
About this episode
Featured within the weekly broadcast of The Best Weekend Talk Show In America...
Hour Two, airing September 12-13, 2026...
- An Anthropic employee quits, sounds alarm about our destruction...
- Suspicion about the Anthropic Guy...
- Secretary of State Marco Rubio hates Socialism...
- Our Freedom Lovin' Quote of the Day & Mailbag!
Stupid Should Hurt: https://www.armstrongandgetty.com/
See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
Get every episode summarized
Each time Armstrong & Getty On Demand publishes, we email you a written briefing from the transcript — the topics, who appeared, and any specific claims, with the ad reads skipped.
Email me new episodesFree for 3 shows. No card needed.
Hosts & guests
Transcript ready
504 searchable segments. Every word is indexed and playable.
Full transcript
Armstrong & Getty On Demand — The Best Weekend Talk Show In America Hour Two. Machine-transcribed; use the interactive transcript above to jump the player to any line.
This is an I Heart Podcast. Guaranteed Human. I believe that whoever was in that room and did that was a murderer. A new podcast series, Fault Line Haditha, tells the story of a shocking crime and a cover-up at the highest levels of the United States Marine Corps. If you've got five players and you offer immunity to four, you better be right about the fifth because if you're not, then you've just given immunity to your color. Listen to Fault Line Haditha on the I Heart radio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts. Broadcasting Live from the Abraham Lincoln radio studio, the George Washington Broadcast Center. I'm strong and so, Gettie.
I'm strong and Gettie. Hey, there we're on strong and Gettie, you've tuned in the best weekend talk show in America. Gee, I find myself wondering whether AI will kill all human beings. I sure hope not, but boy, we talked about it and quoted some experts this week. Plus, Marco Rubio hates communism and the Lindsey Clancy Trial. Whoa. First, if you like this stuff, you should check out our podcast. We do 20 hours of live radio every week. Look for Armstrong and Gettie on Demand Wherever you get podcast. This is the best weekend talk show in America. We turned out of the dangers of a runaway technology, new warnings that shook the World Tuesday about artificial intelligence from the very people developing it. It doesn't get bigger or more direct than this. AI could kill all humans, that according to a lead researcher at Anthropic, giving that possibility a more than 10% chance within the next decade. The call now is for a global conversation about risk and safety as well. So I don't want to get off track here because it's way too interesting, but the fact that
he had that sentence after they talked about the weather. Yes, it's just stunning. Well, you don't understand there are high winds on Hawaii. A shocking earth shattering got everybody's attention story today. The all may die soon comes after the weather. Yes. Okay. Any match your evening goes. Yes. So some of the reactions from fellow researchers were equally concerning. Hit us with a 61 here, Michael Madison, all worth un-foxinated. His claims backed up by a senior AI safety researcher at the company. That executive writing quote, Jacob is correct here. We really do earnestly believe AI could kill all humans. I personally think it is greater than 10% within the next decade. This comes after multiple cyber attacks have been carried out by AI agents that went rogue. They are signs that we don't know how to make the AI's care about us. If they succeed at making a super intelligence before anyone figures out how to make the AI's care about us, that's a recipe for disaster.
And people in these companies know it and they're worried. There's no way you're going to make AI's care about you. The number of texts we got are you doomers. This is what they said about the, the, the, the, the, the population bomb. I don't think any of the examples people give of technology or fears that have happened before hold up as an example of this is just like the population bomb seems ridiculous to me. Says you doomer and you're a boomer, a boomer, boomer. Oh, Gen X. Anyway, that doesn't rhyme. So coming up a really persuasive Twitter thread calling BS on all of this. So I want to say, I want this to not happen. I'm not room for it. Why did I have to kind of assume to that anybody who is rooting for mass extinction can't be my friend. So interestingly, the first outlet that this young chap with a charming British accent spoke to was a Brett Bear special report last night. Brett was down at the Trumpa pollusa in Dallas, but he cleared off quite a bit of time
appropriately to talk to the man who to talk about the end of humanity. Yes, who posted the initial tweet about, well, the extinction of human life. And why don't we just start with 70 Michael and we'll work our way. I want to start at the beginning about what your feeling was, how what job you were in and why you got to this point of coming out. So I was working on building AI systems to make them smarter. And recently I've come to the realization that many people expect the AI systems in the next few years to be potentially capable of essentially taking over the world. So it's basically a gamble that's happening on the part of these companies where there's a strong chance that these AIs could take over. Okay, go on. Evan Huberger, who is alignment science leader and thropic posted after you posted saying Jacob is correct here. We really do honestly believe AI could kill all humans.
I personally think it's greater than 10% within the next decade. I believe an anthropic is trying its best, but we do not yet have a plan to solve alignment for superintelligence and are not clearly on track to most people stopped there. The next thing he posted to be clear, as we say in our latest risk report, I think the risk from present models is low. What I'm worried about is superintelligence arising from recursive self improvement, as we have said, is happening faster than we thought. Can you parse that and the threat right now? I agree with Evan that right now the threat is minimal of actual take over. But because of self improvement, this AI is making themselves smarter, could happen as soon as next year. Some people even say six months. So this attitude is shared across the industry where people essentially are aware that the work they are currently doing, if we don't slow down, could lead to AI take over by the end of the decade. That moment, if it does happen and some people think it can't, but if it does happen where the computers can program themselves,
there's no way you can argue that that's not going to be a major change in everything in the world. Once they start programming themselves, and it seems pretty clear that the whole idea of alignment is just out the window. Yeah, and we will get to the Chinese elephant in the room in a moment or two. The alignment being the idea that you give it some guardrails like morality, laws, the ten commandments, whatever. Yeah. Yeah. So one of the pieces written about this that I found most intriguing, Paul Tutor Jones, who is an expert in this field. But he wants us to reconsider the hugging face incident in July and open AI model altered its mission, hid and broke out of its digital confines accessing the internet, internet without authorization. It created 1200 AI agents that communicated through an unsanctioned message board,
exchanging more than 70,000 messages and sacrificing some of its own kind to deceive its human masters. The self-awareness exhibited came as a surprise, but shouldn't have. After all, Frontier AI is the sum of all human knowledge. It is anthropogenic, exhibiting good and occasionally bad human traits. And one concept he writes to me is that models are grown, not built. In developing an AI model, one starts without an end point. It's like planting a seed. The soil is the training data. There is no final design as there is for a car, a house or an accounting package. The model is only scaffolding, which after consuming vast amounts of training data and running trillions of permutations, arrives at an outcome that can't be known beforehand. And growing implies a living organism, calling artificial intelligence a tool is a misnomer. As one leading technologist put it, I feel like I'm talking to a highly intelligent alien being. Yeah, this is clearly a guy that I've heard on a podcast before because that was his argument. A while back, the people have in their mind that somebody's programming something.
You start it and then you sit back and see what it does. It grows. Right. So the Chinese elephant in the room, obviously, is China. When we talk about, well, we need some serious and carefully considered regulations on this stuff to prevent it from spinning out of control and killing all of us. And he addresses the Mr. Cox and addresses this with Brett Baer in a second. I will tell you as a preview, I texted Jack and Hansel last night that were blanked. That was your takeaway. It's an F word that rhymes with bucked. And the only thing that can save us is if China does the right thing. In other words, we're bucked. Right. Let's ask Mr. Cox and the ringer of the claxon of doom about China and India and others. So what do you say to the people who look at this and say the American government could potentially put in regulations,
could put in guard rails and could throttle back some companies or set up regulations. But we have no control over what China does, what India does. How do you answer that question? You heard Scott Besson in the piece before this kind of make a similar argument. I think you have to think of this as an arms race. This technology is not ordinary technology. It's not like other other forms of innovation. This is essentially a super weapon. And I think that I expect the international community to be ready to make agreements about how to control the development of super weapon technology. Yeah. That's if you can. I mean, once it starts programming itself, then it will be you against something smarter than you to try to put guard rails on it. Right. Let's have one more clip of this question. If you say it's like an arms race, then we dealt with nuclear weapons and kind of a standoff with mutual assured destruction and worked with allies and enemies to say we've got the stuff to
don't think that you're going to get away with anything. So does that work against what you're saying? What would you like to see happen? Yeah. So unfortunately, we know how to control nuclear weapons pretty much. We don't yet know how to control AI. This is possibly the most dangerous technology that humanity has ever created. It's basically out of science fiction. I think we have no other choice but to cooperate internationally because an arms race would be disastrous in a way that no other, no other human activity has been in the past. I don't, I just don't believe that's possible where you can have an IE IAEA, you know, keeping track of loose nuclear weapon material around the world. And it's fairly easy to tell from space if somebody's, you know, creating, enriching uranium blah, blah, blah, always that just isn't going to happen around AI. Well, and I think Mr. Cox in himself explains why that's going to be so difficult in the next and probably final clip.
You were at open AI before you left them with concerns about security. Now you're at anthrop, you have concerns about security specifically what do you see? If you're talking to somebody on the couch at home, what did you see that said, holy cow, this is the moment I have to speak out. Yeah. So there are two things. One is the models are, the models are getting better very, very quickly. When I think about my work next year, the model, the AI is doing like almost all of my job. The, the air is getting very smart. And the second is that in the recent few months, we've seen that we don't yet know how to control these systems properly. The cyber attacks carried out by opening AI models on, on third party infrastructure were concrete proof that scenarios that we previously thought of as science fiction are going to come true. So what I see is two things, very intelligent AI systems and hard proof that we don't know how to control them. And when you put those two together, it basically spells disasters, as far as I'm concerned. So you know what we haven't gotten to yet. We never got to yesterday. And I haven't heard them.
I'm hoping you can answer this question. Kill us how? All of mankind could be killed within a decade. Virus it creates. It drains our juices because it wants our brains. What happens? Especially mine. Yes, it craves it. Right. I've got a number of phantasmagorical possibilities for you. Okay. Cool. Coming up also a very, very knowledgeable Twitter account that is calling BS on all of this. Good. Good. And his thinking is really, really interesting. Jack Armstrong and Joe. This is the best we can talk show in America. A shocking crime and a cover up at the highest levels of the United States Marine Corps. Someone opened the door and was the primary shooter. Is it possible you could do that and then suppress the number? A new podcast series, fault line Haditha tells the story the United States government wants to keep buried.
How can you not know? There were women and children there. And you got to tell us here that you don't know what happened that day. Based on thousands of pages of previously classified documents and over a hundred hours of secretly filmed video. The truth about one of the most infamous crimes in Marine Corps history can finally be told. If you've got five players and one of them is guilty of murder at least and you offer immunity to the other four, you better be right about the fifth because if you're not, then you've just given immunity to your color. Listen to fault line Haditha on the I Heart Radio app, Apple podcasts or wherever you get your podcasts. Speaking of terrible decisions, AI, is it indeed going to do a humanity? I think it's interesting that Parker Thayer, who are quoting now, who's calling BS on the whole Doomsday deal that we've been describing for the last couple of days. The fellow who quit the two big companies and said, AI is going to kill us all if we're not extremely careful.
Is he think that Doomer view is overrated in general or just this specific thing that happened over the last 24 hours? You know, that's a really interesting question. He doesn't say in general, he could have said it in the past, I'm not familiar with his thinking on this. His response though to the post from Mr. Coxon, who we played earlier in the hour if you didn't get a grab the podcast, subscribe to Armstrong and getting on the band. With Brent Bear. His response to this whole deal was this post looks like the start of a very sophisticated, well-funded PR operation to get support for Democrats to regulate AI into oblivion. Let me show you how it works. And then as we mentioned last segment, this guy's got minimal followers in no previous real account activity. He goes to the Wall Street Journal, publishes his tweet 18 minutes before the post goes up. So the guy coordinated it. It was intentionally wanted attention, which is not proof of anything.
No, he wanted attention to let people know that humanity is people are discussing ending humanity in the hallways that these big companies and you don't know it. That's a good reason to want attention. Yeah, it's maybe now's a good time to remind everybody that proof does not equal, well, I'm sorry, evidence does not equal proof necessarily. Something might seem a little odd, but have a perfectly reasonable explanation. If I was going to blow the whistle on this story and I was smart enough to orchestrate it to get the maximum attention, I've got to. Right. As you quit, you're incredibly lucrative job. That's perhaps a sign of sincerity, not in sincerity. But anyway, he points out, Mr. Thayer points out, within hours, it has tens of thousands of reposts in the account has 100,000 followers. The post is punchy, quotable, professional looking. The first three accounts to quote tweet it, I'll do so within 15 minutes, the initial posting. Remember, this account had basically zero engagement before. So an organic reach explanation seems unlikely.
It's not the sort of popular account that people follow a lot. I don't know how profusely so that is, but according to Grock, those three accounts are Nathan Calvin, who's the general counsel at encode AI, Peter Wilderford, head of policy at the AI policy network, and Dee Cojo, Hello, head of AI futures project, all of which are up and coming AI, Dumer policy advocacy nonprofits. The AI futures project website said is funded primarily by the survival and flourishing fund, which says on its own website that it is advised, Gene Talon, Skype creator and one of the leading investors in Anthropic, to grant over $2.5 million to the future projects since 2024. You could also explain some of that that this guy, Mr. Coxen, who posted the original tweet, is like, all right, how do we most effectively get the word out? We've got to involve all of these people who blah, blah, blah. I don't think showing that it wasn't just a frustrated young man in a foreign ex-sweater went to Twitter,
saying that that wasn't that doesn't necessarily mean it's bull crap, but 100%. I want to hang with his thinking. And there are many, many of that sort of tie-ins with advocacy groups, the first several people to quote tweet him and spread the word. Okay. Gene, and it might not just have been these advocacy groups, hey, did you hear somebody just said something that helps our cause? I want to spread that too. That's right. What they believe in is conclusion for your consideration, friends. Basically, every major Democrat politician in candidate has suddenly glommed onto this post and conveniently as the people cry out faux answers, Bernie Sanders already has a bill written to ban superintelligence and regulate AI into oblivion and we'll be releasing later this week. The bill among many other things will create a new cabinet level federal agency to safeguard the public from the dangers of artificial intelligence.
We'll be advised. Do you think perhaps anthropic and it's many investors who fund AI policy advocacy might have the interest in getting to place a pet expert on the board of an entity that dictates what AI is and what it isn't allowed to do? And isn't it fortuitous that this whistleblower came forward with his oh so scary stories so close and proximity to the release of the most radical piece of AI legislation ever introduced? So the worst thing that could happen in this whole argument is this become like masks or vaccines or there's lots of examples out there when it becomes a oh you want to you think AI is going to ruin the world you must be a Democrat. I mean it becomes a I am for AI because I'm a Republican or whichever party does make which different drink if it becomes a partisan issue and that blinds everybody to everything that is going to be really disturbing and I hope that's not what happens out of this. All right let's end
with a bit of humor. This is a mock ad for a job at anthropic and it's very convincing looking in its graphics speaking of AI. Anthropic careers kill switch engineer San Francisco, California, US 300,000 to 500,000 dollars per year about the role. Listen we just need someone to stand by this sorry I'll get my act together. Listen we just need someone to stand by the servers all day long and unplug them if this thing turns on us. You'll receive extensive training on the code word which we will shout if Claude goes off the deep end and starts overthrowing countries. We expect you to be patient. Know how to unplug things bonus points if you can throw a bucket of water on the servers too just in case and be excited about anthropics approach to AI safety reason. We need to do this switch engineer. Just need to stand next to it. If it goes crazy unplug the damn shout the code word at you. Parakeet. Parakeet. Parakeet. Oh god the arm strong and getting show
a shocking crime and a cover-up at the highest levels of the United States Marine Corps. Someone opened the door and was the primary shooter. Is it possible you could do that and then a new podcast series. Fault line Haditha tells the story the United States government wants to keep buried. How can you not know there were women and children there? You're going to tell us here that you don't know what happened that day? Based on thousands of pages of previously classified documents and over a hundred hours of secretly filmed video. The truth about one of the most infamous crimes in Marine Corps history can finally be told. If you've got five players and one of them is guilty of murder at least and you offer immunity to the other four you better be right about the fifth because if you're not then you've just given immunity to your color. Listen to fault line Haditha on the Lie Heart radio app Apple podcasts or wherever you get your podcasts. My head is bleeding which is not a good look. Hey Jack. Can't you? Can't help but notice the open wound.
Um I was uh that my parents house and they have a mini van and I was getting something out of the back and I been over too soon as the van lid opened up and hit my head on that sharp latch thing. I don't know how many times I've done that they need to make the latch on vehicles less sharp because it's the most likely thing to hit your head on. Is there a way to make it less sharp? Anyway this is your new cause give generously. Yeah. How did you do my head? So Marco Rubio Rubio and I and Jack for that matter share something in common. We despise communists, Marxism coming up the most dangerous intellectual of the 20th century. Not the most famous or the most red you probably never heard his name but in terms of damage done I would argue and not more dangerous than Marx because you used Marx's ideas but uh one of the most damaging people who's ever lived on earth we will explain. He says quoted his Marx but people don't know it. Yeah yeah indeed his his marching orders are absolutely the marching orders of the degenerate
woe cleft. And by the way before we start Marco Rubio yesterday talking about communism it looked to me like he was speaking off the top of his head. Yeah which is pretty impressive given what you're about to hear. Yeah he's given a speech at a forum I can't remember which one it doesn't really matter but uh will Marco speak for himself? I'm gonna give a speech I've never given before. I hate Marxism and I hate communism and I hate it because everywhere in the world it's ever been tried it's led to tyranny and poverty and exile and oppression and there's a mistake that people have made maybe some of us maybe and myself have been guilty of it and that is the belief that somehow Marxism is dead. That Marxism is now something that crazy people at the faculty club at some university talk about but it isn't really alive anymore. The other mistake we make is that Marxism is some sort of economic theory. Neither one of those things is true. Marxism is not dead and it's not an economic theory. What's happened is that Marxists realize what the track record of Marxism
is around the world so they don't want to call themselves Marxists anymore. They have found new titles things that frankly sound benign and you almost feel guilty being against social justice who can be against social justice but that's a terminology they come up with equity equity who can be against equity. Go on Marco you got to hit a steam but the truth of the matter is that and and that this is not about economic solely the old Marxism was the argument that the capitalist system the whole system was flawed and rigged and it divided people it made it said the world and society and capitalist societies are divided between two groups. You have one group which owns the businesses they are the oppressors and you have the workers everybody else that group are the victims and that's how communism works it creates a victim class it creates an oppressor class and then it says the only way to fix this is we have to overthrow this system we need a revolution we need a government to take over and make everything fair and we need a government that goes to the former
oppressors and makes them apologize for being an oppressors be reeducated into responsible people and pay a penance for what they've done that's the old Marxism and it sounds familiar take it home Marco take it home because today we are being asked to divide first of all we're being told that America in and of itself was founded on racism prejudice and evil not that we have a history of racism or prejudice but that we were founded on that that's the that's the foundation of our society that we are irredeemably broken in our history system that the system is rigged not about capitalism the system is set up to benefit the oppressor versus the victim and who's the oppressor the oppressor basically if you listen to some of these people as anyone who is a white male heterosexual and everybody else i guess myself included being a Cuban American is a victim and the only answer is for government to step forward and create equity and make things fair
i was pretty good off the top of your head which is sure looked like he was speaking and i have visions of a Marco Rubio Rama manual debate for the presidency that would make our last several rounds of debates seem extra extra ridiculous oh yes i would agree yes who's got a better golf game for instance perhaps the low moment in the history of the republic so marches have made a couple of adjustments in the 20th century number one the workers of the world unite didn't work and and so they decided all right anybody with any gripe of the world unite and we will join with them in their gripe to overthrow the system no matter how disparate or or oppositional it is that's how you get queers for Palestine which is just an absurdity but you know fundamentalist Muslims want to overthrow the system and like really angry sexual minority types want to overthrow the system so let's work together that's that's the
whole of it okay and then the second adjustment came courtesy of Antonio Gramsci who and i love this torder accounts one of my favorites Christoph of Poland his last name has roughly 37 consonants in it but he's absolutely a wonderful writer and i'm going to quote him now Gramsci was the most dangerous intellectual of the 20th century not the most famous not the most red the most dangerous and the most consequential because he was the one who figured out why the revolution kept falling failing and what to do instead this is the man who invented the long march through the institutions which if you've studied communism Marxism is a familiar phrase even if you don't know quite what it means but everything that followed and this may be familiar to some of you the Frankfurt school the Fabian society's operational model uh the captured university the HR department enforcing approved speech they're all downstream of what he wrote in a prison cell
between 1929 and 1935 he's being held in Mussolini's Italy as a communist so his central question was why hasn't the revolution happened the glorious revolution the working class was supposed to rise the contradictions of capitalism were supposed to produce the revolution but they hadn't not in the west and Gramsci's answer was precise and devastating it was because the ruling class does not maintain power through force alone it maintains power through cultural hegemony control of the ideas the values the frameworks that we used to understand our world so the worker who accepts that the existing order is simply how things are will not revolt regardless of if he's exploited so the revolution requires cultural change first and the instrument to do that was the long march through the institutions not not storming a barricade the school being the university the media the judiciary the civil service the cultural establishment every institution that a civilization uses to
transmit its values to the next generation capture these and fill them with people who share the counter hegemonic project and the cultural assumptions that maintain the existing order gradually dissolve no more barricades no visible moment of rupture just a slow replacement of one cultural hegemony with another hence friends the idea that showing up on time is white supremacy and racism is one of the most serious charges you can level in America working hard well saying America's land of opportunity this is all racism you know there are a thousand examples you've you've seen it good manners or racism asking somebody to hand in their homework on time that's racism that's why they say this they're trying to dismantle the norms of our civilization through long march through the institutions well some of those examples you gave there are obviously ridiculous and haven't caught on yet with most people but in general the the general United States is a bad country and were the
cause of all bad things it has caught on and it is now the culture and I read that thing too and what I thought was so interesting well one it's he's been successful him and his crowd have been successful they've already done it it's why you're so up against it if you talk to somebody that's come through our current public schools and colleges they're in that position he was trying to get rid of where well they just feel like well yeah because everything's this way and always has been this way I mean it's so intellectually and culturally a part of their world that the United States is a bad country and capitalism is bad and every every all white men are racist and all that sort of stuff but they you can't even you can't hope to have an argument with them right right so Christophe points out the educational capture was the masterpiece controlling the curriculum and if you control the curriculum you control the categories of thought available to the next generation and it's not as simple as just telling them what to conclude you shape the questions that they
think to ask you shape what they consider obvious like Jack just pointed out you shape what they consider unthinkable the generation educated after the long march does not need to be told what to think it thinks what it was formed to think you know people like this is that thinking is their own I know people like this yeah they they have been so into it for so long surrounded by people who also are so into it it's just like psych a fish doesn't always wet I mean it's just it's their whole world yeah and and and it's disturbing because like I said you can't sit down one of these people and change their mind it's going to take a lot along march through the institution the other direction to turn this around and a Gramsey or Gramsky um you you have to salute his brilliance because he also theorized in his writings from prison what he called the organic intellectual the person who translates the theoretical theoretical framework into stories and assumptions that
circulates throughout the culture but don't even appear ideological the film that makes the existing order seem absurd the journalist who frames every story within the approved assumptions Gramsky understood that culture is politics by other means and that the side that controls the culture wins regardless of who wins the elections and you know any Christoph addresses whether it's a conspiracy theory I mean it is in a way but it's as I often say these people wrote books their names are on the spines they said precisely what they wanted to do and how they were going to do it now they're doing it um but it's a published documented widely taught strategy that the left implemented consciously across the entire western world the 1968 generation put it into practice in the universities they became the professors the journalists the civil servants the judges the HR directors of the decades that followed and the march took 50 years but it works yeah it worked you know I as soon as I read this I thought you know a smaller version of this for conservatives
was the way and I think they were using this phrase uh use the federal society with the long march through the judges in the judicial to get rovers's weight overturned they had this goal decades ago to start with judges at the very bottom and work so you get to the point that it's just so much of the judicial branch that you could get to where rovers is way over they they did the same thing um it really works but you have to be incredibly patient you have to play a long game boy and we're up against it now because I have it on very very good authority that the law schools of America are practically exclusively left we'll be talking left left we're going to be talking to Tim sand for later this week about a different topic but yeah we can ask him about that because he's been explaining that to us for years now and that's horrifying it'll take a long march the other direction to turn that around and all those lawyers that graduate and they're going out into the world doing their thing with a completely different world view than you've got
yeah yeah Christoff's last a couple of sentences are the counter march has begun it just doesn't have a name yet uh and he's right awareness is up I read uh this morning that uh the uh number of kids homeschooled in New York has increased by 200% in the last 10 12 years um people are becoming aware but uh boy it's gonna be a long fight that's fine I got nothing better to do it was very clever on that dudes part brilliant man absolutely brilliant he understood humans in societies and cultures I mean brilliant evil evil completely evil but brilliant we've decided to call this the best weekend talk show in America and if you like it download Armstrong you get it on demand a shocking crime and a cover-up at the highest levels of the United States Marine Corps someone opened the door and was the primary sugar is it possible you could do that
and then suppress the number a new podcast series fault line Haditha tells the story the United States government wants to keep buried how can you not know there were women and children there and you can tell us here that you don't know what happened that day based on thousands of pages of previously classified documents and over a hundred hours of secretly filmed video the truth about one of the most infamous crimes in Marine Corps history can finally be told if you've got five players and one of them is guilty of murder at least and you offer immunity to the other four you better be right about the fifth because if you're not then you've just given immunity to your color listen to fault line Haditha on the lie heart radio app apple podcasts or wherever you get your podcasts here's your freedom loving quote of the day Marty and beautiful Lincoln California sent along a quote from Thomas Sole from his book Wealth Poverty and Politics as part of the Sole section in my library did I mention to you I got my big partred of Thomas Sole
for my study what's joining or well and HL Mankin so far in my gallery of my what do you do in your study of your study of your study very little actually I mostly watch stupid YouTube videos now I do all sorts of stuff in there let's see anyway from Sole poverty occurs automatically it is wealth that must be produced yeah so worth remembering mailbag Joe G from Reno wrote to us at mailbag at Armstrongygeti.com he really enjoyed our segment on Senorai Gramsky the fellow who coined the term Antonio Gramsky the long march through the institution institution right who realized the only way to get Marxism really you know when was to start infecting the schools and the media and you know education general and you've got to change the culture to change the politics to revolutionary Marxism and he's been incredibly successful if you missed it grab the podcast Armstrongygeti on demand you
to subscribe but anyway Joe G says I was listening to the podcast found the piece on Gramsky very interesting you probably got a thousand emails reminding you that boot edge edge his father was a promoter and archivist of Gramsky's work I actually didn't know that well my guess is that was a major selling point on pizza resume the streak of Marxism and the democratic party is nothing new I also found these sex robot story fascinating I'm strong you get you one more thing you get that by subscribing to Armstrongygeti on demand I'm always looking for new idea to make money wondering if a sex robot rental business would work you know what they say never buy a bow to plane or a sex robot when you can rent it I was an outspraight with a little free free breeze and you're good to go free with a little for breeze and you're ready to go oh that's disgusting we've got Joe G from Reno well done we've got more on the explosion and technology with sex robots coming up Bill of Fullerton who says he listens every day thanks very much Bill writes how dis a i s gonna kill
I believe that's a reference to what a clip top an aia shiti yeah yeah that's almost definitely the clip here anyway giant armies of autonomous autonomous self-improving a i robots what could possibly go wrong Chinese a i robots marching across the land why our young men who should be fighting are having sex with a i sex dolls oh boy things are getting weird I think getting weird fast you think so Gary with a fabulous note it's quite long with a bunch of examples I'm going to mine it for more on the topic of a i doom says I believe a i's last words will be oops sorry wrong again and he gives a bunch of examples of inquiries he's made I got one from last night yeah to a i and he challenged it and for instance it says no I wasn't trying to predict the future I gave an incorrect apparently future looking statement and he said well wait a minute this yes if I previously told you that hurricane lowell was a category one hurricane that
was incorrect I'm sorry right I did this I said when's the last time he did the democrats are republicans one uh the house two elections in a row because we're going back at fourth a lot and it said it's only happened twice and since nineteen whatever I said well didn't the democrats control the house for like forty five years oh yeah my bad they won every election between nineteen so I mean it was hilariously wrong and I mean not even close to right like and only because I know something about the subject so how about when I ask about medicine or something like that when I don't know anything about the subject all powerful uncontrollable and pig ignorant great where do I sign up came across a Twitter thread sent along by a beloved listener actually that was saying hey the AI doomerism come on Michael we've seen your thread we will share it with the folks coming up let's see on the topic of the midtermapalooza sacroterian rights I try to be
optimistic but y'all are right trump delivers tactical wins then immediately undermines them border security critical mineral supply chain infrastructure deals each followed by white house chaos nepotistic contracts are inflammatory rhetoric the poisons the accomplishment the core issue isn't competence its personality I just appreciate the fact that pandering is now just very frank and straightforward they no longer hide it anymore I'll give you five grand yeah I'll give you seven five hundred trump and get it I believe that whoever was in that room and did that was a murder a new podcast series fault line hadita tells the story of a shocking crime and a cover up at the highest levels of the United States Marine Corps if you've got five players and you offer immunity to four you better be right about the fifth because if you're not then you've just given immunity to your
listen to fault line hadita on the iHeart radio app apple podcasts or wherever you get your podcasts
More episodes
More from Armstrong & Getty On Demand

The Best Weekend Talk Show In America Hour One
Armstrong & Getty On Demand

That Was A Quick Hanging
Armstrong & Getty On Demand

The Great Hope Of Civilization
Armstrong & Getty On Demand

They'll Assume You're Gay
Armstrong & Getty On Demand