
About this episode
Three big things you need to know: First, our survey results, which are bottom-up in nature and driven by domestic policy views, imply that the event is relevant to US equity markets, but perhaps less so than some market participants may believe. For our US analysts, a Republican sweep was seen as the most bullish outcome, while a Democratic sweep was seen as the most bearish outcome, but the key thing to note is that the tilts were extremely mild. Second, some of the traditional Trump trades continue to emerge in policy assessments and sector views. Among our US analysts, Energy and Financials had some of the most bullish tilts in a Republican sweep scenario, and some of the most bearish tilts in a Democratic sweep scenario. Third, in terms of our own broader market call, we’ve viewed the elections as creating near-term uncertainty in the US equity market and the potential for some short-term choppiness, but the survey results add to our growing belief that the thing that may matter most for US equities (for 2024) is getting past the event so companies and investors know what they are dealing with.
Get every episode summarized
Each time RBC's Markets in Motion publishes, we email you a written briefing from the transcript — the topics, who appeared, and any specific claims, with the ad reads skipped.
Email me new episodesFree for 3 shows. No card needed.
Hosts & guests
No transcript yet
This episode has not been transcribed. Request it and it moves to the front of the queue.
More episodes
More from RBC's Markets in Motion

Baking in a Two-Speed Economy & EPS Backdrop into Our S&P 500 Forecast
RBC's Markets in Motion

Taking The Stock Market’s Temperature, Takeaways from an Avalanche of Earnings
RBC's Markets in Motion

Resilience With a Dose of Caution
RBC's Markets in Motion

April 2026 Global Analyst Survey Results - Constructive, Aside From The War
RBC's Markets in Motion