
The Supreme Court Case That Could End Racial Gerrymandering Requirements
About this episode
One of the surprising aspects of the American electoral system is that while regular gerrymandering is frowned upon, racial gerrymandering is actually required by law. Meaning that if you redraw a congressional district to benefit your political party, you might get criticized for it, but that’s about all. Under certain circumstances, however, if you redraw a state’s congressional districts and don’t go out of your way to give more weight to minorities, then that is actually illegal. Essentially, states have to consider race when apportioning their congressional districts.
At least, they have to for now—because it looks like the U.S. Supreme Court is poised to change this soon.
Let’s go through the details together.
Get every episode summarized
Each time Facts Matter publishes, we email you a written briefing from the transcript — the topics, who appeared, and any specific claims, with the ad reads skipped.
Email me new episodesFree for 3 shows. No card needed.
Hosts & guests
No transcript yet
This episode has not been transcribed. Request it and it moves to the front of the queue.
More episodes
More from Facts Matter

New Bill Would Create 'Dark Skies' Rules in NY, Force State to Go Dark After 11P...
Facts Matter

Federal Judge Strips Chinese Couple of US Citizenship for Stealing Sensitive Sec...
Facts Matter

2 Middle School Brothers' 'Let's Go Brandon' Hoodie Case Goes to Supreme Court
Facts Matter

After Virginia Bill Passes, Compact to Eliminate Electoral College is Now 82 Per...
Facts Matter