Skip to content
TrackPodcasts
newsMar 15, 202628:53

Trump Dog-Walked Into Nuclear War by Netanyahu to Commit More Genocide

IHIP News

About this episode

We are joined by Dr. Marc Lamont Hill to talk about Trump, Netanyahu, and their war mongering bases.


Order our new book, join our Substack, shop our merch, and more by clicking here: https://linktr.ee/ivehaditpodcast.

See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

Get every episode summarized

Each time IHIP News publishes, we email you a written briefing from the transcript — the topics, who appeared, and any specific claims, with the ad reads skipped.

Email me new episodes

Free for 3 shows. No card needed.

Hosts & guests

Transcript ready

408 searchable segments. Every word is indexed and playable.

Trump Dog-Walked Into Nuclear War by Netanyahu to Commit More Genocide

IHIP News

0:00
28:53

Full transcript

IHIP NewsTrump Dog-Walked Into Nuclear War by Netanyahu to Commit More Genocide. Machine-transcribed; use the interactive transcript above to jump the player to any line.

Donald Trump and Benjamin Netanyahu are committing war crime after war crime after war crime. And the question is why. And so I have an expert on to educate all of us and give us some insight. Let's welcome Dr. Mark Lamont Hill. He has a PhD from Penn, casual and as an anthropologist and scholar of the Middle East and Palestine. He's also an expert on the political relationship between Israel and the United States. And according to his t-shirt today, he's also extra black. That's right. Every day. Welcome. Good to see you. Thank you for having me. Good to see you too. So what I am seeing are war crimes. I am seeing schools bombed. I'm seeing people breathe in toxic rain. I'm seeing hospitals bombed. And this seems to be a feature, not a bug of IDF military operations. Please enlighten me on what we're all seeing here. Well, well, first I'm glad you pointed out the feature piece of it because that's exactly

what's happening. It's happening in Iran right now. It happened in Gaza. It happens in the West Bank in a slightly different way. But ultimately, there is a very particular approach that the Israeli Army takes to military action. And it's one of overkill. For years, in Gaza, for example, what we saw was the IDF engaging in what they called, their words not mine, mowing the law, which referred to periodic military operations and military strikes that would deplete the population slightly, but also instilled a certain kind of fear in the population about what resistance would look like. In October 7th of 2023, we saw something much bigger, something devastating. We saw an actual genocide and we saw the destruction of hospitals, schools, cemeteries, anything that makes a society a society in any semblance of civil society destroyed. And the argument always is, look at them.

They're so violent. They're so dangerous. They pose such a threat, a non-stop threat that we have to be thorough in our destruction in order to save ourselves. It's like back in the day, although you're clearly too young to remember this, when Rodney King was getting beaten, and it's like five cops beating up, beating up Rodney King. I know it's five or one, but if he had gotten up, you know, you don't know what he would have done to us, you know, because of all the PCP and all the other stereotypes they have about black people. It's a very similar thing here. These crazy Palestinians, these crazy Arabs, if we were to not do this thoroughly, look what they would do to us. Now when you transpose that over to what's happening in Iran right now, it's a very similar ongoing narrative. They pose an existential threat to us. They're always looking to destroy us. They're always enriching your reign. They're always trying to build a nuclear bomb to get rid of us. And looking what they've always done, this sort of fake appeal to history, and in doing so, they make us, meaning, and I say us right now in the United States, they make us the

good guys. They make Israel the good guys, and they make anybody over there, whether it's Syria, Iraq, Lebanon, Palestine, they make them the bad guy, but also justified. Okay, let's talk about the patronizing propaganda that is used by Benjamin Netanyahu. We've all seen this hyperclip for 40 years. They're going to have a nuke, debt to America, debt to Israel, they're going to have a nuke, they're going to have a nuke, they're going to have a nuke. And we see that, and then we see our president has a sane sentence, and he's like, oh, we demolished all of their potential nuke things, this is like a month ago or whatever. And then BB, dog walks, Trump into this thing, and then they're like, oh, they were going to have a nuke. And it's just the stupidity in which they think the audience receives their information that is not only dangerous, but also insulting. And this propaganda that they use, and I have fallen prey to it, Dr. Hill, I really, I have fallen prey to it before.

But what I've really woken up to is that this whole notion that Israel's this great democracy and the Palestinians, they will throw gay people off a roof, and then I'm like, you're fucking killing gay Palestinians. So what kind of democracy do you have? What kind of democracy is that? Do you follow zero rule of law? And then they keep electing Benjamin Netanyahu, and so is it a cultural problem over there where everybody's so propagandized for all of this violence? It's a good question. I think there are a few things happening. One, we're all propagandized. You're not the only one who falls victim to it. I remember being a kid growing up in the 80s and 90s watching the WWF, watching from the moment the Iron Sheik wins the title by stealing it from Bob Backlin, you know, which happens right at the time of the 1979, you know, the Ronnie Revolution.

And Hulk Hogan comes and saves the day, and he's a real American, and there's Sergeant Slotter and Hulk Hogan and the Iron Sheik and Nikolai, well, from the moment that happens, we're taught to look at different countries, different ethnicities, different identities, differently, whether it's the Rocky movies, whether I mean, you can look at, we're all socialized, right? When you add that to news media, which for years didn't even want to say the name or the word Palestinian, they were just Arabs. Do you see the kind of passing jokes on TV shows that I love, like the Golden Girls, you know, where they're making PLO jokes, you know, anti-PLO jokes, right? There's a way they were all kind of socialized. Then when you add that to the political narratives, it gets very, very dangerous. This idea that the U.S. wants peace and the brown people always want war, that they're always perpetually, perennially, and preternatially violent. They can't help but be violent. All they do is fight, and that's all they've ever done. This becomes the narrative. And I think Israeli society buys into that narrative, the same way American society, a

French society, a German society buys into that narrative. However, I do think it's a little more complicated, and I think there's a little less room for grace at times. When you go to places like Jerusalem, where I spent the last decade or so doing research, I see settlers taking people's homes. I see settlers saying, look, if I don't take the home, someone else is, so why not me? That's not an abstract narrative. I understand that this home belongs to a Palestinian, and now it does not, because of the choice that I'm making. So I don't want to let them off the hook. You know, people say, I hear Bernie Sanders say this all the time. You know, I don't support Netanyahu's right wing agenda. That's a way of framing the problem in Israel as a problem of Netanyahu. And that's not enough. Netanyahu is a jerk, sure. Netanyahu, when he gets out of office, may walk into a prison cell because of crimes he's committed. Netanyahu is a warmager when it comes to Israel.

Netanyahu and Trump make the perfect bromance because they're the same person. We get it, but Israeli society is structured in a way that produces inequality. It's not a Netanyahu state. It's an apartheid state. There are people who get different rules and rights, levels of access based on whether or not they're one identity or another. That is the problem with Israeli society. It's not a problem of leadership. If you brought in the most progressive leader ever, if the society stays the same, if we continue to have admissions councils in places like the Galilee where even black and brown Jews can't live in the same neighborhood necessarily, if they don't fit the culture and social fabric of society, if we have places like the West Bank and East Jerusalem and Gaza, which are walled off from the actual Israeli state, again, that some people have citizenship other people do not. People talk about two state solutions, but it's a one state reality right now where Israel

controls everything. They control the West Bank. They control Gaza. They control East Jerusalem and yet Palestinians don't have equal rights. That is a fundamental problem. And right before October 7th, people said, oh, but the Israeli people were sticking up for themselves. They were marching in the streets to fight Netanyahu and that's true. And the liberal Zionist wing of Israel said, absolutely, we don't like what he's trying to do with the courts. We don't like what he's doing with the society, but they were fighting for more democracy among the people who they wanted to give democracy to. It's no different than fighting to keep us, it'd be no different than the North in times of slavery saying, look, we're going to, or rather the South saying, like, we're going to continue to fight. We want to hold onto the South. We want the South to be fair. We want everybody to have a vote, not the enslaved people, but everybody else. And we're going to fight to make sure that women have a right, but not those black women. That's what's happening right now. They were fighting for a liberal Zionist vision, not a democratic vision. Okay. So you speak about Trump and Netanyahu being perfect bromance, not strange bellow, bedfellows,

perfect, bedfellows. And you speak about if Netanyahu dropped to dead or goes to prison, you still have a cultural problem. And I think in the United States, if Trump dropped dead or goes to prison, we still have a cultural problem. But what I see is the through line that a lot of Americans need to wake up to is you talk about apartheid in Israel, but let's talk about apartheid in the United States. Let's talk about the fact that just recently when white women and men that look like me saw Renee Good and Alex Freddie shot, they were like, oh my God, they are out of control. They are just over policing and just shooting innocent people. But the lesson for Americans is black people have been telling us this for decades. And we are dismissive. We seed ground to right wing media in that, oh, you know, you shouldn't have resisted a rest and all of the propaganda surrounding this.

My husband's a criminal defense attorney and there's no question. We have a two tier justice system. He has a client who was serving crazy amounts of time, a black man for crack cocaine, life sentence on top of life, sentence on top of life sentence that would never happen to a white man. So is this a through line in Israeli society and American society that we all need to wake up to in order to get beyond this when we do an autopsy and what led us into fascism? It started long before the incubation of all of this moment started long before that idiotic man came down the escalator. Please speak to that. I'm so glad you said that. I mean, again, this stuff is in the DNA of the nation. This nation was created on inequality. This nation was created on the exploitation and extraction of black labor and this idea to your cultural point that it's normal and that it's natural and that it makes sense.

Of course, black people should be doing this. Of course, black people shouldn't be provided access to the same rights and privileges, etc., etc. And it lingers on until this day. And so when you talk about what happened to Renee Good, when you talk about the kind of moral panic and outrage that people saw when that white woman was killed, that is always what happens in this society. I think about when John F. Kennedy walks through Harlem in 1960 holding up a black baby and they dismiss it as a campaign stunt, they saw it as kind of cheap liberal political theater. Like Bill Clinton playing the saxophone on our city of hall or Hillary Clinton in a church in Selma trying to clap on beat, it's like this is what we do to make people happy. But you juxtaposed that to Bobby Kennedy walking through West Virginia. He's in Appalachia holding up white babies, his belly's bloated, he's, he's crying, it's not coming out of his nose. That image very quickly becomes the image for the war on poverty because white misery is

less tolerable in this country. White pain is less tolerable in this country. When my uncles and aunts and cousins were getting locked up for crack quite literally, like no one was bugging out about it. In fact, we made laws and fake science to justify the arrest. Like you talked about the crack cocaine differential, powder cocaine differential. That's one piece of it. And then again, the logic of the crack head versus the cocaine, right? Your cocaine could be a cool frat boy. Your accountant could even be a coke head. Your stock broker. Give me your stock broker. Your doctor. Exactly. But no one says, you know, I got a great accountant. He's on crack. You can go to him, you know, we don't do it even though they're the same drug. We make mythologies around it to justify the differences. And so we're always trying to justify inequality through science, through media, through pop culture, through all these representations. And so when we see a white woman killed in the street, in the very same way, there's so many black and brown people who have been killed in the street protesting in Ferguson,

protesting in Minneapolis, protesting, you know, in Sanford, Florida, you know, we're just reenacting a very old American tradition. And that's the exact same thing to your point that's happening in Israel. That's the exact same thing. Yeah. I've been thinking a lot about this as I've kind of weaned off of a corporate news diet after the last election. And really trying to educate myself more and more and becoming a more, I've always been an independent thinker. I was a progressive person in the Bible belt. But I've trying to become even more and more educated off of this corporate diet. As you open up your eyes to the Israel influence in the United States government, it's a minefield at first when I, because I started to tip toe out into it. And it's like, oh, she's an anti-Semi. And so this idea that they weaponize something that ultimately endangers Jewish people worldwide,

using something so haphazardly. And all actuality war crimes and aggressions must be criticized. We must as just people stand up regardless of who is getting killed. You know, I remember I come from a line of progressives. I remember when George W. Bush attacked Iraq, my mother and I were on the phone and I had little young boys at the time I'm saying, you know, Jennifer, she's from Texas. She said, darling, I just feel so bad for these Iraqis too. You know, they didn't want any of this and Bush is bombing the wrong damn country. If this woman, you know, Nesha lives in Oklahoma city, but if she could figure that out and she sees the humanity and other people and this quantifying of which lives matter and which lives don't is constantly a through line. But let's get back to the influence that Israel has over both parties. This was a real eye opening thing for me. And when I realized that a pat gave Donald Trump just about as much money as Elon musted.

But they also own Chuck Schumer and Hawking Jeffries. The betrayal that I feel about that and then you realize, oh, that's why we don't have an opposition party because they're paid controlled opposition. Speaking about this, your knowledge about this inside me and my listeners about this duplicity. Yeah, it's a great question. And I wrote a book called Except for Palestine, the limits of progressive politics, precisely for this reason, along with my friend and brother Mitchell Plitnik. The reason we wrote the book was precisely for this point. There are lots of progressives out there, lots of progressives out there who don't support indiscriminate bombing, who will call themselves anti-imperialists, who support free speech, et cetera, et cetera, et cetera, you can go on down the list. But there's always the progressive exception, and I'm putting that in quotes for Palestine, because you can't really be progressive and except for Palestine.

And the reason is multiple. One, again, is the misinformation that we've been fed for years. If we've been fed that the struggle of Israel and Palestine is a struggle solely about Jewish self-determination and Jewish self-defense, then, of course, you'll support Israel's right, right? Even the framing of the conversation, do you support Israel's right to exist? It's like, what does that mean? Of course, we support Jewish people's right to exist, and Israelis right to exist as human beings. No one should live without safety, dignity, self-determination, justice, et cetera. Everybody deserves that with no exceptions. But too often, the right to exist when you unpack it really means the right to exist as an apartheid state. It means the right to exist on our terms. Countries don't have a right to exist. People do. And we have to, but that language is only used for Israel. If you were to ask Chuck Schumer, do you support communist China's right to exist?

You know, he would fumble around and ignore you and walk away. If you said, do we support Iran's right to exist? Well, you know, what would he say? Right? So what does it mean to support a nation's state's right to exist? And so for me, it's not a very helpful question, but it's part of how we've been tricked. You know, many black Americans have been told that we have a kind of duty to support Israel because of Jewish Americans support of us during the civil rights struggle. And while our Jewish brothers and sisters were quite supportive of us during the struggle for civil rights here in the United States, the way we repay them properly is to fight for justice everywhere, including to protect the rights of Jewish people. The rights of Jewish people are not protected by building an apartheid state in the Middle East. The rights of Jewish people are protected by ensuring that their safety, dignity, and self-determination for Jewish people everywhere that does not come at the expense of anyone else's. That has to be key. The other piece of this, because I don't want to make everybody this innocent patsy who just got misrepresented, is the cynical part, right?

There are people who are very intentional in framing any critique of Israel as an act of anti-semitism, any challenge of Zionism as an act of anti-semitism. And in fact, part of what's happened over the last century is that Zionism has been conflated with Judaism, and so that to be Jewish is now understood to be a Zionist in the minds of some people. And so any attack on Israel or any criticism of Israel as a nation state, the same way we criticize the policies of any nation is seen as anti-Jewish. I mean, can you imagine if I were to criticize Saudi Arabia, which I do all the time, if I were to criticize Saudi Arabia, and I was called an Islamofilb as such, just because I'm criticizing the kingdom of Saudi, or if I'm criticizing Iranian regime, is that making me anti-Shi'i? It's not a fair or principled position to take as a dishonest one, but it's been codified in law. The International Holocaust Remberance Alliance has a definition

of anti-semitism, which is intentionally broad. It was never intended to be law, but it's very broad, very vague and very dangerous. So what Congress has done among other institutions, including the federal government, is adopt the IHRA definition of anti-semitism, which says that if I were to criticize Israel, that would make me anti-semitic. If I were to compare Israel and the regime of violence and ethnic cleansing and etc., if I were to compare it to St. Nazi Germany, as some people do, that's not my comparison. It's honestly, now I'm not afraid to make comparisons. That's just not mine. But for people who make that comparison, they're saying that is definitionally anti-semitic. I say, y'all have that debate about whether it is or it's not like Nazi Germany, but it doesn't make you anti-semitic to have the conversation if you're basing it on the evidence, but there's no room to bring out the evidence. And then there's the last part, and this is, I definitely saved the biggest for last. And that's the money. The lobby money, it'd be very clear, the lobbying money. I'm not suggesting that there's some

anti, that there's some cabal of power. I'm not suggesting that Jewish money is doing anything. Those are anti-semitic tropes and slurs and very dangerous. We have to reject those. We have to analyze Israel on the same terms that we analyze every other country. We shouldn't hold Israel to a lower standard and we shouldn't hold Israel to a higher standard. And I'm saying that in the same way that there's a done lobby, in the same way that there's a pro-life lobby, there is very clearly an Israel lobby. And that Israel lobby makes sure that candidates on both sides of the aisle have a certain position, the same way we can't get gun reform. Because both sides have our in our aid of the wazoo, we often can't get any meaningful progressive policy on Israel's Palestine because both sides, Democrat and Republican are apact up the wazoo. And when you look at Hillary Clinton stand on stage against Donald Trump, she's clearly the superior opponent. She's clearly the superior candidate. She's smart of him. She's dancing

circles around him on every topic. She has a different analysis and a different solution until you get to Israel. And then suddenly they're literally reading the same talking points. I couldn't tell on a transcript who was who. The same thing happens when Joe Biden takes the stage. The same thing happens when Hakeem Jeffrey speaks. The same thing happens when Chuck Schumer speaks. It's not a cool incident. It's a, when Cory Booker. I mean, what are we talking about? I mean, it's absurd. And it's frustrating to see, um, in fact, I would just say, and just to circle back to the anti-Semitism thing, we do need to fight anti-Semitism. We need to dismantle anti-Semitism everywhere it emerges around the globe. That is a non-starter to say it is a non-starter to say, we'll wait on the Jewish question or we'll wait on the anti-Semitism question. No, it's urgent and it's primary. Jewish rights should never take a back seat. We must always, always fight for Jewish rights and fight against anti-Semitism everywhere around the globe.

But there is nothing more anti-Semitic than to attach the violence and the rogue nature of statecraft that we see coming from Netanyahu to look at the, the ethnic cleansing of Palestinians, to look at decades of displacement, decades of violation of international law, decades of illegal military occupation. There is nothing more anti-Semitic than to look at all of that stuff and attach that to the beautiful, wonderful, sacred tradition of Judaism. Judaism ain't got nothing to do with this. This is a nation that's doing bad stuff just like the U.S. does bad stuff in New Zealand, does bad stuff in Australia, does bad stuff in Canada, does bad stuff. We have to be able to hold Israel accountable to have an honest conversation that will ultimately make Jews safer and make all of us a little more free. Okay, final question. Speaking of what is anti-Semitic, I grew up in the Bible Bell. I don't live there any longer. I just recently moved to New York, but a lot, and I was an atheist, raised by atheists, really weird upbringing in the Bible Bell.

But a lot of my friends that my peers in high school and junior high were rapture preppers, and they want the, like Ted Cruz, Lady Graham. They want the Jews to be in Israel, kind of like places, please. Yes. And then Jesus comes down and sends them to hell. Yes. Most inversions in death. And then they're lecturing us about bigotry and it's just so rich and so inherently demeaning to Jewish people. And I also think this is the most co-opted group in America. Trump was able to call Fallwell Jr. Get the Evangelical vote. Netanyahu is now investing in this group of white evangelical Christians to bring them over to Israel and use them. And just last question, just speak to that dynamic of Christian Zionism playing such a huge role in this, and kind of emotionally blackmailing, you know, we're accused of virtue signaling.

I accused MAGA of Christian signaling. They weaponized their faith in Christian signal all the time. And this is a central part feature of this Iranian war, end of times, apocalyptic freak show they're all into. I mean, you just used all the perfect words to describe it. I mean, this is the Christian nationalism is deeply dangerous, deeply racist, deeply anti-Semitic. Many of the people who are supporting Netanyahu from the White House, from the State House and from Congress are people who hate Jews and love Israel. They're very few people more deeply anti-Semitic. I have found in these MAGA people, but they still want to support Israel why for the reason you just gave, because it fits into their vision of the eschatine of Christian eschatology or what the end of days looks like. As you said, they think that Jesus only comes back when Israel's rebuilt. And so even though

the biblical Israel both geographically and structurally, etc., is not the Israel of today, the nation-state built in 1948, they want to believe that because they believe that if Israel's rebuilt, then Jesus will come back. And yes, for those of you who are receiving the support of these evangelicals, watch the end of the play. It doesn't work out well for you, for Jewish brothers and sisters, right? The idea of Jesus coming back and people are either forcefully converted or killed that narrative itself is deeply anti-Semitic. Yes, I think so too. Yes, it absolutely is, but it's not, I don't want us to infantilize or underestimate the intelligence of our Jewish brothers and sisters. They know that, but they also know the evangelicals are foolish, they don't believe it. So they're like, whatever it will take, whatever it takes to get the support, you can believe your wacky evangelical theories all you want. Just keep the funding coming, keep the support coming, keep the diplomatic cover coming, keep those votes coming in the

U.N. Security Council to veto votes. Do all the things that allow Israel to build itself in row, and we don't give a damn if you continue to believe in this wacky stuff, but to wield that as some kind of moral cudgel against us to say, well, we're taking the principle, we're Christians, and we believe in Jesus, and we believe in Israel, and we believe in the God of the Bible, all that Mike Huckabee bullshit, right? Do you use the technical term? If that's what you're using as your moral, as Mark of moral superiority, then I say, I feel very good about where I stand, Marla, in relation to that, because you all don't give a damn of a Palestinian, you don't give a damn about the love ethic of Jesus, you don't give a damn about loving the least of these, which is that baby in Gaza right now. You don't give a shit about poor people in Arkansas. None of it. None of it. All they want you to do is support Israel and give birth to babies that we won't take care of once they're born and continue to build a capitalist empire that looks nothing like the

vision of the world that their beloved Jesus talked about. Yeah, I completely agree. I mean, Dr. Marclamont, I've loved this so much. I want to have you back on. Thank you for your expertise. Thank you for your insight. We'd love to have you back on I have news. I would love to be back on. I just want to tell people I have a a Patreon. You can visit your Patreon where I have an account, a network. In fact, when we talk about all these issues in great detail, everything from politics to pop culture, we tie all the all the ends together and make it plain for you. Is it just Dr. Mark Lamont Hill? Yep, you're going to picture on your fine Mark Lamont Hill official network. It's right there. Love it. All right. We'll see you soon.

More episodes

More from IHIP News

View all episodes →