About this episode
More on the baraita, with a shift in explanation - when there's a claimant against movable property, there's no real concern of bias on the part of the creditor. Note the explicit difference - most of the time - between land a movable property. Also: the "apotiki" lien, which complicates the given that movable property won't be getting a lien on it, as indeed it can (when attached to property).
Get every episode summarized
Each time Talking Talmud publishes, we email you a written briefing from the transcript — the topics, who appeared, and any specific claims, with the ad reads skipped.
Email me new episodesFree for 3 shows. No card needed.
No transcript yet
This episode has not been transcribed. Request it and it moves to the front of the queue.
More episodes
