
Trump v. CASA: The Case of Universal Injunctions
About this episode
On the last day of the 2024-25, the Supreme Court issued its decision in Trump v. CASA, involving the validity of universal injunctions. By a 6-3 vote, the Court granted the Trump administration’s request to limit the availability of such injunctions in a case in which the plaintiffs challenged the legality of President Trump’s executive order limiting birthright citizenship. CASA may seem like a somewhattechnical case about equitable remedies, but in fact CASA tells us a great deal about the current Supreme Court, especially regarding its views on presidential power and separation of powers in a time of political and legal transition. Jessica Silbey, Associate Dean and Professor of Law at Boston University School of Law, discusses CASAwith Associate Dean Rodger Citron on this Touro Law Review podcast.
Get every episode summarized
Each time Touro Law Review Podcast publishes, we email you a written briefing from the transcript — the topics, who appeared, and any specific claims, with the ad reads skipped.
Email me new episodesFree for 3 shows. No card needed.
Hosts & guests
No transcript yet
This episode has not been transcribed. Request it and it moves to the front of the queue.
More episodes
More from Touro Law Review Podcast

All Hail Hanna: Berk v. Choy and Choosing Between Federal and State Law
Touro Law Review Podcast

The President's Removal Power: A Discussion with Professor Ilan Wurman
Touro Law Review Podcast

Congress, the President, and Tariffs: Learning Resources, Inc. v. Trump at the S...
Touro Law Review Podcast

Law in Literature: The Case of Hollow Spaces
Touro Law Review Podcast