About this episode
Meta's decision to end its third-party fact-checking program threatens to reshape the Philippine information landscape—and not for the better. In this episode, journalist Nica Hanopol sits down with disinformation researcher and political communications professor JM Lanuza to unpack what this means for Filipino audiences who already navigate a sea of misinformation online.
With 34% of Filipinos consulting fact-checking sites—higher than the global average—the stakes couldn't be clearer. But as funding cuts sweep through counter-disinformation efforts and platforms shift toward opaque "community notes" systems, who stands to benefit? And more importantly, who loses?
This episode is produced by Nica Rhiana Hanopol and engineered by Anthony Tobias. Jaemark Tordecilla is our editor-at-large.
Listen to our episodes on: Spotify, Apple Podcasts, YouTube, or wherever you get your podcasts.
For more updates, follow Teka Teka on these platforms: Facebook, X, Instagram, and TikTok.
Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Get every episode summarized
Each time Teka Teka publishes, we email you a written briefing from the transcript — the topics, who appeared, and any specific claims, with the ad reads skipped.
Email me new episodesFree for 3 shows. No card needed.
Hosts & guests
No transcript yet
This episode has not been transcribed. Request it and it moves to the front of the queue.
More episodes
More from Teka Teka
Who pays for the green transition?
Teka Teka
Can a social media ban for children do more harm than good?
Teka Teka
Ano ang system loss charges at anong epekto ng pag-alis nito sa ating bayarin sa...
Teka Teka
What is wealth tax and how can we benefit from it?
Teka Teka