
Get every episode summarized
Each time Daf Yomi By Chazaras HaDaf publishes, we email you a written briefing from the transcript — the topics, who appeared, and any specific claims, with the ad reads skipped.
Email me new episodesFree for 3 shows. No card needed.
About this episode
“Masech begins with the topic of Petr Khammar. If you own a donkey and its first born as a male, and it's with Dusha's Bighar, you redeem it with a se and give the se to a kain. Zaktimishna halak'ah, Ober Khammar, you shall ever get havin.”From the transcript
Get every episode summarized
Each time Daf Yomi By Chazaras HaDaf publishes, we email you a written briefing from the transcript — the topics, who appeared, and any specific claims, with the ad reads skipped.
Email me new episodesFree for 3 shows. No card needed.
Hosts & guests
Transcript ready
702 searchable segments. Every word is indexed and playable.
Full transcript
Daf Yomi By Chazaras HaDaf — Bechoros 02 Chazara. Machine-transcribed; use the interactive transcript above to jump the player to any line.
Today we begin Masech's Bighar. Masech begins with the topic of Petr Khammar. If you own a donkey and its first born as a male, and it's with Dusha's Bighar, you redeem it with a se and give the se to a kain. Zaktimishna halak'ah, Ober Khammar, you shall ever get havin. If somebody purchases the fetus of a donkey that belongs to a guy, that fetus is a Bighar, and it's still in the womb of its mother, Vahamwe Khirlai, or it's the Yisrael that owns the mother and sells the fetus to a guy, Ahopee Shain Rashai, even though it's not allowed to sell that Ober to the guy. Rashai rings the gomar and he will deserve it. He says, you cannot sell a Bighar, Maghassa to a guy, because there's malachat that's being done on chabnis. Fakrites is the only one that's just a halva, you know, in the gomar and the gomar, the gomar is matchah that, because who cares if it does malachat on chabnis, if it's owned by the gomar, there's no problem with Shwiza Shabnis. The gomar says that it's a Gzera, Ahtu Shaila and Skires. If you lend it to the gomar, or you lend it to the gomar, where the Yisrael is still the owner, then it's a problem of Shwiza Shabnis. The Ramisah that learns in Rashai, that Rashai holds that Argomara is disagreeing with the gomar and holds it the reason why
you cannot sell a Bigham Aghassa to a guy, is because you're removing it from Pradesh Shabnis. While you owned it, it was austere to work on chabnis, you give it to the gomar, it's not going to work on chabnis, that is a problem of removing it from the Gdusha Shabnis. Can you use the mission with a letter of, the Hamish Tateh, or if you become a partner with the gomar, you and the gomar put your money together and you purchase a donkey and then has a bighar, the Hamish Kabul Hemeno. If you accept the donkey from a guy, you have the responsibility of raising that donkey and you want to split the bloodies. The mother belongs to the guy, the Yisrael accept responsibility, and the prophet is going to take half of the bloodies, but the goof of the mother, that belongs to the guy, the Hanay-Sanleibbaka-Balala, or the reverse. The Yisrael he owns a donkey, and he gives it to the guy, the guy accepts responsibility for that donkey, and again, he's going to take half of the bloodshed as a scar. The brother and the brother, in all these cases, it's part of the bighar. In the case where he buys the upper from the guy, so the guy owns the mother, and the Yisrael owns the upper or the reverse, the Yisrael owns the mother and sells the upper to the guy,
or they are partners in the mother, or they're partners in the bloodies and all these cases, there is no Goduja's bighar since the guy has a portion in either the mother or the bighar. Shanaway the Patsik says, Bighi'srael empires the member of Tateh, he's going to take half of the blood, call bighi'srael with Ashin Avaloy, but not if it's owned by Goy. Zakhdiq and Mark Alhani, why do I need all these cases in the mission? I have the case of Halakah, Uber, Hamayyra, Hamish Tateh, Hamakabal, Hamayyra, and all of them have the same theme. The reason why there's no Goduja's bighar is because the guy is a khilikin, why don't you all five? Zakhdiq and I need all five. The eternal the kef, if the mission only said the first case, that if you buy the upper of the Khamaar from the guy, it's part of the Khamaar, have a meaner mission to come by, see the lakduja. I would think the reason why it's part of it is because you bring it into kuduja, now that you own it, it's going to have shvisa shabas. And since you're doing the mitsua, there's no reason to give you a knaas. Avalo meh, the Khamaaf, Khilikin, Miduja, but when you sell the upper to a Goy, we're now you're removing that upper from kuduja. While you own it, it's going to be shivers and shabas. Now you're selling the goy, you're removing it from kuduja shabas,
aim a lignusay, I would say, make a knaas, that is to buy that upper back from the guy and give it to the guy, and Khamaar, that's the mission telling me, we don't give a knaas and remains pater from the Khar. The Hamish Tata of La Lamalee, why do we need to miss the density of the third case, when you become a shuta for the guy, the shita explains that once we say that when you buy the upper, where the upper is owned entirely by the Israel, still it's pater, so when you're just a shuta for the Israel, only owns part of it, do I need to miss the tummy that you're pater? And for them, I'm a affrucate, I'm a debut to exclude the shita review, the armor shuffles of Khama Khilikin, the shita, he says, that the ownership that a Goy has together with you, it's still going to be Khai of the Mkhar, we're going to see a rise at the bottom of the armad, if a person accepts a responsibility to take care of the animal of a Goy, and then it has the Bukhara, that Bukhara is now owned partially by the Goy, and partially by the Israel, you evaluate that Bukhara, and the Israel has to give half of its value to the Khai. Khama Shman de Batur, when a Bukhara, that's the shita in the mission, to say, not like the shita review, though, when there's a shuta for the Goy, it's pater from the Khar, the Hamish Tata of La Lamalee, why don't you do the next case in the mission, where you accept the responsibility
of taking care of the Goy's animal, and you can exploit the Vadas. Why does that say that you're pater from the Khar? The Goy owns the entire mother, and half of the Bukhara, so for sure it's pater. After we're mission the Goy, we missed the Varnous Love of Gawal in Khanami, the Mkhabal is not any Khadish, but it says that I have the case of a Hanoi Salam of Gawal, where the Israel owns it, and he gives the mother to the Goy, and the Goy is going to take half the Vadas, but Hanoi Salam of the Khabal La Lamalee, and why do I need the mission to tell me that when you give it to the Goy, and he takes the responsibility and takes half the Vadas, why does that say that it's pater from the Khar? We already said that if this should face, then it's pater from the Khar. It's the Khasab that the Khaminahal, the Iqar Behem of the Israel, he's since the Iqar Behem is the Israel-Rachx plain, the goof of the mother is entirely belonging to the Israel, and the Israel owns half the Vadas, written as saying, maybe I should say a Knaas, you have to buy out the Goy and give it to the Khar. The Maas of the Khufa, the Behem of Akhwiti, because if we say your pater in that case, it might come to confuse with a regular animal, that the Goy has no Khilik in it, not in the mother or in the mother, so you're going to pater from the Khar. Which thing would the mother belongs to the Goy, and the Israel is m'cablet from the Goy, and it takes half the Vadas, there's no reason to say you're going to get confused
with the regular animal, because everybody sees that the mother belongs to the Goy, but over here, with the mother belongs to the Israel, and the Israel also has half the B'khar, that already might get confused with the case, where the Goy has no Khilik in it, and you're going to pater from the Khar, so we might think that we should say that it's chai, in this case, the Kammashan on them, we do not make that Knaas, and it remains pater. T'ranhaasam, the mother of the Shrew of Utah says, you're allowed to sell a B'khama Gasser to a Goy if it has broken limbs, as long as it's a place that we're not Christians, that the Goy is going to be a Mizanah with the B'khama, it's fine. B'khari, Mata B'sa'a, B'khari allows you to sell a horse, the reason is because a horse does not do any malachha that is a heav'hatas. The malachha that is so small is carrying its rider, and carrying the rider is not a heav' the rider, because the rider himself is alive, so it's chai'a, it's at its mates, only shoo is a remata. Iba'ilu, uber ma'li amabiyudu, what a rebuda say to me about selling the uber to a guy. Time to review the horse on the shore of the reason where a rebuda says over there that a Shavura animal is mutha desalto gai mishum deshura, because it has broken limbs, and it's not right from a malachha, so can't do malachha and chai'a. Uber nami shavura,
so uber also is considered broke when it comes to malachha, because it can't work, it's not yet born, so it would also be mutha. Aido ma' shura laa vahine orche, bia shura, that's not typical, and since it's not typical, that's something that's novel, no one's going to confuse it and be matter selling a regular healthy animal, I will uber kiiv in the hyno orche, but a fetus that's certainly normal, every animal starts off as a fetus, a lavish ever, it's not considered shover, and it's also to sell, because you might confuse it and be matter the mechira of an animal that is right from a malachha and chai'a. It's Toshima, Ar michna vahamehra laa, if you sell the uber to a guy, I will be sure to say, even though it's not mutha, will I probably be ridden or you see a view to the trees, that it's also to sell the uber to the guy, so I can wear a little tameh, you're there being meda'ic from what the emishna omitted, hameh start to fly, hameh kabu mi mechav, a noisla vikabalo, the laikatani over there, it doesn't say a view to his mechai, even though all three cases, the reason why the mechisa's pothre is, because there's a chupfis of the guy, either in the mother or in the uber, the chennamida, the poly, you're gonna say, they're viewed as does not argue, the gomars are gonna bring a brice in a moment, that says, there are view to does argue, alipala, it must be their view to argue, is that all three cases of chupfis,
he holds you chai'a, for laikatani, just the mechira didn't say it, so hachennami, and say, it's no rife in the mission now. Toshima, rife from a brice, you don't even have a kabu behemem, and alipala, somebody accepts responsibility, and the re-rashin learns, this is a kosher behemem that belongs to the guy, and his chai'a is gonna split the world, the yalda, and it gives birth to a bachar, Maal and Aislai Bishavir, you evaluate that bachar, figure out its value, when I sent Khatsi to Mublakhayin, and the sora has to give half of its value to the kain, rashin points out, it does not have producers like Goof to report on them as bad, because half of it is owned by the gai, but it still has a dinner bachar, as far as the dinner of giving it to a kain, so since the sora owns half of it, he has to give his chai'a to the kain, half of its value, Vahannoslai Bachar, alipija and rashin, if it's the reverse, the year it owns an animal, and he gives it to the gai, who accepts responsibility, in exchange of getting half of the vodhas, even though that's not allowed, and presumably that means, it's not allowed to give him half of those vodhas, he's not allowed to give ownership to a gai'a,
and the behememagasa, kain'simai say, we give him a knass, he has to buy back the vodhas from the gai, since he ignored what the gha'am said, at asura bada'umab, up to 10 times its value, if the gai is only masked and disallowed back, then for 10 times its value, you have to buy back. The noisin called dhamma of the kain, and has to give all of the value of that bachar to the kain, even though here as well, it doesn't have producers like of, because the gai owns half of it, even if he buys it back, but at the time that it was born, it was owned half by the gai, so it doesn't have producers bachar, as far as being brought on his back, and really it should be the same theme as the case before, he should only be hired to give half of its value, because that's the amount that he was hiring at the time that the oro was born, he still hired to give the entire value to the kain, as he explains, it's a knass, because since he gave the animal to the gai, which is something that's not supposed to do, we give a knass, he has to give all of its value to the kain, my love of the uber, when it says that it's not allowed to sell it to the gai, it's referring to the uber, meaning he gave him an animal that's pregnant, the animal remains entirely in the russha of these roles, so he didn't do anything wrong over there, and they split the uber, the aneuryshine means that it's also to give him a chaluk in that uber,
so we see the review the hold, that it's also to sell an unborn uber to the gai, something my love of the hema, it's talking about where he gave an animal to the gai, and the gai is going to fatten it up, and the gai is going to take a chaluk in the animal itself, and therefore the aneuryshine is going under the hema, not under the uber, Fretma of Hadam of Tani, Dama of his lush and zahre going under the uber, not under the hema, which is lush in the cave, which is say Damaehah, it's a knass, so we could say Damaehah, referring to the mother's value, Fretma of Anoisin, Kabab of the Kain Tani, but the bhrasa says, he gives all its value to the kain, we behemoth for discussing the mother, kain, Maehvedite, what is the kain, if we do with the mother? Clearly it's referring to the uber, and the aneuryshine is going under the uber, so we see that it's the hold, that you're not allowed to sell the uber to a gai. Zahrema of Hadam of his skin, it's going to be a yaw of the hema, I brought to the potouma, he gives the gai a pregnant animal to fatten up that animal, and that gai is going to take half of the improvements, both in the mother and in the blood, to me, he gives the kansin and lay of hema, since anyhow, we're giving him a knaas under the hema, because he transferred some ownership of that mother to the gai,
he's going to take a khaylik in the pitoum, and therefore he has to buy that part back from the gai, kansin and lay out the uber, so we throw in the knaas under the uber as well, but if you just sold the uber to the gai, perhaps you're not giving knaas, because there's nothing wrong, there's no raya, Amir Vashitashamah, the final raya, the maatrabashwura, the beauty says, you're allowed to sell an animal to gai, if that animal has broken limbs from the dasha, then you're going to get a knaas, and this price, he says the reason, the reason is because it cannot get better, and therefore it cannot do malaqa'an chawas, so there's no concern that you're being mafghia, you're removing it from the dasha, because it's not going to work, make it yik, when you're going to get a knaas, but if that animal with broken limbs could get better, then the beauty would agree that it's also the celik, because now it could do malaqa'an chawas, perhaps not today, but in the future, it will be able to do malaqa'an, therefore it will be the says it's also, the uber, now making yala, and uber, and uber, and we'll get better, because the uber will eventually be born, and go up and be able to do the work. Shimami, you know, as the clarifier, the beauty holds that it's also the cel and over to a guy. The iqadamastinwa Amasisan, some teach all of this directly on the mission, not an independent shayla. I'm going to go away,
the Amisha says, if you sell the uber of a donkey to a guy, Afubishan or shayla, even though it's not a lot, let me see some of the beauty, let us suggest, the mission is not a beauty, because the Amisha says, that it's also the cel over to the guy, the knaas, the Amisha says, the uber of a donkey, the Amisha says, you are allowed to sell, an animal that has broken limbs to a guy, and an uber is like a shura, because it's not right from a lach. It's like, when I feel the tamer of you, you can say, I'm a shura, the reason why you're a shura is a mother to sell to a guy, that's not typical, so no one's going to confuse it, you're not going to come to be a ma'atai or a regga in the ma'hira of the healthy animal. Uber, a high-new uber is supposed to be an unborn fetus, that is normal, and therefore it's not considered like a shava, and it is also, there's no raya. Toshamai, a shura, a regga in the ma'hira, and it's going to split the vadas, and the yalda, and it goes to a regga in the ma'hira, and I say, you evaluate that regga at the end of the ma'hira, and it's going to give half of its value to a guy, and I say, if he gives his animal to a guy to take care of it, alpha-peach-ener-shai, he was not allowed to do that, and again, we'll see what it means in a regga in the ma'hira, kinsan-oisai, a desuhr-vidama, we knaasam to buy it back
up to ten times its value, a regga in the ma'hira, and he says, it means he was allowed to give half of that over to the guy, you see, they are allowed to sell the over to a guy to contribute there, and then we're going, I'm talking about where he gave the behavior to fatten up, and the guy is taking the portion into the behavior itself, giving the over, perhaps it's fine, for example, if I give them a dumb up, the tonne eats a lot of shums off, they're going on the over, so after we're going to need them out, they're going on the mother, if I'm not saying, they're going on the mother, but it says, give all of its value to the guy, and we behave like a knaa, we're discussing the mother animal, what does the knaa do with the mother animal, clearly it's going on the over, and it's the right, that it's also the cell that over, everything we're going to do, we're going to do our behavior, we're going to do the same thing as before, it's talking where we gave a pregnant animal to fatten it up, and the guys are going to take half of the improvements, both the mother and the mother, and in the vloggers, then we could consume and lay our behavior once we're knaising it, for giving him a portion of the behavior, which he certainly cannot do, he has to buy that part back, consume and lay over, so we throw in the knaas on the over as well, but if he was just selling them the over, perhaps that would be mutter, there would be no knaas, I'm revanchi, I'm not sure if they should eat them with this wrap, or if he allows you to sell an animal with broken limbs to a gauy,
because they can't get better, and cannot do work on shop, it's how you're going to the strap is also, but if it could get better, it would be also to sell. The high nami kiya khle strap is dummy, and the over is also like an animal that could get better, because eventually it will be born to be able to work, Shemami no Eziraya, that it's also, if you do agree, you cannot sell an over to a gauy, and the mission that says it, it's also a kuch tim with the reviewer. Yibongi bumakhir behimme ubreha mai, if you sell an animal to a gauy, for the future of lohdes, what's the halakhah? The animal that the astrologer owns is not yet pregnant, and he sells to the gauy, the rights of the lohdes, that will come in the future. The behemme itself is not selling temeruh, what's the halakhah? Do we give him a knass and require him to buy back that squs of those future ubrin because he sold the behemme to the gauy or not? The boy that we can cut the shayl and rebeater who's matri to sell the shruh to a gauy, the boy that born him, he can cut the shayl and rebeater who in misakas are where there are argonabudah and they ask her to sell any behemme to a gauy, even a shruh. The boy that we can cut the shayl and rebeater who in misakas are the hlufa. The boy that was only matri to sell the shruh to a gauy, because he's not going to confuse that
and come to be matri to the mithira of a regular healthy animal. I will shlame him, but selling a healthy animal for its fetuses is the asi of the hlufa. That certainly you could come to confuse and come to be matri to selling the animal itself to a gauy, or say the dhitsa of the squs, or idoma, when my shruh, the posqamine, and madah, a shruh animal, where that squs is completely disconnected from the astrologer selling it. It's a complete sale, and still it's matri. The kalsh can't slame on the lay posqamine. For sure, selling a healthy animal for its fetuses, where he's not disconnected, because he's keeping the mother animal for himself. And Drashi, if the problem is that he's selling the urin, that's not a problem, because right now it's not pregnant. So he's really not selling anything to him at all. When eventually the future becomes pregnant, those fetuses are coming to being in the roshus of the gauy ready. He's not really doing any problem with mithira. The abar-bana, we could also call him the abar-bana. I can look at Asri Abar-bana, a little bit shruh of the posqamine. They're one or only Asri to sell an animal with broken limbs to a gauy, because he's completely disconnected from it. It's a complete mithira. And you're going to come to be matri, a healthy animal. I will slame on the lay posqamine, but selling a healthy animal for its fetuses,
where he's not disconnected, because he's still on the animal. And the mithira of the urin is not really a mithira, because they're not here yet. That's mutt-er. I don't want to mash shruh at the lay posqamine. I see the shruh-fei-asri, I see the mother shruh, where he's not going to come to confuse it with other animals. Because this one has broken limbs. It's very clear that it's different than a regular animal. Still don't want to say it's also the salt of a gauy. The college can't slame with the Asri to the chlufa. For sure, a healthy animal selling it for its fetuses, where you could come to confuse it and come to be matri, of complete mithira of a regular healthy animal, that for sure is also. In fact, the more of a time of the aban and mishamhachihu, is the reason why they're aban and say that you cannot sell a shruh to a gauy. For this, meaning it's the reason that you're going to come to be matri-fei with a regular healthy animal, and be matri of a regular animal, that now we have to clear, if a behemoth, luke bral, you're also going to be matri-fei not like a shruh. But the writer says, I'm going to give birth to a shruh to a gauy. But hello, you're marbine, hello, you're veiladas. The gauy is going to make the shruh with a zahar, and it's going to give birth. I'm going to be shruh, it's very clear that their aban is concerned is not the animal itself.
It's for the fetus that it's going to have. And their aban will also hold that it's also the salt of a gauy, a behemoth. For its fetuses, because it's clear, the reason why their aban and say that a shruh is also is because of what will be born after it. So selling an animal for its fetuses to a gauy is the same problem. The dr. Mahakya Kambili, this is what their aban are saying to you either. The time of the dawn, the reason why we said it's also the salt of a shruh, is because you might come to confuse it and be matri-the sale of a regular animal. And that's why we are forced to have this clear. If selling a behemoth for its future fetuses is also going to come to confuse it with a regular mchira, or perhaps not because you're not disconnected from it. And the at my time, Asharis, why are you matri-the salt of a shruh to a gauy, which means that any chai will disappear. Because since it cannot get better, it's not right from Allah. It's like you sold her for the purpose of shri-the, or not to be khayshish that people are going to get confused, because somebody sees it, or know that he didn't sell it for anything other than the purpose of shri-the, and he's not going to come to sell a behemoth, not for the purpose of shri-the. The halaym are being ala-veilethis, so factor aban and to review the, but the gauy is going to make that shruh with a zafr,
it's going to give birth, or even the marbine ala-veilethis, and since that animal with broken limbs, although it cannot work, but it is good for having lo-des, mash ala-veilethis, the gauy is going to keep it around for the purpose of producing lo-des, and if a person sees it sitting by the gauy's house after a year or two, it's going to think that you're allowed to sell a behemoth ala-veilethis, even if he doesn't plan to shakht it. Varma-lehu, the kisha-tailed, and it would be the response back to that bottom, when it gives birth, meaning it's not going to happen, to let me kabehla-zahr, because an animal with broken limbs is not going to receive that zahr, it's not going to make. So there's no raiy from this brijsa, ta shama-a, raiy from Ramishna. This is a le-baka-balla, a year it gives a gauy, his animal to accept responsibility to take care of it, and he's going to split the vadas with him, which is essentially the same thing as selling an animal for its future fetuses, because over here the gauy is not taking anything other than achay-lek in the vadas. So it's just like, Maikh-re behem-a-lehu-brijsa, the like-atani-a-ve-brijsa, and the mishat didn't say, even though it's not allowed, you see, that it's mutte. The ta-meikh, you're being medicted from the fact that the mishat didn't say that it's not allowed, and the mishat of the vadas, you become a partner with the gauy, the like-atani doesn't say you're not allowed to do that.
Hakhina-mi-der-eshayin, the ta-meikh-der, it's mutte to become a partner with the gauy, Bama-a-vood-ashmouh, as-sala-adam-shayyasi shutf-as-sama-a-ve-gachav-um. It's as if a person to become a partner with the gauy, shami-escha-adash-woa, because perhaps through that partnership, the gauy is going to be high to swear to you, venish-balla-i-be-shem-a-ve-brijsa-chav-um-shlai is going to swear to you, veny-be-shem-a-ve-diz-ar-vat-ah-um-r-d-her-sa-z-n-par-sh-z-m-sh-bat-um-d-lo-y-sh-sama-a-pe-chah. The name of the vadasar-shin-a-pe-h-h-d-r-you-you cannot cause the name of the vadasar-t-be-sa-a-e-e-le-t-ah-d-ah-m-chir-a. El-ot-tah-d-um-khir-a, the mishat-sa-a-ad-ya-na-l-ad-ah-du-it-by-d-m-khir-a,
you may not sell a behemah for its obrunn. Zakh-t-t-g-w-w-l-o-e-a-o-b-r, when it says to give a k-n-a-s, that's talking about where the fetus was already in existence. He sold the fetus that's already in that pregnant animal, and he sold them half of it. That's a pho-m-khir-a. It's not future obrunn that aren't here yet, it's not really a m-khir-a. That's a m-khir-g-m-r-a-on that existing obrunn. But an obrunn that's not yet here, perhaps that's fine. They cannot be not proved to you that the k-n-a-s of the b-rice is referring to the obrunn. The tani-kun-tsun-a-sa-a-d-a-sar-a-b-d-d-m-ov, and the wa-ith-m-over-an-r-sh-e-d-a-sh-a-s says, it must be that r-sh-e-e-d-a-sh-e-even had this gear-something-m-ar. The b-rice-m-tani-s-a-d-n-y is a v-n-a-s-in-c-l-d-m-ov-l-k-n-n-y, you're giving all of its value to the k-n-sh-m-a-na-z-a-rya, that it's going on the u-b-r-because it was going on the b-a-ma- why is the k-n-getting the b-a-ma? Clearly, it's going on the u-b-r- and the reason why we're giving him a k-n-a-S is to buy back that u-b-r-is, because he's sold the k-n-a-s-u-o-o-r, But if he sold him a behemoth for its future over, that remains in the bible if jitta, whether that's mutated to sell to the guy you're not, and we'll pause. There, so today we learned that according to the Rabbaron, if a guy has a shoft face in
either the mother or the over, it's putter from the car, or interview that's chive from the car. Its ulcer to sell a behemoth to a guy, it's also ulcer to sell an existing over of his animal that's pregnant to a guy. According to the view that it's mutated to sell a shwur to a guy, but according to the Rabbaron the shwur is also ulcer, and finally, it's in the bible if jitta, if it's mutated to sell a behemoth to a guy for its future over and or not.
More episodes
