About this episode
Thema: Anschaulichkeit
Um diese Studie geht es:
Harp, S. F., & Mayer, R. E. (1998). How seductive details do their damage: A theory of cognitive interest in science learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90(3), 414–434.
Weitere Forschung:
Alter, A. L., & Oppenheimer, D. M. (2009). Uniting the tribes of fluency to form a metacognitive nation. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 13(3), 219–235.
Kaminski, J. A., Sloutsky, V. M., & Heckler, A. F. (2008). The advantage of abstract examples in learning math. Science, 320(5875), 454–455.
Rey, G. D. (2012). A review of research and a meta-analysis of the seductive detail effect. Educational Research Review, 7(3), 216–237.
Get every episode summarized
Each time Psychologie fürs Klassenzimmer publishes, we email you a written briefing from the transcript — the topics, who appeared, and any specific claims, with the ad reads skipped.
Email me new episodesFree for 3 shows. No card needed.
Hosts & guests
No transcript yet
This episode has not been transcribed. Request it and it moves to the front of the queue.
More episodes
More from Psychologie fürs Klassenzimmer
Schmidt et al. (2022) | Vertrauen in Wissenschaft
Psychologie fürs Klassenzimmer
Luo et al. (2018) | Mitschriften
Psychologie fürs Klassenzimmer
Bennewitz & Wegner (2017) | Elterngespräche
Psychologie fürs Klassenzimmer
Tetzlaff et al. (2025) | Instruktion versus Selbstorganisation
Psychologie fürs Klassenzimmer