
newsJul 8, 202629:54pending
Supreme Court Narrowly Passes Reading Comprehension Section
About this episode
But Sam Alito still has a job.
-----
The Fourteenth Amendment lays out birthright citizenship in clear terms. Every subsequent legal challenge and all the scholarly work on the subject -- until about a year ago -- agreed on how to read it. Yet, the Supreme Court still managed to split on the question, with a 6-3 decision knocking down Donald Trump's executive order purporting to overturn the key constitutional provision -- that was more accurately 5-4, with Kavanaugh agreeing with the result on other grounds, but joining the dissent in erasing the Fourteenth Amendment. Or maybe it was 6-3 with an asterisk, because Neil Gorsuch went rogue, mostly agreeing with birthright citizenship in the only scenario the Trump administration really wanted to snuff out. Chief Justice Roberts also took his burning desire to be seen as the middle of the Court comically too far, authoring contradictory opinions back-to-back. And Sam Alito did not retire, despite reports. And in Biglaw, we continue to wonder where all the raises are.
Get every episode summarized
Each time Above the Law - Thinking Like a Lawyer publishes, we email you a written briefing from the transcript — the topics, who appeared, and any specific claims, with the ad reads skipped.
Email me new episodesFree for 3 shows. No card needed.
No transcript yet
This episode has not been transcribed. Request it and it moves to the front of the queue.
More episodes
More from Above the Law - Thinking Like a Lawyer

The ILTACON Wrap-Up
Above the Law - Thinking Like a Lawyer
Sep 3, 202638:32completed

A Tribute, A Tactic, Or An Appellate Issue?
Above the Law - Thinking Like a Lawyer
Aug 26, 202626:35pending

Luigi's Double Jeopardy Gamble And The DOJ's Complicity
Above the Law - Thinking Like a Lawyer
Aug 19, 202632:25pending

Biglaw Surrenders Were Worse Than We Thought
Above the Law - Thinking Like a Lawyer
Aug 12, 202631:25pending