About this episode
In this episode of The Backstory on the Shroud of Turin, Guy R. Powell interviews lawyer and Shroud researcher William Red, who applies legal reasoning to the centuries-old mystery of the Shroud.
William explains how courtroom standards reasonable suspicion, balance of probabilities, and beyond reasonable doubt can be applied to Shroud evidence. He demonstrates why the 1988 Carbon 14 dating, flawed by breaches in protocol and limited sampling, would be inadmissible in court. Instead, he highlights stronger evidence:
- Pollen unique to Jerusalem
- Dust samples from crucifixion-related areas
- Blood serum halos around wounds
- Forensic details confirming crucifixion practices
He contrasts absurd theories, like a Da Vinci forgery, against overwhelming corroborative science. Through a legal lens, the evidence tips the scales toward authenticity, pointing to a first-century origin.
This discussion bridges law, science, and faith, asking: what verdict would you render if you were the juror?
Whether you’re a believer, skeptic, or curious investigator, William’s perspective reframes the Shroud as more than an artifact—it becomes a witness to the Resurrection.
Click here to view the video: https://youtu.be/t-YWL2ZmWl0
Get every episode summarized
Each time Backstory on the Shroud of Turin publishes, we email you a written briefing from the transcript — the topics, who appeared, and any specific claims, with the ad reads skipped.
Email me new episodesFree for 3 shows. No card needed.
Hosts & guests
No transcript yet
This episode has not been transcribed. Request it and it moves to the front of the queue.
More episodes
More from Backstory on the Shroud of Turin
Gospel on Linen?
Backstory on the Shroud of Turin
Shroud Truth Revealed
Backstory on the Shroud of Turin
Shroud Mystery Examined
Backstory on the Shroud of Turin
Proof of Resurrection?
Backstory on the Shroud of Turin