Mega Edition: Jennifer Araoz And Her Allegations Made Against Jeffrey Epstein (Part 7-8) (3/6/26)

0:00The Toyota Tundra and Tacoma are built to keep going, blending rugged muscle with precision engineering, all supported by Toyota's time-tested legacy of dependability. Step into a Tundra and feel the unyielding capability with the available iForce Max engine Tundra puts out impressive power, torque, and towing performance and the roomy high-tech cabin keeps you connected on the go. Or take a look at Tacoma, made for drivers who push past the path, agile, tough and relentless with available features like crawl control, a portable JBL speaker, a power lift gate, so gear goes in fast and the adventure keeps moving. The Tacoma and Tundra are engineered to endure season after season, mile after mile. So drive one home today, visit toyota.com or stop by your local Toyota dealer to find out more Toyota, let's go places. What's up everyone and welcome back to the Epstein Chronicles. This episode we're picking back up where we left off with Jennifer Arrayos and her claims against Jeffrey Epstein and is a state.

1:02Part 7. Cause of Action 1. Sexual assault and battery against Darren Kaye and Dyke and Richard DeCon in their capacities as executors of the estate of Jeffrey Epstein, 195. Plaintiff incorporates by reference all preceding paragraphs and realleges them as if set forth fully herein, 196. Jeffrey Epstein made violent sexual demands on plaintiff while placing his hands on our body and committed repeated acts of harmful or offensive touching against plaintiff, 197. These demands were intended to intimidate plaintiff and forcer to submit to his sexual request, 198. As a direct and proximate result of Jeffrey Epstein's repeated sexual assaults and battery of the plaintiff, she has in the past, suffered and in the future will continue to suffer physical injury, pain, emotional distress, psychological trauma, mental anguish, humiliation, embarrassment, loss of self esteem, loss of dignity, invasion of her privacy and the loss of her capacity

2:06to enjoy life, as well as other damages including but not limited to dropping out of high school and giving up on her career of being an actress, model and a singer. Plaintiff incurred medical and psychological expenses and plaintiff will in the future suffer additional medical and psychological expenses. These injuries are permanent in nature and Plaintiff will continue to suffer these losses in the future. Cause of Action Number 2 Intentional inflection of emotional distress against Darren Kay Indyke and Richard D. Conn in their capacities as executors of the estate of Jeffrey Epstein, 199. Jeffery Epstein's outrageous and unconscionable conduct which violated all norms of decent and civil society was an intentional inflection of emotional distress upon plaintiff 201. As a direct and proximate result of Jeffrey Epstein's intentional inflection of emotional

3:11distress, the plaintiff has in the past suffered and in the future will continue to suffer physical injury, pain, emotional distress, psychological trauma, mental anguish, humiliation, embarrassment, loss of self esteem, loss of dignity, invasion of her privacy and a loss of her capacity to enjoy life, as well as other damages including but not limited to, dropping out of high school and giving up on her career of being an actress, model and singer. Defensive incurred medical and psychological expenses and plaintiff will in the future suffer additional medical and psychological expenses. These injuries are permanent in nature and plaintiff will continue to suffer these losses in the future. Cause of Action Number 3 Negligent inflection of emotional distress against Darren Kay Indyke and Richard D. Conn in their capacities as executors of the estate of Jeffrey Epstein, 202. The plaintiff incorporates by reference all proceeding paragraphs and realleges them as if set forth fully herein.

4:12203. By reason thereof, Jeffrey Epstein committed negligent inflection of emotional distress upon plaintiff, 204. As a direct and proximate result of Jeffrey Epstein's negligent inflection of emotional distress, the plaintiff has in the past suffered and in the future will continue to suffer physical injury, pain, emotional distress, psychological trauma, mental anguish, humiliation, embarrassment, loss of self-esteem, loss of dignity, invasion of her privacy, and the loss of her capacity to enjoy life, as well as other damages including but not limited to dropping out of high school and giving up on her career of being an actress, model and singer. Plaintiff incurred medical and psychological expenses and plaintiff will in the future suffer additional medical and psychological expenses. These injuries are permanent in nature and plaintiff will continue to suffer these losses in the future. Cause of action, number 4. Conspiracy to commit sexual assault and battery against Golan Maxwell, Leslie Groff,

5:17Simberli Aspinosa, the recruiter, the corporate defendants, and or the institutional defendants. 205. Plaintiff incorporates, by reference, all preceding paragraphs and re-elegism, as if set forth fully herein. 206. Miss Maxwell, Miss Groff, Miss Aspinosa, the recruiter, the corporate defendants, and or institutional defendants conspired with Jeffrey Epstein to commit repeated acts of sexual assault and harmful or offensive touching against plaintiff. 207. As the direct and proximate result of Miss Maxwell, Miss Groff, Miss Aspinosa, the recruiter, the corporate defendants, and or the institutional defendants conspiring with Jeffrey Epstein to commit repeated acts of sexual assault and battery against the plaintiff. She has in the past suffered, and in the future will continue to suffer physical injury, pain, emotional distress, psychological trauma, mental anguish, humiliation, embarrassment, loss of self-esteem, loss of dignity, invasion of her privacy, and the loss of her capacity

6:18to enjoy life, as well as other damages. 2. Dropping out of high school, and giving up on her career of being an actress, model, and singer, plaintiff incurred medical and psychological expenses, and plaintiff will in the future suffer additional medical and psychological expenses. These injuries are permanent in nature, and plaintiff will continue to suffer these losses in the future. 5. Conspiracy to commit intentional inflection of emotional distress against Groff, Miss Leslie Groff, Simberley Aspinosa, the recruiter, the corporate defendants, and or institutional defendants, 208. Plaintiff incorporates, by reference, all proceeding paragraphs, and re-electives them as if set forth fully herein, 209. Miss Maxwell, Miss Groff, Miss Aspinosa, the recruiter, the corporate defendants, and or the institutional defendants conspired with Jeffrey Epstein to commit outrageous and unconscionable conduct, which violated all norms of decent and civil society, and was

7:23an intentional inflection of emotional distress upon plaintiff. 2. 10. As a direct and proximate result of Miss Maxwell, Miss Groff, Miss Aspinosa, the recruiter, the corporate defendants, and or the institutional defendants conspiring with Jeffrey Epstein to commit intentional inflection of emotional distress, the plaintiff has in the past suffered, and in the future will continue to suffer, physical injury, pain, emotional distress, psychological trauma, mental anguish, humiliation, embarrassment, loss of self-esteem, loss of dignity, invasion of her privacy, and a loss for her capacity to enjoy life, as well as other damages, including, but not limited to, dropping out of high school, and giving up on her career of being an actress, model, and singer. Plaintiff incurred medical and psychological expenses, and plaintiff will in the future suffer additional medical and psychological expenses. These injuries are permanent in nature, and plaintiff will continue to suffer these losses

8:24in the future. 3. Conspiracy to commit negligent inflection of emotional distress against Elaine Maxwell, Simberli Aspinosa, Leslie Groff, the recruiter, the corporate defendants, and the institutional defendants. 2. Plaintiff incorporates, by reference, all preceding paragraphs, and realleges them as if set fourth fully herein. 2. 12. By reason thereof, Ms. Maxwell, Ms. Groff, Ms. Aspinosa, the recruiter, the corporate defendant, and or the institutional defendants, conspired with Jeffrey Epstein to commit negligent inflection of emotional distress upon plaintiff. 2. 13. As a direct and proximate result of Ms. Maxwell, Ms. Groff, Ms. Aspinosa, the recruiter, the corporate defendants, and or the institutional defendants conspiring with Jeffrey Epstein to commit negligent inflection of emotional distress, the plaintiff has in the past suffered, and in the future will continue to suffer physical injury, pain, emotional distress, psychological

9:26trauma, mental anguish, humiliation, embarrassment, loss of self-esteem, loss of dignity, invasion of our privacy, and the loss of our capacity to enjoy life. As well as other damages, including, but not limited to, dropping out of high school, and giving up on our career of being an actress, model, and singer, plaintiff, incurred medical and psychological expenses, and plaintiff will in the future suffer additional medical and psychological expenses. These injuries are permanent in nature, and plaintiff will continue to suffer these losses in the future. As of Action Number 7, Negligent Security Against 9E 71st Street Corporation, 214. Plaintiff incorporates, by reference, all preceding paragraphs, and realleges them as if set forth fully herein, 215. At all times relevant herein, Defendant 9E 71st Street Corporation, 9 East, was the lawful owner of the property located at 9E 71st Street, New York, New York.

10:28216. Defendant 9E was acquired, titled to the property on September 6, 1989, and retained such until the property was fraudulently transferred to Maple Incorporated on December 11, 2011. 2017. At all relevant herein, Defendant 9E maintained legal control over the subject premises. 218. Epstein was a regular habitant of Defendant 9E and in fact resided at the premises when he was present in New York, 2019. Defendant 9E's new or should have known when Jeffrey Epstein was in the home owned by Defendant 9E and when Jeffrey Epstein had young females, including minor females, such as plaintiff at the premises. 220. When plaintiff was sexually abused by Jeffrey Epstein in 2001 and 2002, Defendant 9E's as the owner of the property, where all of the sexual abuse of plaintiff occurred, had a duty to maintain the premises in a reasonably safe condition.

11:28221. Defendant 9E's had a duty to take care of precautions to protect guests, visitors, or invitees such as plaintiff from foreseeable harm, including foreseeable conduct, 222. Defendant 9E's had a duty to take reasonably precautionary measures to minimize the risk of sexual assaults upon visitors to the premises such as plaintiff. 223. Jeffrey Epstein's sexual assault and battery of plaintiff was foreseeable and no actions and or precautions were taken to prevent it. 224. Decide several examples before a plaintiff was ever lured by Epstein's recruiter to visit the premises owned by 9E's. A. Maria Farmer, who was responsible for manning the front door at his New York mansion and keeping records of people who came to the home, Ms. Farmer witnessed a number of school-aged girls coming to the house, some of the young girls would be wearing their school uniforms, who then would be escorted upstairs.

12:29C. Maria Farmer's deposition. While Ms. Farmer was told these young girls were interviewing for modeling positions, she testified under oath that it did not seem credible to her that these young girls were interviewing for modeling positions. B. Another one of Epstein's household employees, Mr. Alfredo Rodriguez, testified to seeing numerous underage girls coming into Epstein's mansion for purported massages. C. Alfredo Rodriguez, July 29, 2009 deposition at 242 through 44. Rodriguez was aware that sex toys and vibrators were found in Epstein's bedroom after the purported massages, ID at 223 through 28. Rodriguez thought that Epstein was doing was wrong, given the extreme youth of the girls that he saw. C. Want a Lessie Epstein's former house manager from 1991 to 2002, testified he saw probably over 100 girls serve Epstein at his mansion over 10 years. C.

13:30Want a Lessie's deposition dated September 8, 2009. In Jane Doe number 2, verse Jeffrey Epstein, case number 08-cb-90119, after each encounter, a Lessie testified, he would clean up the home upstairs, massage room. On multiple occasions, he said he found vibrators, her sex toys, and put them in defendant Maxwell's closet because he knew that's where they were kept. 225, nearly every day that Jeffrey Epstein was on or in the property of defendant 9 East, he was engaging in criminal sexual behavior and violation of Article 130, including every single encounter described herein with plaintiff. 226, defendant 9 East breached its duty to plaintiff by failing to take even minimal safety precautions to protect against the predictable criminal acts of Jeffrey Epstein, which were reasonably predictable and foreseeable to occur on the property. 227, defendant's 9 East negligence was a proximate cause of the sexual offenses committed against

14:32plaintiff and violation of Article 130, 228. As a direct and proximate result of defendant 9 East breached, the plaintiff has in the past suffered and in the future will continue to suffer physical injury, pain, emotional distress, psychological trauma, mental anguish, humiliation, embarrassment, loss of self-esteem, loss of dignity, invasion of her privacy, and a loss of her capacity to enjoy life, as well as other damages. Plaintiff incurred medical and psychological expenses and plaintiff will in the future suffer additional medical and psychological expenses. These injuries are permanent in nature and plaintiff will continue to suffer these losses in the future. Alright folks, we're going to wrap up right here and in the next episode we'll pick up where we left off with the cause of action number eight. All of the information that goes with this episode can be found in the description box. What's up everyone and welcome back to the Epstein Chronicles.

15:34We're going to pick back up where we left off with Jennifer Oreos and her claims against Jeffrey Epstein and Jeffrey Epstein's estate. So let's get right back to it. Cause of action number nine, negligence against NES LLC, 9 East 71st Street Corporation, Leslie Groff, Simberly Espinoza, Endor Daringay and Dijk and Richard Deacon in their capacities as executors of the estate of Jeffrey Epstein, 252. The plaintiff incorporates by reference all proceeding paragraphs and re-elegism as said fourth herein. 253, it is believed that each employee of defendant, NES LLC, NES, operated at the direction of Jeffrey Epstein, 9 East, New York Strategy Group, Miss Maxwell, Miss Espinoza and Miss Groff. 254, upon information and belief, the primary responsibility of each employee of defendant, NES was to fulfill the needs or requests of Jeffrey Epstein.

16:38More particularly, his daily massage schedule, 255, upon information and belief, the employees of defendant, NES were compensated primarily if not exclusively to procure or maintain each young female masseuse or to assist knowingly or unknowingly in the concealment of any misconduct committed against each masseuse. 256, upon information and belief, the employment responsibilities of the various employees of defendant, NES included but were not limited to one recruiting young females including minor children such as plaintiff to provide massages to creating Jeffrey Epstein's massage schedule, three maintaining Jeffrey Epstein's massage four escorting various young females into the massage room at the New York Mansion owned by defendant, 9 East, five maintaining contact with various young females who were recruited to the New York Mansion for the purposes of providing Jeffrey Epstein with massage, six providing compensation

17:42to each young masseuse upon the completion of our engagement with Jeffrey Epstein. 7, providing meals and food and other services to the young females in order to provide an air of legitimacy to the functions of the corporation. 8, providing hospitality services to the young females in order to provide an air of legitimacy to the functions of the corporation. 9, providing educational services. 10, providing medical services. 11, providing transportation services. 12, providing housing services, 13, providing various other enticements to ensure the continued operation of the various young female masseuses with defendant, NES, corporate objective. 14. Encouraging individuals including the females who were recruited to the house to provide a massage, to recruit other young females to engage in the same activity for Jeffrey Epstein, and 15. Coordinating together and with Jeffrey Epstein to convey a powerful and legitimate

18:43enterprise system capable of gaining cooperation from young females recruited for massages, often minors such as plaintiff, 257. In fulfilling their employment responsibilities, each employee voluntarily assumed the duty with respect to each young female recruited to massage Jeffrey Epstein, including plaintiff, 258. To fulfill said duty, each employee was required to perform their assumed duty carefully without omitting to do what an ordinarily prudent person would do in accomplishing the task, 259. The young females being recruited to engage in massages for Jeffrey Epstein were inexperienced in the art of massage, a fact that was known or should have been known to defendant, NES, and its employees and management in the exercise of reasonable care, 260. Plaintiff relied on defendants NES voluntary assumption of a duty as well as the voluntary assumption of each individual employee and manager to act with reasonable care towards her,

19:46261. In the exercise of reasonable care, defendant NES and its employees and managers further new or should have known of the dangerous propensities of Jeffrey Epstein and approximate harm that would be caused by his likely sexual misconduct and various violations of Article 130, 262. The failure of defendant NES and each of its respective employees and managers to act in the same manner as an ordinarily prudent person placed plaintiff in a more vulnerable position than if defendant NES and its employees and management had not assumed the obligation to treat her with reasonable care, 263. In breaching its duty, defendant NES, its employees and management launched the force or instrument of harm directed toward plaintiff. In doing so, defendant NES, its employees and management enhanced the risk plaintiff faced and caused her to forego any opportunity she may otherwise have had to avoid the risk inherent with being in a room alone with Jeffrey Epstein to perform a massage

20:50as an untrained minor child and in the case of Miss Oreos, someone who was not invited there to give massages. 264. Defendants NES, Jeffrey Epstein, 90s, New York Strategy Group, Miss Maxwell, Miss Espinosa, and Miss Groff, negligence was approximate cause of sexual offenses committed against plaintiff and violation of Article 130, 265. As a direct and approximate result of defendant NES, Jeffrey Epstein's 90s, New York Strategy Group, Miss Maxwell, Miss Espinosa, and Miss Groff's negligence, the plaintiff has in the past, suffered and in the future will continue to suffer physical injury, pain, emotional distress, psychological trauma, mental anguish, humiliation, embarrassment, loss of self-esteem, loss of dignity, invasion of privacy, and the loss of her capacity to enjoy life, as well as other damages. Plaintiff incurred medical and psychological expenses and plaintiff will in the future

21:50suffer additional medical and psychological expenses, these injuries are permanent, and plaintiff will continue to suffer these losses in the future. Causes of Action 10-13 Fraudulent conveyance against 90s, 71st Street, Corporation, and Maple Incorporated, 266. Plaintiff incorporates by reference, all proceeding paragraphs, and realleges them, as if set forth fully herein. 267. Defendants were engaged in a business or transaction, 268. At the time of the Fraudulent conveyance, plaintiff was a future creditor as defined under the New York debtor and creditor law, 269. Despite efforts by Jeffrey Epstein, his attorneys, and the New York prosecutor to lower his sexual offender status to be filed in New York on November 17, 2011, a New York appeals court, upheld a lower court's ruling that Epstein must register as New York's highest level sex offender. A level three status means high risk of repeat

22:54offense and a threat to public safety exists, according to the state's guidelines. 270. Just four business days after being ordered to register as New York's highest level sex offender and have regular 90-day check-ins as required by law, on November 23, 2011, in an order to shield himself and his property, owned by Nine East, located at Nine East 71st Street, where all of the crimes in the state occurred against Mrs. Oreos and so many other victims, from claims of current and future creditors, whose claims had not matured, Epstein, fraudulently transferred, title the property for Nine East to the Virgin Islands-based company Maple Incorporated, another company controlled by them. 271. The transfer documents list Epstein as President of both Nine East and Maple and show a mortgage of $0 and consideration paid of $10 for the transaction, despite the property being conservatively valued by Jeffrey Epstein's own admission at $55,931,000. 272. At the time of the fraudulent transfers,

24:02defendants were aware of current legal claims against Epstein and knew or reasonably should have known about plaintiffs' potential exposure to Mrs. Oreos for future legal claims. 273. At the time of fraudulent conveyance, plaintiffs' claims against Epstein had not matured. 274. The fraudulent transfers were effectuated for the express purpose of evading financial liability to current and future creditors, including plaintiff 275. Defendants by these fraudulent transfers intended to hinder the lay or the fraud, both present and future creditors, including plaintiff, from satisfying any judgment they may have had against the property, where all of the sexual crimes and violation of Article 130 of minors occurred 276. Defendants' fraudulent conveyances were made without fair consideration, despite the person making it, Jeffrey Epstein, being a defendant in actions for money judgments 277. The conveyances were fraudulent, as to the plaintiff as a future creditor, as defined under New York debtor creditor law 278.

25:09Plaintiff is therefore entitled to avoid the fraudulent transfers 279. Plaintiff is thereby entitled to attach or levy execution upon any property or assets that were fraudulently conveyed. 280. In addition, plaintiff is entitled to recover interest costs and disbursements of this action, including reasonable attorney fees pursuant to New York debtor and creditor law 281. Defendants have violated each of the following sections of New York debtor creditor law 273.A 276.276. A 279. Wherefore, plaintiff demands judgment against defendants as follows 1. On the first cause of action assessing compensatory damages and punitive damages in an amount to be determine that trial, 2. On the second cause of action, assessing compensatory damages and punitive damages in an amount to be determined at trial. On the third cause of action, assessing compensatory damages in an amount to be determined at trial. 4. On the fourth

26:14Aut Eller with Call of Action, Co.unitive Damages and an Amount to Beat Determined At Ooooh Ultimately 5. on the 5. Compumentatory and Punitive Damages An Amount to Beat Determined atrokes 6. On the 6. Compumentatory Unitive Damages but Actions Doors but Actions On the 7. Accomplendentory Punitive Damages An Amount to Beat Determined At приuhl 8. Accompled Compumentatory

27:44such other relief as the court deems just and proper. This document was signed by Daniel Kaiser and it was dated October 10, 2019. And this is going to wrap up Jennifer Oreos and her complaints against Jeffrey Epstein's estate. All of the information that goes with this episode can be found in the description box.