About this episode
Caleb Watney (Institute for Progress) and Max Bodach (Foundation for American Innovation) on what the new breed of DC think tanks does differently and why the old model is broken.
We discuss:
Why "counterfactual policy impact" matters more than white papers and what's wrong with project-based funding
Cross-partisanship vs. picking sides: IFP pulls the rope sideways, FAI builds a big tent on the right
Vertical integration over specialization — the person who wrote the brief should be the one selling it on the Hill
Whether AI eats the think tank or just the parts that weren't working anyway
Timestamps
00:38 — Applied think tank vs. white paper mill
16:56 — Partisanship: FAI's conservative tent vs. IFP's cross-partisan design
37:09 — Why researchers should do their own comms and outreach
50:26 — Betting on young talent as policy entrepreneurs
57:56 — Will AI eat the think tank?
song: https://suno.com/s/I244K1rIpPdB6lO9
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
Get every episode summarized
Each time ChinaTalk publishes, we email you a written briefing from the transcript — the topics, who appeared, and any specific claims, with the ad reads skipped.
Email me new episodesFree for 3 shows. No card needed.
Hosts & guests
No transcript yet
This episode has not been transcribed. Request it and it moves to the front of the queue.
More episodes
