Skip to content
TrackPodcasts
newsMar 5, 202627:21

Mega Edition: Jennifer Araoz And Her Allegations Made Against Jeffrey Epstein (Part 7-9) (3/5/26)

Get every episode summarized

Each time Jeffrey Epstein: The Coverup Chronicles publishes, we email you a written briefing from the transcript — the topics, who appeared, and any specific claims, with the ad reads skipped.

Email me new episodes

Free for 3 shows. No card needed.

About this episode

Jennifer Araoz filed a lawsuit against the Epstein Estate, alleging she was groomed and sexually assaulted by Jeffrey Epstein when she was a teenager. The lawsuit claims that Araoz was recruited outside her New York City high school by Epstein’s associates, who promised career opportunities and financial support. Over time, Epstein allegedly coerced her into repeated sexual encounters, culminating in a rape at his Manhattan townhouse when she was just 15 years old. Araoz contends that Epstein’s vast network of accomplices played an active role in enabling the abuse by fostering an environment of manipulation and control.


The lawsuit not only targets Epstein’s estate but also implicates other individuals and entities that Araoz claims facilitated his criminal activities. Seeking both justice and compensation, Araoz’s suit is part of a broader legal effort by Epstein’s survivors to hold those connected to his network accountable. The case underscores the alleged systemic nature of Epstein’s operations, highlighting the complicity of those who worked with him to sustain his predatory behavior.

to contact me:

[email protected]



source:

Jeffrey Epstein ST-19-PB-80 Additional filings (003).pdf (vicourts.org)

Hosts & guests

Transcript ready

555 searchable segments. Every word is indexed and playable.

Mega Edition: Jennifer Araoz And Her Allegations Made Against Jeffrey Epstein (Part 7-9) (3/5/26)

Jeffrey Epstein: The Coverup Chronicles

0:00
27:21

Full transcript

Jeffrey Epstein: The Coverup Chronicles — Mega Edition: Jennifer Araoz And Her Allegations Made Against Jeffrey Epstein (Part 7-9) (3/5/26). Machine-transcribed; use the interactive transcript above to jump the player to any line.

Teleredic here from 2311 Racing. Game night's fun until someone spends five minutes lining up one shot. Chalk, breathe, reach-shock, still aiming. While they figure it out, I fire up Champa Casino. I can spin anywhere, anytime, and there's always a new social casino game every week. Spins happen way faster than that shot. Play now at ChampaCasino.com. Let's Chamba. Sponsored by Chamba Casino, no purchase necessary. VGW Group, Voidware Prohibited by Law, 21 Plus, Terms and Conditions Apply. What's up, everyone? And welcome back to the Epstein Chronicles. This episode we're picking back up where we left off with Jennifer Arraios and her claims against Jeffrey Epstein and his estate. Part 7, cause of action one. Sexual assault and battery against Darren Kaye and Dyke and Richard D. Conn in their capacities as executors of the estate of Jeffrey Epstein. 195, plaintiff incorporates, by reference,

all proceeding paragraphs and realleges them as if set forth fully herein. 196, Jeffrey Epstein made violent sexual demands on plaintiff while placing his hands on our body and committed repeated acts of harmful or offensive touching against plaintiff. 197, these demands were intended to intimidate plaintiff and forcer to submit to his sexual requests. 198, as a direct and proximate result of Jeffrey Epstein's repeated sexual assaults and battery of the plaintiff, she has in the past, suffered, and in the future will continue to suffer physical injury, pain, emotional distress, psychological trauma, mental anguish, humiliation, embarrassment, loss of self-esteem, loss of dignity, invasion of her privacy, and the loss of her capacity to enjoy life, as well as other damages including, but not limited to, dropping out of high school and giving up on her career of being an actress, model, and a singer. Plaintiff incurred medical and psychological expenses

and plaintiff will in the future suffer additional medical and psychological expenses. These injuries are permanent in nature and plaintiff will continue to suffer these losses in the future. Cause of action number two. Intentional and inflection of emotional distress against Darren Kaye and Dyke and Richard DeCon and their capacities as executors of the estate of Jeffrey Epstein, 199. Plaintiff incorporates, by reference, all proceeding paragraphs and realleges them as if set forth fully herein. 200. Jeffrey Epstein's outrageous and unconscionable conduct, which violated all norms of decent and civil society was an intentional inflection of emotional distress upon plaintiff, 201. As a direct and proximate result of Jeffrey Epstein's intentional inflection of emotional distress, the plaintiff has in the past suffered and in the future will continue to suffer physical injury, pain, emotional distress, psychological trauma,

mental anguish, humiliation, embarrassment, loss of self-esteem, loss of dignity, invasion of her privacy and a loss of her capacity to enjoy life, as well as other damages, including but not limited to, dropping out of high school and giving up on her career of being an actress, model, and singer. Plaintiff incurred medical and psychological expenses and plaintiff will in the future suffer additional medical and psychological expenses. These injuries are permanent in nature and plaintiff will continue to suffer these losses in the future. Cause of action, number three, negligent, infliction of emotional distress against Darren Kaye and Dyke and Richard DeCon and their capacities as executors of the U.S. State of Jeffrey Epstein, 202. Plaintiff incorporates, by reference, all proceeding paragraphs and realleges them as if set forth fully herein. 203, by reason thereof, Jeffrey Epstein committed negligent inflection of emotional distress upon plaintiff, 204.

As a direct and approximate result of Jeffrey Epstein's negligent inflection of emotional distress, the plaintiff has in the past suffered and in the future will continue to suffer physical injury, pain, emotional distress, psychological trauma, mental anguish, humiliation, embarrassment, loss of self-esteem, loss of dignity, invasion of her privacy, and the loss of her capacity to enjoy life as well as other damages including but not limited to, dropping out of high school and giving up on her career of being an actress, model, and singer. Plaintiff incurred medical and psychological expenses and plaintiff will in the future suffer additional medical and psychological expenses. These injuries are permanent in nature and plaintiff will continue to suffer these losses in the future. Cause of action, number four. Conspiracy to commit sexual assault and battery against Golan Maxwell, Leslie Groff, similarly as Bonoza, the recruiter, the corporate defendants, and or the institutional defendants.

205, plaintiff incorporates, by reference, all preceding paragraphs and realleges them as if set forth fully herein. 206, Miss Maxwell, Miss Groff, Miss Espinosa, the recruiter, the corporate defendants, and or institutional defendants, conspired with Jeffrey Epstein to commit repeated acts of sexual assault and harmful or offensive touching against plaintiff. 207, as the direct and proximate result of Miss Maxwell, Miss Groff, Miss Espinosa, the recruiter, the corporate defendants, and or the institutional defendants conspiring with Jeffrey Epstein to commit repeated acts of sexual assault and battery against the plaintiff. She has in the past suffered, and in the future, we'll continue to suffer physical injury, pain, emotional distress, psychological trauma, mental anguish, humiliation, embarrassment, loss of self-esteem, loss of dignity, invasion of her privacy, and the loss of her capacity to enjoy life, as well as other damages, including, but not limited to dropping out of high school,

and giving up on her career of being an actress, model and singer. plaintiff incurred medical and psychological expenses, and plaintiff will in the future, suffer additional medical and psychological expenses. These injuries are permanent in nature, and plaintiff will continue to suffer these losses in the future. Cause of action number five, conspiracy to commit intentional inflection of emotional distress against Golan Maxwell, Leslie Groff, Simberli Espinosa, the recruiter, the corporate defendants, and-or institutional defendants, 208. plaintiff incorporates, by reference, all proceeding paragraphs, and re-elections them as if set forth fully herein, 209. Miss Maxwell, Miss Groff, Miss Espinosa, the recruiter, the corporate defendants, and-or the institutional defendants, conspired with Jeffrey Epstein, to commit outrageous and unconscionable conduct, which violated all norms of decent and civil society, and was an intentional inflection, of emotional distress upon plaintiff, 210.

As a direct and proximate result of Miss Maxwell, Miss Groff, Miss Espinosa, the recruiter, the corporate defendants, and-or the institutional defendants, conspiring with Jeffrey Epstein, to commit intentional inflection of emotional distress, the plaintiff has in the past suffered, and in the future will continue to suffer, physical injury, pain, emotional distress, psychological trauma, mental anguish, humiliation, embarrassment, loss of self-esteem, loss of dignity, invasion of her privacy, and a loss for her capacity to enjoy life, as well as other damages, including, but not limited to, dropping out of high school, and giving up on her career, of being an actress, model, and singer. Plaintiff incurred medical and psychological expenses, and plaintiff will in the future, suffer additional medical and psychological expenses. These injuries are permanent in nature, and plaintiff will continue to suffer these losses, in the future. Cause of action, number six, conspiracy to commit negligent inflection,

of emotional distress, against Elaine Maxwell, similarly Aspinosa, Leslie Groff, the recruiter, the corporate defendants, and the institutional defendants, to 11, plaintiff incorporates, by reference, all preceding paragraphs, and re-alleges them as if set forth fully herein, to 12, by reason thereof, Miss Maxwell, Miss Groff, Miss Espinosa, the recruiter, the corporate defendant, and or the institutional defendants, conspired with Jeffrey Epstein, to commit negligent inflection, of emotional distress upon plaintiff. 213. As a direct and proximate result of Miss Maxwell, Miss Groff, Miss Espinosa, the recruiter, the corporate defendants, and or the institutional defendants, conspiring with Jeffrey Epstein, to commit negligent inflection of emotional distress, the plaintiff has in the past, suffered, and in the future will continue to suffer, physical injury, pain, emotional distress, psychological trauma, mental anguish, humiliation, embarrassment, loss of self-esteem,

loss of dignity, invasion of our privacy, and the loss of our capacity to enjoy life, as well as other damages, including, but not limited to, dropping out of high school, and giving up on our career, of being an actress, model, and singer. Plaintiff, incurred medical and psychological expenses, and plaintiff will in the future, suffer additional medical and psychological expenses, these injuries are permanent in nature, and plaintiff will continue to suffer, these losses, in the future. Cause of action, number seven, negligent security against 90, 71st Street Corporation, 214. Plaintiff incorporates, by reference, all proceeding paragraphs, and realleges them, as if set forth fully, herein, 215. At all times relevant, herein, defendant 90, 71st Street Corporation, 90st, was the lawful owner of the property, located at 90, 71st Street, New York, New York. 216. Defendant 90st was acquired,

titled to the property on September 6, 1989, and retained, such until, the property was fraudulently transferred to Maple Incorporated on December 11, 2011. 2017. At all relevant, herein, defendant 90st maintained legal control, over the subject premises, 218. Epstein was a regular habitant of defendant 90st, and in fact resided at the premises, when he was present in New York, 219. Defendant 90st knew, or should have known, when Jeffrey Epstein was in the home, owned by defendant 90st, and when Jeffrey Epstein had young females, including minor females, such as plaintiff, at the premises. Drew McIntyre here from WWE. Wheeled in the claymore can be a life of chaos. When I'm not dominating in the ring, Chumba Casino is how this warrior takes a rebrate. With hundreds of online social games and new weekly releases, there's always something fresh to try. And those daily boosts, next level, even my free time feels like foul-hound.

So when life feels like a battle, kick up your feet, have some fun, and let's Chumba. No purchase necessary, VGW Group, void were prohibited by law, CTs and Cs, 21 plus sponsored by Chumba Casino. 220, when plaintiff was sexually abused by Jeffrey Epstein in 2001 and 2002, defendant 90st as the owner of the property, where all of the sexual abuse of plaintiff occurred, had a duty to maintain the premises in a reasonably safe condition. 221, defendant 90st had a duty to take care of precautions to protect guests, visitors, or invitees, such as plaintiff, from foreseeable harm, including foreseeable conduct, 222. Defendant 90st had a duty to take reasonably precautionary measures to minimize the risk of sexual assaults upon visitors to the premises, such as plaintiff. 223, Jeffrey Epstein's sexual assault and battery of plaintiff was foreseeable and no actions and or precautions were taken to prevent it.

224, to cite several examples, before plaintiff was ever lured by Epstein's recruiter to visit the premises owned by Nine East. A, Maria Farmer, who was responsible for manning the front door at his New York mansion and keeping records of people who came to the home, Miss Farmer witnessed a number of school-aged girls coming to the house, some of the young girls would be wearing their school uniforms, who then would be escorted upstairs, see Maria Farmer's deposition. While Miss Farmer was told these young girls were interviewing for modeling positions, she testified under oath that it did not seem credible to her that these young girls were interviewing for modeling positions. B, another one of Epstein's household employees, Mr. Alfredo Rodriguez, testified to seeing numerous underage girls coming into Epstein's mansion for purported massages. See Alfredo Rodriguez, July 29th, 2009 deposition at 242 through 44. Rodriguez was aware that sex toys and vibrators

were found in Epstein's bedroom after the purported massages, ID at 223 through 28. Rodriguez thought that Epstein was doing was wrong, given the extreme youth of the girls that he saw. See, Juan Alessi Epstein's former house manager from 1991 to 2002, testified he saw probably over 100 girls serve Epstein at his mansion over 10 years. See Juan Alessi's deposition dated September 8th, 2009. In Jane Doe number two, verse Jeffrey Epstein, case number zero eight, dash CB, dash nine zero, one one nine, after each encounter, Alessi testified he would clean up the home upstairs, massage room. On multiple occasions, he said he found vibrators or sex toys and put them in defendant Maxwell's closet because he knew that's where they were kept. 225, nearly every day that Jeffrey Epstein was on or in the property of defendant nine East. He was engaging in criminal sexual behavior and violation of article 130,

including every single encounter described herein with plaintiff. 226, defendant nine East breached its duty to plaintiff by failing to take even minimal safety precautions to protect against the predictable criminal acts of Jeffrey Epstein, which were reasonably predictable and foreseeable to occur on the property. 227, defendant's nine East negligence was approximate cause of the sexual offenses committed against plaintiff and violation of article 130. 228, as a direct and proximate result of defendant nine East breached the plaintiff has in the past suffered and in the future will continue to suffer physical injury, pain, emotional distress, psychological trauma, mental anguish, humiliation, embarrassment, loss of self-esteem, loss of dignity, invasion of her privacy, and a loss of her capacity to enjoy life, as well as other damages. Plaintiff incurred medical and psychological expenses and plaintiff will in the future suffer additional medical

and psychological expenses. These injuries are permanent in nature and plaintiff will continue to suffer these losses in the future. All right folks, we're gonna wrap up right here and in the next episode we'll pick up where we left off with the cause of action number eight. All of the information that goes with this episode can be found in the description box. What's up everyone and welcome back to the Epstein Chronicles. This episode we're gonna pick back up where we left off with Jennifer Oreos and her claims against Jeffrey Epstein and Jeffrey Epstein's estate. So let's get right back to it. Cause of action number nine, negligence against NES LLC, nine East 71st Street Corporation, Leslie Groff, Simberly Espinoza, and or Darren Kay Indyke and Richard Deacon in their capacities as executors of the estate of Jeffrey Epstein, 252. The plaintiff incorporates by reference

all proceeding paragraphs and re-elegism as said fourth, herein. 253, it is believed that each employee of defendant, NES LLC, NES, operated at the direction of Jeffrey Epstein, nine East, New York Strategy Group, Miss Maxwell, Miss Espinoza, and Miss Groff. 254, upon information and belief, the primary responsibility of each employee of defendant, NES, was to fulfill the needs or requests of Jeffrey Epstein. More particularly, his daily massage schedule, 255. Upon information and belief, the employees of defendant, NES, were compensated primarily, if not exclusively to procure or maintain each young female masseuse or to assist knowingly or unknowingly in the concealment of any misconduct committed against each masseuse, 256. Upon information and belief, the employment responsibilities of the various employees of defendant, NES, included, but were not limited to,

one, recruiting young females, including minor children, such as plaintiff, to provide massages, two, creating Jeffrey Epstein's massage schedule, three, maintaining Jeffrey Epstein's massage schedule, four, escorting various young females into the massage room at the New York mansion, owned by defendant, nine East, five, maintaining contact with various young females who were recruited to the New York mansion for the purposes of providing Jeffrey Epstein with massage, six, providing compensation to each young masseuse upon the completion of her engagement with Jeffrey Epstein. Seven, providing meals and food and other services to the young females in order to provide an air of legitimacy to the functions of the corporation. Eight, providing hospitality services to the young females in order to provide an air of legitimacy to the functions of the corporation. Nine, providing educational services. Ten, providing medical services. Eleven, providing transportation services.

Twelve, providing housing services. 13, providing various other enticements to ensure the continued operation of the various young female masseuses with defendant, NES, corporate objective, 14, encouraging individuals including the females who were recruited to the house to provide a massage, to recruit other young females to engage in the same activity for Jeffrey Epstein and 15, coordinating together and with Jeffrey Epstein to convey a powerful and legitimate enterprise system capable of gaining cooperation from young females recruited for massages, often minors, such as plaintiff, 257. In fulfilling their employment responsibilities, each employee voluntarily assumed a duty with respect to each young female recruited to massage Jeffrey Epstein, including plaintiff, 258. To fulfill that duty, each employee was required to perform their assumed duty carefully without a meeting to do what an ordinarily prudent person would do in accomplishing the

task, 259. The young females being recruited to engage in massages for Jeffrey Epstein were inexperienced in the art of massage, a fact that was known or should have been known to defendant, NES, and its employees and management in the exercise of reasonable care, 260. Plaintiff relied on defendants NES voluntary assumption of a duty as well as the voluntary assumption of each individual employee and manager to act with reasonable care towards her, 261. In the exercise of reasonable care, defendant NES and its employees and managers further knew or should have known of the dangerous propensities of Jeffrey Epstein and the proximate harm that would be caused by his likely sexual misconduct and various violations of Article 130, 262. The failure of defendant NES and each of its respective employees and managers to act in the same manner as an ordinarily prudent person plays plaintiff in a more vulnerable position

than if defendant NES and its employees and management had not assumed the obligation to treat her with reasonable care, 263. In breaching its duty, defendant NES, its employees and management launched a force or instrument of harm directed toward plaintiff, in doing so defendant NES, its employees and management, enhanced the risk plaintiff faced and caused her to forego any opportunity she may otherwise have had to avoid the risk inherent with being in a room alone with Jeffrey Epstein to perform a massage as an untrained minor child and in the case of Miss Arreos, someone who was not invited there to give massages 264. Against NES, Jeffrey Epstein, Nine East, New York Strategy Group, Miss Maxwell, Miss Espinoza and Miss Groff, negligence was a proximate cause of sexual offenses committed against plaintiff and violation of Article 130, 265. As a direct and proximate result of defendant NES, Jeffrey Epstein's Nine East, New York

Strategy Group, Miss Maxwell, Miss Espinoza and Miss Groff's negligence, the plaintiff has in the past, suffered and in the future will continue to suffer physical injury, pain, emotional distress, psychological trauma, mental anguish, humiliation, embarrassment, loss of self-esteem, loss of dignity, invasion of her privacy and a loss of her capacity to enjoy life, as well as other damages. Plaintiff incurred medical and psychological expenses and plaintiff will in the future suffer additional medical and psychological expenses, these injuries are permanent and plaintiff will continue to suffer these losses in the future. Tyler Reddick here from 2311 Racing, another checkered flag for the books, time to celebrate with Chamba. Jump in at chambacasino.com, let's chamba. No purchase necessary, VTW Group, boy, we're prohibited by law, CCNC, 21 plus sponsored by Chamba Casino. Costs of action, 10 through 13.

Fraudulent conveyance against 90, 71st Street, Corporation and Maple Incorporated, 266. Plaintiff incorporates by reference, all proceeding paragraphs and re-alleges them as if set 4th fully herein. 267. Defendants were engaged in a business or transaction, 268. At the time of the Fraudulent conveyance, plaintiff was a future creditor as defined under the New York debtor and creditor law, 269. Despite efforts by Jeffrey Epstein, his attorneys, and the New York prosecutor to lower his sexual offender status to be filed in New York on November 17, 2011, a New York appeals court upheld a lower court's ruling that Epstein must register as New York's highest level sex offender. A level 3 status means high risk of repeat offense and a threat to public safety exists according to the state's guidelines. 270. Just 4 business days after being ordered to register as New York's highest level sex offender and have regular 90-day check-ins as required by law, on November 23, 2011, in an order

to shield himself and his property, owned by 9 East, located at 9 East 71st Street, where all of the crimes in the state occurred against Mrs. Oreos and so many other victims, from claims of current and future creditors, whose claims had not matured, Epstein, fraudulently transferred, titled the property for 9 East of the Virgin Islands-based company Maple Incorporated, another company controlled by them. 271. The transfer documents list Epstein as president of both 9 East and Maple and show a mortgage of $0 and consideration paid of $10 for the transaction, despite the property being conservatively valued by Jeffrey Epstein's own admission at $55,931,272, at the time of the fraudulent transfers, defendants were aware of current legal claims against Epstein and knew or reasonably should have known about plaintiffs' potential exposure to Mrs. Oreos for future legal

claims. 273. At the time of fraudulent conveyance, plaintiffs' claims against Epstein had not matured. 274. The fraudulent transfers were effectuated for the express purpose of evading financial liability to current and future creditors, including plaintiff 275. Defendants by these fraudulent transfers intended to hinder the lay or the fraud, both present and future creditors, including plaintiff, from satisfying any judgment they may have had against the property where all of the sexual crimes and violation of Article 130 of minors occurred. 276. Those fraudulent conveyances were made without fair consideration, despite the person making it, Jeffrey Epstein, being a defendant in actions for money judgments, 277. The conveyances were fraudulent, as to the plaintiff as a future creditor, as defined under New York debtor creditor law, 278. Plaintiff is therefore entitled to avoid the fraudulent transfers 279.

Defendants is thereby entitled to attach or levy execution upon any property or assets that were fraudulently conveyed 288. In addition, plaintiff is entitled to recover interest costs and disbursements of this action, including reasonable attorney fees pursuant to New York debtor and creditor law 281. Defendants have violated each of the following sections of New York debtor creditor law 273 A 276 276 A and 279. Wherefore plaintiff demands judgment against defendants as follows 1. On the first cause of action, assessing compensatory damages and punitive damages in an amount to be determined at trial 2. On the second cause of action, assessing compensatory damages and punitive damages in an amount to be determined at trial. On the third cause of action, assessing compensatory damages in an amount to be determined at trial 4. On the fourth cause of action, compensatory and punitive damages in an amount to be determined

at trial 5. On the fifth cause of action, compensatory and punitive damages in an amount to be determined at trial 6. On the sixth cause of action, compensatory and punitive damages in an amount to be determined at trial 7. On the seventh cause of action, compensatory and punitive damages in an amount to be determined at trial. 8. On the eighth cause of action, compensatory and punitive damages in an amount to be determined at trial. 9. On the ninth cause of action, compensatory and punitive damages in an amount to be determined at trial. On the tenth cause of action, compensatory damages to be determined at trial. On the 11th cause of action, compensatory damages to be determined at trial. On the 12th cause of action, compensatory damages to be determined at trial. On the 13th cause of action, compensatory damages to be determined at trial. On the 14th cause of action, compensatory damages to be determined at trial.

On the 15th cause of action, compensatory damages to be determined at trial. the 16th cause of action, compensatory damages to be determined that trial on 17 cause of action, compensatory damages to be determined that trial number 18 for a court order, avoiding any and all fraudulent conveyances number 19 attorney fees and interest and disbursements and number 20 for such other relief as the court teams just and proper. This document was signed by Daniel Kaiser and it was dated October 10th, 2019 and this is going to wrap up Jennifer Oreos and her complaints against Jeffrey Epstein's estate. All of the information that goes with this episode can be found in the description box. Tyler Reddick here from 2311 Racing, Victory Lane, yeah, it's even better with Chumba by my side. Race to ChumbaCasino.com, let's Chumba. No purchase necessary, VTW Group, void work prohibited by law, CTNCs, 21 plus, sponsored

by Chumba Casino, no purchase necessary, VTW Group, void work prohibited by law, CTNCs, 21 plus, sponsored by Chumba Casino, no purchase necessary, VTW Group, void work prohibited by law,

More episodes

More from Jeffrey Epstein: The Coverup Chronicles

View all episodes →