
About this episode
As Justice Kagan has asked, “Every other industry has to internalize the costs of its conduct. Why is it that the tech industry gets a pass?” Yet she and the other 8 Supreme Court Justices seemed wary this week as they heard oral arguments in two cases that could upend the Section 230 immunity that social media companies enjoy, Gonzalez v. Google and Twitter v. Taamneh. Today, we hear from three experts: Stanford Law professor Evelyn Douek, National Constitution Center President and CEO Jeffrey Rosen and UC Berkeley computer science professor Hany Farid. Up for discussion — what’s at stake in these two cases, which way the wind seems to be blowing and, of course, will killing Section 230 kill the internet?
Questions? Comments? Email us [email protected] or find us on Twitter @karaswisher and @nayeema
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices
Get every episode summarized
Each time On with Kara Swisher publishes, we email you a written briefing from the transcript — the topics, who appeared, and any specific claims, with the ad reads skipped.
Email me new episodesFree for 3 shows. No card needed.
No transcript yet
This episode has not been transcribed. Request it and it moves to the front of the queue.
More episodes
More from On with Kara Swisher

Flock Cameras, Meta Glasses and the Surveillance Backlash
On with Kara Swisher
Sep 14, 20261:05:43completed

The Bulwark’s Sarah Longwell on How Democrats Can Defeat MAGA for Good
On with Kara Swisher
Sep 10, 202659:00completed

Why This Crypto Billionaire Wants to Slow Down the AI Arms Race
On with Kara Swisher
Sep 7, 202652:12completed

Three Mayors of Blue Cities in a Polarized America
On with Kara Swisher
Sep 3, 20261:10:20completed