
Get every episode summarized
Each time Elon Musk Podcast publishes, we email you a written briefing from the transcript — the topics, who appeared, and any specific claims, with the ad reads skipped.
Email me new episodesFree for 3 shows. No card needed.
About this episode
Elon Musk Podcast is made possible by:
“Thinking about refreshing the carpet in your home? For a limited time at the Home Depot, get 10% off installed carpet projects on trusted brands, like Lifeproof, Lifeproof with Petproof Technology, Home Decorator's Collection and Traffic Master.”From the transcript
Artificial intelligence developer Anthropic is preparing for a monumental initial public offering (IPO), aiming to begin formal marketing around November 9 with a target debut before Thanksgiving. The company is pursuing a massive valuation reaching up to $2 trillion, which could make it one of the largest market listings in history. Financial disclosures reveal a complex paradox within the business, highlighted by extraordinary revenue growth alongside billions of dollars in net losses driven by massive infrastructure and compute spending. Furthermore, the firm's regulatory filings unusually caution investors about the inherent long-term dangers associated with its own technology. This landmark market entry is expected to serve as a crucial test for the broader artificial intelligence sector, opening the public window for numerous other tech startups waiting to follow
Get every episode summarized
Each time Elon Musk Podcast publishes, we email you a written briefing from the transcript — the topics, who appeared, and any specific claims, with the ad reads skipped.
Email me new episodesFree for 3 shows. No card needed.
Hosts & guests
Transcript ready
837 searchable segments. Every word is indexed and playable.
Full transcript
Elon Musk Podcast — Anthropic Targets Record $2 Trillion IPO. Machine-transcribed; use the interactive transcript above to jump the player to any line.
Thinking about refreshing the carpet in your home? Now's the time to do it. For a limited time at the Home Depot, get 10% off installed carpet projects on trusted brands, like Lifeproof, Lifeproof with Petproof Technology, Home Decorator's Collection and Traffic Master. Plus, with installation starting at just 49 cents per square foot, upgrading your space is more affordable than ever at the Home Depot. Offer valid September 24th, 2026 through October 4th, 2026. Exclusions apply for licenses, see Home Depot.com slash license numbers. College football is back, so Hilton called to me the superstition concierge to make your fan rituals a reality. Need a room to match your lucky number? We got you. Want to make sure our team doesn't wash your lucky jersey? Oho, that smells lucky. Hilton's unmatched hospitality can keep up with any superstition. Even a marching bandwreck up call it 555 and 55 seconds. Hit it! When you need a team that will do whatever it takes on game day, it matters where you stay. Hilton, for this day.
When you need to build up your team to handle the growing chaos at work, use Indeed Sponsored Jobs. It gives your job post the boost it needs to be seen, and helps reach people with the right skills, certifications, and more. Spend less time searching and more time actually interviewing candidates who check all your boxes. Listeners of this show will get a $75 sponsor job credit at andd.com slash podcast. That's indeed.com slash podcast, terms and conditions apply. Meeta Hyering Hero, this is a job for Indeed Sponsored Jobs. Inthropic, the maker of the Claude Artificial Intelligence Model is targeting evaluation of up to $2 trillion for its initial public offering, selecting NASDAQ with Goldman Sachs, JP Morgan, and Morgan Stanley leading the charge. Yeah, and just getting three investment banks of that size to jointly manage this into kit. I mean, that indicates they are trying to organize an unprecedented volume of capital. You're looking at an alignment of institutional buyers, sovereign wealth funds, and retail brokerages that,
well, you just rarely see that outside of sovereign debt issuances. Right. And they chose NASDAQ, which obviously tracks with traditional high-growth tech listings, but attaching a $2 trillion number to this specific entity, it completely breaks conventional equity pricing models. The raw financial reality from the filings shows an attempt to orchestrate pretty much the most highly valued public market debut in the history of the equity markets. Well, the urgency in the filings is what stands out immediately to me, honestly. They're rushing to execute this listing before an upcoming major market holiday shutdown, which is always a massive variable. Yeah, exactly. Wall Street operates on this very rigid psychological calendar, right? When traders and fund managers step away for holiday periods, liquidity just completely drains from the system. Bankers despise trying to price an offering when the institutional buying desks are unstaffed, or you're running on skeleton crews. Because you need momentum. Right. You need momentum. When the market is running hot, you cannot give portfolio managers a week off
to just sit on their couches, look at the economic data, and reconsider their aggressive risk profiles. You have to build the book of orders and force the market to digest the equity before the holiday forces of pause. And an investment bank's primary job in the scenario is to guarantee the shares are sold. And that means they're constantly gauging the temperature of the largest asset managers if that temperature cools by even a fraction of a degree because of a long weekend, the entire valuation model slips. Yeah, managing a syndicate of this size is basically an exercise in applied psychology as much as corporate finance. The lead underwriters have to, they have to project absolute confidence. They have to signal that the order book is oversubscribed. Right. Like if you don't commit capital right now, you'll be left out of the largest wealth creation vehicle of the decade. Delaying the process disrupts that carefully engineered atmosphere of scarcity. Which leads us to the core problem the market has to solve today, really. How do we price an entity that is simultaneously posting the fastest revenue growth in tech history?
Recording tens of billions in losses and openly warning that its own product could be a danger to humanity. We have mature frameworks for companies selling consumer goods. We even have speculative frameworks for companies with zero revenue promising future technology. But we lack any framework for a company generating billions in real commercial revenue. Burning capital at a rate that would bankrupt a nation and maintaining a legal stance. Thinking about refreshing the carpet in your home, now's the time to do it. For a limited time at the Home Depot, get 10% off installed carpet projects on trusted brands like Lifeproof, Lifeproof with Petproof Technology, Home Decorators Collection and Traffic Master. Plus, with installation starting at just 49 cents per square foot, upgrading your space is more affordable than ever at the Home Depot. Offer valid September 24th, 2026 through October 4th, 2026. Exclusions apply for licenses. See Home Depot.com slash license numbers. College football is back. So Hilton called to me the superstition concierge
to make your fan rituals a reality. Need a room to match your lucky number? We got you. Want to make sure our team doesn't wash your lucky Jersey? Oh, that smells lucky. Hilton's unmatched hospitality can keep up with any superstition. Even a marching bandwick up call it 555 and 55 seconds. Hit it! When you need a team that will do whatever it takes on game day, it matters where you stay. Hilton, for this day. So that their product poses an existential threat to the species building it. Right. The traditional discounted cash flow models just completely fail when applied to these parameters. So we can track how the financial ecosystem got to this point by looking at the company's valuation jumps across its recent private funding rounds. The Ascent is completely detached from historical norms. It started around 61.5 billion and then... It just exploded. It tripled to 183 billion, double to 380 billion, hit 965 billion, and now they're aiming for this $2 trillion target
in the public market. If you're not subscribed yet, take a second and hit follow on whatever podcast app you're using. It helps us keep making this. We appreciate you being here. So looking at those numbers, in traditional venture capital, a company celebrates doubling its valuation after releasing a new product line or expanding into a new international market over several operating quarters. But here, we're observing a mechanism where hundreds of billions of dollars in enterprise value are synthesized in private markets without corresponding shifts in the physical economy. The velocity of capital formation entirely defies the physical constraints of traditional business building. It really does. Now we have to challenge the popular assumption that this kind of velocity inevitably ends in a catastrophic loss for the earlier participants. There's a specific example from the sources regarding a BlackRock fund that purchased roughly $35.75 million in shares when the valuation was sitting at 183 billion. When observers look at the $2 trillion target and declare it a bubble,
they assume a failure to reach that exact target equates to a systemic collapse. Or right, but institutional asset managers operate on a completely different mathematical plane. They secure their positions knowing the headline numbers function primarily as marketing tools to anchor expectations. Their risk models rely entirely on their entry price, not the speculative peak. Yeah, exactly. We can work through the mathematics of that specific BlackRock position to understand the true downside for the institutional class. Imagine the highly anticipated IPO fails to meet expectations. The financial press calls it a disaster and the company stumbles into the public markets at a valuation of just $900 billion. Which would be framed as a colossal failure. Exactly. That is a massive drop from the $2 trillion target. However, because that specific fund entered at the $183 billion mark, they're initial $35.75 million investment scales proportionally to roughly $176 million. There's just a profound disconnect between public perception and private reality here.
If the stock hits the market at $900 billion, headlines will be flooded with commentary about the destruction of a trillion dollars in paper wealth. Retail observers will assume the institutional investors suffered a devastating blow. Yeah, they'll think the big guys got wiped out. Right. But the reality of the accounting shows, the fund still walks away having multiplied its initial capital by a factor of nearly five, securing a gain of over $140 million on a single position. In the context of late-stage private equity, getting burned frequently just means making five times your money instead of the 10 times modeled in your most aggressive projections. The structure of these investments creates a massive buffer for the early participants. Ordinary investors generally do not get the same access or pricing as private capital. The legal framework mandates that only entities with the significant existing capital are allowed to participate in these early rounds. The stated intention is to protect unsophisticated individuals from volatility. But the practical outcome is that the general public
is barred from accessing the highest yielding assets during their most intense periods of growth. The public is only invited to participate once the growth curve has flattened out. Yeah. By the time a prospectus is filed and the retail public is permitted to purchase a single share, the explosive multiples of wealth creation have already been captured behind closed doors. The public is essentially buying the mature, fully priced asset from the people who bought the speculative deeply discounted asset. We have established a two tiered financial system where accredited institutions absorb early volatility in exchange for capturing exponential upside. While the rest of the market waits to purchase the stabilized equity at a premium. And the conversation surrounding who gets the early upside naturally points to the question of who inevitably holds the downside. The early investors hold illiquid private shares. They have immense paper wealth, but they cannot use preferred stock in a private artificial intelligence lab to buy real estate or fund a university endowment.
Right. They require a liquid market to convert those speculative gains into actual currency. That requirement drives the push to take a company of this magnitude into the public sphere. The early syndicate requires an exit. The system demands an exit strategy. The only entity large enough to absorb that volume of early investor equity is the collective capital of the global retail market. The functional purpose of a company going public extends far beyond raising fresh capital for operations. The initial public offering serves as a highly regulated transfer mechanism. It broadens who can own the downside risk while providing that necessary path to liquidity for the early private investors. At the investment banks match the sell orders of the early venture capitalists with the buy orders of mutual funds and retail brokerages. The private wealth converts to cash and the future volatility distributes across the broader population. That transfer mechanism directly impacts you, the listener, whether you actively choose to buy individual text stocks
or not. This newly public risk spreads directly onto ordinary shareholders through the architecture of modern retirement savings. As soon as a company of this immense size enters the public markets, it immediately infiltrates mutual funds, target date retirement accounts, and massive passive index funds. The plumbing of the financial system pretty much ensures that a portion of the broader markets capital is automatically redirected into these newly listed shares. Right. If you have a standard retirement portfolio tracking the broader market, your capital will automatically be used to purchase this equity. The asset managers running those passive funds do not evaluate the balance sheet or read the risk disclosures. No, their mandate requires them to buy the stock simply because it exists in the public index. If a major index waits this company at two or 3% based on its market capitalization, every single time a portion of your paycheck drops into your 401k, a fraction of those dollars mechanically purchases those shares. Your personal financial future becomes tethered
to the performance of this specific infrastructure build, completing the transfer of risk from the private syndicate to the general public. And there is a constant debate within financial circles regarding the ethics of this structure. One argument suggests that this public listing process is the only remaining avenue for wealth distribution in the modern economy. Without the public markets, retail investors would be entirely shut out of technological expansion. Because if these entities remained private indefinitely, the dividends and the long-term appreciation would be permanently locked within the portfolios of venture capital firms and sovereign wealth funds. Right. Pushing these companies onto the public exchanges allows an individual to buy a fractional piece of the future economy, ensuring the returns are not entirely consolidated among the ultra wealthy. But the counter argument observes the irony in how this system actually functions in practice. We are essentially socializing the risk after the rewards have been fully privatized. When evaluation inevitably falls from a staggering peak,
the media declares that the tech billionaires lost half their net worth overnight. But the founders still possess generational wealth, living exactly as they did the day prior, while the actual functional losses are absorbed by the retirement accounts of teachers, firefighters, and office workers. The risk was successfully transferred exactly as designed by the syndicate. Yeah. So for the public to continuously accept this risk transfer, they have to look at the underlying balance sheet to justify the capital allocation. When we examine the leaked financial numbers from the sources we are presented with an almost impossible contradiction. The growth versus the loss. Exactly. On the growth side, the company is demonstrating revenue expanding 12 fold year over year, delivering $4.6 billion in actual realized results. We are also looking at other market estimates pointing to future revenue scaling as high as $65 billion, creating an annualized run rate north of $100 billion. And those revenue figures represent physical dollars being paid by enterprise clients, software developers,
and corporations integrating the intelligence models into their own workflows. The speed at which enterprise budgets are reallocating capital to pay for these specific software services has no historical precedent. Corporations are carving out a completely new category of software expenditure from their global budgets in real time. We are watching companies cancel other software subscriptions, delay hiring, and redirect their operational funds directly into securing compute access. But we must immediately balance that unprecedented growth with a corresponding net loss, which the sources place at $42 billion over the exact same operating structure. $42 billion. I mean, a loss of that magnitude requires a complete recalibration of how will you evaluate corporate efficiency? To lose $42 billion in a single operating period, a company has to actively deploy capital at a rate that defies conventional logistical constraints. They are not losing money due to bloated administrative overhead, poor consumer marketing, or a failure
to find a willing customer base. No, they are losing tens of billions of dollars because the physical costs of manufacturing the intelligence required to generate the $4.6 billion in revenue vastly exceeds the current pricing model. They are subsidizing the compute costs for every single query. Yeah. When a user prompts the model, the electricity and the degradation of the hardware costs significantly more than the user pays for the subscription. They are effectively operating a massive philanthropy program for global enterprise software development, while simultaneously building the most expensive infrastructure project in the history of the private sector. We have to apply the skepticism of normal market pricing to this equation. The fundamental rule of equity markets dictates that all stocks are eventually priced to generate a yield or a profit for the shareholder. If we look at a target valuation of $2 trillion, we have to ask where the mathematical upside exists for the public investor. Right, because a $2 trillion market capitalization already assumes complete monopolistic dominance
of the global software industry. It prices in decades of flawless execution and uninterrupted exponential growth as a baseline expectation. If a company already has a mega cap ceiling priced into its initial offering, the traditional mechanism for stock appreciation disappears. The investor pays a premium for a perfect future that has not yet occurred, leaving absolutely no margin for error, regulatory intervention, or sudden technological disruption. The stock is priced as if the most optimistic projections have already been achieved. You are buying a lottery ticket where the grand prize is exactly what you paid for the ticket in the first place. The risk to reward ratio is entirely skewed against the buyer entering at the peak. We can briefly weave in other market signals from the sources to highlight the deep strangeness of this current economic environment. We are observing traditional, physical, world stalwarts like Nike announcing broad layoffs, citing constrained consumer spending and slowing demand for physical goods. At the exact same time, reports indicate
physical world costs are rising sharply due to diesel fuels record run, squeezing logistics networks and inflating. Thinking about refreshing the carpet in your home, now's the time to do it. For a limited time at the Home Depot, get 10% off installed carpet projects on trusted brands like Lifeproof, Lifeproof with Petproof Technology, Home Decorators Collection and Traffic Master. Plus, with installation starting at just 49 cents per square foot, upgrading your space is more affordable than ever at the Home Depot. Offer valid September 24th, 2026 through October 4th, 2026. Exclusion supply for licenses. See Home Depot.com slash license numbers. College football is back. So Hilton called to me the superstition concierge to make your fan rituals a reality. Need a room to match your lucky number? We got you. Want to make sure our team doesn't wash your lucky jersey? Ooh, that smells lucky. Hilton's unmatched hospitality can keep up with any superstition. Even a marching bandwick up call it 555 and 55 seconds. Hit it! When you need a team that will do whatever it takes
on game day, it matters where you stay. Hilton, for this day. When you need to build up your team to handle the growing chaos at work, use indeed sponsor jobs. It gives your job post the boost it needs to be seen and helps reach people with the right skills, certifications, and more. Spend less time searching and more time actually interviewing candidates who check all your boxes. Listeners of this show will get a $75 sponsor job credit at nnd.com slash podcast. That's nnd.com slash podcast, terms and conditions apply. Need a hiring hero? This is a job for indeed sponsor jobs. The cost of moving anything tangible across the globe. The broader physical economy signals contraction, efficiency measures, and resource scarcity, yet unlimited institutional capital continues to flow without hesitation into a single digital sector. The global financial system is essentially starving the physical world of expansion capital to funnel every available dollar into the development of artificial intelligence infrastructure.
We've created a bifurcated economy. Yeah, tangible goods, apparel, and basic shipping face strict austerity, while digital compute is treated as an infinite resource deserving of infinite investment. And the mechanical reality of losing $42 billion in a single operating period forces us to examine the underlying infrastructure build. We are not talking about abstract accounting losses or non-cash depreciation charges. We are talking about hard currency leaving the treasury to pay for physical objects, land rights, cooling systems, and the staggering energy required to run them. Which leads us directly into the most surprising number contained within the filing. Future spending plans totaling roughly $518 billion. Yeah, the $42 billion loss from the previous period was driven entirely by compute spending. And these forward-looking commitments dwarf that historical burn rate. Half a trillion dollars is a number that is difficult to even contextualize. It roughly equals the gross domestic product
of a medium-sized industrialized nation. Exactly. A single private entity is committing an economy's worth capital toward the acquisition of Silicon processors, long-term data center leasing, and dedicated electricity generation. The sources outline the specific commitments tying the entire industry together into a singular vendor web. We are looking at a $45 billion deal with end-scale, a $35 billion deal with Lambda, and further immense compute agreements with infrastructure providers like Akamai, Technologies, and Fluid Stack. And adding another layer to this complexity, Broadcom is reportedly amassing $60 billion to help anthropic by its own custom design chips. This network of capital commitments reveals exactly where the money flows once it leaves the corporate treasury. It's a closed-loop financial ecosystem. Capital is raised from the public markets and immediately distributed to a highly concentrated network of hardware manufacturers, cloud hosting providers, and semiconductor designers.
Right. The equity raised in the initial public offering acts as a pass-through vehicle to fund the capital expenditures of these specific hardware partners. The company going public is acting as a massive collection plate, gathering retail and institutional capital, and handing it directly to the physical supply chain required to build the data centers. That connects the astronomical numbers back to the fundamental purpose of the public listing. The company is not simply raising money for abstract business growth, clever marketing campaigns, or traditional corporate expansion. They are raising equity on a massive scale to fund physical infrastructure commitments. They have already legally executed. Yeah. The long-term data center leases, the vendor debt, the power purchase agreement, and the share sale form one giant interconnected financing picture. They have contractually obligated themselves to purchase half a trillion dollars worth of computing power. The only mechanism available to settle those future obligations without defaulting is to extract equity capital
from the global retail market. The initial public offering functions as a structural requirement to prevent the entire interconnected web of hardware contracts from collapsing under its own weight. If they fail to secure the capital, the vendors fail to build the data centers and the physical expansion halts immediately. Pouring over half a trillion dollars into an unproven, entirely theoretical intelligence infrastructure forces any rational investor to look very closely at what the creators actually believe the technology will accomplish. You do not commit the equivalent of a sovereign nation's economic output to a project unless you believe the resulting product will fundamentally alter the nature of global commerce and human labor. Right, the sheer total volume of the capital expenditure demands that the intelligence being manufactured is capable of replacing human cognitive function across vast segments of the economy. The hardware commitments represent a physical manifestation of their belief in the software's ultimate capability. They are building an industrial-based design
to absorb the intellectual workload of millions of white-collar professionals. You only build a factory of that size if you intend to manufacture a product that changes everything. That brings us to a highly unusual detail extracted directly from the confidential S1 filing. The company explicitly names the long-term risk of its own product as a factor future investors should weigh heavily before allocating capital. Right, in the mandatory section of the prospectus where companies are legally required to list potential threats to their business model, they have included a disclosure indicating that the continued development of artificial intelligence could pose an existential threat. They are formally warning the financial markets that the product they are building, the very software that justifies the $2 trillion valuation, might result in a scenario where humanity is fundamentally endangered. And this is not a hyperbolic statement made in a podcast interview or a late-night social media post, this represents a legally binding disclosure filed
with the federal securities regulators as part of their formal offering documents. They are documenting the potential for human extinction as a financial liability. We have to evaluate how bizarre this is for a financial prospectus. A standard S1 filing is a carefully sanitized document drafted by teams of corporate lawyers to hedge against mundane liabilities. The companies usually include risk factors regarding currency fluctuations, supply chain disruptions, changing consumer preferences or pending litigation. Yeah, they draft these documents to protect the executives from shareholder lawsuits if the stock price drops due to a misdirting target. They do not normally put a legal disclaimer on the exact product they are selling you, indicating that humans may not be around much longer to enjoy the financial returns. It completely breaks the framework of standard securities law. The legal teams are treating human extinction as just another bullet point in a long list of operational hazards to be quantified, evaluated,
and priced by the open market. It reduces philosophical concerns about the survival of the species to a simple variable and a risk assessment model. It perfectly captures the Silicon Valley paradox. The defining hallmark of technology dreamers over the last decade is that their pitch fully embraces both the extreme utopian promise of their technology and the extreme dystopian peril. Yeah, they present themselves simultaneously as the architects of a flawless technological future and as the only people capable of managing the apocalyptic risks they themselves are creating. By openly acknowledging the existential danger in their regulatory filings, they project an aura of profound responsibility and forward-looking foresight. They do this while continuing to aggressively pursue the exact development path, they claim is highly dangerous. The risk disclosure functions almost as a marketing tool. It signals to investors that the technology is so powerful, so disruptive and so advanced that it threatens the basic fabric of reality. The danger validates the valuation.
I want to direct this specifically to you, the listener. If a company you were about to put your personal retirement money into, formally flagged its own core product as a long-term risk to humanity, does that change your answer as an investor? Or does it just become another line item in your financial diligence? When you look at your portfolio and see the index funds allocating your savings into this equity, does the explicit warning of existential danger alter your perception of risk? Have we become so desensitized to technological hyperbole that the end of the world is priced in as a standard tail risk? The market demonstrates a remarkable ability to commoditize abstract threats. Treating them simply as variables in a discounted cashflow analysis rather than actual physical realities to be avoided. A fund manager will look at the extinction risk way to against the quarterly revenue growth and decided by the stock anyway. Despite this existential warning and despite prominent figures continually banging the drum and warning against the structural risks of the artificial intelligence boom,
the financial machinery simply cannot afford to stop. The source's detail of famous investor from the big short era, repeatedly highlighting the massive infrastructure debt and the speculative nature of the revenue models. The entire ecosystem is moving forward with absolute inertia because the financial consequences of slowing down are immediate and catastrophic. The vendors need to be paid, the leases need to be signed, and the investors demand liquidity. The existential risks remain theoretical and delayed, while a default on a multi-billion dollar compute contract is an immediate, quantifiable disaster. The short-term demand for liquidity entirely overrides long-term philosophical concerns regarding the trajectory of the technology. The machine must be fed. And the entire initial public offering market has essentially been on hold, waiting for this specific listing to clear the pipeline. The investment bankers have deliberately kept the calendar clear, pushing back other companies and ensuring that the market's attention in capital are entirely focused on this single event.
Very few other technology companies have gone public recently because institutional investors are preserving their capital. Right, they are waiting to see how this massive, $2 trillion absorption will impact the broader liquidity pool. The entire apparatus of Wall Street is functioning as a temporary bottle deck. They are holding back the normal flow of public listings to ensure this specific entity has uninterrupted access to the global capital market. It acts similarly to a massive ship moving through a narrow canal. Nothing else can pass until this specific vessel clears the locks. We can view this through the analogy of a race where the track is narrowing. Every major institutional investor, crossover fund and asset manager, wants a guaranteed seat at this specific table before the window of opportunity closes. If this specific deal price as well experiences strong demand and trades positively in the secondary market after the debut, it acts as a gate swinging wide open for the entire queue of infrastructure companies waiting directly behind it.
The end scales, the lambdas, the SB energies, and the countless other entities making up the physical supply chain of this industry will immediately rush to file their own offering documents. The success of this single listing validates the entire half-trillion-dollar expenditure model. It provides the necessary green light for the rest of the ecosystem to extract their own public capital. The market will view a successful debut as proof that the underlying strategy of spending massive amounts of capital on infrastructure is financially sound. We must also play out the reverse scenario, which is what keeps the underwriting syndicates awake at night. If this listing stumbles, if the public markets reject the two-trillion-dollar valuation or if the stock price collapses immediately after the lock-up periods expire, that open window gets incredibly hard to climb through for everyone else. The retail and institutional appetite for artificial intelligence infrastructure will instantly chill. The company's waiting in the queue will find their own valuations severely compressed
and their ability to raise the equity required to fulfill their own hardware contracts will evaporate. It is not merely one single company's faith being decided on the trading floor. An entire sector's capital structure and countless professional careers will be permanently shaped by the outcome of this single market debut. The leverage applied to this specific event is absolute. As we look at the culmination of these mechanics from the private rounds to the index funds, the court take a way is clear. This event is the moment the artificial intelligence infrastructure build and the half trillion dollars of financing underneath it gets priced in the open by the public markets for the first time. We are watching a system where the upside was captured entirely in private. The downside and the massive infrastructure debt is being handed directly to the public. And the product itself comes with a legally mandated warning label about the future of humanity. If you're not subscribed yet, take a second and hit follow on whatever app you're using.
It helps us keep making this. We appreciate you being here. Also check out our YouTube channel for more business and tech updates. There's a link in the description. Nicky Glazer, this stunning tour. The thoughts of death I don't like to dwell on them for longer than like 10 or 15 hours a day. So. November 19, Yamabah Theater. No wonder women rushed to have kids were being trained for it since we were kids. They're like, here's a baby doll. Here's an easy bake oven. I got one of those. I stuck my head in it. I was like, I want out of this narrative. Tickets on sale now at Yamabah Theater.com. Don't miss Nicky Glazer, Yamabah Theater. Fall has never looked or tasted this good. Sweet Greens Fall Harvest Menu is back with seasonal favorites dressed to impress and made to be devoured. Warm roasted sweet potatoes, crisp apples, maple glazed Brussels, and crave worthy flavors in the autumn harvest bowl, maple glazed salmon plate, and roasted bacon Brussels side. The season's most desirable menu
has returned to sweet green. Featuring Fall's best dressed. Make your move. Order on the sweet green app. Fall savings are happening now at the Home Depot. Save up to $500 on select appliances. Plus, enjoy free delivery when you spend $998 or more. From prepping to cooking to cleaning up, Frigidaire has you covered. The custom flex temp drawer switches from fridge to freezer. With more than 15 cooking modes, including Stonebeck Pizza Mode, you can enjoy restaurant quality pizza in as little as two minutes. Then clean up with the Frigidaire dishwasher featuring the industry's fastest normal wash cycle. Shop Fall savings now at the Home Depot. Off the valve, you'll have to wait for us to use only C-Straw Online for details. Your heart can tell you a lot about your health. Apple Watch Series 12 measures your heart rate every five seconds with the most accurate heart rate sensing and awareable. So your vital zap now with heart rate variability can tell you when something is off. And your readiness score can let you know when to rest and when to push. Here's the story in every heartbeat with Apple Watch Series 12. The features described of her wellness purposes only and not for medical use.
iPhone 11 or later require based on Apple conducted study of heart rate accuracy August 2026. Visit apple.com slash Apple Watch Series 12. At Edward Jones, we believe Rich is about taking care of what gives your life meaning. That's why your financial advisor personalizes your plan to help you preserve your progress and create something that lasts. Let's find your Rich. Edward Jones, member SIPC.
More episodes
More from Elon Musk Podcast

Age-Proofing Your Resume
Elon Musk Podcast

Gemini 4 Argon benchmaxxing and government security
Elon Musk Podcast

OpenAI scraps Astra over deceptive behavior
Elon Musk Podcast

Meta's 53 million dollar enterprise AI hire
Elon Musk Podcast