Skip to content
TrackPodcasts
newsMar 3, 202611:39

Jes Staley Complains About Being Railroaded By The Epstein Allegations

About this episode

Jes Staley has repeatedly argued that he was unfairly railroaded by his association with Jeffrey Epstein, portraying himself as collateral damage in a scandal he claims was exaggerated and mischaracterized. In public statements and court filings, Jes Staley has insisted that his relationship with Epstein was overstated, that he had no knowledge of Epstein’s criminal conduct, and that the fallout cost him his career and reputation unjustly. Staley has framed the allegations as a narrative pile-on—suggesting that regulators, banks, and the media needed a single, convenient figure to absorb blame once Epstein’s crimes became impossible to ignore.

Those denials, however, collapse under the weight of the documented facts. Emails, travel records, and testimony show that Staley maintained a far closer and longer relationship with Jeffrey Epstein than he publicly acknowledged, including repeated personal contact well after Epstein’s 2008 conviction. Evidence revealed during regulatory investigations and litigation contradicts Staley’s claims of distance and ignorance, exposing a pattern of sustained engagement that undercuts his credibility. When set against the paper trail, Staley’s insistence that he was merely an unlucky bystander rings hollow—less a case of being railroaded, and more an example of how implausible denials unravel once they’re tested against emails, calendars, and sworn findings.


to contact me:

[email protected]

Get every episode summarized

Each time Jeffrey Epstein: The Coverup Chronicles publishes, we email you a written briefing from the transcript — the topics, who appeared, and any specific claims, with the ad reads skipped.

Email me new episodes

Free for 3 shows. No card needed.

Hosts & guests

Transcript ready

212 searchable segments. Every word is indexed and playable.

Jes Staley Complains About Being Railroaded By The Epstein Allegations

Jeffrey Epstein: The Coverup Chronicles

0:00
11:39

Full transcript

Jeffrey Epstein: The Coverup ChroniclesJes Staley Complains About Being Railroaded By The Epstein Allegations. Machine-transcribed; use the interactive transcript above to jump the player to any line.

Tyler Reddick here from 2311 Racing. Another checkered flag for the books. Time to celebrate with Jamba. Jump in at JambaCasino.com. Let's Jamba. No purchase necessary. BTW Group, Void We're Prohibited by Mar. CCNC's 21 Plus, sponsored by JambaCasino. I'm Lee, here to dig into conspiracies that will make you question everything. And I'm Oli, here to make sure we don't contact aliens again. Tune into the daily conspiracy podcast where we uncover the bizarre and the unexplained. And I try to make sure we don't summon anything like Bathamette or worse, like my mother-in-law. If you're ready to question reality with a grin, listen to us wherever you get your podcasts. We are the daily conspiracy podcast. Because reptilians don't take days off. What's up, everyone?

And welcome back to the Epstein Chronicles. Just daily in JP Morgan are going back and forth over what's going on down in the Virgin Islands. And I'll tell you what, it's getting a bit contentious. The allegations that are being thrown this way and that by both parties are almost laughable at this point for me. Considering both parties are obviously on the hook for what happened here. And instead of just owning up to that, they're trying to say, well, I might have been wrong, but this guy over here, he was more wrong than I was. So you should focus on him more than you focus on us. It's a classic attempt to muddy the waters. When the reality is both groups, meaning the management structure of JP Morgan and just daily and anybody around him, they all knew the deal. They knew what Epstein was up to. They knew he was a dirt bag scumbag son of a bitch. And they knew that he was molesting and hurting people. They didn't care. That's what it comes down to. They did not care that Epstein was engaging in all of this behavior

because he was bringing other rich scumbags to the bank. And as long as that was happening and the money kept flowing in, then everybody was very content to hang out with Epstein. They were all content to take his money. They were all content to do business with them. Well, guess what? Now it's time to answer some questions. Today's article is from NBC News and the headline. JP Morgan alleges former executive thwarted efforts to cut ties with Epstein. The bank claimed that Staley knew of Epstein sex trafficking and engaged in sexual activity with young women procured by Epstein. Staley has said he is being used as a PR shield. And honestly, all of that is true. They are using him as a PR shield, but he was engaged in all of Epstein's bullshit. And according to at least some reports, he was involved in the actual abuse of some of these girls. So that elevates him from just an enabler to absolute piece of shit status

right up there with guys like, you know, Bill Richardson, Glenn Dubin, George Mitchell, and the rest of them. This article was authored by Chloe Atkins. JP Morgan Chase claimed its former executive, Jess Staley, repeatedly thwarted its efforts to cut ties with convicted sex offender, Jeffrey Epstein, during Staley's tenure at the bank. According to court documents filed this week. So you mean to tell me that Jess Staley could tell Jamie Diamond what to do? He could tell the executive board what to do. I don't buy that for a minute. And the fact that they're going to get out here and try and pitch that to people is pretty laughable. I don't think people are buying that bullshit anymore. It's like when we were kids, right? Well, those of us that are older anyway, our parents could tell us anything. And we couldn't fact check it. We'd have to go to the library to look something up. But now we can go right to the internet, take a look, and know you're a bullshitting us. So same goes here.

Nobody was thwarting anything, okay? You weren't trying to get rid of Jeffrey Epstein. And in fact, what you're doing is lying to us. But unlike the old days, we can go and check now and verify, well, that you're lying. The Wall Street giant sued Staley in March, saying he should be held liable for any financial damages it might have to pay from two lawsuits that alleged it enabled Epstein's sex trafficking operation. Now, imagine, just sit back in the cut for a minute and let that sink in. Not one bit of talk about criminal sanction, not one bit of talk about anyone going to prison. Once again, just another financial slap. Staley, who worked at the bank for more than 30 years, asked a federal judge last month to dismiss the lawsuit, saying the bank was using him as a public relation shield. In response, the bank this week alleged that Staley, new of Epstein's sex trafficking enterprise, and engaged in sexual activity with young women procured by Epstein,

but acted to protect himself and Epstein, who could have exposed Staley's misconduct. Court documents said, so they're going in all the way on Jess Staley. According to JP Morgan, folks, everything was Jess Staley's fault. He's the only guy here who had anything to do with Jeffrey Epstein. And of course, he made every decision for the company as well. According to this lawsuit, now back to reality, we know that's not the case. We know that there are many channels that this sort of thing has to go through. We know that there's an auditing department, there's risk management, and all of these different levers of security, all of these redundancies were bypassed. You mean to tell me that Jess Staley had that kind of power? I mean, I guess it's possible, but if that's the case, and you're a shareholder of JP Morgan, do you have any faith in Jamie Diamond at this point? Bro, you can't even control your underlings to not pal around with Jeffrey Epstein.

Why do you think that you should run this whole ass company? Seems like a pretty straightforward question, right? Unfortunately, none of these goofballs in the legacy media will ever ask it. Staley persisted for years in protecting Epstein in the face of attempts by JPMC personnel to end the company's relationship with Epstein on reputational grounds, made misrepresentations in the process, and continued to do so to the end of his JP Morgan tenure. The bank said in the court filing, and Epstein victim has alleged that Staley sexually abused her while he was working at the bank, court documents said, and look, I believe the accuser who is saying this, especially if the accuser is who I think it is. If that's the case, the whole entire thing is about the fallen on the head of JP Morgan and Jess Staley, because this survivor was with Epstein all the time from the time she was 14. And if that's the case, and it is who I think it is,

she has all the keys to the kingdom. She knows everything. She knows all the people who were around. She knows all the people who were involved. And I'm sure she's found a very receptive audience to hear her stories when we're talking about the United States Virgin Islands and their legal team. JP Morgan Chase said this week that it did not know, nor could it have reasonably known of the woman's allegations. Staley's attorneys did not immediately respond to her request for comment. Staley has called the accusations baseless, but has expressed regret for his relationship with Epstein. Once again, he is not regretful that he had a relationship with Jeffrey Epstein. He is regretful that he was caught. He is regretful that all of you out there are put in his ass on blast on a regular basis. That's what he's worried about. That's what he regrets. Epstein was convicted of procuring a child for prostitution in 2008. He died by suicide in 2019

at a Manhattan Correctional Center, where he was being held on federal sex trafficking charges. Allegedly, died by suicide, by the way. Has anyone seen any real concrete evidence telling us he died by suicide? Or are we just going by what the medical examiner and good old Bill Barr told us? Because I don't believe either of them. Bubba Wallace here from 2311 Racing. You know what's slower than a pace car? Waiting at the car wash. That's when I fire up Chamba Casino. It turns those slow minutes into fast fun. With new games every week, you'll never get bored. Next time you're stuck in the slow lane, speed up with Chamba. Play now at chambacasino.com. Let's Chamba. Sponsored by Chamba Casino. No purchase necessary, VGW GroupFord, where prohibited by law, 21 plus terms and conditions apply. According to statistics, the average person walks past 36 murders in their lifetime. Unlike in Hollywood movies, they're not easy to spot.

They seamlessly blend into our everyday lives, assuming rules as friendly neighbors, helpful colleagues, or even the person lying beside you each night. I wanted to be out of jail. I couldn't wait till I got out. I was in there with someone who was clearly psychopathic. Using investigative research and primary audio, morbidology is an award-winning, true crime podcast that shines a light on the darkest corners of humanity. Through our investigation, we have attained evidence, which we are not releasing at this time, which leads us to believe Jolene is not alive. Turn into morbidology each week across all podcast platforms. They keep telling you that the Jeffrey Epstein story is finished, that it was investigated, that it was handled. But here's the part that they never explained, why the charges were so narrow when the conduct was so broad. How does a man with multiple properties, private aircraft, international travel, and a documented pipeline of victims get treated like a lone offender?

Why were logistics treated as background noise instead of evidence? Why were facilitators reduced to footnotes instead of defendants? Well, that's where we come in. The Epstein chronicles exist because those questions were never answered. This podcast breaks down what the public record actually shows, the deals that kept exposure, the decisions that limited scope, and the moments where prosecutors chose restraint overreach. If you ever wondered why this case feels unfinished, why accountability stopped at the perimeter, or why so many names remain officially invisible, you've come to the right place. Welcome to the Epstein Chronicles. JP Morgan Chase was sued by the US Virgin Islands and a woman identified as Jane Doe 1 last year, claiming it turned a blind eye towards Epstein's conduct. Well, so do the Virgin Islands, right? The USVI has some audacity here considering Epstein went down there, set up shop, cotton bed with local officials, started doling out a bunch of dough, and committed all of these

crimes down in your territory. Yet somehow you still come out smelling like roses, meaning the Virgin Islands with a big fat bankroll, and looking for more. Pretty amazing if you ask me. Internal emails and memos filed as exhibits this week reveal that the bank executives were concerned about the financial institution's relationship with Epstein dating to 2006. In October 2006, the bank's rapid response team issued a memo saying Epstein had banking, asset, and credit accounts with balances that amounted to $32 million. The memo also said cash withdrawals were routinely made in sums of 40,000 to 80,000 multiple times a month, totaling over $750,000 a year to date. According to the document, no big deal there. I mean, it's not like he was structuring those transactions, right? Oh, wait, he was. And here I was thinking, at least according to JP Morgan, that they had no idea what was going

on when that is demonstrably provable to be a lie. The memo said that after internal discussions with Jess Staley, Mary Erdos, Catherine Keating, John Duffy, and Mary Kasey, it was decided that we will keep Mr. Epstein solely as a banking client and on a reactive client service basis. And that we will not proactively solicit new investment business from him. Another month later, and borrow which JP Morgan Chase executive emailed Staley with the subject line, Epstein, please call me. In the email she said she had concerns on risk management with this client. And we have a bad track record internally on risk, as you know, is Jeffrey going to stay involved here? How are we managing risk here? Please call borrow which said in an email. In 2013, two bank directors emailed about the private bank risk unit, referring Epstein in 2008 to its anti-money laundering program

because of excessive cash activity and media reports alleging his connection to sex trafficking. Epstein was marked as high risk at the time. That's all they did though. You can mark on whatever you want, but you have to take action. They did not take action. Remember, that's what it comes down to. Another email exchange from 2011 indicates that the bank kept Epstein as a client due to Jess's personal relationship with them, even though other bank directors were not in favor of having retained them as a client. So they knew JP Morgan knew and they let Jess Staley do whatever he wanted. Remember, he was working for them at the time. So the buck stops at JP Morgan. One director in the same email correspondence reported having also looked into transactions of one of Epstein's assistants, which included lots of salon, lingerie shops, drug stores, in New York, Palm Beach, and in St. Thomas, his places of residence, plus lots of video-like girls

gone wild. There is no doubt that not only Jess Staley knew exactly what and who Jeffrey Epstein was and so did JP Morgan in Chase. So the whole back and forth between JP Morgan and Jess Staley is relatively laughable and hopefully the court comes down on both of them like a ton of bricks. All right folks, that's going to do it for this one. All of the information that goes with the episode can be found in the description box. Tyler Reddick here from 2311 Racing. Victory Lane? Yeah, it's even better with Chamba by my side. Race to chambacasino.com. Let's Chamba.

More episodes

More from Jeffrey Epstein: The Coverup Chronicles

View all episodes →