The Best Of Mark Levin - 3/21/26

0:00Every day, excessive delays and denials from big insurers keep patients from accessing the care they need. And when care is urgent, these delays can be disastrous. These practices cost billions in wasteful spending, driving up costs for American families. But while big insurers put up barriers, America's hospitals and health systems are in your corner. Navigating endless reviews and appeals to get you the care you need when you need it most. It's time to curb these harmful practices and put the focus back on patients. Brought to you by the Coalition to Strength in America's Health Care. It's all quiet in the underground bunker. Doors closed. Locks bolted. But the great one isn't just resting on his laurels. He's making sure your weekend is even better by giving you his best. This is the best of Mark Lavin. There's an effort to hijack the conservative movement. There's an effort to hijack mega. And I've told you before, I think mega, much of it, is the old tea party.

1:02And of course, the conservative movement, constitutional conservatism, is the umbrella to tea party, mega, traditional conservatism, constitutionalism, and so forth. We have never stood for and never will stand for. A defense of the Third Reich. Attacks on Christians. Attacks on Jews. Attacks on our ally Israel. We can have differences of opinion, of course. But that's not what I'm talking about. I'm talking about the fundamentals. The fundamentals. We will never try to sabotage our movement from within. We are good people, patriotic people, we love our country. We know the real threats that face this country.

2:03Illegal immigration. Jehadi Islamism. Economic socialism. Ideological Marxism. We see the consequences all around us. From the George Soruses and the Mondamis. From the Bernie Sanders and the Talibs and Omar's. And yes, from the woke right neo-fascists. They say they want to talk and debate, but they don't want to talk and debate. They want to control and devour, just like the Marxists in the Islamists. There's nothing to debate if you believe that Hitler had a few good points. And that Churchill was the villain of World War II. There's nothing to debate. There's nothing to debate if you demand that Jews take DNA in order to determine if they're actually Jews.

3:05There's nothing to debate. There's nothing to debate if you sit on the sidelines or Erica Kirk is being brutalized by some of the most racist, anti-Semites. And you sit silently and say nothing to a widow whose husband was assassinated six, seven months ago. Nothing. And there's nothing to debate if your goal is actually to destroy MAGA. And destroy the Republican Party. And serve basically the interests, the interests of the Democrat Party. When you say MAGA is dead, the Republican Party should lose. You see ladies and gentlemen, since I was 13 years old, long time ago,

4:08I've been a conservative activist. And I've read and I've read and I've studied and I've studied and I've debated and I debated. Our movement, our liberty movement has never faced anything like this before. The left is more extreme, more violent than ever, ever. And then this neo-fascist right seeks to devour us from within and now they're undermining the president's staving them in the back and our military in the middle of a war. That's not who we are. That's never who we're going to be. There are some quizzlings in talk radio and elsewhere who throw up their hands and say, can't we just all get along? I would like us all to just get along. But if we just sit on the sidelines silently and throw our hands in the air and say, can't we just get all along, then we're going to lose. We're going to lose to the left and we're going to lose to this to this virus, to this poison, in our own midst.

5:12The Democrat Party should have stood up to the Marxists. The Democrat Party should have stood up to the Islamists. But it didn't and now that's who they are, that's what they represent. Those of us who are goldwaterites and Reaganites and Trumpites, those of us who are participants in the Tea Party movement, Convention of States, who pushed hard for the election of Donald Trump, those of us who backed the military and the police and loved this country and won our border secure, those of us who know what the Declaration and Constitution say and support them. We can't sit silently while this is taking place. But what we have found is that the Marxists in the Islamists, they really don't want to debate us. They want to control us. And what we have found with the neo-fascists is their idea to debate.

6:12It's like a debate within the clan or the neo-Nazis. That's not a debate either. We have nothing in common, zero, zero in common, zero. When you root against your own country against the Islamist Nazis in Tehran, whether you're a neo-fascist, whether you are a Marxist or an Islamist, whether you're a Democrat or a phony Republican, we patriotic Americans, we draw lines. That's unacceptable. There's nothing to debate. When you're a hater, a hater, when you're a saboteur, when you're a grifter, there's nothing to debate. But when we do debate, when we do debate, we want to debate with people who are intelligent. We want to debate with people who know something. We want to debate with people who've actually done something other than been in the media, other than become rich in the media.

7:25Self-serving, self-aggrandizing, narcissistic, what's the debate? When I was young, I would look at people in the media who were like William F. Buckley, who by the way ran from Mayor of New York in 1965, I think it was. Started Young Americans Foundation, really one of the great youth foundations that still in existence. Found a national review magazine. This guy was an entrepreneur. He was a leader. And great minds like Milton Friedman and Thomas Saul, who still with us, because they said things that were profound, that were important for humanity. And they loved the country and they wanted to protect this republic. That's what we, constitutional conservators, fundamentally, are all about. Protecting the founding, so we, and the next generation, can share in the fruits of such a fantastic society.

8:34And we're happy to debate. Debate with people who've done something, who know something. But we have found that the neo-fascists haven't done anything and don't know much. Sofa grandizing and narcissistic grifters. Now it's not the time for people to throw their hands in there. Can't we all get along? We need to win the day. Now if we want to get along, I have some basic requirements. And then we'll get along with the neo-fascists. And I find it interesting that people even say, I'm tired of these podcasters fighting, so am I. I just became one, a podcaster. But what's their resolution to allow these imposters to take over the conservative movement and destroy us? Is that what Bill Buckley did

9:38with the John Birch Society? No, I don't think so. Does that what Ronald Reagan did? No, I don't think so. Is that what Donald Trump has done? No, I don't think so. If talk show hosts, whether they're behind a radio microphone or a podcast camera, whatever they are, if they don't have the guts to defend this republic, then what good are they? What good are they? Now that's said, there are no serious people. None. In this neo-fascist cabal. None. No serious people. They don't have serious views. They lie. They're conspiratorial. They are foul as hell with their mouths. They say things that should humiliate them that they should apologize

10:39for, not to me, but their kids. Their kids hear what they say. They hear them drop the F bombs. They hear them talk about Genitalia. They hear all this stuff. Are they proud of their mom? Are they proud of their dad? Are they? We on conservative talk radio, we don't platform neo-Nazis. We don't drop the F bomb or not allowed to, but we don't, and we wouldn't. Every other sentence, like that's some kind of appeal to somebody. I think this generation, many of you have been fantastic in what you've done for this country, your family, but we have an element, an element that is utterly and completely defective. They are all about

11:46themselves, rather than use a platform, like a podcast or a video podcast, to pass wisdom, to past knowledge, to past substance. It could be entertaining, it could be funny, it could be a little bit outside the box, I got it, to pass it on to younger people. People in their teens, their upper teens, their low 20s, mid 20s, low 30s, to pass on information knowledge that could be useful in their lives. That's not what they're doing. They're propagandists for the darkest side of humanity. Jew hatred, Christian hatred. It has no place in the conservative movement, none. It is no place in MAGA, none. Mr. MAGA says so himself, that's the present, and I'll get to that next segment. None. That's not something

12:50to be debated, that's something to be denounced. There's so many cowards, you have no idea. So many cowards. I understand when you step into this, like I told my wife 10 or 11 months ago, I'm stepping into this toxic sewer, because these people are going to destroy the Trump presidency, they're stabbing them in the back, they're going to destroy the conservative movement, the constitutionalists, they're going to destroy any chance of the midterms, and they still have done grave damage to us, grave damage to the Republican Party, MAGA, and the conservative movement. But many of these people are psychotic. Many of these people, you're not their audience, Americans aren't their audience, people in Pakistan, people in the Middle East, people in Southeast Asia. That's their audience.

13:52Over 90% of you support the president and what he's doing with Iran. You understand the mission, you understand the enemy, you're smart. You want to protect your family, you want to protect future generations, you understand. A terrorist with a nuclear missile is death. Death. You got it, you know it. That's not a game. And then they tell us that's not what we, MAGA. That's not what we believed. That's not what we voted for. Are you kidding me? What did we vote for? Did we vote for terrorists that have nuclear weapons? I don't remember doing that. Did we vote for president to appease the enemy to the point where the lives of everybody in this country's at stake? Mark the wind. His operation epic fury intensive us. The world braces for what's to come next and people

14:55of faith pray for freedom and for God's people in the holy land to be protected. And in the holy land, red alert sirens fill the air sirens that give you only 15 seconds to reach the nearest bomb shelter. The situation is serious, the threat is real and at times like this, freedom and faith aren't just abstract ideas. They are what we depend upon. In the international fellowship of Christians and Jews is on the ground, preparing large-scale distributions of life-saving food, first aid emergency essentials for security personnel while helping ensure hospitals and emergency rooms and shelters are stocked with critical medical supplies. This aid is focused on Israel's most vulnerable, the sick, the elderly, children, families in great need. But the international fellowship of Christians and Jews needs your most generous gift today to make this work possible. So please rush your gift, which is tax deductible by calling right away 888-585-IFCJ. That's 888-585-IFCJ. Or online at Levin for the fellowship.org. That's L-E-V-I-N for the fellowship.org.

15:59Making your weekend even better, this is the best of Mark Levin. If there were an individual, the number two, the deputy at the Director of National Intelligence Office. In this office was created after 9-11 to gather all the intelligence from throughout the federal government, and to present that information to the Commander-in-Chief once or twice a day. To ensure that the Commander-in-Chief had the very best information from all the intelligence elements and assets we have, to make a decision on behalf of the United States of America, to protect us. And what if you find out that the number two person in that office,

16:59that the number two person in that office is hostile to the President's agenda? Who rejects the decisions of the Commander-in-Chief, the ultimate decision on when to undertake military operations war? And what if that individual, it turns out, is alleged to have been a leaker, and has been leaking information to friend and foe alike reportedly, including to woke right, R-E-I-C-H, neo-fascist, podcasters? What if this individual leaked the facts that meetings had occurred between the Commander-in-Chief and other individuals, where the Commander-in-Chief may not have wanted that information public?

18:02What would you call a person like that, America? Would you call them a patriot? Would you call them MAGA? What would you call a person like that, America? Wouldn't you need to determine what kind of information this person has in fact been leaking to determine if they violated the espionage act? Is that a form of espionage, whether it's officially criminal or not? Well, I'm basically describing a man by the name of Joe Kent. Joe Kent, who resigned today, because I suspect that he feared he was going to be fired, because he was a serial leaker as the reports go, in that all-important position where he reports to Tulsi Gabbart.

19:06An apparently Gabbart was informed that she needed to do something about it, according to reports, I wasn't there, and she did not. That is to remove him. They're literally individuals circling the wagons around this man, including the woke rike, neo-fascist podcasters, and de-influencers. And of course, the Marxist Islamists, who opposed his appointment in the first place, the Democrats in the Senate, who opposed his appointment in the first place, are now praising him. Praising him. Turning him into a martyr. Furthermore, according to reports and things that I've been reading, this is a man who dabbled in

20:11white supremacy, who dabbled in neo-nazism. I don't know that we can call him those things at this point, but there's no question. That he dabbled in it. And in his resignation letter, which was written for the press, written for the Democrats, not a private resignation letter to the president of the United States, but a letter written for all those who oppose our president and oppose this war effort and who are undermining our military. A letter that no doubt will be quoted by the enemy and give them aid in comfort without question. A letter intentionally, word by word, put together to create controversy and to make the job of our president much more difficult and the men and women in uniform

21:12were fighting these nazi terrorists more difficult while his defenders talk about his 11 deployments in the war and his great service as a military man. And it was, but the people fighting in this war today deserve the same amount of respect and support. And this man, the dishonor disappointment, dishonored himself, this man is effectively smearing, undermining the men and women in uniform today who are taking on this hard enemy. And he does a number of things in this letter. He decides that there was not an imminent threat. He, not the president, not the vice president, not the secretary of state, not the secretary what he decides. There's not

22:15an imminent threat. Thereby trying to use his former position and his resignation to destroy support for the president as commander in chief in this war effort. It is a disgusting disgrace. He is a disgusting disgrace. Nobody's questioning his military background and the things he did in support of his country. We weren't talking about what he's done now. What he's doing right this minute. He's immediately embraced, immediately, by Katarelsen, by Kelly, by Jones, by Owens, by Fuentes, immediately embraced by them and more. And how dare you question him, they say, unless you've served, I guess they're not familiar with American system of government. We're allowed to question anybody whether we've served or not.

23:20But even if we haven't served, we still have a responsibility to speak up for our country, our commander in chief and the men and women who are in the field fighting the enemy right now. Regardless of who's stabbing them in the back. Regardless of the background of the person stabbing them in the back. And that's exactly what this joke Ken is doing. Stabbing the president in the back, the secretary stayed in the back, the secretary defends the CIA director and our men and women in uniform. He is a conscientious objection, you see, to the war. But he doesn't have a right to leak if that's what he did. And if you leak classified information, we have a law called the espionage act that you're familiar with by now. I don't know what he leaked. Oh, I have one example of what he leaked and I'll get to that in a minute. This is no hero. He was a hero, he's no hero anymore. It's one thing to be a conscientious objector, you resign and you leave. Took him an awful long time,

24:23didn't it? Why now? Why not three weeks ago? Why not a year ago? What else does he do in this letter? He blames the Jews and Israel. You see Israel and its lobbyists and its advocates here in America, they pressured the president, pressured the president to go to war. I don't know. Is Marco Rubio Jewish? Is Pete Hague said Jewish? Is the head of the CIA Jewish? Which Jew did this exactly? Which is really official? Is so powerful, so influential, that he convinced the entire national security apparatus, the entire Pentagon, the president of the United States, the secretary of state, the secretary of defense, Radcliffe, the head of the CIA, which Jew is it?

25:28That has this kind of power. None, there are none. None. These loathsome can contemptible, disgusting, immoral, Jew haters. It always turns out that they hate our own country, doesn't it? Doesn't it? Whether they served or not, you can wrap yourself in patriotism. You can wrap yourself in your background. You can attack me all you want. You can try and intimidate me. It's not going to work. You can try and threaten me. It's not going to work. I always stand firm behind the United States military and this command or achieve, and I will always stand firm against an Islamist Nazi regime that wants to build nuclear weapons and wipe us off the face of the earth. I will always stand firm

26:32against a genocidal regime that kills 50,000 of its own people. I am perfectly comfortable in my own skin. I am perfectly comfortable with my own principles, my values, my beliefs, and yes, my faith, my faith that borne another faith. I make no apologies. I am proud. Weasels who secrete themselves in the high positions and leak to the media and leak to podcasters who look the president in the face every day, behind his back, they are undermining him. Anybody who defends that, anybody, anybody who participates in that, anybody

27:33is no patriot as far as I am concerned, quite the opposite. Our president is a great man. He is a great leader. He's made a very difficult decision. I mean, really, it's a simple decision but difficult because he has to put up with this, with this, with media individuals who have contributed nothing to the country, nothing, with the Democrat Party that is defunding our defenses at home and undermining our defense overseas. It's to put up with individuals and I'm sure it's not just this guy and others. Who don't have the guts, the guts to put their name to the leaks to the media?

28:33He's got more guts than you, Mark. He's served 11 times. I'm not talking about that. I am talking about. When you serve directly the president of the United States, you do not conduct yourself that way. If you did it in the military, there's not a commander in the United States military who would put up with somebody undermining the mission and leaking to the media and the media printing it and therefore giving information to the enemy. There is no commander. It would tolerate that for two seconds. The letter this man wrote, this Joe Kent, is a letter of contempt against the country and the president. If you want to resign because you disagree with the war, you're perfectly free to do so. If you want to write a letter, you're perfectly free to do so.

29:38But if that letter has its purpose to do damage and also to camouflage your past conduct as an individual to the president relied on for loyalty who gave his confidence to. Well, that is a disgusting disgrace. I say that as an American, a red blooded American whose family members have gone to war. When you really need care, you need 24-7 access to a care team, not a maze of paperwork from a third party. Every day, America's hospitals and health systems show up for you, navigating healthcare can feel overwhelming. But you can count on real doctors, real nurses, real people, providing quality around the clock care when you need it most. They're in your corner. In communities across America, your neighbors, your lifelines, right beside you holding your hand and helping find answers. That's what putting patients first to actually means. Learn more at strengthinhealthcare.org.

30:40Brought to you by the Coalition to Strength in America's Healthcare. You're listening to the best of Mark Leven. The meaty keeps saying that, MAGA, you make America great again. You, Mr. and Mrs. America, red blooded patriotic Americans, Levenites, that there's a big divide among us. There's no divide among us. Zero. We support the president. We support with the president's doing. There's a relative handful of malcontents and miscreants and representatives whose audience consists mostly of Pakistanis and others. Leftists and Democrats who love to hear them trash our country, love to hear them trash our president, love to hear them trash our military. And they have placed in strategic places in the administration some of their acolytes. And what are those acolytes doing? They're undermining the President of the United States and

31:40the United States military. By the way, I posted, I know these guys hang on the internet day in and day out. I posted a message inviting Mr. Kent, Joe Kent to come on the radio show for an hour. So I could interview him. I don't know how to reach him. He said, sure, let's go. Mr. producer, can you open the microphone? Have you reached out? Attempted to contact this, this, this, correct. The DM-demon X. So you DM-demon X and so forth. Have you got any response? Nothing yet. No response. Well, we will wait. But I'd love to interview him. I've got a lot of questions. About things he has said, things he has done, associations he has, about whether he's leaked, who he's leaked to. Is he leaked to Carlson? Is he leaked to others?

32:45It's what the White House is saying. He's a known leaker. All kinds of questions I have for the man. Many, many questions. This idea also that Israel dragged us into this war. Ladies and gentlemen, Israel is a nation of 9 million people. It's a country that size a new jersey. We are a massive superpower with resources, a military, hold on folks, with resources and a military, nobody else, nobody else can possibly have. Now they're going to be little breaks. I'm going to be taking a little early. I'd be a brother who's having a procedure and it's very serious one, and I'm quite serious about it. So that was one ring. So I'll take a little early break just not yet. But nonetheless, I will continue. Israel didn't drag us in any of the presidents, says it didn't. And 47 years. For 47 years,

33:46we came under attack. You know who said that? Joe Ken. 47 years. Finally, a president has done something. Dragging us into a war. They try to assassinate our president. And they're dragging us into a war. It's time. It's time to blow off these clansmen, these neo-Nazis, these neo-fascists who are slick. They want you to believe they camouflage these, these, these really poisonous statements in America first jargon and so it's ridiculous. It's preposterous. It's false. Now, here is John Racklip at a hearing today. And you specifically asked by Senator Kornin, what would have happened if we didn't take action

34:51imminently against Iran? This is the head of the CIA. Cut four ago. If left unimpeded, yes, Senator, they would have the ability to range missiles to the continental US. It's one of the reasons why degrading Iran's missile production capabilities that is taking place right now in the Operation Epic Fury is so important to our national security. Okay, so Ken is wrong and Ken was not in on the briefings for the last several months. Why is that? I want to ask him all about this. Why is it? How can you have a deputy director of national intelligence? Who the White House says is leaking incessantly and he can't be in certain briefings because they're afraid he's going to leak? I think those are fair questions. Don't you, Mr. Producer? How can you say one thing three months ago, one year ago, two years ago,

35:55and it completely opposite thing today? Well, conditions change. No, no, no, we're not talking about conditions changing. And I want to know, are you a leaker to whom have you leaked? What reporters? I want to confirm that he was the leaker in my case with the president of the United States. I've got a lot of questions. I went on the record. On the record. John Ratcliffe again with Senator John Corn and cut 12. Go. The head of the National Counterterrorism Center resigned saying that Iran did not represent an imminent threat to the United States. Is there anything to indicate that Iran had ceased in its nuclear ambitions or in its desire to continue to build ballistic missiles capable of threatening American troops and allies in the Middle East?

36:55Senator No, in fact the intelligence reflects the contrary. So you disagree with Mr. Kent? I do. I would think any fair-minded assessment of the situation, even based on open sources would reflect the danger Iran posed the regime poses to the United States. So Mr. Kent disagrees with the CIA director, the Secretary of Defense, Secretary of State, President of the United States. So what information does a guy who's cut out of intelligence briefings because it's accused of being a leaker? What information does he have that the commander-in-chief doesn't have? What did he base it on? That there's not an imminent threat. You just heard what Ratcliffe said. It's a very honorable man. I don't believe he ever leaks. So what information did he have? We want some facts. We want some evidence to back up what Joe Kent has said. President of the United States says, no, I wasn't dragged into the war. The United States wasn't dragged into the war. We set the timing. In fact, the opposite could be said

37:59that we dragged Israel into it. Whatever it is, does Mr. Kent have to disprove this? He's got none. But I want to give him an opportunity to present it. I want to go through his letter. I want to go through his contradictions. I want to go through whether he's a leaker. I want to know who he leaked to. I want to know if he leaked. Was it to Tucker Carlson? What about his association with Nick Fuentes? Is that okay? Is that normal? Is that Maga? Now Tucker Carlson knows about this because Tucker Carlson interviewed him and Fuentes made these comments in October when he interviewed him. Listen to this. Cut 15 go. Like, take Joe Kent, for instance. I supported Joe Kent and I talked to Joe Kent. I got introduced to him by Matt Brainerd. Matt Brainerd went to my conference in 2021. He bought a table. He was a campaign manager. He was. Or he was a consultant. But he writes new words on the campaign. Yeah. So he was on the Joe Kent campaign. Is that what I

39:01understand, Mr. Reducing? Go ahead. Lot. He loved my conference in February 21, which he bought a table at for his organization. Look at America. And in 2021, we and by we, I mean my nonprofit and myself and my team, we wanted to support America first candidates in the midterms. Like you said, authentic opponents of you. Yeah. That's how I found Joe Kent. Yes. And so I burned the feather. Oh, should I say anti semites of a feather? Go ahead. Bull in that sort of scene. Like Ryan Gerdeski, I know was very supportive of Joe Kent and other people that are more private. I don't want to name, but they put me on a name all the Nazis and all the Stalinists, you know, but they're all back in Joe Kent. You hear this folks? The question is how the hell do you get the job? That's the other. I got a lot of questions for Joe Kent. Who promoted him? Who was lobbying for him? Go ahead. In Georgia, Gibbs and Michigan, a lot of different people, and Joe Kent was

40:06one of them. And I had a phone call with Joe Kent. And I told him I had my assistant on the phone too, who's Jewish, by the way, just because I want you to know I want you to live. Go ahead. So I'm on the phone with Joe. And I said, look, we support you. And we want to do everything we can to help you. We want to have my followers knock on doors for you. We want to boost your social media. Anything that you need, we want to help you. I said, and we don't even want to be publicly associated. I said, because we know that that might hurt you. I said, the only thing that we ask in return is you can't disavow me if the media asks, and you can say whatever you need to say, but you can't disavow. Interesting background this guy has. He voted for Bernie Sanders. I think in 2000 or some point, was a libertarian, was a Democrat, then a Republican. He ran twice for the house in a Republican district and he lost. One of the Republicans around against him in

41:12the primary said, I warned you about this guy. There's a whole thing here that I think we need to learn about and know about. And it's not going to happen with a woke right neo-fascist podcasters. Because you know why, ladies and gentlemen, they're trying to destroy Donald Trump right now. They're trying to destroy MAGA. They're undermining our military. They want us to lose. They literally want us to lose. Just like the Democrats, just like the Marxists and the Islamists. Tucker Carlson, Megan Kelly, Steve Bannon, it's the rest of these whole names. I can't remember them all. They're rooting against us. And they weave and they bob. No, we're America first. No, we just don't think of these forever wars. They're rooting against us. The president knows it too. Mark Lovin. The great one. Make sure we can even better. This is the best of Mark Lovin.

42:16We're not done with Tulsi Gabbard. She looked very happy up there. Did she miss the release? I didn't think so. That's six. Go. Was it the assessment of the intelligence community that there was an imminent nuclear threat posed by the Iranian regime? The intelligence community assessed that Iran maintained the intention to rebuild and to continue to grow their nuclear enrichment. What was it? That's not a pair of seconds. Just say, you know, imminent threat is not a test that's necessary. It's when they're throwing around. They use it because they're thinking about the War Powers Act and so forth. That phrase means nothing. It doesn't even have a definition. That said clearly there was an imminent threat. And I noticed that not a single person asking that question ever defines what that means. Never. Ever. Now, let's use common sense, Mr. Mrs. America. If the enemy is building nuclear weapons and they say they're going to have

43:2010, excuse me, 11 in 10 days. It seems to me that's an imminent threat. Put it on a ballistic missile. Now they can't quite reach the United States, but they're almost there. So what do they do then? They give it to terrorists. You don't have to actually shoot a missile, you know. Maybe they'll put on a boat. That doesn't look like one of theirs. I mean, there's many ways for terrorists to be terrorists, you know. And then what happens is everybody, how the hell would this happen? Why didn't anybody know? Why weren't we in a lookout? Trump is told all about this. They knew about it. They didn't do a damn thing. They didn't do anything about it. That's what you get from the Democrats and the media and the isolationists. 2020 vision, one 30 million people are blown off the, you know, face the earth. President's not going to do that. We didn't elect him. That's not MAGA. Suicide's not MAGA. It's crazy. Go ahead.

44:24Community that that was a jackass asking questions is this punk from Georgia? Ossof, Senator Ossof, who grew up in a very wealthy family. He had to work very hard to go to the bank and take out his checks. And he's up for re-election in Georgia. It's a radical leftist. Go ahead. Minute nuclear threat posed by the Iranian regime. Yes or no? Senator, the only person who can determine in what is and is not an imminent threat is the president. What she means by that, because this guy is obviously illiterate when it comes to the matters of war and peace. The intelligence agencies present all the data that they have to the president. The envoy presented all the information he had or they had to the president. The president has to take into consideration more than raw intelligence is to take into

45:26consideration our military capacity. That is what we can do or can't do in the face of a potential danger or even an imminent danger. There's a lot of moving parts in this. And so if you're a punk Senator and you don't know your answer and you don't know what you're talking about, this is the kind of question you ask. Go ahead. This is the worldwide threats hearing where you present to Congress, national intelligence, timely objective and independent of political considerations. You've stated today that the intelligence community's assessment is that Iran's nuclear enrichment program was obliterated and that, quote, there had been no efforts since then to try to rebuild their enrichment capability. The problem is that it's subsequent to that and he knows this. Steve Whitkopf said on my show and then later on other shows, maybe I've said it on Sean's show before too. Exactly what the Iranians told him and revealed to him because they thought

46:31that would scare us off. I mean, honest to God, ladies and gentlemen, what would this guy do are these other people do? What we can't do? Well, we know what he would do, nothing. But what we did, you know, you get this information, you know, these maniacs, 47 years have been slaughtering Americans, directly and indirectly, they get a nuclear weapon, then what are we supposed to do? What do we do once they get a nuclear weapon? There's not a lot we can do. Let me tell you something, this piece mission I call it, this military campaign has gone on, it'll be 17 days I think tomorrow, less than three weeks. They've destroyed their capacity to make any more ballistic missiles. Now they're just trying to take out the launchers and what they have left. They've destroyed their capacity. We're trying to hunt down the locations for any of this nuclear material because they've built these, you know, the Islamists are terrorists are very, very good at tunnels and, you know, stuff like that. I mean, if these Islamists were only

47:36civilized, they'd be very good at, you know, building subway systems and, you know, things like that, basements from homes. Did you have any of these I'm talking about? But nonetheless, the Democrats have no plan and they would tell you you shouldn't do anything. Oh, I'm wrong about that. Give the enemy billions of dollars trying to buy them off and then they use that money to further proceed and to accelerate their terrorist activities. That's what the Democrats did. Worked out really well. Yes, what was there was obliterated and the problem is they went right back at it and they were able to hide 22,000 pounds of nuclear material elsewhere, elsewhere. The country's huge. It's as big as Alaska. And this jerk sitting in the Senate thinks he knows everything and he knows absolutely nothing. Go ahead.

48:36Was it the intelligence community's assessment that nevertheless, despite this obliteration, there was a quote, imminent nuclear threat posed by the Iranian regime. Yes or no? It is not the intelligence community's responsibility to determine what is and is not an imminent threat. That is up here. Here's the problem. Yes, doesn't want to hear it. He's got his result than he wants. It doesn't matter what she says. It's all about gotcha. That's all. Cut seven go. The ICSS is the regime in Iran appears to be intact but largely degraded due to attacks on its leadership and military capabilities. Its conventional military power projection capabilities have largely been destroyed, leaving limited options. So you just listening to that and she goes on, don't you feel a lot safer? I feel a lot safer. Don't you, Mr. producer? I mean, can we give a tip of the hat to the president, his team and the military? Can we even do it? No! War monger, Neil Khan? No! Come ahead.

49:42Jake position has been significantly degraded. The U.S.-led maximum pressure campaign and snapback of European sanctions. These are a lot of accomplishments, aren't they, Rich? All right, let me play the game so we can thank the Jews for this, right? Right? We can thank the Jews in the Israelis today and me. It's my war I was told. I did this. The Jews did it and the Israelis did it. Are blowing out because they dragged us into the war. Just listen to Kent. Not exactly Clark Kent, Joe Kent and Katarelsen and the rest of them. So if there's enormous success, I guess it's due to me and due to my faith and due to the little tiny country of Israel. You see how sick and stupid this is? We're making spectacular progress. We're doing a fantastic thing that needs to be done

50:46and the president is doing it. The United States military is doing it. In alliance with the Prime Minister of Israel, in the Israeli military, the president has said that Hague set this set. Everybody says that. It's not a little Israel dragging us into a war. It's a little Israel fighting side by side with us in a war or really it's a military operation or what I call a peace mission because that's the goal. That's the goal. You know, you got these malcontents riding in the street, burning buildings, attacking cops. It's a peace movement. Peace movement. And of course, it's not. What you see taking place now, that's a peace movement by the United States military and Israel. Mark the Vin.

51:46We're giving you nothing but the best, the best of Mark Leven. Something called notice.org and the Trump White House, Joe Kent and so forth and so on. Those had Piglieri in Jasmine Wright. It's a legitimate site, by the way. FBI Director Cash Patel has privately indicated a desire to make public as much information as possible about material allegedly leaked by Joe Kent. Resign this week as Director of the National Counterism Center. According to law enforcement, Mr. Produce, would you open your microphone, please? Have we heard back from Mr. Kent? I'm still waiting. I sent him a DM yesterday. Okay, we've tried. Tried. What am I deaf? He ducked. We tried twice. You have Mr. Kent on the program, including before he did his spectacular propaganda, Iranian event with America's anti-Semite, America's Christian Hader, America's America Hader, that would be

52:52Qatar. By the way, he charged for that interview if you wanted to watch it. He had a sign up for his monthly deal $9 a month. So I said, look, friend of mine watched. I can't watch this stuff. It's just too stupid. He watched and he said, guess what name was the most often mentioned? And a lot by Kent and Katarelsen. I said, let me guess. He said, yes, you, me. And the reason is, you see, Katarelsen is a real slime ball. So he says, I'm not attacking him. I'm not questioning him, but he wants to put a target on the back of my head. That's what he's doing. And I'm not the only one he's attacking others too, but apparently he's obsessed with me. He's obsessed with me. So his deep throat, Mr. producer. No, I won't get into that right now. I'll save that for another day. Did I just violate my own promise, Mr. producer?

53:52I didn't say who she was, right? Okay. So I never mentioned her. Did I? And I don't know what people are thinking, you know, during Watergate, the deputy FBI director was obviously leaking, not obviously he was how that after he died, to the Washington Post, Woodward and Bernstein. And they called him deep throat. And then they wrote a whole book called deep throat. They did a whole movie called deep throat. That's what I'm referring to, of course. Anyway, let's move on. Patel believes class declassifications could head off accusations that the timing of the investigation in Kent makes it appears if the administration is retaliating against him for quitting his post and publicly breaking with the White House over its war in Iran. The source said, look, I don't talk to cash Patel. Not because I don't like it. I do like it. But there's nothing to talk about. But I would advise him over the air publicly openly. Don't worry about these people, Cass. They have no clout. They call themselves influencers. They're de-influencers. Nothing they've tried to do to sabotage this country has worked.

54:57And a hundred percent a mega-support Trump and zero percent support them. So we've got another poll in the New York Post that I'll get to in a moment. The FBI is investigating alleged leaking of classified information by Kent. According to two government officials, it's actually according to four. Semaphore said four. Once the investigation is complete, the findings will be sent to the Justice Department, which would then decide whether to fire criminal charges. Now it's very interesting. This guy, General Mike Flynn, who's turned out to be a real whack job and he's not the only one. I know. All these people hurt who you thought were good, who I defended personally, day in and day out. Yes, very, very absurd, but I can't control it. It's them. It's not us. Now that's said. They're putting things out there. He better not be prosecuted. He did not

55:59be. They're not saying he didn't do it. They're not saying he shouldn't have done it. They're not saying, well, let's wait for the evidence. What they're saying is they better not prosecute Kent. So now he's immune. He's immune because he undermined the president and allegedly leaked. I'm not done with this article. It goes on. The defection of Kent, a former green beret commando, with strong maggot credentials. What are the strong maggot credentials? The guy voted for Bernie Sanders in 2020. He was a Democrat. He switches to Republican. Now in 2020, he votes for Sanders. Does that mean he voted for Biden in 2020? I don't have any idea. Well, he couldn't have. He voted for Sanders. You get my point in the general election. So it's a recent Republican. He wasn't always a Trump supporter, except when he decided to run for Congress twice and lost and all of a sudden he moved right. Now he's moved left. It's set off a firestorm in Washington,

57:04quote, I cannot in good conscious. Support the ongoing war in Iran. Iran pose no imminent threat to our nation. And it is clear that we started the war due to pressure from Israel and its powerful American lobby. So Bloomberg taking the bait and not just them. They contacted us, you know. There's a true Mark Levin lobbied for the war. I didn't lobby anybody for any of them. Everything I said was behind this microphone on television. Everything. Everything. Isn't that crazy? But Tucker said it. So you get this guy has leaked so much to the media. They work very closely together. You think these are now. These woke right types are very close to the media. Politico, Bloomberg, Washington Post, New York Times, because they trade on this stuff. They want to undermine you and me, Mr. Mrs. America, red-blooded Americans. So these are all grifters.

58:10And they trade on this stuff and they trade on gossip. They always say, you know, the establishment. They are the establishment. Look, look at the woke right podcasters. They're the establishment. They've been in the media. And by that pretend journalist. Oh, I'm a journalist. You're a journalist. He used to support taking out the ballistic missiles. He used to support. I wanted a question. I've got everything right here, like a good prosecutor. I've got it right here. I've got my questions. I've got the documents. I'm ready to roll. And Joe Kent won't show up. Now, either his lawyer told him, don't do it. Or Katarelsen told him, don't do it because I obviously, I would ask him about all his communications with Katarelsen. Why not? Are Megan Kelly? Are Candace Owens or anybody else? I want to know who he's communicated with. If he hasn't leaked, he has no problem. He can say, look, I'd talk to these people all the time, but I never gave them

59:14confidence or classified information. That's a perfectly legitimate answer. Maybe they're all friends, but that's not really what I'm talking about. Is it? But I'm a journalist. I can talk to what? Shut up, you idiot. A law enforcement source at FBI agents had determined Kent shared secret government information with disaffected MAGA media figures like Tucker Carlson. This is what they wrote. I don't know if this is true. I want to know. I put a post out on social media all over the internet. And I said to Tucker Katarelsen, hey, look, but just tell us. Just tell us. Did Joe Kent provide you with any government information? Did he provide you with any confidential classified information? If not, just say no. Nobody gave me any classified or confidential information. I can say no. Now, what about him? Inquiring minds want to know. Tucker,

1:00:22a second administration official said that Kent leaked classified information from a server to a member of the media. Now, this is why the media is circling the wagons around Kent. And around the woke right neo-fascists because they all work together. That's the dirty little secret. I don't work with these media types. They do. And they're doing it to trash Trump. They're interesting to media. It could be Bloomberg. It could be the New York Times whatever. They know. They know that Tucker Carlson is an anti-Semite. They know. That is adduating scum. They know. That he's a Christian hating scum. They know. That he's the front for Katar and Iran and all the rest of it. I believe he is anyway. Certainly a mouthpiece. And yet they still work

1:01:22with them. They don't work with them. Do you think they would have worked with gobbles during World War II, Mr. Producing? Probably right. Yeah, why am I even asking that? Now that the FBI nor Carlson immediately responded to requests on Thursday, why Tucker? What is wrong with this request? Did you receive any confidential or classified information from Kent? Simple question. You talked about these texts. Now clearly you had text. I talked about this last night. You had text with foreign governments. Did you? That's okay. Did you? For me, my question is focus in like a lawyer, like a prosecutor. Will you texting the regime in Iran in the lead up to the war? Don't the war? Were you? They're an enemy. We've declared that they're the enemy. Were you or were you not texting with the enemies? It's that simple. Was he? He clearly was. I mean, I had to assume he was. I was trying to get out

1:02:32and look at my texts. They're now at Sifara. They're going to investigate. When you read this article, and look, I'm only basing it on public information. I don't have any insight information. I don't even want it. I draw my own conclusions and use my own rationality and experience. The guy comes out last week with a weird video. Looks like he's, you know, it looks like a kid in that video out of Sweden or something. Anyway, you can see he's wetting himself. He's saying, hey, hey, hey, you know what? What? Where it is that I've been to investigation? Where it is that the excuse me. I can't do that pre-bubescent stuff. Where it is that they've been looking at my texts. Where it is that the CIA released them? Where it is that I'm being investigated for a far investigation? Where it is? Really? Why are you being investigated for a far investigation?

1:03:38And why would the CIA have your texts? And I told you this at the time. The only way the CIA would have took a guitar since text isn't because he was on their list to monitor. It's because as they are monitoring the Iranians in every way possible because it's a lead up to a war and it's a war, and we need that intelligence information. I'm not violating any state secrets. I didn't say how it's done or where it's done because I don't know what they're doing, but I do know generally that's what they're doing. Why wouldn't they? Obviously some texts came to go, look at this. What? Tucker? No, there's not many talkers out there. Tucker, what can I name as Tucker? Aren't many talkers out there? Look at this. Look what's in this text and this one and this. Here's the point. Tucker knows if he texted them and what he texted them. If he texted them and said the weather's beautiful out there, okay, that's fine. Nobody cares, but if he's texting them something else, that's different. That's different. See, this is why they hate my guts.

1:04:44Because I figured this stuff out. Explain it to you. I explained it to you last week. I've explained it to you earlier this week. I explained it yesterday. I'm explaining it again. I mean, the press said to me when I said, no, talking about. So Kent went on. They write Carlson's popular online show Wednesday's first public appearance since his departure on the show. Carlson highlighted Kent's longstanding view that a U.S. war with Iran would be disastrous. That's not Kent's longstanding view. Would strengthen China and the rest. Carlson framed the situation one in which powerful government figures are caught in a line trying to silence. So Bloomberg wants to know if I lobbied the president. Now this happens because this is a attempt to change the narrative. Look at this. Mark Levin lobbied the president on behalf of Israel, but I didn't. Everything I've said is public. Public. Public.

1:05:49I certainly wouldn't have pecs with the enemy. That's a fact. Some curious to know. Tucker can come clean. He already put out that video. That raises a lot of questions, does it not? Every day, excessive delays and denials from big insurers keep patients from accessing the care they need. And when care is urgent, these delays can be disastrous. These practices cost billions in wasteful spending, driving up costs for American families. But while big insurers put up barriers, America's hospitals and health systems are in your corner. Navigating endless reviews and appeals to get you the care you need when you need it most. It's time to curb these harmful practices and put the focus back on patients. Brought to you by the Coalition to Strength in America's health care.