The iilluminaughtii Situation Gets Worse… | Internet Anarchist

0:00The horrific downfall of Illuminati will be studied for years to come, from being a respected YouTuber with over a million subscribers to becoming one of the most hated creators in YouTube history. Since uploading my last two videos on her, which amassed 4 million views collectively, a lot has changed. She's been exposed by Penguin Zero, abandoned her YouTube channel, and is possibly running a secret channel. Hi, I'm the internet anarchist. I create weekly YouTube documentaries, and today we'll be looking to the aftermath and most recent updates surrounding Illuminati, aka Blair. Up until March 2023, Blair enjoyed a successful career on YouTube, averaging roughly 8 million views per month, and amassing over 1.7 million subscribers in her prime. However, all came crumbling down when she began to show her true colors. After idiotically starting a drama with legal eagle over a ledge-stolen editing styles, viewers began to look deeper into her history, and what they found was more but to say the least. Distain on her otherwise

1:00good image gave the confidence to others who were affected by her obsessive and manipulative behavior to speak out, with allegations ranging from legal threats and attempts at censoring other creators to manipulating her employee into signing himself into debt with her. This would not only lead to me creating two videos breaking down the situation, but also a video by the most popular YouTube commentator, Pinguin Zero, who would eventually create a video of his own to shed light on a problematic behavior and downfall. Throughout the video, Charlie would share her drama with legal eagle as well as cover her general downfall story. I've never seen a channel go from as popular she is to where she is. I know it started when she accused legal eagle of plagiarizing her editing style, got biblically clowned on for it, and then from there a ton of people came forward revealing how toxic and mean she is behind the scenes, but other than that I haven't dove into

2:03like the five or six hours worth of cumulative trash she has done. However, Charlie would also make one key prediction on the future of her career. I think Illuminati will continue this trajectory for maybe six more months tops. After that she's going to start another channel using an AI voice model in order to keep doing these same kind of videos but start fresh and hope and hope people don't connect her to it. With Charlie's prediction in mind, let's take a look at what actually happened to her channel. From the moment Blair posted her widely criticized apology video, her channel began to deteriorate rapidly. Although the video was intended to address the controversy and clearer name, it was perceived as insincere and deflective, failing to address the core issues raised by her critics. This poor response significantly damaged her reputation, alienating a large portion of her audience who gave her the benefit of the doubt. Despite attempting to maintain a regular upload schedule, her content quality and viewership were clearly in decline. Video is at once easily garnered 300,000 views, struggled to break 30k, and the comment section of

3:06her videos became full of criticism until she decided to turn off comments altogether. To make matters even worse, the dislike to like ratio on her videos further displayed what the YouTube community thought about her existing on the platform. Many of her remaining viewers watched out of curiosity rather than genuine interest, waiting to see if she would address the ongoing criticism. However, on the 16th of February 2024, she published her final video, marking over 100 days since her last upload. Numerous YouTubers have since speculated that Blad finally abandoned her channel and left it in the dust, but that doesn't mean she's become inactive in other areas. Despite Blad destroying her career with her own actions, she still blames others for what happened, and currently seeks revenge by any means necessary. Thanks to the YouTuber Mad Catstar, we'd get a glimpse of how far Blad was willing to go to get her revenge. Around December 2023, when Blair was trying to foreclose on Osmedia's home, she also filed a lawsuit against him, one-destruct, and Felix the Kit Kat, an individual she once hired to dig up dirt on the click,

4:09and later hired. The basis of the lawsuit was that these three individuals had somehow breached a confidentiality agreement while underblays employment, and were now defaming her. In the amended version, Blad's attorney wrote, all the defendant's confidentiality agreements contain language pertaining to the employees' understanding that by entering the confidentiality agreements, they obligated to and plaintiff's goal is to protect his confidential property information, and ensure that all employees agree to maintain confidentiality of redacted information. The document mostly recounted Blad's history with all the defendants, and stated that their videos or information shared about her, were defamatory, and had damaged her company. In Felix's case, he'd only shared screenshots about what Blad had asked him to do, but that was enough for Blad to maliciously sue him. With the document reading, regarding these messages, defendant Felix edited selectively picked messages to create the appearance that Miss Blair made statements that she did not. There were two major issues with Blad's claims here, one, the conversation in question was from 2020, a year before Felix signed the

5:12supposed confidentiality agreement, and two, Felix only presented personal communication and not specific information. Blad's lawsuit was built on weak arguments and relied on vague language to support her claims. A good example of this was when Blad's lawyer referenced Wonderstruck's video on her, reading, Defendant Wonderstruck created a one hour and twenty minute video with defendant Oz, where both defendants make the following claims, that Miss Blair stole defendant Wonderstruck's car, that Miss Blair committed wage theft, when in reality Blad simply deducted taxes earnings and other claims. Throughout Wonderstruck's video, he never mentioned that Blad stole anything from him and only stated that she repossessed the car. To muddy the waters even further, Blad included words like quote and other claims, unquote, which pointed out nothing specific, leaving things open for interpretation, a shady tactic that would come back to bite her down the line. For now, Oz would file a motion to dismiss Blad's lawsuit, and as you'd expect, it was very compelling. Reading, plaintiffs complained fails to articulate the alleged defamatory statements

6:13made, including any finding that such statements are plausibly, proofably false or defamatory. The amended complaint further fails to identify any confidential or proprietary information that was misused by defendant Oz Media. Plaintiffs' entire amended complaint should be dismissed for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. The document further debunked Blad's complaint by highlighting obvious issues, such as the majority of the facts being irrelevant to her claims of defamation, and the ones that had any relevance lacked substantial evidence to support them. In addition, Oz's lawyer stressed that Blad shouldn't be often another chance to amend her complaints, since she already failed to do it before. What followed was a response from Blad's lawyer that basically reiterated irrelevant facts and further accused Oz of ruining her career. Reading, these false allegations have severely impacted plaintiffs' reputation in the YouTube community. Plaintiffs were well respected documentarians, a reputation which is waiting if not all destroyed due to defendant Oz's actions. Even now, Blad refuses to take accountability for destroying her career or provide reasonable evidence to prove her erroneous claims. All she was

7:17doing was pointing fingers at her former friends and hoping the court would rule in her favour. Unfortunately for Blad, things weren't going to be that easy, as Oz's lawyer pointed out an outdated case law that her argument was built on. While the judge didn't act on Oz's motion to dismiss yet, they would acknowledge that Blad had failed to prove reasonable evidence to support her claims of defamation, and demanded that she would file a second amended complaint with sufficient evidence within 14 days. Reading, it is ordered, within 14 days, plaintiff may file a second amended complaint. All defamatory statements by all defendants shall be set out for beta. You'd think with such leniency and clear instructions, Blad would get her act together and present a reasonable argument. But you'd be wrong. Not only did she fail to submit the amended complaint within the allotted 14 days, but she added even more unrelated facts along with more vague allegations. In Blaz amended complaint, she added extra details about her time with the three defendants and re-enforced how their respective posts had damaged her online reputation. Regarding Oz, Blad claims that during her recovery from surgery, he convinced her to give him

8:21six months of mortgage payments upfront because the bank was going to foreclose on the house they were living in. But what makes things even stranger, Blad claims she didn't remember any of this due to the painkiller she took post surgery. But stated that her sister and her friend did remember, so she went along with it. Blad later confronted Oz about the mortgage payments, claiming that Oz agreed to repay the money that was quote wrongfully coerced from her over two years. This was around the time that Oz found out she had moved on to someone else, and Blad resumed that it motivated him to start a plot with Wunderstruck to ruin her career. Reading, Ms Blad is under the information and belief that it was around the time that all defendants began plodding to effectively ruin Ms Blad's business reputation and life. When referencing Oz's recent video on her, Blad resorts he made defamatory statements when he stated, I even offered to work in a crypto fund for free to pay back the date, to which Blad and her lawyer stated quote, The statement would have been a family because there were misrepresentations of the facts, which caused Ms Blad and Pyramid to be hated, ridiculed, shamed, and harmed plaintiffs' business. The

9:23statements had the tendency to imply that Ms Blad engaged in financial coercion, causing some form of indentured servitude. All Blad was doing was recounting unrelated events and drawing correlation to the demise of her career without any solid proof. Sadly, this patent would bleed into a statement about Wunderstruck and Felix. With Wunderstruck, Blad rehashed the issues they had over the car she leased to him and stated that after she took her back, he posted information and sparked outrage against her. As for Felix, Blad repainted the claims that Sharon Discord's green shots was a breach of contract and part of their campaign to damage her image. Blad also accused Felix of making defamatory tweets when he said she uses the word retard in private, reading, Defendant Felix asserts that Ms Blad, though she publicly disapproves of the aslo, uses it in private. This statement carries a defamatory meaning, because it implies that Ms is both a hypocrite and a bigot. What followed were new motions to dismiss from both Oz and Felix, which progged even more holes in Blad's lawsuit. Starting with Felix's motion to dismiss,

10:23he indicated that throughout her lawsuit, Blad failed to indicate any instance where he breached the company's NDA. Reading, The second amended complaint alleges one instance to support plaintiffs breach of contract against Mr. Felix, which relates to turning over private messages between himself and Ms. Blad that have nothing to do with proprietary information. The original complaint, the first amended complaint and the second amended complaint, will fail to identify any confidential or proprietary information that was misused by Defendant Felix. Oz's motion would go more in depth on how Blad blatantly ignored the court's order to state the exact defamatory statements he made. It was obvious to everyone that Blad didn't have a case against any of the defendants, but she still pushed to make another response. In the response to Felix's motion to dismiss, Blad tries to pass off her messages to him as propriety instructions from her company. Reading, It's worth noting the conversation was private. That means the information and data were not generally known outside the company. The disclosed conversation revealed instruction from the owner of Pyramid to a pyramid employee regarding the use of Pyramid's data. Remember, the raw footage Blad asked

11:27Felix to go through wasn't specific to her company, but was shared by all members of sad milk, not to mention that the conversation in question was long before he started working for Blad. In essence, Blad was trying to present a simple order as top secret company information to give her case some likes to stand on. Blad's arguments would only get more unreasonable when she addressed Oz's motion to dismiss. All we have to do is look at the first few paragraphs. This case exists because plaintive Blair began dating someone you and her ex-boyfriend, Defendant Oz did not like it. Rather than respect her choices, Defendants began a social media revenge campaign against her by publishing false and harmful statements about her and her once lucrative business. The only thing her lawyers got right was that her business was once lucrative. The current state of Blad's business is not because Oz or Wonderstruck wanted revenge, but instead due to her unthurst for vengeance. Even now, the entire case was nothing more than a petty ploy to shift the blame and grasp the straws of her dying YouTube channel. Blad was so dedicated to a path for revenge that should go as far as

12:28filing a restraining order against them. Back in March 2024, an anonymous Reddit user posted three leaked documents regarding Blair's lawsuit to Arslaz Illuminati. The documents included Oz's motion to dismiss along with two civil protection orders from Blair, one against Oz and one against Wonderstruck. The civil protection order stated back to 2023, and alleged Blair had suffered quote, stalking domestic abuse and physical assault. In one of the documents, Blair had accused Oz of weaponizing his audience against her, making defamatory statements against her and worst of all, claiming that he would physically assault their dog, Caspar. While Oz could put up with all the other accusations, this was crossing the line. In a failed attempt at a restraining order back in June of last year, Blair is flat out lying and claiming I used to hit Jasper. Just food for thought, if I, God forbid, hurt Jasper, why would Blair be in tears at the end of her original video, stating that she would miss our friendship, and specifically, how much of a best friend I was to Caspar. I've had to publicly bite my tongue on so many of the claims she's made in a legal system,

13:30but I can only take so much. Twisting facts, documents and even her own words weren't out of the question, if it meant Blair could get some sense of revenge. Blair had previously used Oz and Caspar's relationship to talk on viewer's heartstrings in her apology video. But now, she was using it to frame him as an abusive pet owner, only time will tell what fact she'll be overt next in a bid for revenge. Blair's YouTube career is dead, and she killed it. However, that hasn't stopped her from trying to bend the legal system to put the blame on someone else. Filing one base as claim after the other, in an attempt to recuperate some of the revenue she rightfully lost. Unfortunately, for her, the courts don't seem to be ruling in her favour, but it should be noted, I'm not a lawyer and do not have much knowledge in the America's legal system. I am simply a smooth-brained YouTuber so take everything I say with a grain of salt. Penguin Zero's theory on her running another YouTube channel with an AI voice is highly likely, as Blair clearly knows how to get popular on YouTube, and if she kept her personality and drama starting away from the channel, she would likely still be successful and on her way to 2 million subscribers. Instead,

14:34she is wasting time and resources trying to sue and ruin the lives of her ex-employees. But sadly for her, the only life she's going to end up ruining is her own. And that's where I was expecting the video to end. However, on the 8th of June 2024, everything would change, as Blair would see a victory in court. As Shaden Madcaste's video titled Big Glossort Victory for Luminati, the judge would deny Oz's anti-slap defence as he did not feel the statements were in a public matter of interest, despite being made on YouTube. The judge's decision came as a surprise to many, considering the public nature of the dispute and the widespread attention had garnered online. By denying Oz's anti-slap motion, the judge effectively allowed Blair's defamation claim to proceed, giving her a small victory in the ongoing legal battle. Even more shockingly, the judge also allowed Blair to add a new claim for computer fraud in the second amended complaint, despite the fact that this was beyond the scope of what the court had authorised. It seems the judge has granted Blair an unusual level of leniency in amending her

15:34complaint. While Blair may have scored a winning court, it's important to remember that this is not necessarily mean that the judge believes her allegations are true. The case will still need to be determined at a trial, where both sides will have the opportunity to present evidence to support their claims. Regardless of the outcome, one thing remains certain. The full of a liminality will go down as one of the biggest downfalls in YouTube history, and I will continue covering the updates on the situation, so make sure you subscribe.