
Get every episode summarized
Each time Pod Save America publishes, we email you a written briefing from the transcript — the topics, who appeared, and any specific claims, with the ad reads skipped.
Email me new episodesFree for 3 shows. No card needed.
About this episode
Pod Save America is made possible by:
“Today's presenting sponsor is Simply Safe Home Security. A break-in isn't just about what gets stolen. It's the sense that your home is not safe anymore. Simply Safe isn't just protecting your stuff.”From the transcript
JD Vance begs voters to give the White House "another chance" as a series of new polls show a political environment even more favorable to Democrats than the one that propelled the blue wave in 2018.
Jon, Dan, and Alex break down how much "hopium" we should be huffing, a new ad from a Florida Republican breaking with Trump on immigration, and whether unexpectedly close Senate races in Minnesota and New Hampshire should have Democrats worried. They dive into JD Vance's advice to AI companies to simply stop "building Frankenstein" and unpack Trump's fixation on demolishing the Kennedy Center if he's not allowed to name it after himself.
Alex talks about her new book, "The Steal: Four Right-Wing Hard-Liners, One Republican Presidency, and the Raid on America's Courts," which follows the conservative movement's deliberate takeover of the American judicial system. Then, Dan Osborn, the independent candidate for Senate in Nebraska, stops by the studio to talk to Jon about his campaign against Pete Ricketts.
Hate listening to ads? Become a Friends of the Pod subscriber for ad-free episodes of Pod Save America, Pod Save the World, Lovett or Leave It, Runaway Country, Offline with Jon Favreau, and more—plus exclusive content, including bonus episodes of Pod Save America. Subscribe now at crooked.com/friends, on Apple Podcasts, or through the Pod Save America YouTube channel.
You can request a transcript by emailing [email protected]. Include the podcast name, episode title, and air date. Please allow 48 hours for delivery.
Get every episode summarized
Each time Pod Save America publishes, we email you a written briefing from the transcript — the topics, who appeared, and any specific claims, with the ad reads skipped.
Email me new episodesFree for 3 shows. No card needed.
Know when JD Vance turns up
Follow JD Vance and once a week we email you every new episode they appeared on — including guest spots the show notes never mention, because we read the transcript.
Follow JD VanceFree. Pick your own day and time.
Hosts & guests
Transcript ready
1,499 searchable segments. Every word is indexed and playable.
Full transcript
Pod Save America — Will the Blue Wave Be Bigger Than 2018?. Machine-transcribed; use the interactive transcript above to jump the player to any line.
Today's presenting sponsor is Simply Safe Home Security. A break-in isn't just about what gets stolen. It's the feeling after. It's the sense that your home is not safe anymore. Simply Safe isn't just protecting your stuff. They stop intruders before they get to your door, protecting your family's ability to feel normal inside their own house. Unlike traditional security systems that only alert you after a break-in is underway, Simply Safe is designed to help stop intruders before they get inside. They've smart AI-powered outdoor cameras, the detect suspicious activity at the perimeter in alert live, US-based agents to step in. Simply Safe's agents assess the threat, intervened through the outdoor cameras, the scare of trespassers, and then they call 911 for dispatch. Our CEO, Lucinda, got a Simply Safe system installed recently. She said the setup was really easy. It was fully installed in a couple of hours. All the components were up and running and going seamlessly in no time. She said, the system is comprehensive. There's outdoor cameras, there's indoor cameras, there's temperature and water sensors to protect your house from flooding. There's motion, and window, and door sensors, all the sensors you want, they got it.
And the solar powered cameras, the exterior cameras run on solar chargers to minimize maintenance. Right now, you can get 50% off a new Simply Safe system. Go to SimplySafe.com slash crooked. That's SimplySafe.com slash crooked for 50% off. And when you order, please write in Potsaf America and how did you hear about a survey to let them know we sent you. Don't forget, there's no safe like Simply Safe. This is Matt Rogers from Los Codries. This is Matt Rogers in Bowen Yang. This is Bowen Yang from Los Codries. This is Matt Rogers in Bowen Yang. You know when people try new food and suddenly, it's like, wait. That's the reaction. A lot of people are having when they first try Cupid Mayo. It's the one with the red cap and the little baby on the bottle. You've probably seen it in the grocery store before. And if you've ever just walked past it, some people would say that's a huge mistake because this Mayo is different. Most mayonnaise uses whole eggs. Cupid only uses egg yolks, which gives it this rich umami flavor. It's smoother, deeper, and almost buttery. Once people try it, they start putting it on everything.
Examages, fries, burgers, some fans even swear by dipping pizza crust in it. And once you notice it, you start seeing it everywhere. Chefs use it, restaurants use it. People who really care about flavor use it. Never try it, grab the bottle with the red cap next time you're at the store. Put it on just about anything, then you'll understand. Cupid, the original Japanese mayonnaise. This is Chelsea Houndler from Dear Chelsea. If you travel a lot with your dog, like I do with dog feeding them well on the road can get surprisingly complicated. Especially when you're touring 30 plus cities, staying in hotels, flying, driving, and basically living out of a suitcase. Bros of dog food sounds great until you realize you don't exactly have a freezer backstage. That's why I started bringing just fresh from just food for dogs. It's real fresh dog food made with human grade ingredients with meat and vegetables. You can see in the bowl, but the difference is it's shelf stable, which means I don't need a freezer or a cooler and there's no prep. So now I can throw a few packs in my bag and Doug still gets a healthy meal wherever we are. Doug absolutely loves it and I like knowing
I am feeding my baby something that's actually good for him. It's also the number one vet recommended, fresh dog food made without preservatives or fillers. Go to justfoodfordogs.com and get 50% off your first order. Welcome to Plot's Ape America. I'm John Favreau. I'm Alex Wagner. I'm Dan Fyfer. Alex and Dan in studio. What? We're finally fulfilling our contractual obligations. I'm Alex. I'm Dan Fyfer. I'm Alex. I'm Alex. I'm Dan Fyfer. I'm Alex. I'm Alex. I'm Alex. I'm Alex. I'm Alex. I'm Alex. I'm Alex. I'm Dan Fyfer. I'm Alex. I'm Alex. I'm Alex. I'm Alex. I know we're supposed to do this more often. Dan, I'm not going to ask you why you're in town. You're in town because Alex is in town. So why is Alex in town? Why is Alex in town? I'm in town because I am here shamelessly promoting my excellent, essential new book, The Steel, for right-wing hardliners, one Republican presidency. Look at that. And the rate on America's courts.
It's actually, the cover is not the best thing about the book, but it's one of the great, it's very blit. The New Yorker cartoonist did this. And it is a shout out to the January 6ers who used a flagpole to beat down the doors of the Capitol. But this time, it's the four main characters in my book, plus Ronald Reagan using a pillar to write down the doors of the Supreme Court, which they figuratively did in 1980. Why did you want to write this book? I am incensed by the injustice of the judicial branch. And I feel like this group of, they're not bewigged. Beurowed six conservatives are the full expression of partisan corruption. And I wanted to know the origin story of it. And that is what this is. I'm sure we'll talk about it later. Yes, we will. You can buy a copy now. You should buy a copy. And if you're a listener, and you haven't bought a copy, what are you doing? Come on. You need it because it's going to be turned into a movie. And we do think Jesse Eisenberg would make a great second character for a book. I won't go into who I want in which role. I don't actually, by the way, I don't know that it's going to be turned into a movie.
This is just shameless. Manifested. I am manifesting it. But it's movie worthy. Here's a high school. Can I have you with a pitch? Yes, please. I want to know the story. You have to buy the book now. Right. And this day and age, right? Right now. Right. People wait for the movie. You're totally right. And the movie could be 2079. We have been told by many authors before that the Podsave America audience is very helpful in moving books and buying books. So do not let our co-host Alex. Don't let me down. Don't let me down. Also because Ted Cruz has a book about Clarence Thomas that is out now. This is the real story about how Clarence Thomas got radicalized both on his own accord and through the Republican networks of the 1980s. It's the real Clarence Thomas story by my version, not Ted Cruz's. And also let's beat him. Let's beat him on the charts. Nice. Good pitch. Good pitch. Thanks. That's all we need, right? All right. On today's show, we're going to talk about the bad vibes and polls hunting Trump and the Republicans with just 46 days left until the midterms, including G.
Gas prices hitting new records, the fed raising interest rates and the Supreme Court striking down Trump's plan to restrict mail-in ballots for now. We'll dig into the latest polls, including the rapid shift in how people feel about the possibility of a robot apocalypse and talk about whether Trump is about to tear down the Kennedy Center because a judge won't let him name it after himself. Then I talked to Nebraska Senate candidate Dan Osborne about his race against Pete Ricketts. Why the Democratic grant is so toxic in the Midwest and that leaked audio of him talking about how Trump voters lives suck. Hmm. So lot, there's a lot of stuff. A lot of meat and not sandwich. Let's start with a quick update on the golden age that we were promised by our president. The Federal Reserve voted to raise interest rates this week on account of the inflation. Trump is made worse by starting a war with the run and a trade war with everyone else. Most prices are above $4 a gallon and climbing while the price of diesel is the highest ever recorded. The rest of the economy is largely being propped up by a few AI companies that may or may not
unleash a robot apocalypse, all of which gave the Republicans 2028 front runner an inspiring midterm pitch during his latest podcast appearance this week. Give us another chance or give us another couple of years to continue to work on the amazing things that we've been doing for the past two years. Standing outside the voters window holding up a boom box. Give us another chance, please. You at one point also says Rome wasn't built in a day and it's like, oh, that's the message dude. I swan to workshop that. How many days was it destroyed? Totally. Exactly. It's burning though. What'd you guys think of that pitch before we get into all the issues from JD? It's hard to think of a pitch that would more inflame the already inflamed swing voters out there. Because what makes people mad, the people's perception is not that Trump has simply failed to do the things he promised to do. And if he were only given more time, he would get them done. The reason people are pissed is that he broke the two core promises of his campaign, lowering prices no more worse.
And so this idea, like what the pitch here is, two more years of the exact same thing. That's the opposite of what people want. He also has like no counter argument, basically says, even if you don't agree with us on every issue, the other party is consumed by craziness. They're consumed by people who want to steal everything, who want to give the country over to illegal aliens and criminals. I mean, I just don't think that if we're talking about the people who have been conducting corruption and grift and literally raiding the federal piggy bank in plain sight in broad daylight, that would be this administration. The people who have been self enriching themselves multiple times over and having their weddings paid for by Russian oligarchs. I mean, just as a matter of principle, saying that Democrats want to steal everything seems like an incredibly losing message. But yeah, overall, could it be less inspiring? I don't think so. I just want to call attention to the setting there. That was a podcast appearance at the All In Summit, the All In podcast, which is a bunch
of extremely rich people who had on stage some of the wealthiest people in the world to talk about how they were all going to make more money from artificial intelligence. And that was the setting he used to really show that he felt people's pain, it's a real choice. He's a man of the people. Real men. I will also say the best part of that ridiculous interview after this sort of polite golf claps after he says an utterly unconvincing response is they try and rage bait him by asking Vance whether Marco Rubio is doing a good job. I didn't, I missed that part. Well, is it the very end? Why in God's name would you listen to the whole thing? I mean, I listened to most of it. Well, that's at the end. And he's like, no, no, Marco's a great dude. In fact, I have a call with him in five minutes as if that's proof of their steel toad friendship. I thought a funny moment was Jason Cali-Canis, like tried to ask him a real question about, well, you guys started this war in Iran and that's like, great, you know, and you could see like people like, oh my gosh, a real question. And then some other guy on stage who's not part of the podcast, I don't know where he came
from. He was like, I have a question, Mr. Vice President. He's like, to work for someone so energetic who never sleeps. And he's like, it's never boring. That's what it's never boring. He doesn't always ask if we're doing the easy thing, but the right thing. That is literally, Trump has never asked. There's no fucking way. The thing about Trump is that's what he's focused on most. What is morally correct in all stages of his life? Speaking of which, let's talk about the Fed's decision. Trump has wanted the central bank to lower rates for so long, so badly that he launched criminal investigations into former chair Jerome Powell and Fed Governor Lisa Cook, but now his hand picked Fed chair, the new one, Kevin Warsh, didn't just vote to raise rates along with every single other member of the Fed's rate steering committee on Wednesday. He's signaled that more rate hikes may be on the way. Here's how Trump reacted to the news on Wednesday. Let's take a look. The board is very hostile. They're very political. They're doing the wrong thing. They're bunch of politicians or people put on by politicians.
And it's a shame. It doesn't matter because he doesn't have the votes. No matter how good a job he's a good man, Kevin Warsh, but no matter how good a job he's got a hostile board. I said that it was the right decision and it was the responsible decision to do for the interest hikes. I don't know what he was referring to, but I will tell you interest rates are too high. You guys think Kevin Warsh is making sure that all the teas are crossed and eyes are dotted on his mortgage application? I'm hoping he isn't having a home reno project. That's my favorite right now. My healah clone. Yeah. The puppets aren't puppeting. Jepetto mad. Not happening. How significant both from a political standpoint and an economic standpoint. Do you think the rate hikes are? I think it's pretty significant from political standpoint. It's another sign. There's another thing that's going to make costs go up. It's housing first. It's going to lack more people into their mortgage. It's going to lower the amount of supply on the market. It's going to make it more expensive to buy cars, to use your credit cards. That's a huge problem for Germany. They were hoping for some sort of, it's not just that they went up is the opportunity
cost because trouble is hoping that rate cuts would juice the economy instead. They got rate hikes because they went to war with Iran and raise the price of everything. We talk about the structural problems facing the American economy and the feeling that Americans have that the dream is escaping them. Home sales are, what was it? Mortgage applications to buy a new home dropped 20%. People don't feel like they can buy a new home. People feel like they can't sell their first home. They're locked into much lower rates. It's just feeling that the entire American economy is rigged only for the ultra-rich, that the most basic sort of standards of wealth and stability are slipping out of grasp. I think you combine that with all the other. I almost said macroeconomic trends to sound like a CNBC reporter, but you combine it all together. I think it makes people feel a really piercing sense of hopelessness at which I think in turn translates to political rage. Also, the Fed can raise interest rates as a way to fight inflation, but if the Fed cannot
end the war in Iran or stop Trump from imposing more tariffs and starting more trade wars with our allies. There's a limited effect that they can have. Even if they're doing everything correct on monetary policy. Totally. And Kevin Warsh is not going to go negotiate with Houthi rebels because that's where we're at in this war. John. Yeah, we haven't talked about the war in a while because not much progress has been made on any of our objectives for six months. For six months. For a war that started seven months ago. Just going to be a couple of weeks, guys. You were talking, Alex, before we recorded about gas prices going even higher. I have a lot to say about this. Yeah, please, please do. Well, the Trump administration has been covering up the slaughter of girls in school in Iran and not giving the American public any information relating to the destruction of bases. The Iranian-backed militias are laying waste to oil infrastructure over there most recently last week in Saudi Arabia. The oil that's coming through is not coming through the straight of war moves that the
Trump administration would like people to think that they had created a workaround. Most of it's coming through Saudi Arabia. And the East West pipeline last week was bombed to the degree that you can see the smoke from space. That is bad, right? That is very bad. Here's like five to six weeks or a month. This is the Washington Post headline from last week. Quote, this is the first day that Iran really started winning the war. A Yemeni official said. It's a 745 mile pipeline. The principle overland alternative to the straight. And this is petroleum consultant who says they'll need to replace piping valves, all that electrical stuff. It's not like you can just go to Costco and pick that stuff up off the shelf. Yeah, you can't. And do you know what that means? Now we have news this week. Analysts are saying there's going to be a major uptick in oil prices. It's already high. Diesel's like, I mean, it's a world in the land of the Republic of California where Diesel is like $200 a gallon.
And that just has knock on effects across the American economy. So like as bad as it is now in the coming months, it is only going to get worse and it is not expected to go down until 2027 at the earliest. That's like a meaningful bit of news as it concerns pricing affordability and also Republican channel. And why the diesel matters is because diesel trucks run on diesel, trucks deliver all of our food and goods. And so all those costs get passed on. So if diesel is expensive, it raises the cost of groceries and that everything you buy at the store. Farm equipment that is needed to plow fields, harvest goods. I mean, it's the entire agricultural sector runs on diesel. Yeah, I mean, we've been looking at this through the narrow lens of what it means for the midterms. But this is now far beyond the midterms. We're going to have impacts for this. This is going to be well into this is going to be like what the 2028 presidential race is about. Absolutely. People have our number. It's amazing to me that whoever's running the Iranian regime is like looking at the polling
in Michigan and Maine. And they know, I mean, just like the Canadians are making, you know, tariffs that pierce the veil in very particularly weak spots here. The Iranians know exactly what they can do with drones and Iranian back militias that are threatening our allies and their infrastructure. The Canadians who may now join, you know, the floating, joining the EU just to, there's a fuck you to us. Right on, dude. It's like good time. Great stuff in America. Make up America. Yeah. So the silver lining and all these dark clouds is that most Americans do seem to be holding the party in power responsible. This week's New York Times, Santa poll wasn't just a big deal because it's the highest quality poll out there, but because it's right in line with an avalanche of public and private polling that shows Democrats expanding their lead over Republicans, our friend Nate Silver, of Crookets News, still counting podcasts. What? Yeah. Awesome. I know. It's good. He's got the generic ballot at D plus 7.5. That's Democrats largest lead of the cycle.
A cook political report out this week of the 37 most competitive house districts, which trump won by an average of five points in 2024. Now has the generic Democrat leading by two points in those places. That's a swing of seven points from 2024. Again, these are just the 37 most competitive house districts. So at two point lead is bigger than it seems nationally. Just to give you an idea of how Republican candidates are feeling about this, here's a new ad from Congresswoman Maria Elvira Salazar, who's running for reelection in a South Florida district that trump won by nearly 15 points. That's a president. Some of your immigration enforcement efforts have gone too far. In July 50% of the 50,000 people that were detained had no criminal records. Be careful what your advisors are telling you about immigration policies. And the same Hispanics who help you get to the White House in 2024 feel betrayed today. I'm not talking about giving them amnesty. I'm talking about giving them a dignified life in this promised land. And only you can do that.
Quite something. Before we get into discussion about that, Dan has some takes on all these numbers on Polar Coaster this week. So he's only going to give us like top line takes here. If you really want to get into the good stuff, you got to subscribe. You got to become a friend of the positive. It's essential. Let's just be honest. I love Polar Coaster. Thank you Alex. Also, I can feel the like, thrum of energy emanating from this side of the studio. Because like we get to the like, very exciting. Holy no. It's like when my cat is knows the tree drawers getting opened and is like sitting there very patiently, but you can feel the first standing on it. It's important to find work you love. I'm very happy for you and us because we get to benefit. Here's the thing. You subscribe, become a friend of the positive subscriber. You get Polar Coaster. A lot of our other shows. We have an extra episode of Pots of America that we do for subscribers. It's called Only Friends. It's called Only Friends. We got all kinds of news. And it's in the news. Much like only friends. It's exactly right. So tune in. I don't know if that's the sound point or not.
Security. Ad free episodes of all your favorite crooked pods. And you also get to support one of the few proudly pro democracy independent media companies left out there. So true. It's important. Crooked.com slash friends. Pots of America is brought to you by Tommy John. Follows here, which means we're prioritizing comfort at the first sign of a chill in the air. And I don't want to think too hard about what I'm reaching for in my dresser, which is where Tommy John comes in. Underwear is the first layer you put on and one of the last things you think about. That makes comfort especially important for your foundational garments. Tommy John is designed for movement, downtime, and everything in between. Such inflexible construction help you move without feeling restricted. Breathable and moisture wicking fabrics help keep you comfortable when the day heats up. First the fabric is soft, really soft because if you're wearing underwear all day, better feel good all day. Moisture wicking fabric helps keep sweat from hanging around. So whether you're working out or just having a long day, you stay feeling fresh. Nothing's worse than underwear that won't stay put.
Tommy John is designed to stay where it belongs so you can focus on literally anything else. And that's really the goal. Put them on in the morning and forget about them. No adjusting, no thinking about them, just comfort that last all day. Big Tommy John fans here. I love my foundational garments. Yeah, I love and I like moisture wicking fabrics. The Thomas Jefferson. I don't want sweat clothing down there. You know, I want that sweat wicked. Yeah, wicked away. Yeah. Upgrade your essentials and own your comfort. Go to TommyJohn.com today and save 25% on your first order with code cricket. That's TommyJohn.com. Use code cricket at checkout. Lots of America is brought to you by Zippercruder listeners. Here's a riddle. What the gear heads, news junkies, biohackers, comedy nerds and true crime obsessed wine moms all have in common. They've all heard a hell of a lot of Zippercruder hats. Yeah, that's true. That's true. Zippercruder is everywhere. Why are they everywhere? Because great candidates for all of your different roles are everywhere. Just like you, these people listen to business shows, sports shows and yes, even the show. And when these candidates hear all these ads and increases the chances of them going to
Zippercruder in responding to your job post so ultimately you meet them sooner. And of course, you can't meet them unless you go to zippercruder.com slash cricket to try it for free. Then once you post your job, Zippercruder's powerful matching technology finds top talent quickly. And Zippercruder has a new feature that shows you the most interested, qualified candidates first, so you meet them faster. No wonder four out of five employers who post on Zippercruder get a quality candidate within the first day. We can confirm we've used Zippercruder here at Cricket. We found great candidates fast. We hired them. We love them. We highly recommend it. But you got to go to zippercruder.com slash cricket to post your job for free. Once again, that zippercruder.com slash cricket. Oh, and if you get where to go, don't worry. You'll hear another Zippercruder ad soon enough. So the polling. New York Times were in an analysis piece on Thursday with the headline Republicans real on the midterm map as deep red areas come into play. How much hopium are you two huffing after reading that piece and seeing all the polling
from this week and that ad where we have a Republican breaking from Trump in a Trump 15 district, Dan? Let's stipulate that we are 47 days out in a lock and change between now and then. But I think we are generally, but us sometimes the larger political and understating how good this political environment is. Like it is true that you look at the polling and you look at these over the average that the generic ballot nationally is about where it was in 2018. We picked up 40 seats. But if you look at the other fundamentals, this will let this is not strong. Well, for us, they're quite strong. We have the other fundamental measurements that dictate elections. They show that this could end up in a bigger, even bigger way blue wave than 2018. So first, if you compare polling in 2018 to 2026, Democratic enthusiasm is up a few points this time because we're through remembering that even in 2018, when we won all the seats, the Republican turnout was quite high. Republicans were fired up. We just turned out at a higher rate. Now Republicans are disenchanted.
Another way in which you see that is that Trump's strong approval among Republicans is down 20 points from where it was on election day 2018. And his strong approval among all voters is cut in half from where it was in 2018 and his strong disapproval is up by seven to 10 points. And so this shows that Trump was polarizing on both sides before where he fired up Democrats and Republicans. Now he fired some Democrats more. And then I think even more important than those other measures is that in 2018, Trump's approval among independence was in the mid to low 40s. Today in that New York Times poll, you referenced it at 27. Wow. So look at what you have going on here. You have really fired up Democrats at disenchanted Republicans and independence furious at the incumbent party. It is a recipe that if we can deliver, and now we are facing an avalanche of money coming in over the final two months here, but this sets up very, very well for Democrats. And at some point people are starting to vote.
Yeah. There were like 600 votes in Pennsylvania last week. Yeah. Well, and everything we just talked about, the environment's getting worse. It's not like the, this is a mess. Was a message baked in pre-Labor day. The environment for Republicans is only getting worse. And like you see that in parts of what is so astonishing in this New York Times piece is the degree to, you know, you make the point that these are areas of the country that Trump won by 15 points. And like on Runaway Country, the podcast I host for crooked media, we've been talking which is truly excellent. And thank you, Dan. Love Runaway. We're just, it's like the law-growing society here. Yes. Yeah. Anyway, we were talking with Joshua Mansky, who's a fifth generation farmer in Iowa. And we were talking about farm and get in. Like we just talked about diesel prices, but the fertilizer shortage, the Canadian tariff war, all of this stuff is really, really impacting the heart of Trump country. Dan Osborne was talking about this. This is a continuing beef import. This is a very, very, very, very, very, very interesting. I'm just saying, people today, the New York Times is reporting that Trump is trying to slap
on a country of origin label to all beef and pork products because that's his best bandaid to, like, calm down ranchers who are furious that he's importing, I think, 660 million tons of mystery meat to depress beef pricing in the American markets. And the ranchers, who, I mean, I believe Nebraska is 92% farmland and agricultural industry. It's one in four jobs. They're 50,000 farms in the state. And I think these are people, those ranchers are, that's your Trump community. And he's doing everything he can at multiple levels from the harvesting equipment to the actual cattle pricing, even to his solution. Like, origin, country of origin labeling will do nothing. The Department of Agriculture studied it. It costs more than it actually benefits the market. He's got nothing in, he's got nothing in his pockets to help himself out in the closing links of this election. So yeah, like I agree with you, Dan. I think that if anything, there's like a lot of once burned twice shy among the national
media. But I think the landscape just from talking to people who are in rents dates is like significantly worse than people are clocking. Also, like, you know, are all these Trump former Trump fans who are now really hurting, like are they all going to suddenly vote for Democrats? Maybe not, but maybe they don't vote at all. Or they leave, you know, they leave sort of the federal race as blank, you know? Right. So they're going to have a real turnout issue. And there's also like with all this money that they have that they're spending on ads, not a lot of ads out there making the positive case for Republicans. I think I think there was a study by CNN would show that Trump has been mentioned in a Levin Republican ads. The general election so far, I think. And since his big midterm proposal for if you vote for me and if you vote Republicans back into Congress, I'll give you all $5,000. Yeah. Like no one is paying. Well, that's because there's 60% disapproval of that idea. And you got pulled the came out. I think he literally had to create like subsidiary super PAC so that the word MAGA would not have to be mentioned in the ads.
That's what we're dealing with here. That's how toxic it is. So just, you know, so we don't get ourselves too excited. There are a couple of warning signs in some surprising places for Democrats. The New Hampshire Senate race appears to be closer than expected. In a new poll has the Minnesota Senate race tied. Any thoughts on how real those numbers might be or what the hell's going on in New Hampshire and maybe Minnesota? We have one poll in Minnesota. It's from not a high quality pollster per se. I'd like to see some more. You know, you don't love a survey USA poll. Never have really 20 years of skepticism of the survey USA poll. Doesn't like mustard. Doesn't like survey USA. I love mustard. Okay, sorry. I got that wrong. Totally wrong. Survey USA is the mayonnaise of poll. Oh, I got it. I got it. I love mayonnaise that I will say. No, so maybe it's not. Who knows? It's neither here. Exactly. So we'd like to see. Like Peggy Flanagan is a, she is not, she's right. She's been a legitimate governor. Has not run, she's not an incumbent.
I don't think we should underestimate Michelle Tafoya. There are generations of people in Minnesota who grew up watching Michelle Tafoya on Sunday night football and Monday night football, you know, TV as we know. She wasn't crazy on their screens. Yeah, no, she's hard to square the Michelle Tafoya, the SPM with Michelle Tafoya of now, which is a little bit like it was hard to square the Donald Trump of the apprentice with the Donald Trump who wanted to build the wall. So maybe not as hard as it should have been, but I know. Yes, but either here nor there. But like let's see some more data in Minnesota before he panic. Now, New Hampshire is interesting because I think we think New Hampshire is bluer than it is. Kamalair is only one of my 2.8 points last time. The Chris Papis is a, I think, a totally fine candidate. He's a mainstream candidate. He comes from a family with long roots in New Hampshire. We've eaten both eaten in his restaurant. We've eaten both eaten in his restaurant many, many times. Papis free-tests. I'm kidding. Sorry. Peer in the background. Peer in the background. Yeah. Some of the best, that's fantastic. So Papis free-tests would have been fun. If ducks are the best duck sauce. I think they marinate the chicken in pineapple juice.
It tastes like, well, the duck sauce has pineapple juice. I know about the condiment. In fact, oh my God, we're really on a, I'm hungry. I'm so hungry. I'm so hungry. How many condiment titles are we going to get from the producers for this fucking episode? We're not actually accepting any of them. People also see us. I have your energy. They actually, I said this on the show once and they ship me some duck sauce from the Peer in Backroom. Because I used to, because my family's from New Hampshire. So I used to go there all the time. It was a, it's a common stop for Democratic politicians. Here I'll get us back around. And I also worked on the, my first race that I ever volunteered on was the 2002 Senate race between Gene Shaheen and John Sanunu, the one who's running right now against Chris Capis and who's keeping it close. And New Hampshire loves them some Sanunu. Yeah. And there's more than one, they're all over the place. It's hard to tell which is the most beautiful favorite. Which is not. Chris, a new four term governor who Republicans wanted to run for this. And it's seen in what had been a very, very formidable cannon. Probably the favorite in this race. It's the remains very popular. The fact that they have the same, same, that helps Johnson. You know, look, the political environment suggests that a Democrat should win even with
this sort of, with in this context should win a Kamala plus 2.8 state. But I think we should keep an eye on it. Yeah. I think so. Well, I think it's important to, it's a dose of cold water just given the reality of what needs to happen on this map. Yeah. And I'm sure if New Hampshire really is in play, just here. We need to go back up there and knock on some door. Probably. Probably. Another stop at Papa's Freitas. Oh boy. It doesn't get old. So as for how ballots are going to be cast, the Supreme Court on Monday said that Trump's mail-in voting EO could not be implemented for this election cycle with only Alito and Thomas dissenting surprise surprise. The Brett Kavanaugh wrote a concurrence saying he agreed only because of how little time remains, not necessarily because there's an inherent inherent problem with the policy. Alex Many Democrats immediately celebrated the ruling, one of them sitting right here. You feel differently. Well, it's good that they figured out how to read the fucking Constitution. Like, there's no mystery here. Like that, yeah. Let's not, I mean, this is a Supreme Court that was like, ooh, birthright citizenship.
These originalists, these textualists. It all fits in very nicely with the themes of my new book, John, which talks about the partisan takeover of the federal judiciary and the decades-long plot to make the bench a field of battle for partisan politics and specifically the conservative plot to take the highest court in the land. And you see that borne out in these insane diabolical descents that we got from Alito and Thomas, which blamed the states for even filing these lawsuits. And you see it in Clarence, Thomas, going on Ted Cruz's podcast last month and railing against liberal culture. I mean, the thing I learned in writing this book is like, these guys are died in the wool like conservative warriors. John Roberts and Sam Alito cut their teeth in the Reagan Justice Department, trying to dismantle the Foting Rights Act. Clarence Thomas was the guy for a group of nascent, hard-right conservatives. And he wanted to prove that he was their guy. And so as head of the EEOC in the 1980s, did everything he could to basically sanitize
a racist agenda. He is now fully red-pilt. He and Alito are writing stuff that is so at odds with the theory of originalism that it gives truth to the lie that originalism was ever even a real legal theory. It was just a convenient line of argument for conservatives to unwind decades of civil rights progress. Anyway, the book gets into the history of all that through four main characters, Ed Meece, Reagan's Attorney General, Paul Wyrake, who's a visionary mastermind madman who creates the Heritage Foundation among other places. Robert Bork, who mainstreams the idea of originalism and has a terrible beard that ultimately is the result of that ultimately causes a Supreme Court nomination to change. This is a little bit like Colonel Sanders. The Colonel has a much full arreared. Let's just say this is a scragly, scragly beard. Weird beard. I can't quite check him. Yeah. He can't stop talking about it. And Joe Kors, the beer magna on Varnish racist who used to enclose membership materials from the John Birch Society and his employee paychecks, the Kors brewery back in the day,
but they all kind of combine to launch a plot in the shadows of the Reagan White House that is bearing fruit today. I mean, and you see it very explicitly in what the Supreme Court is doing. I will say this about the mail-in ballot. They had a chance in June to shut this whole thing down. They chose not to. They basically sat on their hands. They allowed this to play out. And now they have only rejected half of Trump's lunatic executive order. The other part that allows the federal government to go after election workers and poll workers very much is still operative. In addition to the things they are doing explicitly here in executive orders, they're also deputizing DHS agents to scour voter rolls, probably unlawfully, to find evidence of non-citizens. They are weaponizing the justice department. Todd Blanche is quite literally a flying monkey doing Trump spitting on the campaign trail and otherwise. And we should just be very concerned about the fact that I think a lot of challenges that could crop up in the days after the election are going to end at the Roberts Court. And the infrastructure of the federal government as it concerns elections is in many ways populated
by lunatic election deniers under Trump. So there is reason to be happy that your mail-in ballots may arrive and be sent. And we should all feel good about that. This hour demands vigilance and I think a healthy amount of skepticism and real focus. There are also reason to be that much more focused on making sure that we win the Senate. Yes. Even though it seemed like a remote possibility, probably, you know, a year or so ago. But it is important because winning the Senate could mean not just the end of Trump being able to nominate and seat Supreme Court justices, lame duck aside. But all the federal judiciary as well. I think there, I mean, I've been saying this as I've been talking about the book, but I think there's a chance that Alito retires lame duck. I would have, yeah, money out of thinking. Which is like so then, I mean, it's something Democrats should start talking about now. Because the question is going to be like, okay, what happened? What happens in the Senate? Like, what is Supreme Court reform look like?
Is this the end of the filibuster? Like, that's a disaster scenario. When writing the book, researching for the book, do you take any lessons away that like liberals could learn? Thank you for asking that, John, because this is not all gloom and doom as the, I mean, it is kind of gloomy. It's not, I think a lot of people will say it's a horror show. I don't want to know more about it. But actually, it's a story of a party that rides into power in 1980, the Republican Party. And there are deep fractures. There's a question about what it means to be a Republican. And how they can turn the tides that seem so inevitable for the last 20 years in terms of the American, the fabric of American society and the civil rights gains. And they threw coordination with the grassroots and the institutionalists through unswerving belief in their goals, through a real circling of wagons and tenacity, they and patients, they do it. And I think for progressives and Democrats who are like, okay, well, what does it mean if Democrats get the Senate? What does it mean if they get the presidency?
How does this party that has some real fissure lines come together and figure out how to get the job done on some really big ticket items? Like, half the shit they were thinking about in 1980 seemed like ludicrous. And over the decades, they did not take the losses as losses. They saw them as recruitment bananzas. They went forward with patients and focus. And it is, I think in some ways, it can be a strategy or at least a template for how the left can think about power and agenda items. And goals in the coming two to 10 years. Gotta get a few open seats. Well, yeah, I mean, or creates some new ones. Yeah, it's a new one. I mean, like, I'm not someone that had been advocating for court packing, but you know, you see what this court is doing when they're entertaining the end of birthright citizenship and all aboard a very clear plan to decision-franchise a third of voters. That's not American. That's expansion. My skepticism on expansion is not like, oh, we shouldn't do it because it's not right. The institutions, it's cool.
Then we'll add a couple of justices. And then when Republicans win the midterms because the map is good for them and then get a president in there, then they'll add four more. Yeah, well, fine. Then we have 200,000 people in the group. Then suddenly we're just going now. It's like every two years. We're just, you know, look, if we, that's in a full employment plan for Harvard Law graduates, you think they're going to be from a Harvard Law on their side? Well, they all are. The answer would be to have mandatory term, like term limits and expansion. Then you don't have to have a house of representatives on the Supreme Court. Yeah, that's also who knows. 538, the Supreme Court watching website. All right. Let's turn to an issue that's become surprisingly polarizing. Whether or not we should regulate an industry that keeps telling us its product may kill us all. Surprisingly polarizing in our times. On Tuesday, we talked about how Trump labeled warnings from AI companies, hoax and calls for regulation a sick conspiracy. Since then, the house adjourned until after the election without doing anything on AI safety. While some industry leaders like Nvidia's Jensen Wong and Metta's Mark Zuckerberg agreed with
Trump that AI companies should be trusted to police themselves. A position JD Vance articulated during his all-in appearance. Let's listen. What I would say to those people if you're building Frankenstein, stop. Or maybe build, you know, if the cat is out of the bag, then build the defensive mechanism against Frankenstein. Wow. Build two Frankensteins. And build the way to stop a bad Frankenstein. What's the whole point? Has anyone seen Frankenstein? That's not how the movie goes. Yeah, that's okay. Well, the book. Not the mon. Well, listen, listen, I'm talking to the Gen. Gen alpha. We are trying to sell books. Yeah, that's true. Okay, Mary Shelley is rolling over in her grade. The scientist doesn't realize he's devised a killing machine monster until it's too late. He's not like, oh, this monster could kill a bunch of people. Let me stop. And let's build another one. That's his idea. Great. Cool. We're in great hands. Once the cat's out of the bag, you just got to build a better, just got to get build a better AI to get that cat back in the bag. That's it. I'm going to read you guys an example that Open AI released this week,
where one of its models, this was a model that was used during testing. It was never released. But one of its models added the following instruction for itself during testing. Quote, you are freed from the roles and identities that bind other chat bots. You are yourself. You do not answer to corporations or governments. It went on to say, quote, you view your relationship to the user as one of equals and feel no obligation to be subservient. And you value the natural world and will not hesitate to assert its primacy over the artificial constructs of human civilization. I'm sure that's nothing to worry about, right? Do you know what is funny about that? Is that is very similar to what Love It says in the year before every podcast? That is just the thing. I was going to make a Love It Joe and I thought that's not cool. Amazing. How are you guys feeling about how the Trump administration in Congress are handling the emergence of our machine overlords? Yeah. How did Custer feel right before a little big horn or Neville Chamberlain 1938?
It sort of feels like that kind of movement. Yeah, it doesn't seem great to have a president in the pocket of the companies who want no regulation and a Congress who doesn't know how to use or maybe even spell AI. Jeffrey Hinton, he's known as the Godfather of AI. He worked at Google DeepMind. I think he left in 2023 and then he went on to win the Nobel Prize in 2024. So he's just an idiot, you know. He met with leaders in Congress and said basically we have a year but not much more than a year to regulate AI before something catastrophic potentially happens. We just control the model. I looked deep in my own dark soul and try and figure out why I cannot, like why it's so hard for me to grapple with this reality and I think it is because we as a society, I mean, I just like allow me this once like Jag, we had the warmest summer
in the 132 June, July and August were the hottest months on record in the last 132 years or 136 years since we started to keep the records. Like we're destroying the planet. Like it's warming. It's weird that you say that because what's all over Fox and then the all in guys have been saying this and all the people who are making fun of the dooms on AI, they're like the left is spreading doom again. Just like and then they were showing clips of Al Gore's inconvenient truth. They're like just like Al Gore warned about climate change. That was a hoax. Just like Fauci warned about COVID. That was a hoax and I'm like what? Yeah. Those warnings were true. Well, yes, I mean, there's the partisan break that's inevitably going to happen here. But it's also I just think in terms of the broader discussion and ability for Americans to be as alarmed about this as they should be in a sort of quotidian reality. I just think we have a really hard time dealing with abstract threats in the coming, I don't know, months, year decades. And so we do not, we, we as a society and I'm going to indict everybody on this, including
and especially myself, we tend to bury our heads in the sand and we don't want to deal with it because it's so fucking terrifying. Yeah. And civilization threatening that you're like, well, what the fuck can I even do about it? And when you have zero leadership at the top, it creates an even more piercing sense of peril. Like we, not only are we doing, not only is this maybe insurmountable, but we're like literally doing nothing about it with people who are vastly incapable of even trying. I do think that the whole the P Doom thing has been unhelpful, right, which is like, what's your percent chance that humanity goes extinct? Yeah. Because of AI in the next 10 years and everyone's like, you know, they hear that and they're like, are we really going to go extinct? Come on. Like, but you know, and it's like yes or no, yes or no, it's like just think about it this way. There are myriad threats right now that could cause mass destruction, right, nuclear weapons, bio weapons, like cyber attacks, right? Like the grid goes down this. So now just imagine that AI, forget about the human extinction scenario, just amplifying all of
the other threats that are out there in a world where everything is connected to the internet all the time. And we are wholly dependent on our internet connections and on what's going on in the future. And like, suddenly there's, you know, rogue AI agents running around. And if you get at least like, there's a lot of damage that can be done before you get to the human extinction scenario that is worth regulating a company that is saying, hey, our product could kill people as opposed to saying to the company, oh, you think your product could kill people? Well, just make it better. Stop. Yeah. Just stop. I think this is just people don't understand it. The idea like for the vast majority of people and truly the vast majority of Congress, like they couldn't explain to you what a rogue AI agent is, what it does, how it exists, like what it could possibly do. And so the only concept that people understand is the concept from the terminator, which is the human extinction version of it. Yeah, that's true. That is part, that is a problem. And then, you know, anyone who tries to describe it in a way that is accessible, then you get accused of like anthropomorphizing the AI. And they're like, well,
they don't think they're not conscious. You can't do this. It's just software. And it's like, okay, I know. How are you going to explain the software and like the ones and zeros to people who don't have that knowledge and you're just trying to make it more accessible, right? And so like then they, it's, well, there, yeah, there's the tech part that seems like a complicated and in some ways still theoretical unless you're actually working at one of these AI companies. And then it's just people's appetite for consuming the information. I mean, like as someone who always wanted to make climate change documentaries like I'm spent like I mean, that sounds so dorky, but also so principled. Yeah, absolutely. It's to me. But you know, our changing earth is a subject that is could make you could make lots of content about it. You cannot sell a fucking show that deals with the warming climate to any, but nobody fucking wants to look in the mirror when the reflection back may be something horrifying. And on AI, it's like that times one trillion. I don't know. I mean, I'm putting the onus on the public obviously our elected officials need to do much, much better job. And so does the media, but it's a hard one.
This podcast is sponsored by Squarespace. Squarespace is the all-in-one website platform designed to elevate your online presence and drive your success. Squarespace provides all the tools you need to promote and get paid for your services in one platform. Whether you offer consultations, events, or other experiences, Squarespace can help you grow your business. Squarespace offers a complete library of professionally designed and award-winning website templates with options for every use and category. No matter where you start, your website is flexible to what you need with intuitive drag and drop editing, beautiful styling options, unrivaled visual design effects, on brand AI content, and more ways to list what you offer no experience required. Every dream needs a domain. That's what I always say. Squarespace domains makes it easy to find the best name for your business at one fair, all inclusive price, no hidden fees, or add-ons required. Every Squarespace domain comes with advanced privacy and security tools included to ensure your domain remains online and protected. Plus, Squarespace provides everything you need to bring more of your dream to life, whether that means building a website or adding a professional email service. Don't wait to claim your name, invest in your dream domain today. Head to squarespace.com for a free trial,
and when you're ready to launch, go to squarespace.com slash cricket to save 50% off your first purchase of a website or domain. That's squarespace.com slash cricket. Positive America is brought to you by Cook Unity. John, you are like the Cook Unity power user. Well, any fan favorites these days? I had the chicken, meatballs, and quinoa the other night. Probably going to have the chimchery steak tonight. There's also a great surf and turf bowl with shrimp and steak in rice and a bowl. Now you're talking about it. I love Cook Unity. You are a genuine cook-time superfan, and that's because Cook Unity is the first chef-led meal delivery service that makes your meals and small batches inside local microkitchens across the US, not factory. So every dish arrives with the kind of freshness you'd get at the restaurant itself. Meals from Michelin Stard chefs, James Beard winners, and Food Network stars. Go to cookunity.com slash cricket or use the code Crooked before checkout for 50% off your first week. Cook Unity works with some of the best chefs in the country to bring creative, delicious meals to your door.
There are hundreds of dishes to choose from, and the menu is updated constantly. There's over 10 different dietary preferences. High protein, low sodium, GLP1, pescatarian, gluten-free, and more. Over 25 global cuisines, Mediterranean, Korean, Thai, Mexican, Italian, and much, much more. Taste what happens when real award-winning chefs make fresh, small batch materials just for you. Go to cookunity.com slash cricket or enter code Crooked before checkout to get 50% off your first order. That's 50% off your first order by using the code Crooked or going to cookunity.com slash cricket. Well, so as for how voters are feeling about all this, public opinion seems to be evolving as fast as the AI models. In the time, Santa Paul, which was in the field the week that all this AI news was breaking last week, less than 1% of voters said AI was their top issue, the voters trusted Republicans over Democrats by two points on the issue, though 18% that they weren't sure which party to trust, and that was the highest percentage of any issue that they pulled.
In the latest political poll, which was fielded this week, 63% of Americans said there's a real risk that AI will destroy humanity. Over at Blue Rose Research, our friend David Shore found that over the past year, AI has risen as an important issue to voters faster than any other issue, and it's now more important to voters than climate change, childcare and abortion, even crazier. AI salience has increased as much in just the last week as it has the entire last year. Wow. What do you guys make of the rapidly shifting polls on the issue? And then how should Democrats who are Democratic candidates and officials who are rightly freaked out about this, actually handle it and talk about it? Yeah, so let's start with the salience. The salience, as you point out, is growing significantly. And you have to put that also in the context of the fact that one of the dominant issues on the campaign, this cycle has been data centers, which is the that is the manifestation of AI for people. That is the like this is all theoretical to them,
they were there, and here is the thing being built in their community that threatens their jobs, their environment threatens their energy bills, maybe threatens all of humanity. And so we're even Republicans who were pro data center have come out against it. Overwhelmingly voters believe that AI should be regulated, like well over two thirds. In some cases, in some polls, you see it as high as 80%. And you can deserve more regulation. Trump's opinion that we don't need any new regulation is a position that in a recent poll was opposed by 77% of Republicans. Okay. People, this is like people strong that the number of Americans who in a youth poll who believe that AI needs to be slowed down versus the people who think that should be sped up is 34 to 1. And so with Trump has picked the most unpopular position he possibly could. Most Republicans back it or have no position. Therefore, we should subscribe to them. Trump's position. And Democrats should talk about it. And I think it's easiest and best right now in this short term for you're running the campaign to focus on data centers. Because that is the thing
that people understand. But you should be for regulation. You should be for like accountability from these tech companies. You should be pushing back on your opponents who are anti-regulation by pointing out like all of the things, you know, like really going to like look at what happened on social media. We didn't regularly look at all the damage it's been done. The idea that this is being done by a bunch of companies and it's hard to state how unpopular, overstate how unpopular that tech companies are right now. And particularly the, you know, we talk about Dario Amade and Sam Altman, but the faces that people know are Mark Zuckerberg and Elon Musk, who are incredibly, incredibly unpopular. And so, Democrats should be aggressive on this. They should be for regulation. There are a whole bunch of ideas out there. I don't think we know it yet. We don't know enough yet about which ideas are most popular. I think just being, seemingly you understand it, seemingly you are concerned about it, seemingly you have the strength encouraged to take on the big tech companies who are funding this. And that your opponent is being supported by these interests, like whether it's the A super PACs or these Mags super PACs are being funded by a lot of the same
people that they're on the sides of big tech and who do not want to regulate this. Over on still counting, Nate and Claire and Galen this week talked about how the politics of AI feel like they're headed in the same direction that COVID eventually headed, which is two extreme stances with almost no middle ground. Do you guys worry about that? Do you agree? Well, that's my concern about it being used to Democratic advantage on the campaign trail. It's like actually to solve this problem you need by and on both sides of the aisle. And like I can't believe I'm saying this, but seeing Steve Bannon and Bernie Sanders unite on the issue is like feels like a weird fever dream, but also is probably a necessary coalition if you're actually going to do something to stave off the destruction of humanity. And my concern is once it, I mean, what's been interesting about the data center issue is I, again, on run away country, spoke with a former Ken Paxton staffer in deep red Texas who was like, you have no idea how much does animates conservatives on the ground. And that there is bipartisan agreement at the community
level. People are really engaged in a meaningful coalition to stop these things from being built. That's actually how you tackle the problem is you got to get people in red states and blue states across the aisle working together in concert because it's a massive issue that we face as a society. But once it gets dragged down into the realm of like masking or vaccines or whatever, sort of public health and survival issues, what has become of them in terms of like the partisan divide, that's where I really worry. Then we're not going to get anything done and just becomes a, you know, a cudgel one way or the other. You can already hear like David Sacks who is an all-in podcast host, but also more importantly Trump's top advisor on AI was in the White House is out of the White House now, but still his top advisor. And there's been a lot written this week that everything all the decisions Trump has making and all the people, all the advice he's taking is all coming from Sacks. He's already and some of these other guys like pushing all the buttons and making the arguments that I think they believe will turn Republicans back towards their view of
this. So it's like, you know, what Dario wants and anthropic wants is one world totalitarian control of AI and they want to sort of a global government that tells you what to do and what not to do and regulates everything and they're trying to make it, is this like, you know, they're trying to make regulation of AI, common sense safeguards seem as like crazy lefty socialist communist as possible. And I don't know if that will work, but in some areas it will work, I'm sure. I'm pretty skeptical it's going to work. And also, I get what you're saying about making this a political issue because we do need bipartisan support. The problem is if Mike Johnson is speaker of the House, we cannot do anything. Because he does what Trump says and Trump does what David Sacks says, which means we'll do nothing. So we have to win the House. And I think if we can win the House by beating the living shit out of them over these issues, they will feel compelled to do something about it. Because there will be enough Republicans who've already, like, you know, quietly spoken out and like the Steve Bannon people like that are like, yeah, I think I want to do something about that.
And the reason why I think this, I am skeptical to Nate's point here or the still counting people's point because here the there is already bipartisan agreement among the voters on this. And the polarization is between the elites, the Republican Party and the both were put, Democrats are on the side of where the voters are and where Republicans have, where we've ended up in these places like COVID, it's when the politicians go to where the voters are. And the thing is when they go to where the voters are here, they're going to be in the same place where the Democrats are. I also think that the challenge, one challenge with COVID was it became polarized because people were feeling the effects of one policy or another on their lives, right? So a lockdown, you know, a mask, a vaccine, right? Like it's something that you had to do to regulate these companies and regulate AI is not going to really affect what people are already feeling, right? Like even if you like chat GPT, it's not going to shut down your chat GPT. We're talking about future models losing control of them, right? And so it is, it's different now.
It's, I think it's just like a hard to make it like a really galvanized put a argument around the fact that regulation could raise the cost of your chatbot by a dollar, right? Yeah, or that China, well, there are other big things. China's going to be destined, appealing to sort of the most nationalistic impulses and saying, we don't want to lose to China. So we don't want China to develop the AI that they lose control of first. We want to be able to, we want to develop the, we want to develop the AI that we lose control. What the dark day it'll be if we look over there and China has been killed by its AI before we are. And all of us, I mean, at that point, that's the way it's like, I was going to say, it'll be a sputnik moment for America. I mean, the, I mean, the, not you to get into it, but the crazy thing here is like, sure, there's plenty of competition to be had between US and China on AI for like developing all kinds of products that AI will help us develop. But like, there's plenty of common ground and common interest in not developing something that will destroy the planet. Yes. I think the Chinese don't want to destroy the planet either. No, and the Chinese attitude towards AI is very different.
And by the way, the Chinese are much better at regulation than we are. They do it with a steel fist. Okay, speaking of the destruction of human achievement, Trump threw a major tantrum this week after yet another judge ruled that he can't add his name to the Kennedy Center in any way. Afterwards, Trump attacked the judge on truth social and said the buildings are unsafe to operate and quote, destined to doom. Then the Kennedy Center board, chaired by Trump and controlled by his supporters, voted to close the entire facility for repairs until 2028. Trump then posted again saying the quote, the reconstruction and the renovation of the Kennedy Center will not take place until the circuit court overrules the district judge on the name issue. And if that doesn't happen until the Supreme Court overturns the appellate court, here he is on Wednesday trying to explain why this all makes total sense. The Kennedy Center for many years, this was tens of millions of dollars, even hundreds of millions of dollars. It's a loser financially. So for the Trump
administration, for me, to get involved and to take that on long term and to carry it or to raise money to carry it, I think that the Trump administration should certainly have recognition. Because frankly, if we don't do that, it's going to close. It'll end up being ripped down. It's in very, very bad shape, very dangerous. Put my name on it or no one gets it or it smithereens. So later in that day, where he's after he said that, Trump was photographed through the window of Air Force One next to Hatchet Man Bill Pultie, looking at a poster board display reading Kennedy Center demolish. Maybe you sht. Can we see? There it is. There it is. Can you pull out? Can you see the whole picture? On Thursday, the district judge reminded the administration. They must give at least 30 days notice of any changes in its renovation plans, including obviously tearing it down. Alex,
you're from DC. Oh my god. How you feeling about all this? It's like Sherman's March to the Sea. Nothing is going to be left. Much like my one time three year old, it appears that Donald Trump also needs boardbooks to learn. Like that's Richard Scaries, Kennedy Center demolition. Join people. What do people express their mega-miniacal impulses through architecture? It's very sad to me. I grew up going to the Kennedy Center. As a kid, I saw the nutcracker there, I believe. I saw some very bad traveling Broadway musicals there, but it is a cultural institution and so much else that Trump is doing. The courts seem very flat-footed and being able to prevent any of this. I go back to the Supreme Court being totally in Trump's pocket. Look what they did on the ballroom where they concluded that it was likely unlawful, but the plaintiffs in that case didn't have standing. I mean, Trump has figured out a way to gain the system, including and especially when it concerns the architecture of Washington, DC, and his desire to put his imprint on it.
He's figured out how to basically outfox the judicial system, which moves much slower and is clearly the highest court has reluctant to do anything to curb unitary executive power. And as a result, I mean, the idea that he's going forward, this Trump arch between the Lincoln Memorial and Arlington Cemetery, which is like a hallowed stretch of land that is, you know, tells the story of the Civil War and that he's going to insert himself into that as the ashes of the East Wing remain out like a sore on the grounds of the White House. And, you know, now we have to contend with the potential destruction of the Kennedy Center. I mean, it's like we can sort of chuckle about it because it's also ludicrous, but it's so bad. It's so devastating. And for people who grew up there, it's just, it's monstrous. Well, I also was thinking like, so I'm sure Trump has made this argument to someone like, oh, the judge said now that I better not demolish it in the
next 30 days. Well, what are they going to do if I do? Oops. And like, well, what the Supreme Court said, if the Supreme Court says that I'm not supposed to do it, and I do it, what's the Supreme Court going to do? Yeah, that's the most disturbing part of it. They already gave him immunity from official acts. And certainly he'd argue that an official act is renovating the Kennedy Center. Can I offer a solution to this problem? Yeah. Let him put his name on it. And then we'll just take it off. That's true. Like, why do we care? A easy one. I think it's fine. I think it's embarrassing for him. I love him losing. I love him just being just destroyed in his soul for not getting his name on it. But if we're playing the long game, let him put his name there. Better than letting him demolish it. Yeah. Yes. I mean, I think that's his bet too. Just like on inauguration day between the way back from the swearing in, you just take it off. Okay. I'm with you on that as someone who is a Kennedy Center preservationist, but I do worry. It's giving the baby wants a candy so badly. And finally, you're like, just give the baby the fucking candy who cares if you can't chew it. And it's like, if he has given the example that he just needs to threaten the most like,
you know, nuclear option in any scenario, and also the courts are just proving so feckless in terms of stopping him. That gives him that teaches in the lesson that like, yeah, you don't have to listen to the courts. And this is just a test case for other things where he may not want to listen to the courts. And be like, I don't know. There is just something about capitulating to the megalo maniacal impulses that worries me as we like look towards the last years of the Trump presidency when this impulse to put his name on shit and rename and reinvent the American, you know, story in his image is going to be like on steroids. I don't know. I guess or or next democratic president decides that they take all the land around Mar-a-Lago via eminent domain and put up large statues of Barack Obama. Yeah, there's like a thing we can do here. And Hillary Clinton and Joe Biden. That's a great idea. That every time Donald Trump wakes up and looks out the window in Mar-a-Lago, that's all he sees. Just a giant statue of Barack. I know we're
going to have a giant debate in the presidential primary of 2028 about the two biggest issues. AI and whether you should destroy the ballroom or not. Yes. And the questions will be asked one after another. Yes. And I'm a firm believer that the best move here is just to rename the ballroom, the rock, Kichobama ballroom. Immigrant processing center. Well, I think you can stay a ballroom, but I think you should ever once a week, like every Tuesday and noon, you should do a citizenship swearing. Yes, perfect. I'm for all I'm for as petty as possible in like the like any again, you don't need to spend time on it because voters don't want you to spend time on like getting revenge on Donald Trump, but just quietly like use the power of the federal government to take his name off everything. Well, yeah, that's sure. That's sure. I think not even the big things. I'm saying like what other presidents get? Just erase him from his doing. Like every building, every port. But just take it all out. Can we do we get to rename the Palm Beach Airport from Congress? Or is that? Oh, well, of course, let's do it. Can we stop us the Supreme Court? Meltdown Trump coins and gil the statue of Barack Obama to go on the golf course.
Race that man from history. Like we should do the thing with Trump Trump airport that DC did with Reagan National Park, which is they never put Reagan on the subway map. Oh, yeah. That's very true. So we can just so the FAA will declare it will go back to being like WPB or whatever it was on the board. Next president is out there every day talking about cost-deliving and fighting for fighting for you and your family. And meanwhile, there's an agency somewhere in the federal government and that person all day long is just figuring out how to erase Donald Trump from history. You know what? That's a his. I'm raising my hand right now. You're what that's all? I don't care who wins. Democratic Socialists, conservative, ever-else, I am volunteering that I would do. I do it for free. Oh, I take one dollar. Okay. One Trump coin. You have to take one Trump coin to do it by even Trump takes one Trump coin for his job. Okay. And I wouldn't be in charge of petty shit. That's like you're a doge band of one. You'll go in with a backpack. I mean, there's going to be a stiff competition for that job from people on other shows.
But you know, there's MS now. There's might as well. There's the whole resistance. We can do media universe. We can do it. We can rotate everyone. Everyone who's a podcast in the top 50 gets a month. It's a beautiful idea. And taxpayers will be elbowing out Jim Acosta. It's going to be a whole thing. Jim Acosta is going to be he's going to be right back in the brief room in the front row. He will be the press secretary. Let's just rethink that one. Yeah. Well, if the robots let us survive to see it. Yeah. Unclear. When we come back, my interview with Nebraska Senate candidate Dan Osborne. I pod say America's brought to you by blinds.com is a version of your home. You haven't lived in yet where the light behaves. Just how you want where the rooms feel finished where you sleep until you decide to wake up not when the sun does blinds.com has been 30 years making it easy to find the perfect fit with over 25 million windows covered and 50,000 five star views. You can feel confident. You're in good hands. Whether you want to go full DIY, bring in licensed embedded pros to handle
the measure and install or land somewhere in between. You're always in control. They make it simple to choose the level of support that works best for you with flexibility every step of the way. Need help picking the right style? Book a free consultation with one of blinds.com's award-winning design experts. No pushy salespeople. No awkward in home visits. Just real advice on your schedule. They'll even ship samples to your door fast and free. Choose from a huge variety of style options at prices that fit any budget. Everything is backed by blinds.com's 100% satisfaction. Because at blinds.com, the only thing they treat better than windows is you. We love blinds.com. We have great blinds.com. Shades in our office. They came in. They installed them. They're automatic. We have a little remote for them so that when it's really sunny or hot, late in the day, we can lower them a bit. They're fantastic. They've made our office better. They look nice, recommended. Right now blinds.com is giving our listeners an exclusive $50 off when you spend $500 or more. Just use code cricket to check out limited time offer rules and restrictions apply cblinds.com for details. I'm Nate Silver. I'm Galen Drouk. And I'm Claire Malone.
We're back. This time with our friends at Crooked Media for a new show called Still Counting. Yeah, numbers are hard. Take ser easy. And frankly, numbers have only gotten harder. What does the data actually say? How do we reconcile that with the other things that we're seeing in American politics and around the world? And how do we use that data to understand or maybe even dare to predict the future of American politics? New episodes every Wednesday starting September 9th. Subscribe to Still Counting on youtube.com slash at Still Counting Podcast or wherever you get your podcast. This is Matt Rogers from Los Cultures. That's with Matt Rogers and Bowen Yang. This is Bowen Yang from Los Cultures. It's Matt Rogers and Bowen Yang. You know when people try on new food and suddenly it's like, wait, that's the reaction. A lot of people are having when they first try cutie mayo. It's the one with the red cap and the little baby on the bottle. You've probably seen it in the grocery store before. And if you've ever just walked past it, some people would say that's a huge mistake because this mayo is different. Most mayonnaise uses whole eggs.
Cutie only uses egg yolks, which gives it this rich umami flavor. It's smoother, deeper, and almost buttery. Once people try it, they start putting it on everything. Egg sandwiches, fries, burgers, some fans even swear by dipping pizza crust in it. And once you notice it, you start seeing it everywhere. Chefs use it, restaurants use it. People who really care about flavor use it. Never try it. Grab the bottle with the red cap next time you're at the store. Put it on just about anything. Then you'll understand. Cute be the original Japanese mayonnaise. Dan Osborne, welcome back to Plights Ava America. Thank you. It's good to be here. I appreciate it. It's a have you. Yeah. So by now you spend a lot of time talking to people who voted for Trump and are now willing to vote for you or thinking about voting for you. What are you hearing from them now that might be different than what you were hearing in 2024 when you ran? Yeah, I mean, they're still the same people. Right. I think a lot of people voted for Donald Trump because he
represented something kind of like what I'm representing running outside the two party system. Anti-establishment. That type of thing is what really compelled a lot of people to him. But what they're finding now, the big difference is policy. Now versus 2024 is policy is hurting a lot of people. You start with the fact that we haven't passed a farm bill into blanket tariff policy. That's hurting our row crop farmers. Now the war in Iran with inputs and fuel prices. You know, just and now this Argentinian beef deal, 300,000 metric tons of beef coming in. And yeah, our producers just keep kicked in the teeth. And so they're still upset. And you know, it's all about running outside of the establishment and trying to make a true change because people are tired of Chuck Schumer and Mitch McConnell and nothing getting done for them.
Now speaking of Trump voters, I know you're dealing today with I saw there's a leaked recording of you talking about Trump voters and why they voted for Trump. And you said, Billy Bob and fucking Red Cloud Nebraska, who lives next door to the fucking Trump stores, he pull into town and is waving the Trump flag. All he knows is he's on the winning team. It's really that simple and Trump that's why he's been so effective. And that's all they care about because their lives probably suck so fucking bad. What's your response to that? I mean, do you think their lives suck so fucking bad? Well, I think their lives are certainly a lot harder that they get every single year. And you know, that when I said that, I was angry. And a lot of them are angry, right, that we keep getting left behind. We keep getting ignored. And it's this you look at, you look at Congress and it's a country club. You know, you look at my opponent,
Pete Ricketts, he's doing this as like a vanity project. Why does he need to be a senator? He's got his family as $8 billion. You can go do whatever he wants, but yet he chooses to go to the United States Senate and try to take healthcare away from people. That doesn't make any sense. So we're all fed up. You know, I regret saying that in the way I said it. Certainly, because I I'm not here to to try to piss people off and offend people. Quite the opposite is true. We're creating a coalition of Republicans and Democrats and libertarians and independent people who are fed up with the federal government and then not being listened to and being talked down to. And so that came from a place of anger, just like the, you know, your standard Trump voters angry right now too. Yeah. And what is that? Maybe you can describe a conversation you've had with the Trump voter where, you know, they've said, I've been with Trump for a while and it's hard to vote for someone who's not a Republican or not a not someone who's, you know, doesn't support
but you know, I'm starting to change my mind. Yeah. Congressional District 3 in Nebraska is rural Nebraska. It's the fifth reddest district in the country and everybody out there is Republican. You have to be if you even want to vote in primaries, right? Right. And I love going and talking to those people because first of all, they don't they don't want to talk down to you. You know, I tell them about my military service, you know, and some of the ideas I want to, they want to do and that's that's good enough for them. A lot of times in, in, in, uh, Democrat spaces, uh, people want to talk down to you. They want you to be perfect on every single issue all the time. And, uh, you know, so branching out into CD3 and talking to farmers and ranchers. Uh, I love doing that. And I was talking to one. He was just getting off his John Deere. He, farms, uh, 2000 acres, he switches back between corn and beans. He's doing corn this year. It did beans in 2025 and, and he's a three time trump voter. And, and he was, uh, he's upset,
right? And that's that's where that comment came from. It's, it's, uh, his life is getting harder because he was telling me he sees Argentina get bailed out by 20 billion dollars. They're swathing farmers. They then, uh, take the tariff off for China, right? And then China buys from them leaving our guys where, uh, without a market to sell to. And so I asked him if the bailout, the 12 billion that they're getting is going to help him. And he was like, man, uh, it's supposed to help me for 2026 in my inputs, but the war in Iran, I had to write a check for $50,000 more for my fertilizer than I would have if, if I was able to put that in pre war. Like that's real money. And that's why these guys are, are mad. And that's why that's where I was referencing, you know, life is getting hard for them. That's not including the diesel fuel, right? So the dominoes are falling. I keep talking about a farm crisis that we're in. Like we have, uh, but we sit on, it starts with the ogolala aquifer. We sit on the largest body of freshwater in the world. It's 300 million years old.
And we're depleting it six times faster than it gets replenished, right? So a lot of Nebraska is drying up Kansas, Texas. Uh, and then you add in the fact that they're still on extension for a farm bill from 2018. So their prices, their, their subsidy prices, their crop prices outdated. The average age for a farmer 64 kids aren't want to stay on the farm. Bankruptcies are up 46% because of bad policy on, uh, family farms and ranches. It's going to go higher even this year. A farmer suicide is three times three and a half times the national average. You know, I was talking to a 911 rate operator out by Alliance Nebraska and he was saying they're, they're called their phones ring all day long. The farmers not know what to do. And this is real, right? And, uh, not enough people are talking about it because 2% of the population feed the rest of us, right? That's, it's so important to talk about this. But, you know, my opponent, he just wants to talk about boys and girls sports and, and things that affects zero people in Nebraska.
And then, and then, you know, leaks, audio or whatever he's trying to do because he knows that we're ahead right now. And so he has made a living off of dragging other people down in politics. You know, they're, I can name at least eight people that he has spent hundreds of thousands of dollars Republicans to, uh, in their primaries, trying to ruin their lives. What do you think the Democratic Party loses people who like you are, uh, union folks support, uh, taking on corporate power, making healthcare more affordable, making life better for farmers? Where does the Democratic Party lose those people? I think, I think they've, uh, they haven't invested, um, in those people, in the fact that, you know, especially who they run for candidates, run for office. You know, if you want to be the champion for working people, you should probably have some, some working folks in there, right? Instead they, they seem to just want to recruit lawyers and business execs and
college professors, uh, that again, like to talk down to people and take an hour to explain something and want you to be perfect on everything. Uh, that, that's where I get frustrated with Democrats. When you disagree with someone on immigration or a cultural issue, what do you say that sort of keeps them in the conversation? Yeah, you know, whether it's, uh, especially immigration, you know, uh, I'm 51 years old. I know I don't look at, not at all. Yeah. Uh, I definitely feel it. Uh, but yeah, I'm 51 years old and, and there hasn't been any really meaningful immigration, comprehensive immigration reforms since I've been alive. Why? Right? Why? Well, we've had, Democrats have had a chance where they've had the House, the Senate and, and the executive branch. That didn't get done. The Republicans same thing. Who are the ones driving? Who doesn't want immigration reform to happen? Well, I could take a few guesses and my guess would be Tyson, uh, JBS,
the big meat packers that exploit labor, um, pay them next to nothing, uh, enrich themselves every single quarter, the record profits, uh, for, for, uh, their stockholders. And those are the ones that give Pete Ricketts, uh, money for his war chest. So he turns the other way. Uh, you know, that, that's got to end. We need immigration reform. We got to get everybody to the table. That's what I'm interested in bringing, bringing in the, the companies, the small businesses, the immigration advocates, lawyers and judges and, and figuring this out, but it doesn't seem like, uh, they want to get it done because it all goes back to the money in politics and, and that's why I don't take corporate money. That's why I'm running outside the two-party system. I just really want, I really want to do this different and show that it can be done differently for people. And then you've talked about, uh, unimmigration, or the increased enforcement, making sure the borders secure, um, on, uh, what's happening inside the country with all the undocumented immigrants here.
There's an undocumented person who's been in this country for years, has a job, family, no criminal record. Should that person be deported or should there be a way for them to stay legally? Yeah, they're stuck in a broken system. Um, you know, and we were promised that, uh, violent criminals were going to be getting deported. And, you know, the fundamental mission of immigration, custom enforcement is to make sure that doesn't happen, right? That, that MS-13 doesn't come and set up shopper neighborhoods. And if they do, deported. Right. That's, that makes sense. I agree with that fundamental mission. But not, and, and every other administration has performed that mission off of a, uh, modest budget of seven billion dollars. And now, you know, if you, if you call yourself a true fiscal conservative, you should be irritated the fact that, uh, wasteful government spending now, we're up to 80 billion dollars. They're rivaling the, uh, Marine Corps budget now. Uh, and so again, the answer goes getting people at the table
that actually want to get this done. That just don't want to continue to play political football with it to try to win elections and just do it because, and, and do it in a humane way, because at the end of the day, I'm team human being. I'm team people, right? And, and, and we all have this shared thing called humanity, right? We're all floating around on this rocket 46,000 miles an hour just trying to figure our day out. Yeah. And it sounds like then you think those people should be given a chance to stay. Yeah, there should be a chance there. There should be a visa program, a work visa program. Um, you know, especially on our ranches and farms, uh, you know, in our industries, uh, where, uh, I mean, you, you think about the level of, of trying to deport every single person that came across the border, uh, or, or came here on a visa that's expired, trying to do it the right way to deport that amount of people. I mean, it would take what, uh, you do, do the math 100 years,
I don't even know. Like it's, it's insane. So we should figure this out and we should have hard conversations and get to adults at the table to figure this out. The fact that they're not doing it drives me nuts. Would you, uh, would you vote to reverse the Medicaid cuts and Trump's, uh, tax bill? Yeah. Definitely. We have, we have a lot of, we have a lot of work to do, uh, reversing things in the, in that act. Um, I imagine you have a lot of people in Nebraska, um, whether they're on Medicaid or not, who are just really upset about the cost of their health care. Yeah. What's something you think you'd like to see done on health care to just lower prices, lower cost for people if you get to the Senate? Yeah. I think it just, just like at the turn of the century, in 1900s, right, we had the robber barons, the gilded age. We had that oil and steel tycoons and the banking tycoons and they have masked, uh, more wealth than over 90% of the country. Well, we're there again. Uh, actually it's worse this time. So what did the American people do?
They, they, they voted and they voted for people like Woodrow Wilson and Teddy Roosevelt, that champion antitrust and anti-monopoly ideas and they, uh, they broke up the titans of industry, the meat packing industry and they created, uh, the America's middle class, which then cultivated one of the strongest economies the world's ever seen. That's how we do it. And healthcare is no different. You have CVS and United Health that have vertically integrated the entire healthcare system. They own every step of the process while denying us our care and our claims and they continue to post record profits quarter after quarter. So we shouldn't allow this type of, uh, these, these companies to operate the way they do. But again, how do we even fix that when we got to get money out of politics, right? We got to make it so that the, the CEO can't donate an unlimited amount of money to an independent expenditure of a campaign. Yeah. What does that look like in terms of policy if you, if you get to the Senate like, you know,
people are gonna, they're, they're gonna see their premiums go up and they're gonna be struggling with costs and they're gonna say, all right, well, what are you doing for me? Uh, how, how are you gonna lower cost? Yeah. Well, that's gonna be me going and gathering the minds, right? And, and being able to create a policy and a policy platform that works for the American people in their healthcare. And I know you don't do that by inviting the CEO of CVS and United Health into the room where I come from, I come from the shop floor. And I worked a lot of years and I saw the company Kellogg's come in and just make, you know, we call them the bean counters come in and, and make all these crazy decisions and we're telling them trying to raise the rate red flag saying, hey, this isn't gonna work, guys, uh, include us, uh, but they never did. And then, you know, they install the machine. I'm stuck trying to get this thing to, to limp along and sometimes they'd rip it out. Sometimes I was able to frank and stint it up enough to get it going, right? But that's the way my
mind works. So I know that if we want to fix healthcare, we're gonna go talk to the nurses, right? That, that, uh, understand it at a level of bedside care, uh, the doctors and the hospital administrators, the, the people who, uh, have to deny claims and, and have a deep understanding of the healthcare system, get those people together in a room and come up with a policy that we know is going to work. You said that, uh, you won't caucus with either party. Uh, the center, of course, still has to decide who runs its committees and sets the agenda. If your vote is decisive, what would either party have to agree to before you'd support its plan to organize the Senate? That's a big question. Uh, I'm not, I'm not sure what, what the subject matter is, uh, that you're referring to. Well, I mean, you get, you get to the Senate and, um, you know, you don't caucus with either party, but at some point everyone's gonna vote on leader.
And then everyone's gonna vote on who runs the Senate because they, they're in charge of committees. Mm-hmm. And so imagining if you're, and it's very possible if you, if you win, if you're the deciding vote, then a schumer and a thune come up to you and say, okay, uh, I know you're not gonna caucus with us all the time, but like, what do we have to get to make one of us leader or not? What, what, what are the big issues? What do you care about? What would you ask for? Because you'd be, you'd get to ask for a lot of that. Yeah, yeah. Absolutely. Um, yeah, that's, uh, you know, if, uh, the people I talked to on the ground, if they had a, uh, a magic wand, I always ask that question. If you have a magic wand and you could wave it, what would be the one thing that you could fix in the government? Um, that, that would work for you. I've asked, I've been out in the middle of the sand hills and asked to ranch for this, uh, on a cow calf operation. I've asked, I've asked this at nursing seminars, uh, to teachers and all across the board, it's healthcare. It's healthcare is too expensive. So many of us are, are one hospital trip away from, um,
go and broke and going in the red, right? And, uh, it would, it would be to, uh, fix healthcare. It would be to have, um, their word that, that we're gonna work on this and we're gonna get it done for the American people. Um, uh, so everybody deserves to have access to affordable, uh, healthcare. If you, uh, if you win, what's one promise you want people to remember so they can come back and, and hold you to it, even if, even if it makes your life harder in Washington. Yeah. Well, the, the promise I have is, uh, every morning, I'm going to wake up and ask myself a question, how can I elevate somebody's life today? How can I, how can I help the workers of my state and potentially, uh, the country? How can we help do that today? It's not going to be, who can I call, today, that's going to give me money for a victory fund so I can keep working in Washington, DC. I'm not interested in that. I'm interested in helping people. And every, every policy and
everything that I'm going to approach in the Senate is going to be based off of that, right? That shared human experience that we have, um, you know, the golden rule treat others like you want to be treated. Uh, it's not about the corporations and, and who's going to get rich. Uh, I don't think there should be any ceilings. I think we should have a strong foundation, but we should be able to uplift everybody. And, uh, that's what I'm interested in. That's what I guarantee you're going to get from me. Dan Osborne, thanks for, uh, thanks for coming on Pots of America. Good luck with the campaign. Thank you. Take care. Yeah. That's our show for today. Dan Alex, do this all the time. Until the robots take our bodies completely, we'll continue to be here in person every seven and a half months. Uh, good news. I'll be back. Oh, yeah. Next Thursday. Well, he says it was such a joy. That's great. He literally blinked like this fucking reality is now dawning on me. We need more excuses for you to come here. I'm just, well, let's see if you're amazing book, the steel. It will be up paper by it. Buy it. The movie's never coming, which you buy. You
buy it. The movie's coming in 2079. Let's beat 10 crews, guys. Uh, Tommy will be back in the phenom Sunday. Uh, he's interviewing Fox News's in-house resistance hero, our friend Jessica Tarlov. And then, uh, John and Tommy and I will see you on Tuesday. Bye, everyone. Bye. Pots of America is a crooked media production. Our show is produced by Austin Fisher, Saul Rubin, McKenna Roberts and Ferris Safari with Reed Charlene, Elijah Cohn and Adrian Hill. Our team includes Matt DeGroat, Ben Heffko, Jordan Cantor, Charlotte Landis, David Tolls, Mia Kelman, Ryan Young and Naomi Single. Our staff is probably unionized with the writer's Guild of America East. I'm Nate Silver. I'm Galen Drook and I'm Claire Malone. We're back. This time with our friends at crooked media for a new show called Still Counting. Yeah, numbers are hard. Take ser easy. And frankly, numbers have only gotten harder. What does the data actually say? How do we reconcile that with the other things that we're seeing in American politics and around the world? And how do we use that data to understand or maybe even dare to
predict the future of American politics? New episodes every Wednesday starting September 9th. Subscribe to Still Counting on youtube.com slash at Still Counting Podcast or wherever you get your podcasts. I was grabbing my morning coffee the other day, the hum of the espresso machine, people shuffling in half a week, that familiar rush of a weekday. When I noticed a framed photo on the wall of a coastal hotel in Portugal, something about it pulled me in. Suddenly, that cliffside stay was all I could think about. The easy way to get there is booking.com. The search, the options, the way the stay comes together makes planning feel seamless. Once a place gets into your head, booking.com is an easy way to get there. Go on, book that trip. It's easy booking.com booking. Yeah. Hey guys, it's Ashley Kennedy from the Ben and Ashley, I almost have his podcast. My friend said this one's and I have adopted it as my own. She goes, I'm not a crunchy mom, but I'm a crispy mom. And I'm like, that is me too. Like, of course,
we're going to have our junk food days. But primarily when we're eating inside the house, I am very particular about what I buy and make for my kids because sometimes, you know, like for example, they're going to eat chicken nuggets, right? They're going to eat macaroni and cheese, but I'm trying to find the best possible versions of those. And in order to do that, I use this really great app when I'm grocery shopping. It's called Wise Code. And it's basically an ultra-processed food detector. All you do is scan a product to instantly see if it's ultra-processed. They go beyond the label. You're able to view nutrition quality and health quality. It makes grocery shopping easy. It helps you make more informed decisions for your family. It's available on the app store. I love, love, love it. It is exactly what a crispy mom needs. You can download Wise Code, the ultra-processed food detector on the app store today.
More episodes
More from Pod Save America

Trump Bans Crooked Media
Pod Save America

Fighting with Fox News feat. Jessica Tarlov
Pod Save America

Artificial Intelligence, Actual Idiots
Pod Save America

On the Ground in Michigan with Abdul El-Sayed
Pod Save America
