Skip to content
TrackPodcasts
newsMar 1, 202615:17

JP Morgan Attempts To Get Files From The Manhattan Prosecutors Office

About this episode

JPMorgan Chase & Co. has asked the Manhattan District Attorney’s office, led by Alvin Bragg, to turn over certain records and documents as part of the federal lawsuits the bank is facing over its business relationship with Jeffrey Epstein. The requests came amid litigation by Epstein accusers and the U.S. Virgin Islands that alleges JPMorgan enabled Epstein’s sex-trafficking network by maintaining him as a client for years, including after his 2008 conviction. JPMorgan is seeking statements and other materials from Bragg’s office that could relate to claims by a woman suing the bank — identified in court filings as “Jane Doe” — about what the bank knew regarding Epstein and his activities, and whether senior executives, such as former JPMorgan banker Jes Staley, had first-hand knowledge of his operations.

A federal judge ordered the Manhattan DA’s office to provide a privilege log describing the documents JPMorgan wants and later ruled that certain statements made by a plaintiff to one of the DA’s prosecutors must be turned over to the bank. The judge’s rulings underscore how the evidence held by prosecutors in New York — including victim statements — may play a role in the civil cases against JPMorgan by shedding light on what the bank and its former executives may have known about Epstein’s criminal conduct during their interactions with him.


to contact me:

[email protected]

Get every episode summarized

Each time Jeffrey Epstein: The Coverup Chronicles publishes, we email you a written briefing from the transcript — the topics, who appeared, and any specific claims, with the ad reads skipped.

Email me new episodes

Free for 3 shows. No card needed.

Hosts & guests

Transcript ready

237 searchable segments. Every word is indexed and playable.

JP Morgan Attempts To Get Files From The Manhattan Prosecutors Office

Jeffrey Epstein: The Coverup Chronicles

0:00
15:17

Full transcript

Jeffrey Epstein: The Coverup ChroniclesJP Morgan Attempts To Get Files From The Manhattan Prosecutors Office. Machine-transcribed; use the interactive transcript above to jump the player to any line.

Tyler Reddick here from 2311 Racing. The rush of racing, nothing beats it, but Chumba Casino comes close. Chumba's got fast spins, fun games, daily bonuses, and all the action you can handle. Now that's a run. Ready to hit the throttle, get in the driver's seat, and head to chumbacasino.com. Let's Chumba. Sponsored by Chumba Casino, no purchase necessary, VGW Group Voidware prohibited by law, 21 plus turns and conditions apply. What's up everyone and welcome back to the Epstein Chronicles. So JP Morgan is seeking files from the Manhattan DA's office in its Jeffrey Epstein lawsuits. And I find that laughable considering that the New York prosecutor's office let Jeffrey Epstein off the hook every single step of the way. Just go ask Sy Vance about Jeffrey Epstein and ask them why they argue that Jeffrey Epstein shouldn't be considered the worst of the worst when it comes to sex offenders.

Because that's the argument the New York attorney's office made on behalf of Jeffrey Epstein. So other people might have forgotten, I certainly haven't. And I know that those of you out there that are following this case, you haven't forgotten either. And while I'm ranting real quick, I might as well rant about all of the snake oil salesmen that pop up on Twitter, basically on a daily basis, talking about Epstein. These people don't know the first thing about the first thing, yet they get up there and talk about how they're going to expose the whole entire enterprise. Meanwhile, those same people talking about, oh, I'm going to expose this or expose that couldn't expose themselves at a nudist festival. So save the bullshit, all right? And stop trying to draw a traffic to your stupid Twitter site, your stupid Twitter handle by posting bullshit about Jeffrey Epstein. That's not even real. And the crazy part about that is there's so much salacious stuff that you could talk about that it's insane that people make stuff up. For example, when's the last time you heard a heart hitting piece about George Mitchell

and his relationship with Jeffrey Epstein. And if you don't know who George Mitchell is, let me give you a little crash course real quick. George John Mitchell is an American politician, diplomat, and lawyer, a leading member of the Democratic Party. He served as a United States Senator from Maine from 1980 to 1995 and as Senate Majority Leader from 1989 to 1995. After retiring from the Senate, Mitchell played a leading role in negotiations for peace and Northern Ireland and in the Middle East. He was appointed United States Special Envoy for Northern Ireland in 1995 to 2001 by President Clinton and as United States Special Envoy for the Middle East Peace 2009 through 2011 by President Barack Obama. Mitchell was a primary architect of the 1996 Mitchell Principles and the 1998 Good Friday Agreement in Northern Ireland and was the main investigator in two Mitchell reports.

One into the Arab-Israeli conflict and one on the use of performance enhancing drugs in baseball. Mitchell served as the chairman of the Walt Disney Company from March 2004 until January 2007 and later as chairman of the International Law Firm DLA Piper. He was the Chancellor of Queens University in Belfast, Northern Ireland from 1999 to 2009. Mitchell also served as a co-chair of the Housing Commission at the Bipartisan Policy Center. And then when you scroll down a little bit further here on his Wikipedia page, there's one little blurb about his Epstein relationship. You ready for it? Virginia Roberts, a woman who has long claimed that disgraced pedophile and convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein, forced her to have sex with powerful men named Mitchell in documents unsealed on August 9, 2019, a day before Epstein's death by a federal court in the southern

district of New York. The papers included affidavits and depositions of key witnesses in a 2015 lawsuit that Roberts filed against Epstein and his associate, Golan Maxwell. Roberts accused the two individuals of sex trafficking her to high-profile individuals including Mitchell in the early 2000s while she was underage. Mitchell denied ever having met or spoken with Roberts and stated that he became aware of Epstein's criminal prosecution only through the media. On November 30, 2021, Epstein's former pilot Larry Vesosky, named Mitchell as one of the people he recalled flying on one of Epstein's private planes. He claimed he had never seen sexual activity nor indication that such activity had taken place. Now remember, this whole entire thing as far as Epstein getting arrested the second time around was initiated because the Miami Herald ran a piece because Alex Acosta got that

job. Let's be very honest about what happened. They were looking for dirt when it came to Acosta and they found it. And that dirt was his connection to Jeffrey Epstein. And Acosta, as I've said a million times, should have, lost his job, should have, had all the ridicule that was thrown on top of him, but why did it stop there? Why did the legacy media stop at Alex Acosta when we have names like George Mitchell who is and was way more influential than Alex Acosta could ever hope to be? We're talking about the most powerful man in the Senate at one point. Not only that, but a man who was brokering these peace deals on a world stage. When you flip the script and you start looking at who he was working for and it all makes sense, right? Considering all of the ties Clinton has to Jeffrey Epstein, it all makes sense. But the legacy media refuses to dig deep here. They refuse to really go after the people that they should be going after. And so do all of these dumb ass Twitter accounts as well.

They're too busy trying to move some kind of political message with their nonsense. Oh, Tom Hanks is eating children and now he's locked in a basement in Guantanamo. Meanwhile the dude's doing movies and all of that stuff is provably false. So why even bother with it? Because the time spent on all of that dumb ass bullshit conspiracy theory nonsense is time spent away from the real scoundrels like George Mitchell and Bill Richardson. So for all the Epstein experts out there all of a sudden on Twitter talking about how they're gonna expose the whole entire enterprise, there's a name to start with. And then let's see your work with that name and then maybe I'll give you another one. I usually don't let that kind of shit bother me, but lately there has been like this push of a bunch of goofballs and I'm talking about people with like hundreds of thousands of followers making posts on Twitter that are absolutely ridiculous. And it's taking people away from the actualities that happened in this case. I don't know how many times I have to say it.

This is the case where you don't need to make anything up. This is delicious enough with the people involved that you don't need to bring in all sorts of other people where you don't have the evidence to prove that they did all the things that you're trying to say that they did. Meanwhile, George Mitchell has somebody who is pointing to him and saying he raped me. He was part of Jeffrey Epstein's criminal enterprise and he raped me and nobody did anything about it. Nobody's doing anything about it. So until action has been taken on the people that have already been named, you can miss me with all of the bullshit to try and drive traffic to your dumb ass Twitter page. All right, so now that my rant is out of the way, we can dive into this article from NBC News and see what author Chloe Atkins has for us. Headline JP Morgan seeks files from Manhattan DA and Jeffrey Epstein lawsuits. JP Morgan Chase is seeking documents from Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg's

office in lawsuits, the bank faces over its relationship with the late convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein, a former client, according to federal court records attorneys for Bragg, JP Morgan Chase, a former senior executive, Jess Staley, and the plaintiffs in the case attended a telephone conference before US District Judge Jed Raycoff on Tuesday. Raycoff instructed Bragg's office to provide a so-called privilege log relating to documents sought by the Wall Street giant by Friday. That's a list of documents Bragg's office argues are privileged and not subject to discovery. A spokesman for Bragg said a protective order is in place, so we cannot comment on the nature of the requested documents. They can never comment what it has to do with Epstein, huh? Can you guys comment on his death yet or do you need some more time to figure out what happened? You bunch of goofballs? JP Morgan Chase didn't immediately respond to a request for comment.

The bank faces two lawsuits filed last year by the US Virgin Islands and a woman identified as Jane Doe No. 1, accusing it of having facilitated Epstein's sex trafficking enterprise. JP Morgan knowingly, negligently, and unlawfully provided, and pulled the levers through which recruiters and victims were paid, and was indispensable to the operation and concealment of the Epstein Trafficking Enterprise, the US Virgin Islands alleged in a complaint. The two suits seek monetary damages. JP Morgan Chase has denied liability. Deutsche Bank agreed Wednesday to pay $75 million to Epstein victims to settle a lawsuit claiming it enabled Epstein's conduct. And it's crazy that these people can get off the hook once again. They're basically aiding and abetting sex trafficking, and nobody gets in trouble. Oh yeah, we're going to pay a fine. Oh, it's the biggest fine ever, big old. Yeah, like it's going to stop them. Is it a deterrent?

Until the next one, right? Yeah, it's the biggest fine until the next comeback uses their bank to molest a bunch of girls. Then we'll hear about how big the fine is again. It's all just a bunch of bullshit. I hope all of you see that. I hope you see what's going on here. When you have enough money, you can buy your way out of anything, even molesting little girls. JP Morgan Chase sued Staley and March, claiming he should be held liable for damages in my face from the lawsuits. It accuses Staley, who worked at the bank for more than 30 years, of knowing about Epstein's conduct and engaging in sexual activity with young women procured by Epstein. Staley asked for the lawsuits to be dismissed and said the bank is using him as a public relation shield. However, he has expressed regret for his relationship with Epstein. All this regret. I don't care about your regret. Save your sorries, save your eye should have done something else's. You all knew who he was, you knew what he was up to, and you all chose to chill with him.

JP Morgan Chase CEO, Jamie Diamond, is scheduled to be deposed in the lawsuits this month. In a Bloomberg television interview last week, he said he is so sad that we had any relationship to that man whatsoever. You know, we had top lawyers evaluating from the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission enforcement, the Justice Department, you know, and obviously had we known then what we know today, we would have done things differently, Diamond said, but it's very unfortunate and I have deep respect for these women. That doesn't mean that we're liable for the action of an individual, he added, but I do have deep respect for them, my heart goes out to them. No, you're not responsible for his actions, you're responsible for enabling his actions and facilitating them, you jackass. But JP Morgan Chase banking relationship was also known at the highest levels of the bank. The U.S. Virgin Islands said in court documents. In August 2008, internal email says, I would count Epstein's assets as a probable outflow

for 2008, 120 million or so. As I can't imagine, it will stay pending the diamond review and guess what, it stayed. Additional internal emails and memos filed as exhibits also revealed that bank executives had been worried about the financial institution's relationship with Epstein dating to 2006. Financial record showed Epstein uses his JP Morgan account to transfer around $3 million to women and girls from 2003 to 2013 according to records the plaintiffs filed as exhibits. The financial records do not disclose the names of those who receive the transfers or their connections to Epstein. And here's another breadcrumb for all of the super Epstein investigators out there on Twitter and elsewhere. Follow the money. Okay? Pretty simple right? Follow the money and you'll find everything that you're looking for. And the reason that we didn't see Rico here is because of all of these people who were

tied to Epstein financially. You really mean to tell me Epstein wasn't out here, engaging in money laundering and tax evasion and all the rest of it? Pretty much every transaction that dude made would have been illegal if he was hit under Rico predicates and that's why they didn't do it. They hit Keith Rayniri with Rico, right? Oh, they hit Arkelly with Rico, right? Oh, why not Golan Maxwell? Why not Jeffrey Epstein? Just ask yourselves that. During that time, Epstein withdrew a little over $5 million in cash, typically in amounts of $40,000 core document show, meanwhile Senator Tina Smith, Democrat of Minnesota, a member of the Banking Housing and Urban Affairs Committee, as Diamond in a letter last week, why the bank ignored obvious signs of Epstein's illegal activity and maintained a relationship with Epstein? Well, Tina Smith, why did George Mitchell, why did Bill Richardson, why did Bill Clinton? Go ask them that, you're a big Senator, right? You're this big time Senator, you're a big shot.

Go ask your buddies, go ask the people who used to call those very halls that you work in on a daily basis in DC home about Jeffrey Epstein and his illegal activity. And furthermore, Tina Smith, since you injected yourself into the conversation, I'm calling on you now to put together a whole last committee that digs deep into this and goes for Rico predicates or at the very least recommends Rico predicates. Put your money where your mouth is Tina Smith. If true, JPMorgan's decision to turn a blind eye to such egregious misconduct raises serious questions about its role in facilitating Epstein's abuse and its willingness or ability to root out and prevent other, less apparent, instances of sex trafficking, she said. And remember as well that the Congress and the Senate, they have their own slush fund of taxpayer dollars that they can access to pay off their own sexual harassment lawsuits. So these are the people we're relying on to go after people like Epstein, huh, and put

new laws on the books, talk about inspiring confidence. All right, folks, that's going to do it for this one. All of the information that goes with the episode can be found in the description box. Tyler Reddick here from 2311 Racing. Victory Lane? Yeah, it's even better with Chamba by my side. Race to chambacacino.com. Let's Chamba. No purchase necessary. VTW Group. Voidware prohibited by law. CTNCs. 21 Plus. Sponsored by Chamba Cacino.

More episodes

More from Jeffrey Epstein: The Coverup Chronicles

View all episodes →