
About this episode
In a very unusual one-on-one--make that one-on-two--Harry sits down with Penn law professor Kate Shaw and Pennsylvania congresswoman Mary Gay Scanlon to discuss the recent hearing in Congress at which Professor Shaw testified and Congresswoman Scanlon posed questions for the minority. The hearing was a tendentious and contrived set piece directed by Republican Congressman Jim Jordan with the clear goal of supporting the Trump administration's claim that federal judges such as Jeb Boasberg are improperly enjoining administration action. From their respective vantage points Professor Shaw and Congresswoman Scanlon explain the rules of the road about how to counter false claims about the constitution and the role of judges in it. Then with general discussion of ways in which the minority can be effective in the sharply constrained roles that the system forwards them.
See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
Get every episode summarized
Each time Talking Feds publishes, we email you a written briefing from the transcript — the topics, who appeared, and any specific claims, with the ad reads skipped.
Email me new episodesFree for 3 shows. No card needed.
Hosts & guests
No transcript yet
This episode has not been transcribed. Request it and it moves to the front of the queue.
More episodes
More from Talking Feds

Donald Trump's Quest for Eternal Life
Talking Feds
Sep 10, 202657:01completed

Molly Mashup: “Trump Makes Nixon Look Like Lincoln”
Talking Feds
Sep 7, 202626:13pending

Democrats’ Path to Beating Trump
Talking Feds
Sep 3, 202657:49pending

Contempt, Crime, and Chaos: Trump's DOJ from a Judge's Eyes
Talking Feds
Aug 31, 202637:39pending