Pain & Bears!

0:00This is an I Heart Podcast. Guaranteed Human. Broadcasting live from the Abraham Lincoln radio studio, the George Washington Broadcast Center. Jack Armstrong and Joe Gettie. I'm strong and Gettie. And now he is Armstrong and Gettie. No, he'll never get to that. Okay, we can't get to that one. We'll never get to that one. We'll never get to that one. We'll have that one's impossible. Yeah. Last night's tennis match. One of the biggest upsets in long, long time in tennis. You got an American moving on in the US open. And we now have a face of American tennis, which we haven't had in many, many, many years.

1:00As other countries have dominated this Ben Shelton guy, who is the eight seed knocked off the defending champion. And this guy had one 18 straight grand slam matchups and all this different sorts of a spaniard. We don't want a spaniard out there dominating tennis on our country. So the Shelton is going to be the first American in the final in 29 years. Yeah. I mean, we haven't had men doing well in tennis. US men in a very, very long time. I used to watch tennis a lot. And liked it. And I wish I had a watch last night. It went until 3 30 in the morning there in New York. He's going to stop him. 3 30 a.m. It was four and a half hours long. The fact that it started at 11 30 is just nuts. I, I missed the fact that this was happening. And I haven't a call a friend of mine on a completely unrelated matter. Like I call friends about tennis. But I called the friend of mine. And he said, yeah, I'm watching the tennis match. So, uh, tennis match, what tennis match? So somehow he had been aware that this was going to happen.

2:02Uh, and incredibly exciting. Like that point just there. It was back and forth with like spinning around and diving and running as fast as you can and hitting over your head and all kinds of crazy stuff like that. Anyway, either like tennis or you don't. So the story on this Ben Shelton guy is kind of interesting. And this is where I'm setting up the political angle. Because everything has to have a political angle, right? Yes. Joe Scarborough from Morning Joe today. So this Ben Shelton guy, it's a pretty cool story because they come here from Sierra Leone. His dad comes here as an immigrant. Can't find work gets work at a local tennis club like it's a maintenance guy or whatever. And because he's working there, his kid gets to play tennis there for free. And it turns out to be a really good tennis player and it's the only way they could afford. And then he gets swept up in the world of professional tennis and nice story. Um, but of course, Trump hates that sort of thing as described here by Joe Scarborough.

3:05And, and here we are. He's now going into the semi finals of the US open. Willie, that is, uh, that is the American dream. A lot of people in the White House don't understand it and I've been politically here. They don't like these stories. They don't understand these stories. They think these people from other countries should be kept out. No, no, this is America. This is what makes our hearts swell with pride to see that in America, anything is possible. You're right. That's strong man. Beat him. Kill him. You're right. Trump supporters all across America. So angry that this kid won this tennis match last night because his dad was an immigrant kid. Are you kidding me? Are you kidding me? Is that where we are on our conversations about this sort of thing? Yeah. Everything's clickbait. Everything's ragebait. Oh my God. Except enough straw man kicking the hell out of them. That's what you think of. They're showing the tennis highlight on a show there in New York.

4:07It's exciting match and you turn it into, of course, Trump saw that and hated that because he hates the idea of any immigrant family doing well. But I use another successful immigrant, dammit. What are you talking about? I thought we'd moved past the idea that if you hate illegal immigration like almost everybody in America does, that that means you hate the whole immigrant story and all immigrants and I thought we had moved past that idiotic conversation. Well, I despise it when people come to this country because they perceive it to be the land of opportunity and then they succeed in their dreams and love the country more than anybody. I hate those stories. You're right, Joe Scarborough. You found us out. Now that's how pinhead of their viewers are. What do they got? 30 viewers at this point. Wow. Wow. How's it going to make some damn much money? Wow. I just, I was, my jaw was open as they think. Really? That's where you're going to go with.

5:08Yeah, boy. That's how you're going to be. That's how you're going to be. Yeah. That's how you're going to be. But we talked about him yesterday. The Amazon plane that crashed in Miami and squashed those poor people in a van. The black, sucky way to go. Oh my God. It's just, it's just, it's one in a zillion. Right. It's like getting hit by lightning. Well, the NTS base is really confused. I assume they're confused. An anxious to interview the pilots, which they're going to do. I believe today because the black box show that the Boeing 767 speed breaks, which are panels that create aerodynamic drag when you land. They were not deployed. And neither were the thrust reversers, which redirect air to slow the plane while it is landing. The aircraft's wheel breaks were applied 23 seconds before the end of the black boxes recording. Those breaks were released a few seconds later.

6:09And the throttle increased to levels consistent with go around thrust, meaning aborting the landing and saying we got to take off again. So he was so far past where he was supposed to land. You could have seen that he believed that he would have done that. Right. We got a touch and go. We got a touch and go. Right. So the question is was he on his phone or something and didn't know what he was supposed to do. Or did he hit all those buttons and the plane didn't react to the buttons? Yeah. It's a real head scratcher at this point. The flights captain 55 years old certified to fly the jet in May of this year. He had about 7100 flying hours. The first officer 37 years old certified last year had 2600 flying hours as of last month. They're going to interview them today. So who knows? Who knows? Something went terribly wrong. I bet they'll be able to figure it out though. Don't you think? Oh, yes. Of course, Senate. He says, yeah, I press the buttons. Is there a way to figure out whether they press the buttons or not or poll believers or whatever there?

7:10Now, you are well beyond my expertise on this topic. I found this very interesting, totally different topic. Great piece by Scott Morrison in the journal. A couple of years ago, China decided to play the hard ass on the rare earth minerals, specifically or most notably some of the rare earth stuff that's used in magnets and high tech pursuits, right? During the Trump administration, I'm sorry, I meant to explain. Scott Morrison was the former Prime Minister of Australia when Trump was in office the first time. And I know that. But so he and Trump and some of our other allies had a bunch of meetings about how vulnerable we were to China's monopoly on all of this stuff. And they started to work toward a world where we had different supply chains and capacity to develop our own or working with our allies to do that. And then a couple of years ago, as I started to say, when China decided to play the H.A.

8:16and enact all those import controls, it alerted everyone to, oh, we need to supercharge our efforts. And he's saying it's born, it's yielded some really good fruit so far and that China made a huge miscalculation because like Iran closing the straight there for a while and it's more less with mostly closed now. They the rest of the world realize, all right, we can't be vulnerable to this sort of thing. Now all of the Western world is realized we can't be vulnerable to China and now we are supercharging our efforts to do those things, to get those minerals elsewhere. And in essence, he's saying China played their hand way too early. They alerted the world that we need to get smart and the world is getting smart. So that's one good thing Trump administration has done. Absolutely. If he let him agree tennis players in, oh, for God's sake, let's see what time is it. All right, one more, one more I found this super interesting.

9:19Cause I think about this sort of thing a lot. There's something better than happiness, right? Mark Edmondsson, who's a professor and author and he's talking about retirement kind of mostly, I guess, but he talks about Labor Day is here. You already missed the lapping waves and waves and subtle breezes. Maybe you're missing the forest where you can think your general thoughts in a green shade. You found with therapists and you'll get teachers call your happy place and how that's all lovely. I don't like many of us because I can't good a good signal. Wow. Keep track of my doomscroll. And many people clicked on my tweet. Right. Yeah, that's very frustrating. But he says most of us think the goal of life is to work hard, succeed and live softly for the rest of our days. Get on a sailboat to nowhere. Go to the South of France and sample every wine, paired dish float from one music festival to the next. Then he cite some philosophers who agree with him and some great authors of history.

10:24I'm not one of those people, by the way. Yeah, I really enjoy that sort of stuff watching the birds. Oh, I could do it for hours. But then he points out there are others who think that happiness of this sort, if not to be avoided altogether, then it needs to be taken in guarded doses. He says, I'm with them. The German philosopher Arthur Schopenhauer warned us that human beings have two main enemies. Evil doers and your neighbors, bears, pain and bears. No, pain and boredom. We use our intellects to guard ourselves from pain, but and this is so good. Cause I've seen this. Once we've escaped pain, the mind keeps worrying on demanding new objectives, new distractions. So off we go into folly, we gamble and often lose. We have affairs and fracture our marriages. We provoke quarrels by their nature. Our minds cannot rest. The problem with that happy life we're planning for is that it will inevitably breed boredom and boredom begets trouble. And Schopenhauer wrote that against boredom, a man has quote, a great many fancy

11:28remedies, balls, theaters, parties, cards, gambling, horses, women, drinking, traveling. These are temporary soon. We're bored again. And so his solution and I find this very compelling, find something to occupy your intellect, whether you're collecting coins or stamps, learning about insects and birds, acquire languages, read good books, summarize them in journals, do not let the minds succumb to idleness. Most scenes that people associate with happiness, the golden beach, the splashing waterfall are boredom traps. I know because I've lived this, I got to live this when I was younger, not everybody does because you have kids and have a normal life. It's, I have no interest in sitting on a beach or any of those things that you just described at some point when I have the time because it's a dead end man. It's a dead end. It wears off really fast. Right. Right. And a guy like me probably loves it because, you know, believe it or not, we work really hard at this job. And so it's great to have a break and clear the mind.

12:28And then he gets into the, I have no breaks currently, but I was thinking about back in the day when I didn't have kids and I had money and I got an easy job. I got to do whatever I want. And that's a dry hole for happiness. I can tell you. Yeah. Yeah. And then he gets into the female version of it. I asked pretty interesting to. It's a little old timey because, you know, he was kicking it in what the last century, but pretty new problem in the history of homo sapiens though. Oh, yeah. To ever be in a situation where you could get bored, where you're not scrambling every day to come up with some food or you died about the time you go work. Just super, super briefly, then we need to take a break. Um, uh, Simone de Wovoix also argues for activity over passive forms of happiness and she's talking about how some women, their most dangerous temptation is what she called being in itself. People who cultivate, uh, like the standard of perfection, they strive to show others

13:31that they are complete and whole and fit and beautiful and blah, blah, blah. There's nothing wrong with being fit. But this is a condition she argues, especially tempted for women and girls. Everyone encourages them to be pretty self-contained. Perfect. The girl must make herself object. She must therefore renounce her autonomy. She's treated like a living doll and freedom is denied her. Anyway, food for thought. The term living doll reminded me of sex dolls, which reminded me of we were going to talk about that today. And I think I'm going to put it in the one more thing podcast and interesting, serious article about where sex dolls are headed along with AI. For the one more thing, if you subscribe, darn strong, you're getting on demand. One more thing auto downloads effortless. Speaking of AI, it's in the news today. We got a couple of texts about that topic with the guy who quit Anthropic because he's scared if you haven't heard that stay tuned among other things on the way. Armstrong and Getty. The CEO of Anthropic, Dario Amade, has said he believes we should have policies in

14:33place to pace the development of AI. That you think of the extent to which AI can make individualized propaganda can break into any computer system in the world. Can surveil everyone, everyone in a population is really scary and we have to stop it. So Sinek say that's a ploy. What are we talking about here? Guy who worked for Anthropic, which is the leading AI company in the world right now. Quit because he said, yeah, in the whole ways, they're having conversations about the fact that this could kill everybody on earth by the end of the decade. And I feel like this, we should stop. He also worked for Open AI. He had quit Open AI because he thought they didn't care enough about the damage that AI I was going to do. So we went big on this an hour one. If you only hear the whole discussion and go through all the tweets from this guy who quit Anthropic, you can catch it now or one on the podcast. Armstrong and Getty on demand. His name is Jacob Coxen, 27 year old researcher working at two of the biggest companies in the

15:39world. And he argues that both labs are racing towards self-improving super intelligence that they don't know how to control and the insiders privately treat extinction as a live possibility by the end of the decade. Now a couple of things from Joe's question has been a good question. This decade or the next decade, I mean, they're both bad. Or like a new decade starting right now, where does he mean the 2020s? Cause that's only three years. Are we talking three three and a half years or three and a quarter years or 13 and a quarter years? Cause I got a budget accordingly. Yeah, for planning purposes. So there's that question. There's also a number of people have texted. Kill us. How human beings will be extinct in 10 years. How? Ram paging robot dogs with cars, shooting lasers out of their eyes, biological agents, electricians, boiling.

16:42Anyway, to the other part of it, people who think Darius Amote, who is seen by most people who know him as the guy with a conscience in the world of AI, then of course he and his people keep saying that they want the rules to get in place while they're ahead as the number one company in the world. So they want the guidelines to be put in place while they're number one. Everybody who knows him says he's this kind of guy that he actually does care about this. I don't know. There's a lot of money overwhelmed. So Marco Rubio and I, Rubio and I share one characteristic. We're both handsome Cubans. No, wait, no, we both hate Marxists. Stay with us. Mars strong and getty. My head is bleeding, which is not a good look. Um, hey, Jack, can't. It's fine. How do you do? Can't help but notice the open wound. Um, I was, uh, that my parents house and they have a mini van and I was getting something out of the back and I'd been over too soon as the van lid opened up and hit my head on that sharp latch thing.

17:44Oh, no. I don't know how many times I've done that. They need to make the latch on vehicles less sharp because it's the most likely thing to hit your head on. So a way to make it less sharp. Anyways, it's your new cause. Give generously. Yeah. How did you do my head? So Marco Rubio, you know, Rubio and I and Jack for that matter, share something in common. We despise, uh, communist, uh, Marxism, uh, coming up the most dangerous intellectual of the 20th century, not the most famous or the most red. You probably never heard his name, but in terms of damage done, I would argue, and not more dangerous than Marx because you used Marx's ideas, but, uh, one of the most, uh, damaging people who have heard lived on earth. We will explain. He says quoted his Marx, but people don't know it. Uh, yeah, yeah. Indeed his, his marching orders are absolutely the marching orders of the degenerate, uh, woke left. And by the way, before we start Marco Rubio yesterday, talking about communism, it looked to me like he was speaking off the top of his head.

18:45Yeah. Which is pretty impressive, given what you're about to hear. Yeah, he's given a speech at, uh, a forum. I can't remember which one. It doesn't really matter. But, uh, will, uh, Marco speak from himself? I'm going to give a speech I've never given before. I hate Marxism and I hate communism. And I hate it because everywhere in the world that's ever been tried, it's led to tyranny and poverty and exile and oppression. And there's a mistake that people have made. Maybe some of us, maybe in myself, have been guilty of it. And that is the belief that somehow Marxism is dead. That Marxism is now something that crazy people at the faculty club at some university talk about, but it isn't really alive anymore. The other mistake we make is that Marxism is some sort of economic theory. Neither one of those things is true. Marxism is not dead and it's not an economic theory. What's happened is that Marxists realize what the track record of Marxism is around the world so they don't want to call themselves Marxists anymore. They have found new titles, things that frankly sound benign and you almost feel

19:48guilty being against social justice. Who can be against social justice? But that's a terminology they come up with. Equity, equity, who can be against equity? Go on, Marco, you got to hit a steam. But the truth of the matter is that this is not about economic solely. The old Marxism was the argument that the capitalist system, the whole system was flawed and rigged and it divided people. It made it said the world and society and capitalist societies are divided between two groups. You have one group which owns the businesses, they are the oppressors and you have the workers, everybody else, that group are the victims. And that's how communism works. It creates a victim class. It creates an oppressor class. And then it says the only way to fix this is we have to overthrow this system. We need a revolution. We need a government to take over and make everything fair and we need a government that goes to the former oppressors and makes them apologize for being an oppressor, be reeducated into responsible people.

20:48And pay a penance for what they've done. That's the old Marxism and it sounds familiar. Take it home, Marco, take it home. Because today we are being asked to divide. First of all, we're being told that America in and of itself was founded on racism, prejudice and evil. Not that we have a history of racism or prejudice, but that we were founded on that that's the foundation of our society that we are irredeanably broken in our history. System that the system is rigged. Not about capitalism. The system is set up to benefit the oppressor versus the victim. And who's the oppressor? The oppressor, basically, if you listen to some of these people as anyone who is a white male, heterosexual and everybody else, I guess myself included, being a Cuban American is a victim. And the only answer is for government to step forward and create equity and make things fair. That's pretty good off the top of your head, which is sure looked like he was

21:50speaking. And I have a visions of a Marco Rubio, Rahm, a manual debate for the presidency that would make our last several rounds of debates seem extra extra ridiculous. Oh, yes, I would agree. Yes, who's got a better golf game, for instance, perhaps the low moment in the history of the Republic. So Marxism made a couple of adjustments in the 20th century. Number one, the workers of the world unite didn't work. And so they decided, all right, anybody with any gripe of the world unite, and we will join with them in their gripe to overthrow the system, no matter how disparate or oppositional it is. That's how you get queers for Palestine, which is just an absurdity. But you know, fundamentalist Muslims want to overthrow the system and like really angry sexual minority types want to overthrow the system. So let's work together. That's, that's the whole of it.

22:51Okay. And then the second adjustment came courtesy of Antonio Gramsci, who, and I love this Twitter accounts, one of my favorites, Christoph of Poland, his last name has roughly 37 consonants in it. But he's absolutely a wonderful writer. And I'm going to quote him now. Gramsci was the most dangerous intellectual of the 20th century, not the most famous, not the most red, the most dangerous and the most consequential, because he was the one who figured out why the revolution kept falling, failing and what to do instead. This is the man who invented the long march through the institutions, which if you've studied communism, Marxism is a familiar phrase, even if you don't know quite what it means. But everything that followed and this may be familiar to some of you, the Frankfurt School, the Fabian Society's operational model, the captured university, the HR department, enforcing approved speech. They're all downstream of what he wrote in a prison cell between 1929 and 1935.

23:56He is being held in Mussolini's Italy as a communist. So his central question was, why hasn't the revolution happen? The glorious revolution. The working class was supposed to rise. The contradictions of capitalism were supposed to produce the revolution, but they hadn't, not in the West. And Gramsci's answer was precise and devastating. It was because the ruling class does not maintain power through force alone. It maintains power through cultural hegemony, control of the ideas, the values, the frameworks that we used to understand our world. So the worker who accepts that the existing order is simply how things are will not revolt, regardless of if he's exploited. So the revolution requires cultural change first. And the instrument to do that was the long march through the institutions, not not storming a barricade, the school, being a university, the media, the judiciary, the civil service, the cultural establishment,

24:56every institution that a civilization uses to transmit its values to the next generation, capture these and fill them with people who share the counter hegemonic project and the cultural assumptions that maintain the existing order gradually dissolve. No more barricades, no visible moment of rupture, just the slower placement of one cultural hegemony with another. Hence, friends, the idea that showing up on time is white supremacy. And racism is one of the most serious charges you can level in America. Working hard, saying America's land of opportunity, this is all racism. You know, there are a thousand examples, you've seen it. Good manners are racism, asking somebody to hand in their homework on time. That's racism. That's why they say this stuff. They're trying to dismantle the norms of our civilization through long march through the institutions. Well, some of those examples you gave there are obviously ridiculous and haven't

26:00caught on yet with most people, but in general, the general United States is a bad country and were the cause of all bad things. It has caught on and it is now the culture. And I read that thing too. And what I thought was so interesting, well, one, it's he's been successful. Him and his crowd have been successful. They've already done it. It's why you're so up against it. If you talk to somebody that's come through our current public schools and colleges, they're in that position. He was trying to get rid of where, well, they just feel like, well, yeah, because everything's this way and always has been this way. I mean, it's so intellectually and culturally a part of their world that the United States is a bad country and capitalism is bad and every, all white men are racist and all that sort of stuff. That you can't even, you can't hope to have an argument with them. Right. Right. So Christophe points out the educational capture was the masterpiece controlling the curriculum. And if you control the curriculum, you control the categories of thought

27:03available to the next generation. And it's not as simple as just telling them what to conclude. You shape the questions that they think to ask. You shape what they consider obvious. Like Jack just pointed out, you shape what they consider unthinkable. The generation educated after the long march does not need to be told what to think. It thinks what it was formed to think. You know, people are like, is that thinking is their own? I know people like this. Yeah. They have been so into it for so long surrounded by people who also are so into it. It's just like a fish doesn't always wet. I mean, it's just, it's their whole world. Yeah. And and and it's disturbing because, like I said, you can't sit down one of these people and change their mind. It's going to take a lot along March through the institution, the other direction to turn us around. And a grandsy or Gransky, you have to salute his brilliance because he also

28:03theorized in his writings from prison, what he called the organic intellectual, the person who translates the theoretical, theoretical framework into stories and assumptions that circulate throughout the culture. But don't even appear ideological. The film that makes the existing order seem absurd. The journalist who frames every story within the approved assumptions. Gransky understood that culture is politics by other means and that the side that controls the culture wins, regardless of who wins the elections. And you know, any Christoph dresses, whether it's a conspiracy theory, I mean, it is in a way, but it's as I often say, these people wrote books. Their names are on the spines. They said precisely what they wanted to do and how they were going to do it. Now they're doing it. But it's a published documented widely taught strategy that the left implemented consciously across the entire Western world. The 1968 generation put it into practice in the universities. They became the professors, the journalists, the civil servants, the judges, the HR directors of the decades that followed and the March took 50 years,

29:08but it works. Yeah, it worked. You know, I, as soon as I read this, I thought, you know, a, a, a smaller version of this for conservatives was the way, and I think they were using this phrase, use the federal society with the long march through the judges and the judicial to get Roe versus Wade overturned. They had this goal decades ago to start with judges at the very bottom and work. So you get to the point that it's just so much of the judicial branch that you could get to where Roe versus Wade over. They did the same thing. It really works, but you have to be incredibly patient. You have to play a long game. Boy, and we're up against it now because I have it on very, very good authority that the law schools of America are practically exclusively left. We'll be talking left, left. We're going to be talking to Tim Sandefur later this week about a different topic. But yeah, we can ask him about that because he's been explaining that to us for years now. And that's horrifying.

30:09It'll take a long March, the other direction to turn that around and all those lawyers that graduate and they're going out into the world doing their thing with a completely different worldview than you've got. Yeah. Yeah. Christoph's last couple of sentences are the counter march has begun. It just doesn't have a name yet. And he's right. Awareness is up. I read this morning that the number of kids homeschooled in New York has increased by 200% in the last 10, 12 years. People are becoming aware, but boy, it's going to be a long fight. That's fine. I got nothing better to do. It was very clever on that dudes part. Brilliant man. Absolutely brilliant. He understood humans and societies and cultures. I mean, brilliant, evil, evil, completely evil, but brilliant. Yeah. Oh, any thoughts on that? You can text or email. We will finish strong next. Art is strong and getting an American Airlines passenger was duct taped

31:13after hurling racist and homophobic slurs during a mid air meltdown. And for anyone wondering, I did make my connection. So here's something that'll make you unhappy. Seems to be our goal. I was talking to an insurance agent the other day, car insurance. I'm talking here. My car insurance is just insane. This is a California thing. And what I'm about to tell you might be exclusive to California too, because every state has its own laws around insurance. But my insurance is the same part of it. It's just I got too many vehicles on my policy. But so is explaining to me this insurance agent about how we socialize car insurance and why the idea being if somebody got a drunk driving, oh, somebody on my policy had a wreck. And how much it was going to increase the cost of the insurance, even though it was a minor fender bender with like no fault.

32:17If somebody got a drunk driving, their insurance would be like $50,000 a year for the insurance company to be able to do it to want to insure him. And the state of California decided, well, the problem with that is, what they'll do is nobody can afford that. So they just will they'll just drive without car insurance. And that would be worse. So what we'll do is we'll spread that $50,000 out among all the other people who don't have any problems on their records. So that that person can afford the insurance who got a drunk driving. And that's why everybody's insurance is so high with this fairy that, well, we don't want to like really punish the person that, you know, whatever you weren't paying attention to your, staring at your phone, your aunt, somebody over or you got a drunk driving or whatever will socialize those costs so that we can guarantee that they can afford their insurance. How do you like that? Bull S will add in practically uninsured drivers, including many, many, many hundreds of thousands of illegals.

33:20Because there's, there's a state program in Cal Unicornia, the California low cost auto insurance program where normally you've got to carry at least 15 grand in property damage liability, 15,000. But under this state created program qualifying drivers can just carry $3,000 per accident. See, not 3000 per car or whatever, 3000 total. I'll save my conclusion to this for my final phone. Oh, something like for it. Creepy. Oh, now we have far stabier introductions than this one. Here's your host for final thoughts, Joe Getty. Let's get a final thought from the whole crew to wrap up the day, Michelangelo, what's your final thought? I got to start saving my pennies to get that new foldable iPhone. So $2,000, I think I can draw, you know, I got to figure out something.

34:20I'll give up electricity. I'm looking forward to the unveiling of it if it seems impressive. Katie Greener steamed a newswoman as a final thought, Katie. I'm thinking the same thing, Michael. I'm going to, I think I might start selling foot picks. Cause you want the new foldable iPhone. Oh, step in butter once a week, sell some fix butter. What is that a thing? I do like butter. Jack, a final thought for us. Here's what I think you should do. If somebody does something that makes their car insurance to expensive form, then I guess they don't get to drive. I guess, oh, no, here come the consequences of my actions. And I, I think when that happens and I who haven't done anything wrong, don't pay for your mistake. Yeah, yeah. I hate to close on a serious note, but the era where the US was impregnable and didn't really have to worry about much at all, it's over. Clearly. Yeah, we got to be on our toes for a bunch of different stuff. On your toes, you just dipped in butter for your foot picks. I know. And if anybody would like pictures of my toes, you drop me a note. We'll see if we can work something out.

35:20Gotta admit, Katie, I don't know what your husband thinks of this, but if you could make enough money off of feet picks to buy the new foldable iPhone, not be an interesting store. He hates the idea, but I'm still pushing for it. I think I would give the thumbs up. Armstrong and Getty wrapping up under the drooling four hour work day. My wife has lovely feet too. So many people, thanks a little time, go to Armstrong and get it out. Tom, pick up some Armstrong and getty swag. What do you have for your favorite eating G fan? Maybe it's even you T-shirt head hoodie. I wouldn't tell my kid when they got older. We will see you tomorrow. God bless America. I'm strong and getty Jacob Coxon is getting a lot of attention for his doom or is him about AI today. And it just replied sleep with one eye open. Put your feet far enough apart that you can stick your head down between your legs. And kiss your ass goodbye. It's good to go subscribe now.

36:22This time I'm strong and get it on the man. Armstrong and Getty.