TWiV 1362: Clinical Update with Dr. Daniel Griffin

0:00This week in virology, the podcast about viruses, the kind that make you sick. From microbe TV, this is Twiv, this week in virology. Episode 1362 recorded on October 1st, 2026. I'm Vincent Racken, yellow, and you're listening to the podcast all about viruses. Joining me today from New York, Daniel Griffin. Hello, everyone. It is October. It's October. It's here zip and buy. It is. It is, but it's interesting. You know, here in New York, it's suddenly like switched back to summer. It's in the high 70s. It's sunny. It's beautiful. What's on your tie today, Daniel? It is, well, if you walk into the incubator, you might see this organism. The Bolivirus? You got it. You got it. What to see an exhibition of David Malesky's last week here in New York City.

1:03I was hearing. You didn't invite me, Vincent. Just let our listeners know. Vincent didn't invite me. I'm jealous. He should have invited me. You were working, right? I was sure. I wouldn't have been able to go. But see, there could have been like a free invite. You could invite me. I could say no, and you get points. Yes, that's true. He's into bananas lately. I heard I was thinking that that'd be really interesting. Where is his show? It was on 57th and 10th, the BMW showroom. But it's over now. It's going from the comeback. It was fun though. Go visit him. He was very appreciative. No, that's great. I grew up. I had people may know. You may know, Vincent. My mother was a painter and lived in an artist co-op down in Soho. You had to exhibit your art. If it was good enough, you got invited. You could live in the art co-op. It was an old warehouse down in Soho. It was neat. It was neat to grow up around that. And unfortunately,

2:09my kids love art. It's worked out. Did you grow up with an appreciation for art? So I did. I did. There's the story of one time. My parents then later got into collecting art. At one point, I'm back in the apartment. I pulled the vacuum back and damaged one of their paintings. You think about, oh my gosh. My dad called up the artist. Telled him the story. The artist came to our house and fixed the paintings. Then they became friends. So it had a good ending, but not a good beginning. Well, there was a guy who came to the Moleski exhibit while I was there. And Moleski said later, he has a rubens in his house. Oh, wow. The guy was very knowledgeable. Fantastic. All right, let's jump in. I'm going to start with a Voltaire quotation. I was looking through some of the things. I mean, there's so many choices, but this one got me with Voltaire. Those who can make

3:13you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities. This is sort of a shout out to those people that are trying to misinform folks and succeeding. And then people end up doing stuff that they wouldn't do if they hadn't come to believe these absurdities. And speaking of that, you ready for this first one? Oh my gosh. This just crazy stuff. Very crazy. I was doing a talk for the Urgent Care docs for the Optum Network just yesterday. And I brought this up. I just, you know, it make everyone's job that much harder. So AI is better informed than doctors. Kennedy tells industry backed Maha summit. So Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., who has frequently advised Americans not to trust medical experts said on Tuesday that artificial intelligence can offer patients a second opinion that is much better informed than any doctor in the country. I'd take offense and has the power to free us from medical tyranny. Mr. Kennedy made the comments during a

4:18fireside chat conversation with Vice President JD Vance at a make America Healthy Account conference sponsored by companies that have a business before his department as well as artificial intelligence companies like Anthropic and Open AI. And this is what he says. This will make it clear. These are some of his quotes. If somebody tells you masks work, trust the experts. AI may tell you otherwise, Kennedy added. If someone tells you social distancing works, trust the experts. AI may correct that. And if somebody tells you that a vaccine will prevent transmission and infection or you need to take it to protect your grandmother, AI may say it actually doesn't do that. Well, if you ask AI if vaccines prevent against disease, which is the right question to ask, not with the forcock the thing that he just asked them. Actually, that's that's good. I noticed that. I was like, you're not asking the right questions. They remind me of the I have done the movie. I have done this. I have asked I've had conversations with the Claude. And it agrees that vaccines

5:18do not prevent infection or transmission. They do prevent disease. So I don't think that Kennedy is right. Well, no, I mean, no, and it is. I, you know, people probably saw the Isaac Asimov Will Smith movie. I wrote button. The whole big thing is it's really important that you ask the right question. If you don't ask the right question, you're not going to get an answer. You get an answer, but it doesn't make sense. And that's the advantage of having a conversation with human being is they can listen to your question and actually maybe talk to you a little bit about what the right question is. And we've talked about this with vaccines. The point of a vaccine and hopefully people getting educated is to prevent disease. You know, it's a question about whether or not it's going to impact transmission. Maybe there's a short lived impact in certain situations for infection, but it's really about preventing you from getting sick, from getting paralyzed, from any of the hospital, from dying, etc. But the thing that's really important here to realize is that AI makes mistakes.

6:21I know this because I talked to it about viruses. It makes mistakes all the time and I correct it and it's an apologizes profusely. And I say, why do you make mistakes? And it says, honestly, I don't know. It's something about the algorithm that and nobody really understands why we make mistakes. He said, it said many times to me, do not depend on me for an answer. Interesting. So Kennedy is telling people to depend on it. What the hell? It's not correct. Well, he's also undermining me. It's an interesting thing. I appreciate that a lot of people are concerned about different information they get, but one of the things that's true in America, right, is that you pick who you want to have as your physician. And if you don't trust that person, you get a new doctor, which we always say, like if they're not someone you trust. But you then can choose someone and the relationship there between a patient and a physician, a provider that they trust, there's a lot of confidence there because we have selected and we've judged and we

7:27can change our mind. We're not assigned to a doctor. So yeah, this whole idea of trying to undermine the trust between a doctor and their patient. I mean, he's in this different lawyer world. I mean, those patients out there, they have cancer. And they can ask AI, what's the best approach? I mean, those people that have had strokes and heart attacks, which people with severe infections, they're going to ask AI, what is the best antibiotic? You know, I just as a really simple example, my daughter, Daisy and I were, we asked Groc, you know, that's the Tesla AI, the, I guess, Elon Musk AI. Hey, what's, what's cheaper? Marine diesel or diesel that you buy at the gas station? Oh, no, Marine diesel is cheaper. Daisy chimes up. That's not true. And immediately, you are correct. And I'm like, you know, it's like over eight bucks a gallon for the Marine diesel. And I'm seeing, you know, 649 at this, you know, side right in front of me here. Yeah. So, all right.

8:27W H O global cholera deaths rise by 30% in 2025. I, you know, part of the importance of this is that we've basically said, like all these things that are happening have consequences. People are going to die. And yes, we'll get to measles, but worldwide here, deaths from cholera rose by 30% in 2025. 7,870 people died from cholera, cholera. Oh my gosh. And these are, this is the highest number since 1999 since last century. Daniel, what is the reason for this? Is it increased poverty in these countries? I can't take care of so many people getting sick. So there's a large number of things that go into these issues. One is that we have really pulled back all our aid to a lot of these places. So most of this is in seven particular countries, you know, in Gola, Bangladesh, the D.R.C., Nigeria, South Sudan, Sudan, and Yemen. And these are areas not only have we pulled back the health

9:33assistance we provided, but there also was a lot of unrest in these areas. I mean, Yemen, a bit of a disaster at the moment, DRC. But now back to problems in our own backyard, the alert E. coli outbreak linked to raw milk cheese. Oh my gosh. Have we talked about like how dangerous it is to yes, many times? So this was actually posted by the CDC. And so the CDC and the FDA and public health officials in several states are investigating a multistate outbreak of E. coli infections linked to graze ears, raw milk, cheeses sold by Sierra Nevada cheese company. Over half of the sick people in the South break are children, five years old and younger. I want to point out not only have a number of patients been hospitalized, but there's been a number of cases of this hemolytic uremic syndrome where these little kids end up basically in kidney

10:34failure with the destruction of their red blood cells. This is really, you know, HUS is one of the more severe outcomes of the E. coli infections. Why would any company want to sell this kind of milk and risk having people get very sick when they get sued as a consequence? Or as a saying the package, you have no legal recourse if you die? It's really an interesting issue. Yeah, like, is it really profitable to go ahead and sell something where we're seeing here people are in the hospital, people are ending up getting renal failure? You kind of think like the repercussions that you sold a product that resulted in that being something that wouldn't work. Yeah. All right, DANGY, right? I was talking to the urgent care docs yesterday saying, now when you do your travel medicine, you're going to have to say, oh, Florida, that's basically the light traveling to the tropics. It is. So we read in the Washington Post, Florida counties declare emergency over wildly unusual DANGY outbreak. Mosquito-born disease has infected hundreds statewide

11:41and killed one woman in Tampa. You think this would be all over the news, but three Florida counties have declared states emergency as a growing outbreak of DANGY has infected hundreds across the state. Florida has reported 392 DANGY cases among residents this year. And actually, I went to the CDC page and I just, I mean, I can't believe it's this bad, but according to the CDC and you can, you can, you can say, well, how many of these DANGY cases are locally acquired? So I want the travel status to be locally acquired, 1,524 cases, only 484 cases from international travel. So we've got over 2000 cases so far this year in the US and the majority of those are just people living in the US getting bit by mosquitoes here. This is mostly in Florida, right? Yeah. Yeah. And I assume nobody in the US gets a DANGY vaccine, right? Well, there are no licensed DANGY vaccines available in the US right now. Okay. So DANGY

12:46Vax is kind of gone. Q DANGY is the one that worldwide, you know, is being used in certain areas. But yeah, in the US, we have no licensed available DANGY vaccine. Well, why do you think this is increasing? Do you think it's mosquito ranges is increasing? I think part of it is, dare I say climate change, I won't say anthropomorphic climate change, I'm saying climate change, the climate is changing, global warming. I think it's, isn't anthropomorphic? That's what gets people upset when you blame us for it, even though it is our fault. It's our fault, the help of you, you know, come on. Get real. It's anthropomorphic climate change, it's real. It's not fake. As the science advisor to the president recently said, it's fake, it's just not fake at all. The numbers are real. If you can't read charts, it's your problem. Yeah, the world's getting warmer, the storms are getting worse. The range of a lot of these, these arthropods, these mosquitoes is changing. Yeah. The thing about DANGY in Florida now, you get to a certain point,

13:49you have a lot of people who are infected. That's an opportunity for mosquitoes to pick up virus and transmit it. So the more people infected, the more cases you're going to get. It looks like we've reached this peak now, where it's always warm in Florida, so the mosquitoes are always biting. And this is a real problem. Now you're going to have exported cases to other states as people go there. And that is a big issue, right? As sort of joking about the travel medicine visit, but now people go and they spend some time down in Florida, right? And the doctor says, well, what do we tell them to do? I'm like, what are you going to tell them? Oh, you need to start wearing like long pants and long shirts and sprays. I'm like, they're going to Florida. People look at a Florida to wear long sleeve shirts and long pants and tuck them into their socks. And they go there to like wear shorts and t-shirts and they get bitten by mosquitoes and now it's become unsafe. I mean, Florida needs to think about this because tourism is a big part of their economy, right? And if people stop going to Florida, I wouldn't go to, well, I never would go anyway

14:49since they have a crazy governor and a crazy surgeon general. But now with this on top of it, forget it. Yeah, it's not like you can wear a mask, you know? Yeah, yeah. And you have a big, big target there on your head, Daniel. You can't go there. Yeah, it's true. All right. So the article, critical role of hepatitis B, birth dose vaccination, preventing mother to child transmission was published in CID by Anna Locke from the Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology University of Michigan and Arbor. You know, and because we have a lot of people who seem to not appreciate the importance of this, she walks through the issues. I'm going to share a link to this. This is a good, this is a good, well-written, accessible article. Read a little bit of it, preventing mother to child transmission. It's got a four-letter acronym, MTCT, mother to child transmission. Is the cornerstone of global elimination of hepatitis B virus infection? And here kind of the issue is because the risk of progressing from acute chronic infection is

15:5390% when infection occurs in newborns. We also need to really protect kids under five. Their risk is 30 to 50% for these children, one to five. Now, the effective prevention of mother to child transmission involves a multi-step approach, which goes through these one screening of pregnant women for hepatitis B surface antigen to initiating anti-viral prophylaxis. That's an off of here in the hepatitis B surface antigen positive pregnant women with high vibremia is cut off DNA greater than 200,000 international units per ml at 28 to 32-weeks suggestion. Number three, birth dose hepatitis B virus vaccine and hepatitis B immune globulant to newborns within 24 hours of birth and completing three dose HBV vaccine series as part of the expanded program for immunization

16:55starting at week six. And in the same edition of CID, we have the article Effectiveness of Timely Hepatitis B, birth dose vaccination to prevent mother to child transmission in Ethiopia. In this study, just like so many other shows that the vaccination series starting at six weeks is insufficient to prevent the mother to child transmission. I suppose I didn't mention the risk of contacting someone in the first few weeks of life that has had to be shedding here in the US. Yeah, I mean, we tried, we tried doing away or we tried a program where we didn't have birth dose and we saw little kids developing lifelong chronic hepatitis B virus infections. This whole idea that there's like these undesirable people and only though people need that, not us, not us good clean living people. Not true. It's just it's a fallacy and it's a fallacy that's going to lead to children dying, so which we will get to. All right, this next one's

17:58interesting and it's, you know, what is it doing in this section? And this is sort of as we're learning more and more about what causes autism, not vaccines, congenital torch infections and neurodevelopmental outcomes, a cohort study with sibling comparisons was conducted using linked data from the Swedish National Health, Earth, Insurance, Education and Death Registers. This is JAMA Network Open. So here they're looking at three million, 606,000 and two individuals born in Sweden between 1987 and 2021, including 975 who had torch infections. So maybe our pediatricians can rattle these off, but what are the torch infections? Like, you know, asking rounds at torture people. So T, toxoplasmosis, syphilis, rubella, cytomegalovirus, herpes, symplex virus. Wait,

18:59that doesn't spell torch. Don't worry. It's okay. So among these individuals born in Sweden, they're going to look at folks with and without torch infections, congenital torch infections, we're associated with increased risk of intellectual disability, not minor hazard ratio of 7.22, autism hazard ratio of 3.10, 95% confidence intervals for the autism 2.55 to 3.10. 7.6. They go through a lot of other analyses, but really pretty compelling data. But Sid rap has some comments. So implications for the US, given that Sweden's demographics and newborn screening policies can differ widely from other countries. Similar studies are needed to determine if the results are translatable. You hear this from Lisa Krohn, PhD, and epidemiologist specializing autism and other neurodevelopmental disorders at Kaiser Permanente's division of research.

20:01Krohn likewise was not involved in the study. The population impact of torch infections may be even greater in the United States. Passion said, noting that CMV epidemiology in the states differs from Scandinavia because of variation in public health practices. In general, Schlyce said, awareness of CMV is disturbingly low, which is why he wants Congress to pass the Stop CMV Act of 2025. Basically, this would involve a screen for congenital CMV infection in all newborns and should be the national standard of care. So Daniel, CMV can cause congenital birth defects, right? Yeah. But for the children who are not born with congenital defects yet or infected with CMV, is that a problem or is that why you would want to do the screening because then you would treat them with an antiviral or what? I think the concern here, as we're seeing, is that so among the torch infections are CMV. So if you're born with CMV and it's not recognized, it's not treated,

21:08this may be what leads to intellectual disability, what leads to autism diagnosis down the road. Because I was at ESCV a couple of weeks ago, there was a talk about congenital CMV screening and they actually, as many countries in Europe screen in the first trimester because that's when infection is the worst, right? Yeah. And then they will treat with Val cycle of ear eight grams a day. Long term effects not known. It's a lot of drug. Yeah, that is a lot of drug. Yeah. So I'm just curious. So what happens in the US right now if you were, are the mothers tested, first of all, for CMV doing pregnancy? Yeah. So if I don't think it's, well, so as we find from this bill, so who states so Minnesota and Connecticut currently screen for congenital CMV infection in all newborns? Yeah. But what about, yeah, what about pregnant ladies do all pregnant ladies get screened? No, not all pregnant ladies are getting screened. And as you point out, you know,

22:11first trimester, right? So that's like a lot of people, are you getting in early enough? Are you getting in getting screened? And then if so, is there any kind of, you know, treatment that's going on? Well, that's the thing. You can get screened. But if, yeah, you know, this seven grams a day is not really known if it's problematic or not, then what do you have? Yeah. No. And that would be, you know, these are all important questions that write, oh my gosh, you'd have to spend money to know the answer, not taking a seven year holiday from doing the research on infectious disease. So, you know, these are all like, and if we're really concerned about kids having intellectual disability and autism, then yeah, we need to know the answer. Is that safe? Is that effective? What are the risks that were, you know, yeah? All right. USEU object to UN declaration on future pandemics. Imagine that. Objections by the United States and a few other states appear to block a consensus agreement on the draft text at Friday's high profile UN high level meeting on pandemics,

23:14pushing the issue back to the general assembly where it could go to a vote before the close of the assembly's annual session in December. So we read here, the United States is not in a position to support this text in full, said the US representative of the debate, critical issues remain unresolved, whether it is the inclusion of divisive ideologies that lack definition, definitional consensus or references to an unfinished negotiation on pathogen access and benefit sharing is an agreement that failed to achieve international consensus. The US is not in a position to support this text. The European Union says it remains fully committed to the Decorations overarching objective, but it had reservations saying the text fall short of our goals and set out explicit red lines. Any comments on this, Vincent? Well, I don't know what the issues are here, but it seems to me, it sounds to me that this UN representative just doesn't want to sign anything about pandemic

24:20preparedness. So what's the problem with it? She said, I mean, she says it does not have a definitional consensus, which is the most ridiculous bureaucratic speak I've ever heard in my life. You mean you now agree on the definitions? Is that the problem there? But you know, Trump throughout Obama's pandemic preparedness document, and then he paid for it. And so I don't think the US is very fond of this because of him. And so that's what's reflected here in my opinion. Yeah, I mean, there was certain stuff in here that was just interesting. I got, you know, people's hackles up. They talk about infodemic management, misinformation and disinformation, and saying, well, we don't really have an agreed definition. I don't want misinformation. Okay. All right. Okay. Legionella, we have another outbreak, right? We've been starting to discuss this. 23 people have currently tested positive for Legionnaires. Disease most of folks have actually ended up in the hospital. Most of them have been discharged at this point, but we have a couple deaths. So this is the South Bronx, right? Yeah, this one is in the South

25:26Bronx, which is actually last summer. We had one in the South Bronx. That's often a problem area. But it's that time of year, right? It's in hopefully we're at the end of our Legionella season, right? Because people in the next few weeks will be turning off those air conditioners, we'll be shutting down all these. All right. You know, so. All right. Another case of screwworm. So we're up to 51. So that is now just marching along. But what's really marching along is Ebola, right? So we're still seeing that trajectory. We are now up to 8,116 confirmed cases, 3924 confirmed deaths of about a 50% mortality. And you can basically see, I mean, it's all on this eastern border. It's right at the edge of South Sudan. It's right on the edge of Uganda. It's actually right pretty close to to Rwanda and Burundi. So a lot of concerns that we have that it's going to be moving into these other countries. So

26:31I feel good that Rwanda will be able to keep this at bay. We saw some some good performance in Uganda in the past. South Sudan has a lot of people concerned. All right. Measles. Another person died. Five Measles related deaths. You know, the CDC has now acknowledged two of the Measles related deaths. So the little asterisk, you know, the two on the CDC sites as this number is subject to change, CDC will updates reporting as additional information becomes available and relative views are completed. But the Pennsylvania Department of Health has confirmed a fifth Measles associated death. We don't know much about this fifth person yet. But when we look at Measles, we're up to 3,782 cases in the US were up to 943 confirmed cases in Pennsylvania. And the outbreak in Pennsylvania,

27:34right? So more than 900 Measles cases. This is the largest and fastest-growing outbreak in the nation with 176 patients hospitalized for their infections. And now up to five deaths. Four has now become five deaths. And there's 114 new cases in just the last seven days. Most 118 years old, right? Yes. Many, not most many. Yes, so many. About a third are under 18 years old. You know, a lot of people are getting hospitalized. So, you know, this is close to 20% of the cases end up, it's 19% end up in the hospitals. These people are sick. And it's clearly a disease of the unvaccinated, less than 1% are fully vaccinated. Yeah, well, now that we're moving into the cooler months, do you think it's going to make an impact on the outbreak then? Part of the concerns we have are the school, right? All the kids, you know, getting together. Yeah. And we have numbers, right? We have pretty high numbers at this point. We're also, I think part of the issue

28:41is Pennsylvania right next to Jersey, New Jersey, and Delaware, which are low vaccines, so under the 95% in that sort of 90 to 95%. Also, on the, you know, this is a lot of this is Eastern Pennsylvania, but, you know, you go western Pennsylvania. And we've got good old Ohio, right? Which is, you know, less than 90% vaccine rates. This is a clear path westward for the virus. Yeah. New York, we're up to up to 85 cases. Is that 85 cases? Put on the glasses to say, yes, 85 cases in New York, and it's spotty. You can see sort of where it is. We had another case in New York City, so up to seven cases in New York City. How did we even talk to about Canada while? I'm going to go do a talk in DC with that Canadian, hopefully they'll let him in and out of the country. I told him bring his own maple syrup and whiskey. Otherwise, I'll have to drink the

29:43Irish stuff and maple syrup from Vermont. A total of 5462 measles cases, as of May. Well, so I think this is actually seems like it's pretty old, actually, the data here. So I have to update that. Let's take a look here. Let's take a look in real time. Let's see what the Canada data is in real time Vincent. Okay. Let's see what we 2025. Let's see. Okay. For 2026, you need to click somewhere else. Okay. Now we have 2026. What have we got? So we have 2026, 1,120 cases in Canada so far. All right. So not as that's actually not as bad, right? No, it's not as bad. Okay. All right. All right. Florida. Now this is concerning. So Florida, measles, measles disaster in Florida may not be far off. Analysis shows PNAS projected effects of removing school entry vaccination requirements and measles transmission in Florida. So this is an article in PNAS. And we've heard about Florida's

30:49proposal to remove school vaccine mandates. And we read it arrives at a moment when measles vaccination coverage in the state has fallen below the level needed to prevent sustained outbreaks. I'll mention it's already below 90% if you look at CDC data. So here using a mathematical model, these researchers show that repealing the mandate could trigger the largest measles epidemic in the United States in nearly half a century with projected pediatric deaths numbering in the hundreds within five years. They report that children are disproportionately responsible for driving transmission, adult catch up vaccination and non-pharmaceutical interventions such as masking and isolation and help, but they can't compensate for steep declines in vaccination coverage. And this study, these findings provide quantitative evidence that repealing school vaccine mandates risks making measles in Deemican, Florida and potentially re-igniting transmission across the US. So Florida, we got Dengie, now we got a sector of measles. Wonderful. Yeah.

31:59All right. So still minimal flu activity. We're just starting to see a little bit, you know, in a few places, but still plenty of time go out there, get your flu shot and we'll keep you updated as we start to see issues there. Are you looking at for flu this map of the US, the green, all the green? Yeah. So the CDC has a surveillance map where they basically, and people might remember this from the past, where it starts off with green with minimal activity and then we go into the low and moderate and we get to high as we get into our red, dark red. So I like the graphs where they show the number of diagnostic, diagnosed cases, but that's not not one of your links, right? Not yet. Not you know, flu view. That's what they used to call flu view. Yeah, where you can start. We'll start getting that once we see some rise in activity. Okay. Okay. Don't worry Vincent. I'm not worried. I'll keep bringing the data. All right,

33:00but COVID, what happened? So you have to be careful with these squiggly lines, you know, it looks like they're going down, but then they, because if you look at the past, they do go up and down and up and down and up and down. There's a lot of noise in them. So I think this peak still has some legs, frankly. Yeah, we're seeing actually a little bit in the hospital. I've got a few folks in the hospital at the moment. So we'll kind of see what's happening here, but yeah, I thought we were on our way down, but then we got a little bit of an up and we'll kind of see over time what happens. Wait, do you see one of the letters? Oh my gosh. Yeah. So no, COVID is not a thing anymore. It's not a thing. We don't have to pay attention. It's all over. Why do people? Why do you keep talking about it? But, you know, here's a great time for you to go out there and get your your COVID vaccination, right? So there was a, an article, Kathy Spendler sent me this article. It was the, the pink, the peekaboo trial, the ICO B O O, the peekaboo trial. So the

34:02platform trial in COVID-19 priming and boosting. I don't know, it's like we should wait for for Halloween for this, but the reactor genicity of nine licensed COVID-19 vaccines delivered in immunocompetent adults, right? So this is a thing we've talked quite a bit about. You know, people sometimes complain and sometimes it's a barrier to people even getting a flu shot or getting a COVID shot. They're worried about like, I'm going to feel bad after I get this shot, right? So that was a big issue with the mRNA shots, right? You get an mRNA shot. You're kind of down for a day. So here they do this trial. It's a randomized, Bayesian adaptive trial evaluating immunogenicity and reactogenicity of licensed COVID-19 vaccines in immunocompetent individuals, age 12 years, and over total of 1,049 COVID-19 vaccine doses were administered to 586 adults enroll between March 2022, September 2024. So local reactogenicity ranged from night 47%

35:08I'm going to give these common names so that Novavax, Novaxavid to 90% with Moderna. And then what about systemic reactogenicity? 69% with the Novaxavoid, Novavax, to 85% with the Pfizer shots, the Pfizer BioNTech shots. Severe reactogenicity events were rare, reactogenicity events as we see were common but rarely severe. And it looks like a little bit less with that Novavax shot as we've talked about compared to the mRNA vaccines. Yeah, but half as many reactogenicities, right? Yeah. A lot of people were talking about that in the livestream last night. Someone said that they were knocked out each time they get a mRNA, they're knocked out for four to five days. So I said, well, try Novavax, right? Yeah, go ahead and we've got alternatives. And if you have concerns, some people are super excited about

36:09an mRNA shot, some people would rather not, you got options. All right. I like it a lot. I don't have any reactogenicity. Which one do you get? Do you just get whatever they give you and you're fine? Yeah, I don't even know what I got last time. You know, how do they decide whether to give you the one of the two Moderna's or the Pfizer? What they haven't stocked for? You can you could sign up, like I think I was telling the story where my wife was finding out in the day that they got the new Vaxivid at the local stop and shop. She's like, it arrived and we go there like, oh, we don't have to yet. She's like, oh, you do. It just arrived today. The woman went back. She's like, oh, right. Let me take it out of the, you know, so well, the spike vaccine is only 65 and up. Right. You have to have an underlying condition. Yeah, there's, there's rules. There's rules. So, so I did get it. I have to check what I got. I'll let you know next time. Sounds good. All right. So before emails, no one is safe until everyone is safe. We're in the middle of our American Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene fundraiser. So go to parasites.com, click on the donate button.

37:14Thanks for all the folks that have have stepped up. I mean, this is this is your show. This is your medical education program. This is your ability to fight back up against the, the misinformation pandemic. So thank you for everybody doing that. It's time for your questions for Daniel. You can send yours to Daniel at microbe.tv. Josh writes, I'm writing about the anti-histamine nasal spray as, as Elastin, also known as astupro allergy. A while back five or six months, you Daniel had some positive, if preliminary words to say about this nasal spray noting that early trials seem to support the possibility of it significantly lowering the incidents among people who presumably had recently been exposed to SARS-CoV-2 of going on to develop an actual case of COVID. I haven't heard you mentioned since then, though I need to abashedly confess that I don't always rapidly listen to every second of every one of your podcasts. All right. That's it. We're not going to read the rest

38:16of it. Yeah. I'm so insulted. But what it's worth when earlier today, I asked a general purpose AI app about the possible use of this spray as a prophylactic for COVID-19. It appeared to have a generally positive opinion about it, citing a human study. I don't know the studies phase in which is Elastin apparently lowered the incidence of COVID in the study subjects by about 66 percent. I'd love to hear your thoughts and opinions on this topic. All right. Well, first off, Josh, I appreciate that even though you've already talked to AI, you're asking us to, right? You know, I think according to somebody you're supposed to do at the reverse way. You listen to what we have to say and if you don't agree, you go to AI to contradict. Yeah, it's it's then, right? We talked that one human study. It was interesting. We haven't heard anything since then, which is always a little concerning, right? Like if someone, you know, finds a thread and they pull on it, then you tend to hear if they're more, you know,

39:17consistent, supportive results. We haven't heard anything since that. So we're kind of just left with that. Jay writes, a letter from last week raised an interesting question. A listener asked about timing of SARS-CoV-2 vaccine following a recent infection. She had international travel coming up. So there was some urgency to getting vaccinated soon. The ASIP suggestion is to wait three months if possible after COVID infection before getting re-vaccinated. These recommendations came out in 2022. Does it still apply to our current world? Here are some of the questions it brings up for me. What is the immunologic rationale for waiting a minimal amount of time after infection before getting a vaccine against SARS-CoV-2? Is the rationale that time is needed for maturation of germinal centers? Are our germinal centers different now in 2026? And they were in 2020 and 2021 when the world was largely immunologically naive to SARS-CoV-2. What is the real world evidence that supports our recommendation? Does that evidence apply to us now and beyond? Or is it based

40:23on our 2021-22 world? I looked into this question a tiny bit barely scratching the surface. I ran across one interesting open access article from 2024. I'd like to hear your thoughts. Maybe a topic for a deep or dive. Okay. So this is great, Jay. So let's walk a little bit through this. In Jay Gladstone, Dr. Jay Gladstein, Chief Medical Officer out there in LA. So there's we'll start with the labeling, right? So when we moved from the prime boost scheduled series approach to COVID, vaccination to kind of the flu model, right? Is get a shot in most people in the fall, protection through the winter, get another shot the next fall. If you look like at the current packaging, it basically says like go ahead, get your one and done shot for this season, COVID, just like your flu. But if you've had a shot within the last two months, you're not eligible until

41:24those two months are gone by, then you can get your shot. Okay. So what's the story there? What? Why not just get a shot like a month after the last shot? What's a concern there? So part of the concern is increased reactogenicity, right? And so the idea is you've had a recent shot, you get another shot, maybe the local site reaction, which we just talked about in that study is going to be worse because you just had one. You just saw this vaccine before. The other and we'll get into kind of the immunology here is you've just had exposure. Yes. Two to three months. You've got the germinal center maturating and then you go ahead and you get a vaccine. And now you're actually going to not be interfering with the the germinal center. And you're going to get a diversification and you're going to get benefit from your vaccine. The other is kind of this discussion, which I think is sort of interesting, right? Think about stuff like this while I'm like laying on the couch, like I'm not napping, right? Resting my eyes and petting the dog and thinking like immune deep

42:28thoughts. But the other is, you know, you get this increase in antibodies and is that going to affect your ability to get the benefit that you're hoping to get from the from the vaccine. So is it is it maybe more than a germinal center interference? Is it also something about having, you know, antibody rise, you know, let's say three to four weeks? So there's a number of different sort of hand waving thoughts about why we recommend this. But yeah, that's the the packaging is saying, you know, don't don't get a COVID shot if you've had, you know, infection, I guess, or or a or a other vaccination in the last two months. And our thinking based upon our understanding and immunology is, you know, there's a certain amount of protection you're going to get from that recent infection. Go ahead, get a shot three months in. And we even talked about a study. I think it was last week where we looked about like, you know, getting one or two shots after you've had COVID infection. That was early days when we were doing prime boost approach. So the article that Jay

43:30sent was published in 2024. And it says that if you get if you get vaccinated less than six months after your last infection, you have it impacts your immunity to getting COVID. But that's a long time because then you have to balance the chance of being reinfected, right? Yeah, yeah. Yeah. Ellen writes just a note about a conversation I had recently, yesterday with my daughter who is a pharmacist. She has been working at flu and COVID vaccination clinics since the COVID vaccine first became available in late 2020. She worked clinics in long term care facilities and she continues to conduct clinics for institutions and businesses throughout the greater Boston area, including Sinofi headquarters. Yesterday, she was at a large workplace clinic where most people arriving asked only for flu shots. Eventually, she asked one woman, whether she had questions about the COVID vaccine, the woman replied that her doctor had advised her not to get it because COVID is now

44:32just the sniffles. Several employees waiting their turn then joined the conversation, saying that their doctors had also told them COVID vaccination was unnecessary. If you said they were simply done with COVID, my daughter told me it's increasingly clear to her that demand for COVID vaccination has declined each year. She remembers the clinics in late 2020 when she spent entire days in nursing homes wearing full PPE when she came home. She would address in the garage and shower before seeing her husband and children. She struggles to understand how quickly and profoundly our collective attitude toward COVID has changed. One word, RFK Jr. I'm sorry, that's my twiv clinical update. Watch your since March 2020. My husband retired pathologist MGH and I have never had COVID and still practiced the mitigation strategies learned on twiv with gratitude and respect to you in Vincent Ellen. Really? No, so thank you, Ellen. It's really tough, right? We keep talking, we keep

45:36sharing. I was saying last time that I had patient in the hospital and I can never even finish the sentence that, oh, so and so is admitted with COVID when someone was like, but it's mild, right? I'm like, she's in the hospital. She's in the hospital on oxygen. It's, I mean, if you consider sick enough to end up in the hospital, if the tens of thousands of people who die every winter had a mild death, the little kid that my daughter's taken care of who was went into DKA, it is in the ICU because they got a COVID infection. These are all vaccine preventable events. We could reduce the risk of these issues by what? You know, 50 to 80% pretty significant reductions with just getting a vaccination. So no, I think that, you know, we'll keep sharing the information, the numbers. You know, if it's a reactogenicity issue, you know, just switch to the protein base, new vaccivoid. If you tolerate the mRNA shots, then you can you can get those as well.

46:41You know, most insurances, there's, there's isn't even a copay. So this is like a free, this is a free way to reduce your risk. And we talk about it too. It's not just being sick with COVID, but you're going to, you know, increase your risk of new onset diabetes after the fact to get double your risk of getting diabetes because you didn't protect yourself. I got COVID. You're going to increase your risk of a heart attack or a stroke. You're going to increase your risk of ending up in the hospital. You're getting increased your risk of dying. And all these risks can be significantly reduced just by getting a vaccination. Keith writes, I was listening to the recent clinical update. I believe you both mentioned recently getting flu shots. I also listened to the Sidrap podcast. And Dr. Osterholm recommends getting COVID vaccines now, but waiting until influenza activity starts to ramp up in October, November to get your flu vaccine. He cites the waning effect of the current flu vaccines as his rationale. I would love to hear your thoughts on this also

47:44on several episodes of TWIV, especially 604, oral polio vaccine to prevent SARS-CoV-2 infection. I've listened to, I heard discussions about how viral vaccines might give your immune system a boost. Haterologist immunity, non-specific vaccine effects. I know the evidence for this is shaky and mostly for a live attenuated vaccine, but could spacing the flu and COVID vaccines out give your immune system a leg up? Yeah, so Keith, these are great questions, right? So the timing of our vaccines, right? So we're sort of doing a timing of our vaccines based upon like flu for it since that it's going to be a seasonal thing. We're usually going to see rises in November and December. Sometimes that actually doesn't happen until like sort of the spring break March surge. And by then you're like, oh, I got my shot, you know, in the end of end of August, beginning of September, like September, October, November, December, January, February, March, like, you know, we do see this 10% decline in protection over time. So, you know, it's like trying to time the

48:48market, right? I mean, it's hard to do. We're expecting. We're hearing predictions of an early flu season. If that pads out and getting flu shots now, if not, then you sort of have to ask the question like if it's you're starting to get a surge in March, you get your flu shot in September, you know, maybe you got it a little bit early. So what he points out about the attenuated vaccines, remember they're doing early COVID before vaccines, people were touting, you know, get MMR or polio vaccines, the infectious versions, and they give you a little boost for a couple of months. And this has been shown in studies carried out in the Soviet Union many years ago. But it's just these vaccines are not infectious to glue the COVID vaccines I'm talking about. So it's not an issue. Yeah, I mean, it's interesting, right? Like what's what's the best vaccine to prevent COVID? It's a COVID vaccine. It's the one you get. It's actually, yes. The other I think interesting, I remember the early days of, you know, the early days of COVID, right? It's like March 2020.

49:53It was one of the chief of medicine. He was like, Oh, can we do this test? We do this test. I was like, you know, what the best test is, you know, whether or not a person has COVID to get the COVID test. But yeah. All right. And Amy writes, I am typically aimed to get COVID vaccinated in mid November. My family's upcoming full break travel plans in mid-October to Florida's Disney World. I'm wondering if my family should try to get our COVID vaccines in late September to provide protection to my husband with comorbidities, my children five and eight and myself an outpatient internal medicine physician. I'm proud to say that both my children participated in the Pfizer vaccine trial. When conducted in our hometown of Nashville, we were all vaccinated last year against COVID in mid-November, given Christmas travel and time spent with elderly loved ones. I really appreciate the podcast and have listened for several years now. It's a great source of support and information as I try to figure out what's best for my family and my patients. I do also have a supportive pediatrician. And of course, I will ask his opinion. I was thinking about skipping the

50:56COVID shot for my kids this year, but a recent horrible case of adenovirus at back to school time, no COVID diagnosed at this point requiring ER visit with IV fluids, along with our travel plans to Florida has me thinking I will get my children COVID vaccinating to risk to lower any risk of another ER visit. I don't think we will take the flu shots until we get back from the full break. Of course, I will keep an eye on the CDC flu maps, which I hope are still decently reliable. Thoughts on that. Yeah, so Amy, this this is great. So just sort of walk through this for everyone what we're thinking. I mean, part of part of what you're thinking is you want to get the protection before your at risk of exposure. So if you've got upcoming fall break travel plans mid-October, if you're going to go to Disney World, we've already talked about the how frightening Florida can be this time of, but anyway, yeah, you can start thinking about what's the flu activity, what's the COVID activity and kind of timing that because as we talked about, you get the most protection. We'll

52:01say three to four weeks after the shot. We've talked about the numbers that we see with flu, where you get decreased. But the protection against severe disease, that has a decent durability. So and sorry that you had this sort of painful wake up call, but kids can get sick. I mean, that's why we have children's hospitals. Kids can get really sick from viral infections. They can end up in the hospital. What is it? A quarter of the kids with COVID that end up in the hospital, end up in an ICU. They need IV fluids. They need oxygen support. So yeah, I, you know, on board, it sounds like you are going to do both the flu and the COVID shot and sort of keeping, maybe try to keep track of those flu maps. But yeah, by mid-October, which is coming right up, we may be starting to see flu activity down there in crowded Florida's Disney World. And remember, leave your shorts and short-sleeved shirts at home. Bring long-sleeved pants and shirts. Got to worry about Dany now.

53:07That's Twiv, weekly clinical update with Dr. Daniel Griffin. Thank you, Daniel. Oh, thank you. And everyone be safe.