
About this episode
Armstrong & Getty On Demand is made possible by:
Hour 3 of A&G features...
- Jurors in the Lindsay Clancy trial speak out
- Gestational twins!
- Fundamental Islam on the rise & the 9/11 anniversary
- New foldable iPhone & man purses
Stupid Should Hurt: https://www.armstrongandgetty.com/
See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
Get every episode summarized
Each time Armstrong & Getty On Demand publishes, we email you a written briefing from the transcript — the topics, who appeared, and any specific claims, with the ad reads skipped.
Email me new episodesFree for 3 shows. No card needed.
Hosts & guests
Transcript ready
680 searchable segments. Every word is indexed and playable.
Full transcript
Armstrong & Getty On Demand — Nice Purse. Machine-transcribed; use the interactive transcript above to jump the player to any line.
This is an I Heart Podcast. Guaranteed Human. Broadcasting Live from the Abraham Lincoln Radio Studio, the George Washington Broadcast Center. Yeah, Armstrong and Joe Gatti. I'm Strong and Gatti. And now he is Armstrong and Gatti. Three of the 12 jurors are speaking out about the events that led to the Miss Trial and Massachusetts revealing the panel was deadlocked 11 to 1. Three female jurors went on in those interviews on TV to describe that their arguments got so loud that the six alternate could actually hear them outside the room. They went on to say that the soul hold out refused to listen to the rest of the jurors, saying nurses on the panel. So we're about to hear from the three females who have done some interviews.
You have any thoughts on stuff you've heard so far about the conversations as a former juror? Just the idea that they should pay special regard to nurses. I find interesting. I wouldn't say it's ridiculous, but it's not a compelling argument. Anyway, I was here from some of these jurors. He was very arrogant. He really did not take anything that anybody said. The nurses, he tried to ask a question about the medications and we went back to the report from social hospital. We had the toxicology report. We could see exactly the amounts. The nurses in the room spoke to that and talked to the jury. There were nurses on the jury. They spoke to that specific thing. That was a question that he had. And he just completely disregarded the information that they gave him. So I think we're going to have to go through these before we get into our conversation.
Sure. Roll on. I mean, he had reasonable doubt. He admitted he had reasonable doubt. After we watched that video of the interview, I think that's what it was. He admitted he had reasonable doubt. I started filling out the forms. I was so excited. I actually did with three forms I had a fill out. And I started filling them out. I wrote my signature on each one. And then he said, but I'm still not going to say that she's not guilty by reason of incident. So okay. I'm having trouble keeping my head wrapped around this in the same way that I can't deal with time changes very well. I can't ever figure out what spring forward fallback means. I'm having trouble with this one. And so in most states, I killed somebody and I don't want the chair. I got to convince the jury. I'm crazy. That's correct. But in Massachusetts, it's what?
Not only is it the prosecution's duty to prove that the defendant was criminally responsible at the time of offense, they must prove it beyond a reasonable doubt. So the same standard that applies for a conviction where the government takes away your freedom or your money or whatever applies to whether you are criminally responsible or not. But so like if I, that's a high bar. But there if I say I'm crazy, they got to prove I'm not crazy. Correct. The prosecution does. Yeah. Wherever you ask, everywhere else, the defense has to prove they're trying to get me all, keep me from getting the chair. They have to prove I'm crazy. And the jury, they're not understanding is Massachusetts is an extremely rare case of that. But in Massachusetts, if I say I'm crazy, you have to assume he's crazy unless somebody can prove beyond a reasonable doubt, he's not. Right. Wow, that's a really different way to approach it.
Wow. One more juror. Not sure if rogue is the right word, so. But every one of us in the hours of a frustration would get up and walk the room. Because you just couldn't sit anymore. And would all go out of the cart with the exhibits. He, I think got up to the cart once very quickly and went back to a seat. He would not, he would not interact with us and and try to understand. We read him on numerous occasions, the definition of a reasonable doubt from Judge Sullivan's instruction. He actually said one day in the end, well, why don't we have the judge coming and read it again? And we were like, no, we have it in front of us. We don't need that. And we would highlight it. And, you know, so and so this is the definition of a reasonable doubt.
But he had the hardest time getting off the fact that Lindsey viciously killed her children. Yeah. Well, you know, I can understand why it's a difficult thing to get past. The fact that she strangled three little kids and you had to look at their pictures over and over again and all that sort of stuff. And that leaves a mark. But for the whole, I didn't follow trial every single day. It's hard for me to imagine how you could prove to me beyond a reasonable doubt that she's not crazy. All right. There are 14, maybe 15 states where the burden is on the state. Once the defense, defense introduces credible evidence of mental defect, the prosecution must prove the defendant's sanity beyond a reasonable doubt. That is an odd thing to demand. Thirty the other states, except for five, I'm sorry, except for four say the defendant bears the burden approving they were insane, usually by a preponderance of evidence or clear and
convincing evidence. So it's interesting that the few states, including Massachusetts, that put the burden on the prosecution, not only put the burden on the prosecution, but they have a much higher standard. There are four states, Idaho, Kansas, Montana, and Utah that do not permit a traditional insanity defense at all. I don't know how that works. Exactly. If you're completely fruit loops. But yeah, that's it. It is the absolutely underdiscus to apps, the aspect of this trial. Well, so there are five charges that they had available to them. Those 11 wanted which one? A quiddle, which would have been she walks out of the courtroom? No, no. Years and years and years of care in a mental health facility with annual appraisals of whether she was a danger to herself and others. Keeping in mind this woman is now apparently allegedly completely sane and is completely aware she choked her three children to death.
Yeah. So at the point, she's no longer a suicide risk. Call me at home. I'm not going to wait for your call. Yeah, that's a lot of people have commented on that. She's just, she's no longer a danger to society. Um, um, she doesn't give birth to another child. Yeah, we got one text who said, how is she not like, you got to keep me locked up? I mean, look, look, look, look, look what I'm capable of. Just I can snap and do this sort of thing. There's something wrong with me. Yeah. Horrible. Yeah, it's what a weird thing all the way around. So what do you think of the whole about? You think he was just, um, uh, letting his disgust with what she did override his following the law? I'm conflicted here because I agree with his conclusion.
On the other hand, it seems to me a pretty clear case of what they'll sometimes call jury nullification where the jurors says, yeah, I understand that's the law, but the law sucks. I'm not going to be party to it. And that shouldn't happen. It was, it's just, it's not a good thing to happen in general. Um, that's not your job as a juror, but I understand. Oh, and this is an extreme case. Oh, yeah. Oh, no way. I don't care what you say. I can't vote to equip this woman. Right. I've seen the pictures. I know what she did. Yeah. Like I said, I can understand it. Oh, that's a rough one. So do you have more on that topic or I thought this was about as well put an expression of the sentiment I have come across. I do not know this gal's name, but here she is 68 Michael. Okay. With this lazy client to trial, I feel like maybe I missed the mark because I've been seeing all of y'all's videos and I'm just, I'm just a woman. So maybe I just didn't understand fully. So help me out here. Okay. Because what I have gathered from all of your information that you've put out there is
that women are fully incapable of self governing our emotions and our hormones. So if we murder someone or multiple people, it is absolutely not our fault. It is because of our emotions and our hormones that made us do it because we cannot control it. Unless we went to the doctor and we got put on medication for these hormones and emotions. But then it's the medications fault. It's not our fault. It's not our hormones and emotions fault anymore because we're on medicine for it. And so then it's the medicine's fault if we murder someone. Unless it's the wrong medicine, too much medicine, not enough medicine, then it's the doctor's fault. It's definitely not our fault as women. It is the doctor's fault or the medications fault or hormones and emotions. But you know what else we are? We are women. We are to be respected. We are to be seen as equal to men. We can do every job that a man can do. We can be the next president. We can be police officers. We can be in hospital jobs with weapons. Unless our hormones, unless our hormones get crazy because then our emotions are hormones
could cause us to pop off and act some type of way. But it's not our fault. It's not our fault. It is our hormones and our emotions. Unless we're on medicine, then it's the medication. Unless it's the wrong medicine, too much medicine, not enough medicine, then it's the doctors. That's pretty good. That's pretty damn good. Yeah. The response would be, well, postpartum psychosis is a very limited and specific diagnosis of a very specific malady. It's not just emotions and hormones, et cetera, et cetera. On the other hand, the takeaway culturally is pretty much what she said. Well, and then there's been this blurring the lines of postpartum psychosis versus postpartum depression, which is where I think a lot of the support comes in from the various women or us, the country holding their babies up on TikTok saying, me too, or whatever, which is just discussing Lindsey. But her lawyer yesterday, I saw him on one of the TV shows saying, maybe now we can move out of the dark ages with the way we handle postpartum depression.
So he blurred the lines between postpartum depression and psychosis and claims we're living in the dark ages with the way we handle treat women over this smart lawyer. I bet he played that in the courtroom, too. I don't know. I haven't read the transcript. Lori's preparing for the next go round for. Yeah. Certainly possible. I, this one is so thorny and disturbing. If someone said to me, look, all of this is really interesting. But if I design a society, it's going to say if you murder your children, you're going away for good. I would say to that person, yeah, yeah, I see your point. And I think 90% of people would agree with that. Hard to say. It is hard to say. You can get hammered drunk. You killed somebody. You're guilty. You don't get to say I was drunk. I was out of my mind. I don't even remember it. I don't even know what happened. How about you completely lose your temper and see red? You're in a state you may never be in again as long as you live, but you have murderous
rage for two minutes and person ends up dead. You're guilty. If you're that and drunk, you're guilty. Yeah. And that woman, that little thing she laid out, she was good. She needs to have her own talk show or something. No, she'd compete with us. She sucks, boo. Well, ladies and germs, the weight is over for one brand of pro football coming back tonight. Football is here and so is Draft Kings. Draft Kings is now live in all 50 states, one app, every sport nationwide. New Draft Kings customers sign up with the code Armstrong spend five bucks to get $200 in rewards within 21 days, includes all markets. That's code of Armstrong in partnership with Draft Kings. The crown is yours. Gambling problem call 1-800-Gamber, 1-800-MyReset, Connecticut, call 888-7897-777, visit ccpg.org. On behalf of Boothulcasino in Kansas, Bettax Passthrough may apply in Illinois, 21 plus, Void in Canada. Bet with Draft Kings Sportsbook to get bonus bets that expire in seven days or trade with Draft Kings predictions to get predictions dollars that expire in one year.
Event contract trading involves risk of loss. Predictions offer void in New York. Even with drawable rewards issued as $50 click to claims every seven days for 21 days. Terms at dkng.co slash offer, limited time offer nationwide based on sportsbook predictions and free-to-play sports contest availability varies by state. Apple show today with one of the biggest debuts in many, many years. So I'll get to that a little bit later. April plus next half hour, a, a good deal of information on the theme of as we approach the 25th anniversary of 9-11 radical Islam is on the march and it's on the march in the United States and y'all to know about it. And we have some incredibly compelling testimony from the mouths of reformed Muslims who would like to make it clear exactly what the risks are. So I hope you can stay tuned for that. One more piece this century's nightmare. That's right. That's true.
A quick note, fire, the foundation for individual rights and expression are out with their college free speech rankings and 121 out of the 261 schools got an F for their speech climate. We'll be diving in the next. The kids got an A. So true. Yeah, the percentages of the students who find shouting down a speaker or blocking people from attending or using violence to stop them from speaking. The number of kids you find that acceptable will shock you to your core if you'd like to be shocked to your core. But first this story on Australian woman has given birth to twins conceived by separate fathers. Oh boy. Katie, that was exactly the sort of look that was that was wait, what? Yeah, the math isn't mathing how? And what is believed to be the country's first such case, the mother from Queensland was carrying a couple's IVF embryo when she became pregnant in the natural fashion last year.
What? Well, for all we know, she is entirely monogamous and reliable as a partner. I jumped to conclusions. And yet, and yet a surrogate mother. So she gave birth to a boy which was hers and a girl which was a different couples as she was the surrogate. Wow. In November of last year, apparently, are they considered brother and sister? There was that's a great question. There's no dispute over parenthood and the couples have been raising their children separately since their birth. But the case became public because the police just split ways that's been real. It's been fun, but ain't been real fun. See you later. Good hang. Yeah. Yeah. Hey, you're a good roommate. I appreciate the courtesy, but I'm off. Yeah, exactly. So this is in court now because the state has surrogacy laws that ban the separation of birth
siblings. You can't become a breeding cell and just knock out as many kids twins or triplets or whatever and sell each one to a different couple or whatever. They have laws against that. So one judge is ruled that the babies were not birth siblings under the laws in the unique case. They were gestational twins. So who knows? Sounds like I complicated quickly. Yeah. Yeah. You're all ready pregnant. Don't be going to have insects with some other. Of course, you probably didn't think I could get pregnant again. Oh, right. Why was she off you lay if you have sex with your pregnant? Hey, you, why are you off you lay? You know, like if you have sex with your pregnant wife, you don't think, oh, God, this is going to lead to twins. You don't think that or maybe two babies three months apart or six months or maybe a baby every month and a half. Your wife would kill you for that and you would deserve it. Yeah. Yeah.
Yeah. You know what we don't have time for? You can figure out the rest. This is, this story comes out every few years. Silicon Valley executives are big tech fans, but not for their own kids. The number of tech heavyweights who say no freaking way, my 14 year olds on social media, it ought to get you damn attention. Wow. That maybe in the hour four we can get into that sobering and I hate being sobered. Coming up next half hour though, the 9 11 families by the hundreds and hundreds and hundreds are saying to mom Donnie stay away and I think they got a damn good case. We'll get into that. If you miss it, get the podcast Armstrong and get it on demand. Armstrong and get it. Mayor mom Donnie plans to actually attend the September 11th ceremony is marking the 25th anniversary of the terrorist attacks. But this is nice. 19 of his family members are also flying in. Wow. That's a heck of a joke.
I'm very good for you. Now you're supporting him. We're going to get back to the question of mom Donnie at the 9 11 festivities in a moment or two. We've been talking a fair amount about the AI dooms today, including a fellow just quit anthropic. And that may or may not come to visit mankind, but I will tell you this with 100% certainty there is a massive worldwide political movement that aims to conquer the Western world in the name of a brutal fundamentalist religion slash political system that is called Islam. Fundamentalist Islam is on the march and they're in the United States and large numbers. And if we these 25 years after 9 11 have forgotten that it's time to remember in a big damn hurry for a couple of reasons. Number one, the threats never gone away. And number two, we're talking the other day about how in the Communist Manifesto, Mark says we will support any movement that aims to overthrow the current political and social structures. And as from the perspective of a Marxist, I see fundamentalist Islam as holy cow.
They got the numbers. They've got the fervor. They're absolutely adamant that they want to overthrow the current system. They're willing to die for their cause. Oh yeah, exactly. They're the perfect allies. And then when the system falls, we got to make sure we get them but quick because they're brutal. Meanwhile, the fundamentalist Muslims are thinking the same thing about the communists and the winds is an open question in the places where they're successful. I aim to do whatever little I can to make them not successful in the United States of America. So having open with that, a little context to the discussion. Well, Samma bin Laden and his hijackers are killing more people now or in the past several years than they killed on 9 11. The number of 9 11 cancer victims has skyrocketed about 1700 percent over the past decade fueled by rare variations of cancer, according to stats released as the 25th anniversary.
Nears. That's the cancer that John Stewart spent on for all these years in New York. Yeah, to his credit. Cancer certifications among twin tower survivors, downtown Manhattan residents and workers on or near the pile have exploded from 3,200 in 2015 to 57,000 plus this year for the obvious reasons that cancer takes a while to develop from whatever cause. Do they know what they were breathing in that caused it? Probably 150 different things that are suspected or known to have caused the cancer. They're losing two clients a day and see a new cancer certification every 50 minutes. This is a law firm that represents survivors. For the first time, the number of cancer cases among survivors who resided in and around et cetera has now surpassed the number of emergency responders such as firefighters and police who had prolonged exposure. So it's just everybody in the area now. Some have been logged in and fundamentalist Islam are continuing to kill Americans thanks
to 9-11. So, you know, let's get into Lauren Green's report from special report last night as the next step in our discussion. My message to Mayor Montani is, dude, we don't want you to come. We are asking respectfully that he not show up. 9-11 found the members and first responders stood on the steps of New York City Hall, building pictures of loved ones murdered by radical Islamic terrorists 25 years ago at the World Trade Center. They're increasing the pressure on Mayor Zor and Mamdani not to attend Friday's remembrance ceremony. I don't know why he's so animate about going to this one. Let us have our morning and understand that this is sacred and hallowed space. But Mayor Mamdani is standing firm on going. Well, it would probably be it for me to stand up for Mayor Mamdani, but I feel like if he had announced he wasn't going to go a while back, he'd be getting killed for that as the Mayor of New York to not go on the 25th anniversary. I agree. It is a conundrum.
And also in, if he were to back down in the face of this controversy, he would be admitting, you know what, people have a legitimate gripe. I'm not a reformed Muslim. I'm not a, I believe in fundamentalist Islam and in bent on it being promoted, which I believe he is. I think we could have, if he'd announced I'm not going prior to the flap, I think it would have been seen as he's a fundamentalist Muslim who's not willing to honor the death of. Yeah. Yeah, he can't win because he is precisely what he appears to be to wit. You're looking for a chief legal advisor, chief counsel for the city. How many lawyers are there in New York City? Eight million. It might be half a million, right? Okay. Let's hear about who he chose. A centerpiece of the controversy is the Mayor's appointment of Ramzi Kassam as the city's chief legal counsel. Kassam had represented a convicted al-Qaeda member whose brother-in-law was one of the 9-11 attackers. He was with mom Donnie Friday, when the Mayor signed an executive order, designating
September 11 as an official day of remembrance and service. The Mayor also signed an order to increase security and create a task force to help respond to potential threats. The advocacy group September 11th, Families for Peaceful Tomorrow says, quote, firmly supports the presence at Ground Zero of anyone who comes to pay their respects and believes mom Donnie has consistently affirmed his intentions to honor victims, survivors and first responders. The person's brother-in-law was one of the attackers on the plane. This guy, okay, so I'm a moderate Muslim elected to high office. I'm looking for a chief legal counsel. Here's this guy who made his bones defending al-Qaeda. Let's go with him, says I. Are you kidding me? His brother-in-law was actually on one of the planes? What? I'm a Muslim doctor who treats 9-11 victims. Why I'm outraged by Hassan Piker's venom?
This is not about Hassan Piker really, but it was written. It was published recently in the New York Post. I'm an observing Muslim woman, British by birth, American by privilege, who witnessed 9-11 in real time. That was my introduction to radical Islam, a profound distortion of my faith. Today, as a doctor, it treats 9-11 first responders and survivors as a consulting sleep specialist, etc. I see the long-term impacts of the horrific day close up. It outraged me deeply. The here 9-11 vilified by far left democratic twitch mouthpiece, Hassan Piker, who's casually declared that America deserve 9-11. He's trying to backtrack on his comments just in time for the 25th anniversary of those heinous facts. As a Muslim who rejects Islamism, I must speak out against this venom. And she goes into the absolute horrific toll on Americans during the event and after she goes into the long list of cancers and other maladies breathing. I mean, if the number were merely breathing troubles, diseases and not cancer, it would
still be absolutely horrifying. And she, her takeaway is that Islamism is a threat for moderate Muslims too, absolutely. And they need to speak out against it or the wave is going to crest over all of us. I think it's a very brave piece to write. There is a price on her head for sure. Oh, absolutely. There's also a price on the head of, I said I was going to remember it, Danny Burwami, Burmawi, sorry, who left the religion of Islam. And there so he's an apostate. He is, he is dead according to fundamentalist Islam too. And he writes, our bad Muslims, bad because of Islam. And he says, the answer is yes. You can read much of my work, which proves beyond a shred of doubt that the worst acts committed by Muslims from the beheadings of infidels to lying, rape, exploitation, corruption, dictatorship,
the oppression of women, child abuse and so forth are rooted in Islamic teachings. Not merely in descriptive passages, but in prescriptive ones. Yes, all humans have the capacity for evil. We all have within us the ability to justify unspeakable horrors. Most religions restrain human evil. They set moral boundaries condemning acts of violence, injustice and cruelty. Christianity commands its followers to love their enemies, forgive those who harm them in refuse vengeance. Judaism, despite its history of persecution, never formed a doctrine commanding global conquester the extermination of non-Jews. Islam, however, does the opposite. And he makes a rather compelling case, paragraph after paragraph after paragraph, trying to alert the West that these people are serious. They are willing to kill. They are willing to die. They are well organized and they're coming. And it's not paranoia, it's not xenophobia, it's not bigotry. It's a political movement. You're worried about communism, you should be. If you're on the left and you're worried about fascism, there could be no more strict
and brutal form of fascism than this. I suppose we'll be talking about this more on Friday is the anniversary of 9-11. And we like round numbers and quarters and three quarters for some reason. We share. But how about the week after 9-11 and you just said 25 years later, the Taliban will still be in charge of Afghanistan? You thought, how would that be possible? Yeah. So the great God sawd, I wish you had a different name because it sounds like I'm wrapping or something and the way it's spelled. He's a Middle Eastern Christian who became a Canadian academic but Canada is so woke. He's now in America and welcome Dr. But he's always written a book recently called Suicidal Empathy and that's the tendency of the West to believe if we judge anyone or don't permit anyone to come in or if we
don't extend all of our rights and openness to everyone that we're bad people. We should empathize with them. Here's a great example of it. Columbia University's prestigious Knight First Amendment Institute is holding a symposium on the eve of the 25th anniversary of 9-11. And the symposium will feature Mosin Madawi, the Palestinian student protest leader who was recently exposed for championing the annihilation of all Jews worldwide and supporting terrorist organizations. He and others will examine how post 9-11 the war on terror the forever war has stifled free speech. It will also provide a sympathetic platform to a man facing a deportation order who wants promised to annihilate the Jews. Okay. Okay. Columbia. So Mamdani is going to show up on Friday to something. He has to. Yeah. As you made the point. Yeah. Yeah. Boy, if he gets booed, that's going to be quite the, quite the deal, quite the scene.
Yeah. And that the final note in Lauren Green's report was another 9-11 commemorative group said, look, anybody wants to come with an open heart and more in the death and destruction will have them there. I like that spirit. That's a nice spirit. But when empathize, empathy becomes suicidal empathy, then you're making a terrible terrible mistake. We'll have to see what happens Friday. I'll tell you what, if you've never read it, the 9-11 commission report, when they put that book out, it reads like a thriller. I mean, you don't want to get through the whole thing because it gets really, unless you're a real super into it. But that first chapter of just that day and what went down the way they wrote it, it's thrilling. I might re, in fact, I will. I'll reread it before Friday and bring you some of the highlights in case you forget forgotten them. It's, it's something else. My other favorite book on that topic is The Looming Tower.
Oh, yeah. Al Qaeda in the road to 9-11 by Lawrence Wright. And I know we should have a list of recommended books. We've never been able to get our act together. We'll work on it. But I said for the 500th half, yes. The 9-11 report is basically just a news, news account of what happened after doing all the research. And it's again, written like a thriller. I'll get into some of the highlights from that on Friday, including my favorite part. What's the current CIA director at the time said as soon as he heard the news. I love that part. Anyway, apples have one of their big events today as they usually do in September. Biggest one they've had in a very, very long time for one of the most valuable companies on the, in the world. Tell you why next. Armstrong and Getty. Some business news tomorrow, Apple has said to debut its first foldable phone and it costs up to $3,000. Or $6,000 if you forget which way it folds.
So yeah, apples doing their usual September thing. They haven't launched anything that was wow in many, many years. Two things today and this will have an effect on your 401k. It's one of the most valuable companies in the world driving the stock markets crazy rise over the last several years. They got their new CEO and the foldable phone coming out, which is the biggest new product thing they've had in a very, very long time is they've just been tweaking phones for quite some time. Anyway, the other companies already have some foldable phones. We'll see what apples is like. I don't know where he got upward to $3,000. I do a lot of the Apple rumor sites for this stuff and it's supposed to be around two grand, which is plenty. I mean, that's a lot. That's a lot for a phone. Do I want to, you know, you're already paying $1,200 if you're getting a pro max over the past several years. So I think the, I bought the very first iPhone like the week it came out and I think it
was $400 in those dollars, 2007. But still, man, they've gotten excited. $2,000 phone. Yeah. The advantage of folding it would be it's smaller? Oh, no, you can fold it out and it has a super big screen. That and it's smaller. Oh, yeah, you fold it in your pocket when it's an iPad, you can fit in your pocket or women can fit in their clutches. I heard them. This is a cute little blonde chick on Fox and friends. Ainsley? I heard Ainsley say and I can fit it in my little purse. Yeah. It's lovely. Is that appealing to you, Katie? Very important. This brick fits in nothing right now. Yeah. Yeah. You see women walking around with their tight jeans with their little pockets and their big phone just sticking out just about to fall out and smash all the side of the lock. Or we have these dumb wristlet things wrapped around so we just carry them this way right now because they don't fit in pockets. I'm surprised it hasn't caught on the neckline that I see some people wear just since everyone's
carrying a phone. I'm surprised that just hasn't become a part of life. Nerd. Why don't you tuck it into your brazier like I see an old westerns. You know, you tuck the little thing down there. Nerd. I heard our conversation about man bags which have become popular and that kind of slung over your shoulder, one shoulder. And I see lots of cool hipster sort of dudes using them or whatever, but my son when we are in New Orleans, I told this story at the time. He saw one kind of like it. I said, yeah, I see lots of them in their magazines and cool guys wear them and Tom Brady has one blah, blah, blah. He got one really liked it, everything like that. And in our we're in New Orleans, they're having a college football game that day, bunch of drunk college guys around Henry gets on the elevator sometime, some college kids is nice person. And that was the end of that. He's never used it since. It's an honorary man bun, please.
I was at that wedding over the weekend with a bunch of friends and one of our friends was carrying a man bag and there are a couple of rye comments made about it. And then as he wandered away, we were all like, what's he gotten there anyway? The hell you need that for? You got pockets. Miss tampons. Oh boy, that's just, huh? Made Katie well. Yeah, that's because that's all we carry in our purses and the top of the amounts of tampons. Right cases. Yes. What's your hat say we talked about this earlier? Very funny. Your hat is hold my drink. I got to pet this dog. Yeah, which is very, very funny. And it reminded me I had screen captured a t-shirt that I liked from a guy that said undiagnosed, but something ain't right. Childs, I thought it was funny. I thought Joe Scarborough said something really ridiculous this morning. As he was talking about the big tennis match last night, you know what I'm talking about if you watch it is one of the great tennis matches of all time. Just ridiculous about immigration.
And a bunch of other stuff that we'll get into, including that AI expert who said we're all going to die and they know it and then throp it. And why aren't we talking about this more? If you miss a segment, get the podcast. Armstrong and Getty on demand.
More episodes
More from Armstrong & Getty On Demand

The Best Weekend Talk Show In America Hour One
Armstrong & Getty On Demand

The Best Weekend Talk Show In America Hour Two
Armstrong & Getty On Demand

That Was A Quick Hanging
Armstrong & Getty On Demand

The Great Hope Of Civilization
Armstrong & Getty On Demand