
The Supreme Court Takes Up Two Cases That Could Transform the Internet
About this episode
On Monday, the U.S. Supreme Court agreed to hear two cases that concern whether tech platforms can be held liable for user generated content, as well as for content that users see because of a platform’s algorithmic systems. In deciding to hear Gonzalez et al vs. Google and Taamneh, Mehier et al vs Twitter et al, the Court will broach the question of whether Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act should be narrowed, and whether it still immunizes the owners of websites when that algorithmically “recommend” third-party content into a user’s feed.
To learn more about these cases and the potential implications of the Court’s decision, Tech Policy Press spoke to an expert on tech and internet law: Anupam Chander, the Scott K. Ginsberg Professor of Law and Technology at Georgetown University.
Get every episode summarized
Each time The Tech Policy Press Podcast publishes, we email you a written briefing from the transcript — the topics, who appeared, and any specific claims, with the ad reads skipped.
Email me new episodesFree for 3 shows. No card needed.
No transcript yet
This episode has not been transcribed. Request it and it moves to the front of the queue.
More episodes
More from The Tech Policy Press Podcast

AI Governance Reaches Crisis Point Ahead of Trump-Xi Summit
The Tech Policy Press Podcast

Across the US, School Districts Wrestle With Classroom AI Policy
The Tech Policy Press Podcast

Rep. Zoe Lofgren on FISA, Surveillance and the Fourth Amendment
The Tech Policy Press Podcast

Virginia Eyes AI Chatbot Rules as Observable Risks Warrant Action
The Tech Policy Press Podcast