
About this episode
The Constitution Study with Host Paul Engel – Federal judges increasingly claim neutrality while advancing political preferences from the bench. Judicial rulings against Trump policies, immigration enforcement, and federal grand jury subpoenas raise questions about constitutional duty, impartiality, and whether the courts still function as umpires applying law, or as policymakers shaping outcomes through personal bias and agenda...
Get every episode summarized
Each time Courts | America Out Loud News publishes, we email you a written briefing from the transcript — the topics, who appeared, and any specific claims, with the ad reads skipped.
Email me new episodesFree for 3 shows. No card needed.
Hosts & guests
No transcript yet
This episode has not been transcribed. Request it and it moves to the front of the queue.
More episodes
More from Courts | America Out Loud News

Judicial roulette: Will the courts protect your rights or crush them?
Courts | America Out Loud News
Sep 12, 202656:51completed

A New Yorker, a Congressman, and a Supreme Court Justice walk into a bar
Courts | America Out Loud News
Sep 9, 202657:07completed

Is public education unconstitutional? Nebraska Court to decide
Courts | America Out Loud News
Sep 9, 202656:56completed

Beyond the headlines: Jobs, justice and public trust
Courts | America Out Loud News
Sep 8, 202657:09failed