Sep 16, 201239:16pending
The No Alternatives Argument
About this episode
Jan Sprenger (Tilburg) gives a talk at the 9th Formal Epistemology Workshop (Munich, May 29–June 2, 2012) titled "The No Alternatives Argument" (joint work with Richard Dawid and Stephan Hartmann). Abstract: Scientific theories are hard to find, and once scientists have found a theory H, they often believe that there cannot be many distinct alternatives to H. But is this belief justied? What should scientists believe about the number of alternatives to H, and how should they change these beliefs in the light of new evidence? These are some of the questions that we will address in this paper. We also ask under which conditions failure to find an alternative to H confirms the theory in question. This kind of reasoning (which we call the no alternatives argument) is rather popular in science and therefore deserves a careful philosophical analysis.
Get every episode summarized
Each time MCMP – Mathematical Philosophy (Archive 2011/12) publishes, we email you a written briefing from the transcript — the topics, who appeared, and any specific claims, with the ad reads skipped.
Email me new episodesFree for 3 shows. No card needed.
Hosts & guests
No transcript yet
This episode has not been transcribed. Request it and it moves to the front of the queue.
More episodes
More from MCMP – Mathematical Philosophy (Archive 2011/12)
Modality and Categories
MCMP – Mathematical Philosophy (Archive 2011/12)
Apr 22, 20191:01:52pending
Adaptive Logics: Introduction, Applications, Computational Aspects and Recent De...
MCMP – Mathematical Philosophy (Archive 2011/12)
Apr 22, 20191:18:33pending
Belief Dynamics under Iterated Revision: Cycles, Fixed Points and Truth-tracking
MCMP – Mathematical Philosophy (Archive 2011/12)
Apr 20, 20191:19:40pending
Tracking the Truth Requires a Non-wellfounded Prior!
MCMP – Mathematical Philosophy (Archive 2011/12)
Apr 20, 20191:31:54pending