About this episode
This week, we're presenting a remastered version of our VERY FIRST EPISODE. Take a walk down NST memory lane, or visit for the first time, and stick around until the end to hear a quick conversation looking back on one of our earliest arguments.
What began as an innocent debate soon devolved into accusations of deception and trickery. Is it misleading to say you read a book if, in actuality, you listened to it as an audiobook? And do you absorb information the same way when listening compared to reading? With some help from Dr. Virginia Clinton-Lisell, Associate Professor at University of North Dakota, we get an answer.
If you liked this episode, you might like NST #59: Kids can't read anymore. Does it matter? (with author Jason Reynolds)
Here’s a link to Dr. Clinton-Lisell’s meta-analysis of reading and listening comprehension comparisons. She’s on TikTok, YouTube, Threads, and Bluesky.
Buy Manny's book Colored People Time here!
For more, please subscribe to our newsletter at www.nosuchthing.show.
Have a question you want us to answer? Email us at [email protected] or leave a voicemail at (860) 325-0286
See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
Get every episode summarized
Each time NO SUCH THING publishes, we email you a written briefing from the transcript — the topics, who appeared, and any specific claims, with the ad reads skipped.
Email me new episodesFree for 3 shows. No card needed.
Hosts & guests
No transcript yet
This episode has not been transcribed. Request it and it moves to the front of the queue.
More episodes
More from NO SUCH THING
A musician defends using AI in his music (Part 2)
NO SUCH THING
Can AI music be good? (Part 1)
NO SUCH THING
Are cops stalking you with a nationwide camera network? (Inside Flock)
NO SUCH THING
Are suburban dogs happier than city dogs? (Remastered)
NO SUCH THING