About this episode
More on the craftspeople and the sharecroppers -- where they don't have the rights to the presumption of ownership, but their sons would. Whereas if the father's "profession" is robbery, the right to the presumption of ownership only kicks in for the grandson, not the son. Why the distinction? Also, all of the categories of people who can't establish a chazakah can still bring other means of proof to claim (and acquire) property -- except for a robber or thief. Plus, when even a robber or a thief has recourse...
Get every episode summarized
Each time Talking Talmud publishes, we email you a written briefing from the transcript — the topics, who appeared, and any specific claims, with the ad reads skipped.
Email me new episodesFree for 3 shows. No card needed.
No transcript yet
This episode has not been transcribed. Request it and it moves to the front of the queue.
More episodes
