
About this episode
Hour 1 Segment 1
Tony starts the first hour of the show talking about the U.S. hitting a massive ammunition depot in Iran and how it affects gas prices.
Hour 1 Segment 2
Tony talks about the CEO of Air Canada getting set to resign because he didn’t speak enough French.
Hour 1 Segment 3
Tony talks about Jaden Ivey getting waived by the Chicago Bulls for calling NBA’s pride month “unrighteousness”. Tony later gets into a debate about why pride is celebrated for a month while veterans are celebrated for a day.
Hour 1 Segment 4
Tony wraps up the first hour of the show talking about whether veterans care if they are celebrated for a day or for a month.
Hour 2 Segment 1
Tony starts the second hour of the show talking about NASA preparing for the launch of Artemis II tomorrow evening. Tony also talks about a Daily Mail article about how the bullet that assassinated Charlie Kirk didn’t match his suspect's rifle.
Hour 2 Segment 2
Tony talks about his experience filling in for Sean Spicer’s show. Tony also talks about the latest reports about Kristi Noem’s husband living a cross-dressing double life.
Hour 2 Segment 3
Tony gets into three more things: the Providence Mayor Brett Smiley wanting to remove a mural of Iryna Zarutska, Tiger Woods arrested in a DUI crash in Florida, and how more than half of U.S. home listings are stale.
Hour 2 Segment 4
Tony wraps up the second hour of the show talking about Pope Leo saying God rejects prayers who leaders who wage war.
Hour 3 Segment 1
Tony starts the final hour of the show talking about Secretary of War Pete Hegseth on approaching boots on the ground in Iran.
Hour 3 Segment 2
Tony talks about the Supreme Court rejecting Colorado’s law banning conversion therapy for minors.
Hour 3 Segment 3
Tony talks about if spies should be allowed in the U.S. based off student visas.
Hour 3 Segment 4
Tony wraps up another edition of the show talking more about his experience filling in for Sean Spicer’s show.
See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
Get every episode summarized
Each time Tony Katz Today publishes, we email you a written briefing from the transcript — the topics, who appeared, and any specific claims, with the ad reads skipped.
Email me new episodesFree for 3 shows. No card needed.
Hosts & guests
Transcript ready
1,052 searchable segments. Every word is indexed and playable.
Full transcript
Tony Katz Today — Tony Katz Today Full Show - 03/31/26. Machine-transcribed; use the interactive transcript above to jump the player to any line.
Why from the heartland and the crossroads of America, it's Tony Katz today. So we hit a massive ammo depot in Iran. We hit it with a bunker buster. Now we're hearing that we've deployed the B2 bombers over Iran for the first time, which means that Iran has no capacity to know where we are, when we are, or how we are. So we've taken out their air defenses, we can strike at will, they have no navy. Yet they're still a threat. We continue this conversation about the possibility of ground troops and what it could mean.
But what we have more than anything else, what we have is a media that is desperate to make you believe that everything is terrible, awful, just the worst. In real time, we're seeing this take place as opposed to us deciding what we like, what we don't take information and coming up with thoughts. The desperation here is to make the claim, to make the statement that everything is terrible, everything is awful, everything is a failure, everything is a mess. That is simply untrue, Tony Katz, Tony Katz today, good to be here, good to be with you. Allow me to give you an example of this. Now I don't ever think that we should pretend that reality isn't real, we should always
be aware of it. But a number, a data point in a specific moment in time is not reality for forever. So I will give you an example. You are eight years old. If you are eight years old and a and fellow eight year old gives you ice cream, I'm willing to bet you, you rank them very, very high. If another eight year old comes by and punches you in the face, I'm only betting, right? Except for you masochists out there who are like safe words are for babies. You would rank that person, that eight year old very, very low. If the next day the person who gave you ice cream punched you and the person who punched you gave you ice cream, those numbers would criss-cross.
That's what they would do. We are talking about a snapshot in time regarding Trump's approval numbers. This is CNN. Talking as low as Death Valley and this I think is so key here, which is, you know, Johnny B was pointing out, you know, it is sped up now. But this has been a steady fall into the abyss. There is no bottom. Death Valley, that's see, that is how low we are going. And look at this. I think this really just kind of shows it. It is not one event that is dragging Donald Trump down. It's a slow event that have come together and it continuously dropped his net approval ready. Let's talk with a slew of events and who reports on those events. I'm not a tariff guy. Tariffs could have brought you down. Shutdowns, not Trump's fault. Shutdowns could bring you down. A war worth rising gas prices. What's the average right now producer Landon?
The average gas price across the country? Absolutely can bring you down. I don't disagree that these numbers could bring you down. His approval could be down from plus six when he got inaugurated to negative 18 today. I ask you the following question. You don't think Trump is aware that actions he takes while they're in the process could have a negative effect on approval? You don't think anybody doesn't understand this? Do we actually think that this is reality? If gas prices today started going down and in two weeks from now they were at $2.96 a gallon. His approval rating would still be ten below? My point to you is every single thing you look at is predicated on the idea from cable news and others that everything has come to an earth shattering destruction and Trump
has failed. We talk about how they take a look at the actual maneuvers there by the U.S. military. What's happening? They'll tell you it's lost. They'll tell you it's over. They'll tell you it's done. They'll tell you it's gone. No part of that is true. It's been four weeks ladies and gentlemen. Now you and I could have a disagreement on whether or not we should have taken out the regime in Iran. That would be what rational people do. You know what we would do? We would take a look at data and we would take a look at our own thoughts and viewpoints and we would express these things. That isn't what's happening. What's happening is every single part of this to the political left has no purpose. Why? Not because they have data points but because they have a mantra. And the mantra is hate Trump and you see it in everything they do.
Notice I do not start off with you have to love what happened. I don't believe this. I don't believe this and I don't say this at all or in any way. You absolutely do not have to love. What has happened? Why would I tell you that you have to love it? Why would I tell you that you have to have it? Why would I tell you you have to vote for it? My God, you're grown up, make up your own mind. They go the other direction. You have to agree with them because they do not provide you the other side of the story. They don't provide you the other side of the story. They don't provide you the other things. The other pieces of data. They will share with you that Iran was not an imminent threat to us. Do you know how woke right Tucker Puppet Foolish you have to be to buy into that? Every time they engage in a terrorist attack, every time they funded a terrorist organization,
they were a threat to us. We know what we already knew that this guy who ran his truck filled with explosives into a synagogue in Michigan to kill the Jews there was inspired by Hezbollah. We know this to be factual. Now they want to be clear about something as they tell the story that they're not saying this guy was trained by Hezbollah. Oh, no, no, no, just that he was inspired by Hezbollah. It makes no legal difference. If the current leader of Hezbollah himself, Naim Kasem called this man and told him to attack Temple Israel or whether he simply heated Hezbollah's call to kill Jews and in his words, burn their world. Let's bring in MS now justice and intelligence. I don't need to bring in anybody else. He wasn't trained by Hezbollah.
He was inspired by Hezbollah. That's enough for me. Hezbollah is funded by Iran. I'm done here and I'm done with the people who want to tell me that Iran wasn't an imminent threat. Well, Tony, this wouldn't have happened if the US didn't attack. The US didn't attack Hezbollah, the US attacked Iran, Israel attacked Hezbollah. Don't tell me it wouldn't have happened. Well, then it's all Israel's fault. What kind of nonsense stupidity are we discussing here? How many ways must you move and maneuver until you look at reality? I swear in this situation with the woke right, it turns out I'm playing the part of John Galt. Don't you get that it's over? Don't you get that this is the way it is that if you allow terrorists to reign supreme, they will engage in terrorism. You keep wanting the issue to be Israel. You keep wanting the issue to be the US. The issue is a terrorist regime of Islamists who believe in worldwide domination and the
destruction of Western civilization. When will you just be honest with yourselves, woke right? When will they learn? And until they learn, why are they so willing to put us in the absolute face of the harm? Why are they so desperate, so absolutely desperate to not believe what is real and what is happening and what has happened? Why is the political left so unwilling to discuss the violent nature of the Iranian regime, the terrorist nature of the Iranian regime and the abuse of the people? Now I would agree with you that just because the regime is abusing the people isn't necessarily the reason for us to go in because if that was the case, we'd be going into a lot of nations. But the other things are the reason. And one of the additional bonuses is that we get to keep these people from being abused.
32,000 protesters killed? 32,000. We've now denying that that number is real, okay? What number works? Or will you only believe a number of woke right and political left if it comes from the Gaza Health Ministry? Oh, when the Gaza Health Ministry says it, well, then it's real. It's never real. That's Hamas. The people who buy into that are frauds. At what moment? What moment do we understand that the threat has always been there since 1979? And we have not done anything about it to end it. So when you tell me about polling numbers and you say to me, my gosh, things are so bad for Donald Trump. And oh, my gosh, he's fallen into the abyss says, says, Harriet and the Dead Sea from
plus six to 18 under. That's a 24-point drop. Can I ask a question? A question for the Megan Kelly said. I have this, this, this data point here. Let me, let me show this to you. It shows plus six in January of 2025. It shows three below in April. It shows seven below in July. He was already 13 points under, no, sorry, 16 points under, 16 points under where he was when he was elected. How do you think that happened in seven months? Or a non-stop stream of media saying Trump evil? You take that non-stop stream and you add that to the low propensity voter who once Trump got elected because they thought, well, that would be cool. You know, the Joe Rogan set.
And those people went by the way saying, all right, we don't pay any attention anymore. Is anybody surprised? We already see in the numbers look at them. The steady erosion, because Trump's so terrible, or because everybody was told Trump was so terrible and not one conversation was had amongst the ABC, NBC, CBS, CNN, MS now set. Between the New York Times, Washington Post said, let's not think that they still don't have tremendous power, that you give people enough of that negativity and what you'll get is negativity. My point to you is not that you can't disagree with Trump and this action in Iran, of course you can. Where friends will agree, will disagree, but we're going to do it based on the data and we're going to do it based on the actual issues.
Our problem is that the media is not interested in data and our actual issues. They're interested in narrative and they do not care how they pummel you with it and you are watching it in real time and you are watching people fall for it in real time. Polling shows us that amongst Republicans and amongst Americans, with a favor ending the Iranian regime. I think polling would look differently three months from now if we were still in it. Polling might look differently if we have troops on the ground, although we still have not defined what the bloody heck troops on the ground actually is. But unless we're debating all of it, the totality of it, well, if we're not doing that, then we're not providing a service and I put forth to you that these media folks who keep telling us how good and decent they are journalists don't take a side.
Yes you do. Turns out the only honest guys who are in radio, I'm going to get emails for that, I'm going to get emails, send your emails to Clay and Buck at Yahoo.com. We want to compare, we want to compare a radio to television, I put forth to you that more radio hosts are giving the full picture of what's going on in Iran, the positives and negatives, the full picture of what's going on politically with Trump, then television. I don't think there's any question, what do you want to bet? Radio more trusted source of where the information is honest than TV, 10,000 percent. But our reach is not as great sadly, and people are falling for it. And these numbers that Harry Enten wants to share here, I don't deny that he has the numbers, I deny what they mean.
Gas prices go down to $2.96, well, those numbers for Trump are going to go back up and it's not going to stop the press from continuing their daily assault. I'm Tony Katz and this is Tony Katz today. The CEO from Air Canada will step down and the reason the CEO from Canada is going to step down is because he doesn't speak enough French. I cannot make this up, Tony Katz, Tony Katz today, so Air Canada was involved in this crash at LaGuardia Airport, horrifying, horrifying, sorry, the amount of mistakes, at least from the initial reporting, that took place in order for this plane that's landing to hit the fire truck that's crossing the curving and who is communicating with whom and just madness.
The CEO of Air Canada, his name is Michael Russo, he's been with the company for 20 years and he's stepping down and they're going to evaluate successors and the qualifications will include the ability to communicate in French so he puts out a condolence message regarding these two pilots who were killed in this crash at LaGuardia and Air Canada as a Montreal-based airline Quebec, you have to speak both languages and you have to serve customers in both languages. But in his statement, he offers Bonjour and he offers Mercy and that's it. That is the only French that he discusses, the only French he mentions in the statement
and the people of France so outrageously, I'm sorry, the people of Canada, what's the difference? So outrageously up and arms about this thing that he has to step down. According to Prime Minister Mark Carning, the message showed a lack of judgment, then you had one of the leaders of Quebec, the political scene, said it showed a quote, sad and gross lack of respect. And the premier, Francois Legault, called for Russo's resignation. That is unique, that cost him his job. Two pilots are dead, you didn't speak enough French.
The two dead pilots didn't cost him his job. Sorry, I'm not even saying they should have, I'm just saying there's a lot of bad optics here. And if you think it's solely on the CEO to Quebec and to the Prime Minister, you might want to look at yourselves, wow. Let us talk Pope Leo and let us talk Jayden Ivy, not really connected, but I'll hit him both. Keep it here, I'm Tony Katz and this is Tony Katz today. The question is not whether you agree with Jayden Ivy. The question is whether what he said is allowed. Tony Katz, Tony Katz today. It's good to be here, good to be with you.
This is a guard for the Chicago Bulls, except he was and he got waived from the team. He was waived for Conduct Detrimental because he had a video where he granted, that's the term ESPN uses, about religion and had anti-gay sentiments. He was discussing Pride Month and saying that it is unrighteous, that it celebrates unrighteousness. Now I cannot tell you of Pride Month celebrates unrighteousness. I will tell you that a month for gay pride but only a day for veterans is a messed up conversation altogether. I said it, I'm not apologizing to anyone. And part of the reason I'm not apologizing is because all of this has become political. Pride Month is political. The gay pride flag flag is political.
The gay pride flag is of course a political tool. How do I know this? Because it used to be a rainbow and now it looks like a box of Crayolas threw up and I'm not talking about the small box of eight that you get because you know the teacher feels bad for you. I'm talking about the big-ass box of 128 that has the sharpener in it. Just puked all over a bit of cotton and then all of a sudden someone said, here's our new flag. It's got the stripes and then it's got the chevron and then there's a circle in there. I'm pretty sure on the corner there's an oomline. Nobody knows what the flag is for, what it means, what the colors are. It is just a symbol of your political preference and that is all. The gay who wants to disagree with me, eight three three got Tony, eight three three four six eight eight six six nine. But let me start with a rare spot for me to start in a true spot of defiance. I'm right you're wrong. Now that's a really offensive thing to say because you're saying that you're right and
they're wrong except I am. Time and time and time again we see this to be the case. The flying of the flag is nothing more than a signalling of your political direction. Oh, also a shield to please don't destroy this piss. We saw that with BLM and flags. We have seen this with a host of things, oh you have to fly the certain flag, oh you have to make a certain statement, oh you have to post a certain signage. And if you don't post a signage, well then we go after you. If you don't bend the knee, then we go after you, time and again and again and again and again. We have seen this. So when I say I'm right and you're wrong, I don't just say it to say it. Even though I could, I say it with data behind me. But if you want to argue that the game pride flag is somehow not a political symbol, a 33 got Tony. The chatroom is open youtube.com slash Tony cats come join the live stream and of course on the twitter ex at Tony cats email me Tony at Tony cats calm.
Let's go to work here. Jaden IV stated the world proclaims LGBTQ right? They proclaim pride month and the NBA does too. They show it to the world. They say come join us for pride month to celebrate unrighteousness. They proclaim it on the billboards. They proclaim it on the streets unrighteousness. Now do you get fired for that? The answer is I don't actually know. What is in a contract that Jaden IV signed? What did Jaden IV agree to? To what he can and cannot say as an employee of the bulls? We should be clear that even my contract has clauses regarding things said conduct
detrimental. So for example, I am allowed to lampoon, I am allowed to speak directly in response to what someone said, that doesn't mean I could defame, not in the slightest. There is no question in my mind that if my employer thought that my conduct was detrimental, they could relieve me in my duties. Now it's weirder in talk radio because our jobs talk about these things. And so if I'm discussing the thing that's being discussed, it would be kind of hard to relieve me in my duties because I'm discussing what is indeed news and what it is a news worthy story. I don't know if indeed it is conduct detrimental. But let's say that it is. Now the question would have to be what statements are indeed detrimental and what statements
aren't. So we have here this statement, the world proclaims LGBTQ, right? This is what he said. I'm quoting it. The world proclaims LGBTQ, right? They proclaim Pride Month and the NBA does too. They show it to the world. They say come join us for Pride Month to celebrate unrighteousness. They proclaim it on billboards. They proclaim it on the streets, unrighteousness. Now what if, right, we're going to play this game. I'm not really a fan of these games, but just as an idea. They're saying that this was the bridge too far. What if he said this? The world proclaims Trump, right? They proclaim Trump Month and the NBA does too. They show it to the world. They say come join us for Trump Month to celebrate unrighteousness. They proclaim it on the billboards. They proclaim it on the streets, unrighteousness. Would he be fired? Now I use Trump Month because I picked a thing that would get people the most inflamed.
Shock, jock, Tony Katz. Pew, pew, pew, finger guns, pew, pew, pew. You can pick something else. You can pick any topic you want and see if it fits. The question for us is, how is it detrimental to the team? Now Greg commenting said just like TV, the bulls should say the views expressed by, name the person, are not necessarily the views of the NBA or the Chicago Bulls. They just wanted him canceled. When Steve Kerr, the coach in Golden State, when Greg Popovich, former coach of the San Antonio Spurs, go on their anti-gun, anti-conservative rants. How come those comments aren't detrimental to the team? When LeBron James goes after the N General Manager, Darryl Morey, because Darryl Morey had
the audacity to stand up for Hong Kongers, and there was LeBron James to say, oh, I get paid by China, that Darryl Morey, well, I believe went to MIT. He needs to educate himself. How about Conduct Detrimental to the whole NBA? Because you guys sold out for that sweet, sweet China cash. How gross. Not everybody. But LeBron, and by the way, if you say something about LeBron, he doesn't say Conduct Detrimental. People just immediately fall to the floor, grab his knee, and say, you hurt me. Not apologizing. Not apologizing for facts, son, no. If J-NI-V has found the light, as he might call it, he stated, I'm not the J-I, I'm not the J-I used to be, the old J-I is dead, I'm alive in Christ no matter what the basketball
setting is. I'm not here to tell him, no, you go, you go do what you do, you go be what you be. You got to go do that. By the way, producer land of NBA is calling, you got to let me know. Be sure to watch the phones, 833 got Tony. But if this is the thing that is detrimental, and we're now making a statement that it's detrimental, well then, isn't the NBA, or at least the Chicago Bulls, aren't they saying shut up and dribble? I put forth to you that this is the NBA saying shut up and dribble. I'm a guy who has always been opposed to shut up and dribble, absolutely opposed to
it. Just because you're an athlete doesn't mean that you can't have an opinion. Now, you're not allowed to have your opinion not be questioned, not be discussed, and not be broken down, it possibly ridiculed. You put yourself in this public sphere, kitten words are going to be spoken. But you don't have to just play the game, you can say what you will. You're grown up. The NBA just said not to fast. So now, the question is, if that's the case, well what else do we apply it to? You mean we only apply it to pride month? Is that it? We only apply it if you're talking about the political movement that is LGBT, specifically the T, which the LGBT should leave immediately. You don't want to be part of that?
These abusers of children, as I see it? No, no, no, no, no. You're getting hoes if you're part of the LGBT or the B. For sure. Now, let me go to Robert on the phone, something in the live stream won't be able to hear this, but don't worry, we'll get to it. Because what I said is, is that for what reason, should we have a gay pride month and not a month for veterans, day for day for gay pride, a month for veterans, I'm there for that. The other way, maybe I think that's a problem. Who decided it was a month? Anyway, Robert, welcome to the show, I appreciate you calling in. What's up, Robert? Hey, Tony, so you were saying that veterans don't have a month, they only have a day, but if you could quickly Google what month is for veterans, you'll see that November is
dedicated to veterans, not just November 11th, but the entire month of November is dedicated to veterans and military families. I would think that that's great if that's a case, I'll gladly check it. I think the greater argument would be, we do call it veterans day, we do call it pride month. Well, yeah, but if you were actually a veteran, if you had family that served in the military and celebrated a veteran's month, you would understand that veterans do have a month, and all it takes is a quick Google search flip that up instead of it's being hateful rhetoric. No hateful rhetoric was viewed. We call it veterans day, we call it pride month, I don't think I said anything wrong. You were saying that trans people abuse children when in fact a majority of child abuse in the sense of beliefs comes from the state, quite clearly, Robert. Quite clearly that the abuse of children, pushing them towards transgenderism, giving them puberty blockers, what we just saw a Supreme Court decision where Katani Brown Jackson's
dissent is madness, where they didn't want health experts in Colorado to be able to tell young boys, no, you're a boy and not a girl, and that's okay. That is all child abuse, and I'm glad the Supreme Court acted the way they did. Ice viewed nothing hateful, the people who want to push children into transgenderism are absolutely child abusers. Period, I apologize for no part of that, but I do appreciate the call and I will double check that on veterans month, but my point still stands. Let's call it veterans month though, I'm all up for that, happy to, for sure, I appreciate the call. More ahead I'm Tony Katz, this is Tony Katz today. So sometimes you learn something, and what I learned is that I was not aware that maybe I had touched on something that others have been thinking about and been bothered by. I thought my comments were mostly benign, if we have a gay pride month, we only have
a veteran's day, I would reverse it. Although I don't know if I want a lot of these things that get celebrated, it's just way too much stuff to celebrate, Tony Katz, Tony Katz today, good to be with you, and I had somebody disagree with me, and Robert called in and said, well, if you knew anything about veterans, you know we'd have a month in November, veterans month, my point was of course nobody celebrates it as a month, celebrates it as a veteran's day, we don't celebrate it as a month, as opposed to gay pride month, which is celebrated as a month, and I had somebody on the Twitter X note that there's no month of parades or discounts or media outlets supporting us, no one supports veterans like that. Then I got a call from John, a veteran, who's like no one calls November, veterans month, that guy who called was definitely not a veteran, I can guarantee you that, thank you for standing
up for us with no voice, or the ones that yells at all the blanking trees, I don't even know what that means, but I'm, so now I'm hearing something very different, and I don't probably be able to get to it on the show, am I learning for the first time that veterans are actually bothered by this, or am I hearing veterans correctly, that they don't care but today, a week or a month, but for the love of God, would you stop pretending like we get enough and everybody else deserves more? Now maybe I'm taking it wrong, maybe I'm hearing it wrong, but these were really quick on responses, like to an extent visceral, I'm curious about this, I'm curious about how
they see it, did I inadvertently, unbeknownst to me, although it could be a conversation out there, and I was just never around it, like is this something that gets discussed, or is it, hey, we're veterans, we don't care about that stuff, but dear Lord, if someone's gonna tell us how somehow they're not getting enough coverage or enough respect, we're gonna tell them to sit down and shut up, I'm curious, I could be complete, I could just be these two and that's it, but it's not just these two, I don't think, meanwhile we'll get to the poke stuff, we will get to the straw poll and what they're saying about Charlie Curt, I'm Tony Katz, live from the heartland and the crossroads of America, it's Tony Katz today, I did myself and just coming from the firing room just a little bit ago on my
way over here, talked to a bunch of members of the team and I'll say normally when we're in the firing room working over there, folks that got their heads down and they're working doing all the business that we do of the space business, but I'll say there was a lot of smiles today, so felt really good about that as the team is preparing, I think everybody's pretty excited and understands the significance of this launch. We did talk to the flight crew last night, we had a briefing with them, we had another one just a little bit before I went down to the firing room, we had another briefing with them last night was just to kind of go over the day launch routine with them and kind of a refresher for ourselves and for them and that went really well, they were in great spirits and then we had another briefing today just to talk about how the launch countdown was going and as we'll talk here in a little bit, it's been going really well. Artemis too, we're talking about the fly by of the moon that is scheduled for well April 1st, which is a terrible day to do, who does a flight on the April fools day?
That is just, that is not the timing I would have gone for, but then again I'm not in charge of timing for NASA, Tony Katz, Tony Katz today an absolute pleasure guys, good to be with you, it's a 10 day mission and Artemis is about getting back to the moon, this is the first time since the Apollo program. What is the point here? Well the point is something that just a good amount of thinking has brought us to and that is if the plan is Mars, right? If the plan is to get some Mars, an exploration of Mars, how does that happen and what has been clearly understood is that it would be easier if you were launching from the moon.
First, you have a little bit of distance, but really what you get is the benefit of a lack of atmosphere and a lack of gravity, not a total lack of gravity, but a great lack of gravity. If you're talking about launching, I don't claim an expertise, I do claim an understanding that I get the mouth. If you are talking about launching from Earth, you have to overcome this gravity with a tremendous amount of force and fuel and now you got to take a flight to Mars, which is not an easy thing to do by the way, I still argue large levels of impossible. If you're doing it from the moon, you have some distance, you don't have to cover, right? You're not halfway there by any stretch, but you got some distance, you don't have to cover and man, is it a lot easier to punch through whatever atmosphere may minutely exist, allowing you more opportunity, more fuel, et cetera to get to where you're going.
That is as layman as I can get. That's really as layman as I can understand it. What you have, so if the question is, is the moon a hub for Mars? The moon is a hub for a lot of things, but yes, that is a strong possibility and that's where a lot of these conversations are now. I think it's fascinating. I will tell you that the moon or NASA is one of the, it might be the only thing left where I say, I know government shouldn't be in this business per say, I know that government shouldn't spend its money like this. I don't care, do it, I think it's awesome. The level of hypocrite, you can call me on this subject, goes from now until the end of time I accept. I accept, I get what I'm doing, I get what I'm saying, I understand completely and
totally. It's true. It's true. Yet it's awesome. I think there is something to it. I think there's something you can call it romantic. I just think of, of look at what our fellow human beings thought of as possible and then did. It's why SpaceX is so unbelievable. These people who hate Elon Musk and call him dumb, screw them. Morons, morons, embarrassing, pathetic, low people. It's amazing. It is all spectacular. Spectacular and terrific. I just want to see more of it. I just want to see more of it. That's all. Love it. What I'd like to see less of is this absolute nonsense garbage that the Daily Mail just put out about Charlie Kirk.
This is truly, truly disgusting. What they posted over there at the Daily Mail reads, bullet used to kill Charlie Kirk did not match rifle allegedly used by suspect Tyler Robinson. New court filing claims. Well, that's something that's not what actually happened. It is an incendiary, disgusting, horrifying headline. So it was a conspiracy. So Candace Owens was right. Hey, let me click on this story to get more. It is beyond a misleading headline. It's a lie.
Because when we take a look at what it is they found during autopsy, they state that the result of the comparison was inconclusive. Somehow the defense trying to mount the defense test wants to make a claim that this proves that it wasn't Tyler Robinson. No, it doesn't. ATF ran as is been reported and analysis on the bullet jacket fragment recovered from Charlie's autopsy. The result was inconclusive, not no match. Those are two different things. Now people who play in that world might be able to give me a little more data and a little more explanation. The jacket was too fragmented to compare, which also partially explains the lack of an exit wound.
Incinclusive means insufficient evidence to draw any conclusion. It does not mean that the bullet did not match the rifle as the headline stated, the false inflammatory, let me get some clicks headline. So now what the defense is saying is that they want this to be exculpatory. Right? Exculpatory to clear someone of guilt. But that's not what this data does. That's not what this data can do. Not by any stretch. There are other testings that could take place. And the defense doesn't want those tests because they want to be able to rest on something inconclusive. Lie about what it is and help their clients who seems to have murdered Charlie Kirk.
It is beyond, beyond ugly. What it is that the Daily Mail has done here. The defense is questioning how the bullet gets matched. They're trying to defend their client. And what you want is to say, hey, click here. I mean, I understand that that clicks are, are, you know, how do I clean this up? Clicks are a prostitute's game. Honestly, that's the best I could do to clear it off. I swear to you. But this is dirty. This is dirty and obscene. And that's what that seems to be where we're at right now.
We're in the dirty kind of play. And people find with it, solid with it. They think that it's somehow acceptable. What part of this would be acceptable? And no one's going to stop reading the Daily Mail tomorrow. What's going to happen is it's going to get quoted. It's going to get used. It's going to get utilized. Bloody heck, even I will sometimes still use a CNN story as a source. I know that CNN is full of garbage. I'm fully aware that these people can't be trusted. But they do have one or two people left who can go about doing some reporting. Oh, my God, there's still some reporters of the New York Times, you know, it's just that the New York Times can't be trusted. It's, it is just flat out horrifying that this would happen.
But I guess not surprising. So with that, when you read that headline, know how nonsense it is, know how shameful it is, and know that no, it's not what it claims to be. Right now Tyler Robinson is the main suspect. He has the right to a defense. Bring him on the trial. I'm Tony Katz and this is Tony Katz today. Tonight, on the first, you're truly filling in for Sean Spicer on the Sean Spicer show. That's right. I hosted. I think it's my first television show hosting. Like, like, yeah, I think it is. I appeared on a lot of TV. But as a host, I think it's my first. I don't know. I didn't curse. I didn't curse and I did not make fun of anybody's mother.
Although there was a really interesting Tiger Woods joke. There was an interesting Tiger Woods joke in there, but you'll have to catch that on the first. I will also be on the Sean Spicer YouTube channel. Yeah, Sean Spicer, the former press secretary, attempting with the stars. Sean Spicer. Very nice guys. Been outrageously kind to me and I greatly appreciate it and I got the call last night if I was available to fill in. And so I hope he's feeling well. And the answer was yes. Happy to do it thrilled to have the opportunity. So look for that. And then I am scheduled on Newsmax tonight at 630. So that's happening as well. If you missed any of this, you caught the podcast, you get the show late. Don't worry. I'll have it all up on the social. So you'll be able to see everything and I appreciate the support in all of those ways. I do want to get into a Tiger Woods conversation. I do. I should. I should. But I wanted to continue
and I had the story for you and it is alluding me right now. It wasn't an answer, although there was a story that came over that things are moving in the straight-up or moves. No, no, no. The story was about Christy Nome's husband. I don't know what's real and what's not. I don't know what it is that's going on with her and not everything is her fault. She surrounds herself with some people who are great and then there are some things that who would know. I guess I am sometimes at a loss as to how odd people are. Now I've said this before, I'll say it again and I'm correct here. Everybody has a fetish.
Absolutely, positively, everybody has a fetish. Some are totally innocent. Some are indeed sexual. Some could be seen as dangerous. Some are against the law. The rock climber is a fetishist. So is the masochist. Just a different fetish. I don't think every fetish is bad for you, but we should be clear that everybody's got the thing that moves them. I may not understand some of the things that move people. In the same way, other people are like, what do you mean you're attracted to feet? I'm not talking about me. I'm talking about other people. I am not a foot guy. I just don't think feet are the end of the universe. Some people are like feet is the
human body should stop at the ankle. That's it. I like those people are like awkward because they're just so visceral with their hate. Some people are really in defeat. Right? Some people are the Dick Morris types. Who am I to judge? I don't. Go live your life. Go find the person who's also in defeat. Knock yourself out. Just please don't tell me about it. Don't show me. No. Thank you. This brings us to a story about Christy Knowham's husband. This is nutty. Now this was initially reported by the Daily Mail. The same people who reported this Charlie Kirk nonsense. And the story says, Ms. Knowham is devastated. The family was blindsided
by this and they asked for privacy and prayers at this time. What in the world is this all about? What this is all about is that allegedly her husband leads a cross dressing double life. I don't know what in the world I'm supposed to say to this. And they're supposedly photos out there. And dressing up and though I have no idea. And yes, I heard there are pictures out there. I am not searching for them. If only because I would like to sleep tonight. It is not my thing.
I do not look at this man and say what you have done is horrifying. If it moves you and it moves other people, I don't get involved. I don't. I don't judge it. Whatever. As long as you're not hurting other people, go live your life. But how is this? What's the right word? I was going to ask how is this possible? Maybe what I'm trying to ask is how is it possible that amongst those who are in leadership, those who are in the know, these things happen with a level of seeming prevalence. With all due respect, you could tell me how Nancy Pelosi's husband was attacked by a random guy with a hammer. And I'll tell you, sure he was, wink wink, nudge nudge, say no more. Everybody has a fetish.
You're telling me that Kristinaum didn't know. And then she found out because it was on the website. You say what you will. You say what you will about Kristinaum and some of it I can agree with you. That's awful. That is awful. If indeed, Kristinaum didn't know. Human history doesn't change. The human condition doesn't change. They like what they like and some of it's legal and some of it's not. This is Tony Katz today. Three more things. Tony Katz. Tony Katz today. Guys, an absolute pleasure to be with you. What is
three more things? These are things that people should be talking about on the front pages. But because of other news stories, not easy to do. Things get knocked off those front pages all the time. So I make sure that we discuss them right here. First, I take you to Rhode Island. I'm pretty sure Landon, I know you just sent me that story, but I had that story, that insanity. I appreciate you, though, where an artist put up a mural. It was paid for by Elon Musk. And it honors Arena Zorutzka. Who's Arena Zorutzka? She was the Ukrainian woman, murdered in North Carolina. She's on a light rail. She's just sitting there, minding her on business. This man, black man behind her, pulls out a knife, starts stabbing her. She looks up at him. I don't even know if she's realized how hurt she was.
Scared out of her mind, nobody helps her. Nobody gets out of a seat. He walks off the train. He's literally saying, got that white girl. And she slowly bleeds out. And the video camera, the videos that are there show her just dying right in front of you. This child. 20 something was, was Arena Zorutzka? 23, thank you. And oh, media doesn't want to talk about this. Media doesn't want to talk about this. Jade and Ivey, oh, we have to talk about him because look how he insulted gay people. This woman got stabbed to death. That guy has an opinion. You don't have to agree with his opinion. But we aren't going to discuss those on the streets who've been convicted and charged with all sorts of crimes being put back out on the streets. We're not going to say, hey, let's not do that. Jade and Ivey can't say something against a pride month because if he does, he gets thrown off the team.
I can't get the left to notice when women are being stabbed to death, they don't seem to care. That's some messed up priorities right there. That's messed up stuff. We're not going to fall for that. Musk is hiring basically a mural to be painted. The mural is not done in downtown Providence and the mayor wants the artwork taken down and says, and I've got the quote right here, the mayor states his name is Brecht Smiley. Can't make that up. The murder of the individual depicted in this mural was a devastating tragedy, but the misguided, isolating intent of those funding murals like the one across the county is divisive and does not represent Providence. What is divisive about a painting of
arenas of Ritska? What's divisive? She was murdered and Elon Musk thinks people should remember her face and her name and what happened to her and we should as society say, we don't want this and we're sick and tired of prosecutors and don't prosecute. We're sick and tired of prosecutors who think that career criminals should get off, but if you say something wrong, if you just spend 100 years in jail, Jayden Ivy says, I don't believe in Pride Month, I think it's unrighteous, lose a job, murder of murders, criminal engages in criminal activity. Why are you paying attention? You better believe we should play in the culture wars and we should win because they have to lose. This doesn't match who we are and then there's, this is not the mayor, but this is a representative
of the area saying that this mural, it doesn't represent Providence values. Ultimately, we want to make sure that every community member that calls Providence home feels safe and we can both agree that this mural behind us does not reflect Providence values nor does it reflect the creativity that we want to see in our city ultimately. What are you talking about? What values does Providence have? Now we know it's Rhode Island, we know it's already a pretty screwed up place. We know what it is. We understand this left is hotbed, hotbed, that it has always been. What are you talking about? How does this not represent your values? It's a painting. It's a painting of a girl's face. How does it not represent your values? Yo, you don't want to be reminded that she was murdered, that policies, that maybe you favor representative, allow these career criminals back out on the streets or is the problem that she's
white. Go on, tell us, Mayor, tell us representative, you don't want to show the white woman who got killed by a black man because you think that's going to encourage racism. God, people ask me why I'm not a liberal? That's why. Would I ever want to be so broken in my soul that I think like that? Ugly stuff. This brings us to the crash of Tiger Woods, not career, car, again. He told police he was looking at his phone. He didn't realize the car in front of him had slowed. He was involved in a roll over crash, arrested for DUI, released on bail that same night. His Land Rover crossing lanes clipping a forward truck and partially rolled over. This was his second DUI arrest and fourth car crash that we know about. Man, let's tell you what.
There's been this conversation about how the PGA has to do something. It has to say something. There has to be a punishment. I'm pretty sure that producer Landon correct me if I'm wrong. I'm pretty sure they're going to want them at the masters. I'm pretty sure they still want him to be out there, correct? I would say more than likely. I would go with more than likely too. If he keeps driving, he's going to get someone killed. We're now into the place where he's just fortunate, fortunate that no one has been killed. But he's in this place and I don't know what the PGA is supposed to do. I don't know how they're supposed to react. Are they supposed to tell him he can't play in the masters? You're going to
suspend them? I don't know how that part works. Now compared to J. Nivey, this could be a conduct that's detrimental because nobody wants to bring it. Nobody who wants this brought into the into the tour. But I was on the phone. That's a weird defense. Super weird defense. Then there are home listings. Where's the market? Right now I got it. I got it right here. The pre-market was massive. Pre-market was massive, massive, massive today. There's a moment where at least at this very second, the Dow is up nine hundred.
The Nasdaq is up six seventy two because there's optimism for an end to the war in Iran. Okay. Now you can't get me to answer the following question. What do you mean an end to the war? What does an end look like? I don't know what they're optimistic about. But sure, knock yourself out. Maybe you're optimistic because this is War Powers Act and it has to be wrapped up in 60 days with another 30 days to engage all the extraction. Could be that as we are in the half way, Mark, the 30 days of this. But the idea that the markets can just look at a statement and be like, all right, everything's going to be fine. Up nine hundred two weird for words.
I would rather look at home listings. In the month of February, this is from Redfin. You have 630,000 more home sellers than buyers. And as a follow up, half of all listings have been on the market for 60 days plus. Now to the realtor's out there, the terminology they use is stale. I have never heard that before. I have never heard a listing referred to a stale, but I'm not in that world. So maybe that's how it's used. And Miami leads the major metros in the share of stale listings. 52% of listings, this is February, on the market for at least 60 days without going under contract.
Highest share for the month since 2019, which is interesting. It's a pre-COVID number. The issue is elevated mortgage rates because if I take a look at the 30 year fixed, that rate a month ago, March 1st was national average 6.05. Now you could have found it for less. You could have paid points all sorts of things with 6.05. Now 6.50. It's up a half a percent. And people are going to say, you know what, oh, wait, oh, wait, on that one. You have people with cars, car sales are down. Oh, wait, we'll see what happens with this warm, with the oil prices. Yeah, maybe it's not the time to buy the very large SUV like I did last month. I needed something
to move some equipment around. I needed something for work and I wasn't going to be just to pick up because I wanted something that could protect it. So I bought used, but very large, outrageously large SUV. And I believe I believe it gets three gallons to the mile. It's very exciting. It wasn't a home V. That is on the list, but it's lower on the list. Yeah, it's rough out there. It's hard out here for a pimp. It is rough out there. So you're seeing car sales not go as fast. I got to assume with home sales, if it's still in a certain range, people are buying. It's just that range gets slower as interest rates get higher. And then there was this just because I like to be proven right. You have a former Biden staffer. I do not know her. Agua Wollae, Yameesi Agua Wollae, former Biden White House staffer.
She's on TikTok and she's saying, you know, I went to Disneyland again. These people go into Disney. What are these people wearing? How are people going out of the house like this? They're in front of children. Why in the world is anybody wearing chaps at Disney as an adult? Great question. So glad you asked. The idea that there are indeed unwritten social expectations, societal expectations, that govern behavior, especially around families. Wait till you see the amount of people have been encouraged, Ms. Agua Wollae, by your party to dismiss, deny, and get rid of all of those expectations. Look at who you invited to the White House. Look at who you invited to the White House and you see the point. Yeah. Yeah. I'm Tony Katz. This is Tony Katz today.
So I didn't get to the story yesterday about the Pope and you've been hearing people talk about the story. What is it? Pope Leo says God rejects prayers of leaders who wage war. Okay. Tony Katz. Tony Katz today. Guys, an absolute pleasure to be with you. I don't expect since Pope John Paul II a Pope to be aligned with me politically. I wouldn't expect such a thing. I have not opposed to this Pope or any Pope. I leave it to Catholics to kind of engage. Hey, they've said this. They're this on policy or this on canon or this on rights. And I say yes, and I say no, et cetera. But the Pope wrote or spoke that Jesus does not listen to the prayers of those who wage war, but rejects them saying, even though you make many prayers, I will not listen to your hands are full of blood. And then this is our God, Jesus King of peace who rejects war, whom no one can use to justify war. That's different than whether
or not a war is justifiable. But the idea of the prayers rejected are prayers rejected of those who would fight to end slavery to free children from being raped. I want the Pope to answer that question because this is so directed at Trump and Israel regarding Iran, the people who suffer in Iran daily, the women who suffer in Iran daily, those who are gay who have suffered at the hands of the regime thrown off rooftops daily. He's got to answer those prayers. I accept that the Pope is going to say things that the Pope says and talks about bringing the world together in peace and harmony. It's hard to have peace and harmony with people who want to kill you. Sometimes you have to do horrible things. I don't always expect the Pope to understand. I would have expected a little
better than this. I'm Tony Katz. Why from the heartland and the crossroads of America? It's Tony Katz today. According to the Secretary of War, Pete Hegseth or Secretary of Defense for those of you who are touching about these things, all options are on the table. As far as President Trump and Boots on the ground, I don't understand why the base, which they have already, they understand, wouldn't have faith in his ability to execute on this. Look at his craft record of pursuing peace through strength, America first outcomes. What he's simply saying is exactly true and I've said from this podium too, we're not going to foreclose any option. You can't fight and win a war if you tell your adversary what you are willing to do or what you are not willing to do to include Boots on the ground. The end, our adversary right now thinks there are 15 different ways we could come at them with Boots on the ground. And guess what, there are.
So if we needed to, we could execute those options on behalf of the President of the United States and this department. Or maybe we don't have to use them at all. Maybe negotiations work or maybe there's a different approach. The point is to be unpredictable in that. Certainly not let anybody know what you're willing to do or not do. But if anybody has internalized the lessons of Iraq and Afghanistan as the first one, President Trump to call them out for what they are, he's not going to repeat those lessons. And I think I've been very clear about that from the podium. All warfare is based on deception. It's Sun Sioux people. This is Warfare 101. Tony Katz. Tony Katz today. Good to be with you. This is why the American left is so broken. They can't believe that. That doesn't make any sense to them. How could it be about deception? How dare you lie to the American people? No one's lying to the American people. But you don't let loose what your plans are. By the way, the full quote from Sun Sioux in the art of war. All warfare is based on deception, on deception. Hence,
when we are able to attack, we must seem unable. When using our forces, we must appear inactive. When we are near, we must make the enemy believe we are far away. When far away, we must make him believe we are near. Yup. But what a line. We're sending the ground troops. That's different than whether or not we place the ground troops. We've got a 2,500 Marines on the USS Tripoli. We've got this, the 82nd Airborne, but have we placed the troop anywhere? Wasn't this our conversation yesterday? What does boots on the ground actually mean? And why are so many people worked up by it? Now, I have made the statement as clear as day that a President Trump says we're going to go get the uranium. That clearly means somebody has to walk in and get the uranium. Whether that's the U.S., whether that's the Israelis, it's somebody. So there's going to be a boot on the ground. But I think what people mean is in a fighting posture actually sitting there in some kind of line like where the red coats firing at the IRGC. I'm not even sure they quite understand what they
mean by boots on the ground. But correct, nothing's happened yet. But if you were to listen to the media, man, they are desperate to make you think all is lost. Desperate to make you believe we have completely failed. That's their objective. They hate Trump so much that everything has to be a failure we already lost. They don't care if they did moralize the troops, they don't care if they don't report the full story, they're fine with it. By the way, I hosted a Sean Spicer show today. So if you get the first there, you should get it as Sean was out today. So I was filling in his host. And so be sure to watch that. And we get into this conversation myself and radio host Grace Curley and then Tim Murta who was comms director in 2020 and then special advisor in 2024 and Alex Sawyer, who is the editor over there at the Washington Times. This very concept
of trying to demoralize the political left cares more about power than people and they care more about controlling country. Those are the facts. Can't not really deny it. And this is a great way to prove this. And this idea that you're not telling us, man, don't tell the press a dang thing. These people cannot be trusted. Now, as for whether or not a ran will make a deal. But if Iran is wise, they will cut a deal. President Trump doesn't bluff and he does not back down. You can ask Cmany about that. The new Iranian regime should know that by now. This new regime, because regime change has occurred, should be wiser than the last. President Trump will make a deal. He is willing. And the terms of the deal are known to them. If Iran is not willing, then the United States War Department will continue with even more intensity. Now, the question, of course, is with whom are we debating? And I think this is a
fine conversation. And I'm telling you, I don't know. There's an interesting, I don't know, do I call it a bit of data? There was a story, right? A story going around about how the president of Iran, Pzezhekian, is talking about the fact that he's not involved in the negotiations. And he's angry about this. And so there was a source where Pzezhekian is complaining that he wants to be involved in negotiation, because without a deal, the economy will collapse in three weeks. And allegedly, there was a response from the IRGC, the Islamic Revolution,
Guard Corps, one of their chiefs that said, that's exactly why you can't be involved, you'll give up everything for a deal. And allegedly, a response from Pzezhekian, sorry, I missed for not seeing his name, was that he's like, you know, I'm unable to resign, I can't make my own decisions, all I can do is read from a script. And so it leads one to believe that the IRGC is in charge. Now if that's true, if the Islamic Revolution and Guard Corps is in charge, well then there's no negotiation that is possible. You have to break them of their money before you even get close to that. There is no negotiation that is possible. But just as I discuss deception, who knows if this conversation is real, who knows who they're negotiating with, are they negotiating with the parliament, spokesperson, in Iran, because if they're engaged in negotiation with Galiba,
the Hamid-Baghir Balagaf, the speaker of the parliament, well, what makes anybody think that he could be trusted? He replaced Larajani, Larajani was killed by the Israelis. I believe it was the Israelis. Why would I trust him to a negotiation? What would be there if the IRGC is controlling things on the ground? How do you make that happen? This is why I'm one of the people who understands that the boots on the ground conversation, or at least how I take it, I shouldn't say I'm one of the people who understands like you don't. That's stupidly rude and I apologize. I believe the boots on the ground doesn't have to mean Tehran. Doesn't have to be an actual invading force into the mainland of Iran. It could be the absolute obliterizing, that's right, my word, of Carg Island, and ending their ability to get hard currency, stopping that flow. It could be the taking of Kesham. It could be the taking of other small islands in the air. That would be boots
on the ground, but as a different play than mainland invasion. Because I don't think the invasion is going to be the way it goes at all. But I don't think you really get anywhere until you cut off the money supply. Because I have no reason to think that the IRGC is going to heal if they're still dollars coming their way. Because if there are no dollars and they have no support to being in this position of power, that's when the people rise up and they have to run for their lives. Those IRGC members, anybody who's left to besiege, they're getting killed. The Iranian people are going to kill them. Are we taking bets? I take, oh no, the Iranian people are going to kill them. The very first chance I get, no question, no quite now. I will also say, and that is my sincerest hope
that they are able to eliminate the IRGC. If the IRGC all runs away, okay, they all run away. And then the people are able to establish their own government. What government, that's going to be? I don't know. I don't know how it's going to look or how it's going to play out. But I absolutely and wholeheartedly want that for them. And I believe that if we leave without the people working on their own government, we're making an absolutely massive mistake. But boots on the grounds is not yet in play. And sending boots doesn't mean you've engaged in invasion. A lot of ways this can play out. A lot of you, this could be a layered approach, a little bit here and a little bit there and a little bit there and a little bit this and a bombing over here and moving over here. You have to eliminate the threat altogether. Now this now gets into, as Pete Hegseth was speaking this morning at the press conference, giving the latest with a general Dan Cain. Hegseth gets into what's going on with European nations. And as far as NATO is concerned, that's a decision that
will be left to the President, but I'll just say a lot has been laid bare. A lot has been shown to the world about what our allies would be willing to do for the United States of America when we undertake an effort of this scope on behalf of the free world. These are missiles that don't even range in the United States of America. They range allies and others and yet when we ask for additional assistance or simple access-facing overflight, we get questions or roadblocks or hesitations. And the President is pointing out, you don't have much of an alliance if you have countries that are not willing to stand with you when you need them. He's simply pointing that out and ultimately it'll be his decision of what that looks like after this is complete. Now this starts with a post from President Trump. All of those countries that can't get jet fuel because of the Strait of Hormuz, like the United Kingdom, which refused to get involved in the capitation of Iran. I have a suggestion for you. Number one, buy from the U.S. We have plenty
and number two, build up some delayed courage, go to the Strait and just take it. You'll have to start learning how to fight for yourself. The U.S.A won't be there to help you anymore, just like you weren't there for us. Iran has been essentially decimated. The hard part is done, go get your own oil, President DJT. Now it didn't say thank you for your attention to this matter and I was very upset by that. Very upset by that. This is a weird and fascinating post because he's calling out the UK directly. It could like the United Kingdom, which refused to get involved in the capitation of Iran. I have made the case for this and I believe I am accurate. You didn't invite the UK to be a part of this at the beginning. You invited the Mipso facto after the fact, well nobody wants to be a part of the thing after the fact. They want to be seen as leading against this regime, against the terrorists, the threat to the
nation. Seen as a leader on the world stage, they don't want to be like, oh well Trump told us we have to do this. So come on, we have to do this. All politics are local and there was no way for Keir Starmer no matter how terrible he is to sell that to the British people, he couldn't do it. So he didn't and I don't understand how people are surprised by this. But if we had heard that the Royal Navy was going to come and help keep the straight open, where the hell are they? Why isn't that happening? So the idea of get off your butt sits, your oil, go do something about it, I believe it's accurate. Now I think it's an interesting statement. You'll have to start learning how to fight for yourself. The USA won't be there to help you anymore, just like you weren't there for us. There is one way to take this and that is did President Trump just change foreign policy and are dealings with Great Britain and allied? Did we just, did we just change statecraft right here? Did anybody talk Marco Rubio? Right, that's one way you can take it. The other way is, oh you're not going to show up for us,
you know what? Screw you, screw your mom. Oh and by the way your sister's fat, like it's that and you say to me, what do you mean they weren't there for you? This brings us to a story about France and you realize that he's utilizing the UK as his focus but it isn't the whole story. France denied Israel and the US flights over their territory. Trump writing on true social, the country of France wouldn't let planes headed to Israel, loaded up with military supplies, flyover French territory. France has been very unhelpful with respect to the butcher of Iran who's been successfully eliminated. The USA will remember. Damn mother straight. I believe I left that word there. I believe I left that word. Can we check with the judges? I did. I left that word. Damn straight. You don't let us fly over your airspace. You NATO nation. I don't want to be
friendly. I think the next time you see Emmanuel Macron, Mr. President, he tries to stick out his hand. You tell him to kiss off and then let's talk about his mother. You don't let us fly over. Are you out of your skulls? That requires a repercussion that reminds France who they are in the game. You don't have to agree with us. I do not require this. I'm the one who made the argument that it is not surprising that they did not jump to assist because they didn't want to be seen that way. They need to be seen strong to their own people. Trump has to recognize this. Understand this. All politics are local as we've stated and that's real. You don't let Americans fly over your airspace? No, no, no. That is not how a friend treats a friend. And if you ain't a friend, then what the hell are you? I think we need to make some serious moves to let France know that
that simply won't be tolerated. That's not acceptable. You know it's better if we take out the Iatola. You know it's better if we end this regime. Why would you get in the way? Are you afraid of all the Islamists? You've imported into the country because you're mass migration, nonsense, is nonsense and destroying French culture? Too bad. Maybe if you stood up to them, you would help us stand up to the terrorist, the Iatola and this disgusting regime, all of whom in it have to die. Not because I say so, but because if they don't, Americans die and of course Europeans die and we don't want this anymore. President Trump should not let this go. You want to slap around the UK, you can. But France deserves every bit of derision and they should feel the heat because that's unacceptable. That's not going to work. That is not what a friend does. You gave us a statue
and we gave you our boys upon the walk. When we need to fly over to make sure American lives are safe, you say, right this way, my friends, think that we don't know how this is going to end. And Pete Hexeth is, of course, right, 15 different possibilities and I'm sure there's 150 possibilities. And my faith is with them and I want to see this regime gone. Nations that made it more difficult, not that didn't necessarily cooperate, but got in the way that should be remembered and should be remembered forever. This is Tony Katz today. So it's an eight-one decision on Chile's versus Salazar, Supreme Court striking down Colorado's minor conversion therapy law. They say it's a violation of the First Amendment and they're right. Gorsuch with the decision, me, I'm Tony Katz, the show is Tony Katz today saying that the law regulated speech based on viewpoint
failed scrutiny. What they wanted to say is you as a therapist could not tell a boy, well, you're not a girl, you're a boy. That's what Colorado wanted. These people are sick, dangerous and twisted. They really want to abuse children and they don't ever want children to know the reality. They want all the space in the world to keep the abuse up. So this overturns the lower court rulings that upheld the law and it signals that talk therapy cannot be broadly categorized as professional conduct exempt from First Amendment protection. The person who ruled against it, Katz, Brown Jackson. Katz, Brown Jackson with the dissent and according to sources, her dissent was longer than Gorsuch's opinion and Kagan's concurrence with it. So her argument is that everybody missed the big point is that they're providing therapy as licensed healthcare professionals rather than
speaking in abstracts and that the decision, quote, threatens to impair state's ability. That's according to the article. So not her quote. It threatens to impair state's ability to regulate the provision of medical care, extending constitutional protections into uncharted territory. Do I trust Brett Kavanaugh? Do I trust Amy Coney Barrett? Do I trust Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito? Or do I trust Katz, Brown Jackson? Who cannot even tell you what a woman is? Yeah, yeah, her impeachment can't happen soon enough. This is Tony Katz today. So we all understand that there are spies from other countries in the United States or keeping an eye on the United States. We understand that we, the United States, we have spies in other countries are keeping an eye on other countries. I don't think this is new to anybody, shocking to anybody. I don't think this is a, well, I always assume, but I didn't know it was real. It's real.
Tony Katz, Tony Katz today, good to be here, good to be with you. Find everything I do over at Tony Katz.com. The question is, should we be in inviting spies, opening the door for the opportunity for spies? I am a full on believer that that's what we're doing when we allow the Communist Chinese party to have student visas. President Trump is wrong. We should not allow student visas for educational purposes at all to the Communist Chinese. Nope. We don't have this. We don't allow this. Oh, call me any name you want. This is a conversation of national security day in and day out time and time and time and time again. We hear about home. There, there have got viruses working at this lab. They're doing things over here. We knew about the Confucius Institutes. The Confucius Institutes were the situations, these, these not buildings, but clubs set up and
and these clubs were to help bring a better understanding of Chinese culture. That's not what they did. The Confucius Institutes were there to try and stop anybody from saying anything on campus bad about the Communist Chinese party. It was propaganda from beginning to end, trying to threaten and intimidate people to keep them from speaking out. The Communist Chinese party is awful and terrible. I know I'm never going to get to go to China. I have to be elected president to be able to go to China. The Communist Chinese party is horrifying. I'm never going to see the terracotta soldiers and that's the way it goes. I will never walk the Great Wall of China and that's too bad because I would love to. But reality is what it is. The Communists all communists are horrifying. All communists are rooted in an absolute evil and they have somehow convinced themselves that they provide a value. It's disgusting. It's despicable. It's immoral. It is amoral. It is horrifying
that this could take place and that we have 20-somethings in America who could look at Zoran Mamdani or Bernie Sanders and say, yep, that's the way. We have failed in our task in part of the failure is we have allowed true indoctrination to take place. We have allowed manipulation to take place in the university set and in younger sets and we did not move fast enough to stop it. They have gotten a serious foothold in, not just a toehold. They have got their claws in deep to a lot of our kids and it's our job to rip them out and throw them away. This ideology, this Communism, this horror of progressivism needs to lose and we need to make sure it loses. And part of that is not allowing that influence and certainly not allowing people who are a danger to the American populace and that is anybody connected to the Chinese Communist Party because they want to harm the population that is the United States. They want to do away with Western civilization. They want to be the top dog. So we have this spy conversation. Now many
of you are fully aware that representative Eric Swalwell was involved with a Chinese spy. This was a woman on his staff who helped with fundraising known as Christine Fang and in other circles was known as Fang Fang. Not only did she help Swalwell, by the way, Swalwell is a low guy. He really and truly is. And the story was always that he was having an intimate relationship with this spy and I say to you, I don't believe he was. I don't think he ever could have made that happen. He couldn't even land the spy who was there to shack him. She placed an intern in his office in the 2014 campaign cycle. Now he, as the Hill has reported, was not accused of criminal wrongdoing. He stopped dealing with Fang in 2015 after being briefed by US intelligence officials on their suspicions of her. And then there was a House ethics probe and that concluded
in 2023 without taking any further action. That is not to say that Eric Swalwell is all innocent. Not taking further action is different than a proclamation of not guilty or of any innocent whatsoever. So what's being discussed right now is Cash Patel, the FBI director. He's pushing for the release of the files related to an investigation into Swalwell's interactions with the spy. This, according to New York Times and the Washington Post. So FBI agents, they're a person on California where he's running for governor. He's currently a congressman from California. They've been directed to gather and redact sensitive information, according to the Hill. And these documents we used in preparation for sharing with senior Trump officials. This, according to people familiar with the matter, Swalwell is furious. Now Swalwell's saying they're so desperate to try and stop me because I'm running for governor. I'm the favorite. He's not actually the favorite. There's a lot of different polling out of California, including
the fact that two Republicans might top the polling, which would be very, very interesting stuff if that was the case. Because of the way they do things, you could have two Republicans running to be the next governor of California. It's fascinating. Will it happen? I don't know that. Can it happen? Absolutely. Absolutely. It can happen. Let me see where we are. Let me see if I have California polling right here. Emerson has Swalwell plus four. Berkeley and PBIC have Hilton, Steve Hilton at plus one. And so when you take a look at the last poll, it was the Berkeley poll has Hilton at 17 in Blanco, another Bianco. No,
Blanco. Is it Bianco or Blanco? I always thought it was Blanco. Oh no, it's Bianco. Sorry, my mistake. Chad Bianco. All right. That's better. That's right. At 16 and Swalwell's in tied for third place. So this is a tight, tight race. And Swalwell is absolutely not the favorite in this race. Right now, Steve Hilton is the guy running. If you know the name, Steve Hilton, it's because you know it because he was a host of Fox. He had the weekend show over Fox. I never met him. I never worked with him, but right now he's doing very, very well. And hopefully that does indeed continue. So Swalwell saying, well, this is just because I'm doing so well. It's not because you're doing so well. Donald Trump and Casper-Tel do not get to pick the next governor. No, you're right about that, but they can endorse, or at least the president can, and certainly if you were involved with a spy, we can ask questions about it. But I bring this
up because we have an issue with spies. This is a story that was reported by CBS News. So this is the clip they put up that a Stanford student, her name is Elsa Johnson. She is making the claim that she was targeted by a Chinese spy. And then they were relentless in trying to get her to not talk about their interactions. This is Elsa Johnson and then the reporter. I'm here because I was personally targeted by a suspected agent of the Chinese Communist Party while conducting research at Stanford. A Chinese spy trying to recruit an American college student. That's exactly what happened to Elsa Johnson. She's a Stanford student. She's a junior now. And her freshman year, she was working on a research project looking at Chinese business and the military. And guess what? She started receiving messages from a man who had
images of Stanford in his profile made it seem like he was affiliated with the university, trying to engage her in conversation, trying to get her to come to China, take a listen to what she had to say on Capitol Hill. A man calling himself Charles Chen reached out to me on social media. He had mutual followers with me and photos of Stanford on his profile. Over the following weeks, he asked detailed questions about my background, offered to pay for a trip to China, sent me a flight itinerary to Shanghai, and pressured me to move our conversation to WeChat, an app that is monitored by the CCP. Things escalated. At one point, she felt so uncomfortable. She started taking screenshots of the conversation. He publicly commented on one of my Instagram posts in Mandarin asking me to delete screenshots I had taken of our conversation. I do not know how he knew I had these screenshots. The FBI did tell her earlier this year, this academic year, that she was actually being physically monitored on campus and that her family was too. The FBI confirmed
he had no affiliation with Stanford. He was likely operating on behalf of China's Ministry of State Security. I was one of at least 10 female students he targeted since 2020. After my co-author, Garrett Maloy, and I published our investigation, the incidents worsened. I began receiving intimidation calls where callers would switch to Mandarin, and in one case, the caller referenced my mother. Just this week, I received another call from US number. After exchanging halos, the caller switched to Mandarin and asked whether I had finished dinner. I have also received threatening scam emails attempting to convince me to take down my reporting on this issue. So this is a really scary thing, and guess what, it's not brand new. Chinese operatives have been trying to infiltrate various American institutions for years, for decades. And in fact, back about 15 years ago, I was covering China a lot. I had studied in China, lived in Nanjing, did my graduate work there, and I started doing stories on China,
and I was flooded with invitations from people reaching out to me in Mandarin, and I never responded to any of them, but I wonder if I had something like this would have happened at the time I worked at ABC News. It probably would have happened. I mean, this is just one story. Wait until we find out that there are hundreds of these stories, or tens of these stories, it wouldn't matter. This is happening, and the question we have to ask ourselves is, what is our plan? How do we want to deal with this? How do we want to safeguard against this? Well, first, we must be clear that it happens, and we must be clear that anybody who is associating with the spies needs to at least be looked at. I do not argue that they did anything wrong because it is very possible that they're being duped, they're being used. Remember, no one believes the con more than the mark. Absolutely true. But one way these things are limited is if you do not allow anybody connected to the party
in the country. So we start where we start. Any single able-bodied male Chinese coming through the border, the answer is no. We send them right back. We don't care what they claim. It is a 100% return to sender. We send you back. That's what we do. We have to start there. Then we put an end to all student visas from China. The answer is no. If universities then claim that they're not going to be able to survive because they rely on this money and these students pay full freight, right? They pay the non-in-state out-of-state tuition costs that they pay more. Don't care. We can handle having less universities. We don't need the university to stay afloat at the expense of American security. Don't care that much about the university. Tell the professors to get real jobs. Don't want to hear about their problems. Don't want to hear about anything other than we're protecting
the nation and ensuring that the rights of the citizens remain intact. The rights of the communist Chinese national. I don't give a damn about the rights of the communist Chinese national. In the United States, they may care in China. I can't tell them not to care in China, but I don't care about it in the US at all. Then anybody associating with knowingly associating with a communist spy, a Chinese spy or really any spy, we need public penalties of severity. I know there is spy and I'm assisting. It leads to massive, massive, massive penalties, up to and including the big stuff. Now, I am not a death penalty guy. I'm not, but I am willing to entertain when it comes to spying on the nation or smuggling in viruses into the nation. I'm willing to entertain
it all because we have to end this. It's us or them. That's the story. So let's be clear. This woman instead of her, Elsa Johnson is making it clear. The story of Fangfang makes it clear. The communist Chinese party doesn't believe in our existence and our growth and our future. They believe in the end of us. So let's stop them. Let's be wide eyed. Let's not kid ourselves. Let's not lie to ourselves. It's us or them and I choose us. This is Tony Katz today. I'm filling in for Sean Spicer today on the Sean Spicer show. Tony Katz, Tony Katz today. So that's going to air this evening. If you missed it, don't worry. They've got to repeat. You can get it on YouTube. It plays on the first. How do I not have a show on the first? I mean, I do two radio shows a day. I do eat, drink, smoke. I've got time. Come on. We have time for a little TV fun and Jacularity. Why not? Sean has always been very, very nice to me and I do appreciate it and
hope he's well and they're like, hey, do you have the ability to fill in? I'm like, absolutely. It'll be a pleasure to fill in for Sean. So I'm scheduled to do that. That will be 6 p.m. Eastern tonight. And again, if you missed it, because some people get the show later and listen to the podcast, I'll have the show. They have clips on YouTube, but I'll have the show. I will post it over at Tony Katz. So you can see it for yourself. It is going to be a joy and a treat. I don't know. For me, I think it's a little bit of a not for them, right? I'm not auditioning. It's a test run for me to the idea of, you know, I talk about TV, but would I actually want to do it? Would I actually want to do this and add this to the to the things? And I think the answer is how much? No, I think the answer is sure, but it'll have to be my kind of show, not the kind of shows you already see on the air. Meanwhile, Sean Spicer, the first, I'm filling in. So be attuning in. Find everything at Tony Katz.com. Tomorrow, everyone, take care.
More episodes
More from Tony Katz Today

Tony Katz Today Full Show - 09/11/26
Tony Katz Today

Tony Katz & Steve Yates on Iran Moving Houthi's
Tony Katz Today

Episode 4729: Tony Katz Today Hour 3 - 09/11/26
Tony Katz Today

Tony Katz & Senator Todd Young on RNC Midterm Convention & Micro Modular Reactor...
Tony Katz Today