Skip to content
TrackPodcasts
newsSep 3, 20261:06:28

Mega Edition: Jeffrey Epstein And The Two Men He Relied On Most (9/3/26)

About this episode

Darren Indyke and Richard Kahn were, in practical terms, Jeffrey Epstein’s go-to pair whenever something needed to be handled in the worlds of law, money, corporations, trusts, property or estate planning. Indyke was the longtime lawyer who helped structure Epstein’s legal affairs, form and manage entities, deal with contracts and trusts, and navigate the legal architecture around his wealth. Kahn was the financial operator, the accountant and money manager who tracked spending, handled payments, worked with banks and helped administer the financial side of Epstein’s sprawling network. Between them, they covered the two systems Epstein relied on most to keep his world functioning: Indyke handled the legal framework, Kahn handled the financial plumbing. When something needed to be documented, transferred, paid, incorporated, protected or organized, one or both of them were often in the picture.

That is why their roles have drawn so much scrutiny. Epstein’s operation did not run on charisma and access alone; it depended on companies, bank accounts, trusts, property structures, legal instruments and people who knew how to make all of those pieces move. Indyke and Kahn were central to that machinery for years and later became co-executors of Epstein’s estate, giving them extraordinary visibility into the same system they had helped maintain while he was alive. Both men have denied knowingly facilitating Epstein’s crimes and neither has been criminally convicted for participating in his trafficking operation, but their importance to the infrastructure is undeniable. They were effectively Epstein’s legal-and-accounting tandem: the pair who could turn his instructions into documents, payments, entities and transactions, and who helped keep the machine moving long after most outsiders would have had no idea how any of it was structured.






to contact me:

[email protected]




Get every episode summarized

Each time Jeffrey Epstein: The Coverup Chronicles publishes, we email you a written briefing from the transcript — the topics, who appeared, and any specific claims, with the ad reads skipped.

Email me new episodes

Free for 3 shows. No card needed.

Hosts & guests

Transcript ready

966 searchable segments. Every word is indexed and playable.

Mega Edition: Jeffrey Epstein And The Two Men He Relied On Most (9/3/26)

Jeffrey Epstein: The Coverup Chronicles

0:00
1:06:28

Full transcript

Jeffrey Epstein: The Coverup ChroniclesMega Edition: Jeffrey Epstein And The Two Men He Relied On Most (9/3/26). Machine-transcribed; use the interactive transcript above to jump the player to any line.

Today's article from the Daily Beast is an overview of who the two men are, what they are about, and just exactly what their role was within Jeffrey Epstein's criminal enterprise. And again, I know I was gushing about the Daily Beast recently, but here they are again doing that good work. Not many people have picked up the baton and one after Indyke and Khan, but they should have. These are two men that played a very intricate part in what Jeffrey Epstein was doing for decades. And the fact that they ended up as executors of the estate is disgusting at best. These two dudes should be worried about not going to prison for the rest of their lives for being accomplices to Jeffrey Epstein and helping facilitate his crimes. But yet here they are in charge of the fortune that is supposed to be dispersed to these

same survivors who they took part in abusing the first time, maybe not the physical abuse, right? I've never heard that they were actually partaking in the sex trafficking portion, but they most assuredly facilitated this. They most assuredly helped it go on for years and years and years. And today, Kate Bricklet and the Daily Beast is letting them have it. So this is like I said, there's a pretty long article. So I won't waste any more time with my opening monologue here and we'll jump right in. This article is from the Daily Beast. The author is Kate Bricklet and the researcher on the project was William Bretterman. Headline Jeffrey Epstein's right hand mystery men, the lawyer and the accountant. One of the men was described by a source as Epstein's confidant and aide for decades. The other was his longtime accountant.

Both could soon be questioned. And we know that Indyke wiggled off the hook as far as the deposition goes that he was supposed to give on Wednesday. Now one thing I will say for Indyke and Khan is these guys know the game as well. They're hip to the game. They understand the loopholes and they know that if they can avoid sitting down under oath and talking about what occurred while they were in Jeffrey Epstein's employ, then they have a much better chance at denial. So the idea is to never get sat down under oath and you see that from a lot of these people. They don't want to get sat down. They don't want to be in front of an investigator. They don't want to have their name on one of those sheets. They don't want to deal with that because now anything you say about this case or have said about this case, you could get yourself caught in a nice perjury trap and Indyke and Khan understand that probably better than anybody else.

The day after Jeffrey Epstein killed himself, allegedly, a man wearing a hoodie and L.A. Dodger's cap emerged from the dead sex offenders Manhattan mansion. His hat and shades obscured his face as he hauled a hefty blue gift bag out of the massive townhouse where Epstein abused scores of underage girls for years. I mean right away you're left questioning what is this guy doing at Jeffrey Epstein's house the day after, right? And then he walks out with a blue gift bag. What was in that gift bag? What was so important that he had to go to Jeffrey Epstein's house the day after he died and get that bag? Why would Richard Khan need to do that, the accountant? A photographer captured the scene that day in August 2019 and the pictures were published by the Daily Mail, which identified the mystery man as Epstein's longtime accountant and

co-executor of his $634 million estate, 47-year-old Richard Khan. The bag he was carrying, a source with close ties to Khan said, contained Epstein's funeral clothes. What? So his accountant goes to get the funeral clothes? That's a little odd, right? Why wouldn't his brother go get the funeral clothes or one of the assistants, the accountant goes, huh? I'm sure that's all that was in that bag with funeral clothes. Look, I don't know for sure what was in that bag, right? I wasn't there. I didn't take a look at the bag myself. But chances are that that bag contained a lot more than funeral clothes, folks. All right, I'm not stupid. I'm not naive. I might be a moron at times. But come on. Why would the accountant go to get his funeral clothes? Little is known about Khan outside his work for Epstein or about his co-executor 55-year-old

Darren Indyke, who served as Epstein's personal attorney for more than two decades and was apparently so close to Epstein that the money manager paid for fertility treatments for Indyke and his wife. Neither man has a public social media account and both shun press interviews. And you see that a lot with these kinds of people, right? They don't have a social media imprint or footprint, I should say. And anytime people don't have a social media footprint, it rings alarm bells in my head. Most people have social media of some kind, the Twitter, Facebook, Instagram, something, even old people. All right? These people like this, they don't have this sort of thing because they don't want to be tracked down. They don't want to answer questions and they don't want a trail of information leading back to them. So they go the route of no social footprint, but it automatically rings alarm bells in my

head. Lost it and have an internet, an internet footprint. Steven Patik, the guy that opened fire in Las Vegas on October 1st. Those are the kind of people that really terrify me these days. But both could soon be questioned as part of a lawsuit filed by Jane Doe, who alleges she was 14 when Epstein and his former girlfriend, co-conspirator, fellow child abuser, general all around scumbag, British socialite, Gilein Maxwell, began to groom and sexually abuse her in 1994. Doe is suing Indyke and Khan in their capacity as co-executors and Maxwell individually. And I think we're going to see a lot more of this, right? I think we're going to see Darren Conn, I mean, Darren Indyke and Richard Conn's names brought up more in these lawsuits because it's very apparent that they played a critical and crucial role in facilitating Jeffrey Epstein's crimes for all of these years.

And the survivors have talked about it, people in the know have talked about it, the only people who are late to the party once again is the legacy media. So again, a tip of the hat to the daily beast and especially Kate, they take on these stories that are, you know, pretty controversial, right? Coming out and talking about Alexander Dorasi, that's a big step. You would never see the New York Times doing that or the post, even though it's all factual, it's all real, it's all the truth. They don't want to give ammunition to the so-called quote-unquote other side. And that's how you know who you're dealing with. If somebody is afraid to tell the truth to you because it might affect a politician, then that person is not somebody you should trust. I'm at the point in my life right now where anything any politician says, I have to check at least three times to make sure it's the truth because all they do is lie to us at this

point. So if anyone's rallying around one side or the other, acting like that side is cares about the people or that they're going to do the best job possible for the citizens, you're not really paying attention and you're being gaslit. Maxwell, who is in federal prison in Brooklyn awaiting trial for her alleged role in Epstein's teen sex ring, could also sit for a deposition in DOES lawsuit. Oh boy, to be a roach in the rushes, huh? Imagine being a fly on the wall. Imagine being in that room and hearing the deposition from Maxwell, I'll tell you. And I think that she should have to sit for the deposition, right? She should have to do whatever it takes to make sure that justice is served. Her days of doing what she wants, Gilaen Maxwell's days of doing what she wants are over. She is now a ward of the state and she will do as directed. Last week, those attorney wrote the federal judge overseeing the case and indicated Indyke

would be deposed in both his personal capacity and as a co-executor of the Epstein estate and would offer extremely relevant testimony relating to her claims. For sure. Look, Darren Indyke had a deep knowledge of what was going on with Jeffrey Epstein. Now again, I'm not going to sit here and say to you, Darren Indyke was involved in abusing anybody. I don't know that right? And nobody has come forward saying that. But what I will say is this, you can't facilitate crimes like this for people. What because you're the money man in the mafia. You don't go to prison. That because you're the guy that handles the in house law duties for the cartel. You don't go to prison. The hell you don't. And Darren Indyke is one of these guys in my opinion that was a lot more than just an in house lawyer. Indeed, we have reason to believe he has firsthand knowledge of Jeffrey Epstein's relationship

with plaintiff while she was a minor and even acted on Jeffrey Epstein's behalf to communicate with plaintiff on several occasions. The lawyer Robert Glassman wrote to US District Judge Deborah Freeman responding to the estate's push to delay the under oath grilling. And this is a big deal, right? He's saying that Indyke had first hand knowledge of the abuse and did nothing with it. He's saying that Indyke knew this little girl was being abused by Jeffrey Epstein and just continued on with his regular life like nothing was wrong. And as far as Judge Deborah Freeman, I am not a fan. I do not trust her as far as we can throw her and I really don't trust her motivations at this point. Though also plans to depose Khan, in an email threat attached to his letter, Glassman

told the lawyer for Epstein's estate, with respect to Mr. Khan testifying in his personal capacity, we would like to know to what extent he knew about Mr. Epstein and Miss Maxwell's criminal enterprise. We would like to know if Mr. Epstein had ever told him that he sexually abused and raped my client and other minor victims. And again, very important, right? The verbiage matters here, the words matter here, and the fact that the lawyers are calling at a criminal enterprise as well is a big deal. Everybody knows that this is a criminal effing conspiracy, okay? Everybody understands that there were plenty of moving parts here. And anybody who's been paying attention also understands that this should be a rico case yesterday. How are you going to slap our Kelly with a rico case, but not these people? It defies logic. And in fact, we're going to read a couple of articles about the R Kelly case at some point

to give you a bit of an idea of how the Rico law has been used in his case, but for some reason is being ignored here, at least as of now. I trust you would agree that even if Mr. Khan started working for Mr. Epstein after Mr. Epstein stopped abusing my client, that doesn't mean Mr. Khan wouldn't or doesn't know anything about it, right? Glassman added, and that's, that's right. He could have heard something about it. They could have talked about it. Look, that's why we have depositions. That's why we have this ability in the country to bring people in and get to the bottom of things. The estate asked that the judge postponed Khan and Indyke's depositions not only because they've yet to provide discovery materials requested by Doe, but also because Maxwell is requesting a stay in the case pending her criminal trial. And remember, again, I have to point it out, when Maxwell made her statements in the sun about Epstein paying for her defense, etc, etc, the stuff about the hacked emails,

the stuff about the estate, it was all calculated. And they were all warning shots to Indyke and Khan. So I highly doubt that Indyke and Khan's legal team is not working behind the scenes with Maxwell's legal team to try and get the breaks put on all of this. Again, I don't have direct evidence of that. Nobody's talked about it in the media. Nobody said that to me, but it would make sense. Last week, the judge put the depositions on hold until the court resolves Maxwell's request and directed Doe's legal team to find a new deposition date for Indyke in September should Maxwell's motion be denied. I think it's very crucial that Indyke sits down for this deposition in September. He's run long enough, he's been able to avoid this long enough, and it's time that he sits down and answer some hard questions about his relationship with his boss and friend, Jeffrey Epstein.

No isn't the only survivor who tried to get sworn testimony from Indyke. Survivors and other lawsuits, including a case brought by Annie Farmer, were scheduled to depose him, but their participation in a victim's compensation fund put their cases on hold. And again, this is playing right into Indyke's hands, right? Indyke does not want to sit down for a deposition. That's why I'm so happy that Glassman is going so hard after the deposition, because we need to get this guy on wax, right? Let's get him down on the record, let's hear what he has to say, and then let the investigators do their work. One of the ironies is that as an Epstein executor, by agreeing to set up this claims process, he may succeed in insulating himself from discovery. An source familiar with the survivor's litigation told the Daily Beast, the source said Indyke was plucked out of obscurity by Epstein and described him as an in-house counsel to Epstein's

enterprise. 100%, how long have I been telling you guys that? Right? Look, all you have to do is pay a little bit of attention to what's going on. What are we? 640 articles deep at this point? We have covered just about everything there is to cover when it comes to this case. And Darren Indyke was built by Jeffrey Epstein. He's been working for Jeffrey Epstein since forever, and he was Jeffrey Epstein's in-house counsel. He was there, so Jeffrey Epstein can run all of the legal problems off of him. Any questions? Any, how do we find this loophole? How do we navigate that loophole? And then if shit got too serious, then of course he bring in the big gun trial attorneys like Dershowitz, etc. What are your day-to-day duties, your day-to-day mundane business activities? Well those are handled by your in-house counsel, and Darren Indyke was that in-house counsel for decades.

He was involved in virtually all of the legal work Epstein had, the source added. He's probably the person with the most knowledge about Epstein's money, business relationships, assets, and legal affairs. Again, all this stuff we've talked about, this guy has his finger on the pulse when it comes to the financials. His name is littered on receipts for shell companies, transactions, you name it. How is he not a target? He's a mystery in part because he's been with Epstein for so long, the source said. He's been Epstein's confidant and aid for decades. If he had a life outside of Epstein, it was a very private life. There's another sick of fat, right? Another guy who bought into the Epstein narrative, hook, line, and sinker. Epstein was like a demigod to Indyke, I bet. Pulled Indyke from obscurity, gave him this fancy job as his in-house counsel, access to a bunch of young models if he wanted.

Boy, the world was great for Indyke, wasn't it? Meanwhile, he was helping facilitate this monster's horrible decades-long run of crimes. And yet somehow he doesn't even get a deposition? Indyke was his criminal defense lawyer. Indyke and his criminal defense lawyer. Mark Agnafilo, hired amid the government's ongoing probe of Epstein and his companies, did not return messages left by the Daily Beast. His relatives also declined to comment. The father of two worked at Epstein's personal attorney since the 1990s, serving as an officer for the financier, pedophiles, charities, handling feuds with unpaid contractors, and representing the businesses of women in Epstein's circle. In 2012, he signed corporation paperwork for the design business of Sarah Kellin and alleged co-conspirator of Epstein, whom Palm Beach cops were ready to charge in their

2006 probe. Kellin was named the Complace in Epstein's 2008 plea deal, which shielded her from prosecution. So again, look, it wasn't like Indyke is some, you know, just guy that got happened to get caught up in this. He was around after Epstein was convicted before Epstein was convicted and helped facilitate companies for people such as Sarah Kellin Vickers. This is a man who has all the secrets. This is a man who needs to be arrested. As the Daily Beast is previously revealed, Indyke also represented the woman's empowerment business of Lana, Pazadiva, a Russian model in Epstein's orbit. In 2018, Indyke filed trademark paperwork and registered the website for Pazadiva's business, We Talks. Ever show that weeks after Epstein's suicide, Pazadiva swapped Indyke for another lawyer.

Again, it's all about Epstein, right? Epstein facilitated all of that. Epstein set Indyke up with her obviously and once Epstein was out of the picture, well, she decided to hop on to another lawyer because her relationship with Indyke probably wasn't that tight. The tie that binded was Epstein obviously. But Indyke has his fingers in many pies and all of them smell like Jeffrey Epstein. Indyke's name is also on a corporation filing for the anonymous company that owned Maxwell's East 65th Street townhouse. In 2000, Epstein's friend, Lynn Forrester sold the residence to the LLC for $4.95 million according to reports. Now remember, Lynn Forrester is now a Rothchild. That family is another family full of snakes and serpents, huh? He served as a trustee of Maxwell's Max Foundation from 2001 to 2010 until he was replaced

by Dana Burns, a woman pictured in society photos with Epstein and who also worked for Maxwell's Ocean Nonprofit, the Terramar Project. Again, the Terramar Project was just another front company in my opinion, just another way for them to wash their money and for them to grift. It is absolutely mind-boggling that they were able to operate the way they were for so long. Indyke was not only involved with Jeffrey Epstein, convicted sex offender, but now also has his name all over Maxwell's shit as well. Accused sex offender, child abuser, but you mean to tell me Indyke is clean? Stop it. Meanwhile Indyke was listed as Secretary of the Wexner Foundation, a nonprofit founded by Epstein's only-known clients, ex-Victoria's secret mogul Leslie Wexner, and his wife Abigale,

an SEC filing from 1998 to 2001. The nonprofit's tax forms also listed Indyke as Secretary through 2006. Two years later, Abigale Wexner gave Indyke power of attorney over her condominium at 15 Central Park West property records show. So not only was Jeffrey Epstein, dicking around with Wexner's money, well they thought it would be a good idea to have Indyke involved as well. Now remember, we're talking about Leslie Wexner, head of Elbrans, my strove of Victoria's secret. What is he and his wife need, Darren Indyke, to have power of attorney over their condominium for? Why do they need Darren Indyke as the Secretary of the Wexner Foundation? And anybody explain that to me. What has Indyke done in his life, or up to that point in his life, to garner such a high

place at the table? Friends from high school and throughout Indyke's life were surprised to see his name connected to Epstein in the press after the hedge funder died. Indyke grew up in a middle-class family in Glencove, a small city on the north shore of Long Island. Old Hood pals told the Daily Beast he was a sweet, normal guy who was actively involved with theater from a young age through high school. Yes, so okay, great. In high school he was a normal cat, no doubt about it. Great, perfect. What happens? Money, folks. How many times do we talk about it? Greed. Greed, greed, greed. In his 1982 senior year book Indyke wrote that in 20 years he would be performing his first case for the Supreme Court quoting Al Pacino, Yahoo Finance reported. Little did he know that what he really meant was in 2022 he'd be in court defending himself. He graduated from Colgate College in 1986 and Cornell Law School five years later.

One former friend who grew up on his block said, even when he was in high school, he knew he was going to law school. He was driven. Everything he did was towards becoming an attorney. It was something his parents wanted, the friend added. When the acquaintance got in trouble for selling ice cream at Jones Beach in the early 80s, he panicked and told an officer his name was something like Darryl Indyke and gave an address that was slightly off. Somehow the pal told the Daily Beast officials discovered the correct spelling and address for Indyke and appeared at his doorstep over the illegal vending. His father Bernie was furious, the friend said, adding that he marched over to my house and confronted my father. I got into all kinds of trouble. The point was that Indyke needed an unblemished record because he wanted to go to law school and something like this could have hurt him in some ways. Chances going to a top law school. All right, so I don't know about you folks, but I can't even imagine living a childhood

where the most trouble you're going to get is for selling illegal ice cream at the beach. I grew up in the inner city and let me tell you what, there was a lot more going on where I grew up than selling illegal ice cream. And that's why I say these people weren't built for this shit. Even someone like this Indyke, what you think? He gets under the thumb of an investigator. He gets under the thumb of an interrogator. He's going to be quiet. He's going to shut down and not rat anybody out. Please. Please. I think I apologized to him, for sure the friend said, but it was really his father who was most upset. After law school, Indyke did a four-year stint with Golden Wachtel, a now-defunct Boteague law firm, and represented several clients in copyright lawsuits. Golden Wachtel represented Epstein at least as far back as 1988. Firm principal William Wachtel declined to discuss that, but said he hired Indyke as a

favorite of the younger man's father, Bernard Indyke, whom he described as a mailroom employee at a financial company that had retained gold and a Wachtel. So a mailroom employee has enough pull to get this lawyer, William Wachtel, to hire his son. Must be one hell of a mail-sorter, folks. Again, there's more that's going on here. That needs a deeper look. All of these ties most certainly need a deeper look. Court records indicate Indyke's father was in fact a manager and member of the board at Jackie Fine Arts, a golden Wachtel client that sold low-value art reproduction rights to the rich at high prices as a calculated tax dodge. Well, there you go. Of course it was a little bit more than that. He wasn't just a member of the mailroom. He was a manager and a member of the board at Jackie Fine Arts. So of course it looked a little funny that last paragraph, right?

Why would this big time lawyer show up in a mailroom and give somebody son a job? That does not make sense. This on the other hand makes a lot more sense. Jackie Fine Arts, another calculated tax dodge, another way for them to launder money, that strikes closer to home for me. Efforts to reach the founder of the company, Hermann Feinsad once held as the King of Tax Shelters were unsuccessful. Look, a lot of this that we talk about here, folks, is based on the financials. These guys are up to their ears in financial irregularities and financial crimes. This is apparent. You find someone successful and hit your wagon to them, a child, a friend of Indykes, who last saw him when they were in their 20s, told the Daily Beast. People fall into these situations and they can't extricate themselves.

That's the benefit of the doubt I would give him. No, sorry, no benefit of the doubt from somebody who hasn't seen him since they were in their 20s. I'm sorry, I can't give him that benefit of the doubt. He didn't fall into this. If anything, it was his greed that got him caught up in this. And again, that is his fault. Indykes felt indebted to Epstein for his large s. As Indyke wrote in a glowing biography of his boss, prepared for Florida prosecutors, Epstein paid for prohibitively expensive in vitro fertilization cycles for him and his wife. Okay, so on the face of that, that's cool, right? I know if I had a bunch of money and I had a friend who was having problems getting his wife pregnant and they needed some in vitro fertilization cycles, I would be more than happy to help them out. Zero doubt about it. Whatever my friends needed, I would be there if I had this kind of money. No strings attached.

But do you think that Jeffrey Epstein ever did anything without strings attached? Of course he didn't. But this wasn't a situation where Indyke was indebted to him because of that. Indyke worked hand in hand knowingly with Jeffrey Epstein as Jeffrey Epstein went on a decades long run of a sex trafficking operation. That is who Indyke is. Shortly after I began working for Jeffrey, I experienced a personal and unexpected tragedy. After five years of marriage, my wife and I learned that I was in fertile and we could not have children in the traditional manner. Indyke wrote in his bio, first reported by the Palm Beach Post. I meekly approached Jeffrey and asked him if it would be possible to drop my wife and me from the company's medical policy in exchange for a different one, in exchange for a different one, or cash payment. Indyke continued, puzzled by my request, Jeffrey naturally asked why.

When I told him, he was visibly affected and without even a moment's consideration, he told me to go for treatment and send him the bills. Having been with Jeffrey only a few months, I was astounded by his generosity and hurried to my desk to call my wife to share the amazing news. Of course, that's what Jeffrey Epstein would do for these people, right? That was all part of their package, that was part of your silence. Indyke claimed Epstein paid for five cycles of in vitro and that Maxwell even offered to look into adoption for his family. Aw, isn't that cute. I guess that settles it too. I mean, Epstein offered to pay for the in vitro and Maxwell offered to look for adoption, so they're obviously good people and we should just forget everything else they have done. At the unsuccessful completion of our fourth cycle and a failed adoption attempt, my wife and I were at the end of our rope and did not want to continue Indyke declared. Without Jeffrey's support and stubborn daily encouragement, we would not have.

He even recruited his then girlfriend, Gilaean Maxwell, to meet with us to offer assistance with local adoption and oversee adoption procedures and to encourage us to try again. That shit's terrifying on his face. All right, all right. Most people read that and they think, oh, yeah, it's about adoption. I read that and say it to myself, how does Gilaean Maxwell know all the ins and outs of this sort of shit? How many kids were adopted by Gilaean or with Gilaean's help for other people? Can we look into that? Is anybody digging into that? I think that's a story that might have legs there for all you investigative journalists out there. The fact that she knows all the ins and outs of this adoption is terrifying to me, folks, okay? This is not a lady that should be adopting kids or advising anybody on the steps that need to be taken to do so. Thankfully, after our fifth cycle, my wife and I were blessed with twin daughters. Although Jeffrey was adamant that we owed him nothing, Jeffrey honored us by agreeing

to be the godfather of our children. How many times was Jeffrey Epstein is the godfather of a lot of children, isn't he? Now I could understand if his name was Gotti, all right, or Kassow, or, you know, Gambino, but this guy shares a godfather to a lot of children, which on its face is absolutely disgusting, by the way. In the past decade, Indyke and his wife have owned two different properties in Boca Raton, Florida, one of which they still own, having acquired it for $3.1 million without a mortgage in 2015. Another bought in 2014 and sold four years after sat in the exclusive enclave of Boca Grove plantation. It required the paratashel out at least $70,000 beyond the $460,000 purchase price for a social equity membership in the Boca Grove Golf and Tennis Club.

Oh, I'm sure that was fun. Stan, do you have my chin crumpets? We're going to the Boca Raton Grove Golf and Tennis Club to make Buffy and Biff. Give me an absolute break, $70,000 to go noodle around with a bunch of moronic, archaic, ass, so-called elite society members. No thanks. I'll take that $70,000 and go on a fantastic vacation. All the while they maintained a residence in Livingston, New Jersey, which they purchased through an LLC for $1.75 million in 2003. In his recent book, Relentless Pursuit, longtime survivor's lawyer Brad Edwards described Indyke as Epstein's fixer who had attended important hearings as well as my depositions of Epstein over the years. Yeah, hell yeah, of course he did because he was Epstein's numeral UNO. Number one, top hitter, big dog, on the lawyer, on the house representative, it all comes

through me. That was Indyke's role. That's what he did. He acted as Jeffrey Epstein's Tom Hagen folks. When Edwards sat for a 2017 deposition with his years long court battle with Epstein, Indyke was there to take notes. Darren Indyke, who was a staple at every Epstein event, was situated in his normal spot at the far end of the table in order to monitor and report back to Epstein. Everything that happened, Edwards wrote, he wasn't a litigator, he was more like a fixer. Edwards noted at another point, Indyke had one client, Jeffrey Epstein. I mean, is the Tom Hagen comparison perfect or what folks now, obviously Indyke is nowhere near as cool as Tom Hagen was, right? Tom Hagen was the man, but I'm talking about their function, right? Edwards represents a client referred to as Caitlin Doe, who alleges in a lawsuit that

Epstein forced her to marry one of his non-citizen female recruiters, Nupshul's arrange, she says, through Epstein's long time New York attorney. That would be Darren Indyke, all right? So now Darren Indyke has his name all over Lorde Knows, what documents, but he also facilitated the marriage of a girl who was a non-citizen, probably trafficked to one of his female recruiters. They organized that marriage of a probably sex trafficked girl with Indyke acting as the facilitator. How is he not arrested? How is he not indicted? The ceremony included not only signing the necessary legal paperwork prepared by the attorney, but also opposing for photographs to give the appearance that the marriage was legitimate to complaint states. Whether Indyke was this attorney hasn't been publicly confirmed, Edwards cannot be reached for comment. It's obviously Indyke.

I mean, look, I don't, again, I don't have that for sure 100%. But we're talking about Epstein's in-house lawyer, the man that Epstein trusts the most, and it's rather obvious that it was Indyke who was the one involved here. He's known as a lesser-known figure in Epstein's world, and his name is hardly mentioned in litigation related to the sex offender's survivors. There was no public images of the accountant until the Daily Mail's photo of him transporting the gift bag in August 2019, along with snapshots of him leaving Epstein's home in February 2019 following a two-hour visit, who an international man of mystery. No public photos of this guy? I mean, really? Days after the mail published the images, an attorney for one survivor wrote to Khan's lawyers demanding materials to be preserved. Is it true that Mr. Khan entered Mr. Epstein's townhouse and removed documents lawyers wrote

before requesting a list of documents and or materials? Mr. Khan removed from Mr. Epstein's townhouse that day, and on any other occasion after Mr. Epstein's death? Well, that's a pretty fair request, right? What are you doing in his house? Why is anybody in this man's house? Why doesn't have some of that yellow ribbon over it, calling it a crime scene? Shouldn't it be a crime scene? I mean, shouldn't you preserve a crime scene? Isn't that how this all works? Council for the Epstein Estate dismissed the mail report and told the survivor's team via email, our clients take their preservation obligation seriously. They do, huh? They do? They haven't taken anything seriously in this whole case, but now they take the preservation part seriously? Okay. A person with knowledge told the Daily Beast that the bag contained funeral attire, and that Khan was doing his obligation as an executor, which is to attend the burial details.

Yeah, that's fine. Attempted the burial details, but let's get real, okay? Somebody like Khan isn't going to get an outfit for Jeffrey Epstein's funeral. They have assistance. They have underlings. They have coffee getters. So don't tell me he showed up there to get an outfit. Ridiculous. The source said Khan is never socialized with Epstein and wasn't aware of Epstein's alleged abuse. And first met Epstein when he began working for him in 2005. Out of a Madison Avenue office, he shared with Indyke, an accountant named Bella Klein and Epstein's personal assistant and alleged co-conspirator Leslie Groff also routinely worked in the New York office. That's nice, huh? What a, uh, what a group of scoundrels. Richard worked out of the office, the source added. Did Epstein appear at those offices? Yes. Richard, see any of the activities that were focused on the focus of press attention?

No. Khan's name appears throughout records for Epstein's non-profits and corporations and was mentioned in the 2010 deposition of Epstein's Palm Beach House manager, Janus Benassiac, who described him as a senior accountant. Would you say that Mr. Khan is a key employee, like a right-hand man of Mr. Epstein? Khan's survivors lawyer asked Benassiac replied in the affirmative. Khan is listed as treasurer for Epstein's financial strategy, strategy group LTD, FSG, which filed an application in 2013 to become an international banking entity based in the US Virgin Islands. Indyke was secretary and Epstein president record show. Okay, so here you go again. His name is on one of these front companies that was involved at the very least in fraud and money laundering so that itself should earn him an indictment.

FSG, which changed its name to Southern Country International, was approved in 2014 to run a bank specializing only in offshore clients. In 2018, Erica Kellerholtz, Epstein's tax lawyer based in St. Thomas told Territory officials the bank's operations hadn't yet begun. According to the New York Times, whether the bank actively pursued customers is unclear. But months after Epstein died, the estate transferred more than $12 million to Southern Country's coffers. The bank's year-end value was $499,759, two weeks after the transfer, the times reported, and what happened to the money isn't clear. And there is the big rub, right? Where is this money? Where did it go? Who's involved with it? Who was in charge of it? Who facilitated the transaction? We don't know any of this, but you can rest assured that the prosecutors most certainly

do. According to FSG's articles of incorporation, Khan became a certified public accountant in 1995. He graduated from Syracuse University in 1994 and got a Master's in Taxation from Pace University in 1999. Oh, so we got a Master's in theft? That's cool, because we all know, taxation is theft. Conan's wife, Lisa, purchased a $2.8 million co-op apartment on the Upper East Side in 2008 property record show. And they took out a mortgage on the residence in 2016. The couple also owns a six-bedroom, Hampton's mansion purchased for $1.5 million in 2015. Boy, it sure does pay to work for Jeffrey Epstein, doesn't it? While all of these people were amassing their fortunes while they were having their houses in the Hamptons right next to Ramona Singers, the survivors were struggling for air. The survivors were battling to be heard.

And the survivors were still being abused by the system and people like Indyke and Khan. How is that even possibly acceptable? Khan who declined to comment for this article has been an executive with Epstein shadowy non-profits since at least 2007. That year, Khan replaced Maxwell as treasurer of the COUQ Foundation and held the role until the charity dissolved five years later. And that folks also was a calculated move in my opinion. They knew that they were going to be facing the legal portion of Jeffrey Epstein's actions and they wanted to try and shade Maxwell from the fallout. So they moved Khan in there as a preemptive move because Khan is an accountant anyway. So they could just use that as their cover and give Maxwell a little bit of shadowy protection

in the process. COUQ contributed 46 million in stock and other assets to Wexner's YLK, YLK Charitable Fund in 2008. Just before Epstein started his Palm Beach jail sentence, according to one CNBC report, Epstein's nonprofit gave 14 million to YLK in 2007. Before COUQ shut down in November 2012, Epstein created another murky entity called Gratitude America LTD, all of these places folks were laundering money and sheltering laundered money. That's what all of these front companies' purposes were. The charity's tax filings didn't show revenues until 2015, when Khan replaced Epstein as president of the group and investor Leon Black donated 10 million through an anonymous LLC. The attorney general of the US Virgin Islands recently issued civil subpoenas to Black over his

relationship to Epstein. And we've been discussing that at length, right? Leon Black has a lot to answer for here. Dushbank, oh excuse me, I mean Deutsche Bank, AG, where Gratitude America had an account is also under fire over its relationship with Epstein. In July, the bank was fined $150 million for felling to detect millions in suspicious transactions, including payments to Epstein's alleged co-conspirators and more than $800,000 in withdrawals made by Epstein's personal attorney. So that alone right there shows you just a little look at the financial scruery that was occurring on a daily basis within Jeffrey Epstein's criminal enterprise. Prior to Indyke, Khan made political donations to the same candidate Epstein back throughout the years.

In 2007, Khan and his wife each made $2,300 donations to the presidential campaign of former New Mexico governor Bill Richardson, a friend of Epstein. Indyke and his wife, Michelle Safer, also donated $2,300 a piece to Richardson that year. One of Epstein's survivors, Virginia Roberts, claims Maxwell directed her to have sex with Richardson. He has denied involvement with Epstein's trafficking scheme and it just goes to show you folks follow the money, right? That's what everyone wants to say. But I warn you, if you're biased in this case and you're worried about upsetting the Apple card and the other side getting ammunition, you might not want to look into it. You might want to stay in your own little echo chamber because when you take a look at who was donating money, in Jeffrey Epstein's name basically and who they were donating it to, your jaw will hit the floor.

Khan donated a total of $5,400 to the campaign of Congresswoman Stacy Plasket of the US Virgin Islands in 2016 and 2700 in 2018. She shelled out 2,600 to Plasket in 2014 as did fellow Epstein accountant Bella Klein. After Epstein's July 2019 arrest, Plasket said she'd returned Epstein's money, though it is unknown whether she planned to return the funds of his associates. And I think that's a good angle that Kate is working here, right? Kate is doing a good job here. It's important to follow this money. It's important to see not only who Epstein donated to, but his confidence. In the itemized receipts for the 2016 and 2018 donations, Khan's occupation is listed as attorney. He's never been registered, however, as a lawyer in the New York state. Boy folks, that was a pretty good encompassing look at Indyke and Khan and their role within

Jeffrey Epstein's criminal enterprise. And the question remains, why are these two men co-executors of the estate rather than guests of the state? If you'd like to contact me, you can do that at Bobbi Kapuchi at protonmail.com. That's B-O-B-B-Y-C-A-P-U-C-C-I at protonmail.com. You can also find me on Twitter at B-O-B-B-Y underscore C-A-P-U-C-C-I. All of the links that go with this episode can be found in the description box. Alright, everyone, and welcome to another episode of the Epstein Chronicles. The congressional investigation into Jeffrey Epstein continued yesterday, as the committee deposed Daren Indyke, Jeffrey Epstein's longtime lawyer. And of course, Daren Indyke said he had no idea about Jeffrey Epstein's crimes, and

that he never saw anything that would even come close to what Jeffrey Epstein was accused of. Oh, and those withdrawals that he made when he was structuring and avoiding Title 31? Well, that's because he had trouble getting a credit card. Meanwhile, the withdrawals were coming from Epstein's account. And if Indyke was having trouble getting a credit card, he could have easily just got one of Epstein's. He was conducting Epstein's business, not his own, and I don't need the transcript to tell you that if that's what he said, he perjured himself, and considering who we're talking about here, my guess is, it wasn't the only time that he was playing loose with the truth. If Daren Indyke tells the truth, he is going to implicate himself. And obviously, that's the last thing he wants to do. So let's dive into this article from CNN, and let's see what they have to say about the deposition of Daren Indyke. Headline, longtime Epstein attorney says he didn't know of the financiers' sexual abuse.

This article was authored by M. Steck and Annie Greyer. Jeffrey Epstein's longtime employee and attorney Daren Indyke testified to lawmakers on Thursday that he had no knowledge whatsoever of the convicted sex offenders wrongdoing and rejected any suggestion. He assisted or facilitated his former boss' crimes according to a copy of his opening statement. Well, that settles it. Daren Indyke told you he had nothing to do with it, so we should just move on, right? Find somebody else to talk to. It's not me, babe. It's not me. Had I known that he was abusing or trafficking women, I would have quit working for him at once and severed all ties to him. Indyke said in an opening statement to the House Oversight Committee, a copy of which CNN obtained. The truth is that I did not know what Mr. Epstein did after hours, behind closed doors, and in places where I was not present.

You sure signed a lot of paperwork, though, didn't you? How many lawsuits did you settle? How much hush money did you pay? How many sham marriages did you set up? How much immigration fraud was involved? And if Daren Indyke says none, then I'm going to say, in my opinion, he's lying. And I don't just pull that out of my hat. I think we have reams of evidence. That point to Daren Indyke being a major cog in the Epstein machine. And if Epstein would have been charged with Rico, like he should have been, Indyke would have been charged as well. Like one of Epstein's longest serving employees, worked as an attorney forum for more than 20 years, on corporate, transactional, and general legal services. He described his work as a consulting role for an entirely legitimate purpose. The closed door deposition lasted for roughly eight hours. An entirely legitimate purpose, huh?

I'm pretty sure that all the people that were wronged wouldn't feel the same way. Whether it's financially, whether it's physically, or anything in between, I highly doubt legitimate is involved. Democrats said they believe that Indyke is not credible for saying he had no knowledge of Epstein's crimes and said Indyke may have perjured himself in his deposition. Well I haven't seen the transcript, so I'll take the same stance I always do until we look at that. But I have no doubt that Indyke was telling stories. He has to, if not, he's going to incriminate himself, right? So Indyke is in a spot. Now do I think he's ever going to be charged with perjury or lying to Congress? Hell no. They don't have the guts. And remember this whole entire procedure is nothing more than procedure rule. If you think that James Comer and his band of merry men are going to do anything as far

as real oversight here, or really hold anyone accountable, you have not been paying attention. If it wasn't for the discharge petition, forget it. Democratic representative Dave Minne, a lawyer and former law professor, said of the deposition, it's just not credible to claim that you had no knowledge of what was happening. I'm very surprised that he did not take the Fifth Amendment. I think it's very likely that he perjured himself over and over and over again. The congressman said, and look, I wasn't in the room, right? So I'm not going to sit here and tell you that Dave Minne's telling the truth. I don't know. But one thing I definitely do know after all these years is that Darren Indyke is not exactly what I would call a truthful person. So if Dave Minne is saying that he perjured himself, he probably did. And if I was a betting man and you were laying odds, I would take the bet that he perjured himself.

Democratic representative Jasmine Crockett said, I can tell you that he has been quite defensive of Jeffrey Epstein, almost as if he still doesn't believe Jeffrey Epstein to be who Jeffrey Epstein was. Well, that's because fellow travelers and all right. A lot of these people that come out and say, oh, well, I'm abhorred by what Jeffrey Epstein was up to. We're actually in on it. They were there. They were around. They knew they heard. They didn't care. Why should they? Some vulnerable girl from West Palm Beach. What does that matter to them? Hey, Jeffrey, you got that 500,000 for me? That's what matters. Not poor people. Not vulnerable girls. Not you or me. More money, more power, more, more, more, more, more, more, more, more, more, more, more, to always more. And inevitably, that more comes from you. Lawmakers are seeking answers on Indykes' work and his knowledge of Epstein's financial

dealings. The testimony occurred behind closed doors. The lawmakers are expected to release a video later. Well, I want the transcript. What's up with the videos? Let's get the transcripts. Videos are great, but the transcripts are important too. So hopefully we get the actual written portion of this, the transcript, so that we can dive into it. In his opening statement, Indykes pushed back on allegations that he withdrew thousands of dollars in cash on Epstein's behalf to avoid triggering bank suspicions. He said the cash was not used for any improper purposes. Bro, you were structuring. Stop the nonsense. We talked about this years ago. All of a sudden you weren't structuring. I mean, that might work on somebody else, but not me. I used to manage a sports book in Las Vegas. I know all about Title 31. And if any of my players were trying to do what Darenind I did, they'd be hit with the saw so quick that it would make your head spin.

Police investigators found that Epstein, often paid young girls and women between $200 and $300, that the woman said came after he abused them under the guise of performing massages in the mid-2000s. Min said he asked Indykes about a $725,000 cash withdrawal he made using a maximum of $7,500 per withdrawal to not trigger federal reporting and said that Indykes couldn't describe what that was for. While Epstein said it was for gas for the plane, remember, oh, this is for fuel. And of course, the bank was happy to help him out. But now Indykes has no idea. He has no clue what's going on. I guess it's just another case of Epstein amnesia. In his opening statement, Indykes also categorically denied that he helped cause young women into the same sex, sham marriages with each other to circumvent immigration, calling it 100%

untrue. Well, I think he's lying. And I think the evidence backs it up. And all it's going to take is one of these girls to come forward and say, yeah, this happened and Indykes cooked and I have a sneaking suspicion. That's going to happen. These allegations were made in a 2024 class-action civil lawsuit filed by Epstein victims against Indykes and his fellow co-executor of Epstein's estate, Richard Khan. The pseudo-ledged, that the two, were facilitators in Epstein's sex trafficking operation, and were also integral in allowing Epstein to escape justice for years by concealing his litany of crimes. The pair strongly denied the allegations. Excellency the estate agreed to settle the lawsuit for up to 35 million, but admitted no wrongdoing. The court pre-liminarily approved the settlement earlier this month. It's always except the suit but with no wrongdoing, right?

Hell of a system we have set up here in America, when you can buy your way out, of allegations like these. Addressing the committee, Indykes also said that after Epstein was convicted in 2008 on state charges for soliciting prostitution from a minor, his former boss appeared devastated and extremely contrite. Yeah, devastated and contrite he got caught. What do you think he had a role more for what he did? We all know the answer to that. Listen to him explain it himself. Oh, it's like stealing a bagel. What? You abused literally thousands of people you sicked a generate fuck. What do you mean it's like stealing a bagel? He was adamant that he had no idea that anyone involved was under age and personally assured me he would never again let himself be in that position, I believe them. And I made the mistake of believing Mr. Epstein that he would not again commit a crime. I deeply regret doing so, most importantly, I feel horrible for those women who Mr.

Epstein abused, said Indykes. Does he mean the women who is abusive facilitated? Is that what he means? Because from where I'm sitting here in the peanut gallery, I think that the evidence certainly points in that direction. House oversight chair James Comer said that Republicans asked Indykes why he continued to work with Epstein after he was convicted in 2008. Well, maybe someone should ask Comer why he didn't show up to talk to Les Wexner. That might have been an important deposition, no, but they're done with Les Wexner. They have nothing left to ask him. He said that Epstein told him it was a mistake. It was a one-time deal. He didn't know the girl was under age, the one that he got convicted of in West Palm Beach, and Indykes said he convinced him that he would never do it again and said that he had remorse. So that was about it. Comer said, wow. Imagine sitting on that committee and listening to that nonsense, I would be seething.

That's also said that Indykes could not give a straight answer about whether an accuser of President Donald Trump was given a settlement, which was an issue that came up during the panel's deposition last week with Epstein's accountant Richard Khan. It's very concerning that the story around Jane Doe 4, as it relates to the executors of the estate, has now changed four or five times, whether there was ever a settlement. So until we get an answer on that question, we will not be satisfied. Like Representative Robert Garcia said, well, I can agree with that. Like we need to know the deal. Was the settlement paid out or wasn't it? It shouldn't be this big of a deal to find out. Democratic Representative Melanie Stansbury said that she believes that there are two separate women who have made allegations against Trump because in the deposition on Thursday Indykes would not confirm if the woman who filed the lawsuit and restraining order against Trump that appeared in the Epstein estate files was a separate individual from Jane Doe 4,

who appears in the Department of Justice Epstein files. I ask today if these were two different individuals and he cannot confirm. I believe that these are two different allegations involving two different minors. Stansbury said Trump has consistently denied wrongdoing in connection with Epstein. And the name appearing in the Epstein case files is not evidence of wrongdoing. Well that's true. But when you're mentioned what 38,000 times or something, people are going to have some questions. And then of course you have this war that just happens to kick off coincidentally in the middle of all of this. People are going to have some questions. And his opening statement, Indyke pointed to his work as co-executor of Epstein's estate, which is cooperated with the committee's requests for evidence and material. As if they had any choice. I mean come on. The estate also established a restitution program for Epstein victims called the Epstein

Victim Compensation Program, which dulled out 121 million to 136 women. The estate has also settled multiple civil lawsuits filed by victims and agreed to pay 48 million to an additional 59 women. And that compensation fund didn't even pay out the amount of money to all those women, 136 of them, as they did to the USVI. But go ahead and tell me how this is all a cash grab. Less than a million dollars each is what these women got when you look at the aggregate total. All of that for a lifetime of pain. Sounds like a great deal, huh? Garcia said that there are two areas of the committee's subpoena to the Epstein estate, which Indyke helps oversee, that have not been provided to the committee. The missing documents include court records, in the case between Virginia Roberts and Golan Maxwell, as well as various documents related to businesses, firms, and organizations that

had communications with Epstein. Garcia claimed that the estate has asked oversight Republicans for clarity on which documents they need, but Republicans are stalling. Of course they are. That's the whole entire trick. Comer defended the Epstein's estate compliance with his subpoena and said the reason they haven't pushed to get the remaining documents is because they overlap with other subpoenas the committee has issued and is receiving documents for. Oh, this guy is just too much. This guy is way too much to deal with. James Comer, you're going to go down as one of the biggest clowns, maybe in history. When all is said and done and this story is written, you're going to go down as a big time clown, my friend, and don't think this is over for you because that boomerang is going to come back around. At some point, my hope is that James Comer is on the other end of one of these depositions about his behavior during his investigation into Jeffrey Epstein.

Because enough is enough. And at this point, my question is, who's watching the watchers? In February, Tim, parlator, who previously worked with Indike and is a former attorney for President Donald Trump, told CNN, Randy K, that Indike worked on the legitimate side of Epstein's business. Oh, of course, of course he did another Trump friend. Are you guys catching on yet? A lawyer for Indike told CNN, in a statement at the time, not a single woman has ever accused Mr. Indike or Mr. Khan of committing sexual abuse or witnessing sexual abuse, nor claimed at any time that she reported to them any allegation of Mr. Epstein's abuse. Notice they don't talk about enabling. Notice they don't talk about being co-conspirators or committing financial crimes. Because that's what they did. Nobody ever said Indike and Khan were abusing girls or they were sitting around in the corner in the cocktail watching. Nobody ever said that.

Notice how they don't ask about any of the serious issues. They don't really dive in and dig deep. And then you have Koma coming out and defending it. The lawyer added that both men have denied they knowingly facilitated or assisted Mr. Epstein and his sexual abuse or trafficking of women or that they were aware of Mr. Epstein's actions, knowingly facilitated. I mean they might have, but they didn't know. Could have been on the slide. Oh, you know what? Maybe I did facilitate them now that I think about it. Folks, these people think you're stupid and they think this sham of a committee is going to help them help you move on. But the more they want us to move on, the more we dig in. And that's exactly what I plan on doing here on the podcast. So like usual, we'll keep an eye on things. And when we get a transcript to add to the catalog, we most certainly will do that. Until then, that's going to do it for this one. All the information that goes with this episode can be found in the description box.

More episodes

More from Jeffrey Epstein: The Coverup Chronicles

View all episodes →