
About this episode
Joe and Chris discuss the Rittenhouse verdict and the limits of self-defense standards. Specifically, at what point can stripping a case of all its context rob it of value. Meanwhile, Sheriffs are refusing to enforce laws -- usually vaccine and mask requirements. What are the limits of prosecutorial discretion and, how in the world is it okay for an activist group to offer scholarships to law enforcement for neglecting their duties? Finally, we check in on NYU's FedSoc chapter where board members resigned after learning that the group is doing... exactly what the Federalist Society is created to do.
Special thanks to our sponsors, Lexicon and Nota.
Get every episode summarized
Each time Above the Law - Thinking Like a Lawyer publishes, we email you a written briefing from the transcript — the topics, who appeared, and any specific claims, with the ad reads skipped.
Email me new episodesFree for 3 shows. No card needed.
Hosts & guests
No transcript yet
This episode has not been transcribed. Request it and it moves to the front of the queue.
More episodes
More from Above the Law - Thinking Like a Lawyer

The ILTACON Wrap-Up
Above the Law - Thinking Like a Lawyer
Sep 3, 202638:32completed

A Tribute, A Tactic, Or An Appellate Issue?
Above the Law - Thinking Like a Lawyer
Aug 26, 202626:35pending

Luigi's Double Jeopardy Gamble And The DOJ's Complicity
Above the Law - Thinking Like a Lawyer
Aug 19, 202632:25pending

Biglaw Surrenders Were Worse Than We Thought
Above the Law - Thinking Like a Lawyer
Aug 12, 202631:25pending