Skip to content
TrackPodcasts
newsJul 11, 20181:05:58pending

Why the DC establishment is missing the point on the judiciary Ep. 249

About this episode

What is it that is broken about the courts? What are the trends? How do we fix it? And how does a SCOTUS pick help redress the problem? The D.C. legal conservatives don’t want to observe these problems or even ask these questions. This is why they are coming to the wrong conclusions about the type of justice we need on the court and the limit of even the best justices to fix the system absent broader reforms that they oppose or ignore. In this episode, we discuss the core problems with the lower courts and the judicial velocity and how once you understand that, anything short of a Clarence Thomas who would 100 percent uproot the judicial cancer won’t solve the problem. It’s akin to taking out most of a tumor, which sounds nice, but is actually worthless. It’s in this vein that we explore some of the concerning aspects of Kavanaugh’s record.  Show links Death by a thousand lawsuits in the lower courts A realist view of Kavanaugh Sen. Kennedy on the need to press nominees on philosophy   Copyright CRTV. All rights reserved. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Get every episode summarized

Each time Conservative Review with Daniel Horowitz publishes, we email you a written briefing from the transcript — the topics, who appeared, and any specific claims, with the ad reads skipped.

Email me new episodes

Free for 3 shows. No card needed.

Hosts & guests

No transcript yet

This episode has not been transcribed. Request it and it moves to the front of the queue.

Why the DC establishment is missing the point on the judiciary Ep. 249

Conservative Review with Daniel Horowitz

0:00
1:05:58

More episodes

More from Conservative Review with Daniel Horowitz

View all episodes →