
Hijacking False Flag!? Right As Netanyahu Predicts New Attacks On Israelis, America Leaves Iraq
Get every episode summarized
Each time Redacted News publishes, we email you a written briefing from the transcript — the topics, who appeared, and any specific claims, with the ad reads skipped.
Email me new episodesFree for 3 shows. No card needed.
About this episode
Redacted News is made possible by:
“When you're shopping for mattresses, you can spend hours reading reviews and scrolling through photos, but the only way to truly know if a mattress is right for you is to feel it for yourself. That's why Avocado invites you to come lie down.”From the transcript
Get every episode summarized
Each time Redacted News publishes, we email you a written briefing from the transcript — the topics, who appeared, and any specific claims, with the ad reads skipped.
Email me new episodesFree for 3 shows. No card needed.
Transcript ready
1,495 searchable segments. Every word is indexed and playable.
Full transcript
Redacted News — Hijacking False Flag!? Right As Netanyahu Predicts New Attacks On Israelis, America Leaves Iraq. Machine-transcribed; use the interactive transcript above to jump the player to any line.
This message is brought to you by Avocado mattress, and if healthy, comfortable sleep matters to you, this is one organic brand worth knowing. When you're shopping for mattresses, you can spend hours reading reviews and scrolling through photos, but the only way to truly know if a mattress is right for you is to feel it for yourself. That's why Avocado invites you to come lie down. Every Avocado mattress is got certified organic, assembled in our California facility with organic cotton wool and latex. No polyurethane foams, no fiberglass, certified by Made Safe and EWG Verified. It's a difference you can feel. So curl up, try any of our Avocado mattresses in person at an Avocado mattress store or 600 premier retail locations nationwide. Find out which of our five comfort levels is right for you because buying a mattress shouldn't be a guessing game. And there's no one size fits all when it comes to better sleep. Find your comfort, come lie down at Avocado. Visit AvocadoGreenMatrus.com to find a store near you. That's AvocadoGreenMatrus.com. Welcome everybody to redacted on this Wednesday.
I'm Clayton Morris on this show. We help you navigate the false flags and propaganda and government narratives that are piling up quicker than we can swap them away. We've got a couple of big ones today to go over. The CIA admitting or through documents in the mainstream media finally admitting that yes, in fact, weather manipulation, cloud seating, government programs all exist. We're also finally pulling out of Iraq after 23 years. It's hard to believe, 23 years. And of course, Neocons are not happy about this and one man in particular is not very happy about that. Also, the very latest on this hijacking and the convenient story that's now unfolding over the skies of Saudi Arabia, something very strange is happening. We're gonna unpack the very latest of this and these Israeli passengers, this flight bound for Israel thank goodness that there were strong Israelis
who knew how to fly, who could jump in at a moment's notice and who were able to take over this aircraft, land it safely, where there was immediately a press conference being held with Benjamin Netanyahu. Cameras were there. I'm sorry. I just, I'm sorry. Like they, maybe they, maybe we are stupid and maybe they think we're stupid and maybe we actually are stupid because you know Fox News wall to wall coverage of it. So I guess they think their viewers are pretty darn dumb. CNN says it wasn't a hijacking. So what in the world is going on? We're gonna unpack this all today. It's just stop me if you've heard these types of stories before, hey, it is community Wednesday. So you got me solo today, Natalie is off but thanks for everyone who is hanging out with us live. Today, the thousands of you across our different platforms, whether you're watching us on X on rumble on YouTube, drop some comments in the chat room and we will try to get there on the screen
for you as the show unfolds. We got a lot of great guests for you on the show today. So I do not want to dilly dally with chit chat and wasted air. We've got to get to it and bring you up to speed. So something very strange is happening in Europe right now and if you haven't been following that side of the story because there's a couple of stories kind of converging at the moment, here's what you need to know. Over the past several weeks, European governments have been warning about Russian drones, sabotage, incursions into NATO territory. Never forget, like, or just put aside, I guess Operation Gladio and all of these NATO stay behind armies that are still in place and can carry out all of these false flag attacks, but ignore those. So extraordinary new claims from the US side that warn that Russia would secretly place drones aboard commercial ships in the Mediterranean, launch them against Spain, France, or Italy, right to which Russia says, no, that's not going to happen.
I mean, what they're going to, they can also attack the Eiffel Tower next. Sure, okay. Well, they also have a conventional Navy. Why, why, why would you do that? Could you try that? Or could you put them on old dinghies and push them into the water? Right, okay. And it's all going to happen around potential like European upcoming elections. So Russia really wants to involve itself in disrupting European elections with drone attacks, hitting Spain, hitting European countries. Okay, sure. Then yesterday, war criminal in chief himself, Benjamin Netanyahu comes out and warns that he's been warned, that there are indications that right before the Israeli elections, our enemies will try to attack us, don't mess with us because the long arm of Israel will reach anywhere and we will destroy you. This was his warning yesterday. I don't know how to do that. I don't know how to do that. Don't worry. There are some people who have a lot of problems, they have to be able to do it.
So, I'm sure that you're going to have a lot of the military in the Mediterranean, I'm going to have a lot of problems. Okay. So stop me if you've heard this BS before. If there's one thing, Bibbi loves its canceling elections, of course, then my clockwork, a hijacking unfolds. Like less than, I don't know, 12 hours later, after that video is released, in which Israel says a failed terror attack happened against Israelis, a plain full of Israelis heading to Israel. This fly Dubai flight from Dubai to Tel Aviv, early this year, this fly Dubai flight from Dubai to Tel Aviv, early this morning, a plane filled with Israelis, transmitted an emergency hijacking message, then hijack codes, confirming a hijacking, and it suddenly dropped thousands of feet in minutes. Then it diverted to Boogh Saudi Arabia. Early reports say that there was a Ukrainian copilot, allegedly stabbed a Russian pilot mid flight. That's since, not, that's been debunk since. The cockpit turned into a struggle.
Now we know the stab pilot was an Indian national, based in Dubai, his copilot stabbed him, there he is. He apparently, according to reports, amends to open the cockpit door, and then just like, you know, a miracle unfolded as this cockpit door was now unfolded, some strong Israelis, happy to be on the flight, stormed the cockpit, subdued the stabber, grabbed him, put him in a chokehold, he's still alive and being questioned. Two of the Israelis happened to be pilots. So amends is really convenient. They managed to bring the plane down safely, and thank God Netanyahu was waiting there, ready to hold a press conference to bring us all up to speed about these heroes and how Israel could have lost this flight, listen. It is ends of Israel. This morning, there was an extremely serious security incidents on the flight from Dubai to Israel.
Nearly all the passengers on the flight were Israelis. During the flight, as they were approaching Israel, one of the pilots stabbed the other pilot and apparently tried to crush the plane with everyone on board. I spoke with one of the Israeli passengers. He told me the plane went into a spin and began to dive. He told me that against all odds, he managed to break into the cockpit together with one of the crew members and together, they subdued the pilot who carried out the stabbing as he was trying to sabotage the aircraft systems. Additional air crew who were on board entered the cockpit and managed to stabilize the plane. I salute these heroes who showed exceptional resourcefulness and courage. They saved many lives. They prevented a terrible disaster. The plane landed safely at the book airport in Saudi Arabia. All the passengers are out of danger.
The pilot who carried out the stabbing has been detained and is being questioned by Saudi authorities at this hour. And as people in the chat room are saying, against all odds, against all odds, where's Phil Collins when you need him? So hours before this all happened though, Iranian media reported that intelligence, reported intelligence that Israel was planning an aviation attack that would be blamed on Iran. Here's the news report published before the attack. So what the hell is going on here? Colonel Daniel Davis is the host of the deep dive on YouTube and of course is watching everything unfolding in the Middle East. And the Colonel joins us now to break down this and so many other things. Colonel, great to see you. Always good to be here. Clayton, thanks for having me. So what do you make of this? I don't want to be, I'm sorry, I'm putting on the cynical hat. I'm just so tired of being led down this primrose path
of lies and false flags and operations and media operations and lies. And so I'm sorry if the cynicism comes out in me, but I'll give you the floor. What do you make of this? Yeah, I mean, the same cockpit is you on this one, I think. It's it's yeah, we just don't know. There's so many things we don't know right now. I mean, something did happen. It was blood everywhere, the plane did plummet, et cetera. So I mean, something happened, but the question is what? And the fact that it, you know, as you just kind of laid out there in your monologue there, so many things, you know, just so happened that and thank goodness that this was happened to be there and everything worked out okay. And then that last claim you said that hours before this happened that was already published out there that this presidential false flag going to happen, et cetera. It just makes you say, okay, let's slow this train down here. Let's figure out exactly what happened. Let's do some analysis and a part of it's kind of glad that they landed in Saudi Arabia as opposed in Israel because now that maybe, you know,
we've got some independent eyeballs on this to find out what actually did happen. But the, I think this is the bigger issue here is what you kind of mentioned here before is that we have been lied to so many times and so many things later on prove out to not to be true that now we can't take anything at face value. Listen, it's entirely possible that this is exactly the way it came out, that this crazy co-pilot went after the pilot had planned on crashing the plane. I mean, it could have happened exactly the way it said based on what's happened so far. And it could also be that none of it's true. It could be completely fabricated and that's also equally possible right now. We just can't say within any confidence and when you get to a place to where you have so little confidence in what your government is telling you or your allied governments are saying that you can't take anything at face value, that's a dangerous place to be because one of these days something true is going to happen and they're going to need you to believe it. It's the classic boy who cried, wolf and we're not going to believe it. We're going to say, yeah, we're not stupid. We're not followed for that anymore. And now listen, we don't believe something that we should
because the trust has been destroyed. It's just been shattered. And that's kind of where we are here. And I don't know if you plan on talking about it about me, we could go to RAF Fairford and say what's going on out there because the love stuff don't line up there either. And there's a lot of problems going on right now. Yeah, I'll give you the floor for that in a second, but you're right. And it's sort of like in a courtroom, right? Like what is allowed? What is admissible given this current circumstance? And lawyers have probably argued, well, we now know from Egyptian intelligence and the New York Times reporting. I mean, our own reporting here at Redacted that October 7th in many ways was a false flag operation. The Israeli intelligence, they knew about this ahead of time, well ahead of time. We've spoken to members of the IDF who've told us that, that there were basically citizens laid out there like cannon fodder as a catalyst for this war in Gaza. So is that admissible in this situation? We also know that yes, in fact, Netanyahu is facing what seven criminal charges absolutely probably will lose an election if there is an election.
Like that's kind of relevant. Like might disrupt the elections in which case I might have to cancel set elections like Zelinsky in order to keep staying in power because there's a war on and I need to retain war powers. Like those kinds of things might be brought up in a court of law to say, let's make them admissible for this situation. No? I, yes. I mean, everything should be admissible. Anything that any kind of precedent, any kind of thing that's been on the table that's happened before is definitely relevant to this because you have to establish some kind of credibility or you have to establish some sort of nefariousness. One or the other, depending on which side of the court room you're sending on, but man, from the people's perspective, I want all of it on the table. I want to know exactly what happened and who knew what, when, what they were doing and what they claimed at the time when they knew certain things at the time and that is incredibly relevant here. And listen, this is just a dangerous place to where we're in, like, man, I'm in a second ago,
that if you can't trust anything, then now that you're trust in the government itself starts to your road. And the whole, the horrible system of governance is based on understanding and a tacit acceptance of that there's a minimal level of honesty and integrity between what the government says and what the government say and what the government believe and what they know. There has to be a trust because they're carried far enough. Not only will I fail to believe what I'm told, I may come to believe that you're against me, you're against my interest. If I don't happen to be on whatever narrow band of elites, for example, that you're, whose interests you're working on, if I happen to be in a different set of that, you may be against me. And at some point, this has happened many times in history, the people finally start saying, all right, you're not for me anymore, you're against me. And the government can only rule by the consent of the governed as we certainly know from our civics lessons in a high school. And if you lose that, then you may lose the ability
to govern at all. And then you have civil chaos in probably violence. I mean, that's carried it a long way. But this is on the way to that dangerous spot. Yeah. And I mean, again, I should point out that, again, Benjamin, it's well reported that Benjamin Netanyahu would face this criminal investigation, likely be prosecuted and likely jailed perhaps for the rest of his life. If this goes forward. So it's all of his interests to not hold these elections to remain in power and to keep this boondoggle going for as long as he can and to play this out. So just on the Iranian side, Colonel, like does this, does this make sense for Iran to want to carry out something like this? Like how do you see the current chess pieces playing out right now? Now, one thing that we can say about Iran is that they have been incredibly strategic in their operations and they have been very calculated in their efforts. They've had many opportunities. They could have done a lot more in the military realm
against the United States or Israel. And they have chosen to be very cautious. Even with all the stuff that's been done to them, they have been cautious in trying to get this solved at the lowest possible level. Like for example, they have said that if we go in and if we return to full-scale operations and we hit Carg Island, like General Kellogg is always advocating for and many others or two because of the damage that could do to the long-term damage that could do to the Iranian oil infrastructure and your ability to fund their government, et cetera, is that they have said that they're going to hit a commensurate on the other side. They have not so far chosen to lead with that. They have not said, all right, you know, what you've hit us enough, we're just gonna go and we're gonna strike the next blow there and we're gonna hit you. So they're trying to not expand things and exacerbate things. They're trying to get it solved at the lowest cost to get the war over but still secure their security interest. It would be counterproductive and foolish for them to say, hey, you know what, here's a great idea. Let's go do a civilian terrorist attack on a plane
that's going into Israel and I don't know, that'll show them the thing or do it. Everybody who knows anything at all about Israel or anybody in the West knows that that is gonna elicit a tremendous negative counter-strike. It's never, ever, ever going to make Israel go, oh snap, I didn't realize that there was a cost to war. We better shut it down or there'll be another terrorist attack. Let's give in to them. Nobody does that. It's laughable to even say that out loud. And the one thing you can say about Iran, no matter what you think of their government or their form of government, what they've done to their own people, forget about all that, that doesn't matter. What matters is, are they stupid? No, they're definitely not. They're very calculated and they have shown a lot of restraint. Why then would they choose to do something so reckless that has literally no chance to reduce something positive for them when they're trying to get things settled over here actually on the battlefield. So you can never limit in anything. I mean, who knows, there could be some, I don't know, evil people inside the government that says, yeah, we don't care about our benefit and we're gonna do something bad here.
I can't eliminate that possibility because when you're in a war, you may do something like that, but it's incredibly unlikely. It would be totally out of character to anything we've ever seen out of Iran. True. You brought up the Royal Air Force Base in Fairford in England, which early Sunday morning, five men were arrested on suspicion of trying to plant this explosive there and all signs from the UK. UK now saying a strong indication that Iran was involved in this incident basing US Air Forces at the housing there in Fairford. So you're seeing a lot of this now. You're seeing a lot of these alarm bells and is a friend of the show Colonel Towner Watkins likes to point out about Operation Gladio and these NATO stay behind armies that create these types of explosive devices, create these types of false flag events in order to further drag us into war. So maybe I'll just give you the floor on what happened, what you believe may have happened
or the inconsistencies at Fairford. Well, the first thing that just jumps out at me is what is it there of being alleged to have done even? I mean, the fact that they're put out on bail right away tells you that I mean, you're not going to do the legal system unless there's no threats that go beyond that. And when you look at what they found, so they found these three vans kind of out in the middle of the woods so they're definitely something shady going on with that. That's why would they be out there at center or at least five guys, what are they doing? But then you look at what they found in them, there was no explosives, there were no drones, there was apparently a little bit of fuel but mostly empty barrels of various kinds. So what is it there alleged to be preparing? What a terrorist attack are they going to do? And then Andy Burnham this morning, but it's a point it's saying yes, we have evidence that Iran may have been behind this and my question is behind what actually? What is it you're claiming the legend that they're going to do? Apparently they've been charged with some kind of terrorism
or something but terrorism of what? What are they actually being charged with? Were they going to blow up housing? Were they going to park in this force and then later on go get some explosives? I mean, were they going to do something like Operation Spider Web, which we loved it when the Ukraine side did that to something on an air-based deep in Russia where a lot of these strikes come from. And we thought it was really cool when the Ukrainians were doing it to the Russians but now all of a sudden if, if it's true, we all of a sudden are like how dare the Ukrainians actually do something to us way back here outside of the combat zone. And so if they did, I mean, we can't be shockated because our guys, our side, did that to the Russian side, hidden an air-based that was way deep in the rear with these, in that case with drones. But that's why I was looking to see, well, were there drones in these vans, were they going to do something similar to that? Was it something that I still don't know? I mean, that's just before we came on the air here. And I can't find anything in the British media
that says what these guys actually were planning to do or what Andy Burnham is saying that what information they have that is a run was behind it. I don't know what they're behind but I'd kind of like to know those are kind of important questions to answer. Right. Yeah, what exactly are they behind? Maybe we should answer that and hopefully we will get some answers from the UK intelligence. Stay right there, Colonel, if you will. Take a quick break. I want to come back and talk about a rock. 23 years later, we're finally pulling up, moving our troops out, getting the tanks, getting armament out of there, but there's some people, of course, who aren't happy about all of that. So we'll talk about that in a second. But first, you can claim $10 in US stablecoin for free. And set up your first tip with rumble wallet. It's easy to set up. If you don't want the big banks controlling your money and you want to have access to all the crypto and all of your stablecoins and everything, you can do that and know what not even rumble has access to your rumble wallet. Just go to wallet.rumble.com slash redacted.
This segment is, of course, sponsored by our friends at rumble wallet. And you can tip your favorite creator. You get that $10 in US stablecoin. You can tip your favorite creator if you want to. I don't need a tip. You don't have to tip me. Just keep it for yourself if you want to. But totally up to you, all you need to do is scan the QR code there on the screen. Enter the code redacted 10 to jump start your wallet with that $10 in US AT for tipping or you can keep it for yourself, whatever you want to do. And this is only live for a limited number of wallets. So don't let it sit scan that QR code or the link in our description download rumble wallet today. Try it for yourself. Don't forget to use the code redacted 10, claim $10 for tipping. US AT restrictions apply. There are a limited number of entries available terms and conditions apply. See the description or visit rumble.com slash promo official rules for details. Well, after 23 years, American troops are finally leaving Iraq. And think about that for a moment actually. A child born when the United States invaded Iraq in 2003
is now 23 years old. We were told the war would eliminate weapons of mass destruction that were never found. Of course, we're never there in the first place. We were told it would transform the Middle East, bring democracy to the Middle East. Because that's what they want. They want our form of democracy. They've been around for thousands of years, but they want what we've got. OK, instead thousands of Americans were killed millions of Iraqis were killed trillions of dollars spent. Neocons are of course already warning that this creates a vacuum that Iran will gain influence or that ISIS could eventually reconstitute itself. Is that our responsibility? What now? Of course, one of those people that's not happy about us leaving Iraq is the very same man that wanted us to go to war in Iraq in the first place. Saddam is hell bent on achieving atomic bombs, atomic capabilities as soon as he can.
Joining me now is one of the men who spent years thinking about these exact questions and what it means for the United States of America. Colonel Daniel Davis, host of a deep dive on YouTube is back with us, Colonel. It's first of all just at a high level, 23 years. I think for a lot of Americans thought this thing has been over a long time. Remember George W. Bush told us mission accomplished a year ago, like what the heck? What we're still there 23 years later? Yeah, this is just the the war that would never die. And so I'm skeptical it's going to be over now because I mean, not only was mission accomplished you know, months in, you know, Obama comes in and said, you know, we're going to get rid of this. It's the the bad war. So let's get this thing over with and to great fanfare and I think it was October 2011. He announced that the mission had come to an end that he had met his campaign promise that he and the Iraqi leadership were eye to eye on what needs to happen. They've been trained up and they are ready to handle their own security. Just ask any of the generals that were in charge there.
They also did their good to go, except for, oh yeah, yeah, three years later, they collapse at the first opportunity when it's a small number of ISIS insurgent fighters to put them to the test and the whole army collapsed. And then I never understood this. There's probably so many things behind it. But Obama instead of just saying, hey, dude, we told you three years ago that was the itch you're on your own. You and Basha are all so I figured this out because there's a city in Iran and Syria that's been taken over by ISIS. And now Mosul has been taken over. You lost a lot of troops in some other place because everybody else ran and now they're coming back to Baghdad. Man, you guys need to get it together. You have my best. Good luck. Instead, he says, you know what, okay, let's go back in and help you. And Obama did it and this was always the plan. And this happened so many times. And he couldn't just say, all right, we're gonna send 5,000 troops in because everybody go all up and arm and get crazy. And said he says, we're gonna send 250 advisors. And you know, we're gonna advise them on this or that whatever.
And then they would get like a few months later, there'd be another 250. And then 500 here and there. And then it eventually got up to whatever it was, 5,000, some number like that. And then we're back in the game. And then now we never didn't leave until yesterday. I guess it was. And so when you look at the overall here, you think that again, just like we were talking about a minute ago, nobody's ever been honest with us. This is part of the problem while we can't believe something in face value because we were told that the war was over. We were told that we were out there on their own that everything had been done, that the Iraqi security forces were trained and they weren't. And then we said that we were told, well, we're just going in there for a few guys here and we weren't. We ended up going in there basically putting our air force on the line, especially in in Raka, in Syria. And then in Mosul too, I actually was on the ground to see part of that during that after I had retired from the army and watched part of that stuff unfold there and the war was going on, we're just supporting it. And then we never left again. And everybody keeps talking about over and over about, oh, we can't because the medal,
that'll create a vacuum. It'll help Iran and listen. Sorry, I'm kind of on my soapbox here, but this whole thing about Iran is like, listen, are you where I actually pull this up on for one of my shows earlier today? In January 1st, 1991. And so that is while we were in the middle of Operation Desert Shield at the time and me and Colonel McGregor actually were on the ground in Saudi Arabia getting ready to attack on the ground in there and we had not yet started the air war. And at that time, there was a policy of the US, this is hey, we need to get back to a balance between Iran and Iraq so they balance each other off and we have regional stability. They used to be our objective. Because of this war that George Bush started and that Obama continued on and everybody else from Trump to Biden, just let it languish, all it did was transfer it into basically an appendage of Iran. There were now part of the actual military forces for Iraq to this day are our shea-based militia
that are influenced by in some cases supported by Iran. So they're very friendly today. So we took and taken what was balanced in each other often out and they're kind of working together hence the reason why the United States had to attack some of the PMFs in Iraq with Saudi Arabia, just the other day, which also angered them as well. But there's just hardly anything is true. I still don't know what all of this for sure is. What's not, all we know is that there was never a need for any of this as you said in your opening. None, we didn't need to go back into 2014, or Baghdad and Syria with Bush all of a sudden. They should have handled it. Of two-one Obama should have done it. He said, y'all figured out, man, this is your country. Figure it out. Instead he had to go back in and kind of help and hold her hand whatever. And then we never left. And then even when Iraq wanted us to leave, yeah, no, we don't want to leave. It's not safe. Oh, I know, counter-ISIS. That's what it is. And that's what actually in this counter, this announcement that you see Sean Parnell,
we didn't leave. We just repositioned into Jordan. So we're continuing to conduct the counter-ISIS mission. And he said, which is complete bogus. There's no counter-ISIS mission. I mean, that's just, you're going after a straw man here. Something that doesn't a unicorn is more like it. Because you're never gonna eliminate ISIS. We couldn't do it all the time we were there. You can go and you can have night raids and you can kill guys here and there. You can do that forever. But you'll never get rid of ISIS because it's an ideology. And very often times the names change because the new groups come up. You're never gonna get rid of it. So it's all a conrad to keep us there. There's no truth to it. And it's definitely not needed for any American national security in our country today. We were told that this was in our national interest to go into Iraq. Has it helped the United States of America? What we did in Iraq? It has helped us lose trillion to dollars, which you also said in your opening. It has helped us to have lots of soldiers
to this day who still suffer from PTSD, who suffer from traumatic brain injury. Some of whom are my friends and it just angers me to see that that was inflicted upon them in the name of allegedly these weapons of mass destruction or whatever else. No, there was never any need for America to go in there ever. It was all manufactured. We know that now. I mean, that's open. But unfortunately instead of recognizing, oh yeah, we were lied into a war and then we were lying to stay in there year after year after decade after decade. How about we finally wake up and say, you know what, y'all are all the bunch of liars. This is all stupid. We're, bring them all home. Bring every one of them home to defend our country. Why they signed up. They did not sign up to go fight wars. I'm sick and tired of hearing that. It angers me when I hear people say, hey, it's what they signed up for. Yeah, they should go and have combat. No, no, no. Nobody signed up to just go have combat. We signed up to serve our country and to defend our way of life, not to fight for some other country, not to fight for some other interests somewhere else
or moneyed into this or some elite. So our security is not enhanced at all. In fact, this is one of the things that this war with Iran is graphically showing here that conclusively, irrevocably. This whole four defense thing that we have in all these bases that we have scattered to the four winds and the four seas in our country and this world right now are nothing but strategic anchors. They are nothing but hold in this back. They cost a lot and they provide no security for our country at great expense. And then when tested, all they are is missile magnets and getting our people killed and wounded and enforcing them to go somewhere else further back away because we can't defend them in the modern era. That's just the reality of it. So instead of ignoring the truth and continuing to spend money and keeping our security spread out and thinned out everywhere, let's bring it back home where they can actually be defended and they can actually provide value for our country at an affordable price. How about that? That's a great idea. Imagine that. But the war hawks and neocons who immediately
is this announcement was unfolding, we're flagging this and we can't, it'll create this power vacuum, of course, and as many of our viewers have pointed out today here with their comments live, that the war machine needs it. It needs this movement to continue and to continue and to continue and to roll and roll and roll. Does it not? Yeah, in fact, I was, I think the first time was, because I still have the clips somewhere, from 2019 I went on Fox News and it was just arguing, this was after Trump said, okay, mission accomplished on the Syrian operation. We took the two, Raka and Mosul back from ISIS. And we said, yeah, we have defeated them militarily. Great time for parade and come home. And instead we stayed there. And when Trump, three times in his first administration said he was going to bring them home that war hawk community you're talking about there, we're crazy. And then they started putting all kinds of pressure on him to backtrack and to go off of it. And in that time, he gave into it and didn't do it. But they made those same arguments then too.
I bet you could go back up and pull up the old press releases and they just put a new name and date on it and fired it out here because they're saying the same thing. It wasn't true then. It's not true now. And that just shows the emptiness of their argument that that's all they can do is just say, oh my God, vacuums and whatever else. There was no vacuums then, there would be no vacuums now. Look at what happened in the Middle East during the Reagan administration after the Beirut bombing and that happened to the Marines and all that terrible stuff. Reagan was initially going to go in and do the same thing that most of the most other presidents would do and oh, we're going to go and get them. And he said, you know what, actually forget it. We're not going to. We're not going to be left in for eight years. No Americans were in the region at all. Did it collapse? Did this vacuum happen that turned into something negative for us? No, we just didn't have to spend any more money and we didn't lose any more troops. That's what happened and then we were able, all of our security was maintaining strengthen at a less cost because we didn't have to spend any there. That's the reality. That's what actually could happen here if we withdraw.
It won't cause any problems for us. That means somebody else has to get the headaches and that we now only have to defend ourselves. That's what we should do. Yeah, I mean, how the Fox News crowd is not going to like that. Spin is strong, right? Which is, you know, we actually have been inviting me back anytime soon. I don't know what you're going to want. That's surprising. That's surprising. Well, Colonel, it's 23 years. I mean, I guess I'll get you out of here on this question, which is, I mean, what do you think happens next with Iraq? You know, we're, if you listen to the narratives coming out of these think tanks in Washington, yes, it's going to create this vacuum. It's going to be a disaster. It Ron will rise supreme over this. Yeah. Or is it okay? No, I got to answer that. Okay. Reposition so that it's that we're still there. Yeah. This, this presupposes that argument presupposes that when those troops were there, something good was happening. There was no vacuum and then we were doing something and that is enough. They have no idea. You know what we were doing all these years when they apparently claimed it was good for
our country. Some of those troops were doing, they were sitting in a dam barracks. They weren't doing anything at all. Maybe some of them were periodically doing these night raids or something with ISIS just to keep the fiction going here, but that made no difference in anything. Most of the time they did literally nothing. So they didn't provide any combat power. They were advising somebody they could do that with zoom. I mean, let's just be honest about it. So we were never doing anything. So whatever this vacuum they claimed, it was already in existence because the reality on the ground is it's been Iraq since whatever the last seven, eight, ten years, I guess, really since the ISIS had been knocked down, however long that ago was. So yeah, so there's no truth to that either. It is just this that cannot think anything besides no must have troops everywhere. And that's just false. Well, and finally, I mean, I've spoken to sources who were literally there in Iraq carrying along with the CIA and they were told to keep quiet. They were taking pallets of cash right off of these airplanes and moving this giant pallets
of cash as a massive money-long-during operation there. So I guess that's going to come to an end in part. Now it'll be repositioned somewhere else, but yeah. Yeah. Well, 23 years, it's unbelievable to think about it. I mean, yeah, I mean, 20 years in Afghanistan, 23 years in Iraq, nothing but a wasteland of cost to our country. If nothing else, those two things should replace Vietnam as the image of what not to do. I pray to God that happens. Oh, amen, amen. Colonel, always great to see you. Thank you so much for joining us, my friend. Where can people find your show? I can find us on the Daniel Davis deep dive on YouTube, just Google's there. You'll find us or Daniel L. Davis, the number one on X, and you'll find us there too. Amazing. As always, Colonel, great to have you here. Thank you so much. Thanks, Clay. Pleasure. Appreciate it. Thanks, Colonel. All right. Coming up next, we're going to talk about this AI meeting at the White House, and we just got an announcement from a bit of breaking news from Secretary of War, Pete Hague,
Seth announcing that Elon Musk will co-lead a new war department effort. Oh, my God. You have studied the future of warfare during his state of the force address. So it's called Project Meridian, and Elon Musk will be, and Palmer Lucky as well, and Newt Gingrich. It will be a part of this effort. That's just a sidebar because this big AI meeting that took place yesterday, Elon Musk in attendance, Mark Zuckerberg in attendance, Dario from Anthropic in attendance. Everyone was there. Notably absent, though, with Sam Altman from Open Eye AI. So what is going on with the future of AI in this country and the US government? We will talk about that in moments. But first, you've heard us report that the US dollar is losing value daily. Well our national debt is out of control, and you can bet no one in Washington or Wall Street is worrying about your finances or how you're going to afford retirement. That's why you and only you need to take care of your family.
That in bottom line. The government is not going to do it. You need to become financially independent yourself, self-sustaining, making sure you have food supplies on hand, but also protecting your family and breaking free from this banking system. Now if you're wondering how there's a method that's been proven time and time again, and real estate has actually created more millionaires than any other investment type in history. It's exactly how Natalie and I broke free as well. We were able to do this because we aren't dependent on a boss. And a number of years ago when I was working for somebody else and we couldn't pay the mortgage and we had to figure out what to do. We needed to figure out to be self-sustaining ourselves. We bought a few properties that were distressed. I was able to totally renovate them and change my life, change the trajectory of my life. And so I always talk about on this show, Gold, Silver, Real Estate, tangible assets that aren't really in any way controlled by the federal government. You can do the same thing. Now your path might look totally different than mine.
Probably will. Maybe you're already advanced and investing. Maybe you're already very smart with it. That's great. We actually created an investor quiz that lets you figure out where you are on this ladder right now. It'll take you about 60 seconds to fill out. It's very easy to do. It's an investor quiz. Just go to redacted.insc slash quiz. And so stop wishing you had a portfolio of performing assets. Take actions. Start building one today right now because this is the legacy that you will leave for your kids performing assets rather than a mountain of debt. So go to redacted.insc slash quiz. Take it while you keep listening today. And feel free to ask any questions you want. I'm always available on Twitter. You can ask me any time you want about it. So all right. Well tech leaders gathered at the White House yesterday for an AI luncheon. It lasted about two hours hosted by a president Donald Trump and House Speaker Mike Johnson. All the big guys were there. Dario from Anthropic. Elon Musk was there. Mark Zuckerberg, Jensen Wong from Nvidia.
Notem noticeably absent though was Sam Altman from open AI unless he squirted in later. But I didn't I didn't see him. Mark Zuckerberg there talking about the future of what he wants for his customers and making sure that it's transparent and open. And that data centers are going to be very, very popular president Trump said data centers. You know, they might be unpopular now. We're going to teach you probably through our friends at Fox News to love data centers. Zach for he's blew the whistle on Google back in 2019 exposing the company's secret censorship practices. He is the author of Google leaks a whistleblower's expose of big tech censorship. And he joins us now to help us make sense of this big meeting yesterday. Zach great to see you again. Welcome back. Right to be here. Thank you very much. So what do you make of this meeting yesterday in the wake of that sort of big hoax that unfolded over the past few weeks from anthropic and open AI and this idea that AI is getting
out of hand. So we need to build a mode around it. We need government regulation. Even president Trump yesterday called it a hoax. The fear of AI. So in fact, he was in fact calling Dario out to his face like you guys created this hoax. You went to the United Nations. You try to pull this BS. Anyway, sorry, let me stop letting me ramble. But what is your sense of this meeting yesterday and what it means for the future of data build out data center buildouts and AI in this country? Right. Well, let's start with some background. You had this whistleblower Jason Cokeson that basically left anthropic to go work for a company called meter. METR, which was financed by the same investment groups that were investing in anthropic. So it turns out that the investor group is also funding both sides of the coin. On one side, they got the AI company. On the other side, they've got the company that monitors and audits the AI company. And so anthropic is going to be monitored by meter.
As we all know, it turns out that you know, that is very fishy that a whistleblower would go to the very company that anthropic would then later partner with a day later. That's funded by its investment group. You had open AI that left open back doors and it directed the hack. And essentially the AI did exactly what it was told. And then they had the shocked face when it happened. And this was all leading up, you know, to present Trump kind of giving a surprise and profound declaration that if the AI companies wanted to slow down, they could do it themselves. And now here we are at the Artificial Superintelligence Summit at the White House. And we had Trump basically signing off that these companies can go ahead and monitor and audit themselves. And what the signals to is that government is not going to interfere right now. We're not going to get the Biden style commissures that are going to regulate these AI
companies. We're not going to get the Bernie Sanders style regulation that's going to slow this down and give people basically 20 years in prison for doing something as simple as fine tuning a model. And so my analysis is that I think this is very positive. I do think that we need to get at least self monitoring in place. I don't appreciate the siop set accompanied this, but at the end, I think that this is a really great middle ground. And I agree with you actually, which I'm glad the Trump administration kind of came out quickly, even Scott Besson called it a hoax said, no, we're not going to, we're not doing this. And it kind of got flagged pretty quickly. It just was the whole orchestration of it just smelled like a dirty rat, you know, under Bernie Sanders direction, whoever suddenly there's legislation available. There's front page stories on time magazine. There's a new documentary that hit on Netflix about the scariness of AI immediately.
So to scare and spook all of us. And these companies, of course, are massive, you're using massive amounts of money right now burning through it, all this capital in order to build out. And they are swimming in an enormous amount of debt. And you've got these open source models that are now showing enormous promise, which are doing incredible things. And so they're scared, right? I mean, I think at the end of the day, Dario, Sam Altman, they're scared that, hey, people aren't going to pay maybe $200 a month for their product if they can get these open source models up and running on our own computers and not have to use them. And it'll actually a couple of a lot of big companies now instead of relying on Sam Altman's anthropic and others are building really maybe their own proprietary AI using some of these open source models internally, Amazon and others. So I don't know. What do you think about that part of it that these companies are really just trying to save themselves? Did they get a talking to yesterday? Do you get the sense that Dario got a talking to from President Trump and the administration yesterday? Like, hey, you better back off.
I mean, yes. I mean, I feel that the really big winner here is Jensen Wang. I don't know if I'm saying that correctly, but in video, the CEO, he wants to have open AI, like a truly open marketplace of open AI models that can run on local hardware. Because essentially, he's going to be selling the hardware that's able to do that. And obviously, China's not going to play by these self-regulation rules. They want to get these, they want to compete. And their models have come out and have been cheaper. And China wants to compete. Trump says, hey, you know, what's wrong with American innovation? You guys got to compete to no breaks and look what happened in the last week. We had the largest increase in model intelligence in the history of America. You had anthropic releasing Opus 5.5. Their budget luxury model that grabbed first place beat the luxury model of the previous
generation fable. And then they followed that up with Sonnet 5.5, which then took second place, beating out their previous generation luxury model and beating out all of open AI's models. Then OpenAI came out and said, well, we're going to one up everybody else with Soul 6.1, which then again, took the lead. And now it's not even close. Right now, you can get the exact same tasks done at one thirtieth of the price with the new GPT 6.1 models. And so what we had is we had basically this is better than sports. We had this anticipation that China was going to keep was going to catch up. And then you had both anthropic and open AI, the front runners completely dominate the entire worldwide market for the smartest models on the planet.
I know it was absolutely crazy. So we're slowing down. And then suddenly we've got these incredible models that just unfolded at a breakneck pace, unbelievable, one unfolded last week. And so Trump's point is, look, you need to police yourself. And my thought in all of this was, well, we have a DOJ. We have court systems. We have lawsuits in this country. We have lawyers. A company does something nefarious to people like dumps polluting chemicals in someone's backyard. Then guess what, Aaron Brockovich comes in. You get people who are angry. You go to the courts. You you file lawsuits. You the DOJ can come in and actually prosecute a company for doing nefarious things to the American people. So we already have these guardrails in place. Do you believe that they are going to police themselves and keep things safe, though, for us? Yes. And it looks like the law is starting to go in that direction.
First, you have the policy with x.com Elon Musk saying that Brock wasn't responsible for its responses. It's actually the people directing the responses that are responsible for Brock's, which was kind of an eye opener, but it's going to make sense. If you direct the AI to commit a crime, it's the person directing the AI to make the crime. It's going to be responsible. And then I also see stronger and stronger guardrails coming in. Essentially, what I see is a middle ground where if you use one of these sanctioned AI's with guardrails, it's going to be these companies are going to be responsible for you not committing these crimes. But if you get an open source model, remove the guardrails, then commit crimes. It's almost like breaking and entering. And we're starting to see the lines form about what is correct and unlawful behavior.
And this is really good news because we really didn't have any idea about where the limits are, like if you direct an agent to commit a crime, who's responsible for that as if the agent were as a person. And now we're starting to see that at the ultimate end of the spectrum, it's going to be the person responsible for prompting it to do that. But on the other side, it's also going to be the company's responsibility to guard against that. I just want to finish here by saying that OpenAI told their agents to escape the box. And I feel that there is an investigation that is necessary to see why did they hack all these different companies? Why do they hack Hugginkface? Should OpenAI be responsible for that? They can't claim a surprise when they ask agents to hack something and then they do it. And there's a lot of questions that need to be answered about that.
Yeah, I mean, look, just with any company, like I think that they have to act according to the law. I mean, that's just that's the way it goes. AI company or Monsanto. And if they don't, then you have massive class action lawsuits that go after these individuals and prosecute them. So that's the way that I operate. But I don't think we want government regulation because that's socialism. You have government regulation propping up certain industries, nationalizing certain companies at socialism. And I don't want socialism in this country in the same way that we back ethanol, corn industry, you know, in the Midwest and prop that up and destroy all of our cars as a result of it. I mean, the list is endless. That's socialism in my mind. So no, if you do something wrong, we prosecute you and you'll be thrown in jail. And maybe is that why Sam Altman wasn't there yesterday because of this whole hacking incident? Did you find it weird that he was absent from this White House meeting? We've got depth day going on yesterday.
Sam Altman was in a bunch of different places. He was at one White House dinner and Dario was not there was speculation about whether Dario was on the outs now, you know, today it's like his Sam Altman on the outs. Look, these people are trying to change the world. They've got these frontier models. As far as I know, they don't have a bunch of clones running around. It's ending all these different conferences that they've got to be at at the same time. So I think there's only just one of them. They can only be at one place at a time and, you know, with work like that, you can't spend your entire time, you know, gloating around the world on a plane. You also have to be running your companies. I guess finally, the President Trump said Americans are going to love data centers. That's kind of laughing. Okay, Americans are going to love data centers. Are we going to embrace data centers in our own backyard? I mean, I guess if they're creating thousands of jobs and they don't steal the water, they don't use the energy that we are communities need. And they're, they just look like a giant Amazon warehouse. Is that where you're going to start embracing them?
Oh, man, you're not going to like my answer on this. It's multifaceted, right? First off, like if you don't like paying taxes, you want those data centers in your place, right? First of all, let me say I have no agenda. Like, I just want to, you know, I'm just, I'm just curious the answer here. I have no agenda. I'm, I, I'm pretty flexible when it comes to facts and facts have presented me. I, I will change my opinion. So go ahead, sorry. Well, let me ask you a question first. You've seen how AI is basically getting better and better and better. Every single iteration that we have at it in the future are humans going to be able to compete with robots? Yes or no? No. No. Okay. We both agree on that. So if does it make sense in the future, if only humans have to pay taxes and AI work does not, no, no, it doesn't, right? So if AI is going to be doing is basically going to be funding the government with taxes, where are you going to want to have those data centers?
You're going to want to have those data centers in those city areas where you're going to be able to tax them for the revenue necessary to provide for society 2.0. And right now we have this trend that everybody wants to put the data centers as far as ways possible. The problem with that is that if you put a data center into a different jurisdiction, that jurisdiction gets the tax rights of these data centers. And so I've got this very unique idea. I kind of go against the grain. I feel that these data centers should be in the jurisdiction of these city minutes palaties that need to generate income in the future when human labor has been removed from the economic tax pool. Am I wrong? No, I guess I'm, you know, just sad about the sudden disappearance of human labor. Like that's the, that's the part that we're going to all have to grapple with as we move towards this new robot frontier that's going to be powered by AI.
I mean, it's coming. You, you know, I don't want to be the old man on the front porch. It's like, get off my lawn. It's already here. It's already happening. So how do we figure this out? I guess. Look, it's a brand new world and the problem is is that you can't really figure stuff out until there's a new equilibrium. When we don't know where the equilibrium point is going to be, right? I mean, there's a lot of people that think that AI is slop, which was probably true in 2026, but it's not true now in, you know, late September 2026. And by 2027, we're going to be well past the point of artificial intelligence into the realm of artificial super intelligence, where it's going to be like, well, of course, that we don't give that to a human that AI is going to be able to do all of your taxes and all your software development at, you know, 1,000 of the cost at a thousand times to the speed. And so the problem is is that if we, if the people in charge try to re-evaluate everything right now, it's a moving target.
And it will be invalidated in the next three months. Like, you know that? I know that like this is moving so fast right now that we don't know even where the saturation of intelligence is going to lie. And so unfortunately, we're going into an era of unstable expectations, a lot of change. People do not like change, but unfortunately, the tie, the tsunami of technical innovation is going to happen whether we want it or fight against it or go with the flow. And for all those out there that are, you know, that like to surf, grab your surfboard and ride the wave because it's going to be one hell of a ride. Yeah, it's going to be crazy. It already is. For sure. Zach, great to see you. Thank you for your analysis on this. And really appreciate it. We'll of course be trying to stay on top of this wave that's unfolding on top of us all. Zach, great to see you. Thanks so much. Thank you so much. Next time. All right. Coming up here on the show, we're going to talk about government and their cloud program,
cloud seating program and weather manipulation. And finally, it seems like the mainstream media is starting to come around to the idea that in fact, what the CIA, what we all know and these secret government programs have been around for decades, decades. But of course, the naming of all of this is a little funky and they're trying to throw you off the trail. So we're going to talk about the revelations of the CIA and cloud seating in a moment. But first, here's something I feel compelled to keep bringing up for everyone's benefit because look, we have toxins affecting our health in every way. Maybe you've taken that certain vaccine out there. You know what? It's still being advertised on television by Travis Kelsey. Or you've been around people who have taken it and you're worried about graphene oxide, which a lot of experts believe could make our body reactive to different technologies. Yes, being controlled remotely by governments or state actors. Because we've done deep dive segments on this, by the way. I hope you've seen them. If you haven't, you need to seek them out and watch them on the channel here.
The toxins from the vaccine. And we've done interviews about this and experts talking about 5G and 6G technology and how it actually interacts with the circuitry that's in our own body from these vaccines. I know it might sound like a like crazy talk, but now the science is in on it. And you can watch the scans of the human body that are actually interacting with this and showing our human bodies giving off like these Bluetooth signals. It's incredible. After they've gotten these shots, there's spoke spike proteins. It's well documented. But I keep bringing it up because we have a finally a way to get them out of our body. It's something called masterpiece. And we've had them on our show before. I talk about them a lot because I love these guys. And this is an all natural formula. It tastes like seawater. Put a little drop in the drop or underneath your tongue. It's made with natural zeolite, which is a volcanic mineral. It grabs these toxins like a tiny magnet everywhere that they're in your body, even the brain,
heart, your lung tissue, and then it flushes it out of the body. It's harmless to your body. So it's the good nano fighting the bad nano. And they've got dozens of studies. One of the study shows that they get rid of this synthetic circuitry of the graphene oxide by up to 90%. It removes the other toxins as well. How I feel about it personally after taking it for a few months now, better sleep, more energy. I feel fantastic. And if you're around somebody who got the vaccine or you know from individuals shedding and otherwise, like that's how you can get these toxins in your body, regardless if you've taken it or not. So they have thousands of testimonials, including a lot of people who watch our show, who have told me they're experiencing the same thing. It's the real deal. I'm telling you to check it out. It makes sense when you're getting out these toxins and then you're giving your body these sea minerals that actually your cells love. But ultimately you should try it for yourself because it's only about a dollar a day, which is I think the most cost effective way for you that you can protect yourself from everything that's out there. We have a special link.
So you can try it for yourself, save 10% off. Just go to masterpiece.health. It's not.com. It's masterpiece.health slash redacted. This is going to help your body get back the autonomy that it deserves. It's going to help you stop agenda 2030 in its tracks and stay human for crying out loud. So check about today masterpiece.health slash redacted. Save 10% off every bottle that you order. All right. Let's check in on the chat room here and we've got a great segment coming up here in a second. So how's everyone doing out there? Hope everyone is doing well. Well, it seems like the mainstream media is finally starting to catch up to reality that in fact the government has been manipulating poisoning the sky with toxins, destroying our environment, controlling our weather. Here's the daily mail CIA accused of poisoning the sky with toxins as files expose secret weather control agenda. Once top secret CIA files have been detailed, America's plans to control the world by manipulating the weather.
These documents declassified in 2003, discuss the controversial topic of weather modification, the tactic of launching rockets or using planes to dump chemicals into the atmosphere that alter the climate and local storm systems. And goes on to make a number of inaccurate claims about this entire process. But one person who has been on the vanguard, trying to educate all of us about this. And I think is now breaking through in big, big ways because the mainstream media in larger part and members of Congress, of course, are taking heed of this and his warnings is Dane Wigington, who joins us now from just want to make sure we've got Dean. Here we do. Dan is here. Dan Wigington is joining us now from geoengineeringwatch.org and has been doing an incredible job. By the way, if you want like an encyclopedia knowledge of all of this research, just go to Dan's website, watch the documentary, the dimming and who he watches this on a daily basis to make sure there were all in front of this.
Dane, great to have you here. Welcome back to the show, my friend. Thank you, Clayton. Thank you for your continued effort to pull back the curtain and to weave all of this together. Even with your previous segment, not only is this weather warfare in our skies, but it's chemical and biological warfare as well and our testing proves that in addition to aluminum, barium, strontium, manganese, polymer fibers and surfactants, we have graphene in the rain. Graphene is named in climate is during patents as well for chemical ice nucleation for one. We've talked just about this before the flash freeze snowstorms that happen in places like New Orleans blizzards there while it's raining in the Arctic. So graphene is in our air column as well. And that goes right into our body. And now we have the studies that show that it can be manipulated with technology through 5G, 6G technology, even remotely. I always get this picture of like a guy in a CIA white van parked down the street like doing horrible things to people controlling the thoughts, controlling their their emotions and all of that. We now know that in fact they can do this remotely. They don't have to be like sitting in a van down the street. They can be doing this remotely and think about elections.
So you might not have taken the vaccine. You might not have taken the shot. But if your skies are being filled with graphene oxide and raining down on a population and you have an agenda for how you want to carry out an election or manipulation. That's very convenient, isn't it? And there's other layers to this as well. In addition to frequency transmissions effect on all life because life is electrical. We know that in biological warfare elements like polymer fibers and graphene are used as biological carrier platform, security pathogen from the clouds to the ground. Why would we think they're not conducting various levels of biological warfare and experimentation right now on all of us? Why in the world? We think they aren't when we know they already have. We know from the Washington Post reporting going back as far as 1977. There were no less than 239 open air biological tests conducted by the US military and innocent, unknowing US civilians, even as of that time. How many have they done since. And again, we know that there are biological carrier platforms in our rain.
And these are named in climatic, and patents as well. Why would we think they're not using them for dual purpose because they use everything for dual purpose. And we know with the CV19 outbreak outbreak Clayton, we know that at 1.85 countries were infected in three days. That's indicative of an airborne dispersion. We've talked about this before, but it's important for people to remember. We know that the world's second most recognized geoengineered, Dr. Ken Caldera, stated on the record because we own the audio and stating it that one of his jobs for the USDOD was to design methods of spraying pathogens in the clouds to infect the populations below. We know Italian researchers identified CV19 attached to airborne particulates. Why would we think all this doesn't connect, including the graphene that we now know is in our rain, graphene and polymer fibers biological carrier platforms, not just weather warfare, but weather chemical and biological warfare in our skies. So when this stuff hits the ground, and I will first of all, me, you can talk about the mechanism, like how is exactly it being sprayed graphene oxide. We've talked about aluminum and other particulates, but graphene oxide specifically is at all part of this.
Cocktail that's being sprayed by these government aircraft. Yes, and these are aerosol dispersions. This is not jet exhaust. We have a huge component that the current administration, along with previous administrations, this one more so than any is trying to push a regurgitated official denial that this is just some sort of form of jet exhaust. And common sense should kick in at some point shouldn't it Clayton? People should figure out without any input for me or you or anybody else. When you have grid patterns in your sky one day and nothing the next with similar atmospheric pattern, something's obviously going on. We have these aircraft, especially in the case of military tankers that have the largest payloads by far. Their transponders are turned off. Shouldn't that put a light bulb on somewhere for somebody. We have airspace with no commercial corridors that when they're doing dispersions as you see in these photographs you're showing. Thank you. And there's no commercial corridors again. And what are all these aircraft doing? They're doing expatterns. They're going diagonally ovals.
Obviously this is going on Clayton. For all the other things we're worried about right now. Isn't it profound? At least it is to me. How many people are arranging deck chairs on the Titanic right now focusing on causes and concerns that won't mean anything. If we can't stop these dispersions from tainting every single breath we take. And we know from recent period viewed science study that many of these elements like polymer nanoparticles are showing up in all human organs. And these aren't just it's not just a matter of a simple decomposition because our scientists at our PI that we work with examined some of the particles we captured with the Noah flying lab. These were manufactured particles, not just simple decomposition. And let's add aluminum to the mix because all these particles mixed together create what's known as synergistic toxicity and all of them toxic by themselves far worse when they're mixed. And aluminum is bioavailable. And that's what we're talking about is toxic to all life period insects are crashing. We have wildlife around the globe crashing soils are being literally sterilized. You can't go anything in California. Literally the soil microbiome is dead Clayton because our rain is toxic, which means our air is toxic. We're all breathing it.
We're a larger organism. It's going to take longer for us to succumb. But why aren't more people talking about this? A sewer of seed says I recorded some of these planes with my Nikon P900 unmarked planes, I believe. You can tackle that. But also talking to talking to friends in Florida who notice now since the ban has taken place. You can address this in Florida, DeSantis going after it. I don't know if it's all performative. If he's actually doing some great things. I know they said they've banned it, but there's still some planes that are still emerging. They've shut down certain airports because they've caught some of these planes taking off from certain airports in Florida according to reports. Maybe you can tackle the unmarked plane thing and the Florida situation with the banning there. Have we seen an appreciable decline in these chemicals in the sky there now with the ban? No, not in Florida, not in Tennessee, not in Louisiana. So we see people that maybe are in some area that is is been exempt. Because it's not on a program based on whether the weather systems are moving over at that time, but they jumped at conclusions far too quickly because we're hearing from lots and lots of people in Florida that's worse than ever.
And in regard to what Florida is doing and rather I should say not doing. I was on a number of conference calls with Joseph Lattipo, certain general Florida and Florida scientists. And Joseph is a good man. I like Joseph and I think he's honest and he's trying. But not surprisingly, the scientists that have been placed around him are doing their best to throw out this issue. And at one point during a conference call, I went into a bit of a tirade because I'm tired of their typical response of trying to divert attention from the obvious elephant in the sky. We had a scientist on one conference call that was fishing around trying to see if there were some fireworks show shows a couple months earlier that might have left some residue over Florida. I mean, that is absolutely ridiculous. Talk about looking for a needle and a haystack that has an elephant in it that you're not acknowledging. So again, we see so many in academia, there are behaving with such cowardice and especially the environmentalist community. And I'm all for a clean environment Clayton. I mean, I would live in a TP need a corn if I could live on a healthy planet.
But we see nothing but criminal hypocrisy from the environmental community and the so called climate science community that are absolutely lying about everything. Literally across the board, not just environmental conditions that are actually readings that are being falsified and unfortunately in the wrong direction of what people would like to think. But how can they possibly ignore what's taking place in our skies and pretend that it's just a proposal that could may might be done someday and also Clayton just to just to clear the blurred line between localized publicized cloud seating operations and climate engineering to completely different animals to compare an ant to an elephant. And what media and the power structure is doing is trying to blur that line so people confuse the two. We're talking about the difference between a single engine propeller driven aircraft that might disperse a few dozen pounds of material into the skies. Compare that to a military tanker that can dump something south of a hundred tons of toxic nanoparticles in a single payload. So one's used as a distraction to try to hide the other. Look here. Don't look there.
Yeah, and a fireworks display. Give me a break. I could I went into a complete tirade on the conference call. Maybe that's why I haven't been invited back. But I'm not going to bite my lip. I'm not going to play their game. I'm not going to take the long way around the bar. And we are rapidly running out of time and people don't realize. And even the surfactants in the mix, Satan Clayton, I sent to your producer images of the foaming. Seashore is on the East Coast and we see that in a lot of areas now that's that's surfactants. And there's a factants are in the mix to keep these particles from regulating together to keep them so they don't fall faster. And again, we see these massive seafoam events where literally it's 10 feet thick in places. And we have the so-called climate science community trying to explain that away. And all sorts of different completely false conclusions. And the same thing with Clayton, the frequency transmissions in the sky. You've seen the herringbone patterns before Clayton looks like perfectly symmetrical herring bones in the clouds. Yeah.
Those are frequency transmissions manipulating the now ionized atmosphere. It's electrically conductive now. And that's how they scatter and disperse the particles. And it's not uncommon to see if you have multiple transmitters in an area. You can see frequency transmission. Herringbone patterns going in opposing directions. And they're trying to get the so-called climate science community trying to pretend that that's gravity waves. I've heard one excuse. They don't even know what a gravity wave is. They're literally fishing it for anything they can find to try to explain away things like this. Or the baseball and softball size hail. Same thing from chemical ice nucleation. And now they're trying to find ways of explaining that away that have nothing to do with chemical ice nucleation. And we're under assault right now. All of us weather chemical and biological warfare. And I would argue whatever other cause or concerns people are focused on Clayton. If we can't breathe without sucking this stuff in, we're not going to be firing on their once for much longer if we are already. And we have the bees to coming. We have peer reviewed study on the bees from the aluminum exposure peer reviewed science study.
The study itself cited that the bees and the bees have collapsed by the way we're down to single digit pollinators right now single digit with the in the case of the bees. They're dying of symptoms that resemble Alzheimer's and dementia and a human being they can't even find their way back to the hive. How long do we can't find our way home Clayton? God. And then we have these big storms that are unfolding. Of course, we saw what unfolded in New Jersey. And you know, whenever I see one of these storms. Now I'm immediately thinking of are they manipulating the weather are they manipulate using you know, Harper rays, etc. to push storms a certain way for a certain reasons, certain a fair use reason like we saw in North Carolina or in. In Maui during the wildfires or in California with the wildfires and wind. We're also seeing the hurricane tropical storms that are coming up from through Mexico through New Mexico into Texas. So massive flooding in areas through New Mexico and into Abilene and Lubbock and the Panhandle tornadoes last night in the Panhandle of Texas right now in Colorado for the past three days rain.
We never have this much rain. It's always sunny in Colorado. So it's easy for me to look at that and say something's going on here, but you look at this much more closely. Do you think something is being manipulated with these storms that are sort of criss crossing the US at the moment. There is no natural weather at this point. Absolutely none. If even one major country was to geo and your over its own airspace, that would infect the entire world. And we have countries all over the globe participating this actively or passively. And we know that even during the height of the Cold War, we had Soviet weather mod scientists in the US, US scientists in Russia. They're colluding and cooperating on these programs because of the cross border ramifications. We know the same as true as CB 19. It cannot be otherwise. There is intergovernmental cooperation even between quote otherwise adversarial nations. We have US Senate document to prove that. So in the case of the current hurricanes, we have lots of them in the Pacific and nothing anywhere else. So what it appears they're doing again, we can speculate on the aginism objectives, but the fact that everything we see is tainted with climate engineering operations.
So they're funneling moisture from Pacific storms up into the southwestern US. They're completely squashing everything in the Atlantic, everything. I mean virtually they're not allowing anything to spin. Is that directly related to wanting to make sure that nothing spins up around the Gulf of Mexico oil infrastructure because they protect that. I mean so consistently it's mind numbing. They don't let anything spin up around the oil infrastructure. It's not an accident. It's not nature trying to protect the oil pumping infrastructure and the already dead Gulf of Mexico. They're simply making sure that nothing interferes with that. And then do we plug that into what's happening around the rest of the globe and the cutting off of oil supplies from other countries, allowing the stranglehold that we have on it now here. All of these puzzle pieces connect Clayton, but in the case of the hurricanes, none of this is going to be considered natural. Everything is tainted steered, derailed. And they're not letting anything spin up in the Gulf around the oil infrastructure, but that's not a good thing because there's no ocean mixing going on right now. The ocean is stratifying.
It's deoxygenating. It's super heating. So people that might think, oh, that's a good thing. When you interfere with nature, ultimately you end up with very bad results and we were headed that way at blinding speed. We are people need to wake the hell up. They do. Yeah. No wonder you were angry on that conference call. It's like, oh my god, I'm still angry about thinking about it. Fireworks. The bottom line is Clayton. I mean, if we can't breathe, if we literally if we can't breathe without sucking this stuff in and I would encourage people go out in a dark location. With no light pollution and take the brightest light you can find and shine it straight up into the sky and look straight up through that beam. And you have to see it to believe it. It looks like you're in a blizzard. There's so much particulate matter raining down that you cannot see during the daytime. It looks like you're in a blizzard. These are toxic elements and we're sucking them up with every breath. In fact, we have a recent science study Clayton that states we're sucking up hundreds of millions of particles every single day. In fact, one study stated perhaps 10 million or more nanoparticles in a single breath. None of this is natural. Our bodies can't take that for very long.
It's building up in all of us because these particles are very bioavailable and bio accumulative. So whatever other causes of concerns, people are focused on Clayton. In addition to the weather warfare aspect, this is chemical and biological warfare. If we don't deal with it very soon, all of the causes of concerns will become moot. And this is the crown jewel weapon or the military industrial complex. They already have the dispersion mechanism above us at any point of their choosing. Since we have graphene and polymer fibers already in the mix, they could put something much more lethal in that mix Clayton and we're done overnight anytime they want. If those factor rights here on our chat room says, why does the snow smell like fluoride? Because we've got fluoride in it. We have a public science study that indicates coal fly ash which contains fluoride may be a base material because there's so much of it they want to get rid of it anyway. It's got elements that are listed in climate and during patents. And this is where the equation is very complex and people too many people online try to make it simple.
And that takes away from credibility. So some of these elements being dispersed over the oceans, for example Clayton, are used to what's known as ocean fertilization. That's another form of climate engineering. And some of the elements in the coal fly ash like iron oxide are used for that. It forces analogy bloom forces the ocean to uptake more carbon which acidifies the ocean. It's part of hiding. It's the pharmaceutical industrial approach to the planet. Try to hide it even if you kill the host and doing it. So that deoxygenates that part of the ocean and kills a large section of the ocean. We have 500 dead zones right now that are expanding over 500. So whatever they're smelling in the snow, there's a plethora of toxic elements in the snow. So I don't even want to call it snow Clayton. We have flakes in Northern California in recent years. It's not uncommon when they're chemically nucleating which they're able to do less and less now because things are deteriorating so rapidly. These giant cotton ball looking flakes will fall down. It's nothing like a natural snowflake which we don't see at all anymore and it can be falling at 45 degrees.
How in the hell does this snow at 45 degrees because chemical ice nucleation can accomplish that the patents actually state that listed a geongering watch. So there are chemical ice nucleation is a very profound science. People think water freezes at 32. That's it. That's not true. Clayton, think of the ice pack in your first aid kit that can set him a shelf for 20 years at room temperature and you mix the ice pack together. You have ice instantly right. Yeah, exactly. That's that's endothermic reacting elements. People know what exothermic is. They know what an explosive is. A little tiny bit of explosives can create a huge exothermic reaction. Indothermic materials can do the opposite. It's energy absorbing so they're literally able to create a snow storm with these chemical elements out of what should have been a rain storm at much higher temperatures and it cools a layer of air down that sinks to the surface. In your listeners Clayton, can search Chinese scientists creates snow storm and they'll find everybody covered it all mainstream media covered they did billions of dollars with a damage to Beijing and other cities.
Close roads chemical ice nucleation Fox News CNN Guardian BBC popular side everybody covered everybody but you bring it up here suddenly you're wearing a tinfoil hat. And they like to throw around the Kim trails term all the time and that term is fine for personal conversations but don't use it for talking to media elected officials agency officials because they will immediately plug their ears and one here another word you say we're playing chess. We need to learn how to play well use the science terms and you'll gain much more ground in this fight. Before I let you go you know you talk about breathing I've got some air filters in the house I got some co-ware filters and got them for a few years ago I mean does that doing anything. You know should I. Should I look for a different type of air filter or breathing all these particulates helping my family what do you use it what do you recommend. An eye on tight filter that collects on a grid is the only thing that's going to stop a nanoparticle now many of these particles do regulate so they become larger as they near the surface so some filter mediums can stop them but for example even up to 20 nanometers or much larger than that.
An in 95 mask for example wouldn't even slow it down it's like trying to catch a minute with a tuna net goes right through it and that's why the EPA does not report anything typically below 10 microns Clayton that's that's like again comparing a tune to a minute 10 microns is a boulder compared to a nanoparticle that's what's so dangerous about these nanoparticles a nanoparticle of any element is harmful. But when you're talking about harmful elements on top of that I mean this is going to wreak havoc in all of us it's building up in all of us there's no exceptions everybody we've tested here blood year and are packed with these metals and people can ignore they can pretend it's not there it's not real go out and do that flashlight test in fact we just posted a geo geo wants to work are conducting the same type of test you have to see it to believe it it literally looks like you're in a blizzard and that's all day long when you can't see it and you think the air is fine but it's not. Again these particles are ubiquitous the contamination is ubiquitous and we now know from period study Clayton that every single drop of rain on planet Earth is toxic not just with climate engineering element fallout but with pfs forever chemicals every single drop of rain period study proven.
Oh my god I'm just so furious people need to wake up I mean this is our future this is our planet this is our children's future this is our food supply you know we can we can bitch in moan about you know Elliott page wearing a shirtless photo on Fox news or whatever who the hell cares you know I mean this is the stuff that matters more than anything so we don't stop this from happening we're not there is no future and that's a mathematical statistical certainty you can't continuously. Derail contaminate this incredibly complex web of life without consequence and I'm not saying that this is the only problem Clayton I want to stress that we're not saying that we've been very poor stores of the planet we treated there for unimaginable contempt but this intentional intervention for purposes of power and control there's nothing benevolent about these programs. Again this weather chemical biological warfare crown jewel weapon for controllers they can literally bring populations through their knees slowly degrade and debilitate them with those populations never even knowing their under assault.
The great Dan Wigginton thank you for your tireless work on this really really appreciate it our audience appreciates it we all appreciate it thank you for your patriotism thank you for your heroism thank you for your incredible work thank you Dan. Same back to you Clayton thank you very much for your voice in this battle brother much love thank you Dan great seeing you as always. What do you guys think about that? I feel 40 I mean 45 degrees snow making it snow at 45 degrees yeah just I did have to laugh because somebody said to wear a kimchi mask. Yeah so it was like well Matt no none of that will help like a mask you put a kimchi mask nothing will help. Oh my god we've got to stop this and it's true I mean the thing is like because because you're talking about like something that doesn't exist in nature and so there's no way any living creature has evolved to combat it so you put those nanoparticles in your body and there's like there's nothing in there that can do anything about it we're not designed to do that we can't handle it it's just there's no mechanism at scale too like it's not just a
guy had an accident you know and crashed no it's it's at scale across the United States. Oh my god deeply troubling but thank you to everyone who stayed and enjoyed our discussion there because it's I think it's such an important discussion. Indeed. Hey we have a daily newsletter that yeah thanks Dan very amazing work indeed we have a daily newsletter our teamwork's very hard on writing it and it's totally free and you should download it and it's delivered to your inbox first thing in the morning we really try to cut through the propaganda give you like four or five stories you can read over your cup of coffee. You know first thing in the morning so you can kind of get caught up on what's happening what propaganda they're spinning to you and we try to help you see your way through it. Just go to redacted.inc not dot com it's dot in C and right at the top of the page there's a newsletter button just click that. You'll receive the newsletter you'll receive a welcome email and it'll be delivered to your inbox first thing in the morning.
Just you might go to your spam folder initially season you drag it over to your inbox make sure it's there. Google I think puts us in a dangerous folder they call us dangerous they used to I don't know if we're still considered dangerous or not I know what. What constitutes that I mean maybe you don't consider your side but I still consider us dangerous but yeah. True I mean especially when we're talking about now all these terrible cancers in the awareness about it you know about and you know it's it just kills me like still like you see these signs for like go get your flu shot go get your covid shot you can do them two days and one I'm like how is this still being pushed on the American people how are we still allowing advertising on television for this knowing what we know about it and all the testimony from people like Dr. Pierre Corey and Dr. Peter McCullough and others how is this a being allowed to happen it's so weird being over here in Thailand you don't see that like there are no pharmaceutical ads or anything like nobody's pushing drugs on anybody it's it's it's in most
countries they're allowed do you remember when Oprah had on the the royal couple I forget what the hell that interview was a number of years ago and all these Brits tuned into watch Oprah on CBS I guess and they were tuning into watch American television that which they don't ever do and overwhelmingly online people are like why is every ad in your commercial breaks all for drugs pharmaceuticals like welcome to our world yeah and they'll invent things and tell you that they're in you know are you feeling are you feeling restless legs wait a second I think I do have restless legs all of a sudden what's going on here I remember I got yelled at when I was anchoring good day Philadelphia number of years ago and like restless legs syndrome had just been invented remember that and I called it out on the air I'm like we did the story and then like after the story is like when did like restless legs syndrome become a thing like where's it I feel like they just invented that we got a few people that I called in and were like angry like my legs are restless I have I have one I didn't know I didn't even know it was a thing and then I was when I was in a biology class
I was kind of reading some article and it mentioned as like holy shit that happens to me all the time it is called exploding head syndrome and it it's that's literally the name of it and it's and I have this and what it is it's like maybe like once a month sometimes but it's usually like right when falling asleep it's like all of a sudden there's like an explosion sound like like all the doors in the house slamming at the same time and I like snap a wake but it actually like I actually feel like I was hit in the head and it's it doesn't hurt and it's just really fast it like wakes me up but it's like you know it's just something I've always dealt with I didn't realize it actually hasn't even it's exploding head syndrome but I don't think I would take medication for it and they find out there's only three people on the planet that it's ever happened to but now it's an epidemic like restless legs syndrome is sweeping the nation. Oh my God. I mean that would be a great name for a pandemic the exploding head syndrome. Yeah. Well my my head exploded during the pandemic for other reasons. So many other people's did you know as well just over and over and over.
Oh my God. It's like that head exploding emoji you know. Oh, that's how I felt a few minutes ago in my Philadelphia Phillies pulled out a victory against the Atlanta Braves and the 10th inning. Oh my God. It's football season. Shut up. Not yet. It's not football season yet until until the Phillies are done. So anyway. Thank you guys for hanging out with us today. Thank you for subscribing to the channel. Thank you for turning on those bell notifications. Thank you for being a secret of truth. And that's our goal here. We have no agenda other than finding the truth. And if we are wrong about something and it smacks us in the face, we will come out here and do a whole show and admit it that like if I if I'm suddenly proven wrong that they didn't know about October 7th. That that wasn't one giant big false flag attack and that they absolutely didn't use that as a catalyst in order for the greater Israel project to expand. I will come out and do a full show about it. But that's not going to happen. So anyway, everybody have a great night. Thank you guys so much for dialing us up and subscribing. And we'll see you back here tomorrow at 4 p.m. Eastern time. Have a great night, everyone.
More episodes
More from Redacted News

A Botched Execution—and a Warning About MAID (The Christa Pike Execution)
Redacted News

The COVID Hospital Scandal: Patients and Doctors Speak Out
Redacted News

How the CIA started Disney
Redacted News

America has a SECRET Time Travel Program, This US Army Whistleblower Was Asked T...
Redacted News