Unpacking the SC decision on Vice President Sara Duterte’s impeachment case
About this episode
In a landmark decision that stunned many legal experts, the Philippine Supreme Court dismissed the impeachment case against Vice President Sara Duterte, citing the constitutional "one-year bar" rule. Oscar Franklin Tan, constitutional law expert and former law professor, joins PumaPodcast editor-at-large Jaemark Tordecilla to unpack how the Court’s ruling diverged from the 2003 Francisco v. House of Representatives precedent, an earlier case that had set precedents in impeachment proceedings in the country.
They discuss how the 97-page decision quietly rewrote established impeachment rules without clearly stating it was overturning precedent. The implications could be far-reaching: this ruling may not only tie the hands of the House in holding top officials accountable, but also complicate future impeachment efforts through new procedural hurdles.
This episode is engineered by Anthony Tobias.
Listen to our episodes on: Spotify, Apple Podcasts, YouTube, or wherever you get your podcasts.
For more updates, follow Teka Teka on these platforms: Facebook, X, Instagram, and TikTok.
Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Get every episode summarized
Each time Teka Teka publishes, we email you a written briefing from the transcript — the topics, who appeared, and any specific claims, with the ad reads skipped.
Email me new episodesFree for 3 shows. No card needed.
Hosts & guests
No transcript yet
This episode has not been transcribed. Request it and it moves to the front of the queue.
More episodes
More from Teka Teka
Who pays for the green transition?
Teka Teka
Can a social media ban for children do more harm than good?
Teka Teka
Ano ang system loss charges at anong epekto ng pag-alis nito sa ating bayarin sa...
Teka Teka
What is wealth tax and how can we benefit from it?
Teka Teka