
Get every episode summarized
Each time The Todd Huff Show publishes, we email you a written briefing from the transcript — the topics, who appeared, and any specific claims, with the ad reads skipped.
Email me new episodesFree for 3 shows. No card needed.
About this episode
“America's Home for Conservative, not bitter talk and education. Be advised, the content of this program has been documented to prevent and even cure liberalism. And listening may cause you to lean to the right.”From the transcript
Get every episode summarized
Each time The Todd Huff Show publishes, we email you a written briefing from the transcript — the topics, who appeared, and any specific claims, with the ad reads skipped.
Email me new episodesFree for 3 shows. No card needed.
Hosts & guests
Transcript ready
617 searchable segments. Every word is indexed and playable.
Full transcript
The Todd Huff Show — The Attempted Hijacking of an Israel-Bound Flight. Machine-transcribed; use the interactive transcript above to jump the player to any line.
Attention, you're listening to the Todd Huff Show. America's Home for Conservative, not bitter talk and education. Be advised, the content of this program has been documented to prevent and even cure liberalism. And listening may cause you to lean to the right. And now, coming to you from the full suite Wealth Studios, here's your conservative, but not bitter host, Todd Huff. Folks, I don't know how we do it every day. I don't know how we talk about what's happening out there. I don't know how we stare this insanity in the face. This culture, this society has completely lost what is ever left of its collective mind. This culture has completely just lost it, my friends, in a lot of ways.
And we have better, we'd better do something about it quickly and immediately, my friends. It is unbelievable the degree to which things are unraveling out there. And I've got a couple of stories I want to get to today. First and foremost, there are some developments in the Lentley, Lindsey Clancy case. Her attorney was before the judge making arguments about how this case would proceed. As now they've, of course, had a hung jury with the first jury and now we're determining the next steps here. And it is wild, some of the things that are being said in that courtroom. It is wild, some of the things that have happened in that case. And it is wild watching grown women, grown women defend this. It is astonishing to me to listen to some of this, the inability for some people to accept basic truths, the inability of some people to understand what happened in that first trial.
And what was actually determined what, you know, how the good guy here, how the loan hold out juror is somehow the bad guy. He's in the crosshairs of this defense attorney facing calls, facing actions, potential actions demands from the defense attorney that are unheard of in our system of justice. The entire, our entire culture civilization, my friends, is hanging by the balance because these folks, these folks that have been given a, in some cases, a platform. In some cases have gotten political power or just gotten the attention of other people. They have, it's devoid of all logic and common sense and rationale. You know, the Bible has a term for this and this, we're dealing with reprobates. I truly hate to say that. We are dealing with reprobates. A reprobate is someone, someone who has refused to accept basic truths, truths that are evident
for all people to see. In fact, if you read the book of Romans chapter one, you'll see that God has revealed to all people through his creation, evidence of his existence. It's undeniable evidence, really. And it's not to say that people who have questions about these things and uncertainties can't have them. That's not the point that people look at this world as created. We live in this universe that's based upon, predicated upon, cause and effect. And they'll go back and they'll say the first effect, the first effect that we had, the creation of this universe had no cause because they know, and this is what it boils down to, they know that if the universe had a cause, that cause had to be something divine. And they know that if there's something divine, that they are held to account to that divine being. And they don't want that. They don't want that. That requires that they accept that there are things that are right and wrong.
There's a moral law that requires that they acknowledge that they are not God. And this is, this is again, humanity's problem. This is a universal problem. This is why why we turned our backs on our creator. Same reason Lucifer did wanted to be gods of our own life. We wanted to determine what was right or wrong, good for ourselves, what was acceptable. We wanted to call the shots, the great sin of pride. And it is all over the place, my friends. And it is causing our suicide, great impact to our society. You know, it's interesting. We would say, I'll think a lot of people would say that certain things that other people decide for themselves, the way that they want to live their lives, don't affect the rest of us. But that's not entirely true. If you have people who are living as reprobates and who are destroying the fabric of civilization, law and order, all things good and decent, that absolutely affects the world that the
rest of us live in. And I'm not here to say that these folks have to be defeated politically. I'm not here to say that they should be censored. That's not what I'm here to say at all. What I'm here to say is that the stakes are high. stakes are very high. And we had better start doing something about it. If we think that we're going to win this cold civil war, this spiritual war, which is what it is at its core, the spiritual war, if we think we're going to come out on as victors here by doing the things we've been doing, the way that we've been doing them, we're fooling ourselves. We've got to ratchet this game up. We've got to make sure that we're out there speaking, articulating truth. And we've got to be willing and able to stand right in the face of this stuff. This stuff is unbelievable. What's happened in particular with this case with Lindsey Clancy, where we have a whole group of women who excuse her killing three children, her three young little defenseless innocent children. If you're defending the killing of children, and I extend this to abortion as well, if
you're killing because they are children, by the way. But if you're killing children, if your society excuses this, man, woe to that society. That is, I don't know what's worse than that. I don't know if you're ranking the evils and atrocities of humanity. I don't know what's worse than killing innocent children and then excusing it, my friends. We've got that. We've got that going on out there today. So I want to talk about that case and what's going on there. The holdout juror will talk about him will play his remarks that he hasn't made on video that are about a minute long. And then time permitting will get to this debacle of a league that's called the WMBA, which is an absolute and utter disaster in joke, which I know that you know that already. But it's, it seems as though they look at the things that they've done previously that are ridiculous and absurd.
And then they somehow up the ante here because last night Indiana fever played the Las Vegas aces, Aja Wilson had an altercation with the fan over nothing over nothing, my friends. If you've gone that again, if we find out through microphones that something else was said, okay, that would change things. But from what we can tell, nothing, nothing happened. This is unbelievable. And the people defending what she did, which was walk into now, this was people seated behind the basket at the fever game, walking into the crowd. Technically, she's standing in next to the first row, addressing a fan in the second row, very aggressively unnecessarily. This is unacceptable. This should not happen. She should be, she, they should, if a player does this, a player should not be going, that they should be suspended. This is, you can't have this sort of stuff that the thinness of the skin of these women
in the WMBA. And I don't throw them all in there, but there's a lot of them. I don't throw Caitlin Clark in there. I don't throw Sophie cutting him in there. I don't feel, throw the fever in there. I don't throw Alia Boston in there, Kelsey Mitchell. There's others look, but there are some prima donna attitudes here who think that they are God's gift to basketball and to sports fans around the country. And they believe that they can act however they want without consequence. This happens in the WMBA, excuse me, the NBA as well, but it is, it comes, it's just a little different. It's, I don't know, this is just a debacle. And so time permitting, I'll get to that too. It's a good chance. I won't have time. If we don't have time, I will write about it in the inner circle, which you can get for totally free at Toddhaveshow.com. You can sign up there. All right. That's where we're headed here, my friends. But before I do that, you know that there's a lot of confusion out there about freedom.
You've probably heard, read the headlines. And most of those headlines, the bad news about freedom are based on synthetic garbage and shady sellers that are selling things that isn't even real freedom. Real freedom is natural. It is tested. It is handled with care. It is not a synthetic. And my friends, this is what you get from Christopher's organic botanicals family run company. They partnered directly with farmers in Indonesia. Every batch is lab tested. There's no chemicals, no fillers, no shortcuts. This is a trusted herbal option that's been used for generations. It is a real alternative for people looking for something that doesn't come with a warning label that is a mile long. So do your research. Check it out. Go to the website. Learn more. If you decide that this is for you, start with their creative starter pack coupon code, hot huff saves you 10% off your first order.
Christopher's organic botanicals.com. That's the website. Christopher's organic botanicals.com truth, tradition, transparency. Okay, let's go through what's happening in this Lindsey Clancy case. It is remarkable. It's remarkable. Before I get into this specifically, I want to reference something that happened. Let's see. I would say a week, maybe two weeks ago, a week or two ago, the attorney for Lindsey Clancy, Kevin Reddington, he request an investigation into the whole that juror. So this is unprecedented. In fact, I'll play briefly for you. Briefly for you. A clip of an interview, I think I saved this anyway. Clip of an interview, Fox News had with the loan holdout juror, his attorney, because
again, what we had, let's set the stage here. We had a woman, Lindsey Clancy, who acknowledged in her in the courts arguments that she killed her three children, young children, strangled them taking four, I've heard even up to six minutes, strangling each child. It's just a, I shutter at this absolute evil, my friends, depravity, wickedness, just absolute evil. She strangles them with exercise bands and her entire defense, Magnum mistake. I will scream this from the mountaintops. Her entire defense was accepted. Those stated facts in general, maybe they would have contested one here and there, but that's not what they did. What they did was that they said she did this because she heard voices in her head, her
medicine made her do it, the devil made her do it, whatever. She's not criminally responsible. That was the entire argument of what happened in that case. And the number of women who have come out to defend this woman who go to the courthouse, who stand in solidarity with Lindsey, who come up with absolutely insane theories that Patrick did it. These women have been totally brainwashed by feminism. They have been totally sucked into the true crime podcast culture because there's no way that they, that they understand any of this. It is remarkable. Now there are some women out there that have stood up and addressed these women and said, you're crazy. You've lost your minds. She's absolutely responsible, but there is way too many women way too many women. It should be zero that defend this by the way. In fact, I've seen comparisons to other crimes where women have killed their children.
What's this? I don't want to say the wrong name, but I'm reminded of a case where a woman years ago had driven her car into a lake, I believe, to, I think she killed her three. I think there were also three children in the car. And this didn't happen. This didn't happen. Women didn't gather together and say, wow, she had things were tough. She had a lot of pressure. It's just wild to me. And if you're in that group, may I suggest that you totally, totally just do 180 on how you view life because that is insane. We start excusing mothers killing children. I don't know where, I don't know where the bottom of the barrel is from that. That seems to be scratching the bottom of the barrel to me. And so you have 11 jurors, and if you listen to the loan hold out juror, and what he said
about being in that jury room, there were eight jurors who basically were on a quest to look out for future women to try to make sure that they weren't held to account. I guess some social justice warrior project inside that jury room, according to the loan hold out juror and kudos to this guy. Great respect to the loan hold out juror, which again, will play a clip from him here in a moment. But it is insane. In these women, by the way, the jurors who were on there that were arguing for Lindsay's being not guilty or the folks that wanted to acquit her. If you listen to any of these interviews, it is. It is wild what these folks think. It is absolutely wild. One of them actually said he, Mr. Desronville, could not get over the fact that she killed those three children.
Well, of course he couldn't get over the fact that's the entire point. I wouldn't get over that fact. I've entered to say the vast majority of you listening to my voice wouldn't get over that fact. That seems like a pretty big deal. That's the entire purpose of being in that courtroom was deciding if we were going to excuse the killing of three innocent children because some doctor got up there. Some expert witnesses got up there and said the medication or the doctor or the voices in her head, somebody else made her do it. She wasn't responsible. This stuff needs to be completely rejected by our society. This insanity defense, I think is insane. I think, and listen, I saw not to get down this tangent, but I also saw on social media a defense or a divorce attorney who's representing people. I don't know if he exclusively represents men, but he's talking about how he was using
evidence. He was making arguments or planning to make those in the court if these men's ex wives or whatever wives that they were divorcing. If they're having, if they're posting things online supporting Lindsey, he was going to enter that into evidence arguing that these women aren't fit to have custody of the children. And dare I say, I think he's right. It is wild that we are to this point, my friends. There's a lot of people standing up against this in the face of this abject evil, but there's a whole lot of others who aren't. We have to talk this isn't a matter of opinion. This is right and wrong. This is good versus evil. This stuff has to be stopped. And if you think this, I'm sorry. I'm not sorry, actually. I don't take it seriously. I don't take you seriously if you're defending the behavior of Lindsey Clancy. She murdered, strangled her three children, unbelievable that we've gotten to this point.
And the defense attorney, Kevin Reddington, wants to wanted to have an investigation into the lone juror who actually held it all together and said, this is crazy. She is guilty. I'm not going to fall in line with the other 11. I'm not going to be used as some social movement. I'm here to hold this woman accountable. I'm here to for justice for her three children. That's what he's effectively saying. But I want you to listen to this. This is Fox News talking to this Ronville's attorney about what the court, what the current, what the attorney for Lindsey Clancy wanted to do to the lone hold out juror. Absolutely remarkable. I have it here. This motion, I've talked to two legal experts who tell me they have a question. They have never heard of this in their entire legal careers. I'm impressed. Not that emotion that he now refers to Michael as juror doe as to not give away his identity.
That seems to have left the room. He says juror doe should deliver the mobile telephone carried into the jury room during the period to a neutral examiner. He wants to take Michael's cell phone for 48 hours. Then he wants to bring Michael into court to examine juror doe on the record with counsel present. Your response to. I find it richly ironic that after Kevin Reddington outed Michael and stood on the court house steps and said Michael has an agenda. Michael robbed the other jurors. I find it richly ironic that now all of a sudden he's calling him John doe after the damage was already done. And the question now is do we want to have a constitution? Do we want to have a six amendment? Do we want jurors to feel safe when they show up to perform their civic duty? Because we're not going to have a criminal justice system if jurors are afraid of reprisals. That's right. And what Kevin Reddington is doing here, he is setting a nightmarish precedent.
And what would happen next time if it's the district attorney that didn't get his way because of a holdout juror? What are we going to have now? What are we going to have to do to make a prosecution doing this? We're going to have them charge. Because the table is always turned. Things always change. It's the principle that matters here. And we're consistent about that. Kevin Reddington isn't. Kevin Reddington is absolutely furious that Michael did the right thing. That's right. Yes, sense fine. So Michael DeZronville is again the holdout juror. This is the attorney. His name is Edward Paltzick. And he's talking about Kevin Reddington who's the attorney for Lindsey Clancy going after the holdout juror. So he's he added him to begin with. He then comes after him. He wants to investigate him as to why he didn't vote with the other 11 jurors.
We're now holding a juror or at least Kevin Reddington, the defense attorney is wanting to hold the juror accountable more accountable for his decision than holding his client accountable for what actually had that brought everyone in that courtroom to begin with. This is unbelievable. What's happening here? I've seen people on social media saying they're using this as a response when they've been summoned for jury duty saying, Hey, man, I don't want you want to be part of this system. I don't want to go in there and actually cast a vote and want to find out that I'm going to be criminally potentially held criminally liable for my vote on that jury. I don't want to be investigated. I don't want the radical left turned on me going to my house, my place of business calling for me to be investigated, probably in prison to maybe hang. I don't want that stuff.
Our entire system when I sit off the top that our entire civilization is hanging in the balance over these things. It is. It absolutely is. The court should not take these things seriously. If the jurors need to stick with the facts of the case and not be social justice warriors, Lindsey Clancy needs to be held accountable for what she did to those three innocent children and society needs to wake up society needs to turn to Jesus, my friends. That's what we need. I'm out of time. This first segment sit tight. You are listening to America's home for conservative, not better talk on your host, Todd Huff back in just a minute. Welcome back my friends. Don't give up here, by the way. We have, listen, I think this has awakened a lot of people, not just this case, but I think this case has awakened some people. I think that a lot of people realize now what's at stake here.
I think some people are still learning it. They have people all along that spectrum as far as where they are as far as the reality that they realize that we're facing. But the truth is we're in some dire times, but there are people that are waking up to what's at stake here, what's really going on. So we can still turn these things around, turn this thing in general around, but it's going to take a lot of work and it's going to take some effort from all of us. There's no longer, look, we don't have a moment where we can just casually consume the information and the news of the day. We don't have that any longer. What we have is a moment where the stakes are high where we have to win. We have an election in November, but we get work to do beyond that. Win or lose, and I hope that we obviously win this, Republicans win this. We've got an ongoing fight here. We've got an ongoing fight across the, what I call the eight battle fronts of this cold
civil war. We've got it in the classrooms in academia. We've got it between people who care about truth and the media. We have it between government who wants big government and tyranny and more of your money and they want you to have less liberty, those people and the rest of us. It's happening in churches. I've said this. We either have churches now who are out there proclaiming a false gospel in these progressive churches. We talked about James Tallahuretko's church. It's an example of a fake church. It pains me to say this as a follower of Jesus that there are churches, but listen, that there are churches out there that are doing these things. But Paul, what would Paul write to the church? You know, I asked someone that question recently. I said, if what do you think the Apostle Paul would write to the American church at large? I don't mean that individual denominations. What would he write to the church at large in America today? I think he absolutely, he have to address the progressive nonsense that's happening in
churches. He would also, I would think very likely address the superficiality of some of America's not all. I don't listen. Again, church by church, but there's certainly a truth that says the, the, the, the, the mega church mentality where we go in to be entertained and have all these special effects and fancy productions and everything else. We talk about things with three bullet points and then something that rhymes or whatever. Then we wonder why the average Christian doesn't understand their Bible or take it seriously. We do this in sort of a perfunctory sort of way where we can perform and go through the emotions, at least some do on Sunday for an hour, hour and a half. And then on Monday, go back to whatever it is that pleases us. That's not what biblical Christianity is. That's a battlefront as well. It's happening in our churches. It's happening in science. There's a battlefront of science. There's sciences and the problem is the people who tell us what the science is.
They're the problem. The people who said that six feet during COVID was a good thing. Later they told us that we just kind of made it up. It was just one of those things that happened. The people who stood behind these vaccines and the boosters and the boosters after that, people who denied all the evidence of bad things that were happening because of that, the people who refused to accept and acknowledge that hydroxychloroquine and Ivermectin were actually helping people overcome COVID symptoms and heal and get better. I'll go on down the list. This fight is not going to fight with entertainment. The fight with people who produce music and lyrics that are poison to the minds and the souls of those who listen to it. I know I sound like Anka here. I know that. But what am I supposed to do, my friends, pretend like that's not part of this problem. When you have a people that have lost their moral compass, they're easier to manipulate.
When they've turned their back on God, who is of course the source of all good things and goodness and truth. When you turn your back on him, you'll believe anything. You'll believe anything that these lunatics want to push down your throat. There's battlefronts everywhere. Election is just one of them, but it matters a whole lot. This stuff is permeated. It's into our government now into the courtrooms where you see this nonsense happening. Now you have women out there. Go to social media because Kevin Reddington during this hearing, we get through the first trial. There was a hung jury. Now they're trying to see what's going to happen next. These are preliminary arguments. There are women who said, look, he's up there saying that there's no evidence that she murdered, that she actually killed. We get even about murdering them, that she was actually responsible for their deaths. He's actually arguing that her attorney, Kevin Reddington in court right now.
They say, see, this is what we told you, people who said that she admitted to doing this. She didn't admit to doing this. This is a game to prevent her from being held accountable. In one respect, Kevin Reddington is doing his job. In another respect, it's absolutely this ingenuous and not serious because he did acknowledge during her trial. In fact, I've got a before and after clip here, with Kevin Reddington in the same courtroom arguing before the judge, what happened? Back at the time, he acknowledged that she killed her three children. His entire argument, Kevin Reddington, her defense attorney, was that she was suffering from postpartum psychosis and therefore should not be criminally liable for their deaths. Yesterday, he's actually up there saying who killed them. Now these women again on social media, they think we told you all along.
They think this is a great gacha moment. They have no idea what is actually happening here. They have a desired outcome, which is she's not held accountable. She's fighting against the patriarchy, whatever, right? Whatever feminist line of, I don't want to say reasoning, but the feminist argument of the day, the anti-god feminist arguments of the day is whatever that is, they're prepared to peddle it. They don't understand what's going on. But listen, I'm going to play the clip. This is put together by the Western Journal. First here, a clip of Kevin Reddington acknowledging that Lindsey Clancy killed her three children. He's trying to say that she should not be criminally liable. That was during the criminal trial. And then you'll hear him saying who says she killed them? Where's the evidence, basically, is what he said before the judge yesterday. Take a listen to this. This is a woman that did not get a medication, did not get a medical treatment.
This is during trial. This is a woman that was suffering from psychosis at the time that she went down to that basement. Hmm. This is now. Where is the evidence that she did this? So there it is, right? He went from saying that she was suffering from postpartum psychosis when she went down to the basement to kill the three children. So now saying where is the evidence that she did this? Well, fortunately, the prosecution, the prosecution has some things to say about that when it was there turned to speak before the court yesterday in this, what preliminary hearing, I guess. And this is, let me set this up correctly. This is the prosecution's response to that absolutely absurd thing that we just listened, listen to you from Kevin. We're hearing now for the first time in this argument that counsel is challenging first the, excuse me,
the sufficiency of the evidence as it applies to the three counts of murder. What we heard throughout the course of trial over and over from counsel was that there was objections to the presentation of commonwealth's evidence on the underlying murders because the defendant admits the defendant stipulates whether the commonwealth agreed to the stipulation or not. And now for the first time, the defendant is arguing that there's no evidence that she did this. For the first time. I suggest you that the entire record is voluminous as to the information supporting the fact that she did this. We have, she's the only one in the home with three young children. Should we have that her husband testified under oath that he left the house, that she sent him out on those errands, that he went to the exact places where she directed him to go, not only did she direct him to go based on his testimony, but we confirmed that with her own cell phone data that says that she made the call to the restaurant, that she made the call to CVS, that he then went there, he's on video surveillance at those locations during the time period in which these murders occurred. He comes home and he finds the children in the manner that they were in and he finds the defendant where she was.
We have all that information. We have, they are, was DNA on those exercise bands that was attributable to this defendant. And it was on the ends of those bands, the ends of those bands that she had a pull in order to strangle each and every one of those children. We have that she woke up in the hospital and spoke to a chaplain within days of organ and clonciousness where she talks about the fact that she had these hallucinations telling her what she had to do, that she had to kill the kids, and that she was glad that the kids were safer now. So there is plenty of information to support the essential elements of the charges of murder. There is information that her facts that support deliberate permittitation. There's facts that support extremitraceous cruelty. Much of them, which I would more focus on and discuss with her nurse's responsibility, but I ask your honor to consider a lot of these facts in both contexts. So the first point that there isn't enough evidence to prove that she didn't, I would suggest as a lackable argument. And based on what your honor sat through several weeks of the trial, the Commonwealth medits burden, as it applies to that. As far as a defendant who has mental illness can commit crimes and can be criminal responsible.
That's why the court, SGC has repeatedly addressed this issue. And I, you get the idea, I'm out of time. I've got to take a break my friends. Sit tight back in just a minute. Yeah, how's that for evidence? Kevin Reddington, how's that for evidence? Lindsay Clancy fan club members out there who denied that any of this even happened. You want to blame Patrick Clancy? This is unbelievable. What we're dealing with. This is not again, this is not just two different ways of looking at an issue. There, there is a sane way and there is the insane way. And we have to quit pretending. We have to quit pretending that the people who are embracing the insanity, the people who are pushing, who are excusing, who are encouraging, copycats out there, alleged copycats of women who have been, following this Lindsay Clancy trial, talking about it with friends in a text group or whatever online,
who then do something similar to their own children. This is evil. This needs to be called that. If you're supporting this, if you're supporting her, you are as a matter of fact, just absolutely wrong. And I would, if I was defending this sort of stuff, I would, I would hope, I would hope that I would be convicted and looking the mirror here. This is sick stuff, my friends. This guy talking about no evidence. Prosecution said, it's laughable. It is laughable. It's not. It's a very serious situation, but it's a laughable attempt at excusing, obviously, what she has acknowledged and her defense acknowledged in general happened in that case. Wild, wild times indeed, my friends. Here's a question for you. Do you know where your money goes after you spend it?
If the answer to that makes you cringe, if you wonder if it's going to people who are out there supporting Lindsay Clancy and the likes, well, it's time to check out Freedom Marketplace. That's what we've built to connect conservatives like you with businesses that share your values. Businesses that refuse to support this leftist nonsense. It's free for you to use. You can create a login, but you certainly do not have to. It's all about keeping your dollars aligned with your principles, connecting you with businesses pushing in the same direction you are. Visit freedommarketplace.net today. That's Freedom Marketplace.net Liberty and business for all my friends. I am just, it's dumb-founding here. I didn't mention this off the top. I'm not going to be able to get to the insanity happening in the WMBA, which is another type of insanity, but again, rooted in the same,
rooted in some of the same, I think feminist, just feminist ideology, broken worldview, just it's a mess, but I don't have time to get to that. I will have to talk about that in the inner circle, which again, you can get for free at Toddhuffshow.com. But I do want to play, where are we here? Okay, I do want to play this short video, this short video that was posted by the loan holdout juror. I want to play that here for you, my friends. It's about a minute long. Sorry, I'm getting this cute up here on my end. His name is Michael. Does Ronville? And he's just going to, he's been thrust into the scene, right?
He's the one who just stood on principle in that jury room. And now he's out there. He's been exposed. He's been attacked. He's been persecuted. He's had this defense attorney, this lunatic defense attorney, Kevin Reddington, threatened to have him basically investigated, bring him in, put him on the stand, how dare you vote to find my client guilty, to convict my client? Don't you do that? Why didn't you acquit? This has all sorts of a nightmare scenario for our system of justice in this country. Kevin Reddington doesn't seem to care. Anyway, Michael, does Ronville takes to the camera and shares his own experience, wants to thank people who have supported him or so forth. Here's what he said. Hi, my name is Michael Peggy, this round bill, also known as the lone juror. I know the whole focus has been on me, but we want to reel everything back and put the
focus on the three angels that is that's at hand. The ones that can't speak for themselves. That's right. Because I can't defend themselves and the one that can't fight the battles. And those are Korra, Dawson and Callin. A little bit about me. I want to thank God for my Catholic faith. I want to thank God for blessing me with the ability to love my daughter. And I'm foremost, I would like to thank everyone, every individual, they have supported me throughout this difficult situation. Your prayer is your emotional support. Your psychological support is a tremendous to my heart that I feel that I sense that I know. I do want to thank you for the bottom of my heart. Thank you. Yeah. That's what he has to say. A humble response from a man who's been targeted by these leftists, lunatics, these crazy,
Lindsey Clancy fan club members and so forth who refused to believe that she even did it. They think that Patrick or husband did it. Folks, we're living. We are living. Listen, this is the fruit. This is the fruit. We are living with the consequences of what we've allowed this country to become. So we can't obviously stop everybody's terrible ideas, but we have to stand up against them. And this stuff has gotten out of control. So I'm out of time here. Thank you so much for listening. I hope you have a great day. We'll talk soon. SDG.
More episodes
More from The Todd Huff Show

USAID and Latin America's Conservative Shift
The Todd Huff Show

Mamdani's Subjective Definition of Socialism
The Todd Huff Show

The $350,000 Price Tag of Democratic Socialism
The Todd Huff Show

The Lindsay Clancy Case and the Holdout Juror
The Todd Huff Show