
Ten FALLEN ANGEL Kings for Super Intelligence and CERN Moon Portals | CCNT 978
Get every episode summarized
Each time Canary Cry News Talk publishes, we email you a written briefing from the transcript — the topics, who appeared, and any specific claims, with the ad reads skipped.
Email me new episodesFree for 3 shows. No card needed.
About this episode
“See us only one thing to do when the world is holding a heart. Us this week's news and depends through the lens of Bible prophecy. You are listening to Family Cry and Use 2. Today is September 30th, 2026, where I live to tape on Episode 978.”From the transcript
Get every episode summarized
Each time Canary Cry News Talk publishes, we email you a written briefing from the transcript — the topics, who appeared, and any specific claims, with the ad reads skipped.
Email me new episodesFree for 3 shows. No card needed.
Hosts & guests
Transcript ready
1,221 searchable segments. Every word is indexed and playable.
Full transcript
Canary Cry News Talk — Ten FALLEN ANGEL Kings for Super Intelligence and CERN Moon Portals | CCNT 978. Machine-transcribed; use the interactive transcript above to jump the player to any line.
Ugh, our jingles are all obsolete! The world is getting crazier. People are acting more and more insane. The end of the world is tomorrow. Tomorrow, tomorrow. See us only one thing to do when the world is holding a heart. Listen to Basil and Gonze's status. Us this week's news and depends through the lens of Bible prophecy. You are listening to Family Cry and Use 2. Today is September 30th, 2026, where I live to tape on Episode 978. And today, Artificial Supreme Super Intelligence, signing on from off the grid, Razzle Dazzle. I'm your best buddy Basil and you are not crazy. And my name is Gonze, at face like the sun director of the Age of Deceased Films and author of prophecy without panic your favorite Asian provocateur for Christ, live to tape from the universe to bring you the best news, which is the gospel message of Jesus Christ while reporting the egregious with the well-rounded, biblically grounded take on world events.
It is Wednesday, my dudes. It is many things today, other than episode 978. It is Orange Shirt Day, which is the, I think it's Canadian, it's a national day for truth and reconciliation. And it's also national love people day. So you know, it's a, people you could replace people with magicians and occultists, maybe new ageers, I don't know, national love people day. I'm assuming it's agape love or maybe some phylo-bubble love. Probably best case. Best case scenario. I don't think it's arrows, but hey, you know, some people might take it that way. But it's also national work in AI day, ironically enough. Does that mean we all have to work in AI or something like that? I think we're celebrating working in AI, which is a perfect day.
So old news, guns. There is, what even is AI? I've erased it from my lexicon. I don't even know exactly what it's like. Oh, great. Is that where we're at? Like super intelligence or is it like, like, like, caterpillar and butterfly, you know, like AI is like a stinky little bug that wiggles around. I think it's, I is a beautiful butterfly. It's, yeah, I was going to say it's more like artificial flavors, right? It's, it's, it used to be, it's fake. It's not real intelligence, but not anymore. It has been rebranded. It is now super duper intelligence. What even is real? I think this is the question being posed by Trump, you know, people, of course, those on the anti-Trump train, they make good points about his forms of language. He talks certainly like a fifth grader. We all acknowledge that, but there's something. Let me, I could even call it super duper effective, as we've seen over the past 10, 11 years.
But as we know, our perception, our worldview, our understanding of reality is done through language. We've watched it happen in front of our eyes with what was formerly called artificial intelligence. But as we slowly, maybe boil in the pot of language, changing the way we understand things, there's only one thing that we can do, guns. That is look forward to, as you said, the next phase of evolution, which is super duper intelligence. I do want to give a shout out to who is it? 5, 7, 3 on the text message alert system. This must just be in the air, guns. You know, when the Holy Spirit moves and he's giving wisdom and insight to one person, you can usually bet that there's other people kind of tuning in on this, because 5, 7, 3,
just texted the text message alert system and says with Trump naming it super intelligence, I'm a little disappointed that it's not super duper intelligence. I think we could call it now. I think we can call it now, someday super duper intelligence. Well, he's always pushed the proverbial plane down the runway a little bit. Yeah, at any time he does something with the language, other than the magical powers he possesses, it does seem like we're running out of runway. There's only a few other places left to go that comes to progress. And you know, seems like the Bible laid out a few scenarios. There's always a potential scenario. We know where it's going. But yeah, I mean, yeah. Hey, you know, super duper, I was thinking, does he already acknowledge the supernatural? You know, because we often think of the supernatural as just the something beyond nature, right? But with Trump, it's always an upgrade. It's always like a progress of sorts.
So I want to know what his thoughts on supernatural are in general. Does he think it's like cooler nature, like super mega, mega nature? Or is it like the way we define it as a beyond nature in a sense? Yeah, you know, I think he's on to something. I think he's being very effective in the shifting of the worldview, like even not even of just people who like like him, right? Right. Of everybody. This is his thing. He even said it when he was changing it to super intelligence and his announcement. He's like, we'll see if I have the power. I think I do. We'll see if I have the power to actually change it. And you know, obviously a good setup. But I do see, I think I think we're on to something, guns. I think of course, we've always enjoyed the subtle, nuanced theological conversations about how the difference between natural and supernatural or spiritual and material,
obviously, theologically, this goes all the way back to the nostics, kind of one of the earliest. Yes, the earliest Christian examples of separating these things. But there's always been an interestingly thought experiment. What if the natural and the supernatural are not even two different categories, like in objective reality, right? Yeah, well, yeah. But they were turned into two separate categories through language and through thousands of years of, you know, people writing about the supernatural. And Trump waltz and on in, consisting that the difference between supernatural and natural might not be very different at all. Well, he's, of course, it's not artificial guns. Yeah, that's just intelligence. It just is intelligence. Do you remember this clip from Trump? So he has a propensity to go super duper,
because he had the super duper missile. So maybe before the end of his term, super duper intelligence is on the table. But also, we picked up on that too before you may talk about that for a second. We had the super psi op. Remember, we said, hey, psi ops are just not enough. It's a super psi op, you know? Super. So super duper psi op. I think he's on to something, some kind of trend where just normalcy is no longer sufficient for explaining what's happening. We must go beyond. And, you know, again, to give him credit, when you upgrade the name of something to super duper, everybody understands what you're doing. Everybody gets, it's immediately recognizable. Like a two year old will understand the difference between super and super duper. Yeah. Right. Now, okay, this is all trust me folks.
This is not just some rambling intro. This is getting somewhere. This, this, as I'm looking at our list of stories here, I'm like, oh, geez, that's kind of funny how that works. Okay, trust me, we'll make strong theological intellectual cases for all of this as we move through today's news. But first, just because it is, I mean, look, we have gone through so many super transitions, if I may, maybe even super duper transitions. Yeah. In, you know, human history that we're getting sort of, we don't even really notice them anymore. They're kind of just like that week's headlines and then we move on. But, you know, for those who don't have the shortest memory span a human can have, you know, the paradigm shift that was Trump's election, the paradigm shift, that was COVID, the paradigm shift, that was, I mean, over and over, it's Charlie Kirk,
the paradigm shift that boom, boom, boom, happening all the time. All right. So we want to make sure to be able to witness and identify when they happen, because that will go a long way to rooting us in an actual experience of time instead of just letting our brains be controlled by the algorithms. And one of these things was the announcement that he was changing artificial intelligence to super intelligence. And there's lots of good armchair theories about why this might be. But it has now officially been signed, the executive order available on White House stock of inaugurating the era of super intelligence. That is the name. Oh, our jingles are all obsolete. It's just really is. It's just with one strike of a pen completely making maybe 15 years of hour, calling it AI,
abs, obsolete, pretty remarkable on the SEO front. Of course, almost all of our jingles are created by our wonderful producers who until recently had the talent and the know how to either play music themselves, create a jingle, write it, sing it, send it over to us. It was wonderful. Then of course, AI came out and all the people with any talent suddenly are sort of dejected and living in the shadows and the motivation has been sucked from the marrow of their bones. And we really, we care about them. And we want them to thrive. But does not change the fact that we have not received a new producer made jingle in a while. Not to say. They trickle in that. They trickle in. There's some people that make some. I'm not at the volume. If a maybe authentic, honorable, noble use of super intelligence for our community,
would be to create maybe an AI-powered jingle maker or something. It's not AI. You got to start saying SI now, you know? Or are you saying like the retro age is a like returing in AI as retro? Okay. All right. Yeah. I like that. It's kind of like, right. That's what I'm saying. We stay with an AI thing, but we make an AI jingle maker or honestly, we could probably just upload the old jingles and say update this with whatever we want to do. But we're not going to do that, okay? Because we need producers to do it for us. But yeah, now AI is, it's kind of like cassette tapes or CDs or something, you know? It doesn't draw as much of our eyeer as it used to because it's, you know, it's artifice, it's old school instead of super intelligence. Now we can all be rage at the machine that is super intelligence and AI is kind of like a nostalgia kind of thing.
I'm just putting it out there. But the executive order from whitehouse.gov, inaugurating the era of super intelligence. Again, the grandiosity here by the authority vested in me as president by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America. It is here by ordered section one purpose. And, you know, we don't need to read this. Let's say this. I'll read a little bit. America stands at the forefront of new technological revolution in intelligence. The modern field of artificial intelligence was born in the United States where American scientists first gave the field its name and laid the foundations for its development. You know what I do kind of like with this executive order? There's a little bit of like national mythos building. Oh, yeah. Right. Of course. It's kind of like putting ink on paper into the official record, the humble beginnings of an upstart experiment in self-governance, the United States of America,
where they created an old timey technology called artificial intelligence. 70 years later, powered by our nation's unmatched culture of innovation, world leading companies and research institutions and entrepreneurial spirit. America is once again pushing the technological frontier forward. I'm going to go down and skip paragraph. The terminology. Nope. I'm not going to skip a paragraph. Let me read this. Extraordinary technology is being pioneered by American innovators far exceed what was envisioned when the term artificial intelligence first came into use. The capabilities of today's frontier systems do much more than imitate or automate discrete aspects of human intelligence. Okay. I think there's some pretty solid lore building here. Yeah, especially because it's a pretty solid world, you know, world crafting. One of the barriers for this type of technology was the touring test, right? The touring test was one of the things, once AI started to maybe not
with flying colors, but it did start to pass some level of touring test. And touring, I believe, Alan Turing is from the UK. Is he not? He's a British. I think so. Yeah, it's my recollection. So a lot of like the developments in logic and computation, all these different things confirmed this is. So this is like under this is I see the American revolution run it back. Run it back. Don't give the Brits any credit. This is a American innovation. That insight. Let's just do a little check. The term came from the term came from the from a Dartmouth, I believe. In like the 50s, but British person. I don't think the term came from a British person. I think it came from a Dartmouth college. I got to practice my prompting here. Your prompt. All right. Let's keep going while Grock does that. The extraordinary,
okay, let's go back here. Yes, yes. Entrepreneurial. The extraordinary technology is being pioneered by American innovators far exceed what was envisioned when the term artificial intelligence first came to use. The capabilities of today's frontier systems do much more than imitate or automate discrete aspects of human intelligence. They increasingly amplify human ingenuity and unlock new forms forms of creativity. Unlocking that. Empowering Americans, not humans, Americans to achieve what was previously impossible across science, medicine and nearly every other domain of human endeavor. Yeah, we just got to figure out how super intelligence can make the impossible possible in podcasting. That domain of human endeavor still. It's value for value podcasters into abundance. As these capabilities continue to
improve, they increasingly represent not merely artificial intelligence, but a new era of super intelligence. The terminology used by the federal government should reflect transformative capabilities of these technologies and the limitless opportunities they create for the American people. Accordingly, the term super intelligence more appropriately captures the promise, potential and rapidly advancing capabilities of these technologies. It is therefore the policy of my administration that to the maximum extent permitted by law, the executive branch shall use the terms super intelligence and SI in place of artificial intelligence and AI and will not acknowledge the usage of artificial intelligence and AI in any applicable setting. That's that's strong. I'm struggling to acknowledge AI. I was going to say this is like this also skirts from
an economic point of view, the AI bubble. Oh, there's the AI bubble. Not anymore. It's all SI now. Yeah. And you know, that has always, I mean, from the very beginning, of course, here on this show, but in general, you know, the people online are kind of understanding the way that this works more than ever, thanks to the age of re-enchantment. And the theories that first, of course, come to mind are, okay, you change the name of artificial intelligence to superintelligence, and maybe something like regulations no longer count, like state regulations prohibiting certain levels of AI that were passed across the country, et cetera, et cetera. You know, it's kind of a weak legal thing because no judge is really going to come to the conclusion that like California's AI laws don't count towards superintelligence, but what it does is it buys time.
Yes. And that's what Trump needs right now is to just buy time. You mentioned the economic bubble of AI, the whole country is on the precipice of something economically, of course. The whole economy is being buoyed by the AI sector. And this little stunt, if you will, although to call it a stunt does not give it the true cosmic implications of how it affects the entire system. Psychological, it's a spiritual, et cetera. But if we call this a stunt, it will buy Trump, you know, a year to two years of halted regulation, halting all current regulation, based on the stupid language change. All the politicians have been working on the anti or slow-down AI bill all the sudden, you change this whole language and says nothing that
says artificial intelligence is acknowledged. I mean, it's a beautiful piece of law fair because of course, when the trials and the court business finishes with this, like, yeah, of course, it's not going to stop anything. But it is going to take a couple of years for those things down for sure. For that legal system to kind of go through the process. All those law he really needs. All those lawsuits for AI psychosis, well, you're honored. There's no such thing as AI anymore. So I don't know what we're talking about. I'll be down. Our product is not artificial intelligence. So this doesn't apply to it. Wow. All right. Implementation to the maximum extent permitted by law, executive departments and agencies shall use super intelligence and SI in place of artificial intelligence and AI. In official correspondence, public communications, websites reports policy documents and other non-stattitory documents within the executive branch. Nothing in this section requires the alteration of previously issued regulations, presidential actions, contracts,
grants or other historical documents. Now, I saw some people implying that this section here, section two, paragraph B, where it says nothing in this section requires requires the alteration of previously issued regulations, presidential action contracts, grants, and other historical documents. They're saying, oh, no, it says right here in the document that it doesn't change previous laws or policies or something, but that's not what it says at all. What it says is we're not requiring you to alter any previous regulations to use this new language because they don't want the regulations to be altered to include super intelligence. They want it to stay. Sneaky both ways. Sneaky both ways. Especially because Trump signed all those deals with other countries, 500 billion from Japan. They've already got economic deals locked in. You don't want to have to
go back and change all that. That's a lot of hassle. It's a really, yeah. It really is, again, in the context of the cosmology we have here of the idea that legal codes, legal formatting, the law, etc., etc., is sort of at least spiritually descendant from the formatting of Grim Wars, the way that, all the way going back to Toth, bringing writing, blah, blah, blah. So in the sort of formatting and language that gives the impression that it's kind of a strict, this is law, right? This is how it is. This is what must be done. It's basically a document that just says like, oh yeah, nothing really changes except for we get to do whatever we want.
Which is pretty cool. Section three, definition for purposes of this order and except where otherwise provided by law, the terms super intelligence and SI mean the technologies and systems encompassed by the term artificial intelligence as defined in section 94013 of Title 15 United States code. This definition shall govern the implementation of this order unless and until superseded by subsequent presidential action consistent with applicable law or by an act of Congress. Let's see here. They got to change everything in 60 days, the assessment of weather and to what extent the definition of super intelligence and SI should modify expand upon or otherwise supersede the existing statutory definition of artificial intelligence. Oh, sorry, these are what the proposal,
they're going to take 60 days basically to write the rules on what exactly this will look like. And again, basically a document that feels very strict but basically says we're going to do whatever we want with them. Let's see here. Nothing in this order shall be construed to impair or otherwise affect the authority granted by law to an executive department or agency or the head thereof, meaning the executive branch. They're just docking the executive branch by the way. This is what executive orders are. Nobody has any, nobody's shackled. There's no boundaries put up for the any executive department or agency. It does not impair the functions of the director of office of management and budget relating to budgetary administrative or legislative proposals. So don't worry, money people. This won't affect any of the investment related grants related
stuff coming through the pipeline. This order shall be implemented consistent with applicable law and subject to the availability of appropriations, more money stuff. This order is not intended to okay and does not create any right or benefit substantive or procedural enforceable at law or inequity by any party against the United States. It's departments, agencies, entities, officers, employees, agents or any other person. The shield is up. There's no, you cannot go after the United States. So there you go. Donald Trump, President Donald Trump, the White House September 29, 2026. Thank you for your attention to this matter. It is, it is finished. It is done with the stroke of a pen. Speaking of stroke of a pen, there was something in addition to the executive order that was released and this was a joint commitment on frontier responsibilities,
the White House accord on super intelligence. We don't have to read the whole thing. This is where all the kings of AI with the exception of I think Sam Altman wasn't invited. Well, was he there? Somebody wasn't invited. Maybe not. Greg Brockman is representing open AI on this document. So yeah, not Sam Altman, unfortunately. But here's what it says, in order to build a positive future for the American people and the world, we believe every company is responsible for developing its own technology safely and in a way that builds trust with customers and the public. Build trust. Remember that? That was a whole thing. It built or not built a burger, the Wealth. The World Economic Forum last few years. This starts with every company that is training and deploying frontier models, having robust internal processes and controls to ensure that their technology behaves as intended and that any issues are promptly identified and resolved.
Therefore, in addition to any other precautions, we believe each company should implement the following four layers of controls and audits. All right, so here are the four beasts that will order them. Now, the four angels that will guard the companies. Yeah, that's our companies. There's a very interesting kind of siop attached to this whole thing here. But of course, this was Trump bringing all the Si companies together to agree to regulate themselves. That's kind of the spirit of the thing, which actually is in conflict with the pretty major media campaign going on right now. We'll get into that in a second. So number one, implement robust internal controls to monitor the capabilities and alignment of its models during training and deployment around areas like cybersecurity, biosecurity, and chemical threats, and to ensure that its models do not hack or access technical systems in unintended ways. How? How? Yeah, because they weren't
doing that before. That's just like what? What? Okay. To empower an internal team to ensure all of the controls monitoring and detection are operating as intended and that any issues are remediated. Okay. So some people standing behind a screen watching Si monitor Si guy. It's beautiful. Yeah. So far nothing that they're not already doing all do that. You could empower me. I'll be on the internal team staring at a screen and throwing a tantrum of something happens. Number three, partner with an independent external auditor or evaluator to carry out independent assessments of whether the controls monitoring and detection are operating as intended. Oh, no, no, no, no grounds for corruption there either. You know, like a third part, y auditor. I mean, what could go wrong? Number four, designate an independent committee of the board of directors to oversee and receive reports from the teams operating the controls
and the internal and external auditors and evaluators as well as to ensure any issued identified or any issues identified are remediated. Okay. Together, these steps will give each company its customers and the public confidence that the technology is operating as intended as intended as intended is. But what is the intent? What exactly is the intent? Good question. I mean, yes, the whole Siop recently has, oh no, the AIs are breaking out. Oh, they're running rampant. Oh, they're hacking things. And, you know, it only took about a week for the new cycle to catch up with like, oh, yeah, they did those things because they were told to do that. They're trying to do it. They're trying to do it. They were intended to do those things. Yeah. Or you know, you get some evil lizard person saying, I want to say coosis for the masses. And it's like, oh, that's your intention. Okay. Great. It's working perfectly. The participating companies will meet regularly to establish standards and best practices to
improve the safety of their systems over time. It may make sense to codify these steps into laws or regulations, which means they're not law or regulation yet. But I guess that's the goal. Regardless of whether this is required of companies, we believe that implementing these controls and audits is critical to ensuring a safe future for everyone and each of our companies are committed to doing this. And then you have a beautiful piece of theater, a beautiful scene in the ongoing theater of the technates and the technocratic beast system on their sort of back and forth. And then the next page, you have all their signatures, which is pretty funny. You know, when I see a signature page like this, it reminds me that these sort of demigods of the technocracy in the end are just silly little guys. Yeah, they're just people like us. Yeah, especially it's funny too
because Trump has the biggest signature. The biggest one, biggest, most beautiful. I mean, it's beautiful because you've got Sundar Pachai from Google, Daria Amade from Anthropic, Marx Zuckerberg from Metta, Greg Brockman from OpenAI, not Seymultman, Elon Musk from XAI, and then Jensen Huang down for Nvidia, the only representative of the hardware side of things. And Sundar Pachai, you know, Indian guy is signature, kind of just looks like a little, I don't know, like a doctor signature. Dario Amade does sign in cursive in like a third grader sort of cursive there. That's beautiful. Yeah. Marx Zuckerberg, very cool with what looks to be like a MS paint. It does. We're going to hang like a mouse. Yeah, we're dangling. Like a computer mouse, M, and then has this like swirly infinity symbol laden, a couple of initials after that. Greg
Brockman. I was going to say Greg Brockman is probably the the the star of the signatures here. Yeah, he's the special one. Just three letters, GDB, and done by a kindergartener. Just lowercase G, D, and a little B. I think I know I'm decoding it here, Basil. The little G is an upside down six. The D is a backwards six. And the B is a six. So he's basically just declaring to be Satan right here, six, six, six. That's where it's the number of a man. The number of a man. The Greg Brockman is the anti-Christ. We make a lot of sense. We need to we need to make that video for Tik Tok or Instagram or something, you know, and put that really ominous music. Oh, yeah, that's the only way anybody is getting any attention on the internet now. I know that's what I'm saying. Very low. We found the anti-Christ. It's Greg Brockman.
Yeah. Elon Musk. He's just Elon Musk. But then Jensen White. Oh, yeah, baby. Just like beautiful. In classic, you know this guy. Asian Asian. Yeah. Asian got whips for his calligraphy. Yeah. Yeah. It's explicitly the beauty that only an Asian mother could force upon a young Asian boy to write his signature. It's very similar to actually a couple of things. I think it reminds me of Jimmy Buffett's signature. Yeah. It's going to say just like the Harley Davids. Harley Davidson. Yeah. The H. The H on there. I was just going to say I for some reason, I thought John Hancock, the you know, the name that the signature is named after. Isn't there a famous signature of John Hancock that yeah, he's the guy. He's named after him, right? Yeah. Okay. Well, I guess it's a little bit more than the Bill of Rights or Constitution.
His second race of independence. Intense. But yeah, okay. Anyway, fun. Fun times looking at analyzing signatures. Now, there is another weird detail that people are, oh, yeah. And of course, for those who are listening, we have Donald Trump's Sharpie hypnosis signature. And says Donald J Trump, president of the United States, not United States, UNITES states, which is such a powerful misspelling. Is it a typo? Is it? Is it indeed? Is anything he does? Inaccident, the mythos is strong. I mean, especially of the United States, especially because
this document is kind of forward looking like we're changing the name of AI, such a powerful technology. United is like a, it's a past. What is it? What is it called? The part, participle part like particle or whatever. Yeah, it wasn't very good at that. It's an adjective. It's it's united. It's already done. But UNITES. UNITES is a verb, you know? It's like, it's something that's happening. United States. So I don't know if this is a, this is the kind of type. This is like the Q forum break. I mean, look, Trump's type. You had a room filled with the richest, smartest, most diabolical men on the face of the earth. And you come together like, you know, a council of elders to, you know, put out some sort of document. They obviously don't care very much about this document. There's nothing new in the document. It doesn't say anything.
It's just sort of this implication that don't worry. We're trying our hardest. We're not going to destroy the earth. Oh, don't regulate us. Don't regulate ourselves. I think to a degree, perhaps the misspelling was to draw attention on me. Maybe to discredit the document. Like the document. Maybe, yeah, maybe the little escape hatch or something in case it goes really bad or like something. I mean, the document is nothing. It is just now, okay, in the broader picture pull out a little bit here because we've been living through the sia. But oh, our AI is going to destroy everything. We need regulation. Regulate us. Regulate us. Please regulate us. Nationalize our company. And the, all the theory crafting and all the analysis of like, oh, the big AI companies want to put a moat around their business. They want to regulate any open source stuff out of the industry. They want to come and get, they want to be nationalized because then the liability of
their world ending product, you know, the will be taken on by the government instead of a corporation. A beautiful sort of example of the 100 year old, uh, technology game plan to merge, tech and, uh, in the government, you know, the engineers are now the politicians or the rulers of the world. But then they put on this little stage play. It's kind of like, it's almost like a children's play of like, no, we can regulate our shows. Don't regulate us, but there's misspelling in it. GDP signs instead of Sam Altman, you know, it's, it's really ridiculous. It's one of the same way to document like visually, the United United States is on like the same line as Black Brockman's GDP. It just looks silly. The whole thing looks very silly. And so it's obvious
that it's just sort of like another scene in the theater because if anybody, I know I'm talking about normies, right? If any normie who they are being absolutely pummeled by the, I mean, this is the, the Democrats knew, um, sort of platform. They're kind of like, okay, forget progressivism. Nobody likes that. Forget, uh, culture war. Nobody likes that. In fact, the Democrats have been banned from using the phrase culture war. They were, um, that's, you know, their whole thing now is like by their own, by the way, not by conservatives. Like, this is like, by their own. Yeah, they're bone people saying, don't use it anymore. It's not working. Regulate AI is the sort of call for the left. At least that's what the, I mean, even just the media sphere of the right, even right wing podcasters are like, you know, starting to take weird pro
AI stances. Um, so, you know, the, the siop is very strong. And I'm sure people out there listening, you've, you've noticed it because suddenly a bunch of people on the right are like, no, don't regulate AI. Let it take over. We love the robots. It's going to be great. You saw this with the flock cameras too. Um, the left are like the fighting the, the, the tech, all the garks. And they want it to be regulated. But of course, they want it to be regulated so it can be, uh, integrated into a communist government like the whole dance is being really elegantly, uh, unfolding here. And the sort of silliness, the absurdity of this document that says nothing, and has a typo that the smartest minds in the world couldn't catch. It may be, maybe it was to show that AI didn't come up with this document. You know, that was
maybe the thing. Um, or S I, sorry, S I, you're not wrong. I mean, that's our excuse when things go wrong on this show. Yeah. Is that a filtering mechanism. Yeah. So you don't think that we're AI. Yeah. Interesting. There's a lot of potential. In the, in the context of, again, writing, being a powerful form of, you know, crafting reality, the law, grim war, etc, etc. To build in, uh, imperfections to psychologically, uh, give the impression that super intelligence had nothing to do with it. It's almost like typos now are proof that the document, one angle is that typos are proof that the document is actually good. Right. But it's better if, because it came from a
human mind or something. Yeah. I mean, uh, there's the beauty of this whole thing and very Trumpian in this regard is that it just covers so many things. It's, it's like one stone and it has, it just the, I guess we're kind of in that age. And especially when it comes to this technology, because it covers everything, he's able to just do a whole lot, like politically, economically, uh, magically, but it buys him time, buys him some time for stock. The documents just, I mean, he's, he's very good at what he does. Now, there are some other interesting parts of this too, because remember, when it comes to all this language and this writing and the laws and stuff, it's not just legally, it's not just sort of politically, but there's also a psychological and at the bottom of it, a moral implication to these things. And, uh, here's just a nice little clip,
reporter asking Trump a question about this particular document. And he had some interesting things to say. Sorry, question was about, I mentioned about it. People looking at this would be worried Oh, no, is there no sound? I think that's the wrong one. Hold on. I think that's the wrong one. That was the age of abundance. Oh, Elon. No, no, that's the Elon's, that's the Elon, uh, URL. There's one before that. Okay, hold on. The, oh, I see it. I see it. Yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah. Okay, I just had it in a different order here. Here, here we go. They came together and they did something that few people really, it's almost like a constitution in a way. And the biggest, and the biggest people in the world signed that, and I signed that as president, and it really is a form of protection. They understand that they have to self-police. It is very hard for somebody to come out, say, get into these, these models are very complex. And again, I believe they're going to be used for the good, and when
they're not, we're going to be able to nap them. But there's going to be a tremendous self-policing aspect. We're also thinking about forming a committee of sorts where we put maybe 10 people on that committee. It could be from that group so that we can, so the committee can watch over the whole end to president. Is this a poor that everybody signed? Is it binding in any way? I think it's morally binding. Oh, it's morally binding. I think, I love it. I think it's morally binding. It's morally binding. Huh? So you've got the language of protection. This is the protection we need. This is the self-policing. This is morally binding. We can trust this document because of the morals of these S.I. billionaires because, of course, nobody trusts the morals of anyone more than billionaires tech oligarchs. Let's get the tech oligarchs to form a committee of maybe 10
interesting. I don't know. I'm not about the 10. 10 kings in a second here. But yeah, and have them watch over this technology. Okay. Yeah. I don't feel any more confident about the safety of this technology. In fact, I kind of feel a little bit worse actually. I said it. I said it. I'm going to be here and I'll say it again, Ghan's. Everything's going to be fine. Was it last year that everything's going to be different by the January of 27 or was it 26? I forget. I'm I was 26. 25 was 25. I think it was just 25. Was everything's going to be different. And then 26 was these are we should really make more of a cultural, you know, for our community. A community culture of these beginning of year, uh, Modos, right? The yearly model is the theme of the year. Yeah. The theme of the year, right? The theme of 2025 was everything's going to be different, unrecognizable theme of 2026. Everything's going to be fine. Don't worry.
Alex Jones is saying that Trump is moving against open AI and anthropic. He's who say Alex Jones is saying what is that Trump is moving against open AI and anthropic. And it's a it's a whole different side of things. Yeah, of course. I mean, that's that's the beauty of it. But the war of nobody knows what's going on. Okay. If you think you know what's going on, you don't. That's the whole point. Uh, all of this time, all of this energy, all of this media, all of this money, all of it to try to convince you that it's oh, the AI's evil. Oh, it's going to kill us all. Oh, it's not going to kill us all. Oh, they want to be nationalized. They want to be regulated. No, they want to self-police. They want their committee of 10 kings. The silliest thing that one can do. And as usual, this is kind of the like a mainstream Democrat idea. Is that they're just stupid? They just don't know what they they're doing. I mean, that is such a beautiful camouflage
and defense that actually protects the, you know, the lizard people. But you can also make the same mistake to say, you know, oh, we're seeing the plan that we know their real thoughts. We know the no, no, no, no, no, no, it's all an illusion, baby. It's white noise. It's static. We have no idea what's going on except like the theme of 2026 in the Canaryam, Elon has some pretty cool ideas about what the future is going to be like. Oh, is there no sound? Hold on. It's coming on my side. Is it? I have no sound. Let's try this again. Here we go. What are they going to do? Well, I think it is worth highlighting the positive benefits of AI, which will be the SI. Thank you. Superintelligence. We're correct. I think my fondness likely outcome is
the nature of abundance, where we don't have just universal basic income, we have universal high income. And yeah, people speak about medical benefits. I think the, but maybe it's worth a bit more about when you have robots and you have superintelligence. It means that everyone in the world can have better medical care than anyone here, who may and would not be wonderful. Well, jobs are going to change. Jobs of voice change. But it can be a computer. It used to be a job. Used to be buildings for the people, do calculations. But now, digital computers do those tasks. I don't think anyone is pining to go back and do calculations all day to do bank interest rates, which is what they used to do. So I think we'll see an evolution of roles. And as the President has mentioned, the, as I was though, unemployment has increased. In fact,
there's a tremendous demand for people. So I think the most likely outcome, as probably worth looking at the most likely outcome, is one which is incredibly beneficial and so future that you, if you could look into the future, it is a future you would want. Elon and I sat with President Xi the other day and he will take every data center that we don't want. You agree with that? He's done. He would love to every single one because you know why? That's smart. They want every data center. They want it because that's great for China. Well, it's great for us. And we're leading by a lot. And we're going to keep it that way. It's going to be also going to be very, very safe. There's a self policing and there's also a group policing. And it's going to be great. It's going to be great. Everything's going to be okay. It's going to be great. There's self policing. There's a group policing. There's going to be universal high income. It's going to be utopia. Don't worry. See? Look, there's nothing to worry about. God.
I guess they're going to keep us all distracted. Look, I still stand by my statement at the beginning of 2026. Everything's going to be fine. I don't think it's going to be fine in the way that they are telling us it's going to be fine. It's going to be fine in like the completely unexpected creator of the universe has a plan to execute on this earth and with his people with his children that you know, any worry that we ever had will have been in vain just like he tells us in scripture and you know, everything's going to be fine. If it turns out that we live in, I don't know, some sort of utopia, which I'm sure won't be as bad as they make it look on the TV guns.
You know, there was this, there's been this theme in artificially generated videos. There's like a meme or a trend right now where people are just asking their AI simple prompt like make a video about what the next 30 years with AI will be like. And so the AI is, you know, presenting its own propaganda basically. And one theme that keeps popping up and they're putting a lot of emphasis on they being the super intelligence is don't worry. Some people will merge with the AI and they'll upload their brains and they'll be living in this this new form of reality where the the blending between material and digital means blah blah blah the whole thing. This sort of technocratic, you know, utopian idea. And there'll be people who will want nothing to do with the AI. And that's
okay. There's like this injection of, you know, super intelligence being like, you don't have to don't worry about it. That's okay. We certainly won't deploy our killbots to come get you. Somebody's got to grow the food. Don't worry. And out of the chaos of the messaging about AI apocalypse and regulation, non-regulation, nationalization, self-policing blah blah blah. It's got this sort of an overwhelming effect that when one comes in contact with the one little detail where it sounds like the AI wants us to think that we can opt out if we want. I see a lot of people just like, yeah, okay. That's we'll see. All right. Yeah. I, you know, I this with the way things are going, I don't think we're going to have, I'll say this.
We're probably going to have the good, the bad, the ugly with, with like with any new technology. You're going to see some things that are probably arguably good for society. Some things that are bad. But because we're from a biblical world view, we are in this fallen state. So even if we solve some problems, like immediate problems with, I don't know, food distribution or whatever, like homelessness or some of these big issues, inevitably the fallen human being is going to find or discover new problems. So I don't know. I think all this is what's launching people into the reenchantment. The ideas. Yeah. All right. So just to keep the train moving here, we don't want to forget the 10 kings. Okay. Okay. Yeah. Specifically. Yeah. We're in the committee. Maybe 10 maybe 10. I like that. Okay. So the 10 kings. Did you want to talk about the AI chat bots thing? The story there? Oh, I will. Yeah. Oh, it's, it's your 10 kings
that the full Bible study thing? It's not a full Bible study. It's just a quick one. Just a quick one down. I see we have, you've got another. Okay. Yeah. I'll do the, I'll do my story after there. Okay. Okay. Great. Great. Okay. So real quick on the 10 kings. Obviously, well, not obviously, if you're new to this information, then you can read about the 10 kings in Revelation 17, specifically around verses 12 through 14. It's the whole chapter is about mystery Babylon. But around to verse 12, it says this, I'm going to start with 11 actually, the beast that was and now is not is an eighth king who belongs to the other seven and is going into destruction. There's a lot of eschatology and theology there. So I won't get into it. But then verse 12, the 10 horns you saw are 10 kings who have not yet received a kingdom, but will receive one hour of authority as king along with the beast. These kings have one purpose to yield their power
in authority to the beast. And the whole point of the, this, this coalition of kings, they will make war against the lamb and the lamb will triumph over them because he is the lord of lords and king of kings. And he will be accompanied by his called and chosen and faithful ones. So this is like really at the end here. You have the 10 horns, the Revelation 13 describes a beast. Part of that beast has 10 horns as part of its description and Revelation 17 interprets that for us. So we don't have to speculate the 10 horns are the 10 kings. They don't have a kingdom when they form, but they receive authority with the beast and amongst this whole one hour, that one hour detail. That does not always occur to me when I think of the 10 kings. Yeah, so it's something that again, it could be, because we've heard over the years, the 10 kings or the 10 rulers that represent different parts of the earth. And there's like a coalition of 10,
maybe the United Nations or the EU, although it's funny because they get to like 10 nations and they're like, this is it. And then they keep going. And now it's like 15 nations or something. But so it could be one of those things. Yeah. So they don't initially get the possession of the kingdom, but they do receive that authority. And they're politically aligned because it says there are one mind. Right. This is where a lot of the hive mind stuff comes from. One hour is a third of these kings have one purpose. It says one purpose in this one, but other translations say one mind. And they voluntarily give their power to the beast and ultimately make war with the lamb. Now as part of the lead up to this, I think actually it's mentioned here. Yeah, it's mentioned later in verse 16 and below. And that is that these 10 horns in the beast will hate the prostitute. Now, who's the prostitute? It's mystery Babylon. It's the Harlot. And if you get the holistic view of things, the beast fornicates with the Harlot, mystery Babylon. And that's how the merchants get wealthy
and all these different things. Now, there are a lot of different views on who mystery Babylon is. Some people say it's just the religious system of the world. Some people say it's actual Babylon, like the literal physical Babylon coming to power again. Other people say it's Jerusalem. Like N times eschatological Jerusalem. That one seems to make the most sense to me, but I'm not here to argue those things. I'm just telling you the different views of who mystery Babylon is. Clearly it is some entity or city, if you really study revelation, it is a city in the end. Some people say the Vatican. I think that's a big one Rome is mystery Babylon. But ultimately the beast fornicates with the Harlot and they make wealthy merchants and all these different things. And in the end though, the beast turns on the prostitute. And this is that moment here. The 10 horns and the beasts that you saw will hate the prostitute. They will leave her desolate and naked
and they will eat her flesh and burn her with fire. Not pleasant. For God has put it into their hearts to carry out his purpose by uniting to give their kingdom to the beast until the words of God are fulfilled. And the woman you saw is the great city that rules over the kings of the earth. Interesting. So it is a city that rules over the kings of the earth. Now politically, geopolitically, I mean, it's kind of hard to nail down what that is currently. Is it the UK? Is it New York? Is it, you know, there are different arguments? Is it the Vatican? So these are up for debate. But I think in the end times, Basil, it's going to be very clear. There's going to be a city that the world looks at and says, Oh, they're in complete control of of everything. Commerce, Mert, you know, all this stuff. And then again, we're at this point where we feel like it's everything's just about to end because there's so many changes in all this. But we don't know.
We have to stay humble about the fact that we don't know the day or the hour. We can kind of feel that things are obviously changing and all the different parts seem to be coming together. But they can just be a very powerful iteration of things that the Bible describes. And we may be living through a very powerful archetype of such things or what it might look like in the end. But it's hard to say. Now, if it is eschatological, great city, great city, the great city is Palo Alto. It's going to say it's actually Zion, Illinois or something. Well, Revelation 12 describes the great city as the place where the Lord was crucified. If that's not Palo Alto, it's probably not Palo Alto. Unless you believe that conspiracy, there is a conspiracy theory out there, Basil. The California is Israel. Israel is real, Israel landmass. So I mean, you know, I can't throw anything out the window yet.
The other passage that kind of alludes to this a little bit is Daniel 7. This is kind of where the 10 Kings idea comes from. Daniel 7, verse 24, I believe is the parallel passage. Let me get down here. But here we go. The fourth beast is a fourth kingdom that will appear on the earth, different from all the other kingdoms. And it will devour the whole earth, trample it down and crush it. And the 10 horns are 10 Kings who will rise from this kingdom. After them, another king, different from the earlier ones, will rise and subdue three kings. He will speak out against the most high and oppress the saints of the most high, intending to change the appointed times and laws. And the saints will be given into his hand for a time and times and half a time. Again, lots of Bible studies on this topic from a preterist view, partial preterist view, pre-trip view,
post-trip view. Everyone has a particular version of what this is talking about. But I think the big takeaway is that there will be this 10 King coalition that is part of this final beast kingdom and that there will be another one that rises up. And there's more written about the little horn in other spots here, but this little horn, this other one, it says it has eyes like a human or speaks like a human, which is like, oh, is it not human then? So that makes you wonder, like, what is this thing? And that little horn takes out three of the kings here and then basically takes over the entire beast. So there's a lot of moving parts here. And it's so tempting to identify an Obama or even Trump to be like, oh, is the Antichrist. This is a Jared Kushner. And I know as Jared Kushner, I see I still see a lot of that. And I just for those people who are there in that mindset, I just implore you to allow God to speak what he says in the word to study it and
to let it resonate. Let the Holy Spirit show you what we don't know and humble us in that way. Because I think dying on the hill of some of those ideas is not the way to go. It's not a good witness per say. Now we that's I think, uh, go ahead. I think the little King with the weird eyes, it comes out and subdues the other Kings. I think it's Greg Brockman. Yeah. You know, after that signature, I think he's the one. I think you might be right. Yeah. I mean, uh, truly, this is diabolical 666 coded right into his signature here. Uh, I'm, you know what? We really should make that video basal because if somebody else hasn't, I mean, we might as well be us. You know, do I have to, what do I do? What does this thing called, uh, Instagram? What is it? Insta group, group, Instagram? No idea. Just have a idea. It's a, it's a side to you, sir. So there you go. That's kind of a quick rundown of the Ten Kings idea. There's not a whole lot in there about it. But Revelation 17, Daniel 7 certainly references it in context with this larger beast system,
the end times, uh, conversations, saints being conquered. These are themes that keep coming up. So if, if there is a iteration of this in our lifetimes, the one thing that will know is that the saints will be persecuted. And I'm not talking like, uh, I got kicked out of burning, man, for sharing the guy. That's not what I'm talking about. I'm talking about persecution, like blood being shed. It's interesting how the Ten Kings, uh, in relation to the sort of AI, CEO gang or whatever, has been like pretty coherent for a couple years now. I know. It's not that out of the question right now. It's kind of stayed. Yeah, it's kind of stayed pretty. Now, I did notice that there are seven signatures here, including trumps, which means only six are from the, uh, the tech leaders. So, you know, there's still four seats open. Who's going to take it? Uh, maybe they're keeping a, you know, there's some, some people that they're keeping the seat warm for.
But anyway, you know, I on that Greg Brockman guy. Greg for some. Greg Brockman is the anti-Christ. That's our next. I mean, look at this signature. Look at this thing. I know. That is just diabolical. Look at that. I mean, only the devil, only the devil would code six, six, six right into his signature, just like that. Okay. Now, there's some interesting, of course, this we got policy, we got prophecy, we got all sorts of AI, SI, it's all a really big deal, God's. But here's the thing. I don't know if you've noticed it, but people are starting to notice it. It's finally happening, guns. The robots are reprogramming our brains, uh, and causing us to become more like them. Now, of course, theologically, we know this as believers, we know the, sources we choose to read the things we choose to set our mind upon. These are the things that, uh,
influence most how we develop, well, we turn into what we transform into, of course, keeping our eyes on Jesus as always, the key because we want to be more like him every day, and yet part of the fallen human condition, um, is that we are so influenceable and not only in how we act or what we do, but also how we think and how we perceive the world. There is this, article came out from the Wall Street Journal, about 12 hours ago. Now, the Wall Street Journal, has really cracked down on their paywall. So I had to get MSN here who mirrored it. And it's, uh, headline is, now we're all starting to talk like AI chatbots too. Now, my dear, dear Swedish friends, I want you to know, I love you. I am you. But the fact that this transformation is starting
in sort of the Swedish corporate culture, um, there's nothing that makes more sense to me than this. Sarah Wimmercranes recently found herself opening a work meeting with what's often referred to. Now, keep in mind, can Elon just told us he was asked specifically by a reporter about what will happen to all the laptop jobs, what will happen to all the, all the office work. And this is where he, once again, introduced the hypnotizing pitch for universal high income. And so I'm really concerned guns. I'm concerned for our listeners, our producers. I'm concerned for everyone out there who works in this kind of environment, an environment, guns that you or I have now been eternally banished from. We'll never be able to experience the joys of working a laptop job, in some corporation, whether from home or in office. But seeing this mainstreaming recognition
of the transhuman transformation taking place, uh, should encourage us all to go out and start a farm. It isn't more than ever. Sarah Wimmercranes recently found herself opening a work meeting with what's often referred to as contrast framing a linguistic tool favored by chat bots. This is not a morning meaning she began its resets. Okay. It was just as Wimmercranes feared she ingested so much AI generated content that it's now coming out of her mouth. Now look, it's not what goes into a man's mouth guns. It is what comes out of a man's mouth that defiles him. Thank you. Jesus. Quote, we just sound like bots says the founding partner of a venture capital firm in Stockholm. Wimmercranes says conversation at the office increasingly sounds like it came straight from
Claude or chat to be team. She finds herself using more punchy phrases and partaking in an unsweetish practice. This is my favorite part partaking in an unsweetish practice giving fawning feedback such as telling someone their brilliant or so smart just like a sick of fanatic large language model would serve up. Yes. If you're ever in this situation and a Swedish person tells you that you did a good job or that you're brilliant, you need to turn and run. There's some sort of there's some sort of diabolical presence in the oppressing that Swedish perhaps even possession that Swedish person. Quote, in Sweden, the culture would just be quietly listen, she says, it's not nothing. You're right to push back. I mistakenly repeated a common myth is fact. That's on me. But here's the honest truth. People are spending so much time with AI that they're adopting chat
bots' favorite phrases in conversation. Slack's emails texts. Some call them LLLemisms. LLM is not a good one. LLM is not an LLM is a hard to say. That doesn't roll off the time. We're going to find another name. Others refer to it as Claude speak. I like that better. Will Barnett, head of recruiting for a Bay Area startup swears he still speaks like a human, but finds AI use is influencing his communications over Slack and email. His writing has a certain formality and genericness that doesn't always feel like him. Quote, I will catch myself when I'm writing where I'm like, oh my god, I shouldn't have written like that. Wait, I shouldn't have even written that. I should have just let AI do it because it sounds the same, he says. It's trained me to be more like it instead of the river. That's what happens, guns. When you summon the demon, you draw your solomonic binding sigils on the floor. You want to conjure a demon to do your
farm work for you. You start telling it what to do and you find out that you're no longer got your hands on the reins here. Barnett 42 has taken to editing correspondence. He wrote himself to make it sound less like AI, which he notes would be quote the exact same workflow if I was actually just using an LLM. Ali K. Miller, an AI advisor to Fortune 500 companies who lives in New York says that in a recent group chat with founders, the conversation turned to caveman speak. It's their name for a hyper direct and cost effective prompting style that uses as few words as possible to direct the AI. So this is my favorite part about this because of course, yes, people are being trained through reward, by the way. We learn to speak and we gain new styles of speech
or idioms or things like that based on the feedback that we get when we try to use them with other people. And what's happening is AI and constant interaction with AI chat bots. You're going through a sort of synthetic dopamine, basically drug reward response like a mouse, you know, who learns how to press a button to get cocaine or something. But my favorite is this caveman speak because during the token-maxing era that were corporations were all trying to use AI as much as possible, they found that the AI would understand them even if they didn't really even understand what they said themselves. And so they would sort of shorten everything to the sort of caveman style of talk and the AI was still able to understand and execute what they wanted to do. And so it's actually
devolving these particular humans to go back to a simpler time, Gons. We all crave a simpler time. And maybe this is it. Social media didn't rule our lives when money wasn't the most important thing. Let's just keep going back to an even simpler time where like adjectives didn't exist. And big problem. Stick, pointy stick, kill. Quote, they all share that their caveman speak was bleeding into there every day and that they would say things like, why no bullets? She says. She never explains exactly why the phrase, why no bullets? What the conversation was? What was this person? That might be it. Okay, okay, you get that. That's better. You might still be able to work in the corporate world, Gons. Because I did not think of bullet points. So I was like, why is this guy talking to AI about guns? Miller says she has a new appreciation for any
piece of writing that predates ChatGPT's launch in November 2022. And for words that an LLM would be unlikely to spit out, quote, cacophony, she says, wistfully, man, I don't think I've ever seen AI write that word. Because top LLMs respond so well to upfront goal statements. This is kind of where it starts getting weird, where we're getting into theory of mind here, where it's not just people's language is changing, but the actual process with which their brain interprets the world starts changing. Because top LLMs respond so well to upfront goal statements, Miller said people will sometimes prompt each other in team meetings, quote, if someone is rambling, we'll often interrupt and say, what is the goal? She says such prompts serve to speed up the person talking. It also helps the AI agent recording the meeting to take better notes.
Now this is something that we don't have any interaction with, but we got to remember in these corporate environments, when they're having a meeting, AI is now also in the meeting. And the AI is brought into the meeting to take notes and kind of translate what was said in the meeting into whatever actionable, corpo bullet points or something. But as literally anyone with an ounce of spiritual discernment could have told you five years ago, we are not training the AI, the AI is training us to make its job easier, by the way, because training humans to speak a certain way for the benefit of the AI is really an impressive example of honestly just how it's very similar
to how sin is sort of trained in us, but like by often supernatural entities, right? I mean, of course, we are capable of our own sins and comes from the, you know, the dark desire of our heart to overcome the world with our own will. And of course, not submit or surrender to God's will, et cetera, et cetera. But in the same way that sin will train us for its benefit, addiction being an example of this, but you know, you could even even speech, core speech, begins more core speech, et cetera, et cetera. This is a pretty concerning. Let's see here. Let me jump back into this here. Where was I? If someone rambling? Oh, yeah, I love that too. If somebody's rambling in a meeting, kind of like maybe you and I can start doing this to each other, Gans. If one of us is like on a real rainbow, what is the goal? What is the goal? What is the goal? What is the goal? What is the goal? That's really fascinating that this article brought it up,
because I was perusing some of the sources to that executive order. And one of them was, maybe it wasn't the exact executive order. I got to double check that. But anyway, I was looking at some of these older documents that use the phrase superintelligence. And one of them is a document from 2008 called Machine Superintelligence, doctoral dissertation submitted to the faculty of Informatics of the University of Lugano and partial fulfillment of the requirement for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy presented by Shane Legg. And one of the things he talks about in this paper is that the idea of superintelligence, or what he calls machine superintelligence, would be something that is capable of achieving a vast range of goals in a wide range of environments. So even from the very beginning in 2008, the context of superintelligence was something that can achieve goals, like a wide range of goals in a wide range of environments. So of course,
just bringing that up because it just popped up. And I thought it was interesting, given the fact that your article here is talking about these folks wanting to get to the bottom of you. Get to get to the point is basically what they're saying. That's you got to we got a caveman speak at what goal? What goal? Daniel Wolkowitz, who lives in San Francisco and works at an AI startup has started to find it difficult to tell whether a slack or email message was written by a co-worker using AI or one who is unwittingly started writing like AI. What he does know is more messages come through with phrases like quote, it's not this, it's that quote, these are the problems and quote, this is how it happens. Quote, my hunch is that we're atrophying our brains. Yeah, it's a good hunch. Atrophying our brains. And what's never mentioned in this article is that we have the actual studies that that's exactly what's going on. They're calling it cognitive offloading.
Actually, making us dumber the more we use AI. Yeah, this guy's got a hunch that it's atrophying our brains as Wolkowitz 38 quote, as a secondary result, I suspect that more people are starting to naturally communicate that way. Depond meta who lives in San Francisco and runs the AI startup deep in meta. Come on, man, that is not real. Started keeping the equivalent of a swear jar, but for prompt speech at the office. Instead of a jar, there's a whiteboard. And every time someone speaks in AI like language, they get a tally mark. Oh boy. Words and phrases, you know, it's in a corporate environment. You got to make things fun somehow, you know, I'm looking at some of these words here. Genuinely, that's definitely a clawed thing. I've noticed that. I've talked about that before. Node bearing. Ironic. Yeah. Yeah. Node bearing. Inverient pros, gate left shift, gate leak provenance. The problem with this type of thing though is that we're almost giving too much
credit to the LLMS because I mean, these are words that we use before. I don't think so. Well, no, no, no, no, no, what I'm saying though is that these a lot of these words are words we used before LLMS. It's all of course, every word I know what I'm saying like is words we use. But what point is it's the hyphen debacle all over again. There's a group of people who are like, I love hyphens. I use hyphens all the time. I was reading. I'm going to keep using hyphens. I'm okay. All right. No, but I'm reading what book was I reading? I think I was reading Dr. Heizard's unseen realm and he uses hyphens or m dashes, not hyphens, but m dashes. Of course. So it's my point. Yeah. So he must have been using AI before it came out. You know, it makes sense. No, the point is it's going both ways. Yeah. Okay. LLMS are distr- they're simultaneously disassembling appropriate speech by using words so repeatedly that whenever you hear them,
it sounds like AI. So that those words are like no longer viable. It becomes a sort of again, a white noise sort of confusing siop type situation. Words and phrases are already read that one. If you have the most tally marks at the end of the week, you pay for happy hour. David Bohegen of Washington, DC, who works as a non-profit CEO, has a theory that much of AI speak is drawn from the same linguistic style that classically trained business professionals and lawyers have been using for years. Yeah. You probably would have that theory, David Bohegen. Yes. It's so good. It's classically trained professionals. He boasts some things here in the next sentence. He says he's read 500 business books before AI came out. So yeah, quote, I had read 500 business books before AI came out says Bohegen 56, quote, and AI has read those same books and 500 more.
Not a strong case, Mr. Bohegen, but okay. Bohegen has long been throwing out prompt-like directions, such as, quote, think like an analyst or let's red team this. Now, I think there's a little bit of like Silicon Valley speak getting mixed in with this. But again, that's kind of the point. The discrediting of human language by the co-opting of the LLM. And in this case, we're talking language. And that's one thing. And of course, language controls are perception. So even just through repeated use, AI can sort of, I mean, almost literally hit the delete button on a series of semiotic or words, you know, symbolic symbols that we used to represent the world around us. But applying them, kind of staining them with the category of AI speak to a degree, kind of at least discredits
the way those words describe the world around us, if not totally, kind of obliterate them. Quote, bottom line up front, he says, quote, B-L-U-F was an acronym back in the day. Now people get it more when you say that. Okay. Angela Nibbs, we've got a lot of, a lot of testimony here. By the word of their testimony, we will learn that LLM sir controlling people's brains. Angela Nibbs has spent 20 years working in PR trying to get executives to not use corporate jargon. AI is making that even harder when Nibbs asks founders why they started their company instead of sharing a story, they'll launch into three key pillars, the market opportunity and their competitive differentiation. Quote, everyone sounds polished, she says, but no one sounds particularly interesting. A little bit like this article. I was about to say the market opportunity and their competitive differentiation sounds like a LLM came up with that line to try to explain itself.
Yeah, well, I think that's yeah, I think that's kind of the point. She, I will say in her artistry with this article, she's, I'm assuming intentionally put did some writing that is like hyper LLM speak. One of the examples was it's not nothing. You're right to push back. I mistakenly repeated a common myth is fact. That's on me. I mean, that's chat you be to. I'm stuck on the sentence here when Nibbs asks, asks founders why they started their company instead of sharing the story, they launch into three key pillars, the market opportunity, that's one and their competitive differentiation, that's two, what's the third one? Is that another human error to make it seem like a human wrote this? Is that what's going on? Oh, I took it that the three key pillars was like a reference to a thing. That's a now.
Let me give you the three key pillars as to why I started the company. Which is an interesting, I mean, again, there's an interesting observation to make because that particular, now if someone is maybe not very familiar with these kinds of people or these kinds of spaces, a little bit of insight is in that kind of founder communication, kind of culture. Storytelling was always very important when talking about your business. This is a big thing in marketing as well. I mean, it's a big thing in a lot of things because story, as we've explored many times before, and I think we've done even, or me and Dr. Christopher Ryan Gaetz did several raffle episodes about how story is, if not the main one of the primary gifts that God gave us, that separates us from the rest of creation, where dogs don't tell stories to each other. They
also don't tell stories to themselves, which is why they don't have what we would consider sentience in the way that we think of sentience. Our perception, our whole life is a story that we tell ourselves every day we wake up. You go, oh, I'm basil, I'm a podcaster. I got to do a show. I did it it this sort of fictional or non-fiction series of ideas about who we are and how we got here, you know, story very important. So in like a business, entrepreneurship world, there's like the power of story. If you want to sell your business, make it a personal story that'll connect with people on the soul level, etc, etc. And so for in kind of the most, I guess, gross and annoying way in the most gross and annoying cultures, corporate, you know, startup and tech culture, which, you
know, probably we'll see how long any of that lasts really. But they, the ones that are coming contact most with AI are having the humanity sucked right out of their language and their theory of mind, taking the very concept of like telling a story out of the communication process and inevitably turning us all into mindless, soulless robots, God's just like the old Chipsy woman said, do you know who Benjamin Stasio is? Okay, well, just to round out this little section on AI slash SI, there is a phenomenon bezel Benjamin Stasio. I don't know if you've seen this go hot dog man.
Yes, very good. Okay, this is the meme. Do you have something specific? This is for those who are just listening. There's a man. There's a video of a man. He looks like a hot dog with a mustache and he's dancing at a party and nobody can tell if it's AI or not. According to an article that was published today by Dexerto, who is Benjamin Stasio viral triple mustache man with Thicknick is actually an AI character. So not really really disappointing. I mean, that's tough. I thought he was just a weird looking guy. Yeah, I know. All right, I'm an era. You know, I don't know. I got signed out of our thing. Well, probably just in time to think some producers, God's we got to think some people. God, thanks of people. Because of course, we don't have investors or advertisers or products or really anything. Okay, we are on the value
for value model. We only exist because of the revolutionary concept that human beings in the power and the story that God has blessed us with have the ability and even the motivation, the obligation sometimes to realize that the economic, not just the media, the language, the symbolic systems around us are controlling us at all times, but also the economic systems are crafting how we see how we participate in the world, convincing us that transaction is our primary value as an economic unit. But here, that's not the case. We are on the value for value model, which means we don't take any money from corporations, companies, cartels, advertiser sponsorships, affiliate codes, nothing like that. We have existed for this long purely on the revolutionary idea that if we get value from something in our lives, we have the opportunity to participate
in keeping that thing alive with our own value. This cycle of value is all the way back to the beginning here. And so if you get any value from this show whatsoever, whether it's this episode, a different episode or all the episodes combined, we encourage you to think about a prey about it and put some value back in with your time, your talent or your treasure. Lots of ways to become a part of the show. And if it were not for our producers in all the different ways that they produce, there would be no show. You can support the show with your time. If you have a skill or motivation, to help us build something to provide more value for the community, this could be, I don't know, software, a building. If you're a talented person or working towards becoming a talented person, you can create art, create music, create jingles, just create whatever you create. What point?
What point, Basil? What goal? What goal? What is goal? Go to canarycry.art to upload your art and your stuff there. Or you can support the show financially by going to canarycry.support. I think you had a moment of startled. I don't know what it was. I think it took a moment to process. I got to get a faster processing. Well, it took me a second because you said point. Yeah. Well, I thought you were being like, at what point do we do something? No, no, yeah, I should have said goal. I would have. Okay. Sorry. That's the thing. You got a prompt correct. I got to sharpen my prompt engineering. Okay. Got it. Okay. Yes. You can support the show. If I God bless all of our monthly producers, people who go to canarycry.support is a yes. Let's keep it going. I want to produce the show on a monthly regular basis in whatever amount works for you.
Whatever God is calling you to do, that is all it takes. Of course, we've got some incredible opportunities, I should say, for monthly producerships. You can go to canarycrysupplydrop.com. And for 3333 a month support the show. Keep us going. In every quarter, we're going to send you a big old package filled with cool canarycry stuff. If you like t-shirts, you can go to canarycrytshirtcouncil.com. Sign up there for 1984 a month every quarter. You're going to vote on a t-shirt and get it for free. What are you going to do? Where else can you get free t-shirts? Almost nowhere these days. Thanks AI. Or you can support the show on a singular basis for any individual episode. If you come in and support the show for 100 bucks or more for any individual episode like this one, we call you an executive producer. And I want to thank our executive producer for today, Gonson. I bet you know who it is.
It is the man the myth, the legend. Sir, Alex protocol. Executive producer. Sir, Alex protocol. V2 Baron of the brain protocol. Coming in for 100 bucks, 33 cents. Wow. Got a 525 episode streak and a 181 executive producer streak. Man, thank you. Amazing. Thank you very much. Sir, Alex protocol. We got some people came in under the executive producer amount. These are our producers for today. We have producer Julie S. Julie S. Thank you. Good to see you. Julie S. Send a little notes. Continue prayers for the UK. Everything is crazy here and getting more so daily. Can't say, but you can read for yourself. Hopefully. Oh, yes. Yes. Actively being censored, even on this note she's sending us here.
Brain free. Julie S and all of our UK listeners. Producer Stacy D went on over and joined the supply drop. 33, 33 month. Thank you very much. Stacy D. She's going to be getting her canary cry calendar. Right. In this fourth quarter of 26. Of course, we've got producer Rebecca T. Coming in again, 11 11. She's on a 62 episode streak. Incredible. Rebecca, she's on a street. Thank you, Rebecca. I'm noticing I'm feeling right now in my sense of time and perception of reality. You know, of course, we have the Gregorian calendar where we have 12 months and guns. We have a certain set amount of shows every year. But we can keep track of the passage of time with months and weeks and you get to September and you go, oh my gosh, what happened? This whole year just flew by.
In addition to that, we have a sixth sense of time here and that is people's streaks. Yeah. I remember I like it was yesterday and it was probably January where Rebecca T was like just starting or she was like maybe 20 episodes in on a streak. She was one of the first people who had started a new streak in a long time and look at her now. She's on 62 episodes. My, my time flies, guns. Yeah. That's incredible. Speaking of which, we got some people came in under the $7.77 amount. So we think them on Wednesdays. Usually it's people keeping streaks going. And that's why we got producer Monica keeping her street going 31 episodes in a row. Monica, thank you. Dim, Dame Tinfoil Hat, Keeper of the Seeds, 243 episodes in a row. Yeah, she's on a streak. And Sir Casey the Shield Knight, 662 episodes in a row.
Sir Casey the Shield Knight. You're close to that 666 number streak. Yes, almost there. We're going to need, we're going to need a jingle or something for that. Thank you very much to our financial producers. I want to read a few text messages, okay? Because not every show has a 247 open text message receptacle for their producers, but we do. So if you haven't joined, join the Canary Cry Text Message Alert system. If you text the word Canary to 877 740 3226, you will start getting text messages from me a couple of times a week before we go live, just to remind you that we're going live. But you can text that number back with whatever you want. I read them all. We try to read as many on the show as we can and is applicable. I can't carry on a conversation with UVA text because it's very expensive, but I like to read so on the show. This is, I got a grabbed a few from the past few
episodes because we haven't read many in a long time here. But I want to shout out to 509. He says, hi guys, thinking of the reenchantment. Have you heard of a YouTube channel called the Magical Mystery Church? Recent program asks, quote, is the book of Enoch in initiation into the mysteries? She, Laura, who does the channel, uses a good documentation that makes a lot of sense in her making her points, especially in light of scriptures. Take a look if you're inclined. Please what you think. I went ahead and watched some of that video. I actually had maybe a half a dozen people send me this video. And it's, it's basically a concept that we have known for a long time. Friends of ours like Donnie discerned as well as many others where you're looking around. We're seeing everybody wake up, seeing everybody get in a nephelome, seeing everybody bump up. Yeah, that there's some kind of Donnie would call it like a false light deception where this seeming
explosion of interest of like deep biblical prophecy with just the twinge of a weird little twist seems to be an avenue for deception and Q as well, which included some considered Q to be an initiation into the new age. It's kind of a limited, limited hangout concept, revealing some truths, but ultimately for a greater agenda. Yeah. Yeah. And so this magical mystery church channel, which I thought was an interesting name. But made a video making the case that, you know, through government, you know, politicians, Tucker Carlson, suddenly everybody's super deep into Enoch that this was actually serving more as an initiation into sort of a cult thinking than it
was into biblical thinking, which was has always been the disclaimer about. Yeah, we've been saying that for a long time. Diving into the book of Enoch forever, right? Yeah. You want, you got to have the disclaimer of this is not canon. This is apocrypha. It was a part of the culture during the New Testament period, especially as when we see it referenced in Jude and other places. But yes, I think we're totally seeing this. I mean, or at least this is the danger that people get sort of initiated through maybe biblical language. Right. But it's a perfect time. Sort of a nostic mystery. It's a perfect time to deliver this op right now too, because there is that there was a little conservative revival. We can call it a cultural Christianity that has become prevalent. And so yeah, this is a great time to feed the itching ears. Some things that
prior generations may not have received as well in the moment of cultural and political upheaval. But now it's just great. It's like perfect time to lay it out there because you're going to get people that get lost in those rabbit holes, you know? And I think the beauty of our sort of, I don't know, mentorship or relationship with Dr. Michael Heiser was at least for me what I learned was to take something like Enoch and take the meat spit out the bones kind of thing where it's like, if it's not really helping us understand the Bible, it's really not important. You know, and it's all or nothing for a lot of people. And I think that's where people get caught in a trap, you know? It's like the baby out the bathwater or it's like, oh, if Enoch, if that part of Enoch is true, then it opens them up to much deeper. And all the parts of Enoch, yeah, exactly. It must be true. The sort of credibility laundering. Yes. Because Jude mentions it, then we should pay more attention
to it than maybe we should. Right. Thank you very much. I think this is something for everybody to be paying attention to. And if not for yourselves, for the people around you, then you're coming in contact with 559 says, hey, Basil, I'm doing sound for my church this morning. We just finished practice. And now I'm waiting for my wife to come so I can walk her in the kids across the street. Just wanted to say thank you for sharing that story about loving witches. That hit me so hard and convicted me actually. I really believe it was from the Lord. Even though I'm a reformed Christian, and as you know, that kind of stuff isn't common in our circles. I actually believe it and believe you. Thank you very much. 559. The fact that witches would recognize you loving on them and let you in. Wow. Thank you so much. May God keep planting seeds and watering those seeds in those witches lives. And they may come to know the Lord. Have a blessed day. Yes. Thank you very much. Appreciate that. Yeah. It's a little bit of a bummer. There's a little bit, a little concerned about the time
going by. I was supposed to sit down with Rod actually yesterday and really lay out a full thing to that testimony, but we had some other, there's some some cross problems with scheduling. But yeah, thank you very much. 559. And if you don't know what 559 is talking about, go listen to the last 10 episodes. 970 says, need prayers for a co-worker who is a coach of a girl's soccer team. Get that prey, doose or button ready. Yep. And just learned about a sensitive situation involving a minor and an assistant coach for the team. Yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah. Please pray for my co-worker as they navigate the responsibility of reporting and handling that situation. And especially for the player who has been exposed to a harmful situation, pray that they both receive the wisdom, protection, help and support they need. Goodness gracious. Call the pray dooser. Pray to seers. Let's set bow. That's right. Another way to produce the show, something we are all called to is being a
pray dooser. Okay, pray for the show, pray for the producers of the show. Of course, pray for us. But also when prayer requests come in like this, write it down, say a little prayer down for 970. Gosh, just the horrible situation that someone is now responsible for doing the right thing. And wow, that is obviously most horrific for the victim and the victim's families. But that's a difficult thing on basically the entire community. Yeah, I mean, yeah, the perpetrator obviously needs to get smacked in the face by the Holy Spirit. But gosh, that's just like a community shaking thing. So, yeah, prayer for strength and strategy for those who are responsible for reporting it and getting everything taken care of and wisdom, protection, help and support for everybody there. Thank you, 970. Yeah, thank you. Okay, 336 sent another prayer request. Okay, listen up. Here we go.
I moved downtown in my, oh, this was crazy. Okay, yeah, kind of along the lines of what we've been saying recently about the supernatural is going to start really puncturing everybody's lives here. 336 tells the story and moved downtown in my area with a friend after losing my home last year since being here. I'm walking around and seeing so many homeless people tormented. Not by drugs necessarily, but by spiritual entities. I had an encounter a few weeks ago with a homeless man. He was speaking in a really strange high pitched voice and asking bizarre questions, but would not let me pass and ended up trapping me in a space I could not safely leave. Thank you. While I waited on police, I sensed the Lord telling me to rebuke the spirit in the man. I told him I wasn't afraid of him and he couldn't hurt me because I have the power of Jesus in me. And by his name, I speak against that spirit dwelling in him. The man's voice and demeanor changed immediately. The spirit was coming in and out of him, taunting me. Then the more I could speak of
Jesus, the more normal the man would become. The police arrived and the man fell back into possession. So I know I was only protected and did not bind the spirit and did not set the man free from the spirit. The city has a very popular store downtown that openly sells witchcraft material with a coffee shop inside and has a table set up on the sidewalk with candles and incense burning in various objects that I walk past every day. I pray and grieve as I walk hearing the tormented and sometimes yelling or screaming people around me or a blocker to a way who are likely suffering from more than addiction. My request is that we pray for a reenchantment in the truth of the gospel of Jesus in the cities, large and small around the country. For me, I may have cut off the rest of the thing there. But yeah, another example of yes, just more and more of this sort of explicit outward practice of magic and supernatural and the the consequences thereof, not just the
practitioners of this, but the surrounding population, in this case the homeless living on the street where this stuff is present. Gosh, that's a scary situation, but it sounds like you knew exactly what to do there, 336. So yes, and again, this is going to start happening more and more to everybody listening and thank goodness that we know the truth and have the authority of Jesus in us both in these weird supernatural encounters like this, but also in the sort of spiritual authority of our regents as well. So praying for a 336 and everybody else out there. Yep, absolutely. So there you go. There's some text messages. Thank you very much everybody. Again, just text the word canary to 877-740-3226 to get on the list and send us crazy stuff. I'm being reminded in the chat by Liquid Bacon's here that he did send a speech pipe. I don't think we saw this before
the show did we? I haven't refreshed that in a while. Wip it and rip it real quick. I was just informed that so my son has a music class. I thought I was not taking him. Apparently I am. So that changes my exit time here quite substantially. So I see the Liquid Bacon's message. Should we play it? Let's play Liquid Bacon's speech pipe here. And just for everybody who knows, you can leave us a voicemail by going to canarycrynewstalk.com. You'll see a green tab on the right hand or the bottom side of the page. Click on that any device anytime, anywhere you can record a 90 second message for us. If you don't want us to read it on the show, tell us immediately because most likely we will hear it for the first time on the show and so tell us not to play it and we will stop it and let's do it later. All right, here's Liquid Bacon's. I think we have hungry boys. Since Liquid Bacon's, I just wanted to give more info about the
canarycry meetup in Boulder, Colorado on October 17th. The address or sorry, it's at the Catman Dew restaurant and it's all you can, it's a buffet, Indian food buffet. It's around 20 bucks. And let's see, the address is 1964. It's 28th Street Boulder, Colorado 80301. Some happen to the message. I'd still go and but I don't hear anything anymore. We lost them. Okay, please give more information there. But yes, there is a meetup, October 17th Boulder, Colorado at five at the Catman Dew restaurant. That's it. Okay. Have a good one. Oh no. Half of this message was some happenable. A bit of that message.
All right, but there you go. Boulder, Colorado, October 17th, five o'clock, Catman Dew restaurant. Yep, you find it. You can, I forget what a Z-Bail is, but we'll look at it all. Yeah, you gotta let me know about that so I can put it on the page. I don't think it's on the meetups page yet. Yeah, I made a note of it. Didn't make it through the pipeline here. All right. You there? I am here. I'm waiting for you. I think that's that. I think we're done. I think we're done with that. We should think some of your time. I think I got like 10 minutes, something like that. Oh, we got art. I know. We have art. Yeah. Okay. Let's do art. Let's do art. All right. So go to canarycry.art. If you want to produce a show with your art, it's always great to help us build the culture. What was my tagline for that? I can't even remember the tagline. This is I need my AI to remind me. Build the culture. Become the culture. Build the culture of the culture behind the community.
Yeah. Build the culture. Yeah. There you go. Look at us. Yep. Yep. Yep. And you can do so with your art. We have a couple pieces that we would like to share today. We're a little backed up on things here, but that's okay. We got Jones. Jones coming in the, we'll see here. The space between what exists and what is observed. It's like a graphic here going on. Do you want to try to explain? Yes. Yes. Some more artwork for us. I think you may have even yes. There you go. Yes. Some more artwork here. Very good. Jones. Yeah. Very interesting. Okay. That's now this is a little abstract. So we're going to find it. We've got an image and we've got a sketch drawing of a thinking human being. They've got their hand up by their chin. They're thinking very hard. There's one on the bottom and there's one on the top upside down coming down from the top. Okay.
So we got two thinking people. One regular coming up from the bottom. One coming from the top facing down. Two words are prominently displayed between them. Religion and relationship. The person on the ground is thinking, oh wow. This is a tough one, Jones. I'm trying to consider. I'm trying to consider. I understand. The long chassis is going to be hard to audio by only audio describe exactly the impact, the complexity, the thoroughness of what this is. But the person on the bottom is thinking, eh, not religion. It's more relationship for me. And then the person on the top is thinking, eh, not relationship. It's more religion for me. Now, I think previously he had sent this in and said it, I want to hear your guys'
analysis of this. I think I know what it is. I'm getting a bit of a as above so below. If you're thinking from the sort of occultie sort of ontology there, where of course for at least Protestant Christians, it's always hesitant, reticent to describe our relationship with Jesus as religion, religion being man seeking God and relationship being God seeking man. But the inverse of that would be the mindset of no, it's not relationship. I mean, with now with all this explosion of more traditional sort of Catholic or Eastern Orthodox, there's a lot of there's a lot of Protestant criticizers out there now who have a lot to say about the maybe like a man be panby or kind of ungrounded idea that it's just a relationship and not a
religion in their swinging too far the other way. Yeah, kind of sapping the importance of the historical continuity of the organized body of Christ throughout history and sort of infusing the word religion a little bit more with maybe some more respect, which has been I totally follow the logic on it. I think that there's a conversation for that as I get more and more insight into how Catholics and Eastern Orthodox kind of view themselves compared to Protestants. But that's my take on what's your take. I think you pretty much nailed it. I saw that as above so below as well. Yeah. But also maybe perhaps that what religion is trying to do is to connect what is in heaven, the actual heavenly setting and bring it down to earth, whereas from our point of
view, from the ground looking up towards heaven, we are seeking that relationship. So it's sort of two sides of the same coin. But it's not that one is better than the other necessarily, but the problem that we fall into in our fallen nature is that we prefer one and throw out the other, whereas it's sort of a synthesis of both if you can find the the the negative truth within all of it that will actually find our path to God or something. Yeah, so I don't know very thought provoking. Yeah, I think you're very much better. You know, God's paused the show. Okay, emergency pause the show. All right, pause. Love or bug 91 on the YouTube chat. Thank you. They're they must not be like concurrent with the stream. Yeah, yeah, yeah, watching it earlier. And they made a comment. They gave a time code one hour 20 minutes, 10 seconds. They say, Jensen Huang's signature is giving Jim Henson the Muppets guy. And that is exactly correct. That is exactly what was in my
mind. I didn't I I could not think of it. But Jensen Huang has almost the exact signature of Jim Henson, the Muppets guy. Go check it out. I watch if you're anything like me and you watch the Muppets Christmas Carol every Christmas and some July's then you're going to recognize the Jim Henson signature immediately. Interestingly enough his name is Jensen. Yeah. And Jim Henson is Jensen Huang named after Jim Henson. I think it might be possible. I don't know. I just found it. Jim Henson's signature. I mean, yeah, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, there's a graphic. Are you talking about like the like the in the beginning of a the movies and stuff like the they do an intro Jim Henson has an intro of his signature on at least some of the Muppets like the magical pen is writing his signature kind of thing. Yes. Okay. Right. Yeah. That's it. Okay. Thank you. Leverbug 91. You're not going to hear this for another 40 minutes.
But when you do, I hope you know that we are grateful. All right. We had another piece of art. Yes, we did. This one is from Sir Darren. Night of the Harry pandas, which let's see. Sir Darren. This is the better one. Oh, the better one. He said to this is the better one. This is the one. Yeah. This is excellent. Sir Darren continues to creatively explore the Canary Cry lifestyle brand. And as we near episode 1000, the team is hard at work, petitioning to see what God wants us to do from maybe something very cool. But here we've got the space basil bomber jacket here.
Basilware. You've got an excellent AI version of me there wearing a silver space suit. I've got. Now, this is great. This is a great idea. Okay. Because the jacket, obviously, a nice reflection of the, uh, volunteer jacket, right? But it's our own thing. It's got a very space core. You got CCNT. You got T arm, not exactly to the right stuff. TRS. Very good. Think outside the cage. Got the patch, the Canary Cry space patches are coming. Yeah, that's tough. Patches. Well, here's the thing. Okay. Think about it for the lifestyle brand. We have maybe two to three dozen patches that have been designed by Sir Dove and Sir Darren over the years, because we were, we were playing around with the idea of doing merit badges, right, for producers and participating in different ways. You get different merit badges.
So we've got a whole collection of already designed patches. And to do a Canary Cry, you know, episode 1000 jacket, where you, you know, it'll come with some dope patches. We've got the Basil Wifeo Core patch, the Charlie Charlie November Tango patch, and of course, the CCNT logo. But something like this where producers could a get the jacket, but then collect more patches to put on the jacket. Oh my gosh. Really? Now, this is not just style. Okay, it is style, but this is function. Yeah. Because when society collapses, you're going to be able to keep warm, but you're also going to be able to signal to all the other apocalypse survivors around you, like just how connected you are to, yeah, informed a, but also connected with a worldwide network
of other informed people. And that you will be a good member of their apocalypse team, right? This is a signifier that you'll be valuable member. And somebody will let you into their, you know, bunker, they'll share their food with you. You can share your knowledge with them. This is a survival jacket. I love this. This needs to have a good, thank you, sir. We need, yes, we need a, we need this. I need one. We're working on it. We're seeing what comes. We are rapidly approaching episode 1000. Every time we blink, we get close. But all in the Lord's timing. Thank you, sir, Darren. Thank you, sir, Darren. Yes. I hope this comes to life. We're able to, we got to, we got to be careful, God's because we can get carried away. We can get carried away. We don't know what God has in store for us, but this is the next step towards towards something. Something is definitely going to happen. Yeah. All right. Thank you, sir,
Darren. Okay. I'm pretty much out of time, Basil. I, I, it's been with us the last couple episodes. What I was going to do was talk about science focus.com saying the moon might soon host the craziest experiment in human history, which is that they're going to have a large hadron collider on the moon. Yeah, that's perfect. Yeah. So we can, it's really open up a portal. Oh, you just hit the portal. Switzerland and the moon. Yeah. So we can travel. We don't need spaceships. We don't need elevators. We can just use the portal created by the large hadron collider. Yeah. That's good. Well, I'm glad that actually we got our Bible time earlier in the show. Yeah. That's good. I mean, I was going to talk a little bit about Jacob's ladder. John one, talking about Jesus, you know, ascending to heaven and then Genesis 28, of course, the Jacob's ladder and how there's a spy here that talks about in verse 17 and he was afraid and said,
how awesome is this place? This is none other than the house of God. This is the gate of heaven. Interesting. The gate of heaven. And then let's see. What other spots was I was going to talk about? Second Kings 2 where Elijah has taken up to heaven in a whirlwind, Obadaya, verses 3 and 4, where he talks about soaring like an eagle, but then God is going to bring you down, even if you're nest among the stars, some of the old classics of living, I guess, up there on the ferment or whatever, you know, or beyond the ferment for some. So I was going to do all that, but instead, I've got to take my kid to music class because I need a son that is competent musically, you know, it just needs to happen. So there you go. Yeah, sure. I mean, in the age of Si, there's very few things that will be more important than humans being able to play music. Yeah. Real quick, I do want to
show something that 337 texted to the Canary of Christ text message alert system. I'm going to take your thing off the stage. I'm going to put my thing here. And this is Greg Brockman, the anti Christ Paul savior, air and sciat technological God control through intelligence. We've got just a magnificent AI anti Christ piece of art here. We've got the Tower of Babel with the chat GPT logo on it, flaming in the distance. We've got dystopian skyscrapers and sitting on his throne of evil with the yeah, this is Palo Alto, California, where the throne of the anti Christ Greg Brockman is seated. You've got the hordes and drones of Palo Alto, you know, occultists bowing to the anti Christ Greg Brockman. He is the size of a building and they're all
very tiny. So he does, you know, this is powerful. He's in sort of Roman style red and black robes. He's holding up his hand in the sort of classic as above so below hand gesture on his hand, of course, is branded the mark of the beast, the chat GPT logo there. He's wearing a crown with one, two, three, four, five, six, seven, eight, nine. I'm sure there's a tenth one on there. 10th crown 10th spike on his crown there too. Very good. Thank you very much. 330 super intelligence right there. Greg Brockman, you've avoided the eyes of the anti Christ watchers for too long. But that's the signature gave it away sir. Signalling your stick. Yeah, very good. Thank you. Whoops. How do we get back on stage here? There we go. I guess we're no perfect.
That all right. There we go. There we are. Thank you everybody for coming in being here live for the show. Thank you to the podcast listeners listening afterwards. God bless you guys and share the show. Share the like the like the show like the video. We don't say this often. Please like the video. Subscribe to the channels. Turn on notifications and share the show and whatever way makes sense to you. If the Greg Brockman signature really pushed this episode over the edge for you, send it out to all your your anti Christ hunters. That's this very important information for them. Share the show however you want. We call it rattling cages. All you got to do is walk right up to him and grab him by the cage. Grab him by the cage. I'm I'm realizing I didn't thank the other producer. So thank you to the time stampers. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yeah. You want me to actually okay. Hold on. Jade Bounds. You said more than anything. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you to
Tech team. Canary Kai Tech team. Thank you. Thank you. Jam Adam 42. Good join the telegram the discord channel. The canary cried dot community at canary cried dot party. Thank you to Joe for your feedback. Thank you to Sir Clank for everything you've ever done and Sir Ike. Yeah, for doing the same. There we go. Share the show. We call it rattling cages. All you got to do is walk right up to him and grab him by the cage and then you shake him. The world of current pretty much is a way to predict. No one has shittings up stir up some controversy. Rattles you cages. You can't stop that. Don't never silence me. I'm the last angry man. A crusader for the little guy. Leave the bird alone. Never. Rattles you cages. You can't do it. We're out of the UK. We're going to raise from that. Every opportunity to improve. Undistinguished? Ask Noah. That's right. Just ask Noah. After party on the discord. Ooh. Canary Kai Tech team. Canary cried dot party. You'll see the invite link for the discord there. After party on the discord. Guns of Gawney. Last words.
Congratulations. You have completed the month of September. We are in double-visit months for the year 2026 now. We're going into October. Q Q4 baby. Q4. You're for finishing strong and Q4 everybody. Yep. All right. I have to go make sure to be back. The plan is to do clubhouse tomorrow. So stay tuned for that. But we'll be back by Monday. All right. Everybody thanks for tuning in to this episode of the Canary Cry News Talk. Make sure to tune in again. But until then, thank you outside the cave.
Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Remember, reality is the evolution of the universe. The hologram by cold. Bye. Bye. Bye. Bye. Bye. I'm out of here. Bye. Value for value. We take no money from corporations, commies, or cartels. Canary cried dot support.
More episodes
More from Canary Cry News Talk

FAITH vs PARAFAITH: The WAR for SACRED SINGULARITY | CCNT 977
Canary Cry News Talk

Super Intelligence and the Fallen Angels of Ireland
Canary Cry News Talk

How ACTS teaches Christians to thrive in "Ai Ephesus", Human vs Robot Cage Match
Canary Cry News Talk

A Christian Q&A on The Supernatural Burning Man - Canary Cry Clubhouse
Canary Cry News Talk