
Episode 0026 - Providing Effective Criticism by Identifying the Correct Problem
About this episode
For a long time now I have noticed that people with very different world views can criticize a policy, law, or event, but provide very different arguments in doing so. They can see the same problem, but their solutions could lead to very different results. This is interesting because our society is full of these critiques, but the solutions range from non-effective to ridiculous. All problem solving begins with effective problem identification. In this episode, we critique a guest of "Democracy Now" named John Nichols. He wrote a book criticizing the corporate windfall that flowed to companies like Pfizer, and he skewers billionaires for getting rich off the sale of the mRNA vaccine. Is this the right way to look at what happened? Join me and let's find out where Mr. Nichols goes wrong in his analysis.
Get every episode summarized
Each time Who Gets to Decide? publishes, we email you a written briefing from the transcript — the topics, who appeared, and any specific claims, with the ad reads skipped.
Email me new episodesFree for 3 shows. No card needed.
Hosts & guests
No transcript yet
This episode has not been transcribed. Request it and it moves to the front of the queue.
More episodes
More from Who Gets to Decide?

Eps 646 - Missing Trillions and Underground Bunkers
Who Gets to Decide?

Eps 645 - TRUMP Bombs Iran...Same Ole Playbook
Who Gets to Decide?

Eps 644 - MAGA Won't Fix America...MTG is Right!
Who Gets to Decide?

Eps 643 - CBDC and The New Control Gid Incoming!
Who Gets to Decide?