What (In The World) Is Going On? #5

0:30Welcome everybody in WCZRadio.com, Channel 1's down the rabbit hole. It's the midweek edition. I'm Big D. Thanks for listening in. Appreciate that. Today we are going to do another edition of What in the World is Going On. Have a lot of news stories, a lot of odd stories that don't fit an entire show. But they're interesting and they relate to it. So if you've been paying attention to the podcast and or the news, you're hearing things. Probably going to touch some of that. And maybe some things you haven't heard. We're going to go through some data center news. We have AI news that I think is quite shocking. Bill Gates talking about the end of the world. And oh, speaking of the end of the world, are we corigning towards November 13th? That being predicted a long time ago as being the end of the world.

1:35And NASA's also chiming in, they are predicting the end of the world. So we're going to talk a little bit later about, is this the end? This could be the last podcast. I mean, maybe we have about a month left. We will look into it, see what it's all about, and go from there, make preparations, whatever we need to do. But before we do that, want to remind you, as always, you can email us at downtherh at protonmail.com, downtherh at protonmail.com and big thanks to everybody over there at Friends Radio Network, the people who host Friends Radio, people who provide the app, and all of those of you who listen on the Friends Radio Network. Thank you very much. We appreciate it. We get together and we do this about once a month. This, what in the world is going on? We're going to roll through several stories. So if you're bored by one, just skip forward or hang in there. There's another one coming up shortly. But we're going to start everything off today in the AI world,

2:39because I was getting several emails about the big story, this individual named Jacob Coxon. And this was on September 9th here in 2026, where he talked about resigning from anthropic. He was saying that people who are building AI believe that it could kill all of us by the end of the decade. And several of you emailed and said, I can't believe you're not covering this story. Well there's a reason I didn't jump on this story because, I didn't believe it when it came out. And I believe it even less so now because something seemed very off about this. And I think it's been covered very, very well. I'm not going to go into all the details. Let's just say that Jacob Coxon also has an interest in everybody being freaked out by AI supposedly decimating the population of the Earth by the end of the decade.

3:39It seemed to me that this was a publicity stunt. That's what it appeared from the beginning. I believe that's what it is. And if you would like to go further into that, I can send you several articles that really go into the minutia of who's this Jacob Coxon, why he said it, what are the ramifications of it, and why we shouldn't believe it. It basically boils down to a lot of the AI companies, especially the big ones, are doing this sort of fake where they're asking for regulations, but the regulations safeguard them from any kind of outside sources, suing them or competing against them because they're already well established and they want to be at the top of the heap. Coxon works for a competing company and it's all business related. Yet they're playing on the fears of everybody, which are legitimate. I don't like AI.

4:40I think that's been well established here. I've presented my case multiple times why we should not be involved in AI. Why I think AI is an extreme net negative. But this story just something smelled funny and I wanted to let it play out. And so here we are again, if you're really, really interested in going down that and you haven't heard all the news around it, I'd be glad to send that to you. What I do find interesting though in this vein, because with AI comes all of the data centers, everything we're hearing about data centers are all AI centric. This is where they store the information. This is where AI gathers its information from in order to give you an answer or create things or whatever it's doing. So of course we need to have data centers everywhere because data is the gold. It's the new gold. A lot of pushback. I don't like data centers. And it's not for the reason that most people are against it.

5:41A lot of people are talking about, well, it's the water usage and it's noise and so forth. Your city uses more water on golf courses, high school football fields and lawns around the city property than an AI data center does. So that to me is a false narrative. Yeah, it's concerning. We don't need big corporations just sucking up all the water and electricity. Okay, that's there. But the real reason that AI data centers or the data centers are a net negative is because of all the information they're collecting on us that they need to store. The profiles they're creating, everything you buy, everything you do and look out online, what you watch, where you go, anything that's tracking you, tracing you, that's collecting data, they must store it. They're out of storage so they have to continue to create these data centers.

6:46They're in lies the danger. You can talk about flat cameras, which we will at some point here today. They get their information from these AI data centers. These are the future hubs of what potentially could be the complete undoing of our society as far as privacy, tracking, tracing and social credit score system and everything. No money, it'll all be digital. This is the setup. So why then would data centers, if they are not that big of deal, be fighting back against everybody who is opposing them? Case in point, in Pennsylvania, there's multiple data centers like everybody else who are wanting to be built there. These data center developers are going around and trying to incentivize the local homeowners by giving them a $10,000 check if they will back off on the opposition and vote for it to

7:53allow it to get approved. Have we seen this before? This incentivization thing. Oh, the COVID shot comes to mind. Hey, get yourself a donut, get yourself a college scholarship, get yourself a hamburger, whatever it is, come on in because you know we can't sell it to you on its merits. If they straightforward, here are the parameters of this project. Here is what it does. Here is what it entails to run it. They lose that argument. So what do you do? You try to incentivize it. And that's what we have going on here. Wall Street Journal first reported. They found that residents were split on the idea of bringing in these data centers. This company called North Point Development wants to build a 1,300 acre data center near Hazel Township, Pennsylvania. And according to the article to smooth the way the company has offered roughly 4,500 households

8:58a $10,000 check each payable only if the facility is approved. These letters started showing up in June. The median household income in this area is 60,000. So that's a good chunk of change. That's a lot of money for anybody who's living in this area. And it's designed for them to think twice about selling out their vote or their approval, buying their opposition to go away. There's only one reason why this would happen. It's because they cannot sell this to the locals with a straightforward argument. The locals don't want it. They know it won't get approved. So let's buy them off. It's a tried and true trick. And I hope that they back off on that. But this is where we're at with these AI data centers. A lot of push back on them. So now they are trying to figure out, okay, well, how do we push back against the resistance?

10:00And this is one of the things that they are looking at. What these data centers do, as I mentioned earlier, is they are the ones who fuel AI and AI images, answers, and so forth. I have had friends of mine who say it's no big deal. AI is no big deal. It's not going to take everybody's jobs. It helps me. I save time. We've gone over all of that. So here's a story, and this is a case in point. This story takes place in Saginaw, Michigan. An individual named Jane Smith, who was a CEO of the Family First Credit Union, has been fired. Why? Well she and her family decided to take a trip to Halifax, Nova Scotia, which is up in Canada. If you've been paying attention to the news, Trump has renamed Lake Ontario to Lake

11:01America. It's not official. I think it's just a meme. Well, there's a picture of this lady with her husband and two other people. They're at the airport, and they're wearing sweatshirts, and they're just these blue sweatshirts, and it says Lake America across the top, and there's an anchor and some like waves there. There's no picture of the lake. There's no map, and there they are. They're in this waiting area at an airport. She posts this picture and says, hey, isn't this funny? We're going to Canada. We have our Lake America sweatshirts on. And then she follows up with Not sure Canada will think that's funny or like our sweatshirts. In Facebook, people see this. They get upset. They contact Family First Credit Union. They interned Fire, Jane Smith. Here's the big problem.

12:03This is an AI-generated photo. They were not actually wearing these sweatshirts. And I'm going to go out and say, even if they were, how is this a fireable offense? I lived in an area where we had American Lake. That was the name of the lake. American Lake. There were T-shirts you could buy that said American Lake. There's no map on here. There could be a Lake America, I don't know in Michigan, or in Idaho, or in Florida. No, this doesn't even exist. These sweatshirts are not real in this photo. Do you think anybody cares? No, she's still fired because she posted a photo using an AI image which she thought would be cute or funny. Wasn't the Canadians who got upset, although maybe. No, it was those in America who took offense to this and hammered this First Family Credit

13:05Union who interned fired her. AI has many, many dangers. And that's why I say you need to be very careful how you approach, use, and interact with AI. This is a case in point. This is a crazy story. I was shocked when I saw it. I hope she gets a lawyer and sues them into tomorrow. How can you be fired over a shirt that doesn't exist, that you created using AI, it's an image that's not even real. It's not racist, it's not horrible, it's just blue sweatshirts, that's a lake America. You think I'm wrong? Email me. I'd be glad to talk to you about that. I think it's ridiculous. Got an email from a friend of mine, Mike who is, he lives around here and we get together here and there. He sent me an article about flock cameras here in Texas and flock cameras are still in

14:07the news. They're still upset about flock cameras. There's pressure being put on local units of palaties all across the states to get rid of these things. Headline Texas Freezes Flot Camera Approvals, the Texas Department of Transportation has suspended approvals for flock cameras along state-owned roadways. Here's the problem. Most people did not even know that they had been approved or even thought about in the first place. And this is the problem that we're having around the United States. And as you dig deeper into this, sure, they're going to suspend these flock camera approvals, but this is only on state roads. It says thousands of flock cameras operate across Texas with local governments using the technology to assist law enforcement investigations. Ex-automated license plate reader system captures vehicle images and license plate data

15:09that participating agencies can search for law enforcement purposes. And we go back and listen to that episode where we talked about it. We know that's not true and we know that's a big problem. So beware of what your local government is doing with these flock cameras. According to this article, it says Greg Abbott has suspended the issuance of permits for flock cameras and other automatic license plate readers on state-owned roads. Text. Said its role is limited to reviewing permits to ensure license plate readers are installed safely correctly. The agency noted it does not have access to the data collected by the cameras, which is a lie. That's a complete untruth. I don't even know why they would put that statement in there. So the flock cameras are a thing. There was a story I shared a while back where the city council in order to skirt having to get local approval, they approved a $1 under the minimum amount that could be used for

16:17flock cameras. Therefore, then it could just be approved by the city council. Didn't have to go to a vote. This is how they're trying to get around it. They want them in. I'm not sure what Greg Abbott's ultimate stance on this. I'm glad that he's at least taking a stand, but that's not stopping any of the private entities or your local community or your local town as long as it's now not on a state road, which would be a highway or anything that's maintained by the state. I would like to see this a statewide ban, but that hasn't happened yet. Our good friend Bill Gates is back in the news. Haven't heard from him for a while. Of course he has been a climate doomer for a long time. He was worried about the population. He's been worried about everything related to individuals around the world, not having babies. Of course he was very big on the COVID and the vaccine and everything. Bill is on to a new mission.

17:20He's very concerned. Bill Gates warns, according to this article, that AI could cause a billion deaths without government control. I think this goes back to our first story. According to this NBC release excerpts Friday of Gates interview, Microsoft co-founder said AI is certainly powerful enough to drive events that you know cause a billion deaths. Bill Gates is always about doom and gloom. We know this. That's how he thrives, scaring people into his products. He went further on describing the dangers of AI falling into the wrong hands. Quote, even though it's pretty hard to get to 100%, there's never been a weapon as powerful as the combination of people with ill intent using the latest AI tools. Absolutely, you are correct, Bill. However, what he wants is for him to control it.

18:20All these AI companies who are jockeying to be top of the heap, they want to have the government contracts, they want to be the big boy on the block, they want to be the Google of the AI world where they control everything and it's basically a monopoly. These guys are all jockeying for this and they're asking the government to protect them by using this tactic of billions of people are going to lose their lives. So we've gone from everyone's going to lose their job. This was the talk a couple of years ago. AI is going to wipe out so many jobs, nobody's going to have a job. To now, it's just going to wipe you out, period, you're going to die. He goes on to say that governments and political parties need to set aside their differences and act now before AI risks spiraling out of control. He was talking to some industry and tech leaders and then you get right down into the details of it. He's heavily invested in AI and he wants those companies protected.

19:25So a lot of this stuff that's coming out about the dangers of AI actually aren't about the real dangers of AI. This is where you have to read through the story, not the headline because a lot of people go, wow Bill Gates is on our side. He's on our side. He knows he's well aware now. He's scared of AI too. No, he's building AI. Why do you think he's putting that statement out there because he knows if he controls AI, well this could potentially be him and it wouldn't surprise me if that wasn't his ultimate goal as we have seen multiple times with his vaccines and all the crazy stuff he does around the world. He has no problem dropping a billion people. Works right into his eugenics plan, right into depopulation and right into all of the things that he has shown us over the years. So would this be categorized as predictive programming?

20:28Maybe I think there's a high likelihood. I don't know that for a fact, but I can tell you right now Bill Gates is not really worried about AI killing a billion people. Thought this was interesting, sticking in the AI world. Headline Tennessee grandmother sues Fargo City and police after spending six months in jail over AI, mistaken identity. City of Fargo, North Dakota now faces a legal lawsuit of a Tennessee grandmother that alleged police improperly relied on AI facial recognition to accuse her of bank theft and jailed her for six months. And this happened last year. Problem was this grandmother never stepped foot in Fargo, let alone North Dakota. In fact, according to the lawsuit, she was extradited to face charges. She never even flown on a commercial flight.

21:28But trust AI, trust AI everybody, this is an individual. I hate to laugh. I hope she wins a ton of money. She was detained in Tennessee for several months and then brought to North Dakota. The charges were ultimately dropped. She was released on Christmas Eve after her attorney presented bank records showing that she was in Tennessee at the time of the alleged crimes. Did that stop anybody? Did anybody stop for a moment and say, well, this seems weird that we're having to go to Tennessee and find a grandmother and extradited her back to North Dakota based on AI facial recognition. This is actually a very creepy and sad and I think frightening story. It's grandma in Tennessee.

22:28She's hanging out. She gets a call one day or the cops show up and say, come with us. You have been ID'd as somebody who robbed a bank in another state and off you go. And then the onus is on you to disprove it. This is why I highly recommend that when you go to an airport or you go to a ball game now or you go anywhere where they ask you to look into the camera. Oh, it's going to take a picture. We don't store it. We delete it at the end of the day. I hear this all the time. Well, yeah, off that machine. So the machine you're looking into, yeah, they delete that data. But the data that it collects has already been transferred off to the AI data center that they're building everywhere. And then you are now part of the facial recognition, the optic recognition. And they get really irritated when you say to them, I am not going to do that.

23:31I have ID right here. You can look at it. I have a driver's license. I have a passport. I have whatever it is. We've gotten along fine up till now without me looking into this camera and getting my picture taken. Don't let them bully you out of it. You have that right. You have that option. And they will also tell you things like, well, there's cameras everywhere. You know, you're being taken pictures of it. Okay, but not that machine. Yeah, you might see me on a security camera or surveillance camera or something. But that machine that they're asking you to look into ends up in stories like this. And that's a sad, sad state of affairs. Little while back, we did an episode that I still think to this day, I haven't counted it up. But we got the most response for the voice to skull episode we did than any other episode.

24:32I don't think it's the most listened to episode, but we have had more emails from people who listen to that regarding the V2K voice to skull. So I've been going back down the rabbit hole on this wondering why it's such an interest. And what did we tap into there? And I ran across this, which is unbelievably stunning. It is called Holosonic Directional Audio, the voice inside your head. Holosonic is a company founded by a doctor Joseph Pompey, graduate of the MIT Institute Technology. He runs Holosonic Research Labs. Holosonic has developed this technology and they did demonstrate this for everybody to see. It's been around since the 2000, been working on this directional speaker system.

25:39And they call it highly direction audio spot like speaker system. You can look this up on YouTube. You can watch it being demonstrated. These Holosonic speakers use ultrasound technology to create a sound at very narrow beams, like a light beam, typically around five degrees. The sounds emitted by these speakers are very targeted and can be described as kind of a 3D. It makes these messages sound as if they are coming from inside your own head. In one of the videos I watch where they're demonstrating this thing, they set them up in grocery stores and at different stores and had people walk around. Now they put little dots on the floor that you would go stand there. And in one of the messages it says, hi, you can hear me, can't you? You're the only one. Look around. No one else can. Know who I am. I'm your inner voice. Now I want to talk to you about something really important, fair trade.

26:44Look at all those bananas in front of you. So many to choose from. Which should you buy? I know. And so do you. They're all good bananas. But you need the fair trade ones. So now you know which ones to choose, make a good choice. The individual is standing there, hearing this, people standing right beside them and around them do not hear this. It is a directional thin line laser audio that basically sounds like it's coming inside your head. According to the Foundry says, messages from your own consciousness that no one else can hear. That's how they describe this sound. According to this Holosonic Audio Spotlight technology, it's seamless and so targeted that you can only hear it if you are in the range. Not only that, but due to the lack of regulation on this new technology, companies don't even have to notify you that they are using this tech to influence you to make decisions on a

27:45day to day basis that benefits them. According to another example, this took place in New York. There was a New Yorker named Allison Wilson. She was walking down Prince Street and so how she heard a woman's voice right in her ear, asking, who's there? Who's there? She looked around to find that no one was in her meetings, her roundings. Then the voice said, it's not your imagination. The voice was not hers. She wasn't sure if it was her imagination. It was an ad for paranormal state, which is a ghost theme television series on A and E. They were testing out this Holosonic sound system on the people of New York as they walked by and as they were waiting at the corner, waiting for the light to change or standing in front of a storefront, maybe reading a paper, standing still, they would basically point

28:46a gun at them or the laser beam and nobody else can hear it except for the person that the laser is zeroed in on. And Holosonic is not the only one who's working on this as I dug down this rabbit hole American technology, which is now named LRAD Corporation LRAD. They're working on it. Another organization called XMOS. There's also Panfonics and a few others, but those are the big ones. If you go to the Panfonics website, this is their quote, quote, with traditional speakers, the most common solution to all problems is often to play them louder. Humans will not react to sound volume, but become numb very quickly to any sound level that maintains the same. With directional audio, the idea is to create changes in the volume levels around the area to create a reaction in a person's behavior. You need to create an environment where the sound levels vary and surprise the person with volume, content, and direction.

29:47Also according to Panfonics, quote, a person can focus only on one audio source at a time. It is possible with directional audio to occupy a person's interest to select audio in a precise position, even make them stop and turn their head to a desired direction. And this is what people are working on. Again, they don't have to let you know that the ears being used. I have seen these being used in museums and in libraries and places where you stand and you're looking at, you're reading the display and they have these, but they're not quite on this level. What we're talking about here with this hollow sonic is truly bizarre and creepy. You can be walking around or you can be in a theater or you can be on a bus or you can be in a driverless car, taxi cab, and this thing will resonate in your head.

30:55You're actually hearing it through your ears, but it doesn't appear so. It rattles around in your brain. So you don't know, am I thinking this? Am I hearing this? Am I crazy? Right now from what I've seen, it has been fairly tame messages, like I said about bananas. They were advertising a TV show, but this could get very, very dark and very, very dangerous quickly because there are no regulations on this. They don't have to warn you that it's being used. They don't have to warn you that they've done it to you. I don't hear Bill Gates or anybody else talking about how this is dangerous and we should all be looking out for this because this could literally make people crazy. Think they're hearing voices, hearing things, suggestions, and as the panphonic say, we can make you turn your head, looking certain directions, and we can actually get to a point where we control you, which is the ultimate goal of all of this to control us from outside

31:58of ourselves. It's the hacking of the human body. This is the attempted takeover of our own humanity and our own residency in our body. They want to tap into your psyche. They want to tap into your conscience. They want to tap into your soul. They know you're there because you're present. You have a body. What they want is they want to know what you're thinking. They want to know where you're going. They want to control that. How you think, how you buy your actions, compliance, and the list goes on. Look into it. Hollow Sonic directional audio. It is wild. So let's look into the end of the world because apparently it is coming out. Very fat. Will it be AI? Will it be sounds in our head? Will it be facial recognition? All these things seem to be heading in the same direction.

32:58So now we have people coming out and saying, oh, yeah, we're there. NASA, according to this article, NASA supercomputer predicts the world may end sooner. Now, that's the headline. There's another headline I have. NASA supercomputer predicts exact year world will end. It's half of the previous estimates. So they love to put this stuff out. They love to sensationalize these headlines. According to this article, they say it's no great surprise that the Doomsday clock is closer to midnight than ever. Partly because of all the stuff that's gone on in the world. And we have a AI climate change, nuclear war, and our planet still has a limited lifetime span. So they fed all this into the big supercomputer and all the problems that they see going on with the world and all the potential that's going on with the world. According to this, it says, the research published in scientific journal, Natural Geoscience,

34:04suggests that instead of two billion years before the Earth's self-destructs and everybody goes, we have a luxurious one billion years. So it's been cut in half. They were saying 5, 10, 15, 20 years ago, no, we have a couple of billion years before the Earth burns up and it crashes into the sun or it just implodes because of all the problems in the climate and everything. Well now they're saying, no, no, no, emergency broadcast here. That's been cut in half. We actually have one billion. According to this, the estimate from NASA's computer puts our inevitable instinction sometime in the year, one billion, two thousand and twenty one. Now, there's a lot of, there's a lot of what ifs and assumptions here about mankind and

35:05about the planet and about everything else. So what they do is they feed in worst case trajectories, all the things that they think are wrong or bad, not giving any kind of leeway for innovations, solutions, all the things that come with progress. They never put that in to the equation. Therefore they put the worst of the worst in there and then it spits out of the quote, super computer. However, here's the problem. If AI takes over and if AI is gathering all this information in the data and AI, it does at some point become a super intelligence or sentient, which is what they're talking about. The God computer and the ultimate consciousness and the ultimate knowledge, what would stop it from learning this aspect from the super computer that NASA has and saying, well, I mean, if it's that bad, well, we're just going to act accordingly and we can even

36:06ramp that up even more. I don't know. I'm just thinking outside the box. So who knows? Now there's a lot of chatter right now all around social media, which I'm not on, but I've been hearing in articles and it's become a sensationalized date. That is November 13th, 2026. And this has been spread all over by tick tockers, but what you're not hearing from this is the information that they are conveniently leaving out of this, which completes the story. Here's the story. There was a man who was an Austrian born physicist. He worked at the University of Illinois in Urbana. And in 1960, with his colleagues Patricia Mora and Lawrence Amiad, he published a short

37:07paper in the journal Science with a title of Doomsday, Friday the 13th November, AD, 2026. This precise day was more of a, as they're saying, a wink, not a warning. The 13th of November is this von Forster's own birthday. And it's also Friday the 13th, which carries, of course, the connotations of being a spooky day and an unlucky day and so forth. So what were they doing? Why did they do this? Was this just a big punk? Was it a lark? No, actually, they did an experiment where they looked at how population doubles every so many years. Particularly at a steady pace driven by two numbers, the birth rate and the death rate. The model that they created leans on this assumption, which they call the Garden of Eden,

38:09which has endless food, no environmental threats, or no harm done by crowding. They figured that as the population swells, each individual gets less food, there's more competition. Therefore, the growth rate should slow. Van Forster and his colleagues made a bold counterbett, humans, they argued, talk, cooperate, invent, form coalitions, which are large enough that our whole species can be treated as one team playing a single game against nature. They came up with this term called hyperbolic growth. In exponential growth, the doubling time never changes. If it takes 50 years for a population to double today, it still takes 50 years to double a century from now. This is what they call steady predictable patient. Now there's hyperbolic growth that has a shrinking doubling time.

39:10Hyperbolic growth is very different. Every time it doubles, the time keeps shrinking so each generation arrives faster than the last. And it's as if the species were sprinting and accelerating at once. Van Forster, Moira and Amiak gathered 24 estimates of world population stretching from the time of Christ to 1958, fitted their hyperbolic to the data. And what they came out with was that there was a singularity year of AD 2026, November 13th, and October 25th. So they thought, well, we'll just pick a date and we'll have a little humor with it. And they basically published this paper. So now this paper sat there for years. This was done in 1960, so it's been there 65 years. January 31st, 2025, physicist Victor Jakavinko of the University of Maryland published an

40:13open access follow up to this in a journal called Physica A. According to him, across the span, the human family grew from about 4.5 million to 8.062 billion, a leap of more than 1,000 fold. And Jakavinko found out that this climb was in a smooth one. It came in four distinct chapters. And there's a mathematical figure to this. When Jakavinko fitted the modern hyperbolic that he created to the data from the other one, his singularity landed on 2030. So that would be within the window of the 5.5. What they're not telling you through this entire thing is that this is not the destruction of the earth. This is just their prediction of when the earth will meet its max population on the surface of the earth singularity. So there will be all the people that the earth can handle, all the people that the earth

41:18can sustain, all the people that we can grow food for, all the people that the water will handle. It's a projection. It's a model. And this has been made with, I mean, crude data from the 60s, also made up numbers, also numbers that are just rounded up, rounded down. It's much like people who predict the date of, I'll say the rapture, where they go through and they think they have the code. This was actually just an exercise with a little bit of humor involved in it, but it has been latched on because of course we're getting close. June November 13th, 2026, it really means nothing. We're not there. We're not going to get there. It's not happening in the next few months. What a lot of these models don't take into consideration, and I'll go back to our last topic is adjustments, innovation, human ingenuity.

42:20Population doesn't always grow. We have always gone through cycles throughout history of growth rate, slow down rate, as far as people having babies. And right now it's popular not to have kids because we want to save the planet and it's expensive and so forth. This isn't the first time this has happened. There's been multiple times in history where there was a huge slow down of the birth rate where they were concerned that the human race was going to literally disappear. So we have both sides of this coin, this November 13th. So when you see the scary TikTok video or the video on X where they're warning you that scientists are telling you that the end of the world is coming on November 13th, it's clickbait. It means nothing and I'll be glad to send you these articles. Look it up yourself. It's actually a fascinating read.

43:21What they were working on, how they came up with their conclusions, and the date that they picked. But it's not the science. It's not scientists predict. They weren't predicting anything. It was a random number that they came up with saying we could be off by 5, 5 and a half years. We don't even know. There's a lot of variables we didn't throw in there. And this has been a consistent pattern with all the doomsdayers. And I will say it's the same thing with AI. I don't think AI is going to wipe out the human race. I think AI by itself will be used by other people to do great harm. I don't believe AI is just going to wake up one day and mow everybody down. I just don't see that happening. Could it? Well, sure. A huge meteor could hit the earth in a couple of days and we're all gone anyway. So anything is possible. Just looking at the patterns, looking at what's being said, looking what's being worked on. There are greater dangers. And I think these are put out there to distract everybody.

44:24Oh my gosh. The world's ending. Oh my, AI is going to kill a billion people. Oh no. AI is going to kill everybody by the end of the decade. Why? How is that going to happen? How is that going to happen? And what would that benefit AI? What would that benefit the scientists if we were all wiped out? And again, this has been going on since the beginning of time. Scientists and astrologers have talked about stars wrecking the earth, meteor showers, blasting the earth, us getting too close to the sun, getting too far away from the sun. None of it has come true fruition. Will it one day? Probably. It's just not going to be November 13th. I can guarantee you that. I'd love to hear your feedback on this. I enjoy these episodes because I get to share all these little snippets of news and things that I set aside that I find interesting that actually relate to topics that we've talked about and we bring up new stuff like the sound that's coming at you like a laser.

45:28I'm going to go deeper into that. I'll probably do an entire show on that. Maybe Brandon and I will tackle it at some point. If you would like any of these stories or any kind of follow up on this email me down the RH at protonmail.com, down the RH at protonmail.com, Brandon and I will be back on Sunday with a brand new episode in the meantime. Hope everybody has a great week. I'm Big D and I'm out of here.