Skip to content
TrackPodcasts
societyJul 20, 202634:02pending

The Feb 26 Letter That Could Decide Jackie’s Case

About this episode

Everything now appears to come back to one document: Jackie Henderson's complaint letter to ARN on 26 February.

In this episode, workplace relations lawyer, Michael Byrnes, explains why ARN's amended defence has shifted the battleground away from the on-air argument and onto Jackie's motivation for writing that letter.

Did Jackie genuinely raise workplace concerns? Or had she already decided to leave breakfast before the complaint was made?

Michael breaks down "good faith" in plain English, explains why the timing matters so much, and takes us inside Jackie's court-ordered medical examination and how much weight the report could carry.


Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Get every episode summarized

Each time Game Changers Radio publishes, we email you a written briefing from the transcript — the topics, who appeared, and any specific claims, with the ad reads skipped.

Email me new episodes

Free for 3 shows. No card needed.

Hosts & guests

No transcript yet

This episode has not been transcribed. Request it and it moves to the front of the queue.

The Feb 26 Letter That Could Decide Jackie’s Case

Game Changers Radio

0:00
34:02

More episodes

More from Game Changers Radio

View all episodes →