Supreme Court Denies AI Art Copyright Case
About this episode
Supreme Court Denies AI Art Copyright Case; Human Authorship Rule Upholds
The Supreme Court recently declined to hear a case regarding AI-generated art and its eligibility for copyright protection in the US. The case involved Stephen Thaler, a Missouri-based computer scientist, whose AI system created an artwork titled A Recent Entrance to Paradise. The Copyright Office denied Thalers application in 2022, stating that only works with human creators qualify for copyright protection. Lower courts and the Trump administration supported this decision, maintaining the long-standing rule that copyrights require human authorship. The Copyright Office has also rejected requests from artists using AI tools like Midjourney, further solidifying the uncopyrightable status of AI-only creations. This leaves creators and tech firms in a state of uncertainty as AI tools continue to evolve.
Support the show
Get a discount at https://solipillow.com/discount/dnn.
Advertise on DNN
[email protected]
This is an automated, high-level news summary based on public reporting.
Report issues to [email protected]
View sources & latest updates
https://sources.thednn.ai/813df73f61f22c91
Get every episode summarized
Each time US News Today | 2 Min News | The Daily News Now! publishes, we email you a written briefing from the transcript — the topics, who appeared, and any specific claims, with the ad reads skipped.
Email me new episodesFree for 3 shows. No card needed.
Transcript ready
16 searchable segments. Every word is indexed and playable.
Full transcript
US News Today | 2 Min News | The Daily News Now! — Supreme Court Denies AI Art Copyright Case. Machine-transcribed; use the interactive transcript above to jump the player to any line.
On March 2nd, the Supreme Court turned down a case on Monday about whether AI-generated art can get a copyright in the United States. It centered on Stephen Thaler, a computer scientist from Missouri, whose AI system created a visual piece but was denied protection by the copyright. Office. Thaler applied for the copyright back in 2018 for an image called a recent entrance to paradise, showing train tracks leading into a, glowing portal amid green and purple plants. Officials rejected it in 2022, ruling that only works with a human creator qualify. Lower courts backed that decision, and even the Trump administration advised the justices to skip the appeal. This keeps the long-standing rule that copyrights need human authorship firmly in place. The copyright office has also shot down requests from artists using AI tools like mid-journey, even when people guided the process, unlike Thaler's, fully autonomous claim. The House Supreme Court input, AI-only creations remain uncopyrightable for now, leaving
creators and tech firms to navigate unclear waters as these, tools evolve.
More episodes
More from US News Today | 2 Min News | The Daily News Now!
LIV Golf Files for Bankruptcy | US News
US News Today | 2 Min News | The Daily News Now!
DOJ Monitors New Hampshire Primary | US News
US News Today | 2 Min News | The Daily News Now!
Menendez Brothers Face Early Parole Hearing | US News
US News Today | 2 Min News | The Daily News Now!
Lithuania Prepares Citizens for War | US News
US News Today | 2 Min News | The Daily News Now!