Greta Thunberg ADMITS It Was NEVER About Climate Change

0:00This is all wrong. I shouldn't be up here. I should be back in school on the other side of the ocean. Yet you all come to us young people for hope. How dare you? You have stolen my dreams and my childhood with your empty words. Yet I'm one of the lucky ones. People are suffering. People are dying. And tired ecosystems are collapsing. We are in the beginning of a mass extinction. And all you can talk about is money and fairytales of eternal economic growth. How dare you? So that was Greta Tumberg giving a speech on the world stage back in September of 2019. And of course, this was the infamous How dare you speech where she lectured the world on how we're destroying the entire environment. And we're

1:02doing so in order to perpetuate capitalism, which in this particular speech she describes as eternal economic growth. Now of course, the mainstream media gave us this idea, this origin story behind Greta Tumberg back in the day that was absurd at the time and grows ever more absurd each and every day. That essentially she was somebody who just organically rose to fame because she decided to stop going to school because she was worried about global warming and somehow through magical steps that are unbeknownst to the world, her cutting class didn't result in her getting arrested for truancy. It resulted in her speaking at major economic forms, talking to a bunch of different world leaders. And of course, lecturing us on policy while at the same time pretending that we were asking her for her advice, when that doesn't make any sense at all. Again, if you have an IQ above room temperature, if you're capable of thinking, you understand that Greta Tumberg was completely an artificial creation. You wouldn't be surprised to learn that both of her parents were in

2:03fact left-wing activists and they decided to craft this narrative around her in order to shove this stupid and mentally disabled according to her parents girl in our face in order to lecture us about the sins of being in a modern western country and about the sins of not being in the third world. However, of course Greta Tumberg has come under a lot of scrutiny as of late due to the fact that she is supporting the shipping of oil to Cuba when her whole entire activism back in the day would originally had her burst onto the scene, what's her association with organizations like stop oil, and of course her commitment supposedly to saving the environment from evil bad carbon emissions. But in reality, while a lot of people are making fun of Greta calling her a hypocrite, she doesn't even hesitate in taking both of these actions. And the reason for that is because it is not hypocritical at all whatsoever for Greta to support cutting off oil to the Western world while at the same time hoping that oil makes it to Cuba in order to prop up their communist regime. Because

3:06guess what Greta Tumberg was never an environmentalist, she was always 100% an anti-capitalist, anti-Western, and anti-American figure. And every single thing in her activism indicates that whatever cause of the day she's championing is just a superficial cover for that mission, which is the destruction of capitalism and the Western world. And as soon as you realize that and stop calling her a hypocrite, you can actually fight back against her. And this is what we're going to talk about today. But before we do, I want to think everybody who supports this channel via actualjusticewater.com slash join. Give me the money. Give you. Give me the money. Okay, I'll tell you. So I want to give you guys a little bit of a personal anecdote from my life before I met my wife when I was dating a girl who was taking gender studies class and identified herself as a feminist. Well, on one of our dates, we ended up discussing a paper that she was writing for university. And the focus of this paper was supposed to be about restrictions to reproductive rights across the world. And of course, during

4:10the course of the conversation, she had a lot of focus on the United States of America. By the way, this was well before the repeal of Roe v Wade. So abortion was still legal across the nation. But she harped on a lot of tiki tack laws that were in the south of the United States of America. Even though again, broad access to abortion was a thing that was available in all 50 states in this union. So I brought up as a counter example as something that maybe she could include information related to China's one child policy forced abortions and all sorts of other restrictions that they ended up placing on children. However, she refused to hear that because the one child policy, according to her, wasn't actually implemented in western countries. Therefore, it was a cultural difference. Therefore, it could not be included in the same conversation about reproductive health and reproductive freedom worldwide. Even though again, it's one of the most onerous and destructive instances of a restriction on reproductive freedom that we've ever seen in the history of humanity. And the thing is originally back in the day

5:13over 10 years ago, I believe that this was hypocritical. I believe that there was a contradiction in the ideology, but the thing that I learned back then and still carry with me to this very day is that there's actually no contradiction. The entire point of those gender studies classes, the entire point of the paper she was tasked to write was to attack the United States of America, was to attack the western world. And this China example is very apt in terms of a comparison to Greta Thunberg because as many people had pointed out throughout the course of her activism, she seemed to only target western nations that already had carbuna missions reducing in those countries like the United States of America, which by the way is one of the fastest reducing carbon emitters in the entire world due to the fact that we're switching from coal to natural gas again based on market reasons not based on government subsidies. And yet Greta never seemed to have any criticism for China that was increasing their carbon output. She never seemed to have

6:13any criticism for India that was also increasing their carbon output in addition to that environmentalist organizations. Typically, even though they say CO2 is their top concern, we're opposed to nuclear power. And the reason all of these things are true at the same time is because climate change, all these causes, their purpose is to in fact punish the west, reduce our standard of living, defend the third world by of course attacking the first world. And this is why you have all of these seemingly contradictory positions because again, the cause is just a pair of pants that they put on that suits the situation and they toss it. But at their core, who they are, the thing that they're trying to cover up is the fact that they hate the west, they hate the United States of America and they want to destroy us. Now before one of you says, well actually Greta did in fact criticize China in 2021 that one time for their admissions, I will point out that it is in no way shape or form anywhere near in proportion to the scale of the problem and also her activism

7:17related to India also in 2021 had to do with a former protest not really of the same ilk in my humblest of humble opinions and still does not contradict the overall point of the Omni narrative. For more than 30 years, the science has been crystal clear. How dare you continue to look away and come here saying that you're doing enough when the politics and solutions needed are still nowhere in sight. I mean do you guys notice the fact that the same people that are aligned with Greta Tunberg on her environmentalist mission have the same exact position or have the same exact position on the Black Lives Matter rights and of course how evil white racism was at the heart of every issue. Did you guys notice the fact that the very same people including Greta Tunberg were in fact supporting those causes? Did you notice or find it weird that on the Black Lives Matter official website, they had an entire section in it about how the destruction of the family was

8:17absolutely crucial and coincidentally the same people that agree with the environmentalism of Greta Tunberg the anti-white racism of Black Lives Matter also buy into all the LGBT stuff. These are the same people that want to trans your kids. Did you also find it weird that these are the same people who have the same exact position on Israel Palestine? I mean Greta Tunberg completely switched up after October 7th from talking about oil and ecosystems and evil white racism when it came to Black Lives Matter to suddenly bringing in stuff into the Palestinian territory in order to fight back against the settler colonial Israelis. And again, you don't have to support Israel or each and every one of my positions on each and every one of these issues to understand that what motivates them to unite all of their positions on all of these issues is anti-Western values. But the reason these people are all universally on the pali side is because they believe the Israelis are an outpost of the West. They call them settler colonialists. They're tied into the

9:22United States of America who they deem to be the great Satan. They deem to be the great polluter, the great problem in all of the world. And this is why if you're opposed to the United States of America or it's allies you will 100% find Greta Tunberg on your side. Even if it means she's going to help ship oil to the island of Cuba because again, the communist vision is far more important than global warming which was never actually about saving the planet. It was about destroying the West in the first place. Again, all of these people are also supportive of mass Islamic migration to the West even though again, they say that the energy usage of the West and people living in those countries is far too high to be sustainable for the planet. And yet all of these people from the third world are entitled to come and use up all that energy, pollute all that they want to pollute because again, it is about destruction of the West and outposts and visages of the West. And by the way, you can disagree with any of the positions or agree with any of the

10:26individual positions that these individuals have. But the fact is as a whole, these positions are directionally in the way of destroying the Western world. That is their goal. That is the entire purpose of it. And I'm tired of people saying that these people are hypocrites when in reality, they're working against you and you should start paying attention to that. Again, how many people will you see on television talking about the war in Iran right now and discussing it in terms of women's rights in Iran and whether or not they have to wear the hijab or not wear the hijab and they talk about how people are so hypocritical because they purport to be feminists in the United States of America. But they're supporting one of the most repressive regimes to women and to gaze in the entire world. Like how many times are you going to have to hear that commentary before realizing that the reason these people describe themselves as feminists in the United States of America is because they want to target the American family. They want to bring in because of intersectional feminism, a bunch of third-worlders in order to change the voting demographics of our nation

11:31in order to get what they want politically, not because they actually care about equality of women. So in the third world where they're oppressing women, that's totally fine because that oppression is considered a rejection of Western values. And guess what? The feminists in the first world are feminists because they want to reject Western values. Again, guys, the actual position is destroying the United States of America. Every single cause that they happen to be on this side or that side of an issue is just window dressing. It's just positioning it in order to best propagandize against you in order to make you hate yourselves, make you hate your own civilization. And by the way, if you're not in the United States of America, this also applies broadly to Western civilization, but the goal, the omnicaws, is still 100% the same. I remember I reacted to some clip on social media of a literal best friend, Anna Kasperian, and supposedly her hypocrisy on the issue of how many protesters were killed in Iran. Let me play that clip so you can hear that.

12:33Very questionable peers. Where did you get that number from? How many do you think we killed? We don't know the exact number, but to say that 30,000 people were slaughtered during those like short weeks is ridiculous to me. That's been widely reported and it's around 3,000. We don't know what the exact number is, but you really think 30,000 people were killed? You're not going to question that. You're on 30,000? Well, I'm curious if you don't think it's 30,000. How many do you think it was? I don't know the exact number. No one knows the exact number. Now, look, you can get into a factual argument about how many protesters were killed in the protest movement in January of this year in Iran. Conservative estimates put it from 3 to 5,000. The less conservative estimates put it up near 40,000. But I need you guys to really understand it, that to Anna Kasperian, it makes no matter. Okay, you can make that point. I'm questioning the... Hang on one second, please. I'm questioning the use of the word courageous about a ruthless, despotic monster. And I'm curious why you are so confident it's not 30,000 people who were killed,

13:34but you have no idea how many people were killed. How can you be sure it wasn't 30,000? No, I don't. I don't know how many people were killed. You don't know how many people were killed. You don't know it wasn't 30,000. The highest number you've heard is questionable to say the least. Especially when you know that Assad was on the ground, there were armed terrorists on the ground. You know security forces were killed during those shootings. Look, the hyenas laughing again. Anyway, but just to regurgitate the number that is being perpetuated by the Israelis as ridiculous to me. We don't know the exact number. So rather than regurgitate it, we can say that there was high casualty count. We don't know the exact number. It's that simple. But you teach to regurgitate the number. Hang on. Hang on. Hang on. Let me please let me finish. You did regurgitate with respect. All the numbers given to you by the Hamas run health authority of Palestinian casualty. It could have been 100,000, 200,000, even a million and it would not change her calculation. It would not change the fact that her and Jank are going to continue to praise the Ayatollah and the Iranian regime because the Omni cause is the West is bad and Iran is obviously opposed to the West and opposed to Israel, which of course is a representation in

14:38these people's minds of the West, whether you agree with that characterization of Israel or not. So of course, that's why Jank went out of his way to praise the courage of the Ayatollah and how brave he was and how he died on his feet and how people should be proud of this ruler, even though in theory, two different atheists that are hosting the show called the Young Turks should be opposed to a theocratic regime that cracks down on the freedoms of LGBT people and of course, of women throughout their country as a matter of policy. But the thing is, that doesn't matter because as long as they are on the right side of whether America bad or America good, they are going to be on the side of the Iranians. But I agree. But hang on. Hang on. Hang on. Hang on. Hang on a second. Hang on a second. Hang on a second. Hang on a second. Hang on a second. Hang on a second. Hang on a second. I've said multiple times. I don't agree or like there's a need in Iran. That doesn't mean, that doesn't mean that it's untrue, that they never capitulated to what Israel demanded of them. Whereas here in the United States, we literally spill blood and use our treasure on behalf of Israel.

15:43That's the point that Jank went out of his way. And I think it's a pretty accurate one. This is why the TYT coverage of the Iran United States, Israel war, is nonstop about how the Iranians are just the superior fighting force and they're absolutely devastating us in every possible way. Now to be clear, that doesn't mean that intervention in Iran is inherently good policy because these people are on the side of the Iranians. It just tells you their point of view why they take this position. And by the way, why Greta Tumberg going back to the basics is also completely in line with them on this position. And for those of you who are saying, but Sean, we got to point out the hypocrisy because they're saying 70,000 people who died over the course of two plus years in war in Gaza is a genocide pushing that pretend to side narrative. But then when it's maybe 40,000 people killed in Iran who are protesting against the regime, they don't want to talk about it. Again, both of those things are not in conflict with one another. They are part of the Omni narrative, which is West bad, America bad, and as long as they view

16:45Israel as an outpost of the West, which by the way, there's some dispute among these left-wing individuals about whether or not they're the oppressed because they're Jews or the oppressors because innocent baba angel Muslims around the world are always the victims. But that again makes no matter. The Omni cause is always the same. That's why you can predict each and every one of their positions from the jump with small variants again on individual issues. What I really need you guys to take away from this is that these people are actually not being hypocritical. They are actually completely in line. Even though again, superficially, you might view them as being hypocrites. When Greta Tumberg says that everybody needs to stop using oil and she joins an organization meant to disrupt the industry and does all sorts of stunts that are seemingly against oil, only to turn around and say that Cuba needs to have their oil. Iranian oil needs to be free and she says nothing about China's energy policy. That is not because she has flipped her position or she's inconsistent. It's because she's actually remarkably consistent. Because again, the only

17:50reason she took those environmentalist positions in the first place was not to save the environment. It was to destroy the West and if it helps destroy the West or subvert the West or undermine the West, whether it's credibility or in terms of logistic undermining, she is going to support that even if it means embracing oil. Again, the reason they support transiting your kids and having everything be gay throughout all of our society and of course mass islamic migration which is inherently intolerant to homosexuals is because their goal isn't to support the gays or support the transes or support the islamists. It's to undermine your core culture so they know if they can use liberalism in order to convince you to sacrifice your own kids to the LGBT syndrome, then guess what they're on board with that. They know that if they bring an islamist and they can pressure you again, using the better angels of your nature in order to protect their religious faith as they install their own as a law above you, they're going to support that. Get it through your head.

18:51They're not hypocritical. Their plan is to destroy you, but you know what? Those are just my thoughts. They happen to be 100% accurate, but I want to know what you guys think down in the comments below. If you like this video shown by leaving a like, subscribe for more content, follow me on the social medias, support me the support links in the description of this video. This has been me talking about Greta Thunberg and the Omnicaws. Till next time.