
About this episode
Decades ago, our government, and the body that oversees Canadian broadcasting, decided that homemade content was in danger of being overwhelmed by the vast flood of music, television, and film coming from the United States. The solution? A policy that required broadcasters to fill a certain amount of their programming with Canadian-made content, or "CanCon" as it came to be known.
But the media landscape looks very, very different today than it did in 1991. And while Canadian-made content still manages to break through (see: Rivalry, Heated), and the CRTC has periodically updated the regulations, there's no question the CanCon policy no longer covers all it was intended to. Should it change? Did it work? Is it still needed? Not at all, or more than ever?
Michael Geist is the Canada Research Chair in Internet and E-Commerce Law at the University of Ottawa, and one of the country's foremost experts in media policy in the digital age. He joins Jordan to explain 35 years of CanCon, and if we need 35 more.
Feedback from listeners is so, so welcome. If you have something to say, email us: [email protected].
Get every episode summarized
Each time CanCon publishes, we email you a written briefing from the transcript — the topics, who appeared, and any specific claims, with the ad reads skipped.
Email me new episodesFree for 3 shows. No card needed.
Hosts & guests
No transcript yet
This episode has not been transcribed. Request it and it moves to the front of the queue.
More episodes
More from CanCon

What is YouTube 'Slopaganda'? And why is it pushing Alberta separation?
CanCon

When music went digital Canada was at the front of the line. What happened?
CanCon

Can Canadian tech fix 911 wait times? Do we trust AI enough to let it try?
CanCon

What makes a company "Canadian" enough for government contracts?
CanCon
