
Turning the Dials Back on Psychopathy: Decent People, Indecent System | Frankly 157
About this episode
This week's Frankly builds on Nate's recent conversation with systems theorist Greg Elliott, who came on the platform to discuss why our institutions themselves have become psychopathic and how that affects the behavior of the average human. Nate maps Greg's framework onto the global economic Superorganism through the imagery of seven "dials" that can be turned to change the incentives baked into the system – from those that might be present in a small-scale, collaborative community to those of the modern, complex society we live in today. Together, these dials help explain how a species whose ancestral social world rewarded cooperation could construct institutions that increasingly reward extraction.
Nate also explores how the same prosocial people who might individually tend toward reciprocity, empathy, and coordination can behave very differently when the conditions around them change and begin to reward psychopathic traits. The carbon pulse brought forward cheap energy, abstraction, enormous scale, and concentrated power – making it easier than ever before to hide responsibility and detach economic measures from the living systems they represent. The central question of this episode asks what can still be rebuilt at the human scale, whether it's in the form of deeper local relationships, shorter feedback loops, mutual dependence, or institutions where ordinary people can still participate in writing the rules of the system.
Which of these seven dials is most flipped toward the economic Superorganism in your own life, and can you turn it back – even if only partially? How do we remain more prosocial when systemic incentives reward the opposite? And what interventions might we make to bring the system itself more into alignment with our biophysical reality?
(Recorded August 25th, 2026)
Watch this video episode on YouTube
Want to learn the broad overview of The Great Simplification in 30 minutes? Watch our Animated Movie.
---
Support The Institute for the Study of Energy and Our Future
Get every episode summarized
Each time The Great Simplification with Nate Hagens publishes, we email you a written briefing from the transcript — the topics, who appeared, and any specific claims, with the ad reads skipped.
Email me new episodesFree for 3 shows. No card needed.
Hosts & guests
Transcript ready
256 searchable segments. Every word is indexed and playable.
Full transcript
The Great Simplification with Nate Hagens — Turning the Dials Back on Psychopathy: Decent People, Indecent System | Frankly 157. Machine-transcribed; use the interactive transcript above to jump the player to any line.
Good morning. I have been thinking about psychopathy and its influence on modern human culture and the biosphere. We just had on the author of the psychopathic selection hypothesis, Greg Elliott on TGS. Last year we had Reid Maloy and Nancy McWilliams on to discuss dark triad traits in their role in modern society. Following that, I did a frankly on why humans as individuals as opposed to humanity in aggregate, why humans are better than we think. Pointing out that 99% of us are generally pro-social and kind, but we live in a system that selects and rewards predatory behavior. Greg's episode merged unexpectedly with my logic of a global metabolic super-organism in that he likened our economic system itself to psychopathic expressions, though he used the term instrumental behavior as opposed to psychopathic.
So just like last year after Reid and Nancy, this week's frankly is my follow on thoughts and integration of what I learned from Greg's episode. So we've never really covered game theory on TGS until this week. So here's a 30 second version for anyone unfamiliar, a game at its simplest is merely players, choices and payoffs. And we play these games every day through the choices we make when we interact with other people. A strategy is a way of playing the game. For example, do you choose to act for the benefit of the whole group or to act selfishly? And this gets to the core idea from Greg's framework, which strategy wins is actually mostly not decided by the players of the game, but by the rules of the game, even though we often just blame the players or praise them for it.
So Greg Elliott's central claim is really a theory of evolution, take the same humans, change the conditions of the game, and suddenly different strategies start to win. And what he calls instrumental behavior is a strategy typically used by psychopaths. It loses badly in a certain kind of environment and wins in another. And once we lay this all out, Greg's framework points out seven conditions that held true during our crucible years as a species that have all been flipped the other way by scale, energy surplus and abstraction. And these are the settings of a system that decide what can happen within the system and he calls these boundary conditions. So today I'm going to parse these boundary conditions into seven dials, which can be turned up or down to change the incentives of a system and in turn what behaviors would lead to success.
And the short version of everything Greg and I talked about is that for 300,000 years, more or less cheating didn't pay. But in today's economic system, it does. And because over the last 10,000 years, seven dials got flipped, bringing us to the world we see today. Okay, I'm going to go into these one at a time. Dial one picture. Two restaurants, a mom and pop diner in a small town and a flashy restaurant on a busy highway. Same business, similar kinds of humans working in the kitchen. But the key difference is the people working at the diner are likely going to see their customers again in the near future. And the place on the interstate highway typically never sees its customers twice. You can already intuit which restaurant would get away with continually serving the so-so meal at a high price and get away with it.
The small town diner, which probably has better food with lower prices, doesn't have better or worse people. It's just playing a different game. So dial one, will I see you again? In ancestral times, the answer was later today for dinner. When we hunt, when we care for each other's children, when we play practical jokes, when we huddle around the campfire tonight and tell stories, every tribal interaction, was one move in a lifelong game that had thousands of moves. And the game theory winning strategy of tit for tat only works when there is a next round. Because helping others today pays off because they're probably going to help you, or at least they might help you in the future. But what if the dial turned off the repeated iteration setting?
And I'm never going to see this person again. So fast forward to today, our economic system rarely has consistent repeated interactions. Most of what we do in a normal course of daily life, at least in the global north, is with people we might never see again. The customer service representative, the internet forum we fill out and the like. And Greg told the story of his broker years, and I lived a similar story in the Chicago currency pits. My job was to extract the maximum spread from a client I would probably never meet. And I was taught the questions to ask, to figure out how much I could get away with. And on the podcast with Greg, I blurred it out. But they're teaching psychopathy, but but now I see really they were just teaching the game. So put simply the strategies that manipulate and take advantage of others in round one.
Never get punished in round two, because there is no round two. So the psychopathic instrumental strategy never fails. And it becomes cheaper and cheaper. So my angle on this is if you place it in the wide boundary context of the great simplification, cheap energy is largely responsible for this dial being flipped because it gives us a social reputational Mulligan. Cheap energy has been the get out of Seattle or Topeka or Toronto free card. And if you burn your relationships, you just fly somewhere else and start over. And at our tribal setting, the next round of interaction was guaranteed by close physical proximity. And now how much of our life repeats is mostly a function of how cheap it is to leave. And leaving has been very cheap for anti social actors on the upslope of the carbon pulse.
Okay, so how do we turn this dial back in the episode Greg mentioned moving towards smaller, more tightly coupled communities like cooperatives where you have repeated iterations with the same people again. And I would add suggestions like spend money where people know your name. And the mechanic and the local farmer as opposed to on platforms build for one off strangers and join things that have attendance or a league or a range or institutions whose entire function is actually scheduled repetition of meeting. And lastly, stay put on purpose, put down and deepen your roots where you already are. We get dial to visibility. You remember the one way mirrors in those interrogation rooms on police drama shows.
Someone's watching from the dark side and you can't see them. You can only see your reflection. We never think about it much, but in today's world, which side of that mirror do we live on? So dial to can everyone see what I did in our tribal setting back in the day when we lived with 50 to 150 people. And there were no walls or maybe some walls made of straw. If you hoarded something, someone saw. And if you lolligagged on a hunt, someone saw that. And reputation mattered and was visible and doing good for the tribe increased your status and causing harm led to consequences. Now the carbon pulse has not only brought social interaction Mulligans, but also extremes about visibility and invisibility. The system sees everything about you, your purchases, your location, your internet searches, and even what you hesitated over before you clicked to buy.
However, the people and entities that move things like our rent and our savings, pretty much operate through shell companies and fancy structures and closed doors meetings with people. We can never know the names of for the most part. And on the rare occasion, someone forces visibility. Greg mentioned the Panama papers. The system reacts like a body rejecting a splinter or something. And it's often the person who blew the whistle who ends up being punished. So what this does is in fact, individuals and social groups can't punish what they can't see. And the current game makes it hard for us to actually see bad actors. And to use my humans in humanity language from frankly number 108, the extreme tail among us is safe because the median human can't find it.
Let alone identify it. So in frankly 108, I said that non psychopaths have an advantage in that we can see more of reality because empathy is a sense organ. And when this dial is turned on, the visibility dial, we lose this advantage because we can no longer see them. So how do we turn this dial back? Greg's primary remedy was to increase transparency and attribution at the level of elites, which I think is a grand idea. But that direction, more transparency at the top, rather than more surveillance of everyone else, is the exact opposite of current trends, which is probably true for most of the recommendations I'll have on this list. So fund and support people that are forcing visibility upward, investigative journalism and protecting whistleblowers and the like fully open the books and anything you run and nonprofit a co-op, a budget for a town transparency starts in the institutions that you are already a part of.
Okay, dial three, you come back to your car in a parking lot and there is a dent in the door that wasn't there before version one, there is a note under your wiper with a name and a phone number and an apology and an acknowledgement of responsibility version two is no note same dent. This conjures a completely different feeling. So dial three does the harm have a name on it. Back in the planes of Africa, if you took my food, I actually watched you do it. And if we were attacked, we knew by who or by what? You knew the face that was harming you and you knew who it belonged to. And today, this strong attribution is hard to find as it's now filtered through technology and hierarchy and bureaucracy and the internet and the phone, which keeps ringing and digging, I'm trying to turn it off while I'm recording this.
It's beautiful and amazing on our end, but confoluted six continents supply chains means that we don't really know the human lives affected thousands of miles away or which river got poisoned and by who book from the factory waste for the coal ball that's in that phone. So corporations that externalize all the harms in our world out, compete the companies that include the externalities. And so those costs are still absorbed by the atmosphere, by communities and by unborn generations. The harm hasn't disappeared. Only the name responsible for it has. And so harm that is unnamed or doesn't have attribution is free to the people doing the harm.
So my angle on this dial is wide boundary versus narrow boundary. Narrow boundary is how you make a harm invisible and anonymous. A wide boundary is attribution at the civilizational scale. That's what the phrase is meant on this channel all along. So how do we dial it back related to the last one, try to shrink the world in which you buy and consume from food from a farmer's name on it means there's someone on the other side taking responsibility for it at the local scale and structurally and systemically and I worked on this 20 years ago at the Gund Institute at a for ecological economics true cost accounting or at least closer to the true cost on inputs. His is a direction full cost pricing is impossible inside the current system. But I think repricing is coming anyway as physics is going to do it for us. Okay dial for delay.
Back to our two restaurants for a second imagine one of the restaurants where the bill doesn't come for 50 years after you're finished eating and arrives at your grandchildren's table. So dial for when does the bill arrive back in hunter gather times if you slacked off on a hunt while your companions worked hard for the gazelle tenderloins. You wouldn't eat that night probably no romp in the bushes either. But today immediate feedback that our ancestors experience has morphed into significant delays in the consequences as real costs are diffused across geography and social bodies and future generations. And debt which I have a lot to say on in the near future means we can access and utilize resources earlier without realizing or feeling that there will be less in the future.
So complex climate systems mean the effects of our waste on the biosphere won't fully hit for decades or centuries. In other words summarizing this a bill that arrives late enough arrives to somebody else. And when feedback is delayed like this short time horizons plus a hunger for status plus low empathy that all becomes extremely adaptive and we're seeing this in real time. So I've I've talked about steep discount rates for 20 years of humans and human cultures. How much value we place on the present versus the future and this dial dictates how steep we can allow those rates and our current system values now above all no matter the future cost.
And it feels to me that this is accelerating. So how do we dial this one back. Greg advocated for shortening feedback loops. If someone causes harm there is meaningful and proportional accountability. But this style is different than the others as it will gradually then suddenly turn back on its own. As followers of this platform are aware of those bills that we mailed to the future the carbon the debt the drawdown aquifers the inequality all those things are starting to arrive. So my advice is short and feedback loops in your own life measure the things you depend on a soil local relationships energy water because these bills are coming either way you might as well know what's in them. A boring recommendation I know but on this one.
Many of them boring is kind of the point. Okay dial five mutual dependence. A hundred years ago where I live. Farmers couldn't harvest alone entire neighborhoods would share a single. Threshing machine and it moved from farm to farm. And their grain got harvested because the neighbors showed up and there's got harvested because you showed up. And cheap diesel at scale eventually brought every farm its own combine and machinery. And nobody needed anybody else. So dial five do we need each other in both directions. In ancestral times the answer to this was unequivocally yes pretty much nobody was replaceable the hunter needed to gatherer who needed the healer who needed the one person who knew where the water would be in a dry year and they all needed the shaman and the storyteller and dependence ran in all directions.
Today for the vast majority of us dependence runs one way we need the job but the job doesn't need us. Greg Elliott gave an example of the man who'd worked for 25 years at a company and his wife had cancer. He had two kids and a mortgage and car payments and none of that enters the calculus of his super organism counterpart. Is on the spreadsheet he is a headcount and eliminating his position improves the number. Greg used the word for this and trapment which is when one side's dependency continues to increase. Their strategy space then shrinks and leaving the relationship the economic situation the job the circumstance seems more costly than staying and it's quite a microcosm of our current global economy.
So my angle on this is energy slaves made humans replaceable and when approaching 20 terawatts of machines do most of the work the leverage of any one human starts to approach zero. The tribe needed you because there were limited people and survival depended on the unit on everyone contributing the super organism doesn't need you or me because there's a machine and a queue of people behind us. And soon to be armies of robots and cognitive slates in the form of large language models. I don't know if you've seen the Chinese robotics ceremonies from last week is quite scary. So how do we dial this back lots of suggestions here in trap men is how captured you feel by what you believe you can't afford to lose. So simplify first and beat the rush by lowering your own exit costs having more slack and less debt learn skills that are going to become needed where you live in your community.
Increasingly I have more mutual aid with more structure and we've talked about this before tool libraries and makerspaces and childcare co-ops and time banks and those sorts of things. And where you can decouple your survival and ability to thrive from the approval of any single institution using instrumental decision making dial six. If you grew up like I did you properly played driveway basketball or soccer with the neighbor kid who owned the ball. And somehow he was also the one who called the fouls. And we couldn't overrule him because the argument would end with the ball going home with him. So imagine the driveway is the economy dial six.
The most important one here I think is can anyone buy the rules before the agricultural revolution no one could own the rules nobody could store enough food or arm enough people to own the game. And the ontropological research shows things like ridicule and ostracism and coalitionary punishment and in the extreme case as read Maloy brought up on the psychopathy podcast execution became common. So rough equality of force was the guarantee more than any shared value was today one of the biggest learnings for me and Greg's podcast was that in tribal systems. It was extremely difficult to rewrite the rules but in what he calls today's symbolic systems winners of the game those who were able to accumulate large sums of money and power that's associated with it do have the ability to rewrite the rules up and the game board.
As we are seeing today at sufficient concentration the chips begin buying pieces of the game board itself. You acquire your competitors. You can own the entire chain the vertical and horizontal supply chain the infrastructure you can purchase information and data you can influence regulation. And you can survive symbolic losses that would bankrupt any individual normal. Non-secopathic human. The winners write the rules and then the rules eventually protect the winners which been a lot of media on that the last few years that I've kind of hand waved away and now I'm interested in learning about it. Because our ancient punishment capacity that we evolved with is completely gone.
You can't banish someone who owns the entire town. Notice the importance of dial six every suggested dial down or fix on the other dials is in the end. A rule that somebody would have to write an enforce so dial six is kind of the escape hatch for all the others. But right now. As we are increasingly feeling and seeing it is locked from the other side. That's why it gets a padlock on our on our panel here. So I have two thoughts here. First, nobody at any level of wealth can rewrite the laws of thermodynamics or ecology. Those are rule books that chips cannot buy. And they are soon going to be asserting themselves for everyone.
Second, in frankly one away that I've brought up a few times. I mentioned something called Punisher Fatigue where the sheriffs on social policing were burning out. And after hearing Greg and thinking about this last weekend, I realize it's because the sheriffs don't own the jail. It's not for many lack of of nerve or or constitution. So how do we dial this one down at this style? The scope unfortunately moves beyond us as individuals because no amount of shopping differently or not using XYZ product changes who writes the rules. So this lock on dial six is a central obstacle in the unfolding more than human predicament. But what's left to do still matters a great deal though.
The school board and the town council and the bylaws of your town and your co up. And things like that showing up is going to matter more now, not less as the big institutions consolidate. Because small boards where you can be in the room where the rules are still written by whoever shows up. That's going to matter and start to build the old tribal safeguards right into the bylaws like term limits and caps on how much power anyone person can hold and you rotate the leadership. You intentionally make a schedule to revisit decisions to make sure they're working and things like that. We've done this before by the way we humans. I learned recently that as elites fought over the scraps of the Western Roman Empire, the commons re-emerged in small pockets called monasteries.
Where small boards and co-ops and written rules and elected leadership and purposeful anticipated ahead of time mutual dependence. Carried things like literacy and agriculture and beer making through what was globally a 500 year contraction. And there are other historical examples. Okay, dial seven. Have you ever driven a vehicle that had a broken gas gauge? The needle says you have half a tank, but it also said that a few days ago. The needle is not the gasoline and you can tap on the glass and even move the needle with your fingers towards full. So it would any more gas in the tank. So dial seven is the number of fair proxy for the thing.
Back in the day of our ancestors, fitness was measured directly in their daily lives. You hunted and you found food and you defended yourself and you solved problems together with the tribe. If daily was 100% real. Today, our survival is routed through symbols. There are so many abstractions like markets and GDP and legal systems and religions and platforms and algorithms and other human created game boards. Between our actions and behaviors and our fitness, aka our well-being and life experience. This was one of Greg's main points. We live in an era where symbolic fitness is increasingly decoupled from actual fitness.
And the number moves differently than the thing it was meant to represent. Actually, often in the opposite direction of what it was meant to represent. We see this paradoxical example. GDP spikes after a storm destroys a coastal community. So the number is going up and the experience is the opposite. Fishery profits go up as they harvest the last cod. Yeah, there's lots of examples like that. And the numbers that measure success in our culture are disconnected from the physical reality and long-term consequences beneath. But our institutions and jobs are all shaped around making these symbolic numbers go up. And as such, all these functions and processes eventually harden into accounting principles and legal frameworks and the like.
So in our world, circa 2026, the symbol is no longer a tool. It has now become the game board itself. My take on this style is we still depend on the material world that our symbolic simulation sits on top of. Money is the symbol and energy materials and earth ecosystems are the things ultimately being represented. And this is the dial that makes the other six possible. You can't delay a consequence or anonymize damages or make dependence run one way without having some symbol that holds it in place. The symbol is the container. It is the way we write the rules that shape the rest of this story. How to dial this one down.
The heart-partis swallow is that eight billion people cannot be fed without these symbols. And we cannot turn it back at scale without massive change in chaos. But there's an important hygiene here. Keeping the symbol close to the physical reality at the smaller scales that we can. So in your own life, measure something real alongside the money, kilowatt hours of energy or bushels. Or the hours of your life spent per purchase of something. And also do things off the ledger entirely, barter and favors and Saturday potlucks and real reciprocal relationships. Just spend regular time in the real growing or fixing or making something. Not necessarily to save the planet, but as a visceral reminder of what these numbers stand for.
Okay. That was a lot, especially after last week's unexpected. I'm not sure if I'm going to be able to call bladder surgery, which I am recovering pretty well from. But I'm riding the surgery wave this year. Where does this leave us? One of these seven dials that's flipped from its ancestral setting would be a pain. It's a bad workplace, but all seven at once held in place by the sixth with a lock on it is a global economic super organism. You could also call it malloc or mumphurds the machine. But at the same time, at the level of your street or town or by our region or community, these dials are often still set the tribal way.
So many examples, flash your brights to someone you've never met or don't even know who's in the car. Are you returned to lost wallet? Happened to me in a mall in Finland. You show up with a chicken alking, a casserole, lots of other behaviors. That I think a lot of you instantly recognize. But at the super organism scale, every one of those is flipped. And that is why you can feel like a decent person inside in decent system. Because you are one. You might be wondering whether the great simplification on the horizon turns these dials back for us. Some of them probably, but not the one with the lock. Which brings me to some questions that I want to leave you with. Which of these dials is flipped in your life in our situation today?
And is it one that you could turn back even partially by hand? Is the cooperation and reciprocity in your life of the genuine altruistic kind or of the entrapped kind? If the roughly 30 million clinical psychopaths in the world disappeared tomorrow, would any of these dials move? In Game Theory, Hawks beat Doves one-on-one and Dove groups beat Hawk groups. And that second thing has been switched off in our society at scale. Does the great simplification switch it back on? Or do we have to? Lastly, can the good guys ever win? And if you come to believe the answer is no, can you still be a good guy or gal anyway?
And if the answer to that is yes, why? I learned from this conversation with Greg Elliott and his work and it really explains the software of the superorganism. And part of my theory of change is hoping the global TGS community, who increasingly understands this stuff, is going to come up with emergent responses to all this where they live. Much more to say on this. I hope this was helpful. I'm continuing to roll these ideas and questions around in my head. See you next week. .
More episodes
More from The Great Simplification with Nate Hagens

The Collapse of Our Mythology: Can Humanity Choose What's Next? with Charles Eis...
The Great Simplification with Nate Hagens

Just Stop Oil!?: The Economic Foundation We Ignore | Frankly Archives 39 (2023)
The Great Simplification with Nate Hagens

The Psychopathic Selection Hypothesis: The Rules of the Game Keep Us Trapped wit...
The Great Simplification with Nate Hagens

An Antidote to Despair: What Dogs Reveal About the Metacrisis | Frankly 156
The Great Simplification with Nate Hagens