
About this episode
In 2016 the American Heart Association called for Cardiorespiratory Fitness (CRF), generally measured using VO2max, to be included as a vital sign. They said:
“The underlying premise of this statement is that the addition of CRF for risk classification presents health professionals with unique opportunities to improve patient management and to encourage lifestyle-based strategies designed to reduce cardiovascular risk.”
In this episode we discuss the arguments made and evidence cited in that statement, as well the update published in 2024.
If you're the type to want follow up citations/further readings, here are a few that we found interesting (but you can find many more cited in the two statements linked above):
People over 60 can still improve their VO2 by just as much as young people, relative to their baseline.
Here's where you'll find the normative values from the Fitness Registry and the Importance of Exercise National Database (FRIEND) that we discussed.
And before you ask, we also briefly address the classic "strength vs cardio" debate. Here are some studies we used to support it:
Association of Resistance Exercise with Cardiovascular Disease Morbidity and Mortality (yes, we understand that CVD is probably not the right place to look for strength training benefits)
Optimum dosing of resistance training for health and longevity
Get every episode summarized
Each time MOPs & MOEs publishes, we email you a written briefing from the transcript — the topics, who appeared, and any specific claims, with the ad reads skipped.
Email me new episodesFree for 3 shows. No card needed.
Hosts & guests
No transcript yet
This episode has not been transcribed. Request it and it moves to the front of the queue.
More episodes
More from MOPs & MOEs

The Illusion of Certainty with Franco Impellizzeri
MOPs & MOEs

Our Favorite Exercises
MOPs & MOEs

Value Capture: When Metrics Take Over with C. Thi Nguyen
MOPs & MOEs

Juiced Up: Talking Testosterone with Barbell Medicine
MOPs & MOEs