
Get every episode summarized
Each time BBC Inside Science publishes, we email you a written briefing from the transcript — the topics, who appeared, and any specific claims, with the ad reads skipped.
Email me new episodesFree for 3 shows. No card needed.
About this episode
Full briefing“This BBC podcast is supported by ads outside the UK. Heat waves, data leaks, AI hacks, holding phones, and a viral spinally challenge record. I'm Just Maddix and the Interface is back from its summer break.”From the transcript
Today’s show summary
The focus was on the future of particle physics, particularly at CERN, the European Organization for Nuclear Research. The discussion began with an exploration of the upgrades being made to CERN's Large Hadron Collider (LHC). Paul Fessia, the deputy project leader of the I luminosity LHC, explained the purpose of these upgrades, which aim to increase the number of particle collisions to study rare events and push the boundaries of the current standard model of particle physics. The enhancements include more powerful superconducting magnets and changes in the beam shape to increase collision probabilities. The episode also delved into the Cloud experiment at CERN, where researchers study aerosol particles and their role in cloud formation. Eva Sommer, a PhD student and cloud run coordinator, described how the experiment isolates specific molecules to better understand the microphysical processes involved in cloud formation. This research is crucial for improving climate predictions, as clouds play a significant role in the Earth's climate system by reflecting sunlight and influencing temperature. Additionally, the future circular collider project was discussed. This proposed collider, which would be significantly larger than the LHC, aims to make precise measurements of subatomic particles, particularly the Higgs boson. The project, though costly, is seen as a valuable investment for the global physics community due to its potential to provide significant insights into fundamental physics. Finally, the episode touched on the Open Skylet project, where plant biologist Cristiana Staudinger explores using excavation materials from CERN's tunnels to create engineered soils. This initiative addresses the global issue of soil degradation and aims to develop sustainable soil solutions from what would otherwise be considered waste.
Tom Whipple travels 100m below Switzerland to the tunnels of CERN's Large Hadron Collider (LHC) where the beams have been powered down to begin the High-Luminosity LHC upgrade. Paulo Fessia, deputy head of the upgrade project, shows us what they're doing and why.
In one of the cavernous halls on the site, Antti Onnela explains what the machinery is used for when it's not smashing particles together; understanding the formation of clouds. With Eva Sommer, Run Coordinator of the project, we learn how clouds are born from aerosol particles in a specialised chamber and how this informs climate models.
We also learn about what many hope is the next phase of European particle physics, the future circular collider (FCC). The FCC is due to be 3.4 times larger than the LHC and cost around £14 billion. Guy Wilkinson tells us why he believes the cost is justified.
And what will they do with all the substrate that is cleared for the new tunnels? Tom visits plant scientist Christiana Staudinger at the OpenSkyLab project in the fields above CERN's tunnels where they are making soil in hopes of replenishing the world's dwindling sources.
Presenter: Tom Whipple Producers: Ella Hubber, Katie Tomsett and Ed Prendeville Editor: Ilan Goodman Production Co-ordinator: Jana Bennett-Holesworth
Get every episode summarized
Each time BBC Inside Science publishes, we email you a written briefing from the transcript — the topics, who appeared, and any specific claims, with the ad reads skipped.
Email me new episodesFree for 3 shows. No card needed.
Hosts & guests
Transcript ready
324 searchable segments. Every word is indexed and playable.
Full transcript
BBC Inside Science — The future of particle physics. Machine-transcribed; use the interactive transcript above to jump the player to any line.
This BBC podcast is supported by ads outside the UK. So, quick summer recap. Heat waves, data leaks, AI hacks, holding phones, and a viral spinally challenge record. Yeah, I think that covers it, right? I'm Thomas Germain. I'm Just Maddix and the Interface is back from its summer break. New season, new co-host, same deep dives into the tech that's shaping our world and our lives. So before AI wipes out all of humanity? Allegedly. Join us for the Interface. Listen on BBC.com or wherever you get your podcast. Hello and welcome to Inside Science and this week we are on location. That location, we are 100 meters below a French McDonald's. More specifically, we are in one of the massive cathedral-like caverns that constitute a small part of CERN, the Particle Physics Laboratory.
The detector is off. They are upgrading CERN. They are looking to bash more particles together. More often to find out more things about the universe. But why and what do they hope to find out? We are here for a special episode to see exactly what's going on in CERN. We are here outside a really big warehouse that's got really big pipes and I can see a really big metal door. Everything is really big in CERN. You can hear that there's not a construction going on. That's because we are above the biggest upgrade. They've been up to in quite some time and I suspect we're about to go into what will also be a really big lift because we're going to go down there and we're going to see what they're doing. So we're in the lift and we're currently at ground level. This will take us not to the main tunnels at CERN,
but to the service tunnels to the high lumi upgrade. We have an altimeter minus 32 meters, minus 40 meters, taking us all the way down to minus 70 meters where we're going to meet the man who is overseeing this upgrade. My name is Paul Fessia. I am the deputy project leader of I aluminozity LHC. I am in charge of managing all the installation activities in the different work sites. Let's start with the basics. Somewhere over there, there's a really big tunnel. What happens in it? That tunnel asks the large adrum collider that is an accelerator of particles where we accelerate protons. In a true separate beam and inside the experiments, as we call them, we bring those beam together in order to collide.
This collision can create high energy particles. That's why we have this large detector that works like a photographic machine in order to take photos of the events. And through that, try to understand which type of particle we are looking at. And why do we want to look at interesting, high-energy particles? What's this telling us about the world? Because we are moving towards the limits of what is called the standard model. These large theory that try to put together all the different types of forces that are managing the interactions of the particles. And today, this standard model is perfect, but it doesn't explain all. So here we are pushing it towards the limit in order to try to complement it and make it evolve. So you found the expose on the particle that gives other particles mass.
And you found it here in 2012. And you've been busily happily smashing particles together all of that time. Why do you now need to stop the whole thing and give it an upgrade? Because today, we are going to study much rarer events. And in order to study these events, you have to collect more of them. So we will collide and we will create 10 times more events per unit of time. So basically, you want more of those protons to hit each other. Exactly. First of all, we are going to put more fuel in the machine, more protons. And the second thing, we are going to concentrate those protons in much smaller volume in such a way that the density when they cross each other is much higher. And then the probability that one guy meets the other guy is much higher. And in order to do that, we are going to install much more powerful, superconducting magnets that create much higher field. And this field will have exactly the same function that an optical lens of a telescope.
Instead of putting a collimating light, it will collimate particles in the center in as much smaller volume and therefore, increasing the probability that we add a collision. We are going to also change the shape of the beam. So today, the beam, they cross inside the experiments with an angle. And the beam is a kind of an ellipseoid. That means that the sections that superpose of one ellipseoid over the other is just as more fraction. These ellipse, we are going to take it and turn it in such a way that when they now will cross, they will cover completely one with the other. And these will allow us to use in much more efficient way the number of protons that we will have put in the machine. And that is the function of the crop cavity. Why they call crop cavities? Because your beam is going to be twisted and it will move like a crab that is walking on the sand,
walking not in the direction of the beam, but is walking transversally to the direction of the beam. So we are just now walking towards the top of the ellipseoid tunnel. The ellipseoid tunnel is 10 meters in front of us and 10 meters below us. So in a few seconds we will just be standing on the top of it. So the ellipseoid is just running below our feet. So these are the service tunnels and these are, I guess, about the size of a London underground tunnel. The moment you have a lot of cables, a lot of NDS, a lot of construction. And I saw a bicycle. Is that forgetting around? Yes, in the ellipseoid we move around a lot with bicycle because you have one axis of point, every 3.3 kilometers. So if the issue that you need to solve is in the center of the arc, you have about 1.7 kilometers to go and that is much better to go if you're back.
You must be fit. Of course. Okay, so once you've got your courage and it's installed, all of your electricity up here, the thing's running and you've got 10 times as many collisions per second as you normally do, what's the thing that would most excite you if they discovered it? Something that we don't expect. That will be the most exciting things, something that will open a new door. Also some of the technologies we are doing here, we are also moving towards, for example, energy recovery. The big superconducting magnets, by definition, they do not use energy. You inject current, but then you don't need to still pump current to make it work. So when we are going to decrease the field, we will have ear batteries that will recover the energy that gets out from the magnet and we will reuse the same energy after to reenergize, to repump up again the magnetic field. What is your electricity bill? We are about the consumption of a city of about 300,000 inhabitants.
Okay, so you're about an extra two thirds of Geneva. Okay, so my name is Antionnella, I'm a mechanical engineer at the Sun, and I'm the mechanical engineer in the cloud experiment. So the building is entered here. To this building, we're in this huge warehouse and this sits at the end of one of the early accelerators. Yes, yes. On the side. So it's part of the accelerator chain to get the protons to the LHC, the biggest accelerator in the world. In fact, it's accelerated by smaller accelerators. We start from first gear, second, third, fourth, etc. And this is about the third or fourth gear. When it's not accelerating protons for injection to the bigger accelerators, all the rest of the time it can be used for sending protons to target areas, which is this one over here. The protons are hitting a target upstream over here and then we get secondary particles over here. And those secondary particles are guided by magnets to these target areas where we
then have experimental devices, development of instrumentation. And then we have this own here, which is used by Cloud. How does one make Cloud? How does one even define a Cloud? Well, Clouds we are making with the reduction of pressure inside the aerosol chamber. We have to be able to make condensation on aerosol particles inside the chamber. So you've got a chamber full of little particles of what? What we are studying in Cloud, formation of aerosol particles in the atmosphere. There are two kinds of aerosols in the atmosphere, directly produced aerosols, which are coming from sand, dust, exhaust emissions from cars, industry, etc. And then aerosols which are indirectly produced, so they are first in gas phase, but which then are converted into particles in the atmosphere. And these mechanisms of how to get into these aerosols is the key thing that Cloud is studying. We're looking at some thing which
has got pictures of how these made and you've got a cow. How's the cow making aerosols? So the the cows are and agriculture in general, it is emitting ammonia, amines, which are then part of this aerosol formation processes in the atmosphere. So then you've got your aerosols in the chamber, how do you then make the clown from that? What's the next step? So most of the studies in fact, until now have been on the aerosol formation itself, not on the formation of the clouds. The aerosols are needed for forming cloud droplets. So they have a cloud condensation nuclei as they are called on which water molecules are going to condense to form droplets, ice particles in the atmosphere. So in a sense we are looking at the birth of clouds. This is all fascinating and you've got a very big chamber beyond us, all this happens. Why is this happening at CERN? Well the key reason
for being at CERN in the gas to particle conversion processes, electric charge is one of the key elements on the formation rates. And electric charge in the atmosphere is created from a few different origins. One of them is cosmic rays and cosmic rays ionizing molecules in the in the atmosphere. And to study how much this ionizing radiation will influence or not aerosol formation rates, the idea was that okay why not putting the aerosol chamber to a beam where we can modulate the cosmic ray quantities which otherwise we can't in fact they just come as they come. But here we can. So we have kind of similar particles as the cosmic rays are and we are able to modify the ionization rates. Effectively what we are doing with the particle beam is like elevating the chamber in the atmosphere to higher altitudes because the cosmic ray levels are higher altitudes is higher. And that's why so so listeners might think that this is
called cloud because you make clouds but it's called cloud because it's cosmic leaving out stored droplets. It's totally natural acronym you must have been so surprised when it turned out that's spelled out cloud. Yeah I think that must have been one of the most important things. How do you invent the acronym or that makes some sense? So you've got the clouds in the chamber, the describe the chamber to me. The chamber itself is inside that thermal housing so if you want we can go to the platform to see the state. So we have a 20 centimeter thick layer of insulation and then we have 15 centimeter thick layer of air which we circulate when we are running to control the temperature of the chamber and what you see there behind is the the wall of the chamber itself with a couple of ports for putting probes instruments inside the chamber. It's like a massive thermos it's just yes yes yes exactly and we are able to go to around minus 70 degrees
and so presumably you can't go in there and be rained on or experience your cloud or no absolutely not so we keep it closed all times we are always flashing it with a very clean air to keep the inside of the chamber as clean as we possibly can. So I am Eva Sommer I came to Surn as a PhD student and I also work as the cloud run coordinator. We are very different from most other experiments that Surn we are an environmental science experiment. Now I noticed on the way into and out of the cloud chamber that there were a lot of clouds above my head that didn't need a cloud chamber at Surn. Why are we studying these at all in a cloud chamber? Why don't you just look at the many clouds that are made in the atmosphere without all of this faff? Well because our atmosphere is extremely complicated we have millions and millions of different compounds in our real atmosphere all the time and the one thing that cloud can do we can isolate different molecules or different
chemical processes and really study only that one thing without being confused by the millions of other things that are going on. So the cloud experiment at Surn is the world's cleanest aerosol chamber which means that we can control all of the trace gases that we put inside our chamber and down to the part per trillion volume level. And why do we need study clouds? So in the end the overarching goal of the cloud experiment is to improve our uncertainties in climate predictions. We as human beings we warm our climate by emitting CO2 and other greenhouse gases but we also produce a certain amount of global cooling. Now clouds as we know they tend to be white right so clouds tend to have a cooling effect on our atmosphere and they do that because as we receive radiation from the sun and sunlight hits the planet if it hits a cloud or a white surface a large fraction of that is being reflected back into space. So overall if you have more clouds you have a cooler climate. So for us to actually understand climate change and to make reliable
predictions for how the climate will evolve in the future we need to understand how our clouds and the cloudiness of our atmosphere will behave in the future and has behaved in the past. So if we want to understand what our impact on the cloudiness of our planet is we need to understand all of the micro physical processes that are involved in making clouds and making aerosol particles so that we can feed this information into a climate model and then can make accurate predictions. Recently you've been looking at marine aerosols what are you injecting differently into your cloud chain when it's marine versus terrestrial. So at cloud we can simulate different environments and we distinguish them by of course by temperature by humidity but also mainly by the trace gases that we inject. In the marine atmosphere we have this compound called DMS or Dymethyl sulfide and this is emitted naturally by phytoplankton. The DMS in the real atmosphere is then oxidized and to form two compounds that are important for aerosol particle formation. One of them is sulfore gasset and the other one is called MSA. So we have simulated cold conditions from between minus
50 something I believe and like minus and plus 10 degrees and we've had these two compounds made from DMS in our chamber and what we found and what was not known before is that MSA very much like sulfore gasset is very active in participating in the formation of aerosol particles. So the big implication that this new publication of ours has is that we have identified a natural source. Carfomo hotline Hi I bought a car but I keep wondering if there's one that I would have liked even more. How many cars did you test drive? Just the one I bought. Yep that's carfomo. You'll have to go to Cerritos Auto Square for the cure. They're the only place in Socal with 24 dealerships all on the same block so you can compare your top options and know for sure which one is right for you. That's a different hotline. Cerritos Auto Square. Details at cerritosautosquare.com. So quick summer recap. Heat waves, data leaks, AI hacks, holding phones and a viral
spinally challenge track here. Yeah I think that covers it right. I'm Thomas Germain. I'm Jess Maddix and the Interfaces back from its summer break. New season, new co-host, same deep dives into the tech that's shaping our world and our lives. So before AI wipes out all of humanity. Allegedly. Join us for the Interfaces. Listen on BBC.com or wherever you get your podcast. Of aerosol particles which is not impacted by human activity as much. This is very important for actually estimating this offset that we are causing in addition to the global warming. Do you find it strange that something as basic as a cloud isn't completely understood? Well if I'm not giving an interview here I'm sitting here writing my thesis. So I want to say that a cloud is not a very basic thing. It's a very very complex mechanism to end up with a cloud in our atmosphere. It's actually fascinating that it works at all.
So we have come and grabbed ourselves a coffee. We're in the sun. Cafeteria I can see Mont Blanc in front of me and I have a bunch of physicist mathematicians and engineers chattering away behind me. But in front of me I also have Guy Wilkinson and we're here to talk about the future. We're at a particle physics laboratory. We're above a really really big tunnel but there's a plant. It builds a really really really really really big tunnel. Tell us about the future circular collider. Yeah the future circular collider is a project that's been gestating for I think about 15 years now. So this would be a collider of circumference 91 kilometers to be contrasted with the LHC which is 27 kilometers. It would go under the lake but it would collide electrons and positrons. That's different from the LHC which collides protons and protons. Its purpose would be to make extremely precise measurements of many of the most important
subatomic particles we know of in particular the Higgs boson. This will for sure tell us an enormous amount what I don't know but it will be a very fascinating journey. It sounds like a huge project. Why does the tunnel need to be so big to achieve that? If you accelerate electrons or positrons they have the characteristic that they emit radiation as you try and turn them round a bend. This is useful for some applications but for particle physics colliders this is a bad thing because you're losing an energy. So in this accelerator we want to go to very high energies. We want to have many many collisions and so we want to minimize this loss of energy through what's called synchron radiation. One way you can do that is by making the the bend they go around as gentle as possible and that to motivate having a very big circumference tunnel. Why electrons and positrons? Why specifically this? Electrons and positrons when they collide the environment is incredibly clean. The advantage of protons and protons is you can go to very high energies
or without suffering this problem of synchron radiation I said earlier but environment is very messy. There are backgrounds so if you're wishing to study the Higgs boson for example you can only really spot the appearance of the Higgs boson and the collision if it does something very dramatic, very unusual. From this the LHC has made some very important measurements but if you want to characterise everything that the Higgs boson does you want an environment where you can see every Higgs boson that's produced this can only be done in an electron positron collider. And when would it be finished? We would hope for project approval in 2028 construction of the tunnel would begin in the early 2030s so we're talking about the mid 2040s. How much is this going to cost? It's been costed at approximately 15 billion Swiss francs. So that's about 14 billion pounds, 18 billion US dollars? It is a very large amount of money but let me try and put this in context so this is something that would be used by an extremely larger community of physicists. Moreover it is for
a project which would last and its first incarnation for 15 or 20 years and then there is the possibility to reuse the tunnel for a new accelerator which would run for another 30 years. So we do feel that this is a value for money investment one which really does justify the cost. It hasn't been met with universal claim in the physics community has it? There's been some physicists who are quite critical of the proposal and the scale and say that the money could be better spent on smaller projects and more smaller projects. If we speak about the particle physics community there has not been unanimity but that is never the case for any project but there has been an overwhelming consensus. There was a process which concluded early this year where we examined with great detail what would be the best new collider to build. There were various possibilities on the table. None of these offered the same physics reach, the same precision for the studies of the Higgs boson nor breadth of physics in other areas. So when it came to each country
casting its vote and each physicist expressing their opinion I would say that verdict was overwhelming to a surprising degree. One quote, so Helena Brahmovich from Tel Aviv University said the issue is whether the community is willing to sacrifice the next 50 years to get a toy which may or may not be the way for fixing the standard model. May or may not fix the standard model but everyone agrees it will tell us an enormous amount and the journey will be very worthwhile. We are 20 minutes outside of Geneva in the countryside. We are still above the Sun beam line which is why you might hear a bit of construction work in the background but we're also surrounded by plant life. There are olive trees, there are fruit trees, there are hedgerows and we're here with someone who can explain what's going on and why this is still very much to do with Sun. My name is Cristiana
Staudinger. I'm a plant biologist and I help Sun with working on the project Open Skylet. That's a project where we develop strategies for how we could use excavation materials to create engineered soils or planting substrates from them. Sun digs a lot of tunnels and is planning to dig a lot more tunnels and when you do that you've got a lot of stuff you need to use. Yes, when Sun constructs for example something as big as the future circular collider, most of the excavation materials that surface are sedimentary rocks that come from the erosion of the Alps and this rocks we call them moulas. Here we want to test whether these moulas materials contain minerals with a specific texture and with specific physical chemical properties that are really positive for constructing soils. Can you define for me what a soil is?
For me as a biologist the soil is a living system and it's the very first crust that we have on our terrestrial surfaces that allows for our knife to unfold. And as someone who has spent quite a large part of his life walking on things that I consider to be soil it's quite a surprise to me that we might not have enough of it but we don't. There is a shortage because we first of all we destroyed so much of it through the process of soil artificialisation and also soils grow so slowly. The global annual averages of about 10 micrometers per year. We risk running out of soils if we continue to destroy them. And so you think that this waste which would normally call waste that we're taking from the tunnels underneath the sun could actually have value and could be something that can be turned into a soil. Yeah those mineral waste they can be used to really specifically target soil
functions that we want to reach in some years from now. That could be something like the capacity to hold water, the capacity to filter water or the capacity to build biomass for example. And that's what we are doing here in the open sky. We installed our soils, we developed our soil formulations and from now we observe how those soil functions slowly start to emerge and how our soils start to be populated by microbes, plants, micro-atropods etc etc. Take me through the process of you take the waste from sun you take it from the tunnels and you bring it up here what happens next what do you do and what does nature do so that at the end of it you have a soil. We crush the molasses to have a particle size distribution from about 0 to 20 millimeters and then the molasses will be mixed with varying proportions of organic
amendments. In this case we used green waste compost, our plant species that we selected and our management practices. In some instance also our microbial amendments will do the rest. It's a show us what we've got. So here we're walking by a hetero. Yeah here we have a hetero. This hetero combines so-called ornamental species but they're also very useful for pollinators. We also introduced other species that enhance insect biodiversity and its surroundings. So that's the thought that we had behind the selection of those. And is everything growing as it should? Here it's growing really well. For all of our shrubs and trees that we planted we only have a mortality rate of 10 percent so that's still at the moment very positive. We will see what happens over the coming years. And so then you leave this out and slowly nature colonizes it and it becomes
what you need. And we observe it. So we have installed lots of soil sensors and we do regular soil sampling events. And we observe the slow colonization. We observe the slow emergence of the soil functions. And from this first year we can already say that the nutrient cycles are starting to be formed. And also we have some first soil structure formation which is very important because soils need a lot of porosity to be functional. And we also have quite satisfactory biomass production. We're back in Sun cafeteria. Mon Blanc is shining a little less bright and the physicists are now drinking beers not coffee. And below us the tunnels are preparing to smash even more protons even more often. The glorious thing is when they do we genuinely don't know what they will find out. That's it from Inside Science on tour at Sun. Cheers!
So quick summer recap. Heat waves, data leaks, AI hacks, holding phones and these virus finally challenge track here. Yeah I think that covers it right. I'm Thomas Germain. I'm Jess Maddix and the Interfaces back from its summer break. New season, new co-host, same deep dives into the tech that's shaping our world and our lives. So before AI wipes out all of humanity. Allegedly. Join us for the interface. Listen on BBC.com or wherever you get your
More episodes
