address the affordability issue. Shannon Ashley Garrett, thank you all for being with us today. We're talking about affordability. This is something that the president has long said was fake. He talks about the issues kind of a scam. But then at this Republican convention in Dallas, he rolls out this idea of a $5,000 check to every American. What does that tell us about the real state of play here for Americans bottom lines? I want to get you all in on this. But Shannon, what did you think when you heard about that? Is that what people you're talking to want? They need so much more than a $5,000 check. People tell me they see systemic issues in this economy that are preventing them from getting ahead or that are leaving them falling behind. And it's not just one thing. It's not just, I need lower taxes on my tips.

It's not just a housing bill. It's not even just gas prices. It is across the economy, everything in their lives, groceries, utilities, property taxes, childcare, elder care. It goes on and on. And it's been going on for people for years at this point, years where they've been a family of five stuck in a two bedroom apartment or years where they've been driving a 20-year-old car, hoping they can upgrade it. And they do not see solutions coming from, you know, call it a gimmick or whatever, from a $1,000 check or one single piece legislation. I hear over and over again, people feeling like it is a systemic issue of an economy that is not working for them. So that's what I thought of when I heard about a $5,000 check. I said, okay, for most people, okay, even if there was a magically some check that appeared in the mail, it just goes to another credit card bill. It just maybe goes into savings account for a tiny emergency car repair down the road at some point. So that was the big policy rollout from that convention.

It was. And touching on the affordability issue or not touching on, I think focusing on it is absolutely key. It's one of those things that is pervasive. It affects every single family across this country. But attribution, I think, is really important. Which policies contributed to this? Which ones began fixing it? And it doesn't require us to just look at what's happening at the federal level. I think we need to look at the laboratory. What have states done in cases when they've been able to make improvements? But importantly, one of the bigger drivers here is energy. And we need to make sure that we're paying close attention to that. That we're bringing solutions to the table to address the supply and demand imbalance. It's happened over the last several years. I think it's one of those things that really cascades through the economy and has a profound effect on inflation. And you've seen the disproportionate energy impact across the country. Groceries is another one. But look, this isn't going to be popular with everybody here. But I think it is important to keep in mind. In the first Trump administration, inflation went up 8%. During the Biden administration, it went up 21%. So far in the last two years, I believe it's gone up like 6%.

This is a compounding thing. While the rate of inflation is dropped, we still have 8% plus 21% plus 6%. And we're all doing more expensive. Right. Everything's getting more expensive. Right. But is the offer for the checks a tell that there's not another way to dig out of that hole right now? So, Garrett, here's how I would approach that. If I had a wand, would I look at something that would provide immediate relief? I would, if and only if. I paired it with something that was going to address long-term economic challenges. And lastly, look, let me say this, which I hope we can all agree upon. This should not be a partisan issue. Affordability affects every single American. And I think it is outrageous that both Republicans and Democrats weaponize this because this has a profound effect on just people. And it's something that we shouldn't be weaponizing. Rather, it's something that we should all be coming together and working on solutions. Everybody agrees with the problem, not everybody agrees about the solutions. And we'll talk more about the solutions later, but Ashley, what did you think when you heard that roll out from the president?

I think not everybody agrees about the problem. Interesting. When you've got a president who says that the economy's going well and that it's all a scam, but yet he ran on affordability. I mean, this is the actual issue that he ran on. This was his only one singular promise that won him the White House, which is that he was going to lower cost. And so now all of a sudden, costs are going up from energy costs to your point, congressmen to grocery costs, to the cost of housing. It's affecting every aspect of everyone's lives and every aspect of the economy. The other interesting thing that I find about this, which is why we can't all agree on the problem, is that every major sort of policy advancement from this White House is really only compounding the problem. You've got the war in Iran. Now it's costing upwards of $100 billion. It's costing every household about $1,200. You've got the tear of policies, the back and forth, the swing. That's costing Americans somewhere upwards of a thousand bucks a month.

Now I would say, third to that is what we're seeing right now with data centers and AI. That's an issue that, again, you would normally associate with being an economic issue, but it actually has become that. You look at Gary and Deanna. Their electricity costs have gone up because of their data center. So what's your takeaway when the president is taking in all these inputs and rolls out the checks? The point I'm making is I think that you cannot get to, I appreciate what the congressman was saying, that we need to, in a bipartisan fashion, get to solutions. I definitely agree with that. But first, you've got to all agree that there is a problem. So you can't have the president calling it a scam, although he ran on it and is not doing anything to fix it, not even proposing anything to fix it. Second, the only solution is the 5K. I think interestingly enough, the 5K is really for one particular audience. And I think it's those Trump voters that, again, that are drinking the Kool-Aid, but that could afford to take the 5,000. You see it as a political issue. I think everyone will take the 5,000. I mean, nobody's sending it back. No, but I'm saying who wouldn't, I'm saying who wouldn't make a fuss about these larger

arguments, which is that the 5,000 is not solving the systemic problems in the economy. And then I would add to a deficit. There used to be an audience that would be concerned about whatever the math was like. And there wasn't any people who did on that, a trillion dollars that would add to the deficit, which were actually seen in real time, the bond markets care about, not to steer this into a bond market conversation. I mean, we are seeing the bond market kind of go and crazy in part because of the borrowing costs. I know that is a difficult message to voters, but to your point about not being able to agree on the solution or the problem, that's a proposed solution that adds to another problem. I want to set the stakes here a little bit and bring in some of your reporting Shannon. You met a young guy named Brandon right here in DC's, a mechanical engineer. He was living at home. I want to play some of your interview with him to help us understand what we're talking about here. If I moved to an apartment that was comparable to living with my parents, I would probably only have about like $400 profit margin off of it. And I thought that's not great because I'm going to go engineer.

I should have a pretty good standing. And I certainly work like living like a middle class setting right now. So right now, I know if I took all of my income, I could probably afford an apartment and if I did nothing else, I could probably have just enough clearance to do the occasional funds that I free now and again. Just occasional fun stuff. It's got to be a mechanical engineer on paper. He should be doing well. What stood out to you about him? What is his story tell us about this broader problem that we're talking about? Yeah. So he is not unemployed. He's not living on the streets. He has a job, a good paying job. He has stable housing. He is not living the middle class or even upper middle class lifestyle that he anticipated, given his profession, given the feeling that he did everything right. He's in his late 20s. He lives with his dad. He is in an outer suburb of Washington, DC. He's not in a particularly high, it's not like we're talking about San Francisco here. And I hear that over and over again from people.

You obviously have people on the real margins financially who are squeezed, who are in food bank lines, which are at record levels. Food banks across the country tell me, but even people who on paper seem like they're doing well, who don't show up in these dire economics statistics, feel like they cannot have that typical middle class lifestyle they anticipated can't take a trip, can't take their kids bowling, it costs them 40 bucks to go out for ice cream. They are stuck in housing. That's too small. They are not working because they can't afford childcare. They do not feel like they can even have that same life they had growing up when their parents had jobs that were maybe further down the economic spectrum or one of the parents stayed at home. That's what's really driving this frustration that I think you do not see in these economics statistics. To that end, Congressman, I want to get you a little bit to respond to something that has you said, because on paper, the economy looks better than it seems to feel to people, right? I mean, inflation is down, well, it's up from when President Trump took office, but it's

down from where it was during the Biden administration. Unemployment rate is low. The stock market is up. There's this disconnect on feelings. Republicans are very proud of the tax bill that the president put forward the no tax on tips, the tax on overtime, which isn't exactly that either, but it doesn't seem to have affected the vibes, the way people feel about the economy. Where do you think the disconnect is between what Republican control of Washington has accomplished and what people are feeling? Yeah, it's a great question. I think one of the things is you need to look globally at baseline. I mean, just over the last several years, the US economy has grown at a rate double that of the European Union and triple that of the UK. I mean, so one thing is, let's put things in perspective globally. But I think it's also important to recognize what people are feeling is real. I'm going to go back here to what I mentioned earlier. 21% growth and inflation during the Biden administration. That is a huge. It's unprecedented in my lifetime in terms of that rate of growth. And it is compounding. Now, actually brought up some issues that are really important for us to discuss, things

like Iran, things like the trade war effectively that's going on and data centers. But all three of those items, I think if we take a close look at them and if we go back to why, how do we design a system that's actually something that's going to provide durable, bipartisan, longer-term solutions? Number one, Iran, is there anyone, Republican or Democrat, that wants Iran to get a nuclear weapon? No. Because if they do, it's going to cause havoc and more problems across the globe. Do you think we'd be having a fundamentally different conversation about affordability right now if we were not still at war with Iran? I think that Iran has had the straight issues there. And of course, what's going on with the Houthis in Yemen right now is driving up energy costs. There's no doubt about it. But something that's important to keep in mind, some of the actions of the Trump administration both in the first and in the second, to unleash American energy sources, what that's done is it has actually insulated us to some degree. You want to be clear, to some degree, from global energy prices that has helped to protect us from some of the volatility and energy prices.

But of course, the Biden administration, they were actually pushing back against conventional American energy sources. And so look, it's a lot of digging out. But look, last point is this. I was looking at some statistics from United America. They show that nearly 90%, nearly 90% of house races are decided by 10% of voters that are the more fringe voters. It's how, through these party primaries, it's how we end up electing these more fringe candidates, which then you have these larger pendulum swings. Democrats want to do this. So they do this for four years. Republicans want to do this, do this for four years. You're not allowing the durability of solutions to actually work. And I think if you have a election reform process that incentivizes the right type of candidates, you can put the right strategies in place and leave them in place. We have had change election. We have had change election after change election in this country because people are frustrated. And I don't know if going out on the campaign trail and saying like at least we're doing better than France is a winning campaign message. But you do bring something up and I hear this all the time from our Republicans and I do want you to respond to this a little bit actually because Republicans will say look,

we inherited this problem from the Biden administration. And I do want to ask you to look back at the years of democratic control. Was there anything that Democrats left on the table when President Biden was in office when Democrats controlled Congress that you wish you could have done or maybe should have tried harder on that would put us in a different place on this affordability conversation now. Well, I mean, I can tell you, you know, I started day one in the White House and the Biden White House and we were in the middle of COVID and kids were not in school. The economy was not moving. There was no infrastructure that was left behind for us. There was no playbook. There was no sense of what happened. So that consumed two years if not longer of the attention. So what was in so if we're going to talk about what Trump inherited, we've got to talk about what we inherited to your point, Congressman, all these major swings. But you know, the pandemic was no one's fault. I mean, it wasn't Trump's fault is my point. The black swan did that. Right.

That was there was no sort of parties fault, right? You can't point finger at the other guy on that one. But what we can say is that the inflation that we that that you're talking about in the 21 percent during the Biden years was as a result of what we inherited. So let's put that on the table and let's be clear about that. I think in terms of what Biden was able to do, you know, I've been in this town as long as you have for about 25 plus years. And every year was there was an infrastructure week for almost 30 years. Infrastructure bill done to put trillions of dollars into our American cities and on the ground to start building America back up again. Then you've got the chips bill. You've got, you know, women economic bills that that were passed for four years. Really you only had two years because you had two years in COVID. Two years, what Biden was able to achieve that should have delivered almost short of immediate economic recovery was unprecedented.

You know, now you've got a situation where that stuff is being rolled back. The problem is what the congressman said. It is the sort of swings that we have on the political side on the extremes that undermine what could be very good policies to move this country forward. And I think Biden put many of those in place. Now what more could we have done on the economy? You know, I think, you know, when you're in the White House, part of what congress's job is to do is to be reactionary and not too aggressively proactive. But I think what he was able to accomplish again was unprecedented in terms of ability to move the economy forward. It is interesting that you have sort of Iran on the one hand on the Republican side. COVID on the other hand, it's like, oh, but not if not for this thing. What a different world we might be living in. I want to reset here a little bit and talk about how this is going to be. You know, Iran was a self-inflicted thing. So, I mean, but we will say that for another podcast. Yeah, that's coming up in our third hour. Right, exactly. Okay, so we know it's affordability stupid, but how are candidates actually addressing

this on the campaign trail? That's coming up after a quick break. Stay with us. Chevy is called the heartbeat of America for a reason with SUVs made to move with your rhythm. The versatile equinox tackles your entire day. The spacious traverse fits your crew and your whole weekend and tracks bring style with value you can count on. All infused with tech that has your back. So your drive always hits the right cord. Let's do the heartbeat. Adventure awaits in a new Chevy. Right now, get $500 bonus cash on select Chevy Tracks models. Plus, get 2.9% financing on all 2026 Tracks models. Together, let's drive at your Southern California Chevy dealers. Bonus cash is available on 2026 Chevy Tracks LT and active turns only 2.9% AP offered 36 months. Monthly payment is $2904 for every $1,000 new finance. Example on payment 11%. Must finance with GM Financial.

Some customers may not qualify, not available with lease and some of their offers. Take your retail delivery by 93026. Do you love hair raising allegedly true stories about the paranormal? Then you should summon the podcast, scared to death. It's the popular horror series with more than 60 million downloads to its name. And it's co-hosted by me, Dan Cummins. And me, Lindsay, co-host and also Dan's wife. Each week on Scared to Death, we share bone-chilling tales from old books and creepy corners of the web and even some submitted by our listeners all designed to make you want to sleep with the lights on. Think you can handle the horror? Tune in to Scared to Death every Tuesday at the stroke of midnight to find out. This is Angus Maximus. This partner has one pound of a pound of hot, juicy, cooked to water, angus feet. It's more expensive than a quarter pounder. The burger is closed. And for only $599, even regular juice can afford it. Like that guy. Give me that big old burger.

Yeah. The whole Angus Maximus, only $599 is cold senior. A bill for a limited time of participating restaurants, tax on included, not valid for use within a combo or in combination with any other offer or discount. I want to reset a little bit and talk about how some of this stuff plays on the campaign trail. And I want to listen to another voter that Shannon talked to. Another different Shannon, this from a woman named Jill, who you met, they're really highlighted the difference between the real economy and the felt economy. Let's listen. Yeah, I don't think there's a middle class anymore. We always heard a middle class was disappearing, but really, really quickly, the richer, getting richer and the rest of us are sinking quickly. You know, hearing my kids say they can't, they're never going to be able to buy a house. What the hell, that's the American dream. Congressman, I just think about someone who ran for office. When someone says they're losing the American dream, to me, that's like the bat signal for members of Congress, right? That's like the kind of thing you're supposed to be responsive to.

How do lawmakers square hearing from voters like Jill and the president talking about a golden age for America? Yeah, look, I think it's important to keep in mind that, and I'm going to say this is the third time here, that people really are feeling a squeeze. When I talk to people at home, they really do feel a squeeze. But we can sit here and blame the person that's right in front of them or we can look at the actual causation. And I'm going to say this a third time, 21% inflation. Because it was absolutely historic. What you saw Republicans do is come in and say, hey, you know what, we're going to make permanent tax cuts. We're going to, and if they had not done that, what have resulted in the largest tax increase in American history? Is it frustrating, on a purely political level, that that message doesn't seem to connect with voters? Oh, absolutely. If I were, and I've talked to Chairman Jason Smith, the other day about this, if I were in Congress, I'd be talking about this all day long, because every single Democrat voted against the bill, said another way, would have resulted in the largest tax increase on every American.

And they're out there claiming to be the savior of the bill. Pass rate. It did pass. Yeah. I mean, so what, where's the tax increase? Well, so my point is, is that I think it's, I think it's, I think it's somewhat challenging for Democrats to go out there and say they care about affordability whenever they actually voted effectively to cause the largest tax increase in American history. And I hear what you're saying, a tax increase that didn't happen is the dog that didn't bark in politics. It didn't happen because Republicans passed legislation came together and drafted a bill. Now look, is the bill perfect? No. But, but I do think that, you know, going back to your question, do people feel a disconnect? Yes. I think they feel a disconnect. Do they look at the people in power and say, you need to solve this? Yes, they do. But in many cases, this is a problem that has been caused from decades of flawed policy, decades of pendulum swings. And, and, and, and I think it's important for us to, to find policies where we can come together and look, talk about coming together. We're, we're, we're, we're focusing, beat up on the trade war all they want. I want to remind folks that when, when President Trump and his first term put tariffs in place,

President Biden kept them and actually added to a muscleer tariffs and other. On some of those Chinese tariffs, that's true. But I bet if President Trump or Republicans had called Ashley Etienne and said, we're running on a golden age of America in this environment, you would have probably told them what President Biden experienced, which was that telling people the economy is better than what they're feeling doesn't work. How did the experience in 2024? How should that inform Democrats running for election right now of the sort of that vibe to lived disconnect? Uh, or it should be informing Republicans, not really, really us. I mean, I think what you do is you utilize people like Shannon and Brandon. They're telling the story. Democrats don't have to tell the story. Brandon does fall into a statistic that talks broadly about the economy, which is that 25 million young people under the age of 25 are living at home. If buying a house was part of the American dream, but what we used to think is sort of the biggest jump starter of the economy, first home purchases, none of that is happening right

now because the economy is so bad. Things are so expensive. People can't afford to leave home, even an engineer. So you know, I think what an interesting tactic would be in that we're not really doing this as a party is doing more storytelling and let the American people tell the story. For you, you don't have to beat up on Donald Trump. You'd have to tell people what's what they're experiencing in their life and it's actually worse than what it was. Interestingly enough, though, what I think we should be doing is advancing a proactive agenda, an affirmative vision for where we want to take this country. It come November if we were to win. That has been partly shocking to me that my party has not come up with leadership. Come up with what that vision is. What's the counter argument to what Trump is doing? What's our plan to work in a bipartisan fashion to get this economy again and get bringing it out of his parents home? Shannon, I want to bring you in on that because you have been having these conversations. Help us, how do voters perceive this? Where do they lay the blame in this moment?

What do they want? Yeah. I mean, I think they blame it on a system that they feel like is broken and not working for them and across parties. Well, I covered the Trump White House. I covered two years of the Biden White House. And then for the past four years, I've been really focused on issues around the economy. It divides party. It divides who's in the White House. It's a systemic issue. Even before 2016, we still heard from voters about an economy that wasn't working for you, which we heard about when we covered the 2016 campaign. I'm not the political analyst expert here, but issues like tax bill is going to be hard to resonate with people because whatever savings they did or didn't get, again, they feel it is a rounding error. And they see corporations getting big tax breaks and reporting record profits while their wages are barely keeping up with inflation, if not falling behind inflation in some corners. That is the system that they see and they're in.

That woman Jill, you played some sound from a minute ago. I spoke to her at 7 a.m. outside of a plasma center in Phoenix, where she was going before work at a school district to sell her plasma for about $50. And she does that several times a week to cover the cost of her electric bill and her groceries because most of her check just goes to cover her rent. And so sometimes I think they feel like the messaging coming out of Washington is not getting at the bigger wider dire problem that their experience in their lives. I do think that's why you see so much the advertising that we're starting to see from some of these candidates in both parties running against a broken system or running against corruption. Those kinds of things can break through when you're in those situations. All right, we're going to take a quick break. Would we come back? What can or will the next Congress do about it? Chevy is called the heartbeat of America for a reason with SUVs made to move with your

rhythm. The versatile equinox tackles your entire day. The spacious traverse fits your crew and your whole weekend and tracks spring style with value you can count on. All infused with tech that has your back. Whether you're drive always hits the right cord. Adventure awaits in a new Chevy. Right now get $500 bonus cash on select Chevy tracks models. Plus get 2.9% financing on all 2026 tracks models. Together let's drive at your Southern California Chevy dealers. Bonus cash is available on 2026 Chevy tracks LT enacted terms only. 2.9% APR for 36 months. Monthly payment is $2904 for every $1,000 new finance. Example them payment 11%. Plus finance with GM financial some customers may not qualify not available with lease and some of their offers. Take your retail delivery by 9.3026.

Free music sports entertainment and more. Subscribe now and get 3 months free. Offer details apply. So we've talked about people being upset we've talked about the politicians making some of these promises out here. But we also want to talk about what the next Congress however it is ultimately made up can actually do to address some of these problems. And again to set the scene I want to play a little bit of an interview you did with a woman

named Jenna somebody who needs a little extra help from the government and let's listen to that. Well they shut down came and so the food stamp off it's in some of the paperwork to me. So if I never get paid work I can't put it out into the back. Plus I have heart issues and I have seizures and everything and I've been in and out of the hospital so I have a heart I'm giving to the food stamp off. For us it's the table people we supposed to be in the office for everybody else and I'm not getting anything. I'm going to be making a might so people on food assistance I mean this is kind of a core Washington responsibility is that a potential low hanging fruit for bipartisan work in the next Congress do you think. Well not food stamps necessarily but I mean there is a lot of areas there is I mean a severe food insecurity and hunger crisis going on millions of people I think it's at around five million people have lost food stamp benefits and in some areas like Arizona

where this woman was who's disabled she should still be qualified for her food stamps but she's caught in this bureaucratic hurricane that sort of happens since these new restrictions. So I mean there are definitely voters outside I mean in addition to this woman I spoke to someone else who was a Trump voter who says you know shame on me you know she's trying to work her company took a downturn and she was unable to you know make her rent got evicted I mean you know these stories go on and on really but there are voters out there being directly affected by this loss of food stamps and of course next year Medicaid I mean if you think people losing food okay they can go to the food bank what happens when you lose your health insurance what do you do you have a back at the emergency room so you know whether anybody likes to pay for this stuff or not it's it's still an issue out there that people are having to deal with. Congressman I saw something unusual today I saw a Republican Senate candidate Mike Rogers and Michigan running an ad about prescription drug prices and affordability.

Crossed Detroit River is Canada in Windsor this heart medication costs about 200 bucks a month here in Michigan the same prescription for a Michigan family costs $800 that's four times what the Canadians pay for the same drug. That's not typically an issue you see from Republican candidates I know the Trump White House is very proud of their work on prescription drug prices the Trump Rx program they call it they see that as a political winner is that something that if Republicans somehow manage to maintain control of one or both houses we could see more work on in the next Congress. I will I will tell you and I've had a consistent record on this I think that that prescription drug prices is one of those areas where there should be bipartisan consensus it's absolutely outrageous what's happened you can look at comparison to other countries and the United States is so out of whack with our not just prescription drug health care prices writ large certainly prescription drugs is one of the biggest drivers of that and it should be a bipartisan issue I think the president is should be commended for actually taking this issue on in the lot of not allowing status quo so yes absolutely should be bipartisan issue and like one of

the biggest things there you create this incredibly complex system that is so opaque and you get people that become experts on it and exploit every single corner to where they use this darkness as a way to overcharge people but when we're paying $10 for the same pill you can go to Mexico and get for 10 cents when it's made at the same exact place anybody who tries to stand up and defend that should be run over politically thank you for the clarification we're not encouraging violence on this podcast actually in the world in which Democrats take control of one or both houses there is an interesting opportunity here to get stuff done because president Trump is not someone who's particularly bound by ideological constraints I think that's a generous way to put it he'll be four ideas that he thinks are popular particularly if he thinks he can get the credit is there something we've talked about or something kind of on your to-do list where house or senate Democrats could make some progress on this issue and get a presidential signature yeah absolutely I think housing is a low hanging fruit issue for both parties could come together and actually do something on we saw housing reform bill already this Congress that actually moved right and so so I in bipartisan

in fact and so I think that there could be a great amount of opportunity there low hanging fruit high yield issue so so if we cannot agree if you've got a president again hate to continue to say this five times but I'm gonna say it five times because the congressman has said it's five times when you have a president saying a four-minute is a scam it's hard to say can we come together and do something for Shannon and Brandon can we do something to get these 25 million kids that are stuck in their parents homes out buying their first homes right and so that's that's really the barrier it's not that Shannon and Brandon's story don't exist because we know they do to your point Shannon it's all over the place excuse me Jill I was gonna let you finish and then I was gonna fix it no Shannon is struggling to if any of Shannon's or if any of Shannon's bosses are listening she can get I was like what am I talking about that Shannon not Jill Jill and Brandon's story I mean there's there's millions tons of Jill and Brandon's out there right now and so the point is is we could do

something but we first have to agree that they exist and that the problem may actually exist um you mentioned housing I want to give each of you a chance to kind of our lightning round last minute or two here is there another issue that perhaps we haven't talked about or need to highlight more where there could be bipartisan progress in the next congress congressman I'll let you start look I'll grab the three issues that actually brought up a number one I think on Iran I'll say it again we're probably gonna the democratic agree I ran shouldn't get a nuclear weapon it's in her we can come together and try and work from that basis on a plan moving forward on trade uh both president Trump and president Biden used tariffs as a tool I think it's completely ridiculous to have a country putting 150 percent tariff on our products whenever we don't put a single tariff on theirs coming in some of these trade wars they need to be reset recalibrated because they are in favor of the United States and one of the last ones that I think is really important is energy um energy issues we've watched these wildly different energy policies over the last few administrations I think it is a huge mistake we have great resources in the United States and we can actually use them in a way that will result in lower greenhouse gas emissions then then we've seen over the past few

decades the United States leads the world today in reducing emissions we can build upon those strategies by using American resources and I think it's something we should come together on rather than allowing us to be a partisan was it a mistake for the president to cut all the fun the funding that he has for renewable energy sources given the energy crunch we're in now um we are continuing record deployment of things like solar in the United States I think that just like Bill Gates has said that you can't continue to subsidize some technologies that have been around for 50 years by acting like their new technologies and you have other countries that don't subsidize and still have amazing deployment and I'll say it again just like solar today despite the fact that you've seen a rollback or recalibration of some of these subsidies you were seeing record deployment uh which I think proves that in some cases subsidies weren't needed actually I'm one thing I'm surprised we haven't talked about other congressmen mentioned it briefly were the tariffs do you think democrats if they're at control of the house and or senate might try to more aggressively rollback the tariffs as an affordability measure yeah I mean I think it's it's low hanging fruit I

would definitely aim there and I would go even further to say that democrats should should with their oversight and investigative powers try to see if they can get some of that one uh 115 billion dollars that corporations got back because of these tear wars that the american people paid for on their backs but end up lining the pockets of these corporations so you know my advice to uh you know the the incoming chairman of the oversight committee I think is mr. Garcia I would seriously look into whether or not that's possible and how you can do that at the very least it would speak to the american people in a way that that some of these policies do not because they feel like these corporations are winning and they're actually losing these corporations are winning at their actual expense and I think tariffs is one of those prime examples of that shannon you get the last word on this based on the people you've talked to where would where would action from washington be the most meaningful well I mean housing you mentioned is is a big one I don't know

there's much washington do on that they need more housing building and more housing inventory high energy prices aren't helping that I mean a lot of construction resources are being shifted to AI and data centers which is our our also not happening but more systemic issues but it's this growing income inequality divide that I mean I I know that's the whole you know DSA Bernie Sanders wing platform they're talking about it I don't know if there's another bipartisan uh side of that um but the people I talk to see this growing income divide this k-shaped economy they see the people at the very top getting enormously wealthy and corporations doing incredibly well and record stock prices and they're not part of that and there is a lot of um anger and frustration out there on that front I have no idea what the bipartisan solution to that is but I think people would appreciate some acknowledgement of the growing income inequality on on a bipartisan basis might be helpful all right we've got to leave it there shannon congressman gare graves ashley etian thank you for joining us today thank you thank you okay so whether left right or center affordability is an

issue that most Americans agree needs to be addressed but for democrats there's an issue dividing candidates inside the party israel you can criticize israel and not be anti-Semitic you can be an anti-sionist and not be anti-Semitic to take out frustration or opposition to what another country's government is doing on american citizens who are only affiliated to that country based on religion is outright discrimination for that I'm going to be speaking with haruk habash she's a former Biden administration official in the founder of a new policy a group that advises democratic candidates on israel as well as democratic congressman dan goldman of new york about democrats divergent viewpoints on israel that's coming up next saturday on here's the scoop election edition remember you can subscribe to the show on apple podcast spotify youtube or wherever

you listen or watch so you don't miss it our show was produced by carol and kenny and a man of ill-wellen erica huang and bobby carlisto engineered with support from jeska fenton and jacob content katariochum is executive producer of here's the scoop and shalani sharma is the senior vice president of content development at nbc news i'm garrard hake cya next weekend this partner has one pound of a pound of hot sushi cooked to honor angus feet it's more expensive a quarter pounder the burger of clothes and for only five ninety nine even regular juice can afford it like that guy give me that big old burger yeah the whole angus max on us only five ninety nine the cold senior available for a limited time of participating restaurants tax on included not valid for use within a combo or in combination with any other offer or discount

More episodes

More from Meet the Press

View all episodes →