
technologyJun 3, 202431:01pending
Episode 204: What Could Have Been for the Bill S-210 Hearings
Get every episode summarized
Each time Law Bytes publishes, we email you a written briefing from the transcript — the topics, who appeared, and any specific claims, with the ad reads skipped.
Email me new episodesFree for 3 shows. No card needed.
About this episode
Bill S-210, the mandated age verification bill for pornography sites that in reality targets everything from Google Search to Netflix, was expected to be the subject of extensive hearings by the Standing Committee on Public Safety and National Security. But after a Conservative filibuster, it appears that there will be only one hearing and that the bill will be reported back to the House unamended. Before that vote, this week’s Law Bytes podcast offers up a “what could have been” hearing on the bill. It features my mock opening statement alongside responses to some of the actual questions raised by MPs on issues such as privacy, website blocking, and poorly defined terms in the bill.
Get every episode summarized
Each time Law Bytes publishes, we email you a written briefing from the transcript — the topics, who appeared, and any specific claims, with the ad reads skipped.
Email me new episodesFree for 3 shows. No card needed.
Hosts & guests
No transcript yet
This episode has not been transcribed. Request it and it moves to the front of the queue.
More episodes
More from Law Bytes

Episode 278: Ben Waldman on Gander Social and the Challenges of Building a Sover...
Law Bytes
Aug 10, 202634:13pending

Episode 277: Kate Robertson on the Risks That Lie Behind Canada's Unexpected Sig...
Law Bytes
Jul 27, 202646:21pending

Episode 276: Information Commissioner Caroline Maynard on Canada’s Access to Inf...
Law Bytes
Jul 20, 202633:44pending

Episode 275: David Loukidelis on Why Stripping Privacy Enforcement from Canada’s...
Law Bytes
Jul 6, 202631:59pending